Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/05/26
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
No author given. No reason to believe he is already more than 70 years dead (like it is claimed in the copyright info tag). 2004 as date of production is given.- that is less than ten years ago. In addition the source is incomplete - isn't there a website where this image is from? If not: from which book is it? Saibo (Δ∇) 02:45, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- I fixed the tags, found the source, and added dates.--Canoe1967 (talk) 03:38, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, nice! I cannot find a date on the libraries page just "Copyright: Expired" is mentioned. And it is a photo (mentioned at source) so the creation date must be before death of the subject. --Saibo (Δ∇) 13:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Problem solved (see my cmt above) Saibo (Δ∇) 13:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image. out of scope russavia (talk) 06:10, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Source is given as facebook which makes this a copyright violation. Sreejith K (talk) 19:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Blank redirect Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Please use a speedy deletion tag next time .... Denniss (talk) 19:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
DALIBRI (talk) 10:40, 26 May 2012 (UTC) It should be a category, not a Page. Thank You very much. DALIBRI (talk) 10:40, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominator Sreejith K (talk) 19:24, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Seems to come from Facebook (per filename), unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:19, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Now found to be a crop of this copyrighted image File:BUE Campus.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:20, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=401913&id=106060039483362 Martin H. (talk) 20:45, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Anatomically incorrect (needs wings) Penyulap ☏ 15:48, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This particular bumblebee had his wings clipped in September 2011, so given that this image is post-September 2011, I believe that it is anatomically correct with no wings. russavia (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Makes sense to me so I have no objections either way. I'm just a little concerned other editors might mistake it for an attack image if it has no wings. Penyulap ☏
- Comment - I really would love to know how this is within scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:01, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- There is a widespread Russian meme of calling Medvedev a bumblebee (and portraying him as such). It appeared after his former fellow-student recalled that Medvedev stunningly sang Russian song "Мохнатый шмель" - "Shaggy Bumblebee" (based on Rudyard Kipling's "The Gypsy Trail") on their friend's wedding while dressed as Gypsy. Here are some publications (on Russian): [1] and some imagery (with and without wings): [2]. Free renditions of well-known political caricatures are withing scope. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Putin on the Ritz.jpg. --M5 (talk) 22:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Sure Matt, a search of Runet reveals all. Putin - krab; Medvedev - shmel; Lenin - grib is but one of the many memes to come out of Runet. So there's your scope. However, I wouldn't be opposed to someone overwriting my image with an improved version, coz my MS Paint skills ain't shit! ;) russavia (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well I'm in, slap together enough nonsense to look like it is the same size as a stubbish article and I'm at your service. I wouldn't be the craziest thing I've ever drawn, not even this month. Shall we say half a dozen bare url refs and more text than this deletion request finishes with ? Penyulap ☏ 23:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: *sighs* No reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
What is this? Kobac (talk) 13:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Answering your questipn see deletion request that was opened 4 days and closed three days ago. Tm (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oops, I didn't notice. Then close and keep. Kobac (talk) 00:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Done -mattbuck (Talk) 00:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oops, I didn't notice. Then close and keep. Kobac (talk) 00:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
old version Speckwanst (talk) 22:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader request, this is a faulty version. Ed (Edgar181) 12:10, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
old version Speckwanst (talk) 22:17, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader request, this is a faulty version. Ed (Edgar181) 12:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
mistake in structure Speckwanst (talk) 22:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uploader request, this is a faulty version. Ed (Edgar181) 12:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Decription Text: Illustration by ESA, adapted by Marcus Lindroos. No evidence is given that User:Picture Prince is the author and the given picture Date is wrong. Uwe W. (talk) 11:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Martin H. (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of scope russavia (talk) 06:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
hardly anything discernible. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 06:59, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused user uploaded personal image. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 07:17, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused exact duplicate + out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Promotional stuff with hardly any academic value. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 07:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused user's uploaded self-image Hindustanilanguage (talk) 07:41, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful if this file has any academic value or can be used on any Wiki Projects. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 07:46, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Appears a non-notable person from http://jaagruti.wordpress.com/about-me-you . The file nt used on any Wiki. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 07:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, no categories, etc Frédéric (talk) 16:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. Copyright status info was requested, but not given after a week. Apdency (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted by national Swedish broadcasting company SVT. Wolfgangus Mozart (talk) 23:08, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
According to vi:File:Sisowath_Sirik_Matak_09-01-1967.jpg, this file is copyrighted and non-free use content. Read also google-translated page aokomoriuta (talk) 07:11, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination High Contrast (talk) 19:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bukaj as Speedy (out of scope as we really have far than enough of it) Sreejith K (talk) 19:10, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Fry1989 eh? 21:21, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Didn't you forget something? --Saibo (Δ∇) 22:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Bukaj, please provide a selection of perfect replacements of "it" and explain why "it" is out of scope in your opinion. "It" is a quite important body part for us humans. --Saibo (Δ∇) 22:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, unique display of anatomical structure, within specific ethnic subset. Angular variation and unique coloration is interesting as well. -- Cirt (talk) 14:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - we have no images of the erections of black men which are at approximately 45 degrees from ground level with a slight angular tilt. Artistic blur on glans. --Claritas (talk) 20:59, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Quality is fine, no real reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bukaj as Speedy (out of scope as we really have far than enough of it) Sreejith K (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Bukaj, please provide a selection of perfect replacements of "it" and explain why "it" is out of scope in your opinion. "It" is a quite important body part for us humans. --Saibo (Δ∇) 22:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, unique for angular display and low-angle-shot of anatomical structure. -- Cirt (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - good contrast between penis and white vest. It looks like it's jumping out of the page at the viewer. --Claritas (talk) 21:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Quality is decent enough, keep per Claritas/Cirt. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:19, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Seems more like a screenshot than actual photograph. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:02, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
This is a non-descript image of an unknown location in Bahia de los Angeles and has been replaced. It is not used in any other article. Cdw1952 (talk) 03:31, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:57, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio? Edgars2007 (talk) 06:04, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
I do not wish to use it on Wiki Blubrys (talk) 13:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Too small resolution to use this picture somewhere, not used anywhere Motopark (talk) 19:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work. Text is copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work. Text is copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work. Text is copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan. en:Baku Crystal Hall is a recent building. Architect not yet dead for 50 years. Stefan4 (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Screencap from music video; it's under copyright. (And of course it cannot be used as fair use for group's page.) SKS2K6 (talk) 22:04, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 13:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused ... NobuTamura (talk) 04:40, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep - "Unused" is not a valid rationale for deletion. Many (probably most) images on Commons are not being used at any given moment. – JBarta (talk) 07:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep For the same reason Jbarta has given Citypeek (talk) 08:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 11:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused ... NobuTamura (talk) 04:41, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep - "Unused" is not a valid rationale for deletion. Many (probably most) images on Commons are not being used at any given moment. – JBarta (talk) 07:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep For the same reason Jbarta has given Citypeek (talk) 08:05, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 11:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused NobuTamura (talk) 04:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Deleting pictures because they are not used is not a valid reason. Citypeek (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 11:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused NobuTamura (talk) 04:43, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Deleting pictures because they are unused is not a valid reason. Citypeek (talk) 08:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 11:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
too many versions Soundie (Diskussion) 10:24, 8 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soundie (talk • contribs)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Highly doubt the uploader is the copyright holder. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:11, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
It's too dark Homealone1990 (talk) 03:19, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Looks like screenshot from TV or copyvio Edgars2007 (talk) 08:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
At http://www.zelfist.com/anasayfa/karsta-ilham-bulanlar/ (of 2010) the photographer is named as Tolga Türk. I suspect the uploader is not the photographer but only manipulated the EXIF data (date May 2012) to have his name in the author field. Martin H. (talk) 11:26, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Looks like a reprodcution photo of a poster (COM:L - permission from original photographer missing). Is it no poster but a photo of the real object?What is in the background? Saibo (Δ∇) 13:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Linea 4.png Teoamez (talk) 16:26, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Linea 5.png Teoamez (talk) 16:26, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Linea 6.png Teoamez (talk) 16:26, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Linea 7.png Teoamez (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Linea 8.png Teoamez (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Linea 9.png Teoamez (talk) 16:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Linea 10.png Teoamez (talk) 16:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Linea 11.png - Teoamez (talk) 16:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Linea 12.png - Teoamez (talk) 16:31, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Ramal.png - Teoamez (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Single cover art by singer Regina Spektor, the user doesnt own the copyright Ileana n (talk) 16:55, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:13, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Official promo photo, used (in slightly different versions) at [3] and [4]. Uploader has made highly dubious authorship claims on several other photos already. Regards, HaeB (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bukaj as Speedy (hardly usable due to low quality, without a meaningful description) Sreejith K (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A concern was brought up to me that this isn't an own work, based on the copyright notices at the bottom,. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:20, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Corrupt file. Sreejith K (talk) 19:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope personal picture Sreejith K (talk) 19:59, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
"Shanti-Mandir" is my home, my own office. Its 50 years old place ....heritage place which was built for Dr. D.G. Vinod...who is my father-in-law. He was world peace ambassador.
There is nothing offensive about this photograph.
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope image. Not enough information to be of use. Also, it is not clear whether the statue is in a public place or not, so as to evaluate it under FOP. Sreejith K (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work. Text is copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Yves Klein is not in public domain. Copyright violation. OxIxO (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Azerbaijan. Stefan4 (talk) 21:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Complex logo on the map. Stefan4 (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
The photo on the packaging is copyrightable and the logos are complex and unlikely de minimis, cf. case T 3440-08. Stefan4 (talk) 21:46, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:29, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
The photo on the packaging is copyrightable and the logos are complex and unlikely de minimis, cf. case T 3440-08. Stefan4 (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
The photo on the packaging is copyrightable and the logos are complex and unlikely de minimis, cf. case T 3440-08. Stefan4 (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Complex packaging. Stefan4 (talk) 21:48, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Complex packaging. Stefan4 (talk) 21:48, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Complex packaging with photo and logo. Stefan4 (talk) 21:49, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This file doesn't appear to be free. Ryan Vesey (talk) 22:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be a letter from Shirley Booth to Alan Light published as CC-BY 2.0 by the recepient of the mail. However, the copyright holder of a mail is normally the sender. Dubious if the recepient has received permission to publish this as CC-BY 2.0. Stefan4 (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
A better version is available here File:Metro Mad Linea 3.png Teoamez (talk) 16:24, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Bad GIF format superseded by a PNG. --V.Riullop (talk) 07:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 00:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
I do not believe this is an unaltered picture of Cabo. At best it is photoshopped but certainly is not a real view of Cabo 24.22.121.135 19:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep No evidence or policy cited in nomination. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:51, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep You have got to be be freakin' kidding me here... I was running all over the cruise ship as it was pulling into Cabo, taking shots literally every 10 seconds as the town was coming into view past the arch, and this was the best one of the bunch. So yes, this is exactly what it looks like! Stan Shebs (talk) 01:09, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Unjustifed deletion nomination by an anonIP with no other edits. Ww2censor (talk) 04:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 00:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
I checked the website and this file is not there and also it is "Copyright Vipassana Research Institute" User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Same painting, but in a bigger size and also different tinting. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio? Edgars2007 (talk) 05:56, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. I don't think, taht user Klavins123 is the author of the work (he put in caption (@ lv wiki) that this is picture of Virga in 1996 and it seems to me, that he was a very little kid then (I seems to me that he was born somewhere in beginning of 1990s). --Edgars2007 (talk) 06:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Not in use Adil Mansoori (talk) 09:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
because of transfer in other account Adil Mansoori (talk) 10:01, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: not a reason for deletion . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
False permission of Mozilla Public License. Zhxy 519 (talk) 14:01, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete:This image is a screenshot of www.people.com.cn, which said "Copyright © 1997-2012 by www.people.com.cn. all rights reserved" at the bottom of its page. It's not a free license work.--石 (talk) 11:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: If the permission was falsely stated, then let's correct it. CommInt'l (talk) 18:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- There is no correct permission for your work.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 17:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- In many ways I couldn't see this image is released under free license. You might claim that's a fair use in local wiki, or just quote the title in verbal form and giving out the source.--石 (talk) 07:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: Image clearly is copyrighted, with logos of People's Daily and its website interface. The only correction to the license you can do is the change it to a copyright tag, which will lead the image to its speedy deletion. --Wylve (talk) 19:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: 06:51, 12 August 2012 by Herbythyme, closed by . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
A photograph taken post-1921, with no specific date, is not public domain, as the picture may have been taken in 1924, and the author be still alive. 86.128.39.97 17:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Image was taken 70+ years ago! As you say you don`t know the date. As the memorial was built 1921, and a new photo op! don`t you think its highly likely this was taken in 1921!--Rockybiggs (talk) 11:29, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Photographer could easily have lived until 1942. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
no FOP in Turkmenistan Liliana-60 (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Who's the copyright holder? Just curious, --Amga (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The creator of the work or his heirs. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Phone card (?). Probably copyrightable. Stefan4 (talk) 21:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Then what about these cards? --Interfase (talk) 07:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP, see COM:FOP#Azerbaijan. The year 2005 on the sign indicates that it is recent. Stefan4 (talk) 21:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Russia is also not FOP. Then what about these? --Interfase (talk) 08:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- That is en:WP:OTHERTHINGSEXIST (is there no Commons version of that policy?) and there are probably lots of things which need to be deleted in the Moscow category. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Azerbaijan. en:Khojaly Genocide was in the 1990s. Stefan4 (talk) 21:19, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Russia is also not FOP. Then what about these? --Interfase (talk) 08:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Several deletion requests started, thanks. A problem with statues is that it is hard to find out when they were made, so it is difficult to know if they are PD or not. Presumably, there are more images which should be deleted, and I didn't have the time to check the whole category. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Azerbaijan. Stefan4 (talk) 21:23, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. France is also not FOP. Then what about these? --Interfase (talk) 08:51, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Some deletion requests started, thanks. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:24, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan. The man depicted was born in 1922 and he looks old, so it is unlikely that the sculptor died before 1949 (as required for {{PD-1996}}) or before 1962 (as required for {{PD-old-50}}). Stefan4 (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Russia is also not FOP. Then what about these? --Interfase (talk) 08:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Several deletion requests started, thanks. A problem with statues is that it is hard to find out when they were made, so it is difficult to know if they are PD or not. Presumably, there are more images which should be deleted, and I didn't have the time to check the whole category. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan. Stefan4 (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Russia is also not FOP. Then what about these? --Interfase (talk) 08:45, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Several deletion requests started, thanks. A problem with statues is that it is hard to find out when they were made, so it is difficult to know if they are PD or not. Presumably, there are more images which should be deleted, and I didn't have the time to check the whole category. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan. House built in 1985 according to en:JW Marriott Absheron Baku Hotel. Stefan4 (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Russia is also not FOP. Then what about these? --Interfase (talk) 08:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- A lot of the Moscow images should probably be deleted. Unfortunately, I don't know how to find the name or year of death of the architect for Russian buildings, so I can't tell which ones we should delete. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan. en:Baku Crystal Hall is a recent building. Architect not yet dead for 50 years. Stefan4 (talk) 21:36, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Russia is also not FOP. Then what about these? --Interfase (talk) 08:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- A lot of the Moscow images should probably be deleted. Unfortunately, I don't know how to find the name or year of death of the architect for Russian buildings, so I can't tell which ones we should delete. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:33, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan. en:Baku Crystal Hall is a recent building. Architect not yet dead for 50 years. Stefan4 (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
anon: It's a recent building, but there's a fair amount of controversy about it since it involved forcible denial of property rights in order to host Eurovision, which definitely is notable. Is it any good? No. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.114.10 (talk • contribs) 2012-06-07T14:06:31 (UTC)
I would like to assure you that the construction of Baku Crystal Hall was not connected with house demolition and evictions at all as it was built on the area of the former Soviet military base with no resident houses there. -- Gulustan 06:27, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Note that house demolition doesn't have anything to do with the copyright status of the building, so any house demolition is irrelevant. --Stefan4 (talk) 09:23, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:52, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harminder singh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be all taken from various external sources, mostly facebook, thus not own work. The leak of Metadata and the watermarks and different image qualities sustain this suspicion.
- File:Babbu Maan Live.jpg
- File:Babbu maan da chela.jpg
- File:Harminder singh 1994.jpg
- File:Harminder fan of babbu maan.jpg
- File:Babbu maan real hero of punjab.jpg
- File:Harminder singh fan of babbu maan.jpg
- File:Tejinder singh maan aka Babbu maan.jpg
- File:Harminder singh.Babbu maan follower.jpg
- File:Babbu maan at Launch Of ISPA Mumbai.jpg
- File:Babbu maan And DaVvy siNgh.jpg
- File:Babbu maan Harminder singh.jpg
RE rillke questions? 07:23, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP applies, and there is enough doubt that the files are authored by the uploader russavia (talk) 20:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oscaroyarzo (talk · contribs) that are declared as own work
[edit]I doutbt own work. Reason: Upload history, small sizes, no metadata. File:Buses del transantiago.jpg for example is taken from http://www.flickr.com/photos/empezardecero/5628965386/ (c)
- File:La Moneda Chile.jpg
- File:Metro neptuno.jpg
- File:Santiagoskyline.png
File:Parque O'Higgins.jpg- File:Santiago primavera.jpg
- File:Costanera y titanium.jpg
- File:Metro principe de gales.jpg
- File:Taxis de chile.jpg
- File:Buses del transantiago.jpg
- File:2012 chile, santiago.jpg
RE rillke questions? 08:23, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment File:Parque O'Higgins.jpg would be excluded from the list because it is a derivative work of a image licensed under a license compatible with Commons, which already has been noticed. Jespinos (talk) 18:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed & losslessly cropped -- RE rillke questions? 21:41, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 00:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
No author or author death date to confirm PD-OLD. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:56, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- I am the uploader and agree on the deletion. User:G.dallorto (talk) 09:17, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- I do not agree on deletion, as this is the only picture of Magnus Hirschfeld and it is completely impossible that the author of this picture is still alive. --McWien (talk) 22:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but he might have died less than 70 years ago. When I uploaded the image I did not know about this rule. Furthermore this is NOT the only image of him, there are several more. See the category, please. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 21:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- By the way, here is a derivate image from this one: File:Magnus Hirschfeld WHK1901.jpg
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)