Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2010/12/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
_(variant_1).jpg){kind=link}
_(variant_2).jpg){kind=link}
Also:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose / Uncategorized--Miguel Bugallo 15:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- 1 image kept. It is his personal choice if he wants to use it in his user page or delete it. The other 2 are out of scope and with a bad quality. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Fake Amodeep (talk) 11:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Comment I don't think that word means what you think it means.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete Copyright violation, I think its from the PC game Vampire - Bloodlines. Besides, out of scope --Yikrazuul (talk) 20:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)- Delete despite uninformative deletion request. Dubious sourcing; orphan with no in scope usefulness apparent. -- Infrogmation (talk) 06:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
naked picture Vinceyjing999 (talk) 16:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Nothing at all to do with the nudity but the watermark and copyright makes it speedy. Herby talk thyme 17:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copied from http://www.superbrasilia.com/sat/foto_taguatinga_5.htm Ednei amaral (talk) 03:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted / Copyvio--Fanghong (talk) 03:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Unuzed and uncategorized picture George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope--Fanghong (talk) 01:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio: [1] (scroll down), see [2] as well. It is dedicated to Rudi Gagel. Mathonius (talk) 12:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
![[2]](http://www.hermanvanveen.com/Herman-van-Veen/_documents/website/Afbeeldingen/Fotos/HighRes/HvV_RudiGagel02.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted / Copyvio--Fanghong (talk) 01:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Appears to be a hoax. Subject is identified as "Njabulo, runner-up of Swazi Idol 2009, claims to be son of Bobby Farrell", which is just plain silly. Jvhertum (talk) 12:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted / hoax--Fanghong (talk) 01:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Appears to be a hoax. Subject is identified as rapper Pharoahe Monch, which is false. Jvhertum (talk) 12:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted / hoax--Fanghong (talk) 01:59, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
the author didn't know the photo could be used commercially and doesn't accept it. Paname-IV (talk) 13:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploder request--Fanghong (talk) 01:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Insufficient information regarding permission. It's dedicated to Peter Thomsen on [3]. Mathonius (talk) 13:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted / Copyvio--Fanghong (talk) 01:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Copied from http://www.atribunamt.com.br/imagens-do-dia-23082007/?picture_id=10698 Ednei amaral (talk) 17:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted / Copyvio--Fanghong (talk) 02:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
The hands are too large. Anyway, there is better size diagram for Carnotaurus avilable. Conty (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploder request--Fanghong (talk) 02:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Copyright Adrian Wilson 2007, appears lifted from website. Google: ominous-Leeds-town-hall.jpg Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Speedy deletion, please. The Google search you suggested didn't work for me, but I found it at
- and
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/19485245@N00/1367896008/ (September 12, 2007)
- Clearly not the uploader's recent work.
- --InfantGorilla (talk) 14:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted /Copyvio--Fanghong (talk) 03:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
out of scope; not used anywhere :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. private photo, not in scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
unused, no cat, no encyclopedic value, useless Frédéric (talk) 10:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
unused photo of band with no notability as decided here fr:Ursüla - out of scope Santosga (talk) 14:59, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Santosga (talk) 15:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Santosga (talk) 15:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 18:01, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope, violating personal rights George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope, Advertising, no evidence of permission Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:30, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
unused logo of extinct business/website, no notability or article in fr or any other wiki project - out of scope Santosga (talk) 03:57, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
unused logo of extinct business/website, no notability or article in fr or any other wiki project - out of scope Santosga (talk) 03:57, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Copyright violation, no educational use Kenmayer (talk) 04:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Unclear source, no way to verify license. Kelly (talk) 06:46, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- It's an etching from an 1882 German Bible. That should be reasonable old enough for expired licence. --Finn Bjørklid (talk) 09:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- To compare, we do have SamsonDestroyTemple.jpg which is from 1890, and obvously a less artistic and more kitich drawing based upon the original from the German Bibel. Here is a source for Samson.gif. --Finn Bjørklid (talk) 10:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Here is some additional info on the source.[4] Kelly (talk) 20:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by Applescruffs (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope content, probably copyvio. Rastrojo (D•ES) 01:29, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Unofficial, unused, copyrighted sport logo. 99kerob (talk) 19:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Probable hoax. No evidence that user works for Nickelodeon, first of all, and I doubt they'd release a logo under Creative Commons. TenPoundHammer (talk) 21:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete It's definitely a hoax. JDDJS (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
I agree with JDDJS,its a hoax,it should be deleted right away! 744cody (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Looks like someone copypasted the Nickelodeon logo above a Microsoft Paint creation. Alas, I don't think Wikimedia has a "speedy delete" option. Erpert (talk) 18:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
no description - useless Reinhardhauke (talk) 22:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Isabella of France cropped from File:Isabela karel4.jpg -- Common Good (talk) 21:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
=== File:Thisone.JPG ===
Non-free screenshot of Windows, protected by Microsoft ? Marek M (talk) 14:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, Rehman 00:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Invalid source --Miguel Bugallo 15:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 02:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Copied from http://mochileiro.tur.br/varzea-grande.htm Ednei amaral (talk) 22:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Pruneautalk 17:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Copied from http://mochileiro.tur.br/varzea-grande.htm Ednei amaral (talk) 22:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Pruneautalk 17:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Copied from http://mochileiro.tur.br/varzea-grande.htm Ednei amaral (talk) 22:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Pruneautalk 17:52, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Images copied from http://mochileiro.tur.br/varzea-grande.htm Ednei amaral (talk) 22:17, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Pruneautalk 17:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Copied from http://www.google.com.br/imgres?imgurl=http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9m1YIOA-vHk/TQs2o31dljI/AAAAAAAAABo/utNtUtn0ZQQ/S1600-R/primavera%252Bdo%252Bleste.jpg&imgrefurl=http://abraespanha.blogspot.com/2010/12/tema-da-semanadomingo-na-pista.html&usg=___Ia3QxlqHDdwPRLtVcSKUEkMgT0=&h=332&w=500&sz=33&hl=pt-br&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=ImTco90CU2lxrM:&tbnh=126&tbnw=173&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522primavera%2Bdo%2Bleste%2522%2Bnoite%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dpt-br%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1250%26bih%3D839%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=117&vpy=227&dur=1035&hovh=183&hovw=276&tx=110&ty=81&ei=MlYeTZDsA4H7lwe00KzWCw&oei=MlYeTZDsA4H7lwe00KzWCw&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=30&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:0 Ednei amaral (talk) 22:16, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 00:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Copied from http://mochileiro.tur.br/cuiaba.htm Ednei amaral (talk) 22:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 00:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
low quality image, we have better replacements, such as File:London Genral B Type bus LA 9928.jpg Ultra7 (talk) 01:46, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- If that's the case, why not keep only one or two good quality pics of famous landmarks. There are tons of imgs of the same item in commons. One cannot simply delete a pic due to poor quality. Plus this pic is taken with a K800i mobile phone. This should at least count as something. --Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 04:32, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Its no valid reason to delete an image because we have another, better one. --Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 17:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
If it's not a valid reason, then please wait for someone else to say so, rather than closing this yourself. Ultra7 (talk) 14:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- And it is a valid reason actually, to quote the deletion policy: "Redundant or low quality files only get deleted on a case by case basis after they are listed at Commons:Deletion requests. At deletion requests you will need to provide reasons why a particular file is inferior to the alternative version". I've provided the reason - this image is poor, not a single part of it is in focus, and we have several better replacements of the exact same bus that are, so there is no point retaining it on Commons. You, as the uploader simply disagreeing, is not considering the image on a 'case by case basis'. Ultra7 (talk) 14:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- And I don't know why I was reverted in undoing the above improper closure, but this is not a second nomination. Ultra7 (talk) 17:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- I was copy and pasted the reason of a similiarly closed image. --Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 05:46, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep Image in use. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 01:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept, in use, therefore in scope. Blurpeace 02:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Poor image, adequate replacements, not in use Ultra7 (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept. It is in use on two different projects. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 16:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Publicity photo and clearly flickr-washing. The image description on Flickr says "Press photo, Nov 2010. credit: AP-imaging.com". Chaser (talk) 20:29, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, the Flickr uploader lists it as copyright (all rights reserved). Anyway, clearly a copyvio.--Chaser (talk) 20:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Heya. This photo was taken by a friend, Andrea Coan, who is the wife of the drummer of the band in this photo. She only had it posted on her Facebook, and there was no way to set licensing to an image from Facebook. Let me know what needs to be done to keep the image here and I'll take care of it. =] Cheers! --Polarizeme (talk) 20:54, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- I see now the Flickr license has been changed and that you have the same username. Sorry I missed that before. In any case, follow the instructions at Commons:Email templates, making appropriate substitutions, and email the photographer to get her permission. She must not have sold the copyright of the photo to anyone else in order to be able to relicense the photo to us. In other words, she must still own the photo.--Chaser (talk) 22:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Will do. Cheers for the info! --98.213.83.113 18:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Permission received added to the image page. -- Taketa (talk) 10:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Permission received. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 18:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
screenshot of Windows Marek M (talk) 11:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
screenshot of Windows Marek M (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
The composer of this song died in 1965. According to Copyright Law of South Korea, Article 39, protection is applied for 50 years after copyright holder's death. – Kwj2772 (msg) 15:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Maybe, this is Copyvio. --Idh0854 (talk) 11:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Low-res image from Flickr, no camera info for this image, both source images not at this Flickr account Denniss (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Uploader asserts source is a dvd, disproves "own work". Non-free images out-of-scope on commons DMacks (talk) 19:04, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete source seems to be a dvd. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:40, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Photograph of copyright poster. In UK, no FOP for 2-d "graphic works" - and this is certainly one. Seidenstud (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- So UK law is that if you photograph a sculpture, which the sculptor might reaonably object to, that is OK, but if you photograph a noticeboard, which the copyright holder would not object to as its intention is just to convey information which they want to disseminate, that is a breach of copyright. It seems absurd, but if that is the law, it is. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete it is the law. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Photograph of copyright poster. In UK, no FOP for 2-d "graphic works" - and this is certainly one. Seidenstud (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Masur (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
I do not see, given the source, how we can be sure this is PD in Greece. there is no way to know when the author died. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:04, 31 December 2010 (UTC) Adding:
Same issue. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. - given the dates the subjects died, we need more information to know if they're PD-old - Jcb (talk) 12:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
This is not just text so I'm starting this DR to get an evaluation: is this {{PD-ineligible}}? It is fair use on en-wiki. MGA73 (talk) 00:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept. - I would say PD-textlogo, although this is almost a borderline case - Jcb (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - not out of scope, see here - Jcb (talk) 14:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Kept per the evidence noted by Jcb. Logos not inherently out of scope, they're usually just not free. Steven Walling 02:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Derivative of the UC Irvine anteater logo. No assertion that the logo is freely licensed. GrapedApe (talk) 00:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed it. Evrik (talk) 01:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Now it's just a black blade. Is that an alternate blade style? If not, then it's mislabeled and improperly used on the UC Irvine Anteaters wikipedia page. Also, I'm not sure that just uploading a new version totally fixes the copyright problem, since there are 4 previous versions with the copyvio. Maybe I'm missing something here.--GrapedApe (talk) 01:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. - I could have deleted the previous versions to fix the copyright issue, but the current version was just useless - Jcb (talk) 14:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Images from Protein Data Bank
[edit]It appears from this search that Commons contains almost 500 images sourced to the Protein Data Bank. The terms for that site can be found here, and as noted at Commons talk:Licensing, the first provision of the terms specifically prohibits derivative works. Kelly (talk) 02:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not quite, it only prohibits derivative works if distributed using the exact same filenames. I think that restriction is OK (tantamount to requiring modifiers to identify changes, which is fine in free licenses). Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Probably keep. I don't see the restriction as a reason to delete. It's all the effect of PDB's policy-level protection of its file naming style, rather than something intended to restrict use of the files. You could consider it like trademark restrictions on a textlogo; you can modify it but you can't present a modified version as the accurate logo. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 15:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:1axc tricolor.png. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:41, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. - also the DR is invalid, because all files must be listed in the DR, uploader(s) must be notified and all files must contain the nomination as well - Jcb (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
_(variant_1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(variant_1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fantastic image Kwasura (talk) 03:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
_(variant_1).jpg){kind=link}
- Delete out of scope. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:44, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
_(variant_1).jpg){kind=link}
_(variant_1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
If one looks "carefully" at this, they will see that the wolf image has been copy pasted from somewhere and has not been sourced; it is not PD ZK-002 (talk) 07:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete It is all wrong from the beginning. This "roundel" have nothing to do with the real one. Don't know why it is still kept, despite the votes of over users. We have to inform, not to misinform people. --Kwasura (talk) 12:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - apparently the reason in the previous DR was meant to be 'fantasy image' rather than 'fantastic (=great) image'. So you may ignore my 2011 closure. Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Alan (talk) 00:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
_(variant_2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(variant_2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fantastic image Kwasura (talk) 03:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
_(variant_2).jpg){kind=link}
- Delete out of scope. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:45, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep in use, thereby in scope. MKFI (talk) 16:40, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
_(variant_2).jpg){kind=link}
I do not want my picture on Wikipedia anymore 68.174.127.36 07:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
I do not want my picture on Wikipedia anymore Vavavoom (talk) 07:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader requested--Fanghong (talk) 01:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
I'm honestly not sure if this diagram qualifies for PD-ineligible, in which case the photo would fail to be free under UK FOP rules. The diagram is a map of the various railway lines going through Stratford International station. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:20, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I cannot see this as an artistic or litterary work. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. - it just contains information - Jcb (talk) 14:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
very poor resolution logo of Category:Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, could be replaced by File:USAC.gif in its only usage in a custom userbox Santosga (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 15:01, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The licensing info is obviously false. The subject was born in 1964 and he would have been 16 years old in 1980. The image shows a man in his 40s. Likely copyvio. Nsk92 (talk) 14:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, that's right. but if you see in his shirt, you see the name of UCLA club that ghotbi enjoyed it in 1980 or 1981.What's ur name? (talk) 15:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Sockpuppet upload by someone who is obviously not carying about copyrights but claiming any image he grabbed to 1980. Also no source given that establishes the licensing status (copyright in photographs and movies lasts 30 years from the date of publication - quoting a publication is therefore required). --Martin H. (talk) 16:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
The same image that has been deleted several times before after being uploaded by a sock, see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archives/User problems 16#Cross-wiki sockpuppeteer and en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amir.Hossein.7055. Obviously bogus licensing info: the subject was born in 1964, but the image shows a man in his 40s, not a 16 year old. Nsk92 (talk) 16:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted (Again). --Martin H. (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Porn. 84.61.173.207 14:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy kept, useful anatomical illustration in use in multiple projects. Commons is not censored; mere nudity is not pornography. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Porn. 84.61.173.207 14:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Speedy kept, please. Luispihormiguero Any problem? 14:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy kept, abusive repeat identical deletion requests from anon -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Porn. 84.61.161.125 12:33, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- No. No it isn't. Keep reccomend speedy (someone else's turn to close this one). -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- As above. It is not porn. It is encyclopedic illustration showing scrotum. Keep Mappy (talk) 12:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy kept - Per above –Krinkletalk 04:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely to by own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Discussion obsolete, no more use of these copyrighted pictures Vavavoom (talk) 17:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- You may clear the content by yourself.The page should be exist.
Discussion obsolete Vavavoom (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - you can archive the discussion if you want. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Masur (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Edited picture only to hide identity; which can also be done by just not adding it and lowering the loads on servers. Burhan Ahmed (talk) 17:30, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Keep. That doesn't appear to be a valid deletion reason. It's not like it's a GIF image. That could also be helpful in, like, a article. Mr. Berty! talk/stalk 08:03, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
What is the reason of deletion of this image, perhaps you Burhan Ahmed have some mis understandings with me. What is problem with you? I means you are jealousy by me for what you are tagging deletion tags on my all files. If you have any problem with me then tell me here I will tell you. Are you understand ? --Just Feel It (talk) 11:15, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 17:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Uploader (Wistula / Mark Nikolaus von Nathusius) is not the author of the picture. He only made the scan. See User_talk:Wistula#Urheber_.2B_Todesdatum_unbekannt. Author unknown, date of creation was about 1942, so that PD-old or PD-Anonymous can both not be applied. -- Martina Nolte (talk) 19:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- @Sysop: Before deleting: pls have a look at this disc, I do not have time to react on all those mass deletion requests seperatly. In case, you are a German speaker, pls have a look here too rgds --Wistula (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. - not enough information to keep it - Jcb (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Original file at en Wikipedia had no given source. Kelly (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep originally uploaded in 2004. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 17:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
This is a logo of a government agency from Italy and there is no way it can be freely licensed. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept. - PD-textlogo - Jcb (talk) 17:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The image is on Flickr with this license and the eponymous Flickr account is almost certainly associated with the actual campaign. But we'd need an email permission to know for sure. It's far easier just to upload this as fair use on the English Wikipedia (which I've done) and not waste our time confirming permission for a logo. It's only current use is on the English Wikipedia article. Chaser (talk) 20:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - {{PD-textlogo}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, that's probably true. I guess the differing font size does not qualify as creative expression?--Chaser (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - ineligible for copyright. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. - PD-textlogo - Jcb (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Source image at en Wikipedia had no evidence of permission. Kelly (talk) 20:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep the underlying map is the same as that of File:Map of USA highlighting Virginia.png etcetera. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
At least 1 image copied from http://mochileiro.tur.br/rondonopolis.htm Ednei amaral (talk) 22:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 12:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Copied from http://mochileiro.tur.br/sinop.htm Ednei amaral (talk) 22:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 12:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
see w:File:Hagenpatent1964.png. We do not have enough source image to know if this is a copyrighted image or if it was pd-pre1978 or pd-not renewed Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:34, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 17:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Copied from http://www.oschicos.com.br/blog/?p=511 Ednei amaral (talk) 23:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - uploader's other contributions are also suspicious. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 12:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
