Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/06/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 28th, 2012
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image, taken from http://www.guildwars2.com C.Nilsson (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious cases may use {{Copyvio}} Эlcobbola talk 18:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of low technical quality, in addition to the fact that we have quite enough images of this body part. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, another low quality self-penis pic. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a derivative work (Photoshop) without sourcing information about where the two works were derived from. The football player photo is probably a commercial, copyrighted photograph. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 19:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the owner of work Alexcarbonell


Deleted: Obvious cases may use {{Copyvio}} - see, for example, http://www.cuencahoy.info/noticia/para-elisa-primera-pelicula-del-conquense-juan-ramon-fernandez Эlcobbola talk 19:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't want to upload. Sg info (talk) 20:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Movie screenshot Sreejith K (talk) 20:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Feel free to use this photo" is not a sucifient permission for us. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 02:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: The file doesn't meet the threshold of originality, because consist only in simple shapes and text: text with black border and the dices forming a trapezium. So {{PD-textlogo}} is the most correct permissions tag. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • With the hands and stuff, I am not so sure. Plus, while it is over in the PRC side, some characters were copyrighted so I would suggest to find any Taiwanese ruling. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 17:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • I just contacted the girl again and will change the licence upon her reply. I believe she is willing to grant further permission. But you know it may be a little bit complicated to explain Wikipedia's copyright regulation to a 13-year-old student... P.S. PRC has nothing to do at all in the discussion, the referendum, or the legal rights of works in either Taiwan island or Matsu island. -- Wildcursive (talk) 08:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • OK, she has replied that she "releases this work to public domain and grant permission to anyone to use or modify this work for any purpose." (同意本圖案釋放至公共領域, 允許使用, 散布, 重製, 並適用於全世界。) So I just removed the deletion template. Feel free to notice me if you have any other question. Thanks! -- Wildcursive (talk) 12:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There is permission. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 15:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 04:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 15:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:05, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 06:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose. Image of a not notable person. OTAVIO1981 (talk) 11:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author unknown, believed to be from the 1904 book cited as the source, so copyright status in source country is unknown. (Still kept on the English Wikipedia for this reason.) —innotata 14:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, —innotata 15:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 16:21, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tom Morris as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "Jeremyawesome" is probably not the creator of the Columbia Nashville logo. Sreejith K (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Might not meet COM:TOO but I think it is {{Out of scope}} --Sreejith K (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above, blatant false license & source claim; orphan. -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another penis shot that adds nothing to Commons. The image is also badly out of focus, so out of scope. Provides no useful descriptive information to justify inclusion. Likely another vanity display. O'Dea (talk) 13:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


upload new file Makka (talk) 15:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, another blurry orphan vanity penis pic. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Indian boy penis.jpg

Image of low technical quality and, in addition, uploader's own image description as "boy penis" may confict with US law 2257. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted, same image, same name, uploaded by different account name. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source website doesn't have a statement that their works are PD and the article comes from other published sources. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 16:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:47, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Website says Copyright 2010 by - Florence Unified School District User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 16:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:47, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, as a useless self-created "art" collage. In addition, as per uploaders description, the photos used for this collage are not his own and no evidence has been provided for the claim that they are, in part PD. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality (low res., ugly compression artifacts), replaced by File:Ferrocyphen.png. Leyo 13:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As chemically incorrect: should be the N not the C of each ring that bonds to the Fe. But the dark-wedged bonds are also not clearly drawn to their respective N in the proposed .png or derivative .svg replacements. DMacks (talk) 10:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 19:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Well... this photo certainly isn't public domain and the uploader definitly didn't shoot it. ~ Avaholic (talk) 22:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Copy Vio --Leech44 (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 05:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photoshop/parody of this image, an album cover by the band Bad English. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, without description, doubtful authorship and educational use. Art-top (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no educational purpose. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:41, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, contains a copyrighted image (Mazda). —Tom Morris (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, contains a copyrighted image (Nissan). —Tom Morris (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, contains a copyrighted image (Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep/Ram logos). —Tom Morris (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, contains a copyrighted image (Mitsubishi/Kia). —Tom Morris (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, contains a copyrighted image (Kia). —Tom Morris (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, contains a copyrighted image (Kia). —Tom Morris (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, contains a copyrighted image (Kia). —Tom Morris (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, contains a copyrighted image (Kia). —Tom Morris (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I won´t use. Camila Juhrs Flaire (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope and per Uploader's request George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because i won´t use. Camila Juhrs Flaire (talk) 17:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope and per Uploader's request George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because i won´t use Camila Juhrs Flaire (talk) 17:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope and per Uploader's request George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because i won´t use Camila Juhrs Flaire (talk) 17:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope and per Uploader's request George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably {{Out of scope}}. And too small to be of any use. Sreejith K (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably {{Out of scope}}. And too small to be of any use. Sreejith K (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either an attack image or childish nonsense. Not realistically useful for educational purposes. Outside of Commons:Project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 21:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image outside the scope of projects. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is outside the scoupe of the projects Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not illustrative, has no purpose. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 00:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG with embedded raster graphics. Replaced with File:Hiyama-Denmark General.svg. Leyo 09:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 14:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work how can it become own work Napoleon 100 (talk) 06:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - There is no reason for deletion. A title page printed in 1672 is obviously Public Domain, so the uploader just made the common mistake thinking that the scanning creates some kind of copyright. / Achird (talk) 07:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep please. Many newcommers uses by default the CC license, and own work does not mean them, but a misuse of the permissions by ingorance. Assuming good faith implies simply change the CC license with {{PD-old}} in these kind of files, and wrong or missing permissions tag is not a valid reason for delete a file. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep:Per Achird and Amitie 10g.--FAEP (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image change to PD-Old Эlcobbola talk 21:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 15:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Appears to be a scan or otherwise a derivative. Lower resolution; no metadata Эlcobbola talk 21:26, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file was is a copy of [2] but http://www.focus-news.net/ content is copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 23:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Это не правда - брал этот файл свободным. - Gubin, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Т. е. я не понял, как правильно оформлять загруженный файл. Потому что когда я загрузил файл с ссылкой на источник, мне было дано оповещение, что дана недостаточная информация и он был сразу удален. - Gubin, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
    • Его нельзя загружать, а потому вопрос об оформлении снимается автоматически. Вы же спрашиваете о том, как бы так написать при загрузке, чтобы никто не догадался, что файл-то нелегальный. Вы просите советов по тому, как лучше солгать? Вы же солгали, заявив при загрузке, что файл якобы Ваш собственный. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 18:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation Эlcobbola talk 21:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file was is a copy of [4] but http://www.focus-news.net/ content is copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 23:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Эlcobbola talk 21:34, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio - Same image found on that site=> see http://apisystems.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/rucher-de-thermo-ruche-dans-le-gard.jpg, with the same EXIF data. Doubtfully own work. Myrabella (talk) 23:26, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Эlcobbola talk 21:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is a copy of [5] but http://www.photo.renova.ru/ content is copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 23:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation Эlcobbola talk 21:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A third user added {{PD-old}} to this image.But we don't know how old it is nor who is its author. JuTa 23:41, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Source does not provide sufficient information to validate PD claim. COM:PRP and Commons:Essential information Эlcobbola talk 21:29, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing agreement is specifically not compatible with WMF projects: Copyright © 2012 NBCUniversal, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Permission is hereby granted for use of the photo herein depicting the NBCUniversal program solely for editorial purposes in newspapers and periodicals to promote the NBCUniversal program only and for no other purpose. " Qwyrxian (talk) 03:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by User:Fastily. Jujutacular (talk) 12:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should be deleted, because his owner is colocolo.cl http://www.colocolo.cl/2012/01/luca-pontigo/ 200.111.14.114 19:16, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by User:Hystrix. Jujutacular (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by R3nt3r (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons:Project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Reality006 (talk) 19:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Non-trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it seems not an own work Ezarateesteban 20:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File does not have a source at nativewiki, and appears likely to have been uploaded as fair use there. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims as "own work" but image has a commercial watermark. A look at other images uploaded by this editor shows a pattern of claiming apparent commercial images as own work. Dravecky (talk) 03:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful authorship - low resolution, no exif. Other user's contributions on theme en:Barrow Neurological Institute - copyvio. Art-top (talk) 04:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Przesłano nową, lepszą technicznie wersję tego samego zdjęcia.Zatem tę wersję proszę usunąć, aby nie dublować zdjęć. Dziękuję. Oldand53 (talk) 14:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was taken in 1973, and became public domain in Argentina in 1998 (25 years afterwards). It was not in public domain on the URAA date, so it is not free in the United States Cambalachero (talk) 20:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar to: File:04-06-2012Mapeamento_Heliopolis103.jpg, we have no reason to keep both. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 21:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image was marged with File:04-06-2012Mapeamento Heliopolis123.jpg, check the log. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 22:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar to File:04-06-2012Mapeamento Heliopolis109.jpg, we have no reason to keep both Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 22:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image very similar to File:04-06-2012Mapeamento Heliopolis110.jpg and have no reason to keep both Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image very close to File:04-06-2012Mapeamento Heliopolis117.jpg, and have no reason to keep both. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image very close to File:04-06-2012Mapeamento Heliopolis38.jpg, and have no reason to keep both. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 23:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not think this is behold the threshold of originality in its home country, the UK (see COM:TOO#United Kingdom) Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be free. If it is, the border and blurry stylization, and the overly-small size, make this unusable for a wiki article. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 01:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be free. If it is, the overly-small size makes this unusable for a wiki article. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 02:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted work Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted program Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted program Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing agreement is specifically not compatible with WMF projects: Copyright © 2012 NBCUniversal, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Permission is hereby granted for use of the photo herein depicting the NBCUniversal program solely for editorial purposes in newspapers and periodicals to promote the NBCUniversal program only and for no other purpose. " Qwyrxian (talk) 03:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims as "own work" but image is a trademarked commercial work. A look at other images uploaded by this editor shows a pattern of claiming apparent commercial images as own work. Dravecky (talk) 03:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official fraternity logo, without evidence of free license or PD status GrapedApe (talk) 05:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official fraternity logo, without evidence of free license or PD status GrapedApe (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official sorority logo, without evidence of free license or PD status. Was apparently lifted from myspace. GrapedApe (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:45, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong adress in the file name and bad quality, already upped a better one. Dies irae011 (talk) 06:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

The architect still living and there is no FoP in Italy Dega180 (talk) 09:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

The architect is dead in 1979, and there is no FoP in Italy Dega180 (talk) 09:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier image en cmjn a été remplacé Maurice Monnier (talk) 11:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:28, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not meet the criteria of Template:PD-ineligible. HaeB (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

On page 415-454 in this book there is a long chapter called Notes et éclaircissements written by Fernand Baldensperger, a French author who died in 1958. This book was first published in Paris, so the copyright of France (not public domain until 70 years after the author's death) is to apply. Therefore the mentioned pages have to be deleted, if this is technically impossible the whole file has to be deleted. --IusticiaBY (talk) 16:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Supposed copyright violation: this picture was published in Russian magazine "Shire krug", 2011, No. 6, page 34 (the issue can be downloaded here: http://www.shirekrug.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=31&&Itemid=61 ). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original photo from which this is derived from is unlikely to be the own work of the uploader as claimed. AFBorchert (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a google search is cited as source Anna reg (talk) 20:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Russia 88.64.119.61 20:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was taken in 1973, and became public domain in Argentina in 1998 (25 years afterwards). It was not in public domain on the URAA date, so it is not free in the United States Cambalachero (talk) 20:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was taken in 1973, and became public domain in Argentina in 1998 (25 years afterwards). It was not in public domain on the URAA date, so it is not free in the United States Cambalachero (talk) 20:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was taken in 1973, and became public domain in Argentina in 1998 (25 years afterwards). It was not in public domain on the URAA date, so it is not free in the United States Cambalachero (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work very doubtfull. Compare i.e. [6]. JuTa 21:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not believe the uploader is the photographer here. : See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harvey LEIBENSTEIN.jpg. I suspect some images from this uploader were copied from printed sources or various websites, without fully understanding the copyright licensing requirements. 84user (talk) 21:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original image is [7] copyrighted by its author Bayar Naranzul Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original image is from [8], but uploader declared it as own Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

real image source is [9] but this resource is copyrighted [10] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El bes (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep doesn't violate copyright more than File:Coca-Cola Glas mit Eis.jpg or thousands of similar photos. --Toot (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, Agree with nom, disagree strongly with Toot (I don't see that as comparable at all - there is a great difference between a trademark and a copyright). COM:DW, clearly including copyrighted work by other in image tagged as own work -- Infrogmation (talk) 06:35, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:VPC#Possible South Park copyvio (permanent link): the characters in this GIF file appear to be taken from a website, presumably this one. Stefan4 (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Carl's analysis at the VPC link above. --Avenue (talk) 17:16, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Infrogmation (talk) 06:39, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jan Kentink (talk) 20:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

something went wrong with the resizing 137.56.152.205 12:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 12:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also the derivative File:Allende,Cámpora,Dorticós 1973 (cropped).jpg

This photo was taken in 1973, and became public domain in Argentina in 1998 (25 years afterwards). It was not in public domain on the URAA date, so it is not free in the United States Cambalachero (talk) 20:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD in country of origin. Yann (talk) 12:51, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renominating. Per original nomination, this work was in copyright on the 1996 URAA date in Argentina, so its US copyright was restored until 2069. Yann's closure was improper and did not acknowledge the reason for deletion - works on Commons must be PD in the US. Dcoetzee (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original image is from [11] but imageban.ru is copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is a copy of [12] but this site content is copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jetijones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free logo Yann (talk) 06:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is OK: the stamp is certainly PD and the rest is just text. Yann (talk) 06:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete non free image, and is orphaned --‎Jetijonez Fire! 19:54, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't answer my point above. Yann (talk) 05:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the stamp is PD as shown here, and here. This image belongs to Tangiers Int'l. Furthermore the file is not in use in any article. --‎Jetijonez Fire! 18:14, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested. FASTILY (TALK) 01:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From what I can see, this was uploaded under the Italian equivalent of fair use: it:Bestand: Lucca-Stemma.png. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Dutch namespaces don't work on Italian Wikipedia. Correct link: it:File:Lucca-Stemma.png. Source claimed to be http://www.araldicacivica.it/ according to itwiki which appears to be CC-BY-NC-ND. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The butterfly is too complicated for {{PD-textlogo}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

G. Wildenbeest This is de only Logo this organisation has, I can't help there is a butterfly situated in.
Otherwise there is no symbolic recognition for this organisation and only text is present.
It's the official logo, so please keep this file.
8:16, 28 Juni 2012 (UTC)

G. Wildenbeest Type change from {{PD-textlogo}} to {{PD-ineligible}}. So butterfly is appropriated. Please keep this file. 9:31, 28 Juni 2012 (UTC)

  • (Tentative)  Delete Thank you for your reply. We do not keep copyrighted images on Commons unless they are freely licensed. That the organization doesn't have a freely-licensed version of their logo is regrettable, but that doesn't allow us to ignore copyright. As for the change to PD-ineligible, please specify why you believe the logo is ineligible. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 189.228.252.149 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Although it is not the same picture, check the angle [13]. There is no laws about PD-CCTV in Mexico Yann (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should we AGF here? Yann (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete AGF is about intention. The uploader may have cropped out a time stamp and believed, in good faith, that the resulting derivative was theirs to license. Considering the existence of this image and many similar, it seems reasonable to assume uploader found a CCTV image and uploaded it as their own. Delete per COM:PRP Эlcobbola talk 21:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:02, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: contains design elements, and no fair use Yann (talk) 06:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This looks very simple to me. Should be PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 06:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

: Keep - {{PD-textlogo}} --Sreejith K (talk) 06:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - The logo is from UK and so is copyrightable as per COM:TOO#UK --Sreejith K (talk) 06:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication the uploader has the rights to release this image under a free license. Based on the source of the image being "email", it;s unlikely there was any clear release given, and in any event would need to be clearly noted here. Whpq (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, a quick search shows the uploader works for an ad agency and this image is part of a PR project promoting the subject of the image. A quick review of the edit history supports the theory that the article is a poorly executed PR job. Barring written permission, these theories can not really sustain the image as "uploaded with permission". Has anyone contacted the uploader with instructions for communicating permission? 67.212.210.56 16:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An admin should check to see if this is just another upload of previously deleted file:PurpleRetta.jpg 67.212.210.56 17:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article on the English wikipedia which this image illustrates is up for deletion and will in all likelihood be deleted. -- Whpq (talk) 21:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy of previously deleted File:PurpleRetta.jpg .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in batch of blatant MSNBC-related copyvios (see File:NUP 148646 0003.jpg, File:NUP 136554 0015.JPG, File:LOCKUP.jpg,‎ File:Craig Melvin.jpg, File:NUP 150552 0819.jpg and File:Krystal Ball.jpg ). Technical quality (professional), subject, and uploader history suggest DUCK copyvio. Эlcobbola talk 17:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


  • MSNBC's Media Relations team has added this photo. The photo is property of NBCUniversal and can be found at http://www.nbcumv.com/mediavillage/networks/msnbc/. We understand that the rights of this photo will now be public domain. For questions please contact us at 212-664-6605. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cac5479 (talk • contribs)
    • The photos have been uploaded with a CC-by-SA 3.0 license, which contradicts "We understand that the rights of this photo will now be public domain" and, frankly, suggests a sloppiness one would not expect from a legitimate release by a legitimate representative. The impetus is on the uploader to provide sufficient licensing, not on us to call to obtain it. Please see Commons:OTRS and follow the instructions therein to provide the proper releases. Эlcobbola talk 18:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: All of the above, also the source site has a restrictive license, by no means PD. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is a copy of [14] but http://www.planetfear.com content is copyrighted Bogomolov.PL (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Нет вот от сюда - [15]. А тут он свободен. Gubin, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
    • Original image source is www.planetfear.com and this site content is copyrighted. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 10:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment. В описании написано "Фотография отредактирована и сделана мной самим". Здесь вы утверждаете, что файл взят из стороннего источника. Забавно. --Art-top (talk) 18:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not "own work" as claimed. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This graphical sign has been posted by an antidemocratic Organisation in Germany and aims at disturbing religios peace in Germany. It should therefor be immediately deleted. ArishG (talk) 17:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm the author of the german wp-articles pro NRW, pro Deutschland and Pro-Bewegung. The symbol is not prohibited and serves only the purpose of the documentation of this right-wing extremist organisations. --Bürgerlicher Humanist (talk) 17:16, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:58, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged no permission, strikes me as possible to be PD-Ineligible, as a word and a cube, but, sending it here to establish that and decide this case. (Used in eswiki, so in scope is free.) Courcelles (talk) 23:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-Ineligible}}. Wknight94 talk 03:48, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Loco085 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo with copyright Yann (talk) 05:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since the last DR was on this subject and the file was kept, a more detailed reason for proposing deletion would be nice. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the current trend, this file is probably too complex to be allowed here without a permission from the creator. Yann (talk) 09:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure about this one - a basic cube and plain text seems pretty simple to me. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 09:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept -FASTILY (TALK) 02:58, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt own work and I don't think that it is pd-textlogo. RE RILLKE Questions? 21:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Loco085 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo with copyright Yann (talk) 06:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since the last DR was on this subject and the file was kept, a more detailed reason for proposing deletion would be nice. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the current trend, this file is probably too complex to be allowed here without a permission from the creator. Yann (talk) 09:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think I agree about this one, too complex (given others I've seen at DR). --Philosopher Let us reason together. 09:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The logo is complex enough (although not so much) to be copyrighted. Fma12 (talk) 22:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted 02:58, 14 September 2012 by Fastily, closed by .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:38, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ralf Roletschek as Speedy (wir haben ausreichend Bilder von ihm, er wünscht die Löschung (ich auch) --Ralf Roleček 20:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)) Sreejith K (talk) 07:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was ist denn das für eine Diskussion? Jemand hat einen Artikel über ihn auf Tschechisch verfasst, nachdem ich selbst halber Tscheche bin, kann ich bestätigen, er ist sehr nett und wohlwollend geschrieben. Der soll doch froh sein, dass man überhaupt über ihn schreibt! Außerdem kann er als Fotograf das entsprechend gewünschte Bild wohl nachreichen! Was soll's................ — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.254.111.128 (talk)

Hallo Unbekannter, es geht wohl eher um die Löschung des Artikels in de-WP. Die ist für mich auch nicht im Geringsten nachvollziehbar. Nur sollte das kein Grund für "Trotzreaktionen" sein, die ich hier zumindest ein wenig vermute.

Deleted: 02:59, 14 September 2012 by Fastily, closed by .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dreamchaser50 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Set of test materials. Even if such kind of materials may be useful for Wikiversity, if should be in wiki-markup + SVG files.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Dreamchaser50 (talk · contribs)

Reuploaded after deletion.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unlikely to be useful in that form for any Wikimedia project. Not use. Also unclear origins of files.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, User warned --Denniss (talk) 09:36, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leovillaverde (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Leovillaverde

File:Musica e poesia e bailarina.JPG is composite of File:Musica e poesia.JPG (deleted as a copyvio) and File:Bailarina.JPG, itself nominated here. File:Bailarina.JPG has author metadata of "diegao", which is not "Leo Villaverde", apparently the uploader's name (see deleted contribs). Uploader has uploaded numerous copyvios (see, for example, File:Punk-kids-03 thumb thumb.jpg, File:23._Amor_na_natureza.jpg and deleted contribs). This pattern suggests File:Bailarina.JPG is not the uploader's work.

Эlcobbola talk 15:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted --Denniss (talk) 12:10, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Viktorin1988 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:45, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romelux c (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete anything that's even remotely suspicious. Instead of responding to this, the uploader decided to charge onwards unabated and upload another batch of blatant copyright violations – non-free Internet images from various sources. I was able to confirm the origin of all of them except File:325 life.jpg. That one should obviously be deleted as well, though. I've also added the sources of the copyvios above, where I was able to find them. The team photos are probably all taken from http://www.cdmarathon.com/web/el-club/historia/. LX (talk, contribs) 20:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, by Yann: Mass deletion of pages added by Romelux c. LX (talk, contribs) 10:01, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miquel Gimenez Olive (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Miquel Gimenez Olive (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Miquel Gimenez Olive (talk · contribs)

See above, the same problems. Two gaps in style and quality of photos taken in a single day in Spain and Russia.

Art-top (talk) 08:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious copyright claim FASTILY (TALK) 01:20, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glo1985 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims given the number of different cameras involved and the number of confirmed copyright violations.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations / no valid source given High Contrast (talk) 13:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

The preface on page 5-11 is written by Albert t'Serstevens, an French author who died in 1974. This book was first published in Paris, so the copyright of France (not public domain until 70 years after the author's death) is to apply. Therefore the mentioned pages have to be deleted, if this is technically impossible, the whole file has to be deleted. IusticiaBY (talk) 17:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file is from Bibliothèque nationale de France anyway. --Maltaper (talk) 09:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NS777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has uploaded numerous copyvios related to firearms/mendoz (see deleted contributions). These are all expected to be the same. For example, File:Ultimax_u100.jpg is here, File:Mendoza HM-3 de longitud Larga.jpg and File:Sub-metralleta Mendoza HM-3.jpg are here, etc.

Эlcobbola talk 18:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]