Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/07/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 24th, 2012
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo, no educational value Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor resolution, OB = MEN ONLY MAY VIEW THIS IMAGE. ***** WARNING: BARE SKIN IN LOWER TORSO REGION **** Chesdovi (talk) 09:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:34, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for educational purposes. JamesSmith29 (talk) 01:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional, see userpage Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

archivo fallido Hunter1323 (talk) 01:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, prompt uploader request; orphan file of no particular apparent in scope usefulness. Infrogmation (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; unused image that doesn't serve much purpose. Prof. Professorson (talk) 12:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for deletion within two minutes of uploading? A discussion is going on in Wikipedia to create a branstar on Bhagavad Gita/Krishna, currently needed for that barnstar. Also has scope in Wikiproject Hinduism related discussions ! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 12:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If it ends up being used, it can be kept of course. But if you want to express gratitude to someone, I would suggest using an image that is a little more easy on the eyes; a blinking gif is what I would use to cause epilepsy to my worst enemies :) Prof. Professorson (talk) 12:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just today I have given an editor a barnstar who has been working really well in Chemistry related article, the same effect, but, I don't think it was too bad, see the discussion here. I agree in this image blinking is not working properly– right after uploading the image, I was thinking to use only 2 or 3 colours andd slow down speed (colour1 [2/3 seconds] Colour2 [2/3seconds).. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 12:40, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The chemistry barnstar is indeed much easier on the eyes (maybe because the colors are more diffuse?) I guess it would be better if it wasn't blinking as fast, but on the other hand, does it have to blink at all? Is it more gratifying that way? I would think that a nice (non-blinking) image and a thank you note would make for a fine barnstar. Prof. Professorson (talk) 12:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I use non-blinking barnstars too (actually mainly). This is one of my best creation so far w:Talk:Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi/GA2#Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi_Volunteer_Barnstar. non-blinking image.
About Chemistry barnstar, I'll talk to that editor, if he feels slowing down speed will be easier on the eyes, I'll make changes.
About Krishna image– currently I have slowed down animation 20 times (i.e. 20ms→400ms), and uploaded a new version. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No no, I think the Chemistry barnstar is fine; I was talking about the Krishna barnstar when I said it should be slower. Anyway, I'm going to close this DR as clearly there's use for this image. Thanks for your work. Prof. Professorson (talk) 13:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Prof. Professorson (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnny Controletti as Speedy (Wrong licence, there ist a (R) in the Logo) Sreejith K (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, false license claim Infrogmation (talk) 17:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Prof. Professorson (talk) 14:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the picture on the right. Prof. Professorson (talk) 16:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

De minimis. If you disagree I can delete it and just cut it to upload the sign on the left that is the real subject of the picture, as every shop in that street displayed it (the photo was unique or rare in comparison), I believe this can be checked in massmedia pics of those days. --Elitre (talk) 16:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think de minimis applies, because as you say, it would be easy enough to avoid including the copyrighted picture (i.e. the inclusion is not incidental). I think it would be best to crop it and delete the original version. Prof. Professorson (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I beg to differ. You are basically saying I should be punished because I suck at taking pictures and/or blamed because I don't only take pics for Commons. Still, there you go with the "clean version". BTW, people are asking me privately what I did to you to deserve this "attention". To the next report of my crimes here, bye. --Elitre (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A cropped version was then uploaded under the same name. --Elitre (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unidentified person and location Chesdovi (talk) 17:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted; Description "dgfhfhffg" -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unidentified person, location Chesdovi (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; uncategorized since January, insulting garbage file name, description " sfdgdf" -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SplashScreen as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg821/scaled.php?server=821&filename=0154768712870.jpg&res=landing Permission for this image is recorded in the OTRS system, though. —innotata 16:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Revoked Mistake made in my claims of copy-vio. 188.220.151.140 21:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SplashScreen as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg19/scaled.php?server=19&filename=0154768712881.jpg&res=landing Permission for use is recorded in the OTRS system, though. —innotata 16:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Revoked Mistake made in my claims of copy-vio. 188.220.151.140 21:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not within scope. The picture is not in use, nor is is is likely it ever will be. (See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Palestinians criticism not allowed5.jpg) Chesdovi (talk) 09:40, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy keep, please refrain from using DR as revanche fouls Denniss (talk) 10:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Israel criticism not allowed by latuff2.jpg

Unused, out of scope: each and every drawing by an "internationally known artist" does not necesarily belong here; if it does, then deriviations by other budding an "internationally known artists" should also feature. Thank you. Chesdovi (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept again. In use, in scope. Inappropriate renomination. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not true content and they using the platform to incite against Israel 109.160.132.154 11:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Same, per above. Bad nom. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

meaningless redirect DBigXray (talk) 17:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 11:19, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not certain that this should be deleted, but I think it should be at least discussed. Given that U.S. freedom of panorama is only for architecture, it seems to me that the copyrighted Dale Chihuly glass pieces may figure too prominently in this picture for us to keep it, under our policies. Other opinions sought. Jmabel ! talk 05:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover. Annual edition of 2008. Whether used in an earlier image of the cover - is unknown. Art-top (talk) 06:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:34, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

strongly doubt own work claim. looks more like a professional promotion picture. no source. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died December 30, 1945 - that's a little shy of 70 years. IF it is a keeper, the licensing has to be reworked. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Festspielhausentwurfallies.jpg. Leyo 07:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:35, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Festspielhausentwurfallies.jpg. Leyo 07:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:35, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Festspielhausentwurfallies.jpg. Leyo 07:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Festspielhausentwurfallies.jpg. Leyo 07:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:35, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Festspielhausentwurfallies.jpg. Leyo 07:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Festspielhausentwurfallies.jpg. Leyo 07:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Festspielhausentwurfallies.jpg. Leyo 07:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not free file, used for commercial purposes; out of scope for commons. Savhñ 09:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonsense, out of commons project Thiotrix (talk) 09:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy and graphics on mug. Also way out of scope. FunkMonk (talk) 09:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes at least one copyvio. Could be replaced. The collage is also badly constructed, with weird angles and bad lighting, and too much space given to an eagle, which is not related to these birds. FunkMonk (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing from user with 1 edit. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 10:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Martinez died in1970. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case.FOP in Spain applies only outdoors. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BadJPG, orphaned, better versions in Category:Scribd. Leyo 11:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buggy SVG, replaced by File:Iodige Saeure.png by the uploader. Leyo 11:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Peace Statue in the Nagasaki Peace Park seems to have been unveiled in 1955 with the opening of the park. The statue is by Seibo Kitamura, who died in 1987. Japanese copyright duration is 50 years pma, therefore the statue is under Japanese copyright until 1/1/2038. Because it was copyrighted in the source country on the URAA restoration date of 1/1/1996, the US copyright of 70 years pma will expire 1/1/2058. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nagasaki Statue. cmadler (talk) 13:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, unused personal photograph. Midwesterns are not Sentinelese. —Bill william comptonTalk 13:26, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality .jpg, replaced by File:D-эритрулоза.png and other files in the same category. Leyo 13:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear rights and authorship (if guitarist is on picture, he doubtfully is photographer?) Funfood 13:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:34, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality .jpg, replaced by File:L-эритрулоза.png and other files in the same category. Leyo 13:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author. Other version was already deleted as unsourced and questionable WhiteWriter speaks 14:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Karl Goetz died in 1950 (de:Karl Goetz): PD-old-70 does not apply. Rd232 (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is the author of the book, but there's no evidence that the author owns the rights to the images or cover design present, or that the publisher has consented. Chris the Paleontologist (talk | contribs) 15:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only logo of company with questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto weicht erheblich von inzwischen restaurierten Original ab. Das MAK stellt ein eigenes Foto bei Wikimedia Commons ein. Tfm4wiki (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

This flag is wrong, it's not the Alcala's flag and is superseded by this one:
Bandera de Argelia
Jyon (talk) 16:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:34, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, no location given, too small? Chesdovi (talk) 16:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:KF Renova logo.svg Froztbyte (talk) 16:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional, WP:SCOPE Chesdovi (talk) 17:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope poster Chesdovi (talk) 17:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, unidentified person and location Chesdovi (talk) 17:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is of low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is of low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 17:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Engee .jpg Froztbyte (talk) 17:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Philippines. 84.61.167.13 18:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image version deleted. (File:Nivea Soares e Gustavo Soares Ao Lado.jpg) Tiago Abreu (talk) 19:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy. 84.61.167.13 19:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:34, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is of low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 19:26, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Armenia. This is a recent sculpture, and it appears that the sculptor is still living. Armenian copyright duration is 70 years pma, so this will be under copyright until at least 1/1/2083 (if the sculptor dies this year). cmadler (talk) 20:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:36, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: now FOP in Armenia - Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard&oldid=96202242--Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Armenia; copyright term is 70 years pma. The sculptor, Fernando Botero, is still alive, so this will remain under copyright until at least 1/1/2083 (if he dies this year). cmadler (talk) 20:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: now FOP in Armenia - Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard&oldid=96202242--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lobo as Speedy (Not educationally useful) Sreejith K (talk) 20:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, donc marque déposée Mathis B (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC) REPONSE  : de la meme manière que l'image http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:V_und_B_Stempel_res.jpg dans ces cas là, pourquoi avoir accepter le précedent et non celui ci ? voir aussi l'article L513-6 du code de la propriété intellectuelle http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Villeroy_boch_logo.jpg[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iceland. The statue was sculpted by Helgi Gíslason and was revealed on 13th February 2010. Snaevar (talk) 21:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:33, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality panorama of an unidentified landscape with trees. Doubtfully own work also. Funfood 22:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:35, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for statues in the the US. Materialscientist (talk) 23:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear authorship, see better resolution with watermark on [[1]] AtelierMonpli (talk) 06:09, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with all the files, RS sailboats, uploaded by User:Mansell123. --Barbetorte (talk) 08:37, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without any information. :( Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 07:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:15, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 07:43, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:15, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the author and the uploader are not the same person 109.195.17.254 12:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:16, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with dubious copyright. Appears to have originally been uploaded to en.wp to illustrate a promotional article. The en.wp image is unused too, and I don't think it's in scope. Prof. Professorson (talk) 12:36, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder for the closing admin: if File:Cobra pearl.jpg is deleted, Category:Nine Sacred Pearls is likely to be empty (the two other images in there were copyright violations), so it should be deleted as well. Prof. Professorson (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:16, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On this page, the same image shows "© BA 721". Therefore it is doubtful that the uploader was the author of the picture. Badzil (talk) 13:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment One the one hand missing exif also supports the thesis, that the uploader is not author of the picture but on the other hand the resolution of the uploaded image is higher than the other image from the web...
Maybe the uploader could upload a high res version of the file and/or could send a permission to COM:OTRS. --McZusatz (talk) 18:57, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that the photographs used are also {{Own}}. Leyo 13:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:CRENC BioOlioDaRifiuti.jpg. --Leyo 15:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, small size, self promotion "goodluck..." Chesdovi (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal birthday invite Chesdovi (talk) 17:02, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

should be deleted, accidental creation by me. matanya talk 19:20, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Chesdovi (talk) 17:37, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user seems to be exceptionally active in searching for media meriting deletion and "nominating" them in what seems like an en-mass distribution of deletion requests in the past days. Apart from my opinion on such an anomalous non-productive activity I'm saying very unequivocally Keep the image (and hope others come also to appreciate this brilliant photograph) Orrlingtalk 18:07, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio FASTILY (TALK) 01:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan. 84.61.167.13 18:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Written in Japanese) いわゆる「屋外美術」にあたるかどうかということですね。「着ぐるみ」が恒久的に設置される美術物かというと、そうではありません。そうだという説明を削除提案者はするべきです。--Sanjo (talk) 14:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file by accident instead of the clean PNG version: File:Dryopteris × benedictii NY-dist-map.png, which I subsequenlty uploaded. Nonenmac (talk) 23:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:19, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see no indication that the uploader of this file holds the copyright for this file. OTRS permission would probably be needed.  Ryan Vesey Review me! 16:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded to prove a point about Commons:Deletion requests/File:National Front at London Gay Pride 2007.jpg, out of scope now. Prof. Professorson (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why it would be out of scope. It shows a public event which is very much in scope. The fact that the other image was deleted is irreleavant. Yann (talk) 04:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is a newsworthy image of a current social event. In time, this type of images become historial record. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Wizardman 16:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photograph, which lacks the permission of the person portraited posing nude Welt-der-Form (talk) 10:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A permission should not be necessary because this image was released under a Creative Commons license which is sufficiently free for this Wikimedia media project. I can remember thatnthere was a special notice thatncan be place below the image in order to show that personality rights have to be protected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.2.49.208 (talk • contribs)

  •  Keep Looking at the photo in the context of the set on Flickr, it seems to be taken at a beach. (Toplessness at beaches is not considered "nudity" in many places, and beaches are generally not considered "private" places.) This person and others are in multiple photos in the set, apparently a group of friends enjoying a day at the beach. The set of photos have been publicly on Flickr under a free license for almost 2 years. The allegations of the nominator seem unsupported. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:22, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG at File:Flag of the United States.svg Fry1989 eh? 20:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perfectly valid reasoning. Don't upload inferior formats of a flag when we already have an SVG. SVGs are scalable, they serve any purpose and size requirement. Fry1989 eh? 19:55, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep National symbols are not copyrightable. Fma12 (talk) 17:25, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a matter of copyright, it's a matter of duplication. We have an SVG, we actually have many, we also have the flag in other formats. We don't need yet another one. Fry1989 eh? 20:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vector version available at file:00-Oeil-eye.svg Tiger66 (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality drawing from user with 1 edit. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 10:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Per Infrogmation. May be used as an example of the encaustic painting technique. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:49, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMHO no own work by the uploader. If it is please provide a high-res version. ALE! ¿…? 22:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is my own work, i can provide a high res version, I have uploaded Melissamorgan.tif which is same photo in high res, you can also see that its my work at www.devindehaven.com Devindehaven
Thank you for the will to provide a high-red version. But please upload it as JPG and not as TIF. And just upload it over the current version. Thank you! --ALE! ¿…? 07:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep in this case. It would be nice if uploader could give a date--perhaps a year like 2004 or 2005. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

keep, own work have been prooved. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 20:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Coyau (talk) 17:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Melissamorgan.jpg

Also File:Melissamorgan.tif. Published at http://www.devindehaven.com/#/covers/7 so needs COM:OTRS. Not sure why previous DR was closed as Kept. Was OTRS given somewhere? Wknight94 talk 02:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted No OTRS sended, no own work proved Ezarateesteban 17:08, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of plans by Joseph Charles Fowell. This is non-free in Australia until 70 years after his death, or 2041. Alternatively, we could get permission from whoever is the current owner of that copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If it was drawn by looking at the actual building, it should be covered by COM:FOP#Australia, shouldn't it? Prof. Professorson (talk) 16:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so. FOP#Australia is for taking photographs. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seems broader than that. Prof. Professorson (talk) 18:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
BTW I've notified the uploader of this discussion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I transferred this file to the commons, but I am not its original uploader. I'm not familiar with any applicable Australian laws and can't contribute to this discussion. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Prof. Professorson, this is covered by FOP Sven Manguard Wha? 05:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to me this would seem to be a derivative work of the Windows icon for deleting files. Liliana-60 (talk) 01:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...which can be assumed to be in the public domain. Microsoft is delivering most of these icons with i.e. Visual Studio suggesting to use the same icons for similar tasks. --PaterMcFly (talk) 19:46, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since when do we assume things at Commons? -- Liliana-60 (talk) 22:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What I've found is this statement (the "licensing terms" they talk about says that the icons must only be used for the indicated purpose, meaning i.e. an icon for deleting must be used to indicate deleting - this is not a problem here). Also, the icon is rather different from the Windows one, not more than the idea could have been taken over (which is not copyrightable). Also, the image here is rather old, so I wouldn't bet its even older than the windows image, as they have been changing with every version or service pack. --PaterMcFly (talk) 19:34, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 00:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's nothing necessarily wrong with having a hypothetical speculative flag, but unfortunately someone insists on keeping adding it to Wikipedia articles, which makes it more of a pernicious hoax image than a harmless fantasy image. I'm getting tired of cleaning up the resulting mess, and the quickest way of putting an end to the nonsense would be to delete this image. AnonMoos (talk) 04:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 00:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mokod Pich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - low resolution photos without original exif and spam logo. Look like as promo action.

Art-top (talk) 04:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 03:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mcoxy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - low resolution photos without original exif.

Art-top (talk) 05:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 03:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varghesejacob (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There's an OTRS ticket for some of the images, however, the OTRS ticket is suspect as they are throw-away gmail accounts supposedly from Ministry of Defence, Government of India officials and therefore should not be used. The other problem is that the user has been socking extensively here and on en-wiki and claiming all sorts of things including flickr washing, claiming that he's in politics and took images of Barack Obama addressing the Indian parliament (when on the exact same day that the incident happened, he was editing using an IP in Michigan) and so on. The main account is Vrghs jacob, many socks have been blocked here and on en.wiki

SpacemanSpiff 05:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


SpacemanSpiff 06:02, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I marked several images that are sourced and where taken by photographer of the US Federal Government and so are Public Domain and so can stay in Commons. Tm (talk) 12:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KienzleU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - low resolution photos without original exif.

Art-top (talk) 20:57, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by KienzleU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos of insignificant organizations. Out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Yann (talk) 09:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grandpruneaushow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution photos without original exif. In exif on some of the photos indicated original author. Doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 08:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 03:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elmayordomofiel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship. Low resolution photos without exif, photos taken with different cameras. All photos in different style and quality from amateur to professional.

Art-top (talk) 10:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 03:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trucka Oficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

An additional two files with the same problems (see above).

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chile 97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Primitive self-drawn logos. Unused, out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 10:00, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chile 97 (talk · contribs)

Derivatives of football club logos. A perhaps moot point, but web resolution and presence of extra elements (e.g. the bars at the bottom of File:Iberia en pes.jpg and File:Magallanes en pes.jpg) might suggest they were even taken from a website, not uploader's own derivatives. See also discussions above (resulting in delete), user talk page, and user deleted contribs: serial copyvio uploader.

Эlcobbola talk 18:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Gone --Denniss (talk) 01:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Covers, posters and screenshots without permission. Probably the user is the author or copyright holder of these images, he has repeatedly warned of the need to acknowledge authorship of previously published works by COM:OTRS. But there was no reaction.

Art-top (talk) 23:15, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Владимир Чекмарев

Most of the files in low resolution without exif. Some of them watermarked. Some of them look like as video frames. Some of them photographs of the person who can not make the person self. Doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 12:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted --Denniss (talk) 07:33, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ecvcsnbvdsihv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mysterious exif, small/inconsistent resolution, size variety, obviously TV program scans with unknown authorship

Gunnex (talk) 19:02, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:54, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onekrazyrican (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. The uploader has uploaded several copyright violations, and does not seem to understand or care about copyright.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:38, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 03:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Montoneros

[edit]

All those files are about Montoneros, a terrorist group that was active in Argentina during the 1970s and 1980s decades. They are tagged with the {{PD-AR-Photo}} licence. As such, they are in public domain in Argentina 25 years afterwards. However, those from 1971 and later (all the ones included here are after that year) were still under copyright at the URAA date (1996, just 14 years later, see here), and as such they are still under copyright at the US. Thus, they should be deleted.

As I was preparing this DR, I included as well the ERP, the Madres and Abuelas, and some other related people. They are from the same war, and the situation is basically the same in what copyright is concerned.

Note that this deletion request does not involve all the content of the categories: the photos that use other licences (such as some modern photos of these people) are not included here. --Cambalachero (talk) 21:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:19, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]