Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/10/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Copyright violation of Wikipedia logo -Eduloqui (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, not used anywhere, there are enough mainpage screenshots at Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 23:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
As already mentioned on Image_talk:Bangladesh-army.jpg, this maybe is a copyright violation. Please check. • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) wtf? • 01:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Possible Copyvio Sterkebaktalk 15:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Questionable copyright. All uploads from editor have questionable copyright. --RichN (talk) 02:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Questionable copyright. All uploads from editor have questionable copyright. --RichN (talk) 02:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Questionable copyright. All uploads from editor have questionable copyright. --RichN (talk) 02:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Questionable copyright. All uploads from editor have questionable copyright. --RichN (talk) 02:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Questionable copyright. All uploads from editor have questionable copyright. --RichN (talk) 02:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 13:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Questionable copyright. All uploads from editor have questionable copyright. --RichN (talk) 03:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, coypvio, higher resolutions are here and here. --Martin H. (talk) 14:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Questionable copyright. All uploads from editor have questionable copyright. --RichN (talk) 03:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, not only questionable, the image is watermarked with INFOCOCHES.COM. --Martin H. (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Going by Babelfish, the third paragraph of http://www.asianfeast.org/copyright.htm appears to be a non-commercial license. dave pape (talk) 03:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. They're ceding all their own images and text from the website, but don't (and probably can't) cede rights to other photos they are hosting. This appears to be one of the latter. So delete.--Chaser (talk) 05:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Questionable copyright. All uploads from editor have questionable copyright. --RichN (talk) 03:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, copyvio maybe from this website. --Martin H. (talk) 14:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
duplicado Angel Casusol (talk) 06:17, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Next time please use {{Duplicate|other file}} and always name the other file. Cecil (talk) 06:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
vandalism image, error image. see zh:Wikipedia:当前的破坏/Tp61i6m42008, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Tp61i6m42008.jpg --shizhao (talk) 07:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete Unused & pretty useless. --Simonxag (talk) 11:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 14:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Copyright violation (While the image is a derivative work from my works without approval) K.Y.Chung (talk) 07:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment Do we have any evidence? --Simonxag (talk) 11:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment I can show those original works by me. They were put on my personal website many years ago. K.Y.Chung
Comment What is your URL? --Jackl (talk) 09:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment Here they are:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4] K.Y.Chung
![[1]](http://rail.kychung.com/old_material/mtr_ael_emu_large.gif){kind=link}
![[2]](http://rail.kychung.com/old_material/mtr_tcl_emu_large.gif){kind=link}
![[3]](http://rail.kychung.com/old_material/mtr_url_emu_large.png){kind=link}
![[4]](http://rail.kychung.com/old_material/mtr_url_new_emu_large.png){kind=link}
Comment The old M-train said that it's going to Sheung Wan instead of Central at your website. ---Jackl (talk) 07:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment They are obviously a derivative work from my works in spite of those little modifications. I don't think it is a kind of copyright violation only if they are identical. K.Y.Chung
Delete These sort of drawings are bound to have some things in common but they do look awfully similar. --Simonxag (talk) 21:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Copyright violation (While the image is a derivative work from my works without approval) K.Y.Chung (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Source website specifies non-commercial, no-derivative. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
as of COM:SCOPE. Even if Greg Garbowsky would be a famous Minigolf player (is he?), that image wouldn't be of use. Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Vanity image outside of project scope (see also w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Shasmir). Also Image:Matias.jpg. MER-C 10:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- It is actually used on the :en-userpage of the uploader; I've tagged it therefore as upi.--Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy keep It's the user's own picture of himself which is in use on his userpage on the Wikipedia. --Simonxag (talk) 10:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete Normally I would agree with Simonxag, but in this case the user have edited in the last two years only his user page at en.wiki, no edits in the article namespace. So I say "delete". --GeorgHH • talk 13:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment This user page is up for deletion. If it did get deleted then I'd agree with deleting the image. --Simonxag (talk) 10:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, out of scope. --Martin H. (talk) 03:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
per Commons:Derivative works. Artist born in 1941. Artwork located in the USA. Teofilo (talk) 12:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
per Commons:Derivative works. Artist born in 1941. Artwork located in the USA. Teofilo (talk) 12:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Self promotional image with long article, no notability. Martin H. (talk) 12:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
not used personal image, out of scope. Martin H. (talk) 12:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. --GeorgHH • talk 13:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
deleted Julo (talk) 18:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Author asked me to take this photo offline --Pn18 (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Why? — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Keep Commons licenses are not revocable and the image has been here far too long for it's licensing to be a mistake. We should be reasonable and consider any arguments put forward for deletion - but only if there are any. --Simonxag (talk) 19:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Kept. No arguments have been presented. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
per Commons:Derivative works. Artist born in 1941. Artwork located in the USA. Teofilo (talk) 13:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
The robots seem to be moving, while people are watching. Therefore not "permanently located". COM:FOP#United Kingdom does not apply, then. Teofilo (talk) 13:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- And that matters because...? // Liftarn (talk) 17:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Because these robots are parts of a television series, copyrighted by its author(s). Teofilo (talk) 17:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
« shown at Doctor Who exhibition » sounds like a temporary exhibition, not a permanent one. Therefore this is not "permanently located" and COM:FOP#United Kingdom does not apply Teofilo (talk) 13:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- The temporary nature of the exhibition is confirmed by "Earls Court now extended to the 9th November due to popular demand! Don't miss it. " according to http://www.doctorwhoexhibition.com/earls.html Teofilo (talk) 13:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Non-free image, derivative photograph of what is evidently a copyrighted statue. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Gernot Keller:
This and few more pictures were taken at the Dr. Who Exhibition few weeks ago in Earls Court. It was encouraged to take pictures there. Whoever requests deletion of that picture needs to contact me directly and proove to be legally authorized deleting this image.
- Okay, point taken. Now, this is interesting, and I'd ask people with more knowledge of copyright to comment: if the copyright owner of a piece of 3D artwork gives the public permission to make photographs, does that automatically mean the resulting photographs are totally within the copyright of the people who took them, or is there a remnant of implicitly reserved rights still with the original author, such as controlling publication? If this is okay, I'll apologise and retract this nomination. These are of course fine images (really, kudos for the brilliant photography!), and it would be quite interesting for en-wiki, as it might make a whole bunch of non-free screenshots replaceable. I've written to the exhibition organisers to get a clarification from them if they reserve any rights on publication. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Update: I received a reply from the organisers (info at doctorwhoexhibitions dot com). They say: "Photography is not encouraged as such but is allowed [...] however it is only on the condition that they are strictly for personal use. [...] There is no liscense given to members of the public to distribute there personal media of the exhibitions." That's really a pity, because those were wonderful photographs and would have been extremely useful, but the message seems pretty clear. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep- Humpphhh. Copyright law never ceases to provide new surprises. :-) I'll gladly defer to your expertise here. But were those things on "permanent" display? I thought those exhibitions were temporary? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hurm, I may have misread "if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public" to be [in pseudo-code] "(permanently situated in a public place || in premises open to the public)" when it appears it's more likely "permanently situated (in a public place || in premises open to the public)". That sucks. howcheng {chat} 20:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Humpphhh. Copyright law never ceases to provide new surprises. :-) I'll gladly defer to your expertise here. But were those things on "permanent" display? I thought those exhibitions were temporary? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 01:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete anyway, the picture can be undeleted in case a positive answer is given by the copyright holder (That must be "Dr Who"'s copyright holder, probably its producer, the BBC itself ?) . Teofilo (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. UK law has: "permanently situated (in a public place || in premises open to the public)"MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Derivative work of contemporary artwork shown in a temporary exhibition, United Kingdom Teofilo (talk) 14:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Derivative work. The circumstances of the original work (old enough to be PD ?) are unknown Teofilo (talk) 14:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Doesn't look old enough to be PD. MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Is this image now from 1987 oder form 1885? GFDL and CC is anyway the wrong license. ~/w /Talk 14:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
The image is from 1885, what licence should I give? It was copied in 1987.Karel leermans (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
I will put PD art.Karel leermans (talk) 11:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
In fact I cannot put PD art, could yould do it? Karel leermans (talk) 11:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Kept. OK now. MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:59, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This image is not created today. I don't think it's appropiate tagged too ~/w /Talk 15:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- One of the people shown on the picture must be "Louis Löschner", as reported in the "description" field. But who is the other one ? Is this "Louis Löschner" the same person as the uploader, whose user name is "Onkel Louis" ? If it is so, who is the photographer then ? Or was a delayed action shutter used ? Many mysteries surround that picture. Teofilo (talk) 17:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. No valid source. Not "own work". MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't think this kind of image is allouwd Sterkebaktalk 15:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted - focus is clearly the unfree logo. Hence a derivative work. |EPO| da: 15:46, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Questionable copyright. Date on copyright tag was 13.10.2008. (user has since changed it to date reflected in the image title) Reinhold died in the 1990s so his image could hardly been taken today. It likely wouldn't be PD if it was taken in 1941 , as the image title suggests, anyway. (UTC)--Paloma Walker (talk) 15:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Not own work. No other source given. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Nice girl.. But in the scope? Sterkebaktalk 16:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
A photograph of a sculpture in ARoS Museum of Art in Århus, Denmark. However, the artist is still alive, so the sculpture is protected by copyright, and freedom of panorama in Denmark unfortunately only extends to buildings. Hemmingsen (talk) 17:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
private photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 17:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Keep Potentially useful. The slogan could be cropped off or replaced for example. --Simonxag (talk) 16:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Personal image. No doubt it could be cropped, but it hasn't been, and as it stands the image is out of scope. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
out of project scope as biography Anonymous101 talk 17:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
out of Scope 84.87.184.247 17:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - it's used on 13 pages over 4 projects, so it's obviously in scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Kept. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Wrong upload - have already uploaded Image:DirkvdM Artis-Aqarium zuid 03.png , which does work. DirkvdM (talk) 18:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Used only in a hoax article at cs wikipedia. Miraceti (talk) 18:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, per nomination. --Martin H. (talk) 23:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned personal image. OsamaK 19:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 23:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned personal image. OsamaK 19:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 16:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Outside project scope. -Nard the Bard 21:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Closed: already deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Image appears to be copyvio as a photo from 1957 or 1958 when the volcano last erupted, no evidence of rights to original User:Doug(talk • contribs) 22:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Capelinhos_eruption1.jpg, also note the uploader's page, apparently he or she uploads lots of copyvio works for use on French Wikipedia.--User:Doug(talk • contribs) 22:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Fails Flickr review, anyway. MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
not public domain Varel (talk) 14:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by SterkeBak: Copyright violation: Publication: Rob Hume, Ptáci evropy, str. 213
Out of our scope: Cant find any notability here, the personal image is not used anywhere. Martin H. (talk) 12:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Still unused. Also the permission by Leo Faria is missing. Cecil (talk) 02:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Copyright http://fichas.infojardin.com/arboles/abies-cephalonica-abeto-griego.htm MPF (talk) 13:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by MPF: Copyright violation: © http://fichas.infojardin.com/arboles/abies-cephalonica-abeto-griego.htm
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This is a duplicate image. The correct image is locted at USCG Sector Fild Office Eastern Shore 01.jpg. --FieldMarine (talk) 02:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted as this is an unused duplicate of File:USCG Sector Field Office Eastern Shore 01.jpg. Please use the {{Badname}} template for such misnamed uploads instead of the regular deletion process. Thanks. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
If the photo is from the end of the 1950s, and PD-Ukraine stipulates it had to be published before 1951, obviously this is a copyright infringement russavia (talk) 05:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I've uploaded this image long ago as PS-Soviet (when it was valid). I' dont't know who have put PD-Ukraine tag, it is obviously unvalid in this case. Kneiphof (talk) 16:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per Kneiphof. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Bingemer died in 1955, that's not 70 years ago. The same Problem [Image:Zhg40 bingemer skizze2.jpg] see http://www.stadtgeschichte-ffm.de/abteilungen/abteilung_3/03603inhalt.html Haselburg-müller (talk) 08:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Bingemer drew these two sketches (see also Image:Zhg40_bingemer_skizze_2.jpg) in the year 1917 - these scetches have been published several times among other things in the local history museum of Frankfurt - Bergen-Enkheim: Henschke, Werner: Die Schelme von Bergen in Sage, Geschichte und Dichtung. Herausgegeben mit freundlicher Unterstützung der Frankfurter Sparkasse von 1822 (Polytechnische Gesellschaft), Frankfurt 1979. The pictures come from the LAGIS-Server of the University of Marburg Hessian from the office of a federal state for historical regional studies. (http://cgi-host.uni-marburg.de/~hlgl/plaene/st.cgi?ex=xs&lines=10&art=kartenskizze¤t=10&details=1&id=zhg40_bingemer_skizze2 and http://cgi-host.uni-marburg.de/~hlgl/plaene/st.cgi?ex=xs&lines=10&art=kartenskizze¤t=10&details=1&id=zhg40_bingemer_skizze1). This nationalhistorical information system of the country Hessen has the task to compile bases to the history of Hessen of the beginning of the Middle Ages into the present and furnishes various scientific services to historical regional studies in Hessen. It was not well-known by me that the author died at 1955 - actual this work is 91 years old (1917). These images can show the surroundings of Frankfurt-Bergen in former times - Image:Zhg40_bingemer_skizze_2.jpg displays the roman roads and historical ways near Frankfurt-Bergen and is a great help for useful information to the local history. For this reason I please to reject the delete request - Thank you! --Virus11 (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your further evidence about copyright violations. None of these publications is older than 100 years, copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years does not match because of his death in 1955, actually 53 years ago.--Haselburg-müller (talk) 17:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per Haselburg-müller (thanks for the research!). --AFBorchert (talk) 19:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
no source specified, user has a history of copyright violations at en.wiki and all his other uploads as well as at least one article he copy/pasted have been deleted 66.31.42.26 02:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Looks to me like the source is specified. The image was originally uploaded by Wikipedia user Dbro257. In the description for the image, it is stated that one of the men depicted is Lieutenant Douglas Brown, and the image is further stated in the edit comments to be part of the collection of the uploader, explaining that Dbro257 is Douglas Brown. I am prepared to believe that he is the copyright holder or otherwise has the right to post it here. (How do you know his camera wasn't on a timer?) Furthermore, it is rather pointless to try to contact Dbro257 on Wikipedia for further explanations if any are needed, because he hasn't edited a page since 2007. Far better to track him down and email him directly, though apparently he is no longer with the Clinton Township Fire Department in Columbus, Ohio. But the other man (other than Oliver North) in the picture-- Fire Chief John Harris-- is still with the Fire Department, one could email him [5] and ask for further information on the source of the picture if one feels it is lacking. Incidentally, I see nothing in Dbro257's list of user contributions to suggest a history of copyright violation. What I do see is a list of deleted images that he very likely took himself (from the filenames they were pictures of fires and people and structures in his town) but didn't understand how to tag correctly. 68.251.61.102 06:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- I checked the user's record on EN.WP. It appears that when his images were deleted it was not for copyright violations. In at least one case a WP image was deleted simply because it had been copied here.Image:Eberlyta.jpg. Perhaps the nominator could present clearer evidence of previsou problems. Will Beback (talk) 20:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Content at enwiki was "Oliver North pictured with Clinton Township, Franklin County, Ohio Assistant Fire Chief John Harris and Lieutenant Douglas Brown at public speaking event.;{{GFDL-self-with-disclaimers}}. --Maxim(talk) 19:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Kept per 68.251.61.102. Maxim, thank you for checking the original description at en-wp. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
per Commons:Derivative works. This is apparently a photography of 3-dimensional artworks. 3D artist unknown Teofilo (talk) 12:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Imho it s not en:CGI, but it s clearly a furniture designer artwork and this request is legit. Greudin (talk) 18:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per Teofilo and Greudin. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope, used on an Usertalkpage in en.wp only: w:en:User talk:Peppersunlimited Martin H. (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete --GeorgHH • talk 13:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted as this image is used not on a regular user talk page but one which is used for advertising only. This account hasn't been used for anything useful. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 17:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - potentially useful. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Kept per Mike.lifeguard as this image is properly described and categorized, making a use within the Wikimedia projects not unlikely, e.g. for documenting the use of firearms by minors in the 50ies. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Not PD-ineligible.The uploader may not have realised that long chunks of text will be protected as a "literary work", in the same way that the text of a novel is protected. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's public text from USSR time handbook in Estonian language, about plan to build PostOffice in Tallinn for 1980 OlympicGames.
- The final look of building is much different from plan, look here et:Tallinna Postimaja
- Suwa (talk) 05:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per MichaelMaggs. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Not a notable person: out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 17:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per GeorgHH. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Wrong upload - have already uploaded Image:DirkvdM Artis-Aqarium zuid 03.png , which does work DirkvdM (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted as requested by the uploader. The better image was meanwhile moved to File:Artis-Aquarium zuid 03.png. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I misspelled the name when uploading, the correct name should be SpanishPod_newbie_lesson_A0030.ogg Martin (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted as misnamed duplicated as requested. Please note that such cases can be speedy-deleted using the {{Badname}} template. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I misspelled the name when uploading, the correct name should be SpanishPod newbie lesson A0035.ogg Martin (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted as requested as misnamed duplicate. Please note that such files can be speedy-deleted using the {{Badname}} template. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Gracias pero no queremos leer esto. Esta fuera de nuestro alcance del proyecto. -Nard the Bard 18:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination & COM:SCOPE abf « Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 13:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Files by Drebert
[edit]- Image:Back Yard.jpg
- Image:Front Yard 1.jpg
- Image:Doug 2005.jpg
- Image:Christmas 2005.JPG
- Image:2005 Christmas.JPG
- Image:Kelowna 1994.jpg
- Image:25th Anniversary 2002.jpg
- Image:Jim Fishing.jpg
- Image:1957 Chevy.jpg
- Image:Mechanics.jpg
- Image:Pool Mom.jpg
- Image:Mom at Pool.jpg
- Image:Mechanics2.jpg
- Image:Large Tree.jpg
- Image:Vacation House.jpg
- Image:Vacation House2.jpg
- Image:Playground Ball.jpg
- Image:School Day.jpg
- Image:Jim on Hole -1.jpg
- Image:Maria at Laguna.jpg
- Image:Jim in Pool.jpg
- Image:Jim & Doug in Pool.jpg
- Image:Dad and Mom in pool.jpg
- Image:Ball team.jpg
- Image:Breadfruit Tree 1.jpg
- Image:Beach 5.jpg
- Image:Beach 4.jpg
- Image:Beach 3.jpg
- Image:Pistol 1.jpg
- Image:Cargo Ship 2.jpg
- Image:Front Yard.jpg
- Image:Tennis Court.jpg
- Image:Beach 2.jpg
- Image:Ball Team.jpg
- Image:Gold Mom.jpg
- Image:Hunters 2.jpg
- Image:Hunters.jpg
- Image:Jim putting.jpg
- Image:Father and son.jpg
- Image:Dad chipping.jpg
- Image:Gold course hole number 4.jpg
- Image:Prinzipolka River.jpg
- Image:Allen Drebert.jpg
- Image:Mom and Brothers.jpg
- Image:Classmates.jpg
- Image:Snake on road.jpg
- Image:Brothers in Siuna.jpg
Private image collection, out of scope. --GeorgHH • talk 12:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- I deleted some of them. Some more might have to go. Yann (talk) 13:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. All private images with little value. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Battle of Karameh
[edit]- Image:Battle of Karameh1.jpg
- Image:Battle of Karameh2.jpg
- Image:Battle of Karameh3.jpg
- Image:Battle of Karameh4.jpg
- Image:Operation Asuta.jpg
These Images were taken in Jordan during Battle of Karameh, but there's no evidence that they were first published there. The source is an Israeli website, that usually features photos taken by Israeli soldiers, so these images were probably first published in Israel, and copyrighted until 2018. Alonr (talk) 14:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Could be. Too bad the site doesn't give any details. I wonder where this information can be obtained. -- Nudve (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per Alonr as any proof is missing that these images were published in Jordan first. Given that they are probably taken by Isreali soldiers, this is even highly unlikely. --AFBorchert (talk) 10:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Derivative work, USA, 1957 Teofilo (talk) 14:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep It says these were affixed to homes by the hundreds of thousands, but there is no copyright notice on them, making the work {{PD-US-no notice}}. -Nard the Bard 14:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Don't you think the copyright notice might be written on the box ? Teofilo (talk) 15:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Or on the reverse ? Teofilo (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Don't you think the copyright notice might be written on the box ? Teofilo (talk) 15:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Is this image empty or does my browser don't like it? -- Cecil (talk) 09:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- XCF is the "source" format used by GIMP; I don't think browsers support it directly. The file opens fine in GIMP; Image:Stylized Colored Milky Way Stargate.jpg is a Jpeg of the same image.
- A separate concern is that this (and other files in Category:Stargates) may constitute derivative fan art of Stargate. --dave pape (talk) 17:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete Wrong file format.
- Category:Goa'uld symbols also looks like it contains a load of copyvios. --Simonxag (talk) 16:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- I disagree that it's a "wrong format" - XCF is specifically listed as an allowed format at Commons:File types. It's appropriate, because people collaborating on illustrations need to be able to share the original version that maintains layers, etc.; XCF is the free content alternative to PSD. Copyright is still a question, though. --dave pape (talk) 19:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- I stand corrected (though I'm still a bit dubious about a format that browsers can't read). --Simonxag (talk) 22:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- I disagree that it's a "wrong format" - XCF is specifically listed as an allowed format at Commons:File types. It's appropriate, because people collaborating on illustrations need to be able to share the original version that maintains layers, etc.; XCF is the free content alternative to PSD. Copyright is still a question, though. --dave pape (talk) 19:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Kept for this specific issue per Commons:File types, although the svg format is also good for collaborative editing, and the fanart question remains Badseed talk 04:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
as source it says in Polish "made by the band's photographer". If so, there should be a permission on OTRS, and there's not. Powerek38 (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment but Author=Atheerel, as well as uploader. Isnt it enough? If not - there are 4-5 more photos of that author, regarding the same case. Masur (talk) 04:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Kept, AGF per Masur. Kameraad Pjotr 12:12, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned, unlinked bad GIF, a better JPG version is here. OsamaK 19:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hm... in addition this could be (like the other image) a copyvio as {{PD-US}} doesn't apply as long there is no proof given for a publication before 1923 or some other indication that this is indeed PD. I've filed the other image for deletion as well for the very same reason. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- This happens to be my family photo. It is a picture of my grandfather. I have in my possession the picture and scanned it in and uploaded to Wikipedia Commons. I don't see any other people that would claim possession of any copyrights to the photograph. If anybody has the copyrights to the picture, it would have to be me. The photographer is unknown and never was known. The Caldwell family records say it was taken in 1920, some 89 years ago. I am putting the picture into public domain. It was a promotion picture taken by his employer, Mitchell Lumber Company (a company that decades ago went out of business).--Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep per Doug Coldwell. The GIF crops off the spots on the right hand side of the JPG, which does make it look better; if you want to persuade Mr. Coldwell that the JPG is a better format, great, but don't do it with the hammer of a deletion request, do it with words. --GRuban (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Frank_Caldwell.jpg --GRuban (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Kept. PD-US Yann (talk) 19:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
