Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/02/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 10th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright UI MJ94 (talk) 05:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by INeverCry as "Screenshot of non-free content" whym (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rude language Flor!an (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Granted request to delete (unused) redirect Materialscientist (talk) 12:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Blackfish (talk) 14:06, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: misleading redirect Julo (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine cover is likely still copyrighted, whereby this photo is a copyviolating derivative of it. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eir aoi(Japanese famous singer) doesn't officially reveal her career as a gravure idol or that she harmed her body before. So, I think this picture can make her reputation bad. Facial expression (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  OpposeThis file is mine picture of offcial.She harmd her body widely known many people.

So this picture carries on wiki story very significant.--Ggjjkkee (talk) 09:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(To Ggjjkkee) If you think so, please explain why there is the same picture on a private website[1] as this. And you doesn't verify the picture you uploaded is your own work. The another picture on the website is introduced as the gravure idol, Yui Arisawa, who doesn't show that she is now working as the singer named Eir Aoi. Therefore, this picture is against Commons:Photographs of identifiable people#Moral issues.--Facial expression (talk) 13:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: From http://vanishingview.tumblr.com/post/48479571/idol-factory Yann (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misleading redirect after renaming file Blackfish (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: misleading redirect Julo (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misleading redirect after renaming file Blackfish (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: misleading redirect Julo (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misleading redirect after renaming file Blackfish (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: misleading redirect Julo (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misleading redirect after renaming file Blackfish (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: misleading redirect Julo (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misleading redirect after renaming file Blackfish (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: misleading redirect Julo (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blur and unusable photo of unknown location in BiH. Smooth_O (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is indeed a useless file, it would have been picked up during cleanup russavia (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

j'ai été induit en erreur par un article de wikipedia le droit d'auteur est de 80 ans après la mort en Espagne (1879-1987) et cet artiste est de nationalité espagnole je demande le retrait de l'image Jlvenet (talk) 20:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleted by Anthere (not yet in public domain) Dereckson (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

j'ai été induit en erreur par un article de wikipedia le droit d'auteur est de 80 ans après la mort en Espagne (1879-1942) et cet artiste est de nationalité espagnole je demande le retrait de l'image Jlvenet (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC) .[reply]



Deleted: Deleted by Anthere (not yet in public domain) Dereckson (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mort en 1942, nationalité espagnole durée des droits d'auteur en Espagne : 80 ans. Oeuvre dont la publication initiale est dans un pays inconnu, peut-être l'espagne ? Trop d'incertitudes, en résumé je ne suis pas certain d'avoir versé une oeuvre du domaine public Jlvenet (talk) 21:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attention, il convient d'être préçis : le droit d'auteur en Espagne est aujourd'hui de 70 ans, pas de 80. Il était de 80 ans pour les oeuvres publiées avant 1987 (ce qui est le cas de l'image). La législation consolidée espagnole est disponible, traduite en anglais sur http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=11050 --Dereckson (talk) 10:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oui merci, l'autre problème, le plus gênant finalement (cf ma page de discussion), c'est que nous n'arrivons pas à définir la date à laquelle cette affiche a été initialement créée. C'est entre 1915 et 1930 mais il est difficile d'être précis. Il est possible qu'elle soit antérieure à 1923 tout comme l'inverse est également possible. Gaspar Camps a créé une autre affiche pour le papier à cigarettes JOB en 1915 et réalisé d'autres travaux pour des marques de papier à cigarettes, mais pas de trace de cette affiche. Puis, dans la bibliographie de Gaspar Camps, nous trouvons bien cette affiche mais pour une marque de boisson alcoolisée (ayant utilisé le même modèle) et elle semble dater de 1930 (au vu du numéro de téléphone à Barcelone supérieur à 10000). Certes les affiches avaient de multiples tirages échelonnés dans le temps, parfois sur 10 à 20 ans mais malheureusement il ne nous est pas possible de trouver la date du tirage initial de cette rare affiche pour JOB.--Jlvenet (talk) 21:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
On peut tenter un contacter avec le service presse si l'entreprise existe toujours.
Si pas nous pouvons prendre une position prudente et restaurer à la plus lointaine des dates entre 95 ans après la date maximale où il est plausible que l'affiche aie été publié (pour les US, l'affiche n'étant pas dans le domaine public en 1996) et 2023 (pour l'Espagne). Bon maintenant si la publication a eu lieu dans un autre pays que l'Espagne, sans qu'il le soit dans les 30 jours en Espagne, ce sera alors max(pub + 95, 2013) : c'est le pays de publication d'une oeuvre qui compte. --Dereckson (talk) 18:05, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merci Dereckson. Pour le service presse de JOB je pense que nous n'aurons rien , j'avais moi-même créé un site Internet, un musée virtuel sur la Collection JOB au début des années 2000 et nous avions eu des rapports avec l'entreprise mais cette affiche n'était pas encore retrouvée. Pour le reste, je vous remercie de l'explication technique même si pour moi cela reste obscure (je ne comprends pas bien l'explication , je croyais avoir compris que pour être dans le domaine public elle devait avoir été publiée avant 1923, pardonnez mon ignorance je n'ai pas l'habitude de Commons et des droits d'auteur et je ne sais que conclure des dates que vous affichez). Tout ce que je peux dire c'est que l'affiche est une commande de JOB, entreprise française, qu'elle a été imprimée soit à Toulouse, par l'imprimerie Sirven, soit à Barcelone, où Sirven a, un temps, eu une succursale ; Gaspar Camps était directeur artistique chez Sirven (en France comme en Espagne). L'entreprise Sirven n'existe plus. Seul Gaspar Camps a des descendants, à Barcelone et la biographe Gloria Escala i Romeu a écrit un livre bien documenté en catalan.Mais que cette affiche était destinée à l'export puisque le slogan, qui doit vouloir dire fumez le JOB (enfin supposition) est en arabe, il me semble. Et le reste je l'ai déjà écrit (JOB a passé au moins une commande à Gaspar Camps en 1915, sans certitude que cette affiche y figure, et cette affiche a été utilisée par d'autres marques,notamment en 1930 pour une marque d'anis). Qu'en conclure ? --Jlvenet (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
La matière est en effet complexe.
Chaque pays a une législation différente, avec une durée de droit d'auteur (et donc une date d'entrée dans le domaine public) différente.
Wikimedia Commons a choisi de respecter pour chaque photo deux législations :
(1) Le droit US, où en effet toute photo publiée avant 1923 est dans le domaine public ;
(2) Le droit du pays d'origine de la photo. J'aurais tendance à choisir arbitrairement la France, s'agissant d'une production de quelqu'un semblant résider en France pour une entreprise française: je présume que même si la publication visait un pays parlant l'arabe, l'affiche fera au même moment l'objet d'une publication quelque part en France chez JOB pour montrer l'affiche au sein de l'entreprise.
Pourriez-vous me donner votre meilleure estimation de la tranche d'années où la photo a plus que très probablement été publiée ou cela reste en conclusion 1915-1930 ? --Dereckson (talk) 10:39, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, j'ai étudié à nouveau la question mais malheureusement sur la base des éléments factuels dont je dispose je ne peux être plus précis que : "première publication entre 1915 et 1930." --Jlvenet (talk) 11:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete En résumé, l'image n'est pas dans le domaine public aux Etats-Unis, ou du moins a des risques de ne pas l'être. Il faut supprimer la page--Jlvenet (talk) 12:43, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voici la synthèse de toutes mes recherches. Cette affiche a été imprimée par Sirven à Toulouse, ce qui laisserait à penser une édition vers 1915 mais la seule référence précise à cette affiche, à ce jour, est celle figurant dans le livre de Gloria Escala I Romeu, Gaspar Camps, Gent Nostra, Infiesta Editor, lien éditeur=http://www.gentnostra.cat, année=2004, page 77, isbn 8493358908, où l'affiche est présentée pour une publicité Anis Antich avec une adresse et un numéro de téléphone à Barcelone, Telephono 10165. Après recherches, ce numéro était attribué à Barcelone vers 1930 mais pas avant 1923. En conséquence, comme il n'a vraiment pas été possible de trouver une preuve ancienne de tirage, pas avant 1923, il est malheureusement nécessaire de supprimer cette photo. Je propose la clôture de la discussion et le retrait de cette photo (que j'avais moi-même versée), un administrateur pour s'en charger ? --Jlvenet (talk) 12:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not yet in public domain. Author is dead in 1942, not yet in public domain in source country in 1996, so will be in public in US domain 95 years after publication. In the worst case, publication date is 1930. So to restore in 2026. --Dereckson (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist bereits als File:Assler 02.jpg vorhanden. Koppchen (talk) 21:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied as duplicate per uploader's wish. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been given a caption called "Gurdwara tutti gandi sahib" which is very offensive as it is stating a religious shrine of sikhs as "tutti gandi" which mean dirty faeces. This is being used in a certain article to portray a Gurdwara as "tutti gandi" or dirty faeces. Which is offensive and also may mislead and create misconceptions to others who read an article that includes this picture. Knowledgeispower111 (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Renamed. Yann (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the old picture of the Gurudwara. Mks.ra (talk) 13:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No valid reason for deletion. In use on many projects. --Achim55 (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Why do so many people want to delete every more or less old picture? I don't understand this obsession with newness and wiping the historical record clean. Where does that come from? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Achim and Ikan Kekek.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:36, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 22:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it below the Commons:Threshold of originality? Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 00:19, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Only text and simple shapes. --McZusatz (talk) 14:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cameta as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo not only text INeverCry 00:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal image for non-notable company. GrapedApe (talk) 01:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused logo for non-notable company. No real possibility of educational value. GrapedApe (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the coat of arms of the Russian Federation, not the byzantine empire as the name suggests, and it's being put on the Italian article for the Kings of SSardinia. None of these things are releted, thus no scope. Also "own work" is doubtful and an SVG of the Russian arms exists. Fry1989 eh? 01:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Very clearly Russia's coat of arms. Uploader could instead use something in Category:Coats of arms of the Byzantine Empire --moogsi (blah) 09:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate (a low resolution version of File:Lee Joon (MBLAQ).jpg) Puramyun31 (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 02:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 02:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source was deleted. Takabeg (talk) 03:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Armenia. Takabeg (talk) 04:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: now FOP in Armenia - Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard&oldid=96202242--Steinsplitter (talk) 11:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Morning (talk) 04:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was a botched copy to Commons, Commons Helper didn't put in the full name. It's used on an article on enwiki. I asked for the move since the original is still on use at enwiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3A%22Obay%22_poster_%28Toronto_bus_shelter_-_2008%29.jpg Free images that are in-use belong on Commons, no? Or did something change? 220.238.53.93 07:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, the Commons file is not in use, but it has the potential to replace the en.wikipedia file that illustrates the article, so I think you're basically correct that scope would not be a reason for deletion. However, copyright of one or both unlicensed ads might be a problem. I suppose an argument could be made that the original ad is not entirely visible and that the text on the other ad is uncopyrightable, but I don't know if that is the case. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but the reason I proposed the file rename was so that the deletion on enwiki would go through. M.O.X (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is enough text here to have a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:DW Morning (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

as a newbie to Commons I would appreciate more explanation. From reading the page on derivative works I am assuming its because there is a picture of the subject on the banner. I guess I'd like more explanation -seems borderline to me but I certainly don't claim to be an expert. Rikster2 (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of scope Morning (talk) 04:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Azerbaijan, no freedom of panorama for Azerbaijan. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 04:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Azerbaijan, no freedom of panorama for Azerbaijan. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 04:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of scope Morning (talk) 04:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope Morning (talk) 04:54, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

borrar copia Nexcoyotl (talk) 04:55, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Copy of what? .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete copy. Nexcoyotl (talk) 20:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We have two versions of this image which are the same pixel size:
File:José Ma. Morelos y Pavón ca. 1813.png
File:José Ma. Morelos y Pavón, ca. 1813.jpg

They are identical, but the jpg is a smaller file and we generally use jpg for continuous tone images. Therefore I think we should keep the jpg which is the subject of this DR and delete the png. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 To delete a lower quality of the same file (that you uploaded) as in this case, pelase use {{Speedy}} instead. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted dupe -FASTILY 23:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Azerbaijan, no freedom of panorama for Azerbaijan. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 05:12, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also File:Song theater in Baku.jpg

Per COM:FOP#Azerbaijan, no freedom of panorama for Azerbaijan. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete copy. Xiuhtecuhtli (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Copy of what? .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Kazakhstan, no freedom of panorama for Kazakhstan. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Azerbaijan, no freedom of panorama for Azerbaijan. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 05:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also File:Fountain on Baku Boulevard - 3.JPG and File:Fountain on Baku Boulevard.JPG

Per COM:FOP#Azerbaijan, no freedom of panorama for Azerbaijan. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 05:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per this discussion; usage replaced. -- Tuválkin 06:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like flickrwashing, see for instance here (higher resolution). Lymantria (talk) 08:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded the image at the request of the photographer, Chris Fanning, the copyright holder, who wishes to release the image at this resolution to creative commons as noted on his Flickr page. For instance, here is his portrait of Koons on the Deutsche Bank website, properly credited by Chris Fanning: http://db-artmag.com/de/70/news/surreale-produktlandschaften-jeff-koons-in-frankfurt/?dbiquery=1%3Akoons Lauranrothstein (talk) 21:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In that case a written permission through the OTRS is missing and necessary. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 15:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept OTRS 2013030710009145 .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of Flickr-user; looks like capture from screen/movie. Image was uploaded to Flickr 1 hours before being uploaded to Commons. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. This image is the derivative work of another image which is used in numerous websites (e. g. PDK-Xoybûn. There is no proof of {{GFDL}}. Takabeg (talk) 09:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio. I think the uploader is not the copyright holder. sample. There is no proof of {{Self}}. Takabeg (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW, collection of images whose sources and permission aren't known. Takabeg (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW, collection of images whose sources and permission aren't known. Takabeg (talk) 10:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction (derivative) of painting by painter Dezider Milly, who died only in 1971. Painting thereby protected til end of 2041. Photo violates copyright of Dezider Milly (or his heirs). -- Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some problem with:


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. Cloudz679 (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I would keep this particular image. Can become a nice picture of a yacht.

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Commons is not Facebook. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

definitely not two-dimensional, hence PD-art is not applicable FA2010 (talk) 12:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Nachricht, welche Begründungen werden denn dem Löschantrag oder der Löschung zu grunde gelegt?
Ach so, es ist mir übrigens völlig gleich wenn das Bild gelöscht werden soll! Wenn es nötig ist bitte sofort, subito. Besten Dank. Habe keinen Einwand gegen diese Ansinnen. zusasa
Thanks for inform me, and the justifications for the delete request.

I have absolutely no problem with it, if the image would be deleted. If it is necessary please do it immediately, subito. Thank you. zusasa


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. License to publish a reading here? Also the reading contains a mentioning of jews being deported which is not in the original, cf. http://de.wikiquote.org/wiki/Martin_Niem%C3%B6ller Vsop.de (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In order to make the spoken version of the poem I used the text of "First they came..." from the page: ru:Нимёллер, Мартин. Yes, I see the strange difference between texts from Russian Wikipedia and de.wikiquote... What text is more correct? And en.wikiquote also has one more version of the text: [2]...?!
"License to publish a reading here?" I didn't catch. Do you mean that the whole "Spoken Wikipedia" is a copyright infringement? Information about license is presented at the page of audio file: cc-by-3.0. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I see no evidence that we have the prmission of Niemoller's heirs to quote his material. It is an infringement whether we show text or spoken words. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation, obviously invalid license. Lifted from subject's Facebook page as credited here [3] The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation. This is the subject's official YouTube icon The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For God's sake, it's got the copyright stated on the image itself, and it's from the subject's official Facebook page. Obvious copyvio that's been hanging around for six months. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 13:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Morocco. 84.61.133.236 13:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wholly implausible license from an uploader with a track record of phony licenses, see [4] The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a recent sculpture, though sculptor isn't mentioned in the description. As Belgium has no freedom-of-panorama exemption this photo violates the copyright of the sculptor. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same statue shown in File:Tour des Finances.jpg, though here one might eventually consider de minimis. Sculptor seems to be "'Fonderia D'Arte De Andreis, Milano"[5].



Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a recent sculpture by living sculptor Olivier Strebelle. As Belgium has no freedom-of-panorama exemption this photo violates the copyright of the sculptor. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a recent work by living sculptor Olivier Strebelle. As Belgium has no freedom-of-panorama exemption this photo violates the copyright of the sculptor. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Yes, I agree. Frédéric (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No, deletion would violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Jos met zijn bromfiets (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that's nonsense. This is about copyright, not about freedom of speech. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, it violates the first Amendment to the United States Constitution Jos met zijn bromfiets (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of meaningless lamenting, how about contacting the artist Olivier Strebelle and ask him for permission? --Túrelio (talk) 10:08, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep this dialog friendly Turelio Jos met zijn bromfiets (talk) 10:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mój błąd w nazwie - literówka. Jest już plik z poprawną nazwą, a ten winien być usunięty. Pazura999 (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I had the wrong drawing Toilet (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visible pattern in image suggests that it was shot from TV screen, which would make it a copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ownership by uploader somewhat questionable as the same image has been posted earlier at http://www.privatamateure.com/profile/ChrissyEast, http://chrissyeast.ganz-nackt.com/ and other websites. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fair use (logo) Lazyhawk (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Looks like a very simple logo. INeverCry 00:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User says its own work, but no Metadata, and user is subject of a copyright investigation. Wizardman 15:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. And no license. Martin H. (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, blurry and without evidence of permission from identifiable depicted persons; also found at http://especialmujer.tv/videos-ext/J8RQY-_341U-er-tico-modelo-models-boutique-hermoso-maestr-a-salud-m-dico-modelo-lvaro-carranza-montalvo. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 15:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, I`ve check that the CC0 is just for the metadata not for the picture, sorry Nachosan (talk) 15:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, I`ve check that the CC0 is just for the metadata not for the picture, sorry Nachosan (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, I`ve check that the CC0 is just for the metadata not for the picture, sorry Nachosan (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, I`ve check that the CC0 is just for the metadata not for the picture, sorry Nachosan (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, I`ve check that the CC0 is just for the metadata not for the picture, sorry Nachosan (talk) 15:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, I`ve check that the CC0 is just for the metadata not for the picture, sorry Nachosan (talk) 15:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, I`ve check that the CC0 is just for the metadata not for the picture, sorry Nachosan (talk) 15:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, I`ve check that the CC0 is just for the metadata not for the picture, sorry Nachosan (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 16:05, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of scope Morning (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Kosovo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Kosovo now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 17:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is an un-needed redirect George Orwell III (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for self-AD file S-PAI (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of company with questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW applies Morning (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is an illustration of a logo of a commercial bank. It may be copyrighted under India laws, even though it only consists of simple geometric shapes. The font used may also be a custom drawn font (i.e. not open source or free license fonts). Syed (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: TOO is low in India .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name (according to coordinates, this picture does not show Heiligenhaus but something else and I don't remember what) Hyperdieter (talk) 16:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It might be Tönisheide, a part of en:Velbert. --Hyperdieter (talk) 17:40, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I asked to rename the picture. Deletion request may be removed. --Hyperdieter (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
renamed to File:Blick vom Panoramaradweg auf Velbert-Tönisheide.jpg--Steinsplitter (talk) 21:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 17:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal photo Mjrmtg (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal photo Mjrmtg (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chairman Sant Bhupinder Singh. Photo from Sant Ishar Singh Gurmat Academy Thuresson (talk) 18:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All global versions of file have been converted to PNG format 70.139.57.253 18:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That is not a reason to delete this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this file because I created it months ago and I'm saying my full name in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.249.79.28 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 10. Feb. 2013‎ (UTC)

 Oppose It's true, he is telling his full name and his user name at the end of the recording. But he did the same in the file description page. He [[[:Template:Fullurl::]] removed his name] just a few days ago after more than a year. I don't have a problem with that. He does not want to see his full name any more when googling it (personality rights). That's fine. But please don't delete your nice recordings because of that. You are free to do new recordings and upload them instead. --TMg 18:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose That is no reason for deletion. It is as TMg says. Apart from that: If the problem is only the name at the end of the file, you can edit it, cut these seconds out and re-upload it. --88.130.100.138 13:19, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Armenia. This building was designed by Edmond Tigranian who died in 1994. Takabeg (talk) 19:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: now FOP in Armenia - Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard&oldid=96202242--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to reupload as the owner CamiMac (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: According to the description, this is a work by Daniel Belardinelli. There is no evidence that you have permission to license it, as that would have to come from the copyright holder, Daniel Belardinelli. DO NOT upload this file again without first getting a license from Daniel Belardinelli using the procedure at Commons:OTRS .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only in attack page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and also File:1522870.jpg and File:Emurphy.png. DS (talk) 20:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 80.140.173.126 as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsverletzung Datei ist ein Bild von mir und nicht für Wikipedia gedacht
Converted by me to DR in order to allow a discussion of the IP's somewhat strange claim of ownership about a photo that was uploaded 1.5 years ago by User:Maparial using the same camera model as for his other uploads. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

сомнения в лицензии и авторстве, есть аналогичные копии в Интернете http://contiguouszone.ucoz.com/, http://www.teatrkomediant.3nx.ru/viewtopic.php?t=7&view=next Dogad75 (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of photo on exposition panel; file had already been deleted earlier (File:Affiche de l'exposition "Collection Jean Planque" au musée Granet à Aix-en-Provence.jpg) as derivative of non-free content. No freedom-of-panorama exemption in France, as had already been explained earlier to the uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:54, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cette demande de suppression est abusive ! Il s'agit de la photographie de la façade du musée Granet devant laquelle il y a un panneau d'information, qui n'est pas une oeuvre en tant que telle. Est-ce que l'entreprise qui l'a fabriqué a déposé un copyright ? 21:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Dans tous les cas, ne prenez pas cette procédure comme une attaque personnelle. Sauf que c'est toujours le même contributeur qui intervient, sans explication probante. Je demande l'arbitrage de DocteurCosmos. Cordialement et courtoisement, [[Utilisateur:Arcane17|Arcane17]] (talk) 22:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: The photograph cleary infringes on the copyright of the sign. This is very plain and straightforward -- there is nothing to argue about here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 22:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr copyvio - a CD cover, still under copyright - see http://www.amazon.com/Philip-Film-Filmworks-Glass/dp/B00005O1EU for example Bencherlite (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A rookie user created it as a PNG but afted being advertised he reuploaded it as a SVG at File:Líneas de explotación comercial de la alta velocidad en España.svg. Once Commons has the SVG version we don't need the duplicated PNG version. HrAd (talk) 22:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We do not generally delete raster files that pre-date the vector file, but this is very recent, so I have chosen to delete it somewhat against policy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:01, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: Biography, personal cv or similar document in plain text format. If the content is on a notable subject it should be integrated into the relevant wikiproject, for example Wikipedia for Biographies. In case it is not on a notable subject: Wikimedia Commons is not designed for personal promotion. Basvb (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 10:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Deniss 28 October 2015. --Achim (talk) 11:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Achim (talk) 11:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:17, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 23:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emonyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josiedavis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios.

Jespinos (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wpanupvrm123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album

High Contrast (talk) 12:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camitinoco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The article about Christian Vélez was deleted on the Spanish Wikipedia and the reason given was lack of notability. Hence, these images are out of project scope.

Jespinos (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album

High Contrast (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Álvaro Miguel Carranza Montalvo (talk · contribs)

Out of project scope: no encyclopedic value

High Contrast (talk) 00:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lesvospf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are pictures published by:
© Copyright 2006, All rights reserved - Natural History Museum of the Lesvos Petrified Forest

eg. http://www.lesvosmuseum.gr/site/home/ws/primary+menu/education/programmata_scholikon_monadon.csp;jsessionid=F8C42E6C5217090BBED550BD0779C391#

So they must be deleted. --C messier (talk) 14:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edwar Alberto Martinez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Memiteam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vocdat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of album covers/logos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panistatijuana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alejandronavarretelanner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handisam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davis Jimenez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The images appear to be part of a hoax.

Jespinos (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Me duele la cabeza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios.

Jespinos (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magic Management (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private picture of user, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergeyyalo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private picture of user, out of project scope.

Martin H. (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rosa Maria Morales (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Look like scans of a magazine or a fashion catalogue.

Jespinos (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rosa Maria Morales (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of clip-art, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

pues yo creo que las imágenes deberían ser borradas pues como no le entiendo como subir fotografías y espero de su ayuda


Deleted: per nom. -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Petrfoppa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The images have low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own works.

Jespinos (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Petrfoppa (talk · contribs)

Instead of counter-arguing, the user keeps uploading images with uncertain copyright status.

Jespinos (talk) 23:48, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It's arguable that all of these files are under the threshold of originality

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: This is a very broad nomination. It would be better if these were split up by country or something. I don't have time to comment on each right now, but some obvious ones:--EEIM (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: some logos like this was upload beacuse on english wikipedia says :and I quote: This is a candidate to be copied to Wikimedia Commons. Freely licensed or public domain media are more accessible to other Wikimedia projects if placed on Commons. Any user may perform this move—please see Moving images to the Commons for more information please won't put this information again ,so you make me waste my time.--EEIM (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

this got over the discussion.

most of logos are too simple example--EEIM (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This first statement is more of a caution to EEIM and other persons who transfer files from other projects to here; there are many times images are marked for transfer but may not actually be able to be moved. So the responsibility is yours to decide if a move is good or not. Anyways, I agree with the deletion of File:Casi discovery military.JPG because it is very low quality version (like an Inkscape trace) and it is unused. I am going to look at the other files and write down my thoughts on them. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 22:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alot of these are too simple, they should have been done in groups or individually, not all together. File:The DirecTV logo.png is definitely a  Keep Fry1989 eh? 03:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment: I don't agree upload images with just words,a lot of companies have logos without (take out) image,for exemple Qatar foundation is a sponsor F.C. Barcelona and on t shirt says qatar fountation non-tree.

I don't agree with fair use ,it's an illegal way to be legal, but it will do on englishwiki,because wikipedia from usa and americans (from usa) have paid this project,at least the most or half.

For us (wikipedia commons) free images,thereby ,i delete copyright and left image free, see even at airports ,tv,magazines,etc,we see that logos,and everybody know them


Kept: Some of these should be deleted, but a mass DR that crosses countries is beyond our ability to handle. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sourced to Flickr which doesn't tell where the images come from. There is no evidence that the photographers are anonymous and there is no information about the age of the images at all.

Stefan4 (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


these files,is long time,copyright has expired. author is unknown.--EEIM (talk) 03:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the copyright holder most likely they are dead.is too difficult say the source. is pd old,at Flickr anyone upload files,in this case copyright has expired,and they uploaded,i cant say is mine,and i put as source Flickr.--EEIM (talk) 03:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please read:and notice last point --EEIM (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC) {{PD-Colombia}}[reply]

These images are free in its home country, Colombia.--EEIM (talk) 04:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can you tell that the photos are old enough, when the source doesn't even say how old they are? --Stefan4 (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answer:reading --EEIM (talk) 06:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)http://www.cucutanuestra.com/temas/fotos_cucuta/1900_1930/cucuta_1900_1930.htm[reply]

The page [6] is useless for determining the copyright status of the images since the page appears to contain images from various sources without telling where the images come from. You need to check that website's sources too. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you're right but just in one delete this took in 1952.--EEIM (talk) 06:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons -FASTILY 11:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering recently "enlarged" User talk:EEIM (Panoramio/etc. grabber). File:Valle de Cúcuta.jpg with exif: Canon PowerShot A640 --> mysteriously only 1 time used in his X k uploads.

Gunnex (talk) 13:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely not own work, COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9   17:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EEIM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos above COM:TOO. For Discovery Channel cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:DiscoveryChannel logo.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Discovery-Channel-logo.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Casi discovery hd.JPG and so on.

Sealle (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia. Is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia

File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia. Image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia.

File:AZ Corazón logo.svg and others are image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. Simple logo

File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. Simple logo

File:Discovery Channel logo.svg is a simple logo of official logo . this has copyright.

File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg simple logo with map. map have copyright?.

File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg looks like OK, but Im not sure. --EEIM (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg which is in the public domain since it is a public entity in Colombia. No copyright is infringed in any way and the logo can be uploaded on Commons with no probs. Keep also for File:AZ Corazón logo.svg which its vector variant was made from scratch and it is not eligible for copyright. The same applies for File:AZ Tv De Paga logo.svg and File:AZ Click! logo.svg which were also made from scratch and can't be copyrighteable. For File:Discovery Channel en Español logo.svg, I give it a keep since the world icon on the channel's logo is not elaborate enough to be claimed as WP:TOO, and thus it stays. It is also the case for File:Inter-american Development Bank logo.svg. However, for File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg, the world icon is a bit complex for a simple image, but I would still give it a pass. File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg itself is a public insignia, not eligible for copyright regardless of how complex it is, according to Colombian laws. File:Discovery Channel logo.svg is not complex enough to be labelled as WP:TOO, so it passes anyway. For File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg, the logo is in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, not eligible for copyright either. File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg consists on simple geometric lines, not compatible with the threshold for originality, so the image stays. --Bankster (talk) 16:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep for File:Olympic Committee (Colombia) logo.svg because it is a public entity in Colombia. The logo doesn't infringe a copyright infringement and can be uploaded in commons. File:Colombia National Civil Registry logo.svg is in the public domain, because It is a public entity owned by the government of Colombia. File:AZ Corazón logo.svg image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. File:Piedmont Airlines logo.svg image only consists of simple image and text. File:Discovery Channel logo.svg the world icon on the channel's logo is not elaborated enough to be claimed as WP: TOO, and thus it stays, the same goes for File:Discovery Channel 1995 - 2000 logo.svg. Finally, File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg the logo is in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, and doesn't have copyrights. Futbolero44 (talk) 06:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete for File:Farc Colombia Party logo.svg. Should be a speedy deletion actually, since it is a recreation of deleted content. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:FARC party logo.png for the most recent nomination and links to past uploads before that. Bankster's comment above about this logo being "in the public domain for being a political party's insignia, not eligible for copyright either". This is not true. There is no copyright exemption in the US or Colombia for "political party insignia", nor any suggestion that political parties cannot be holders of intellectual property/copyrights. In fact, the party that created this logo releases all of their material under a CC no-derivatives license. seb26 (talk) 22:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, kept one for being below TOO. --Jcb (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich bin der Inhaber dieses Fotos. Es hat sich Beziehungstechnisch etwas geändert und wir sind nicht mehr befreundet Blackburn2001 (talk) 16:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have given us the right to use this photo and there is no option for withdrawal. --Polarlys (talk) 18:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:25, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Tina Schüßler mit Freund Paul Metz.JPG

Ich bin der Inhaber dieses Fotos. Es hat sich Beziehungstechnisch etwas geändert und wir sind nicht mehr befreundet 79.249.185.192 14:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

paul Metz is not in contact with tina schüßler. thats a wrong pic 77.5.85.176 23:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of courtesy, as the image is hardly usable (strong personality rights in Germany) and isn't in use anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Schüßler ist nicht mehr mit paul Metz zusammen 93.133.19.141 13:54, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept - the personal situatation between the two is irrelevant. Image is correctly licensed, they were aware of the photographer and posing for him. --Denniss (talk) 05:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author field contaisn «Canal NBR, sem prévio conhecimento do nome do fotógrafo» ("Canal NBR, without previous knowledge of the name of the photographer"), so the author could not give his/her permission. Possible copyruight violation. The photo looks like a professional work which could hardly be licensed under CC. Stegop (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License updated, but still needs source FASTILY 01:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]