Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/03/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
This was JUST deleted. Fry1989 eh? 00:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: recreation of deleted file —Mono 01:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
to be changed Sonel.SA (talk) 07:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC) {{speedy|reason}}
Deleted: Speedied as requested by uploader on day of upload. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see http://www.russianhelicopters.aero/ru/helicopters/civil/ka-62/photo.html ze-dan (talk) 07:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 09:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
even per PD-Finland50 this shot can't be free, as it is said to be from 1966 and 1966 +50 = 2016. But we still have 2013. Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, an error occurred. can be removed. Ville Siliämaa (talk) 09:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied and file listed in [Undelete in 2017]. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
I put the wrong name on the photo. Should be Gorgeted Woodstar. Joseph C Boone (talk) 00:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Wrong name is not a valid reason for deletion, please use {{rename}} instead Morning ☼ (talk) 12:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hurricanefan24 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Partial duplicate of File:Matthew 2004 rainfall.gif. Note to deleting admin: please redirect file to aforementioned one after deletion to fix any interwiki problems and prevent problems encountered by CommonsDelinker. HF (talk) 01:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Explanation: Huntster removed the above speedy deletion tag, saying that "the two files are very different from one another, so speedy deletion does not apply." I've responded on their talk page here with a response. HF (talk) 01:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- And I've replied here, asking that he remove all the speedy templates he's applied to the various rain maps, which are not duplicates and may be of value to other uses (both internal and external) who prefer the contour format to the shaded format. Speedy deletion for any of these files is inappropriate, and as they have educational value and potential for reuse. Obviously, my opinion is to keep all tagged images. `— Huntster (t @ c) 02:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn. HF (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept, HF (talk) 11:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio-Non-free album cover-- tntchn Comment · Contribs 09:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Fix use of wrong template--KTo288 (talk) 14:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted-non free album cover--KTo288 (talk) 14:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Commercial promo shot; out of [COM:SCOPE]] and somewhat unlikely "own work" of uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio from http://www.underbracks.com/. INeverCry 18:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Verlinkter Artikel wurde durch Schnelllöschung entfernt. Verein nicht relevant. Ansonsten keine Verlinking Timozipp (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope JuTa 21:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a crop from a yearbook (the low quality, blue border, and the text), making the claim of "own work" not credible GrapedApe (talk) 00:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Confirmed copyvio: http://web.archive.org/web/20090417012454/http://www.yale.edu/newblue/history.html --GrapedApe (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Deletecopyvio|1=Falsified, distorted version of http://www.grida.no/graphicslib/thumbs/1805c933-493c-4b85-be16-ad06eb342332/large/skin-colour-map-indigenous-people_8b88.jpg File:Globalindigenousskincolormap.png / as well as another copyvio file File:WorldSkinColorMap1.JPG|source=http://www.grida.no/graphicslib/detail/skin-colour-map-indigenous-people_8b88}} Che829 (talk) 07:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
((VD}}This file is a copyvio|1=Falsified, distorted version of http://www.grida.no/graphicslib/thumbs/1805c933-493c-4b85-be16-ad06eb342332/large/skin-colour-map-indigenous-people_8b88.jpg File:Globalindigenousskincolormap.png / as well as another copyvio file File:WorldSkinColourMap.jpg|source=http://www.grida.no/graphicslib/detail/skin-colour-map-indigenous-people_8b88-- Che829 (talk) 07:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed use of wrong template by nominator for DR--KTo288 (talk) 14:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
no longer exists. Tamoshaa2012 (talk) 14:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
no longer exists. Tamoshaa2012 (talk) 14:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
no longer exists. Tamoshaa2012 (talk) 14:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
no longer exists. Tamoshaa2012 (talk) 14:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
no longer exists. Tamoshaa2012 (talk) 14:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
no longer exists. Tamoshaa2012 (talk) 14:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
no longer exists. Tamoshaa2012 (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but this painting/drawing doesn't look that old. As there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright in Greece, this image violates the copyright of the artist. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Grece. Yarl ✉ 16:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but these sculptures don't look that old. As there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright in Greece, this image violates the copyright of the artist. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Grece Yarl ✉ 16:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but this sculpture doesn't look that old. As there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright in Greece, this image violates the copyright of the artist. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Grece. Yarl ✉ 16:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but this sculpture does have originality (thereby copyrightable) and doesn't look that old. As there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright in Greece, this image violates the copyright of the artist. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Grece. Yarl ✉ 16:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but this sculpture does have originality (thereby copyrightable) and doesn't look that old. As there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright in Greece, this image violates the copyright of the artist. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Grece. Yarl ✉ 16:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but this sculpture does have originality (thereby copyrightable) and doesn't look that old. As there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright in Greece, this image violates the copyright of the artist. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Grece. Yarl ✉ 16:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but this sculpture does have originality (thereby copyrightable) and doesn't look that old. As there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright in Greece, this image violates the copyright of the artist. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Grece. Yarl ✉ 16:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
mispelling — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmhermen (talk • contribs) 2013-02-25T21:26:02 (UTC)
- Hi! What page do you wish to have deleted? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Wissensmanufaktur.jpg. Froztbyte (talk) 23:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected JuTa 03:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- child 11 years - Macassar (talk) 10:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Enfant mineur - --Lomita (talk) 13:21, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Dans le doute, pour les mêmes raisons. NemesisIII (talk) 19:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Je voudrais enlever cette image, mais je ne sais pas comment faire est-ce que quelqu'un pourrais le faire ? --Saint-Zach (talk) 10:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Cordialement.
Neutral It's an unused personal image, but I don't wish to jump to the delete position because it is an interesting one. And of course "child 11 years" is no reason for deletion. Sinnamon (talk) 05:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Saint-Zach est sur la photo, c'est lui qui a importé l'image et il demande la suppression. Il est mineur (comme indiqué sur sa page de WP).Macassar (talk) 13:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Living architect. No FOP in France JuTa 01:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting as part of image upload cleanup russavia (talk) 10:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Contemporary art work by living sculptor Vincent Mauger (* 1976). No FOP in France JuTa 02:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as per nom and as part of image upload cleanup russavia (talk) 10:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Contemporary art work by living sculptor Vincent Mauger (* 1976). No FOP in France JuTa 02:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as per nom and as part of image upload cleanup russavia (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Uploader requested* Exact duplicate of File:N11199 (7640912528).jpg ALH (talk) 23:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: exact duplicate. moogsi (blah) 02:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Image of porn star claimed as "own work". Isn't, but I can't find this one with Google Images, unlike the other two copyvios the user uploaded. Rrburke (talk) 00:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:01, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 00:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:01, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
unused image, article creation denied (twice), no educational value Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:01, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:DW of painting. Location is unspecified, so it's not clear if it's covered by FOP, but most FOPs don't work on 2d paintings anyway. 99of9 (talk) 00:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per precautionary principle. Commons:FOP#Indonesia applies, so there is no FOP rationale, plus this does not appear to be illegal graffiti (I'm not sure, for all I know SAEF might be the local football team and the paintwork is amateurish). Location is actually given by the tags ("Port Vila" being in Indonesia). Thanks for highlighting this one, an oversight on my part. --Fæ (talk) 00:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:01, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:DW No suggestion at the source that the photographer also painted the painting. 99of9 (talk) 01:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I think the related blog post indicates that the photographer is not the painter. Though sponsored by the East Timor Development Agency, it is unclear if the artwork was released by the artist, so this should go per the precautionary principle. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 01:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:01, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:DW 99of9 (talk) 01:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not illegal graffiti, so should go per precautionary principle. I raised another shot, apparently from the same garden, for speedy deletion on the same rationale. --Fæ (talk) 01:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Reading the website links given on the page, the caption for the image is "Detail from a mural painted on a power substation by Erromango artist Andrew Tovovur." Which would make this image copyright to the artist, not to the photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Any creative elements in generating the book cover design from the original photo are not the work of the photographer. There has been some recropping, recolouring, design layout, so I think it's best to ditch this per COM:PRP. We already have the original photo anyway. 99of9 (talk) 01:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, happy for this to go via speedy. --Fæ (talk) 01:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Better version of same file at File:Havøysund 02.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue Elf (talk • contribs) 2013-02-24T13:37:29 (UTC)
- Delete As User:Blue Elf says, this is merely a darker version of File:Havøysund 02.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:48, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Unklarheiten ob Angaben zu Urheberrecht korrekt sind. SarahLena (Diskussion) 17:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC) JuTa 01:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As User:JuTa said, it is not clear if the copyright information provided is correct. There is no EXIF data. This user's last picture was also deleted for no copyright information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't .said that. I just completed User:SarahLena's incomplete DR. --JuTa 23:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
cpvio and/or out of COM:SCOPE. JuTa 02:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 03:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 03:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 03:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
It's very unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder. Eeekster (talk) 06:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry, but artist Raoul Ubac died only in 1985; thereby his works are copyrighted til end of 2055. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot Tuankiet65 (talk) 08:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan. --Yerevanci (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Norway. 84.61.169.81 10:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Hi, I am little bit confused by this request because the main topic of this image is the cliff with rock layering. The resolution of "the statue" is so low and unusable that it seems nonsense to delete this image. However, if the conclusion will be delete, the statue can be easily "remove by post-processing of the image" because it is no real the main task of this image. Therefore, I am against deleting. --Chmee2 (talk) 10:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep De minimis in my opinion. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 17:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysterious/unnatural sky formation. Gunnex (talk) 10:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, section 2 of the SPL terms is incompatible with Commons license requirements. I can see no mention on the source page of any creative commons license that might be specific to this image. Storkk (talk) 11:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Image seems to be taken from here - or is missing permission. Besides of that: the image is not in PD in the USA. Lymantria (talk) 11:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, only upload of Flickr account, likely Flickr washing Morning ☼ (talk) 12:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
This file uploaded by me. I got the file from author, Pavel Kashin. Author permits common use for low-resolution image only. I'm newbe in wikimedia. Please advise me what can I do? Андрей Ильин (talk) 13:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- You need to ask author to send permission (example: Commons:Email templates) to Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
per COM:DW Morning ☼ (talk) 12:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Speedy delete this. It was an accidental upload that escaped my pre-upload screening. Tm (talk) 12:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Unretouched version of this image in the same resolution was posted already in 2011 to http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=74819399&postcount=1 and said to date from 1981. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, the others photos from user Jorgelas were copyvios. Elisardojm (talk) 13:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of the Estrella Galicia logo and Deportivo da Coruña logo. Elisardojm (talk) 13:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Improbable claim of "own work". Widely available online with identical green frame, no EXIF: [1] Rrburke (talk) 13:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
A portrait of a no-name person that's taken in such a way that it's useless except as a portrait, and his no-name status (exemplified by his deletion log at en:wp) means that nobody's going to use this image; it's out of scope. Nyttend (talk) 13:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- On top of that, see File:Josh costell1.JPG, which isn't the same person. If you want to use an image of Josh Costell, how are you going to know which one is him? Even more out of scope because we can't be sure which person goes with this name. Nyttend (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Ditto the reasons given at the other nomination for a portrait of this guy. On top of what I said there, this person looks completely different from the one in that image, and I find it hard to believe that the uploader would know two different actors from the same city, born in the same year, with the same name, and photograph them on the same day. Since we can't tell which one the real guy is, how would a potential reuser know? This is even more out of scope because we can't certainly identify him. Nyttend (talk) 14:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Upload seems to be of promotional intent. Extremely prominent watermark can hardly be removed. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Upload seems to be of promotional intent. Extremely prominent watermark can hardly be removed. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Canada doesn't cover text. Stefan4 (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, lack of metadata and the uploader's history (all their other uploads were confirmed copyright violations). —LX (talk, contribs) 16:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
"FlickreviewR robot confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the by-nc-sa-2.0". Unfortunately we do not take that license. Jarekt (talk) 16:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, only text contribution. Jespinos (talk) 16:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, text contribution. Jespinos (talk) 16:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF and watermarked. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 16:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Photo of a copyrighted book MPF (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
"FlickreviewR robot confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0.", but we do not take CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0. Jarekt (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Sea otters holding hands.jpg --Jarekt (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- True, we don't take "NC" images - I'm not sure why I didn't notice this before! I will try to contact the photographer on Flickr today and ask for a commercial-friendly licence. Please allow some time for the photographer to respond. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk) 17:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- That would be great, if you could check with the author. You should check if he can either change flickr license or send OTRS email. Two or three weeks should be enough to hear back? --Jarekt (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Photo of house design plans, likely copyrighted MPF (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jespinos! I'm not sure I understand this nomination for deletion. Could you elaborate further?
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Casualty Logo.svg - all current usages replaced. Eladkse (talk) 17:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Feel free to delete it -- deerstop. 22:57, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 17:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Sono storta , sfocata, squadrata e tutto quello che volete, se non vi piaccio non commentatemi!Dedicata ai maestrini del photoshop! Io sono naturale!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (S.) (7551336872).jpg
[edit]Out of scope. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 18:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- The child can be identified, His face will be blurred and the picture changed. Child protection image, no discussion needed : Uploader request Daniel Villafruela (talk) 06:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC).
--JuTa 19:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- The child can be identified, His face will be blurred and the picture changed. Child protection image, no discussion needed : Uploader request Daniel Villafruela (talk) 06:55, 17 March 2013 (UTC).
--JuTa 19:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 20:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution and no valid EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 20:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 20:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution and PNG format. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 20:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
tomfoolery 89.66.66.43 19:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, only text contribution. Jespinos (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 21:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, drive-by uploader, no metadata. I smell copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
The file Anis Hamadeh 32.jpg depicts a person, article about whom is deleted. Probably he was too unimportant for wikipedia. But this picture was not deleted. The picture is not used anywhere. Taivo (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of permission from the photographer. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Uploader Sms263 (talk · contribs) has extensive history of uploading confirmed copyvios relating to The New Blue of Yale: File:BLOILOGO.jpg, File:BLOILOGO plain.jpg, File:BloiCantstop.jpg, File:Zoom Out WT.jpg, File:BloiParthenongroup.jpg, File:BloiHistorypicture.jpg. I can't find this specific image to confirm the copvio, but, based on the uploader's history, this should be deleted under the Precautionary principle.--GrapedApe (talk) 22:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Current license is clearly wrong; this is not a PD file. The link to the license we have unfortunately doesn't give the right to make derivatives. Prosfilaes (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Drawing likely not own work of uploader, as other images of the drawing were posted earlier, http://www.fotolog.com/victoor_lhp/19843269/#profile_start. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
The photograph is a derivative work, incorporating medals of unknown copyright status. Diannaa (talk) 22:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Presumably standard Canadian crown copyright. Non-free, so unacceptable on Commons. Maybe the deleting administrator could be so kind to tag this with {{Fair use delete}}? The image definitely meets English Wikipedia's non-free content criteria in the article w:125th Anniversary of the Confederation of Canada Medal. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- I am uploading a copy of the image for fair use in one article on en.wiki. -- Diannaa (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ahem... This photo is a scan of MY medal that I was awarded by the Lt Gov of the province of Québec in 1992. PLEASE do explain how you came to your conclusions... Fdutil (talk) 00:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- You didn't make the medal. The Canadian Government did that. See COM:DW. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
personal artwork, no educational value Avron (talk) 23:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Logo with copyright made with paint. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techarrow (talk • contribs) 2013-03-11T16:16:55 (UTC)
--JuTa 08:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Logo with copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techarrow (talk • contribs) 2013-03-11T16:14:57 (UTC)
--JuTa 08:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
--JuTa 08:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Completing an incomplete DR:
--JuTa 08:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 21:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 21:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 21:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo INeverCry 21:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 21:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Comment Also single upload of user. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
unused duplicate of File:Логотип КВТ.png INeverCry 21:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - image of non-notable person - no wiki articles - unused INeverCry 21:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable, no wiki article, & no EXIF data. It would appear from his user discussion page that this same image was deleted previously on 26 January 2013. That image (deleted) and this one are the only 2 images he has uploaded. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 21:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I found that same image here #1 here #2, and here #3 before I gave up looking. While it's a widely distributed image, I don't think there's proof that the uploader owns the copyright. This is the user's only upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - scanned image - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 21:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This image identified as "Alfredenzt von Strodelsotzer" is found here #1, here #2, and several other places. The curious thing is, that this gent pictured actually seems to be Tom Nissalke who has a wikipedia entry. Thus I find the "own work" claim unlikely. This is unlinked to the wiki article, misidentified, scanned image found in many places across the web, and the only upload of this user. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 21:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused logo - single upload of user INeverCry 22:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused logo - single upload of user INeverCry 22:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 22:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 22:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 22:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused text logo of non-notable website INeverCry 22:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I searched Los Golpes and found only a musical band. I don't really see why the project needs this logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 22:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Does this violate COM:ADVERT? The equipment is all from one company, SCH Technologies and the uploader of the files and the creator of this gallery is an employee there. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
I was uploading images to allow them to be put into Wikipedia. The page at wikipedia requests images. I was requested to do it this way by wikipedia. It appears that I am going around in circles here trying to get images published. Also, there aren't many non commercial images of equipment so what am I supposed to do? Its hard enough getting my own images accepted let alone someone else's
Conformal coating is a small world and its not exactly a hobby topic. I am a leading expert and I am trying to provide informative images and editorial as they feel fit. Surely, others are free to also publish their own images. I have never deleted or even modified someone elses input so what is the issue? The images are also non commercial and not even labelled.
I should also point out this was only done today so no one has had a chance to add to this yet.
Please help me get this right and work the issues out with wiki.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Leehitchens (talk • contribs) 18:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- The only issue I have raised is whether this gallery is in scope for Commons. I'm uncomfortable with a gallery that is essentially an advertising piece for your company, particularly since Commons does not have a well developed system of policing galleries. I have no problem with the images themselves. As you say, they may well be useful in an article in WP or outside of the WMF projects. I encourage you to use the images in an appropriate article on WP:EN or any of the other WPs.
- It's entirely possible that over the week that this will be open for discussion that the community will decide that the gallery is OK. The boundary here is not well defined, which is why I began the DR with asking if there was a problem rather than asserting that there was one. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jim
I can take them out of the gallery. Its no big deal. Wikimedia prompted me to put them into the gallery so I did. the real reason i am putting them in commons is to get the images into wikipedia. Again, this is a nightmare with copyright and I have just spent two days going through that. Finally, got it working and then this happens.
I was expanding the gallery next to add in defect photos of coating processes etc. But, if this is a problem then I wont bother. As I say this is a narrow field of people who will participate in entering information.
So, please just dont delete the images themselves or I will give up on wikipedia.
The irony is I put changes in wikipedia 5 days ago that was ranked by google instantly and found straight away. But because it was ripped down by others when you go the link the info is not there. This makes wiki look bad as hell and useless.
- #REDICRECT the gallery to Category:Conformal coating, move all the images to that category, place that category inside Category:Coating technology. Sinnamon (talk) 05:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
This redirect sounds fine. How do I do it? Sorry, still learning and as you can see I am trying to put this right.
- I was bold and I did a redirect for you. Hopefully everything is ok. Sinnamon (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:32, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
This isn't educational, this is pornography Manuelt15 (talk) 20:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep In use on many projects. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep obviously as the fact that it is used on so many projects clearly dispels the assertion that it doesn't have any educational value. Adambro (talk) 16:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is of public use. Many children look up information in the Wikipedia. I think it's pretty obvious that unnecessary, vulgar or way too explicit content must be deleted without arguing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thekangaroorat (talk • contribs) 06:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_rain_contour_map.gif){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![21 File:"The Observers" (2003) (1315080932).jpg](#File:"The_Observers"_(2003)_(1315080932).jpg){kind=link}
![22 File:"The Observers" (2003) (1315095678).jpg](#File:"The_Observers"_(2003)_(1315095678).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2684932696).jpg){kind=link}
_(6385610589).jpg){kind=link}
_(6385778765).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(7551336872).jpg){kind=link}
_(2684932396).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(Imagicity_1096).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_rain_contour_map.gif){kind=link}
_rain_contour_map.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_rain_contour_map.gif){kind=link}
_rain_contour_map.gif){kind=link}
_rain_contour_map.gif){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(1315080932).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1315080932).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![16:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/03/27#c-Túrelio-2013-03-27T16:15:00.000Z-File:"The_Observers"_(2003)_(1315080932).jpg){kind=link}
![16:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/03/27#c-Yarl-2013-03-27T16:23:00.000Z-File:"The_Observers"_(2003)_(1315080932).jpg){kind=link}
_(1315095678).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1315095678).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![16:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/03/27#c-Túrelio-2013-03-27T16:15:00.000Z-File:"The_Observers"_(2003)_(1315095678).jpg){kind=link}
![16:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/03/27#c-Yarl-2013-03-27T16:24:00.000Z-File:"The_Observers"_(2003)_(1315095678).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2684932696).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2684932696).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(6385610589).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6385610589).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(6385610589).jpg){kind=link}
_(6385610589).jpg){kind=link}
_(6385778765).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6385778765).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(6385778765).jpg){kind=link}
_(6385778765).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(7551336872).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7551336872).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Kept. In use, thus in scope. –Tryphon☂ 08:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
This video has no educational value. It dosn't give any information upon the theme: Ejaculatio praecox. It simply shows any ejaculation and can easily considered as pornography. Why do we have to accept someones exhibitionary habits disguised as educational? Lektordoc (talk) 10:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy kept - it's in use, so it has educational value. That it might be considered pornography is irrelevant. Oh and it's not a video. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
This is sexually explicit material. 197.76.131.76 00:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Per previous DRs, and Commons is not censored. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
nicht geeignet unter 14 jahren 2003:EB:473B:1100:EC35:7C04:87CD:3346 09:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Wikipedia and WMF do not seek to obey European laws. The same reason applies to
it's illegal in China, Iran and Saudi Arabia
: they do not care about Chinese, Iranian and Saudi Arabian laws. Not our problem to fix. German laws are not applicable to a court from San Francisco County, State of California. Nor to a federal US court. Tgeorgescu (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC) - Keep Explanation given ("not suitable under 14 years") is not a valid deletion argument. See Commons:Deletion policy. - SummerPhDv2.0 (talk) 20:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
_(2684932396).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Completing an incomplete DR:
- Living architect. No FOP in France — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bohème (talk • contribs) 2013-02-27T21:14:52 (UTC)
--JuTa 01:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
_(2684932396).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleting as part of image upload cleanup russavia (talk) 10:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
_(2684932396).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Copyrighted building, made by famous architect Jean Nouvel. No freedom of panorama in France Manahene (talk) 14:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Agueroluissss (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, text contributions.
Jespinos (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, only text contribution.
Jespinos (talk) 18:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Doubtful claim of own work. Cf. http://www.ritzsite.nl/RAI99CON/RAI_concept7.htm
- File:Seat toledo Cupra concept.jpg
- File:SEAT Proto T.jpg
- File:SEAT Proto TL.jpg
- File:Seat-bolero-trasera.jpg
- File:SEAT Bolero. lado.jpg
- File:SEAT Bolero puerta.jpg
- File:SEAT Bolero frontal..jpg
Brakehorsepower (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Mal reclamo fíjate si están todas las fotos en esa pagina yo diría que no así que no se para que pones que todas las fotos son de esas pagina se las abran cedido. No borrar --82.158.43.109 10:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- ¿Las 7 fotos son trabajo propio ("own work") de Alfredo17? -- Brakehorsepower (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deniix Soto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 16:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Djimmy Becker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused self-promotional images.
- File:Logo - MPR HD - 2012.png
- File:Logo - MPR - 2012.png
- File:Logo - MPR Média News - 2012.png
- File:Logo - MPR Média News - 2013.png
- File:Logo - MPR Music Prod - 2013.png
- File:Logo - MPR Radio - 2013.png
- File:Logo - Mimi Production - 2010.png
- File:Djimmy Becker.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 16:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 16:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Frances Roca (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
- File:Carlo Yair Costly Molina.jpg
- File:Amado Guevara y Jocimar UNCAF 2007.jpg
- File:Jocimar Motagua.jpg
- File:Jocimar Nascimento.jpg
- File:Santiago minella.jpg
- File:Juan pablo montes montes.JPG
- File:DIEGO maradona motagua.jpg
- File:Amado lobo Guevara.jpg
- File:Amado Guevara.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grzesiek88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, different cameras.
- File:Rajd w Góry Lubowelskie (maj 2012).JPG
- File:Sylwester na Pogórzu Ciężkowickim (grudzień 2011 - styczeń 2012 ).JPG
- File:Rajd Wielkanocny w Bieszczadach (Połonina Caryńska marzec 2013).JPG
- File:Rajd Wiosenny w Gorcach (kwiecień 2011).JPG
- File:Rajd Jesienny w Pieninach (październik 2012).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Going22.JPG
- File:Going3.JPG
- File:BaloonBaby3.jpg
- File:BaloonBaby2.jpg
- File:KidsBaloons.jpg
- File:BigLaugh.jpg
- File:BaloonBaby.JPG
- File:CuteLaugh.jpg
- File:SmileMustard.JPG
- File:ThumbSucking.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Please go ahead and delete.The error noted down and would be acting as per the rules. Thanks.--Gutam2000 (talk) 08:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images/logos
INeverCry 21:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
User talk:INeverCry please delete the Images/Logos. --112.133.202.166 06:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
spam, no educational value
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Question Aren't company logos copyright to the company that designed them? Apologies if this is a dumb question, but I see so many logos on Wikicommons, I've always wondered if it was o.k. or not? Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- It depends on whether or not the logo is complex enough to meet COM:TOO in whatever country the company or entity is based. If a logo is simple enough it can be hosted here under {{PD-Textlogo}}. If not, permission is needed or an explicit free license at the source. INeverCry 00:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jill Pmosely (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Lead Photo For List of awards and nominations received by Elizabeth Taylor0-697912554256618.jpg
- File:Lead Photo For Elizabeth Taylor filmography0-5508017216343433.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Avenue Elhadj Fadil.jpg (uploaded 20.03.2011) = http://www.leseptentrion.net/2011/03/douala-une-avenue-au-nom-des-fadil/ (18.03.2011, © 2013 Le Septentrion Infos) = http://www.leseptentrion.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/avenue-fadil.jpg (identical exif, but last modified: 21.03.2011)
- File:Bayero Fadil.jpg (cropped version, uploaded 14.02.2011) = http://www.camnews24.net/fr/interne.php?page=article.php&idmenu=35&idsmenu=64&idarticle=2119 (2009, © 2009 CAMNEWS24.) = http://www.camnews24.net/gestion/images/articles/mbfadil.jpg (lower res, but seems to be the original frame, last modified: 2009)
- File:Avenue Elhadj Fadil.jpg
- File:Bayero Fadil.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kelly Denis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Kelly K Denis.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis.jpg
- File:Kellis Doing It live In Church.jpg
- File:Kelly With Holy Keane Amooti.JPG
- File:MY FB COVER.jpg
- File:Wasted Talent Cover.jpg
- File:Kellis.jpg
- File:Destiny-1.jpg
- File:Up Line.jpg
- File:Studio Mic.jpg
- File:System Room.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis Playing a Jitar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely out of scope, and COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 09:36, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kelly Denis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional images, out of scope
- File:Kelly Denis.jpg
- File:Destiny-1.png
- File:Destiny-1 (PatricknKelly).jpg
- File:White T-Shirt.png
- File:Oh Lord Single Cover.png
- File:Blue T-Shirt.png
- File:Kelly Denis Logo Black & White.png
- File:Kelly Denis Logo Red & Black.png
- File:Twitter Banner.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis Logo Icon.png
- File:Kelly Denis.png
- File:Tumblr Header.png
- File:Destiny-1-BORN NOW.ogg
- File:Destiny-1-Oh Lord - Destiny-1.ogg
- File:Kelly wikip.png
- File:Kelly Denis 2013.png
- File:Sseku Martin Live In Concert..jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Morning ☼ (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Herby talk thyme 11:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Out of scope, editor on a self promotional rampage. That editor has been indeffed on en WP. Timtrent (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kelly Denis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Solely self promotional
- File:Kelly Denis-23.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-22.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-24.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-21.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-20.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-19.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-18.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-16.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-17.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-15.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-14.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-13.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-12.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-11.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-10.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-9.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-7.jpg
- File:Destiny-1 (PatricknKelly)-4.JPG
- File:Kelly Denis-6.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-5.jpg
- File:Kelly Denis-3.png
- File:Kelly Denis-2.png
- File:Kelly Denis -1.png
-4.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Timtrent (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:32, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahesh9097 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Mahesh Nanumasa2.jpg
- File:Mahesh Nanumasa3.jpg
- File:Mahesh Nanumasa4.jpg
- File:Mahesh Nanumasa.JPG
Jespinos (talk) 20:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 18:47, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Migue Sanchez Terrazas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nirvanablood (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 21:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nykvarnskommun1999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused logos
INeverCry 21:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Regine Rüeck (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused text logos - only uploads of user
INeverCry 22:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 22:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sachinpagire (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images, out of scope
Morning ☼ (talk) 09:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]After today identifying +40 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio-/Flickr-accounts, photo-hoster, blogs, official sites etc.) it´s difficult to believe that the remaining files are really - as declared - own work: Impressive talk page (now 57 problem tags, mostly regarding copyvios) and inconsistent upload behaviour (res changing from low to high to low to thumb, mostly without exif). Without counting the identified copyvios still an arsenal of different digicams in use: Motorola Xoom, SAMSUNG SL620, Sony DSC-W215, M1 V1702 and Fujifilm FinePix Z3. File:Douala Airport Fence.jpg + File:Douala Airport Fence 2.jpg with mysterious watermarks. File:Mbankomo7.jpg (uploaded in 03.2013) already circulating as thumbnail since 02.2013 via http://camfoot.com/actualites/e1-deux-equipes-du-tkc-contre-coton-sport-a-garoua,16221.html (Copyright ©2010 Camfoot. Tous Droits Reservés) = http://img2.camfoot.com/local/cache-vignettes/L150xH113/arton16221-392ab.jpg. Summarizing: Unlikely to be own work, IMHO untrusted user uploading a row of copyrighted material so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.
- File:Douala Airport Fence.jpg
Info watermark "CCAA" = http://www.ccaa.aero/ (Cameroon Civil Aviation Authority), added by Gunnex - File:Douala Airport Fence 2.jpg Info watermark "CCAA" = http://www.ccaa.aero/ (Cameroon Civil Aviation Authority), added by Gunnex
- File:Ferme Poulailler.jpg
- File:Douala Airport 3.jpg
- File:Douala Airport Tarmac.jpg
- File:ChèvreBamena.jpg
- File:Mbankomo31.jpg
- File:Mbankomo33.jpg
- File:Mbankomo32.jpg
- File:Mbankomo28.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg (identical exif), added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo26.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg (identical exif), added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo27.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg (identical exif), added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo23.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo25.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo24.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo21.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo22.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo20.jpg Delete copyvio/permission needed via http://mboafootball.com/international/coeur-de-lion/cyrille-djina-assantelock-on-attend-sereinement-les-lions-indomptables/ (18.03.2013, Copyright Mboafootball © 2012) = .jpg (identical exif), added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo8.jpg
- File:Mbankomo11.jpg Info previously circulating as thumb via http://www.camnews24.com/fr/sports/10-sports/21059-ils-preparent-leur-can-au-cameroun- (2012) = .jpg, added by Gunnex
- File:Mbankomo9.jpg
- File:Mbankomo7.jpg
- File:Mbankomo10.jpg
- File:Mbankomo6.jpg
- File:Scène de marché.jpg
- File:Le Chef inaugure le Rond point de la chèvre.jpg
- File:Paysage Bamena 2.jpg
- File:Paysage Bamena 3.jpg
- File:Paysage Bamena 4.jpg
- File:Bamena 34.jpg
- File:Bamena 33.jpg
- File:Bamena 32.jpg
- File:Bamena 31.jpg
- File:Bamena 27.jpg
- File:Bamena 28.jpg
- File:Bamena 29.jpg
- File:Paysage Bamena.jpg
- File:Bamena 16.jpg
- File:Bamena 09.jpg
- File:Bamena 07.jpg
- File:Bamena 08.jpg
- File:Bamena 06.jpg
- File:Bamena 05.jpg
- File:Bamena 04.jpg
- File:Bamena 01.jpg
- File:Bamena 02.jpg
- File:Bamena 03.jpg
- File:KeulongMbapNzweuh.jpg
- File:Enseignant à Bamena.jpg
- File:Lycée Technique de Louh 1.jpg
- File:Construction3.jpg
- File:Construction 2.jpg
- File:Habitation 2.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang8.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang7.jpg
- File:Scène du marché.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang6.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang4.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang5.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang3.jpg
- File:Parade NKouk Ngang2.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 7.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 6.jpg
- File:Koung Ngang.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 5.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 4.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 3.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 1.jpg
- File:Défilé du 11 Février 2.jpg
- File:Situation de Bamena.jpg
- File:Villa Tchaya.jpg
- File:Tribune du défilé de Bamena.jpg
- File:Place des Cérémonies.jpg
- File:Majestés.jpg
- File:Maison moderne de Bamena.jpg
- File:Paysage de Bamena.jpg
- File:Paroisse.jpg
- File:Lycée Technique de Louh.jpg
- File:Lycée.jpg
- File:Keulong Mbâp Zweuh.jpg
- File:Case.jpg
- File:Chèvre de Bamena.jpg
- File:Rond point Tchaya.jpg
- File:Atelier lycée technique de Louh.jpg
- File:Paysage vu de la route.jpg
- File:Lyvivmvy.jpg
- File:Lycée de Louh.jpg
- File:Mont Batcha vu de Touh lah.jpg
- File:Défilé 11 février.jpg
- File:Kouh Ngang.jpg
- File:Groupement Bamena.jpg
- File:Sa Majesté Njoukwe Nietcho Alexandre.jpg
- File:Case de réunion de Toubiéh.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 11:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Info Instead of eventually contesting all or some files of this DR, the envolved user preferred to upload 3 more copyvios... Gunnex (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I won't say I looked at all of them, but File:Groupement Bamena.jpg says to me that he's not trying to hide anything, he simply doesn't care. "Own work" isn't meaningfully a lie in this case; that would imply that he intended it to mean something.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]The license of these files do not seem compatible with that of Wikimedia Commons. See http://www.ird.fr/infos-pratiques/mentions-legales
Takeaway (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Score Beethoven (serial copyright violator: false licensing, file cropper, watermark remover, Panoramio etc. grabber etc. etc. etc.). Video screenshots, unsourced Flickr files, maps, songs (example: File:Sound Mangambeu.ogg --> grabbed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TnwUQgyipk, 2011, © by "Patrick Marsepoil"), website screenshots, etc. See also previous mass DRs.
- File:NanaArdo1.jpg
- File:NanaArdo3.jpg
- File:Allée Palais de Bafoussam.jpg
- File:Palais de Bafoussam3.jpg
- File:Porche Palais Bafoussam.jpg
- File:Palais de Bafoussam.jpg
- File:Palais de Bafoussam2.jpg
- File:Célestin Monga.jpg
- File:ADC.png
- File:Aéroports du Cameroun.jpg
- File:Tiko Airport.jpg
- File:Daouala Airport.jpg
- File:Menchum.jpg
- File:Aeroport Bafoussam.jpg
- File:Port Kribi.png
- File:Port Kribi.jpg
- File:Cameroun - Cameroun 1960 - Assassinat Félix Moumié.ogg
- File:Map Douala2016 01.jpg
- File:Map Douala2016.jpg
- File:Ceremony Ndop.jpg
- File:Benskin Choutouale.ogg
- File:Un village Un defaut.ogg
- File:Pourquoi dit-on Bamena voleur de chèvres.ogg
- File:Bandjounparlermoderne.ogg
- File:Sound Mangambeu.ogg
- File:Pnina Tamano-Sata.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical maps and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Singap Martin.jpg
- File:Lettre libération de Fossi Jacob.pdf
- File:Ngaoundal.png
- File:Carte Ndé.jpg
- File:Village Bamiléké.jpg
- File:Reseau Hydrographique Bassin Versant Wouri.jpg
- File:Bassin Superieur Noun Reseau hydrographique.jpg
- File:Bassin Sanaga Mbam.jpg
- File:Bilan apports hydriques Estuaire Wouri.jpg
- File:Réseau hydrographique Wouri.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Score Beethoven (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Ets Mas Douala 1.jpg
- File:Ets Mas Douala.jpg
- File:Caoutchouc et Cacaos du Cameroun.jpg
- File:Bongola Lokundje N'yong.jpg
- File:Fossi Jacob.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyvios or out of scope.
- File:Sean360x Club Kid.jpg
- File:Yaya DaCosta & sean360x.jpg
- File:Sean360x in Adroit Enough.jpg
- File:Amanda Lepore & sean360x.jpg
- File:Sean360x BODEGA.jpg
- File:KRS-One & sean360x.jpg
- File:Sean360x & Sahara Davenport.jpg
- File:Ultra Nate & sean360x.jpg
- File:Sean360x & Ntozake Shange.jpg
- File:Ari Gold & sean360x.jpg
- File:Sean360x & Ralph Carter.jpg
- File:Sean360x & Yetta G. Kurland OutMusic Awards.jpg
- File:Sean360x & Patricia Fields (Sex & the City).jpg
- File:Sean360x.jpg
- File:Sean360x Roaring 20s.jpg
- File:Sean360x Make Music NY City Hall.jpg
- File:Sean360x & Deepa Deidra Meredith OUTMusic.jpg
- File:KRS-One (Temple of Hip Hop) & sean360x.jpg
- File:Lee Soulja Darryl DBonneau sean360x Talia Coles OutMusic Awards.jpg
- File:Sean36Ox LOGO.jpg
- File:Kevin Aviance & sean360x OutMusic Awards.jpg
- File:Sean360x NIGGER BITCH.jpg
- File:Sean360x Gavin DeGraw National Underground.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%26_sean360x.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jespinos (talk) 17:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Uploader doesn't seem to know what {{Own}} and {{Self}} mean. Lots of photos are tagged as own work although they are obviously copyright violations. Some look like a book, although I can't read the language. It seems likely to assume that all files are copyright violations.
- File:Sankardoss Swamigal Naadaga Sabha conferred Seva Ratna Award to Correspondent.jpg
- File:Sankardoss Swamigal Naadaga Sabha greets Headmistress for bringing the School in State First in the Tamil Subject.jpg
- File:Hon'ble Pondicherry Chief Minister greets the Convenor Mr. Radha alias Krishnan.jpg
- File:Remembering the then President of India Dr. Radhakrishnan on Teachers Day celebrations.JPG
- File:Golu in School for offering prayers to Goddesses Saraswati.JPG
- File:Correspondent of our School gave respects to Hon'ble Pondicherry Chief Minister.JPG
- File:Hon'ble Pondicherry Chief Minister presented Mementos and Certificates to SSLC pupils.JPG
- File:Hon'ble Pondicherry Chief Minister presented Mementos to Headmistress of our School.JPG
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 12-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 11-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 10-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 9-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 8-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 7-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 5-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 4-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 6-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 1-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 3-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:தேவாரம் பாடல் பெற்ற 274 சிவாலயங்களின் 2-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:National Green Corps serving devotees.JPG
- File:Correspondent and Headmistress.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
- I have deleted the obvious {{Out of scope}} ones. The rest are out of scope too, but keeping them here just in case they are not. --Sreejith K (talk) 23:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope and possibly copyvios PierreSelim (talk) 07:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Scanned images of a magazine. Although the uploader most probably will not hold copyrights, I think the text might qualify to be de-minimis since it contains a simple list of hindu gods in hindu temples. But this can easily be represented by text/wikitable and so the images are {{Out of scope}}
- File:சிவஸ்தலங்களின் இறைவன் – இறைவி பெயர்கள் 7-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:சிவஸ்தலங்களின் இறைவன் – இறைவி பெயர்கள் 8-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:சிவஸ்தலங்களின் இறைவன் – இறைவி பெயர்கள் 5-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:சிவஸ்தலங்களின் இறைவன் – இறைவி பெயர்கள் 6-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:சிவஸ்தலங்களின் இறைவன் – இறைவி பெயர்கள் 4-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:சிவஸ்தலங்களின் இறைவன் – இறைவி பெயர்கள் 2-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:சிவஸ்தலங்களின் இறைவன் – இறைவி பெயர்கள் 1-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
- File:சிவஸ்தலங்களின் இறைவன் – இறைவி பெயர்கள் 3-ம் பக்கம்.jpg
Sreejith K (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SnapBAKstudio (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused text logos
INeverCry 21:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Soni noverizon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Saat per perpisahan.jpg
- File:Gembel.jpg
- File:S2.jpg
- File:Penyerahan piagam dari gm hotel.jpg
- File:Acara terakhir.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 18:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stafilochk (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
Jespinos (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stafilochk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small sizes, low resolutions, no metadata, and all same subject (footballer Casarini), make these unlikely to be user's own work, and instead COM:COPYVIOs.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tirytirina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 16:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 21:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Some people's pictures from Burning Man, but not obviously of benefit to the project. No link to Wikipedia articles. Attempt to make categories including "Future shamans" (!). Looks like some kind of self-promotion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 04:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyvios or out of scope.
- File:Sean360x New Dawn Fades film.jpg
- File:Sean360x Daniel Freeman AD.jpg
- File:Sean360x ART.jpg
- File:Mr Murray Hill & sean360x.jpg
- File:Imani Coppola Little Jackie & sean360x.jpg
- File:Fatima Americas Next Top Model sean360x.jpg
- File:Design Mavens model sean360x.jpg
- File:The making of the Black Man.jpg
- File:Adrian Grenier Minute Men sean360x.jpg
- File:Fashion Night Out Maxwell & sean360x.jpg
- File:Cazwell & sean360x.jpg
- File:Sean360x & Amanda Lepore.jpg
- File:Sean360x PARIs France.jpg
- File:Sean360x Paris Life.jpg
- File:Sean360x Paris.jpg
- File:Sean360x Model Paris.jpg
- File:Sean360x Pants Paris.jpg
- File:Sean360x VAMP FACE.jpg
- File:Sean360x NINJA Model Paris.jpg
- File:Sean360x GLAM Diva MODEL.jpg
- File:Sean360x Ashford & Simpson's Sugar.jpg
- File:Sean360x Steampunk.jpg
- File:Sean360x Steampunk Model.jpg
- File:Sean360x New Dawn Fades FILM.jpg
- File:Sean360x SteamPunk Fashion Show.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 17:18, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete for most of them for obviously promotional intent. --Túrelio (talk) 17:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolutions and missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.
Jespinos (talk) 17:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vincent Sandoya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 18:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
uploaded in error. 192.234.2.90 20:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC) {{speedydelete|copyrighted material}}
- Delete Log in with the account you used to upload the file, then you can request deletion using soemthing like {{speedy|uploader requested deletion}} on the file page, which is much easier. As it is, the file can be deleted as it's not in scope. --moogsi (blah) 00:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
One of the conditions of FoP China is that the author and the name of the original work must be attributed. This is not despite some research (see User_talk:Fæ#FoP-China). 99of9 (talk) 09:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- I remain unconvinced that there is any time limit on placing the attribution. FoP has a definition in China, and these example photos are of objects that eventually will be identified. Deleting the image virtually guarantees this will never happen. Perhaps a better answer is to have a clearer disclaimer on the licence so that any re-user understands their obligation to make effort to credit the artist?
- I'm not desperate to keep these photos, so will not be devastated if they go, I would just like to see a pragmatic approach to interpreting the more unusual FoP requirement for China. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- There's no "allowable time" to host a copyvio - it's like all other copyright, if you aren't compliant, you're violating the copyright laws. There is already a digitally photographed copy of the statue, and now copies of that on two media hosts. We are already reusing the statue! Commons tends to give some (usually 7 days) grace to fix up errors, but that has been well exceeded for these images. The Chinese law doesn't say "you should ask around and hope that eventually one of your friends comes up with the correct attribution". --99of9 (talk) 11:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- We should also recognize that copyright law is subject to interpretation and pragmatism in implementation. Nobody has yet to point to any real-life legal cases based on a failure of attribution under the FoP act for China. FoP does apply to this photograph, so it is only this detail that remains. Should the creator ever come forward then the remedy would be to add the attribution, as the photograph itself is correctly covered by FoP, there can be no particular damage from it being public so long as this is not denied. It would be great if someone interested in this part of IP law in China could provide some relevant case law to illuminate the Commons guidelines. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Let me slightly remix the bolded words on the FoP-China template for you to see if "FoP does apply to this photograph".... "Fae is allowed to reproduce this work if the author and the name of the original statue is attributed." Are you allowed to reproduce it? No. You don't need legal cases for a law to exist. --99of9 (talk) 11:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- That would be great thanks, we might want to create a category of Category:Fae's laws. ;-) --Fæ (talk) 12:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Let me slightly remix the bolded words on the FoP-China template for you to see if "FoP does apply to this photograph".... "Fae is allowed to reproduce this work if the author and the name of the original statue is attributed." Are you allowed to reproduce it? No. You don't need legal cases for a law to exist. --99of9 (talk) 11:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- We should also recognize that copyright law is subject to interpretation and pragmatism in implementation. Nobody has yet to point to any real-life legal cases based on a failure of attribution under the FoP act for China. FoP does apply to this photograph, so it is only this detail that remains. Should the creator ever come forward then the remedy would be to add the attribution, as the photograph itself is correctly covered by FoP, there can be no particular damage from it being public so long as this is not denied. It would be great if someone interested in this part of IP law in China could provide some relevant case law to illuminate the Commons guidelines. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- There's no "allowable time" to host a copyvio - it's like all other copyright, if you aren't compliant, you're violating the copyright laws. There is already a digitally photographed copy of the statue, and now copies of that on two media hosts. We are already reusing the statue! Commons tends to give some (usually 7 days) grace to fix up errors, but that has been well exceeded for these images. The Chinese law doesn't say "you should ask around and hope that eventually one of your friends comes up with the correct attribution". --99of9 (talk) 11:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: I guess we can restore if it is identified FASTILY (TALK) 22:57, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
One of the conditions of FoP China is that the author and the name of the original work must be attributed. This is not despite some research (see User_talk:Fæ#FoP-China). 99of9 (talk) 09:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Comment per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A picture from China every day 043.jpg. --Fæ (talk) 09:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
One of the conditions of FoP China is that the author of the original work must be attributed. This is not despite some research (see User_talk:Fæ#FoP-China). 99of9 (talk) 09:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Comment per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A picture from China every day 043.jpg. --Fæ (talk) 09:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SCOPE 99of9 (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abstracts (1) (Imagicity 1096).jpg. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 08:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
_(Imagicity_1096).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Scaled-down duplicate of File:Chantal HELENBECK.jpg. Froztbyte (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Question If this image is deleted will this linke [fail]? It may be that the user made the thumbnail perhaps not knowing how to do that correctly from the bigger image? Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I moved this from English Wikipedia, but just realised that this might be wrong due to COM:FOP#Indonesia. Do you see enough of w:Achmad Yani International Airport for this to be a copyvio? Stefan4 (talk) 14:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Jay.png. Froztbyte (talk) 23:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Of the two I'd keep "Jay C. Hoffman.jpg" as I think the user's intent may have been to fix the name of the original image to "Jay C. Hoffman" instead of "Jay" but not known how to do that. Just my 2cents. But yes, one or the other has to go. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Declined speedy requested by McGeddon (talk · contribs); suspect logo is eligible for {{PD-textlogo}} Эlcobbola talk 17:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per decline reason. Эlcobbola talk 17:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of company with questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - at the time of the original nomination, the image was in an article; was the article deleted for lack of notability? The company purports to have relationship with notable firms (e.g., Office Depot and Carrefour) and a quick Google search suggests some (albeit minimal) third-party coverage. I don't see the harm in keeping a PD logo around given that there are some hints of notability. However, if the aforementioned article can be found and was indeed deleted for notability issues, I'd be willing to reconsider. Эlcobbola talk 15:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisardojm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.flickr.com/photos/celtabaloncesto/2870158706/in/set-72157607369928376
Converted by me to DR, as the image on Flickr (higher resolution) was uploaded several months later than this version (lower quality/resolution) to Commons. Therefore, they may have a common source. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I can't see how this could be "educationally useful". It was just used by a vandal on en.wiki which I think is the only possible use for it. Smartse (talk) 22:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep That an image has been misued by a vandal is not a reason for deletion, nor is that an image contains sexually explicit material. Categories on image suggest in scope usefullness. That said, no evident reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't say that because it had been used for vandalism it should be deleted - I said that that is pretty much the only thing it could be used for. I'm not too familiar with deletion discussions here, but to me this is a prime example of "self-created artwork without obvious educational use". Can you provide a counter to that? Smartse (talk) 19:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Question This isn't someone's personally created 3D digital art, this was posed in a game environment and then touched up in Photoshop. Do we consider which game this was copied from as copyright? Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Do you mean it is a screenshot? If so, then it must be a copyright violation unless the program is freeware. I can't see the source for some reason, but the uploader's other pieces of artwork were made with this which isn't freeware. Smartse (talk) 19:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm really familiar with Poser. I looked at the other images in the flickr series and I don't think the user who uploaded this image to flickr made it. If you look at the images on both sides of it in the stream, you see totally different backgrounds and a lot sharper pixelation. The modeling items he uses for feet and hands are very different. His base reflectivity is totally different in serveral of the other pictures. I think this is a mesh-game screenshot, unless there's some serious documentation that the flickr user made it which I don't see in his comments below the picture, I think this one is from a game. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Do you mean it is a screenshot? If so, then it must be a copyright violation unless the program is freeware. I can't see the source for some reason, but the uploader's other pieces of artwork were made with this which isn't freeware. Smartse (talk) 19:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable copyvio as a screenshot MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
_(Imagicity_1096).jpg){kind=link}
_(Imagicity_1096).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SCOPE 99of9 (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
_(Imagicity_1096).jpg){kind=link}
- Could you explain a bit more, this would seem to be useful for colourful illustration? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 01:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Colourful illustration is not our scope, educational projects are. It would be trivial to get a computer to generate a million similar "colourful illustrations" (of higher quality because they would be svg) if they were actually useful for educating anyone. The good news is that we already have many many images in Category:Colors that are educational. As a general rule, when a non-notable artist titles something "abstract", that's usually a strong implication that even they don't know of an educational purpose for their image.--99of9 (talk) 01:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, okay I understand the rationale. In this case, there may be a misunderstanding as this is not a computer graphic, but a photograph of a real store-front display. This makes it rather more interesting than a generated colourful illustration and I believe would make it eligible under scope as an example of striking and geometric simple store-front displays as well as potentially useful for an educational purpose. For this reason I think the small set of photos of store-fronts are suitable for Keep. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 08:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- There is no misunderstanding. I said I *could* create higher quality colourful illustrations (your words) very easily, if I actually thought anyone would benefit educationally from it. If you want to illustrate colourful store fronts, then I'm afraid you forgot to include the store.--99of9 (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- No problem, this was from a store front in Melbourne. I'm sure if we ask Graham he will tell us which shop it was. If I go to the effort of doing this, would that resolve your concern for this set of unusual photographs? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 10:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- No it wouldn't, because to be useful as an educational picture of colourful store fronts (if that is a topic about which someone might want to be educated), the photograph would need to show a store front. Frankly, I think you're grasping at straws with no clearly definable potential educational purpose. This is simply an abstract photo, of a graphic design. It's pretty, but not in scope. --99of9 (talk) 11:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- I just think that there is a reasonable interpretation of scope that covers this photograph. It is not my photograph, I would not be devastated if it gets deleted. I agree with you, it looks good, and it is from a photographer with a good track record of high quality photographs. I'm sorry if you feel that is grasping at straws, I would rather say that we have different interpretations of the details of where the boundaries of project scope lie. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- No it wouldn't, because to be useful as an educational picture of colourful store fronts (if that is a topic about which someone might want to be educated), the photograph would need to show a store front. Frankly, I think you're grasping at straws with no clearly definable potential educational purpose. This is simply an abstract photo, of a graphic design. It's pretty, but not in scope. --99of9 (talk) 11:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- No problem, this was from a store front in Melbourne. I'm sure if we ask Graham he will tell us which shop it was. If I go to the effort of doing this, would that resolve your concern for this set of unusual photographs? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 10:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- There is no misunderstanding. I said I *could* create higher quality colourful illustrations (your words) very easily, if I actually thought anyone would benefit educationally from it. If you want to illustrate colourful store fronts, then I'm afraid you forgot to include the store.--99of9 (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, okay I understand the rationale. In this case, there may be a misunderstanding as this is not a computer graphic, but a photograph of a real store-front display. This makes it rather more interesting than a generated colourful illustration and I believe would make it eligible under scope as an example of striking and geometric simple store-front displays as well as potentially useful for an educational purpose. For this reason I think the small set of photos of store-fronts are suitable for
- Colourful illustration is not our scope, educational projects are. It would be trivial to get a computer to generate a million similar "colourful illustrations" (of higher quality because they would be svg) if they were actually useful for educating anyone. The good news is that we already have many many images in Category:Colors that are educational. As a general rule, when a non-notable artist titles something "abstract", that's usually a strong implication that even they don't know of an educational purpose for their image.--99of9 (talk) 01:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus to delete FASTILY 07:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
_(Imagicity_1096).jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Couverture d'un livre
Converted by me to DR, as the only copyrightable element of the cover, the map, looks rather old to me. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- It's the cover of a French book (Couverture d'un livre), I do not know the rules but I am not sure that a book cover is allowed ? Xavxav (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- The question is not "book cover", but the artwork on the book cover, in this case the map. Can anyone identify and date it? --Túrelio (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Its a Map of the french coast, there's Saint-Jean-de-Luz and Bayonne in it. Its at least from 18th century, most likely older. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 22:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- The question is not "book cover", but the artwork on the book cover, in this case the map. Can anyone identify and date it? --Túrelio (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)