Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/07/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 6th, 2012
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A likely copyright violation. The image can be found all over the Internet. Voxii (talk) 00:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Webiste (http://www.behance.net/gallery/Little-Slide-Dress/3932109) is attribution non-commercial no derivitives, so outside our accepted bounds Sven Manguard Wha? 00:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid own work claim, this is a screenshot from what I believe to be a blog, and is non-free Sven Manguard Wha? 04:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done : copyvio. --M0tty (talk) 13:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After identifying several uploads (near all in 02.2012, the last one - 14.06.2012 - was copyvio too) by user Oluap2512 as copyvio: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (missing exif etc.) so this one (unknown source) can't be believed either. Gunnex (talk) 13:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most likely copyright violation Polarlys (talk) 13:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private picture George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, promotional George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www2.csic.khc.edu.tw/stu_wanted/%E6%A0%A1%E5%9C%92%E5%8F%8A%E7%92%B0%E5%A2%831.htm --Wz4088 (talk) 06:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CV shizhao (talk) 00:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:25, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; this image is not used on any wikimedia project and the encyclopedic value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 14:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 20:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private file - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 20:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 21:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:12, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:12, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:25, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self-made drawing - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:32, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dupe of File:Flag of the Netherlands.svg Fry1989 eh? 20:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused scaled down duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the Netherlands.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:29, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.Kwj2772 (talk) 12:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, doubtful authorship (low resolution). Probably game screenshot. Art-top (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private drawing - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 21:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny version of File:Rosalynwildinfo.jpg Sven Manguard Wha? 01:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done, deleted for duplicate. --M0tty (talk) 13:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:33, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, copyright violation Reality006 (talk) 06:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:33, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded this svg file Rounakr94 (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 05:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded this svg file Rounakr94 (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Wvk (talk) 05:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Havang(nl) (talk) 18:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Havang(nl) (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private file - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.flickr.com/photos/tordis/4885761649/ : license is "All rights reserved" Defeder (talk) 20:32, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:30, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theonelilith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, no educational value. facebook material

Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:00, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juandiaz336 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos, logos and documents. Photos in low resolution, all - without permission. Doubtful authorship, out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tomaz junior (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: text-only images which could be replaced with math mark-up. Looks unused.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChetanYadav23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private blog. Looks unused.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Messifan98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private photos - out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 20:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 05:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accept that any single cover is de minimis, but 95% of this photo is of copyrighted works. That surely cannot be covered by DM. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Meh, other one was already kept. Stupid consensus. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted characters; this is not de minimis at all. 1989 18:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No change since last time. Yann (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently it was taken from http://www.cmb.org.co/portal/mensaje-del-pastor.html - no indication that it is in fact under a free license, and own work claim very dubious Sven Manguard Wha? 01:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 01:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find where this was released under a free license, or whether it was released by the club (which are, I'll note, two seperate things). Sven Manguard Wha? 01:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 01:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:North Lowndes Park2.jpg Mjrmtg (talk) 02:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, for duplicate. Thanks to use {{Duplicate}} template in this case. --M0tty (talk) 13:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate deleted FASTILY (TALK) 01:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks suspiciously like a screenshot from a video. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue is most likely copyrighted. The statue was dedicated in 1982 and as such is most likely not public domain. Rockfang (talk) 03:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Possibly unfree FASTILY (TALK) 01:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Band logo. Coupled with the user's other uploads, one of which is a video clip also claimed as own work, it's likely that this is a false own work claim. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 01:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irregardless of the OTRS (which I can't find, BTW) the sole owner of Mickey Mouse is Disney, and the club has no legal right to release this. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. Isn't Mickey the only image in the universe that has copyright protection for 10,000 years? A speedy delete may be in order. The OTRS is pending which means it may not have a ticket # yet. I suppose someone may wish to explain to the uploader about copyrights as well. They probably mean well but may not understand the laws.--Canoe1967 (talk) 14:15, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have OTRS photosubmission and permissions-commons access, I checked for an email before listing this and didn't see one. And Mickey dosen't have 10,000 year protection, that's a myth... mostly. Please don't give Walt Disney Corp. any ideas. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am probably confused about OTRS then. I thought that image needs to be uploaded first. This will give it a file name for the email to OTRS. When OTRS recieves the email then they assign a ticket # to it? Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong. Is there any truth to the myth that Disney has some sort of extended copyright? Is it because Walt was frozen and not really dead, so date of creator's death hasn't happened yet?--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Walt Disney is in fact well and truly dead. Which is a good thing, becuase he was a horrible person that spent a lot of energy supporting some horrible things. The whole "Mickey Mouse has extended copyright" thing is true though, mostly. Read the Wikipedia article on the act pejoritively called the "Mickey Mouse Copyright Extension Act" for details. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:27, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Non-free derivative work FASTILY (TALK) 01:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If my memory is correct this is a television show, and therefore the free software license isn't valid and the own work claim in the other license is incorrect. Will defer to someone who can read Chinese at a higher level than I for confirmation. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 01:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mounted image with unknown sources (except File:SFrancis-SJdelRei1-CCBYSA.jpg) Gunnex (talk) 06:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW, missing source information. FASTILY (TALK) 01:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope FASTILY (TALK) 01:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems copyvio. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, building appears new enough to still have architectural copyright. 99of9 (talk) 07:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was built between 1990 and 1992, you're right : JW Marriott Cannes Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 12:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FOP in France FASTILY (TALK) 01:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Fotograf ist leider nicht bekannt. Das Foto ist von 1934, nun ist es hochwahrscheinlich, dass der Fotograf dann 1942 noch gelebt hat. Das Bild muss leider gelöscht werden. Gruß vom Graf Foto (talk) 07:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wenn der Fotograf unbekannt ist, dann ist bei einem Bild von 1938 die Aussage, dass er mehr als 70 Jahre tot ist sehr mutig, das Gegenteil dürfte hochwahrscheinlich zutreffen. Das Bild muss leider gelöscht werden. Gruß vom Graf Foto (talk) 07:59, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:04, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wenn der Fotograf unbekannt ist, dann ist bei einem Bild von 1938 die Aussage, dass er mehr als 70 Jahre tot ist sehr mutig, das Gegenteil dürfte hochwahrscheinlich zutreffen. Das Bild muss leider gelöscht werden. Gruß vom Graf Foto (talk) 07:59, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:04, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redundant file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goesseln (talk • contribs) 20:06, 4 July 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Author requests deletion. --Sreejith K (talk) 08:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Author requested delete FASTILY (TALK) 01:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Pd-textlogo. The snake drawing is indeed copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 08:45, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not PD-textlogo FASTILY (TALK) 01:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an image taken of an item at Disneyland Paris. France has no FoP for recent works. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP in France FASTILY (TALK) 01:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif. Art-top (talk) 09:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtuful authorship - promo photo in low resolution without exif. Similar, less crudely processed images can be found on the Internet (for example here, here). Art-top (talk) 09:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo without permission Art-top (talk) 09:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence of permission FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, broken. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dumitru Serban is still alive, and there is no freedom of panorama in Romania, so this image is a copyvio. Rosenzweig τ 22:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The permission seems not to grant that publications on Blogger are indeed in Public Domain. Lymantria (talk) 10:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:Coats of arms. This drawing of the coat of arms does not appear to be 100 years old. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in the US (item erected in 1990) Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bogus source claim Chesdovi (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the country of origin of this photo is Argentina. Martin H. (talk) 11:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source to support this flag has ever been what it is said to be, i.e. "flag of the kingdom of Koukou". Fanfwah (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After identifying several uploads (near all in 02.2012, the last one - 14.06.2012 - was copyvio too) by user Oluap2512 as copyvio: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (missing exif etc.) so this one (unknown source) can't be believed either. Gunnex (talk) 13:29, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

After identifying several uploads (near all in 02.2012, the last one - 14.06.2012 - was copyvio too) by user Oluap2512 as copyvio: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (missing exif etc.) so this one (unknown source) can't be believed either. Gunnex (talk) 13:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation and outside of Commons:Project scope. Looks like a scan of a dithered black and white printed image, and the source is "my documents." Also, not realistically useful for educational purposes given that the uploader didn't bother to tell us what the image depicts. This 2008 upload is their only edit on any Wikimedia project. LX (talk, contribs) 14:12, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a living sculptor, born 1943. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of a living sculptor, born 1943. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately the FOP exception does not apply in this case.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims. Downloading http://images03.olx.com.pe/ui/2/66/42/24716442_1.jpg from http://limacallao.olx.com.pe/traspaso-restaurante-boulevard-asia-iid-24716442 results in a file timestamped 2009-04-02, five months before it was uploaded here. LX (talk, contribs) 14:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:32, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marcelo Silvera himself uploaded this file because he is in the program of the event. I dubt' he has the rights over the image of Olga Delgrossi used here. Zeroth (talk) 15:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several images uploaded by the user of actors and actress he took from the internet were deleted. All but this. I think he has to really prove this is a picture taken by him. Zeroth (talk) 15:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of not significant site. Test upload (see description). Art-top (talk) 17:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image published in 2011, uploaded to the Commons - in 2012. Doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 18:02, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work. Art-top (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo image in low resolution - doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution for own work - doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 18:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif. Art-top (talk) 18:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif. Art-top (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be a scan, so I doubt it is own work as stated Avron (talk) 19:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif. Art-top (talk) 20:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mparedes06 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - low resolution professional photos.

Art-top (talk) 09:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LFranco17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution professional photos. Doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 01:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanketptl1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images in low reslolution, no original exif. Doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrea B.W. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims. Low-resolution photos with no EXIF. The uploader also claimed that EnsayoPA.jpg, uploaded after these files, was their "own work" when it was actually someone else's non-free photo that they found using Google. They also uploaded PASUR.jpg, another non-free Internet image. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Boulevard1.jpg.

LX (talk, contribs) 15:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peacockeffect (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JotaLAlvarez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eykell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of promo-photos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafa Marks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - images not in full camera resolution, without exif or taken with different cameras. Also see notes to some files.

Art-top (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wbeducare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution for own work, no original exif - doubtful authorship.

Art-top (talk) 20:04, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 07:04, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patricksofian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship. Professional photos, many of then in low resolution without exif. Other uploads by user deleted as copyvio.

Art-top (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Hochladende hat auf Nachfrage nicht darlegen können oder wollen, dass eine Genehmigung der abgebildeten Person zu Veröffentlichung des Fotos vorliegt. Ich denke hier liegt ein Verstoß gegen das Recht am eigenen Bild vor, da es keine Person der Zeitgeschichte ist und sie klar erkennbar Motiv und kein Beiwerk ist. Weissbier (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, presenter User:SarahStierch is the only clearly-identifiable subject. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, und? Wollsen Sie Frau Stierch ihr Recht am eigenen Bild per Order Mufti aberkennen? Weissbier (talk) 08:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Considering she has a picture of herself posted at w:User:SarahStierch, I suspect it's not an issue. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your interest in this picture. This is a picture of a presenter at a public event and legal under german law but I will not be disappointed if you delete it because I don't need it. As author I'll stay  Neutral --Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 08:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Hochladende hat auf Nachfrage nicht darlegen können oder wollen, dass eine Genehmigung der abgebildeten Person zu Veröffentlichung des Fotos vorliegt. Ich denke hier liegt ein Verstoß gegen das Recht am eigenen Bild vor, da es keine Person der Zeitgeschichte ist und sie klar erkennbar Motiv und kein Beiwerk ist. Weissbier (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, presenter is the only identifiable person. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seit wann hat der Vortrgende bei einer Besprechung kein Recht am eigenen Bild mehr? Ist das eine Kundgebung im öffentlichen Raum? Ich sehe Wände, also ist es das nicht. Weissbier (talk) 08:32, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your interest in this picture. This is a picture of a presenter at a public event and legal under german law but I will not be disappointed if you delete it because I don't need it. As author I'll stay  Neutral --Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 08:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Hochladende hat auf Nachfrage nicht darlegen können oder wollen, dass eine Genehmigung der abgebildeten Person zu Veröffentlichung des Fotos vorliegt. Ich denke hier liegt ein Verstoß gegen das Recht am eigenen Bild vor, da es keine Person der Zeitgeschichte ist und sie klar erkennbar Motiv und kein Beiwerk ist. Weissbier (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral -- did the participants have to sign a photo release, Christoph? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your interest in this picture. It shows the athomsphere of a public event and is therefore clearly legal under german law. The person in the foreground has been notified per mail and was well aware of the upload before, but I have no signed contract. I will not be disappointed if you delete it because I don't need it. As author I'll stay  Neutral --Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 10:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 08:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Hochladende hat auf Nachfrage nicht darlegen können oder wollen, dass eine Genehmigung der abgebildeten Person zu Veröffentlichung des Fotos vorliegt. Ich denke hier liegt ein Verstoß gegen das Recht am eigenen Bild vor, da es keine Person der Zeitgeschichte ist und sie klar erkennbar Motiv und kein Beiwerk ist. Weissbier (talk) 20:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it's clear that User:SarahStierch was consenting to that picture being taken by a Team Community member. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Da hst Du aber eine fein polierte Glaskugel oder was genau bringt Dich zu der kühnen These? Ein Schnappschuss bei einer Besprechung/einem Kaffeekränzchen impliziert bei Dir eine Genhmigung zur Veröffentlichung? Ja nee, is klar. Weissbier (talk) 08:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
When a Wikimedian is at a Wikimedia event and poses for another Wikimedian, it would seem improbable that they wouldn't expect the picture to show up on Commons. :-) What's next, nominating File:JeffreyRImmeltAugust2009.jpg for deletion? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:27, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your interest in this picture. This is a picture of a presenter at a public event and legal under german law but I will not be disappointed if you delete it because I don't need it. As author I'll stay  Neutral --Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I am the subject! It's totally acceptable to have this photo up! Now..there are some less flattering photographs of me I'd happily give you permission to delete ;) Sarah (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 08:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Hochladende hat auf Nachfrage nicht darlegen können oder wollen, dass eine Genehmigung der abgebildeten Person zu Veröffentlichung des Fotos vorliegt. Ich denke hier liegt ein Verstoß gegen das Recht am eigenen Bild vor, da es keine Person der Zeitgeschichte ist und sie klar erkennbar Motiv und kein Beiwerk ist. Weissbier (talk) 20:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your interest in this picture. It shows the athomsphere of a public event and is therefore clearly legal under german law. The persons in the foreground have been notified per mail and were well aware of the upload before, but I have no signed contract. I will not be disappointed if you delete it because I don't need it. As author I'll stay  Neutral --Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 10:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 08:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bertuzzi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I think author identity confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. Also images may use images made by other people.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: .      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, derivate of a Damian Hirst installation h-stt !? 14:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Detail of an artwork of a living artist, no free licensing possible. The last deletion equest decision is a joke. Julius1990 (talk) 15:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, that shark in something resembling water is not protectable. --Denniss (talk) 14:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Can't copyright a shark, some glass, formaldehyde, or an idea. Being artwork doesn't make something copyrightable automatically --moogsi (blah) 15:08, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept for the reasons stated by Moogsi. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, derivate of a Damian Hirst installation h-stt !? 14:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Shark83.JPG

Artwork of a living artist, no free licensing possible. Julius1990 (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, that shark in something resembling water is not protectable. --Denniss (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For that i would want a qualified answer, not just a personal opinion. --Julius1990 (talk) 06:17, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a qualified answer and the DR wil be closed as kept. --Denniss (talk) 09:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you call this a qualified answer it is just a further proof that commons turns out to be a joke. --Julius1990 (talk) 11:07, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Copyright does not apply to ideas or processes. Nothing in this artwork is subject to copyright, unless you can argue that the tank isn't utilitarian --moogsi (blah) 15:07, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept for the reasons given by Moogsi. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requests deletion, also violates COM:PEOPLE -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 17:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source information provided. Not possible to know whether it's in the public domain or not 83.42.247.238 21:59, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - subject died 1923, so it's almost certainly {{PD-1923}}, and if the 1895 date is correct, the odds are decent that it falls under the 80-year post morterm auctoris criteria at Commons:Licensing#Spain.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wenn der Fotograf unbekannt ist, dann ist bei einem Bild von 1934 die Aussage, dass er mehr als 70 Jahre tot ist sehr mutig, das Gegenteil dürfte hochwahrscheinlich zutreffen. Das Bild muss leider gelöscht werden. Gruß vom Graf Foto (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph was taken in Italy during the 1934 FIFA World Cup (1934 Jules Rimet Cup). Maybe, you can try to use the licence {{PD-Italy}} --Danyele (talk) 20:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Photograph taken and published in Italy before 1976 thus in PD in the USA also and eligible for Commons SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is small and obsolete. --Marrovi (talk) 23:19, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the question of Marovi on my talk page.
Here a list of the other images he likes to get removed:
(I fixed th deletion request(s) now for him). He listed more images on my discussion page but didn't tried to nominate them for deletion. Those images I omitted here. --JuTa 19:16, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 09:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]