Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/09/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Out of Wikimedia projects' scope. Was uploaded for a nn article speedily deleted on the English Wikipedia (w:Ben Cowan); no encyclopedic use. AllynJ (talk) 03:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Also, shows a work of art not protected by FOP. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Appears to show email addresses of private individuals Alan012 (talk) 12:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope, show private addresses. Yann (talk) 21:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
as of COM:SCOPE. Taken from the original image description "Hipopotomonstrosesquipedaliofobia" it's just a (bad) joke. Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Fake licensing, it is my photo taken by a photographer who has never released it under GFDL. Used on ru-wiki by a user who is indefblocked for personal attacks, by all common sense by the same person who uploaded it to the Commons. --Mitrius (talk) 15:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Platonides: Attack image
as of COM:SCOPE. Uploaded by 1-edit-uploader; may be intended for attack purposes. Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
copyvio: Screenshot of copyrighted google map 87.178.112.243 18:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 21:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
as of COM:SCOPE. Most versions of/under this file are rather private images. Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Speedyed because user was continuing uploading out of scope images concerning personallity-right-violation. abf /talk to me/ 19:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
copyviol Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 19:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete I couldn't find the picture on the website, but the website is certainly non-free and as it is given as source... Guérin Nicolas (messages) 20:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. by Túrelio Yann (talk) 21:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
image is far too small (60 × 49 Pixel) to be of any use. Túrelio (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Info It might be used as an icon, but i don't think it will be. Anyway this picture is not used on any project. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 19:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Looks like a press photo to me. Not sure of the flickr user has the rights of it. --Sterkebaktalk 16:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted as CC-BY-NC. →Christian.И 10:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Looks like a press photo to me. Not sure of the flickr user has the rights of it. --Sterkebaktalk 16:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the Flickr user calls himself "Ford Motor Company". Looking at his Flickr images, that seems to be true. So, probably it's someone of Fords' PR department. As long as it doesn't become SPAM, it might be o.k. --Túrelio (talk) 16:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Okey, i was not sure of my case so i nominated for deletion. Now i hear your opinion its also fine by me :) Sterkebaktalk 16:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yet, I clearly see some sort of "CC-BY-NC" icon in the corner. ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- Flickrwashing? Sterkebaktalk 07:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I hadn't noticed that. Then, it has to go for NC. --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
We need the permission via OTRS. Deleted until further notice. →Christian.И 10:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:Fresneda_de_la_Sierra_Cuenca-Las_Zorreras-Fuertescusa_1-ED-50-UTM-USO_30_X-569842_Y-4478438.JPG
[edit]El nombre del fichero refleja una coordenadas erróneas, se sube nuevo fichero con nombre corregido Thecubillo (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, duplicate. Martin H. (talk) 17:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I do not believe this promo photo was actually taken by the uploader Mangostar (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete Agreed, delete. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
This spoken version of the article is now almost three years old and does not represent the current state of the article, which has changed significantly. Some of the information in this spoken version is now out of date. TomPhil (talk) 23:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Per user request. --Martin H. (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Out of scope -- i don't see anything :S Sterkebaktalk 19:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Justifications of the image: I admit that the quality is not the great thing. i´ll improve it in the future with a better camera. Thanks for the advise. Although. is a foto with a bad camera to another foto with at least 65 years old. Thanks for your time and excuse my english. --Juanfa61 (talk) 19:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Not NASA work. The source page notes (under 'Acknowledgements') "the underwater picture was provided by Kevin Keegan of West Virginia Divers." dave pape (talk) 04:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. Missed that when I uploaded. This image should be deleted Dnowacki (talk) 04:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:2008 Fresneda de la Sierra Cuenca-Las Zorreras-Fuertescusa 2-ED-50-UTM-USO 30 X-569800 Y-4478471.JPG
[edit]El nombre del fichero refleja una coordenadas erróneas, se sube nuevo fichero con nombre corregido. --Thecubillo (talk) 10:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Info Can you provide the title or link of the new file having the correct name? (Donde es el nuevo fichero con nombre corregido?) Guérin Nicolas (messages) 20:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 13:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:2008_Fresneda_de_la_Sierra_Cuenca-Las_Zorreras-Fuertescusa_1-ED-50-UTM-USO_30_X-569800_Y-4478471.JPG
[edit]El nombre del fichero refleja una coordenadas erróneas, se sube nuevo fichero con nombre corregido Thecubillo (talk) 10:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 13:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:2008_Fresneda_de_la_Sierra_Cuenca-Las_Zorreras-Fuertescusa_ED-50-UTM-USO_30_X-569567_Y-4478372.JPG
[edit]El nombre del fichero refleja una coordenadas erróneas, se sube nuevo fichero con nombre corregido Thecubillo (talk) 11:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 13:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:2008_Fresneda_de_la_Sierra_Cuenca-Las_Zorreras-Fuertescusa_ED-50-UTM-USO_30_X-569657_Y-4478588.JPG
[edit]El nombre del fichero refleja una coordenadas erróneas, se sube nuevo fichero con nombre corregido 195.10.201.30 11:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 13:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:2008_Fresneda_de_la_Sierra_Cuenca-Las_Zorreras-Fuertescusa_2-ED-50-UTM-USO_30_X-569567_Y-4478372.JPG
[edit]El nombre del fichero refleja una coordenadas erróneas, se sube nuevo fichero con nombre corregido 195.10.201.30 11:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 13:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:2008_Fresneda_de_la_Sierra_Cuenca-Las_Zorreras-Fuertescusa_1-ED-50-UTM-USO_30_X-569567_Y-4478372.JPG
[edit]El nombre del fichero refleja una coordenadas erróneas, se sube nuevo fichero con nombre corregido Thecubillo (talk) 11:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Re-upload the file with the correct name, then link it here in order to show that it is a duplicated file. Guérin Nicolas (messages) 20:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 13:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Image of a copyrigted statue. No freedom of panorama for public statues in norway 84.48.93.123 20:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. As there is only noncommericial FOP in Norway, such images are against commonst policy. --Kjetil_r 20:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I can't see anything on the picture. (out of scope) Sterkebaktalk 19:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Comment it poor quality but it is good identifiable. I rather think, this image is a copyvio (photo of copyrighted image) like most of the other contribs of this user. --Martin H. (talk) 22:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- This image is also then: Image:Machito.jpg.jpg Sterkebaktalk 20:45, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- The user has uploaded a better version over the first version. --Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, but i kept the deletion request on the side because the image is a suspected copyvio, seems to be a photo of an other image. --Martin H. (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete: Like the uploader says on my discussion page [1]: The images are taken from Covers, the author and date is unknown. Uploader is not the author, there is no indication to say, that this image is public domain because it is old because we dont know how old it is and who made it. --Martin H. (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, per [2], thanks to Juan for helping. --Martin H. (talk) 21:21, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Sbazzone (talk) 11:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Wrong image.
Deleted, per request. --Martin H. (talk) 14:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Typo in filename Dh3201 (talk) 16:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Wrong place use Template:Bad name, see Commons:Deletion_guidelines#Speedy_deletion for further info.--Otterathome (talk) 13:36, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Bad quality. There are lots of good knife images that can replace this one. -Zinnmann (talk) 12:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of scope: too poor quality to be of any use. Yann (talk) 19:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
This image is a hoax (see en:Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse/Roitr). There is no such image in the claimed source. Here [3] is the source page related to Russian army ranks. The same rank has completely different imnsignia according the source. 15:08, 22 September 2008 79.111.161.178 (talk · contribs)
- Image:Starschina.gif and Image:Praporschik.gif are related to this deletion request. --Martin H. (talk) 13:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete delete all. Roitr hoax. -Nard the Bard 14:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted all three. - Anonymous DissidentTalk 17:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This appears to be a 3D object. The subject is undoubtedly PD, but the image thereof would not be (Bridgeman applies to 2D). Version at the source has a copyright notice. --Эlcobbola talk 21:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nothing creative added by the reproduction. If the framing is considered creative, crop the 2d artwork and reupload. -Nard the Bard 00:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)- Keep as uploader. Nard says exactly what I was going to say. It is clearly a painting, and as such 2D. I don't see how the inclusion of the frame could possibly make it 3D (no physical object can actually be entirely 2D). As for the copyright notice, that's irrelevant if the photo is not eligible for copyright. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lampman (talk • contribs) (UTC)
- Keep per both. FWIW the frame is original (ca 1400). Johnbod (talk) 22:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Kept - this is two-dimensional, and is therefore is not copyright eligible. - Anonymous DissidentTalk 15:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
as of resolution/size. Image too small to be really of use. Túrelio (talk) 16:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Kved: In category Unknown as of 26 September 2008; no license
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
No evidence for PD-old. 1900 is not old enough. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Code·is·poetry 21:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Imagen no coincide con especificaciones internacionales, autor solicita borrado. 00:24, 21 August 2008 Mr. Tamagotchi (talk · contribs)
- Comment can you please first replace it on es:Contaminación radiactiva like the other images (Image:Radiacion b.png e.g.)? --Martin H. (talk) 16:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 20:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
No indication given that this has been released under a CC license. Too new for PD-old (taken in 1933). Giggy (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Apologies. I moved this from en-wiki on request of simple:User:RyanCross on IRC. Microchip08 (talk) 19:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am trying to file a proper request with the Bentley Historical Library.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Giggy (talk) 12:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Image is claimed to be PD based on the phrase "Data can be used freely (no guarantees for their accuracy are given, as this usually depends on the source of the data)" on the website which means that geohive is not the author.
A replacement image could be Image:Andora.png or Image:0 Andorra parishes all.svg --Hardscarf 07:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Deleted. Giggy (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
"Source=eigene Quelle" (own source) is not plausible. MBq (talk) 07:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Giggy (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
No plausible source information. Some articles of this author have been deleted in german wp yesterday [4] [5] MBq (talk) 07:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Giggy (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
No source available. --11:16, 1 September 2008 ComputerHotline (talk · contribs)
- Keep The source is not avalible now, but this image was uploaded 2006. In use on 7 pages in three projects. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Kept. A source is provided. Giggy (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
probable copyright violation. 13:23, 24 August 2008 Yann (talk · contribs)
Deleted. Giggy (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
This flag is a ficton. 23:30, 13 September 2008 Unomano (talk · contribs)
Kept. Same as Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Flag of Little Russia.PNG. Giggy (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
This is not a real flag. 02:11, 18 September 2008 Ilyaroz (talk · contribs)
- Keep, If you look at Category:Special or fictional flags you'd see that it is not sufficient reason for deletion. We have a number of fake or fictional flag, and one more never hurts. --Oren neu dag (talk) 12:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Kept. Giggy (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
probable copyright violation. 13:23, 24 August 2008 Yann (talk · contribs)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Photo of a screen. FunkMonk (talk) 17:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Derivative work, picture taken of the screen. Kimsə (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The original is still under copyright for this year as the artist died in 1938. Deletion has consent of uploader. Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Can be reuploaded/restored next year. Giggy (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Image of a copyrighted statue. Freedom of panorama does not extend to statues in Norway. Rettetast (talk) 20:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. COM:FOP#Norway. Giggy (talk) 12:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
This map is a Postmann-Michael-Fake: There is no source given and it is very inaccurate.
- Vilnius was not given to Lithuania in 1938 by the Poland. It was conquered and annexed as part of Belarusiaby the Soviet Union in September 1939. Later that year it was transfered to Lithunia.
- The SU didn't attack or annex the Baltic states in 1939, but in 1940.
- The w:en:Soviet invasion of Poland (1939) didn't start on 03-09-1939, but two weeks later. Syrcro (talk) 11:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I understand your concern but it is not up to Commons to sort out the correctness of a map. Currently, this map is used by 9 Wikipedia projects. As long as this map is properly licensed and widely used it will surely be kept at Commons. I suggest to look for better maps or to create a new map and then to convince all the Wikipedia communities to move to the improved map. Once this has been achieved, we can delete this map on the ground that it has been substituted by an improved version. Independent from this, I would recommend to add all your objections to the talk page of the map such that they are noted by all who intend to use it. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, if would be not repaired. I am sure incorectnesses like here disqualificate this picture. I agree, "it is not up by Commons", but it is up to people (who work with encyclopedia that anyone can edit). It is very easy - if the picture would not be corrected by author or by somebody - to remove it from 9 projects. Wikipedia has to show true facts, not replicate errors. Julo (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. It should stay until a better map is provided, or maybe this one - repaired with a source. Until then it should be kept, as it is, apparently, in wide use. Personally, I prefer a repair - first of all, the changes are described in german, which is by far not a language as spoken as english. Second, the description timing is quite too short for a normal person to read, so the dates that appear are hard to notice. -
Tourbillon 13:09, 27 September 2008 (UTC) - Comment I have notified all Wikipedia projects who use this image in at least one of their articles. This image is no longer referenced in the German or in the Polish Wikipedia (with the exception of a talk page). Currently, there are references left in the English, Japanese, Spanish, Bulgarian, and Albanian Wikipedia. I have removed all references to this map from gallery pages at Commons. Appropriate replacements or improvements would be welcomed. Please take notice of the correspondence regarding this deletion request on my talk page. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Neutral I don't see the reason to delete the image. Citing Commons "Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository making available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content (images, sound and video clips) to all." However the image was removed from Wikipedia in Albanian. Waiting the repair of the image. -- eagleal 15:42, 27 September 2008 (UTC)- Delete If not repaired before deletion poll runs out, per "Postmann-Michael-Fake". Postmann Micheal is somewhat of a German equivalent to User Roylee on English Wikipedia, just much more prolific. His "contributions" still plague segments of German Wikipedia. Whenever something done by him can be sorted out one way or the other, it should be sorted IMHO. And in case there is no-one to repair, revert. Yaan (talk) 21:48, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- delete - the creator was banned infinitely from de-WP for deliberately distorting historic facts. He "specialized" in manipulated maps that do not show reality but his POV. Is it much better not to have a map at all, than a deliberately false one. --h-stt !? 08:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I have no view about the accuracy of the map but COM:PS is quite clear that it must be kept if it is being used in good faith on on of the WMF projects. Stage 1 for those who would like to get rid of it is to get it removed from the projects, eg by uploading something more accurate and getting that used instead. Until then, our policy is that it must stay. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Micheal, you are dead wrong in your interpretation of the policy. The falsehood of the map has been proven, the creator has been banned indefinitely for it, thus his works do not enjoy good faith anymore. Distorted information is much worse than no information. Get rid of it. Now! --h-stt !? 07:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, H-stt, this would violate Commons policies. Commons is not the battleground to have debates about the factual correctness of maps. You are free to note on the image page that its contents is disputed by using the {{Disputed diagram}} template (nobody has done this until now), to summarize all its problems on its talk page, to see that it gets fixed or replaced, and to convince all projects that use it to remove or substitute it. So far, I haven't seen any of these activities from anyone here who pleaded for deletion. The Japanese, Spanish, and Bulgarian Wikipedia are still using this image within regular articles. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Micheal, you are dead wrong in your interpretation of the policy. The falsehood of the map has been proven, the creator has been banned indefinitely for it, thus his works do not enjoy good faith anymore. Distorted information is much worse than no information. Get rid of it. Now! --h-stt !? 07:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- KeepProjects are separate entities and commons serves as a repository for all free images. Unless the freeness of this image is disputed I do not see a reason to delete it. Further, NPOV in the usual sense does not apply, so POV-pushing is a non-issue. MBisanz talk 01:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment This image is now removed from the Japanese Wikipedia article pointed out by AFBorchert above. Spanish and Bulgarian wikipedias still have references from articles, though.--Makotoy (talk) 09:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. This image is in the process of being removed from projects (if not done already) with good reason; it is incorrect. I appreciate that Commons is not one to judge NPOV and the like, but we do a disservice to other projects, and to those who seek our content, by providing incorrect material such as this. Thus I delete this on the basis that it is effectively useless, and if it should not be used on any project — and thus fails to meet the project scope. Giggy (talk) 12:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC) IAR, if you will, though I prefer not to put it that way.
No date nor painter about this paiting, depiting a fact occurred in 1945 at latest.. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 15:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Too recent an event to be certain on copyright status. MBisanz talk 01:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Giggy (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Copyright notice says: "From http://www.arenal.net. The message on the photopage of their website says; All the photos on this website are the exclusive property of arenal.net © and can not be reproduced without our written consent EXCEPT for non-profit purposes with a credit to http://www.arenal.net." --Hardscarf 07:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Deleted, obvious: Commons only accepts images that everyone can use for every purpose (including commercial use) without further permission requests. --Martin H. (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Copyright notice says: "From http://www.arenal.net. The message on the photopage of their website says; All the photos on this website are the exclusive property of arenal.net © and can not be reproduced without our written consent EXCEPT for non-profit purposes with a credit to http://www.arenal.net." --Hardscarf 07:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Deleted, obvious: Commons only accepts images that everyone can use for every purpose (including commercial use) without further permission requests. Martin H. (talk) 16:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Copyright notice says: "From http://www.arenal.net. The message on the photopage of their website says; All the photos on this website are the exclusive property of arenal.net © and can not be reproduced without our written consent EXCEPT for non-profit purposes with a credit to http://www.arenal.net." --Hardscarf 07:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Deleted, obvious: Commons only accepts images that everyone can use for every purpose (including commercial use) without further permission requests.Martin H. (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not so sure the Russian government would look fondly upon granting official copyright free status to the money of a breakaway republic. OTH, one could argue the breakaway republic never passed its own copyright law, and hence inherited that existing in Russia for the brief period it was quasi-sovereign. In which case this bill would qualify. -Nard the Bard 14:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- There are several de facto states in the world which are not fully recognized by the international community. What does the law says about copyrights in these territories? How should we treat works from the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus or from Somaliland? This is weighty issue indeed.
- As for this specific image - I understand that this self declared republic doesn't exist anymore, hence the Russian law definitely applies. The uploader thought this image is a depiction of a banknote which, according to the RU law, is not copyrighted. However, this alleged banknote was not produced by the Russian government, so actually I'm not sure that no-copyright principle applies here. Drork (talk) 06:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- It has no any exempt status, and therefore falls under copyright protection. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 14:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Non-official. Do not fall {{PD-RU-exempt}} --Butko (talk) 12:54, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Butko: Copyright violation: Non-official. Do not fall exempt section
No indication why this is supposed to be in the public domain. It's a WWII photo; the author may well have died less than 70 years ago. Sandstein (talk) 23:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
As a part of wikipedia this photo is used for science and educational purposes without profit. According to german copyright law this is allowed, even if the owner is a private person. If the photographer was a army war correspondent (as many were), the state Bundesrepublik Deutschland is now owner of this photo. The state alows public use of all non-secret Documents.
Please remove the public domain tag and put on the place a explanation text of the license saying why this file can be here. Daniel Souza (talk) 18:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No explicit author/copyright information. "Science and educational purposes without profit" does not stand in Commons Badseed talk 07:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
This map (Image:A-Xankendi.PNG) does not show the borders of the autonomous, now de-facto independent Nagorno Karabagh region. It is used on several wikipedias for edit-warring, though Image:Azerbaijan-Khankendi.png is much more useful, as it shows the borders of the region within Azerbaijan. -- PhJ 10:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Kept. Used on az.wiki Badseed talk 00:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Having a hard time sizing (4x6/5x7) it for use on Cynthia Muvirimi's wiki . --15:53, 24 August 2008 Muvirimi (talk · contribs)
Kept. Not a valid delete reason Badseed talk 02:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
copyrighted work, not covered by freedom of panorama Polarlys (talk) 17:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Jules Perahim died in 2008 : too early for PD-old --Teofilo (talk) 00:09, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
This is a copy of the talk (in French) the uploader and I have been having on my talk page and his :
|
Jules Perahim
Les tableaux de Jules Perahim proviennent de ma collection d'images perso, je le connaissais personnellement, j'étais allé chez lui rue des Pyrénées à Paris. Au départ c'étaient des photos argentiques, puis j'ai tout scanné en entré en informatique. D'autres images de ces tableaux circulent: certaines sur des sites qui en vendent, d'autres sur les sites des musées qui en possèdent. Où est le problème ? Cordialement, --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Jules Perahim (bis)
Perahim et moi avons surtout parlé du passé. Il était déjà bien âgé. Il avait eu des relations ambigues avec d'autres peintres, dont ma mère, qui à la fois ont souffert et ont profité du système qu'il avait contribué à mettre en place. Lui, il pouvait cadrer, parfois durement, mais aider aussi. Moi je cherchais à démêler les faits au milieu de tous ces témoignages contradictoires. Puis nous avons évoqué de mon intention d'écrire et d'illustrer des articles sur Wiki sur les peintres. Il m'a autorisé à le faire, y compris avec mes photos, mais c'est resté verbal, il aurait voulu y jeter un oeil, mais il a décliné et on ne s'est plus revus. En tout cas les trois images que j'ai mises représentent des tableaux qu'il a vendus: le plus ancien (qui fait quelque chose comme 4 mètres de long) au Musée d'Art de Bucarest (qui le garde dans ses réserves, c'est là que je l'ai pris en 1991), les deux petits à des particuliers en France, je crois. Son épouse n'a jamais fait d'objection à leur présence dans l'article. En tout cas il ne s'agit pas d'un usage commercial (cela ne peut pas nuire aux détenteurs actuels non plus). C'est dommage de ne pas pouvoir illustrer un article sur un peintre, par des exemples de son art créatif. Par ailleurs, j'ai lu le texte de Nathalie Kaufmann et il y a dans son ajout des détails intéressants, que j'ai assez envie de rajouter dans l'article en faisant une synthèse sourcée (que je traduirais ensuite en roumain). Mais c'est pas la peine que je le fasse, si ensuite vous décidez de reverter. Pour finir, j'ai déjà eu cette discussion il y a quelques mois sur le wiki roumain, puis par mail avec divers ayant-droit des oeuvres de Perahim, et nous avons tous décidé de laisser les illustrations dans l'article roumain. Si c'est possible là, pourquoi pas dans l'article français ? Cordialement, viszont latàstra, --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
|
I think the following points are the most relevant for the decision to delete or keep here on Commons, so here is a brief English translation :
- We [Mr Manoliu & Mr Perahim] talked about my planning to write and illustrate Wiki articles on painters. He agreed, including with photographs, but that remained an oral assent ("Puis nous avons évoqué de mon intention d'écrire et d'illustrer des articles sur Wiki sur les peintres. Il m'a autorisé à le faire, y compris avec mes photos, mais c'est resté verbal")
- anyway this is no commercial use ("En tout cas il ne s'agit pas d'un usage commercial")
- I've already had that talk a few months ago on the Romanian Wiki, then by E-mail with various copyright holders of Perahim works and then we all decided to keep the pictures in the Romanian article ("j'ai déjà eu cette discussion il y a quelques mois sur le wiki roumain, puis par mail avec divers ayant-droit des oeuvres de Perahim, et nous avons tous décidé de laisser les illustrations dans l'article roumain.")
English translation by Teofilo (talk) 08:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't know the Romanian language, so it would be difficult for me to understand what has been said on the Romanian Wikipedia. But this situation looks like some sort of "fair use", which might be OK on the Romanian Wikipedia, but which is not OK on the French Wikipedia. My opinion at this stage is that the pictures should be deleted from Commons and to leave to the Romanian Wiki-community the decision to upload or not, separately, on the Romanian Wikipedia. Teofilo (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sorry, the informal agreement is not sufficient for the image to remain on Commons. We need a clear release under an allowable licence which allows both commercial and off-wiki use. To restore this we would need a proper release from the current owner of the copyright to OTRS. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Jules Perahim died in 2008 : too early for PD-old Teofilo (talk) 23:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sorry, the informal agreement is not sufficient for the image to remain on Commons. We need a clear release under an allowable licence which allows both commercial and off-wiki use. To restore this we would need a proper release from the current owner of the copyright to OTRS. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
author died in 2008 : this is too early for PD-old --Teofilo (talk) 23:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sorry, the informal agreement is not sufficient for the image to remain on Commons. We need a clear release under an allowable licence which allows both commercial and off-wiki use. To restore this we would need a proper release from the current owner of the copyright to OTRS. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC) MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Very blurred, poor quality --Deerhunter (talk) 13:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 13:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
No tiene validez. Yo soy el autor, no hay uso de la imagen GPO Morning (talk) 20:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 12:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
No es útil la imagen. Yo soy el autor, y no tendrá ninguna utilidad GPO Morning (talk) 20:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 13:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
No hay uso de esta imagen, no tiene validez. Yo soy el autor, y esta imagen no estará en uso GPO Morning (talk) 20:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 13:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Notorious spammer on it.wikipedia, aka Mlupis --19:49, 14 September 2008 87.17.247.154 (talk · contribs)
- Why exactly are you requesting deletion? Is this user known to make false own work claims? Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind, I had a closer look at the contribs of the user and I see what you're taling about. I opened a mass deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by Misserianni, please participate there. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Closed for now. Further discussion should take place on Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by Misserianni. -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Uploads by Raj Kamal Khare
[edit]- File:Swami Ji Maharaj.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Rai Saligram.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Shiv Brat Lal.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Shiv Brat Lals.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Arman Saheb.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sant Tarchand.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sant tarachand2.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sant tarachand3.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sant tarachand4.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Armaan Saheb.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Armaaan Saheb.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Armaan.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Armaanji.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sant Kanwar Singh.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sant Kanwar Singh1.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sant Kanwar Singh2.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sant Kanwar Singh3.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
User:Raj Kamal Khare does not seem to understand copyright law and has uploaded tons of images that all appear to be scans or taken from various websites. I think they should be deleted, unless he can add more information to specific photos indicating either that he took the photo with his own camera or that they are public domain for another reason. Mangostar (talk) 17:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Following images uploaded by me are not used in any article and can be deleted:
- Shiv_Brat_Lal.jpg
- Arman_Saheb.jpg
- Armaan_Saheb.jpg
- Armaan.jpg
- Sant_Tarchand.jpg
- Sant_tarachand4.jpg
Remaining images are my work or images used from an open sources and need to be kept:
- Swami_Ji_Maharaj.jpg
- Rai_Saligram.jpg
- Shiv_Brat_Lals.jpg
- Armaaan_Saheb.jpg
- Armaanji.jpg
- Sant_tarachand2.jpg
- Sant_tarachand3.jpg
- Sant_Kanwar_Singh.jpg
- Sant_Kanwar_Singh1.jpg
- Sant_Kanwar_Singh2.jpg
- Sant_Kanwar_Singh3.jpg
This was added by User:Raj Kamal Khare to the talk page. Mangostar (talk) 13:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Which are those open sources? They need to be stated, otherwise the images can't be kept... - Badseed talk 00:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. I deleted recent ones and tagged old ones with {{PD-India}}. Yann (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
and Image:Guatemala Mustang Attack 1958(2).jpg, Image:Guatemala Mustang Attack 1958(3).jpg, Image:Guatemala Mustang Attack 1958(4).jpg.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Why Ukrainian copyrights law is applied to Guatemala photos? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- True, I had not noticed that, and it is an obvious mistake from my part. Indeed the image was produced & released by the government of Guatemala. After inspecting again the tags, I advance that the scanned image is from the available evidence presented by the Government of Guatemala to the United Nations following the international altercation vs. Mexico in 1958-1959, and has been cropped a little bit for size and no special effects were added; therefore I propose to use the PD-scan tag. As the original document (which I have in my possesion) states, it was released to the international community as available evidence of the "restrained" military action by the Guatemalan Air Force, and therefore one should not expect the Guatemalan government to withdraw its public release and public property. Thank you, -BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Edited to add: I seem to have used the same wrong tag for all 4 images of the related article in Spanish, which I loaded simultaneously, but I do not seem to have access to edit their tag: Article: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflicto_M%C3%A9xico-Guatemala_(1958-1959)
- Image:Guatemala Mustang Attack 1958(2).jpg
- Image:Guatemala Mustang Attack 1958.jpg
- Image:Guatemala Mustang Attack 1958(3).jpg
- Image:Guatemala Mustang Attack 1958(4).jpg
-BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. I don't see anything in the Guatemalan copyright law that would make works created for the government (or the army) copyright-free. Publication of these photos by the Guatemalan government does not invalidate the copyright. And Guatemala has a copyright term of 75 years. Lupo 07:41, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}