Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/01/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Studio_Publicity_Photo.jpg){kind=link}
.svg.tif){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_May_2012.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Vandalism. Description, Date, Source, Author, Permission and Other versions are "penis". Uploader's images are being used for vandalism. ErikvanB (talk) 07:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied for vandalism and copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Vandalism. Description, Date, Source, Author, Permission and Other versions are "penis". Image was used to vandalise article "Bart De Wever" on nl-wiki. ErikvanB (talk) 07:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Funfood as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright notice on page http://www.vegasdefined.com/lv/las-vegas-casinos Multichill (talk) 12:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- You are right, I didn't check well. It's a crop from File:LVWynnfromtheBLvd.jpg. We'll keep it then. --Funfood ␌ 14:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Crop from free pic Funfood ␌ 14:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Morocco. 84.61.146.235 13:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept, nomination by known Troll and classic architecture not copyrighted Denniss (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
[reopened -- speedy keep is not appropriate. He may be a troll, but he usually gets it right. The fact that he is a troll is not a reason to keep something that ought to be deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)]
Hey, dies ist ein Bild einer gar nicht so alten Moschee in Marokko, wo es keine Panoramafreiheit gibt. Von daher meine ich, dass dieses Bild auf Wikimedia Commons nichts zu suchen hat. Einwände? 84.61.135.58 12:50, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete I agree, the architect was Michel Pinseau who died in 1999, this building was completed in 1993, Morocco has no Freedom of panorama, and therefore Commons requires a clear license (from the architect's heirs or firm I assume). Possible defenses: under the threshold of originality? No. Faithful copy of a work already in the public domain? Unlikely. De minimis? No, too large. -84user (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per excellent analysis of 84user. -Pete F (talk) 00:45, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Comment This file was not deleted. --84.61.139.62 15:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
image used only in hoax page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: That being the case - well out of scope and so speedy Herby talk thyme 17:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
This image was uploaded on top of a completely different imageat w:File:Marana View.JPG, without providing a source or license. We do not know who created it, nor if that person agrees to GFDL/cc-by-sa-3.0-migrated Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Revert to the original upload on en.wp with the explanation that the overwriting file never had any license or source information and repeat the transfer. I will do this. --Martin H. (talk) 22:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Transfered the initial version to File:Marana View.jpg. Martin H. (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Simply a copy of the wikipedia page Simonft (talk) 21:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly out of COM:SCOPE. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Can someone find the reported flickr source for this image? Leoboudv (talk) 07:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Google reverse image search and TinEye have not found this image on the Net. The uploader has been asked on FR to provide information; it's a good quality photograph, so it would be nice if it could be kept. Cat added. Cortomaltais (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep I found the flickr source and ordered a new review. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: flickr source available McZusatz (talk) 09:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Vandalism. Description, Date, Source, Author, Permission and Other versions are "penis". Image was used to vandalise article "Bart De Wever" on nl-wiki. ErikvanB (talk) 07:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Underlying image has been published already in 2009[1]. We therefore need confirmation of ownership from uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete – This is the cover of a commercial music album. Senator2029 03:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: cover of a commercial music album Julo (talk) 20:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This appears to be a painting rather than simple decor. The precautionary principle applies. --Fæ (talk) 12:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:24, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sou dono desta foto, não consigo deletar! John Wooler (talk) 18:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:24, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
File has been taken from copyrighted source with no indication that the author has approved it. Furthermore, careful examination shows that the water mark has been edited out of the photo. Simonft (talk) 20:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 04:24, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
_-_Studio_Publicity_Photo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Studio_Publicity_Photo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no proof that this image is out of copyright. Uploader did not fully research the whole image. George Ho (talk) 06:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
_-_Studio_Publicity_Photo.jpg){kind=link}
- Good luck with removing almost every pre-1963 publicity photo, since in almost all cases there is no conclusive evidence whether it is out of copyright or not.
- That's why all those publicity photo's on Wikipedia have additional information below them: "Publicity photos have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary." etc... well done sir, well done.J187B (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence given the image did not contain a valid copyright notice (not a full shot from front and back to prove this) Denniss (talk) 02:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
_-_Studio_Publicity_Photo.jpg){kind=link}
This image appears out of scope for Commons or wikipedia. Leoboudv (talk) 06:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted cover of a magazine. Rapsar (talk) 22:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:13, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Computer Icon for Microsoft product - Threshold of originallity concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Nope. Not violates threshold of originality,please see the icon,just ++ ,arrow,and squares... --Sixerf (talk) 00:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
It was deleted.--Sixerf (talk) 11:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry Morning ☼ (talk) 10:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.svg.tif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg.tif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm not firmiliar with the TIF format, but surely this is unneccesary. If the 2-3 ratio is really important, the flag could be made so in SVG like it's original source file. Fry1989 eh? 00:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
.svg.tif){kind=link}
- Fair enough. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.svg.tif){kind=link}
The relief is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 01:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
The relief is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 01:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot of a television programme. Jespinos (talk) 01:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a photo found on the internet. No EXIF data. This user has had many similar files deleted previously for the same reason. JeremyA (talk) 01:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 02:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this photo was published without a copyright notice and it is likely that the photo was published with a copyright notice. The uploader (Barnstarbob on Wikipedia) is currently being investigated at CCI for uploading numerous copyright violations such as this one. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There is no evidence for serving as a public domain photo. TBrandley 02:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this photo was published without a copyright notice and it is likely that the photo was published with a copyright notice. The uploader ( a sock of Barnstarbob on Wikipedia) is currently being investigated at CCI for uploading numerous copyright violations such as this one Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There is no evidence for serving as a public domain photo. TBrandley 03:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 02:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot of a television programme. Jespinos (talk) 02:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 03:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - only link is to AFC declined for lack of notability INeverCry 03:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 04:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - also possible copyvio images used INeverCry 04:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo INeverCry 04:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 04:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image that is only used on an English Wikipedia article, which has been tagged or already deleted now. TBrandley 04:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No clear educational value. -Pete F (talk) 19:52, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 04:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No clear educational value. -Pete F (talk) 19:53, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No clear educational value. -Pete F (talk) 19:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo uploaded by user with company username INeverCry 04:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No clear educational value. -Pete F (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 04:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No categories or useful description; unclear how this could be used within Commons scope. -Pete F (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 04:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -Pete F (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete no clear educational value -Pete F (talk) 19:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 05:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 05:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 05:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 05:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
According to the source (http://www.saidnur.com), copyright 2002 SaidNur.com. There is no proof of {{PD}}. Takabeg (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
No info copyrights André (talk) 05:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- File:A (86).JPG
- File:Peykerê Lissy Schmidt li Duhokê 2012.JPG
- File:Monument to Victims of Saddam-Era Chemical Attack - Halabja - Kurdistan - Iraq.jpg
- File:Sulaymaniyah public library.jpg
- File:Ahmadi.JPG
- File:Ahmedi khani duhok 2012.JPG
- File:Halbaja-monument.jpg
- File:C (65).JPG
- File:Halabja omar.JPG
- File:Zakia Alkan 1.jpg
- File:Zakia Alkan 2.jpg
- File:A (206).JPG
- File:A (207).JPG
- File:A (168).JPG
- File:A (169).JPG
- File:A (205).JPG
- File:Salih Alyousify (1).jpg
- File:Salih Alyousify (2).jpg
- File:Salih Alyousify (3).jpg
- File:Salih Alyousify (4).jpg
- File:Salih Alyousify (5).jpg
- File:The Union.jpg
- File:The Cry.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Iraq Takabeg (talk) 06:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probable copyvio. I think the original uploader took this image from abana.ir. Takabeg (talk) 08:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commercial product aspect that does not clearly sit within the educational scope of Commons. Would need a permission to host it at a bare minimum. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
por que esta mal hecha y contiene errores Eduardo Quevedo (talk) 09:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
por que tiene defectos e esta incorrecta 189.158.215.134 09:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic, photoshopped version of well-known Osama Bin Laden-image[2]. Clearly out of COM:SCOPE and surely not own work of uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
The clarity of the logo etc suggests that this is actually a copyright violation to me however given the time we have hosted the image a DR seemed appropriate. Herby talk thyme 09:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
The clarity of the logo etc suggests that this is actually a copyright violation to me however given the time we have hosted the image a DR seemed appropriate. Herby talk thyme 09:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Scanned from a textbook, badJPG, not used anywhere. Leyo 10:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
{{Convert to wikitable}} applies, not used anywhere. Leyo 10:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
This is an animated. A copyright notice appears on the third picture. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 13:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- To delete. --JMCC1 (talk) 16:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Without additional details, the source and author information as given is highly implausible (José Gustavo Guerrero died in 1958). Thus, permission and licensing are questionable. Uwe (talk) 13:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Probably coyvio from here Mel22 (talk) 13:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It says "Copyright © 2012 IUPHAR" on the source page. McZusatz (talk) 13:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysterious shadow, most likely cropped from unknown source. Gunnex (talk) 13:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Copied from de.wikipedia without naming the author of the picture, a properly attributed version of the file is already present: File:Sterzing-Vipiteno and Elzenbaumer Wetterkreuz.JPG Mai-Sachme (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, copied from de.wikipedia without mentioning the author of the picture. Mai-Sachme (talk) 13:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
This image is probably a derivative of the screen projection. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete speedy I would have said. --Herby talk thyme 15:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Originally posted at http://wikitravel.org/shared/File:Drive_In.JPG where it has no source. The file was deleted at http://wts.wikivoyage-old.org/wiki/File:Drive_In.JPG for that exact reason. Stefan4 (talk) 14:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Originally uploaded to http://wts.wikivoyage-old.org/wiki/File:Fred_and_Ginger_Building_in_Prague.jpg where it says that it was uploaded by "(WT-shared) Puzzlement" and taken by "(WT-shared) Hypatia". There is no evidence that the former has received permission from the latter. Stefan4 (talk) 14:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The problem is that user requested a name change. It is the same user. See http://wts.wikivoyage-old.org/w/index.php?title=User:%28WT-shared%29_Puzzlement&action=history as an example. --MGA73 (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry. I didn't notice that. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hehe that's ok. It took me loooong time to figure that out but don't tell anyone else ;-) --MGA73 (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry. I didn't notice that. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
absent permissions Rudko (talk) 15:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete per nom. (not necessary to make double tags, file had "no permission-tag" --AtelierMonpli (talk) 08:26, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status as the file already circulated massively in the internet (example from 2007) before upload date. Gunnex (talk) 15:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
low quality Rudko (talk) 15:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Keepcan be used in article [[3]] --AtelierMonpli (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Old revision of File:San francisco districts.png. Doesn't look very useful. Stefan4 (talk) 15:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
uploaded by user for private and advertisement usage Rudko (talk) 15:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep can be used in article [[4]] --AtelierMonpli (talk) 11:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Screenshot and no usage at WM Projects. Unknown user. Rudko (talk) 15:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
low resolution / no category Rudko (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
About a half of images posted by User:Myararat83 are derivative works of images that was taken by other users at panoramio, flickr, wowturkey etc.. Because we can find some images in the user's page of my ararat at panoramio (for example: File:Little AraratDSC 3125.jpg © All Rights Reserved 2011/02/15), I think User:Myararat83 is my ararat at panoramio. Even if, following images are not of my ararat at panoramio, but of other users.
- File:Diyarbakır (14).jpg wowturkey.com 2011/02/26 by Romedi666.
- File:Diyarbakır (7).jpg © All Rights Reserved 2009/06/02 by Kazım TUĞRUL.
- File:Sulamani-kurdistan (2).jpg © All Rights Reserved 2011/05/25 by Hewraman
- File:Sulamani-kurdistan (4).jpg © All Rights Reserved 2011/05/01 by mazhar30
- File:Sulamani-kurdistan (5).jpg © All Rights Reserved 2011/05/31 by Hewraman
- File:Sulamani-kurdistan (6).jpg Image in www.mezopotamyamc5.com
- File:Sulamani-kurdistan (13).jpg All Rights Reserved 2011/05/01 by mazhar30
- File:Sulamani-kurdistannwe.jpg All Rights Reserved 2011/05/01 by mazhar30
- File:Hewler-kurdistan (8).jpg © All Rights Reserved 2011/07/22 by Hewreman.
- File:Reya sulamani-hewler.jpg © All Rights Reserved 2011/05/25 by Hewreman.
- File:Doğubayazıt DSC 9144.jpg © All Rights Reserved 2011/01/16 by Mustafa Kilicaslan.
- File:Baharın gelişiDSC 5252.jpg © All Rights Reserved 2011/01/23 by Mustafa Kilicaslan.
- File:Mezel Uzimali.jpg © All Rights Reserved 2012/01/18 by Mustafa Kilicaslan.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Takabeg (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
low resolution Rudko (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
low resolution / unknown person Rudko (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
not valid licence Rudko (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
not valid licence Rudko (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
not valid licence Rudko (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope promo Rudko (talk) 16:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
personal images Rudko (talk) 16:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
low resolution Rudko (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
low resolution, out of scope, private Rudko (talk) 16:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, low resolution, no usage Rudko (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
promotion, low resolution Rudko (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scopde, del. on DE Nolispanmo 16:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, non usage Rudko (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
low resolution, non usage, Rudko (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
No permission recopy of price Rudko (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, foto of award without permision Rudko (talk) 16:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded in good faith, but this is a photograph of a copyrighted 2D image and so protected under US and UK law Hchc2009 (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
low resolution Rudko (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, foto of award wo permission Rudko (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
low resolution, non usage Rudko (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
award wo permission of licence Rudko (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
low resolution, non usage, out of scope Rudko (talk) 16:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, non usage, promotion Rudko (talk) 16:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, resolution Rudko (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, private diploma Rudko (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, private images wo usage Rudko (talk) 16:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, private images with non usage Rudko (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:56, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, private images with non usage Rudko (talk) 16:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded in good faith, but this is a photograph of a copyrighed 2D picture, protected under US and UK law Hchc2009 (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. I think these files should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. I think these files should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Uploader requested, this was uploaded as an alt for a protected file, that file has now been updated. Fry1989 eh? 19:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of an organization. Rapsar (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete copyrighted logo. The official site clearly says: "© 2011 Antalya Kültürlerarası Diyalog Merkezi" -- Meisam (talk) 14:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of Originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of originality concern in third party logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The coat of arms of Slovakia is hundreds of years old in it's design, the rest is simple text, a circle, and a pentagram. Fry1989 eh? 01:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.skslovan.com/index.php?context=202 INeverCry 17:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Slovak Coat of arms surrounded by basic text and pentagon, too simple. Keep Fry1989 eh? 15:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of orginality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Third party logo - Not CC as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
This image is a derivative of a copyrighted work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot of a television programme. Jespinos (talk) 21:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own-work; appears to be a scan of a (probably) copyrighted slip of en:hell money. —Darkwind (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Logo - Threshold of originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP (all uploads of user copyvios/problematics) Gunnex (talk) 21:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Info: see also related montages File:Umuarama.jpg + File:Vista de Umuarama.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 21:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
This is a logo, and thus I have Threshold of orignality concerns as to the applicability of the CC License given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It consists simple geometric shapes and text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Same issue can be seen in this DR.--Rapsar (talk) 22:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The designers' name is unknown and former copyright holder was Beşiktaş Gymnastics Club (legal person, it still holds the trademark right of this logo). The team colors have not changed since the end of the Balkan Wars. The basic design hasn't changed since the end of the World War I. After 1929, Arabic characters had been converted to Latin characters. But characters are not protected by copyright law. Star and crescent had been added by Adnan Menderes in 1952. But star and crescent are not protected by copyright law. So I think {{PD-TR}} can be applied to this emblem. Takabeg (talk) 23:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Only used on Wikivoyage Tech, which was never imported to Wikimedia since it was thought that the project wasn't needed. I don't think that Commons needs this image. Stefan4 (talk) 21:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep this is too simple for the US. Fry1989 eh? 01:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Same reason stated above. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Windows Logo - Threshold of originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Only used at Wikivoyage General which was never imported to Wikimedia because it was thought that it wasn't needed. I don't think that Commons needs this image. Stefan4 (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Logo, Concern is about the applicability of a CC-self license Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was incorrectly uploaded from the Hebrew Wikipedia, and came out as a low-resolution scan. I uploaded it correctly to this new file: File:Netivei Am Street, Jerusalem.jpg. Yoninah (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Yoninah (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of originality concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Logo/crest- Threshold of originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I see the logo is complex enough to be copyrighted. Fma12 (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It is not clear where this image came from or whether it is indeed public domain. It was copied from Hebrew Wikipedia. Yoninah (talk) 21:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It is not clear what the licensing is or whether this image is public domain. It was copied from the Hebrew Wikipedia. Yoninah (talk) 21:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
As the depicted (provided the description is valid) died in 1992[5], this is not a life-shot, but evidently a reproduction of an existing photo and thereby a derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot from a music video. Jespinos (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the image. Jespinos (talk) 22:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a sports team. Rapsar (talk) 22:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete By default, copyrighted logo. No permission of it published under a free license. The official site says "Copyright © 2012 Baltimore Ravens. All Rights Reserved" -- Meisam (talk) 14:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Personal work, out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Personal work, out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Uploader is not the original creator of this file. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Uploader is not the original creator of this file. Rapsar (talk) 22:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete derivative image of copyrighted image. The actress is still alive. The source says "Copyright © 2009" it doesn't mean that copyright is expired in 2009 (as understood by uploader) -- Meisam (talk) 14:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image that is not used on any articles or gallerys at any related project. TBrandley 23:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot from a video. Jespinos (talk) 23:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- It's claimed to be the user's own work. We can ask him to upload the original image with EXIF to confirm it. -- Meisam (talk) 13:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Personal work -- out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
I have no idea what this is or whether it is in scope. Given the uploader's other contributions, I suspect it is intended to be personal art. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Most of all images that were posted by User:Gewirk had been taken by several photographers (such as Alizade, O. Farrokh, Omid, Mohsen Rashidi Gewerk) etc. So there is no proof of {{Self}}.
- File:Zab river in kurdistan- sardasht.jpg
- File:Sardasht city in west azarbaijan-kurdistan.jpg
- File:Sardasht- basawe plain.jpg
- File:Sardasht(kurdistan)- nature in spring.jpg
- File:Sardasht - gawerk palin.jpg
- File:Sardasht -urmia - kurdistan.jpg
- File:Sardasht - kurdistam- west azarbaijan.jpg
- File:Sardasht - kurdistam- west azarbaijan 2.jpg
- File:Rabat city - kurdistan - view.jpg
- File:Gawerk.man - sardasht - kurdistan- west azarbaijan.jpg
- File:Gawerk- sardasht - karimagha.jpg
- File:خدرآغا مامندی.jpg
- File:Gawerk - urmia - mirad heso-001.jpg
- File:Rabat city in kurdistan -mohsen rashidi gawerk 09147228314.jpg
- File:Rabat city in Kurdistan -west azarbaijan - mohsen rashidi gawerk.jpg
- File:Rabat- kurdistan - west azarbaijan - photo by mohsen rashidi 09147228314.jpg
- File:Rabat- kurdistan - west azarbaijan -2012 - photo by mohsen rashidi 09147228314.jpg
- File:Sardast - Zab river - kurdistan.jpg
- File:Kurdistan -west azarbaijan -Rabat- sardasht - Gravan spring.jpg
- File:Sardasht - west azarbaijan-kurdistan.jpg
- File:Sardasht - Kurdistan- west azarbaijan.jpg
- File:Sardsht- west azarbaijan - kurdistan (1).jpg
- File:Sardsht- west azarbaijan - kurdistan (2).jpg
- File:Sardsht- west azarbaijan - kurdistan (3).jpg
- File:Sardsht- west azarbaijan - kurdistan (4).jpg
- File:Sardasht- Kurdish Dance- iranian kurdistan- west azarbaijan.jpg
- File:Sardasht - shelmash waterfall- kurdistan.jpg
-_nature_in_spring.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Possibly the uploader User:Gewirk may be Mohsen Rashidi Gewerk. If so, File:Rabat city in kurdistan -mohsen rashidi gawerk 09147228314.jpg, File:Rabat city in Kurdistan -west azarbaijan - mohsen rashidi gawerk.jpg, File:Rabat- kurdistan - west azarbaijan - photo by mohsen rashidi 09147228314.jpg, File:Rabat- kurdistan - west azarbaijan -2012 - photo by mohsen rashidi 09147228314.jpg can be kept. Takabeg (talk) 00:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: more than doubtful own work PierreSelim (talk) 07:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Very low quality image. SilkTork (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
low quality, I agree Makovec (talk) 10:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Double - doppelt mit: File:Rathaus Bremen 116thd.jpg - Dieses Bild wurde inzwischen überarbeitet. Pedelecs (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not exact duplicate PierreSelim (talk) 07:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Dieses Bild ist nicht vom Urheber Pedelecs hochgeladen. Das Original ist in Wekimedia unter "File:Rathaus Bremen 116thd.jpg" zu finden Pedelecs (talk) 08:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
private non usage graphics Rudko (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Comment It's a statistical graph from enwp. Maybe useful. --Funfood ␌ 21:27, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: In scope, it's a WP statistic plot PierreSelim (talk) 07:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
yingxko@qq.com 183.44.146.83 17:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: we generally don't delete welcome messages PierreSelim (talk) 07:02, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
this template is useless since the creator exists Hsarrazin (talk) 18:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: the template is in use here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gaston_d'Audiffret-Pasquier.jpg not to describe the author of the media, it seems ok not to use the {{Creator}} PierreSelim (talk) 07:03, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality picture with little contextual information Simonft (talk) 20:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Why?? Xic 667 20:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Quality is generally not a reason for deletion, a description is provided (catalan) which is fine for an international project like Commons PierreSelim (talk) 06:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality picture with little contextual information Simonft (talk) 20:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Why ?? Xic 667 20:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Quality is generally not a reason for deletion, a description is provided (catalan) which is fine for an international project like Commons PierreSelim (talk) 06:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
the article coresponding to this file is no loger available Rondosztuki (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Érico Wouters msg 02:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Soy quien subió este archivo, lo he sustituido por otra versión mejorada. Rod6807 (talk) 01:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable copyvio of the source images. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate file of this http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marthanda_Vurmah_Maha_Rajah.png higher resolution image and no proper sourcing Linguisticgeek (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Booth images are scans of copies of the same original image. This one isn't clearly worse than the other one, and details shown are different - maybe because of using a different source or maybe because of different scanner settings. We should keep both images in the same way we usually keep different images of the same work of art.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
BadSVG, not in use at time of deletion request, replaced by file:Francis Cardinal George Archbishop of Chicago Coat of Arms.svg Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Neither image is too great in its current form, but File:Francis Cardinal George Archbishop of Chicago Coat of Arms.svg could be improved with some simple color adjustments... AnonMoos (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Is this in scope? What do the colors indicate? McZusatz (talk) 13:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey, dies ist ein Bild eines modernen Gebäudes in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten, wo es keine Panoramafreiheit gibt. Von daher meine ich, dass dieses Bild auf Wikimedia Commons nichts zu suchen hat. Einwände? 84.61.146.235 13:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree, this building was completed in 2010, and therefore Commons requires a clear license from the copyright holder, the architect Foster and Partners in this case. A de minimis defence is not possible here as the building appears as the main subject and not in a panorama, see Commons:De minimis for details and examples. -84user (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of poster in background, fails COM:DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Poster is small enough and not the main object. This is one of the posters of Popular Front of Estonia (Rahvarinne) and that organization ceased to exist 20 years ago. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
licence not valid Rudko (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep Why not? I think I ofund the original image here [[6]] and on the sitemap of the website the author writes: "I am almost always happy to grant permission for use of my material. Almost everything on this site is my own. Just linking to my site is the equivalent of citing something in a bibliography, and in my view does not require permission." I will link to this page in the file-description and everiything should be ok. --Funfood ␌ 20:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Funfood quotes the site out of context, "I'm almost always happy to grant permission to use material for educational purposes. [emphasis added]" That is not a license, but simply an expression of willingness to grant a license that will not be sufficient for Commons or WP:EN. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
not valid licence Rudko (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abundance in Planet.jpg. --Funfood ␌ 20:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Threshold of origianlity concern in Heraldry, Original crest is presumably owned by KCL Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose The crests by Oxford, Cambridge and Durham universities (File:Durham shield.png, File:Oxford University Coat Of Arms.svg, File:Cambridge University Crest.svg) which are used in their templates are on Commons as well. In order for it to be used in the college template (just like Oxbridge, Durham and a dozen other colleges) I see no reason for it to be deleted. Or, perhaps, you can enlighten me with some consistent rule which I've overlooked. --Merlaysamuel : Chat 16:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: In general, the copyright in heraldry lies with the creator of the specific instance, which, in this case, is our uploader. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Dubious own work: uploaded to w:File:KCL Coat of arms1.png three years earlier by a different user, sourced to www.kcl.ac.uk and suggesting that the uploader isn't the artist. Stefan4 (talk) 14:17, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I opened article about en:King's College London and read: "The coat of arms displayed on the College Charter is that of George IV." That means probably, that the logo (crest) is PD-old. Taivo (talk) 15:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The College is certainly old enough for this to fall out of copyright. Fry1989 eh? 03:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- This is obviously a modern drawing of the coat of arms, although it might be based on the same blazon as the one used at George IV's time. The copyright expires 70 years after the death of the person who made this particular drawing of it. See also User:Jameslwoodward's closure above. The problem with that one was that the artist of this particular representation of the coat of arms was misidentified. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Kept: --Alan (talk) 14:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 淺藍雪 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Coat of arms of King's College London, how on earth is this the author's own work Yann (talk) 10:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- see English Wikipedia "The current coat of arms was developed following the mergers with Queen Elizabeth College and Chelsea College in 1985 and incorporates aspects of their heraldry.", might be copyrighted.--淺藍雪❉ 11:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Keep, assuming this is own work of the user. We have many crests created by users, eg. File:Reading shield.png Aloneinthewild (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The style really looks college of arms => I don't believe in own work. Kathisma (talk) 02:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Heraldic crest, Threshold of Originality concern... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The college is 106 years old. This is too old for copyright to still apply. Fry1989 eh? 01:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
[Note: Fixing incomplete DR: (In short: The two persons depicted on the photo requested deletion) MGA73 (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC):]
This deletion request is made on behalf of the two persons depicted on it, who have only recenty become aware that this unauthorized picture is in circulation through different wikipedia articles. At the time when somebody, a stranger to them, asked if he could take a picture as a souvenir, they were not aware that this picture would circulate. Their permission was never asked. Their right to control their image has been transgressed. They do not appreciate this and ask for deletion of the picture. Andries Van den abeele (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- P. S. A request was allready filed on November 12th by the user who brought in the picture, but up till now with no favourable result. Andries Van den abeele (talk) 11:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No public figures and no documentary background, so the peoples consent is needed according to european and belgian law. Funfood ␌ 20:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ReconImuler (talk · contribs)
[edit]58 duplicates of a meaningless file, no description
- File:IPhone21-60.part34.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part33.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part31.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part32.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part29.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part30.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part28.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part25.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part26.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part27.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part23.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part22.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part24.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part19.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part20.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part21.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part18.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part17.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part16.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part14.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part13.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part15.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part11.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part12.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part10.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part09.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part07.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part08.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part06.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part05.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part04.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part02.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part03.jpg
- File:IPhone21-60.part01.jpg
- File:K-ksdasd==.jpg
- File:SMU Vista7-x64.7z.jpg
- File:SMBus.7z.jpg
- File:IDE Vista7-x64.7z.jpg
- File:IDE XP-x86.7z.jpg
- File:SATARAID XP-x86.7z.jpg
- File:SATARAID W7-x64.7z.jpg
- File:VGA XP-x86.7z.003.jpg
- File:VGA XP-x86.7z.001.jpg
- File:VGA XP-x86.7z.002.jpg
- File:VGA VistaW7-x64.7z.004.jpg
- File:VGA VistaW7-x64.7z.001.jpg
- File:VGA VistaW7-x64.7z.003.jpg
- File:VGA VistaW7-x64.7z.002.jpg
- File:Ethernet XP-x86.7z.jpg
- File:Audio Vista78-x64.7z.001.jpg
- File:USB XP-x86.7z.jpg
- File:Ethernet Vista7-x64.7z.jpg
- File:Audio XP-x86.7z.jpg
- File:Audio Vista78-x64.7z.002.jpg
- File:IosActivator.jpg
- File:Furiousmod-2.1.0.jpg
- File:Ifile 1.7.1-1.jpg
- File:AirBlue2.jpg
Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 23:24, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:45, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ReconImuler (talk · contribs)
[edit]The same meaningless image duplicated across all uploads, and accompanied by silly sayings. Not useful in any way.
- File:IPhone21-601.part23.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part22.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part21.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part20.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part19.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part18.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part17.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part16.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part15.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part14.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part13.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part12.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part11.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part10.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part09.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part08.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part07.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part06.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part05.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part04.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part03.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part02.jpg
- File:IPhone21-601.part01.jpg
- File:IPod 24.1.1.2.part3.jpg
- File:IPod 24.1.1.2.part2.jpg
- File:IPod 24.1.1.2.part1.jpg
- File:Nexus s.jpg
Senator2029 00:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Those photos are like duplicate, and I suggest those photos may fall out of scope. --cyrfaw (talk) 09:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
gallery:Ardenza train station
[edit]empty gallery --Etienne (Li) (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Please don't use {{Delete}} for houskeeping; {{Speedy}} uses many fewer resources. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 02:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Low resolutions, no metadatas. Unlikely to be own works.
Jespinos (talk) 01:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
- File:Iri y yasmani.JPG
- File:Irina.JPG
- File:Nino.jpg
- File:La vida es una obra que no permite jugar.JPG
- File:La vida es una obra que no permite ensayos.JPG
- File:Jose carlos lopez infante.JPG
- File:Cubano mi numwero de telefono es 024802199.JPG
Jespinos (talk) 02:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Post-1923 works by Auguste Brouet
[edit]Circa 1925 (Undelete in 2022)
[edit]
Unknown (Undelete in 2037)
[edit]- File:CHANTEUSE_DE_CAFÉ_CONCERT_par_Brouet.JPG
- File:Danseuse saluant by Brouet.jpg
- File:La ballerine par Brouet.jpg
- File:La femme au chien par Brouet.jpg
- File:Les Saltimbanques par Brouet.JPG
- File:Selfportrait Auguste Brouet.jpg
- File:Soldiers Camp by Brouet.jpg
Auguste Brouet is a French artist publishing in France who died in 1941. Because French wartime extensions extended the 50 pma copyright of all works in copyright in 1948 by 8 years, the works were in copyright on the URAA date in 1996, so any works published 1923 or later will remain in copyright in the United States until at least 2019. The dates of most of the works are unknown, but unfortunately Brouet published work both before and after 1923, and without more information they must be deleted. The source websites offer no information about year of publication. --Dcoetzee (talk) 02:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SaschaDeutschland (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images/posters
- File:Flyer-ric-2011.jpg
- File:Flyer-ric-2010.jpg
- File:Flyer-ric-2009.jpg
- File:Flyer-ric-2008.jpg
- File:Flyer-ric-2005.jpg
- File:Flyer-ric-2007.jpg
- File:Flyer-ric-2006.jpg
- File:Flyer-ric-2003.jpg
- File:Flyer-ric-2004.jpg
- File:Flyer-ric-2002.jpg
- File:Riclogo.jpg
- File:Rock in Caputh 2012 - 18.-19. Mai 2012.jpg
INeverCry 03:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete All photos look like promotional, no need to keep these photos here on Commons. --cyrfaw (talk) 09:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - images of non-notable persons
- File:Pavel Vrbka - šéfkuchař Stará myslivna Konopiště.jpg
- File:Filip Bárta - šéfkuchař Stará myslivna Konopiště.jpg
INeverCry 03:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Works by Octave Denis Victor Guillonnet
[edit]Before 1943 (Undelete in 2038)
[edit]- File:Blanc et Noir 1.JPG (1886)
- File:La mule du Pape d'Alphonse Daudet.JPG (1887 or 1892)
- File:Le Figaro Illustré Noel 1898 Le Printemps2.JPG (1898)
- File:Mimi1.JPG (1898)
- File:La partie de rugby - coté gauche.jpg (1899)
- File:Menu de Betheny.JPG (1901)
- File:Menu du diner du 5 X 1905 à Madrid.JPG (1905)
- File:Garden party 007.jpg (1908)
- File:Narkiss de Jean Lorrain.JPG (1908)
- File:Funk Brentano-Jeanne d'Arc.jpg (1912)
- File:Carton Banquet Cormon.JPG (1913)
- File:Menu de la chambre des notaires de Paris du 2 IV 1913.JPG (1913)
- File:42e congrès de gymnastique-Le petit journal.jpg (1920, centrally features a reproduction of a painting of Guillonnet dating to or before that time)
- File:Guillonnet Réalisant le plafond du 15e.JPG (photo of Guillonet, background occupied by a large painting of Guillonet's in progress that was completed and published in 1929)
- File:Trone de l’empereur d’Annam.JPG (throne for which Guillonet did the tapestry designs for the fabric) (1931)
- File:Fresque Le Broc.jpg (1939)
- File:Le Broc - Chemin de Croix - Jésus condamné à mort.JPG (1939)
1944 (Undelete in 2040)
[edit]- File:Glorification de la pensée ident.JPG (derivative of a tapestry first exhibited in 1944; warning: uploader may not be actual author of this diagram, in which case undelete is even later)
1952 (Undelete in 2048)
[edit]- File:Collégiale de Jargeau - Fresque de J. d'Arc.jpg
- File:Jargeau - chemin de Croix - VIe station.jpg
Octave Denis Victor Guillonet (see Category:Octave Denis Victor Guillonnet) was a French painter who died in 1967. His works will remain copyrighted in France until 2038, and his post-1943 works will remain copyrighted in the US until 95 years after publication under the URAA (undelete categories labelled above) (works published before 1943 expire in the US before they do in France). Most date information was obtained from fr:Octave Denis Victor Guillonnet, which is also using most of these works. --Dcoetzee (talk) 03:58, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value - glare, very low quality, taken through windows, etc
- File:Vancouver Student View8.jpg
- File:Vancouver Student View7.jpg
- File:Vancouver Student View6.jpg
- File:Vancouver Student View4.jpg
- File:Vancouver Student View5.jpg
- File:Vancouver Student View1.jpg
- File:Vancouver Student View3.jpg
- File:Vancouver Student View2.jpg
INeverCry 04:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete Per nom. --Funfood ␌ 18:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michael Doc Martin (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 04:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
unsure about copyright status and scope of these?
- File:Chef master logo.jpg
- File:Sang dewa logo.jpg
- File:Party2night logo.jpg
- File:Logo pot poker.jpg
- File:Ocean holic logo.jpg
- File:Harta & tahta.jpg
- File:Jawara sejati logo.jpg
- File:Desa gembala logo.jpg
- File:Mojogamon logo.jpg
INeverCry 04:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jay DeAgo Super Model (talk · contribs)
[edit]possible copyvios - own work claim doubtful
- File:Jay DeAgo in the M Book.jpg
- File:Jay Deago SeeThe Next Level.jpg
- File:Paris de Jay DeAgo.jpg
- File:Jay DeAgo British billboard.jpg
- File:Jay DeAgo billboard.jpg
- File:Jay DeAgo hair.jpg
- File:Jay DeAgo face.jpg
- File:Jay DeAgo deemed an International Male Super Model.jpg
- File:Jay deago.jpg
- File:Jay DeAgo.jpg
INeverCry 04:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Larryadixon (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images - also possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 05:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal images - vacation pics
INeverCry 05:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Post-1923 works by Édouard Vuillard
[edit]1923 (Undelete in 2019)
[edit]
1927 (Undelete in 2023)
[edit]- File:Édouard Vuillard - Madame André Wormser and her Children (Detail of Wallpaintings).jpg (1926/1927)
- File:Édouard Vuillard - Madame André Wormser and her Children.jpg (1926/1927)
.jpg){kind=link}
1928 (Undelete in 2024)
[edit]
1932 (Undelete in 2028)
[edit]- File:Edouard Vuillard - The countess Marie-Blanche de Polignac - Google Art Project.jpg (1928-1932) (this one was my own error - I didn't know about wartime extensions at the time)
1933 (Undelete in 2029)
[edit]_by_Edouard_Vuillard.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1935 (Undelete in 2031)
[edit]- File:Vuillard9.JPG (1932-1935)
1936 (Undelete in 2032)
[edit]- File:Madame Hessel in the Boudoir, Rue de Naples by Édouard Vuillard, San Diego Museum of Art.JPG (c. 1935)
Unknown (Undelete in 2036)
[edit]- File:Lille PdBA Vuillard Loucheur.JPG ("early 20th century")
- File:Édouard Vuillard - Femme en rouge, dos a la fenetre.jpg
- File:Édouard Vuillard - Les Couturières.jpg (undeleted, User:Botaurus found an 1890 date for this one)
Édouard Vuillard (Category:Édouard Vuillard) is a French painter who died in 1940. On the URAA date in 1996, France had 50 pma, plus an additional 8 years of wartime extensions for works before 1948, so his works were still in copyright then. This means that any 1923 or later works by Vuillard like the above remain in copyright in the US until at least 2019. Fortunately most of his works predate 1923 and are not affected. I was able to find dates for most of them, but a few are unknown, and lacking information we must assume the worst (that they date to his death year). As usual I added one year for "circa" dates to be safe. --Dcoetzee (talk) 05:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep You can't maintain this haughty attitude, we can't publish it in the US, so we won't publish it in the rest of the world. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- As I noted many times before, the WMF explicitly forbids hosting works that are copyrighted in the US on any WMF project except under an EDP compliant with US fair use law, as does Commons:Licensing. Please don't characterise me as "haughty" when I am only enforcing policy - reserve your ire for the lawmakers who create these inane restrictions. Dcoetzee (talk) 00:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Then the WMF must change its attitude. It isn't possible to impose the bad US copryright laws on the rest of the world. --91.18.44.21 11:00, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- As I noted many times before, the WMF explicitly forbids hosting works that are copyrighted in the US on any WMF project except under an EDP compliant with US fair use law, as does Commons:Licensing. Please don't characterise me as "haughty" when I am only enforcing policy - reserve your ire for the lawmakers who create these inane restrictions. Dcoetzee (talk) 00:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The wartime extensions have been included into the French law until February 2007 only for works published during the wars. Non of the works above was published during Worldwar I or II so there is no extension in these cases and therefor these images have not been copyrighted in 1996 in France. Thus URAA does not apply her. For non-musical works the court of cassation made the laws invalid later in 2007, however that isn't of relevance in this context anyways. --91.18.44.21 11:49, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- This is not how the wartime extensions work. The WWII extensions apply to any work published before January 1, 1948 that was not in the public domain on August 13, 1941; none of Vuillard's works were out of copyright less than two years after his death. See en:Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#endnote_tab_france for explanation and citations. These can only be retained with a suitable license statement from Vuillard's heirs. I will however re-upload them to Wikilivres after deletion. Dcoetzee (talk) 20:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Americanescort (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising and/or self-promotional images. Recommend deletion in accordance with Commons:Deletion policy.
- File:American Escort party lomo bus.jpg
- File:American Escort promo girls under banner.JPG
- File:ESCORT8.JPG
- File:Story of an American Escort.jpg
- File:Story of an American Escort - a novel ISBN 978-0-595-50451-0.jpg
- File:Car with Logo- American Escort Driver Services.jpg
Senator2029 05:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Modern building in Luxembourg. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per DR discussion. MBisanz talk 17:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
_-_May_2012.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_May_2012.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Modern building in Luxembourg. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Is there not an exception for buildings of major importance, as the European Court of Justice is one of the most important institutions of the European Union?--Bdx (talk) 13:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- In a word, "No". Copyright is copyright. Another user has exchanged e-mails with the architects and they have given permission for WP, but not a more general license. This was, I think, because our colleague did not request the more general license, so he is trying again. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK, thank you. If it needs to be deleted, then so be it. So just to be clear: if I want to upload a picture of a modern building in the future, can I do it by using another license or do I always need to ask the architect for permission? --Bdx (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- It depends entirely on what country the building is in, see COM:FOP. For example, Germany, the UK, the USA are OK, France is not. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
wrong licence.Nomination from User:Andrejj -- DieBuche (talk) 23:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
What is wrong with the licences for all these pictures for http://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volovja_reber article? All photos are either my work except one (given for public use), all intended to be put into public domain. These pictures are also included on my site www.volovjareber.si (which I own, and to which other authors gave me rights to use pictures in public domain - conservation use). Maybe there is just some technical detail? All pictures have "Source=Own work". Which tag I need to add? -- Alesjagodnik 12:20, 26 September 2010
- Comment This could have been copied from http://www.volovjareber.si/zveri/pic/ris3.jpg and needs evidence of permission by COM:OTRS. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:14, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Well, copyright on www.volovjareber.si says:
- Besedila in fotografije na spletnih straneh so lastnina zgoraj navedenih avtorjev in se lahko uporabljajo izključno za predstavitev na spletnih straneh www.volovjareber.si. Uporaba za druge namene je mogoča le s soglasjem avtorja.
- And tehnical: whos own work? Oršanič or Jagodnik? --Andrejj (talk) 12:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- As this is credited to Oršanič, it needs evidence of permission by Oršanič. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Mr. Oršanič and others gave photos to me for conservation purposes (web pages, mails etc.) - we used them for site www.volovjareber.si (which I mainly created and wrote the same copyright text you mention - which means other people can't take photos from that site and use it as they want for their own purposes). With some of these same photos we also created wiki entry (with their consent). Photos were given as such to be used for conservation purposes and people who created these photos (me - Ales Jagodnik, Tomaž Jančar, Hrvoje Oršanič and others) don't mind at all usage of these photos for such purposes. Every picture also has author mentioned and besides also my wiki username, because other authors don't all have wikipedia account. Feel free to contact all of them (me: ales.jagodnik@gmail.com, info@volovjareber.si, tomaz.jancar@dopps-drustvo.si, hrvoje.orsanic@zgs.gov.si).
- I really don't understand what "Wrong licence" means? Please correct licence and other data so that it matches photo's and article's author intent as I mentioned above. Maybe I could just change Source to www.volovjareber.si ? Alesjagodnik 17:33, 26 September 2010
- It does not work that way. If you want to keep these images, it is your job to ask the photographers to send a free permission to COM:OTRS. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- What about changing source of pictures to "www.volovjareber.si", keeping authors names and change to corresponding licence (which one don't know then)? Alesjagodnik 17:55, 26 September 2010
- There seems to be a problem with permissions -> Delete. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- There seems to be a problem with permissions ->
{{PermissionOTRS|2010092610005563}}
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
An OTRS ticket ended the previous deletion discussion, but as Eleassar pointed out at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Volovjareber-zveri.jpg, the permission in the ticket is insufficient for Commons, being essentially a "for Wikipedia" permission. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 12:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- At current state I support deletion, but one could reopen the OTRS ticket and as the copyright holder for clearification. --Krd 13:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not sure what is permissible here anymore. For example, these two files ([7], [8]) have been recognised as ok. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think the problem with the two discussions you cite is that the images were made especially for Wikipedia (ie made so that they would be useful to Wikipedia), but there's nothing to suggest they were made exclusively for Wikipedia (ie not intended to be used by third parties). In this case, permission was given "for Wikipedia" in the OTRS ticket, but the client didn't specify a license or say anything about reuse by third parties. I suggest re-opening the OTRS ticket and asking the client to be more specific, but if they don't respond within a reasonable timeframe then I don't think we have much choice but to reluctantly Delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think the problem with the two discussions you cite is that the images were made especially for Wikipedia (ie made so that they would be useful to Wikipedia), but there's nothing to suggest they were made exclusively for Wikipedia (ie not intended to be used by third parties). In this case, permission was given "for Wikipedia" in the OTRS ticket, but the client didn't specify a license or say anything about reuse by third parties. I suggest re-opening the OTRS ticket and asking the client to be more specific, but if they don't respond within a reasonable timeframe then I don't think we have much choice but to reluctantly
- Comment: I'm not sure what is permissible here anymore. For example, these two files ([7], [8]) have been recognised as ok. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:SR_Slovenia_coa.png){kind=link}
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:SR_Serbia_coa.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
BadSVGs by Calgaryivan
[edit]
These are unused fictional flags, all of them BadSVGs. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lucas Grandin
[edit]- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8486.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8492.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8502.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8516.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8525.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8527.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8531.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8532.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8534.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8537.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8538.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8539.jpg
- File:Lucas Grandin MG 8544.jpg
- File:Roberto Paci Dalò - SUD Salon Urbain de Douala 2010 (147).jpg
- File:Roberto Paci Dalò - SUD Salon Urbain de Douala 2010 (148).jpg
- File:Roberto Paci Dalò - SUD Salon Urbain de Douala 2010 (149).jpg
- File:Roberto Paci Dalò - SUD Salon Urbain de Douala 2010 (264).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
iopensa (talk) 14:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- sorry, i made a mistake by using "perform batch task". I removed the request. --iopensa (talk) 14:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
We have an SVG of this flag. Fry1989 eh? 19:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- SVG have another ratio and colors. Skrod (talk) 20:59, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: I am certainly not aware of a policy that raster images should be deleted where vector versions are available. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 14:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
But you should be aware that there is a pratice to delete rasters if an SVG exists BEFORE it. Fry1989 eh? 18:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gustavito 281 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The images fall into two categories: possible copyvios and unused personal images.
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 44.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 42.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 41.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 40.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 39.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 38.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 37.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 36.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 35.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 34.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 33.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 32.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 30.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 29.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 28.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 27.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 25.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 24.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 23.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 22.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 21.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 20.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 19.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 18.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 17.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 16.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 15.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 14.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 13.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 12.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 11.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 10.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 08.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 09.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 07.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 06.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 05.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 04.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 02.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 03.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw In Facebook 01.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw 10.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw 09.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw 08.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw 07.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw 06.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw 04.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw 05.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw 02.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw 01.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw in facebook ;D 08.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw in facebook ;D 07.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw in facebook ;D 06.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw in facebook ;D 04.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw in facebook ;D 05.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw in facebook ;D 02.JPG
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw in facebook ;D 03.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw in facebook ;D 01.jpg
- File:Màìk Gùstàvò Òvàndò Gàsw in facebook ;).jpg
- File:Maik Ovando.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jespinos (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
derivative work, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scrabble board in play.jpg — raeky (talk | edits) 06:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:04, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Outside of scope, unclear what it is. Simonft (talk) 19:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Delete Agreed. It's probably personal art and therefore out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Schlechte Bildqualität, wurde durch "File:MyZeil Frankfurt Nacht.jpg" ersetzt. Pedelecs (talk) 20:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: As long as it's not terribly bad, we tend to keep images. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Ich wünsche ausdrücklich, dass dieses Bild von mir gelöscht wird, da ich dieses durch ein Neues ersetzt habe. Sollte dieser Löschantrag noch einemal gelöscht werden, werde ich keine neuen Bilder mehr in Wikimedia hochladen !!! Pedelecs (talk) 20:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete File does not seem to be in use and File:MyZeil Frankfurt Nacht.jpg is much better. So why not make uploader happy? --MGA73 (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Why make uploader unhappy? What's the problem with this picture? Why couldn't it be avantageuously used in derative work, etc? Xic 667 21:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep? The uploader wants the file to be deleted so I do not understand the argument here. --MGA73 (talk) 07:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader request and MGA73. INeverCry 07:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept I like this angle better, as it shows the hole at the bottom of the vortex. We do not generally delete images at the request of the uploader, particularly when they have been here for almost four years. Doing so removes the license trail for any off-WMF users there may be. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Qualitätsmängel - unscharf Pedelecs (talk) 11:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- It is in use here: http://de.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Thema:Reisen_mit_dem_Zug_in_Deutschland --MGA73 (talk) 18:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep in use, and let's not start deleting Wikivoyage images too eagerly. MKFI (talk) 21:58, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: in use McZusatz (talk) 10:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Ich wünsche ausdrücklich, dass dieses Bild von mir gelöscht wird, da dieses völlig unscharf ist. Sollte dieser Löschantrag noch einemal gelöscht werden, werde ich keine neuen Bilder mehr in Wikimedia hochladen !!! Pedelecs (talk) 20:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Administratoren können dieses Bild nicht löschen, solange es noch in der Nutzung ist. So schreiben das die Regeln vor. Falls du ein vergleichbares oder gar besseres Bild des gleichen Motivs hast und die Nutzung auf vikivoyage entfernst oder ersetzt, kann das Bild gelöscht werden. Andernfalls sehe ich nicht, wieso ein hilfreiches Bild, welches genutzt wird und keinen besseren Ersatz hat, gelöscht werden soll. --McZusatz (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept As McZusatz says, the file is in use. Our rules do not allow us to delete it. Given us a better image of this train and then we can delete this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Öscht endlich mal den Schrott von mier, ich stele sonst keine neuen und besseren Bilder von mir ein !!!! Pedelecs (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Low quality file not in use. --McZusatz (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uncontested DR McZusatz (talk) 09:20, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Qualitätsmängeö, wurde inzwischen durch "File:Klappergasse Ebbelwoi-Viertel Frankfurt Alt-Sachsenhausen.jpg" ersetzt. Pedelecs (talk) 20:16, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The two are very similar, but not identical. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Ich wünsche ausdrücklich, dass dieses Bild von mir gelöscht wird, da dieses verschwommen ist und ich ein Neues vom gleichen Ort hochgeladen habe. Sollte dieser Löschantrag noch einmal gelöscht werden, werde ich keine neuen Bilder mehr in Wikimedia hochladen !!! Pedelecs (talk) 21:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Low res, unused and no good reason to make photographer unhappy. --MGA73 (talk) 07:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm not aware of a gold version, and there's no source. If one can be provided, then the SVG file File:Palestine COA (alternative).svg can be altered. If there's no source, this needs to go. Fry1989 eh? 21:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- I'm so sorry, I forgot to put the sources of coat of arms, This file: File:Palestine COA (alternative).svg is the coat of arms of Palestinian National Authority, but my file is coat of arms of State of Palestine, and President of Palestinian National Authority "Mahmoud Abbas" adopted this slogan, according to these references (Arabic Wiki News, Russia Today, Al Arabiya, QNAOL, WAFA... and more.), and the logo was founded before but was not officially the State of Palestine (Note: many countries recognized Palestine as a state, and there are other countries that recognizes only in the Palestinian National Authority). This my references of the golden coat of arms (The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Palestinian Ministry of Interior, General Federation of Military Sports (Ministry of Interior)). --Faris El-Gwely (talk) 02:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the sources, I wasn't aware of that. However your file seems to be mostly based off of File:Coat of arms of Egypt (Official).svg. We should be able to use File:Palestine COA (alternative).svg as a template to make an SVG of the gold arms in your sources. Fry1989 eh? 04:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: In use. INeverCry 00:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Patricia2102 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems like the images are cropped from images taken by professional photographers.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jespinos (talk) 23:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)