Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

November 18

[edit]

Unlikely own work, missing metadata, can be found via Google even in 2016 articles. Gumruch (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent sculpture, and there is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The work was unveiled in 2020 and was authored by Julie Lluch.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 01:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is sourced to a third party, the Kiowa County Democrat newspaper. It is unknown who the actual photographer was, or when or where or how the newspaper obtained the photograph.

Issues of the Kiowa County Democrat from this period have been digitised only sporadically, and no issue from close to the date of this tornado are available. However -- available issues from 1905 include no photographs whatsoever. The earliest archived issues that feature editorial photography are from 1910.

So, although this image originates from the paper's archives, we have no evidence that it was ever published by them.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

  • public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
  • all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the Kiowa County Democrat on September 23 to ask for any more information about it. Their editor offered help within the next few days, but never replied again, even after a follow-up email I sent on November 5.

I forwarded our correspondence to the VRT: (ticket:2024111810004209)

Since this is an image created in the US before 1989, its copyright status will depend on the circumstances of its first publication, in particular, whether it was published before or after March 1, 1989. The earliest known publication of this image is on the NWS website where it was sourced. Unless any evidence of a previous publication can be found, this image is protected for 70 years after the death of its creator, or 120 years if its creator is never identified.

If it remains anonymous, it will enter the public domain on January 1, 2026. Without evidence to the contrary, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP until then.


Rlandmann (talk) 02:04, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by CalebEvans as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Object depicted is under crown copyright. No notice has been given that it is licensed under the OGL 3. - Kicking to DR to get eyes on this from someone that knows more about crown copyright The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible quality AI image of a subject (building collapse) that can be easily replaced with actual photos. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is some accidental AI-humor-level. It's hilarious how the debris is sticking to the wall of the building in the bottom image, as if it was glued to the building. A messy collapse in the top image, and a "clean" collapse in the bottom image, I guess. LoL Nakonana (talk) 19:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party, the Jefferson County EMA.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

  • public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
  • all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the EMA on August 30 to see what they knew about it. After some research, their Emergency Manager told me that their local Fire Chief witnessed the event but did not take the photo, and believes that it was taken by famous storm photographer Reed Trimmer. I forwarded our correspondence to the VRT: (ticket:2024110610000137)

I also attempted to contact Reed Trimmer via his business's social media account. I received an autoresponse, but nothing further. I forwarded evidence of this to the VRT: (ticket:2024111810004352)

We therefore do not know who the creator and presumed copyright holder of this image is. But since this is an image created in the US after 1989, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.


Rlandmann (talk) 02:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EricEdwards1978.png

completely useless FMSky (talk) 11:32, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not very tasteful, but surely not "completely useless": currently in use in 3 Wikipedia articles. Vysotsky (talk) 11:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vysotsky, Dronebogus, and Ikan Kekek: Not in use anymore, was replaced with a much better one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EricEdwards1978.png -- FMSky (talk) 20:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment A much better one that I uploaded myself, and the ones in use were replaced by ... FMSky. This image is illustrative for his profession. Vysotsky (talk) 21:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for showing the context. I'm not convinced the portrait is a better photo, but it's certainly better in that context. I have crossed out my vote and will leave it up to an admin to decide what to do with this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: apparently out of copyright; no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry screenshot of an actor for whom there is a portrait screenshot (File:EricEdwards1978.png). Not a good illustration of either the actor or the body part. No longer in use now that I have removed it from arz:ايريك_ادواردز. Yngvadottir (talk) 02:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag)  —Mayeenul Islam (TALK) 02:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a poster on the wall of the Conference Hall, not the poster itself. I took the image from the wall.  —Mayeenul Islam (TALK) 02:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

  • public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
  • all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.


Rlandmann (talk) 03:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Romualdas Kvintas died in 2018 and architect Alvidas Songaila is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Romualdas Kvintas died in 2018 and architect Alvidas Songaila is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Bronius Vyšniauskas died in 2015, architect Algimantas Nasvytis died in 2018 and Vytautas Nasvytis died in 2016 A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Gediminas Jokūbonis died in 2006 A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Gediminas Jokūbonis died in 2006 A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Antanas Kmieliauskas died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Gintautas Lukošaitis is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Zuzana Pranaitytė died in 2020 A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Regimantas Midvikis died in 2015 A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Bronius Vyšniauskas died in 2015, architect Algimantas Nasvytis died in 2018 and Vytautas Nasvytis died in 2016 A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Viktoras Palys died in 1987 A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Lithuania A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Dalia Matulaitė is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Is a copy of the picture found here, thus probably a copyright violation: https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=481&lot=62 Plozessor (talk) 04:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is part of history of Jewish Egyptians living in Egypt and the image of the midal is so old science 1927 Raafat (talk) 16:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photo is surely not from 1927. Also you incorrectly specified "Own work" as source in the description. Plozessor (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

article in image form, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


low quality, appears to be out of scope Adsci8 (talk) 04:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No evidence that the file has fallen into the public domain. The image was uploaded due to an incorrect interpretation of what freedom of panorama means. Tbhotch 04:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also

Uploader claims that this is an image by the US National Weather Service, but this is unverifiable without a more precise source. Reverse image searches on Tineye and Google do not find this image.

Rlandmann (talk) 05:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep under PD-automated: Look, I'll be honest, I lied about the source back in April and forgot about the image. This is not from the National Weather Service. but is from a USDoT automated camera, I screenshotted it during a livestream. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 20:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EF5 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination -- this turns out to be an automated image, ineligible for copyright --Rlandmann (talk) 04:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dates of creation and first publication missing, dubious PD-rationale (70 pma for an unknown author). Komarof (talk) 05:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The link is 404, but if this is really a photo from the Russian Empire, it dates to at least 1917. I thought all photos from the Czarist period had been declared to be public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Malcolm bust (1990s)

[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. The bust was installed during the term of the late city councillor Nars Padilla (1992–95) as per this news article, meaning this bust is still under sculptural copyright and is unfree to be commercially hosted here.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 05:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Fantasy election map, outside project scope Adeletron 3030 (talk) 05:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by TimeTreks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal AI art with no apparent encyclopedic use, COM:SCOPE, COM:WEBHOST

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 05:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding File:Convicts For Trump.jpg to the batch Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IN the coming four years every one will want these put back, Wiki is a scholarly and educational enterprise . This is poliltical satire and commentary on our times. If they were about anyone but Trump there would be no problem Smart educated folks who respect democracy the law , the american constitution, free press and free speech better stick together and stand up for those things. We have a felon now as the president of the US. It is a total travesty and could easily bring our country and all media down including wiki. All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. TimeTreks (talk) 17:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


2D artwork in New Zealand is not covered by FOP Schwede66 05:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in China for 2D posters. likely Derivative works. 茅野ふたば (talk) 07:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There is no Freedom of Panorama in China for 2D posters. likely Derivative works. 茅野ふたば (talk) 07:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There is no Freedom of Panorama in China for 2D posters. the BK poster likely Derivative works. 茅野ふたば (talk) 07:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This file was initially tagged by Lev. Anthony as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio, no freedom of panorama in France
Converted to regular DR, as usual in FoP-cases. Nevertheless, the rationale "no FoP in France" and "work of art above COM:TOO" is valid. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no own work 2003:E5:FF28:7F71:2DA3:C5F8:4FD5:7A2 09:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no own work 2003:E5:FF28:7F71:2DA3:C5F8:4FD5:7A2 09:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This picture is my own work! Please delete this Deletion request. Thanks T7t7t7 (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 23.237.216.49 as no permission ( Keep: Public Domain (California Government)) Xeror (talk) 10:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 23.237.216.49 as no permission ( Keep: Public Domain (California Government)) Xeror (talk) 10:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 23.237.216.49 as no permission ( Keep: Public Domain (California Government)) Xeror (talk) 10:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 23.237.216.49 as no permission ( Keep: Public Domain (California Government)) Xeror (talk) 10:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 23.237.216.49 as no permission ( Keep: Public Domain (California Government)) Xeror (talk) 10:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 23.237.216.49 as no permission ( Keep: Public Domain (California Government)) Xeror (talk) 10:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 23.237.216.49 as no permission ( Keep: Public Domain (California Government)) Xeror (talk) 10:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RACHID BAYA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence of free license for these book covers. We need permissions.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph of a painting by Salvador Dalí, which is still protected by copyright until January 1, 2060. 81.41.176.97 10:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:SIGNS. This cannot be considered a 2D "works of artistic craftsmanship" as defined by COM:FOP UK. Voice of Clam 10:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:SIGNS. This cannot be considered a 2D "works of artistic craftsmanship" as defined by COM:FOP UK. Voice of Clam 11:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Divnanoc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works by Rene Portocarrero, a Cuban artist who died in 1985. Copyrighted in Cuba expires 50 years after the artist’s death, which would be 2035.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Divnanoc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paints by Mario Cortiello, an Italian artist who died in 1981. Copyright expires 70 years after the artist’s death, in 2051.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Divnanoc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

By an American artist who died in 1984, copyright expires in 2054.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No educational use, uploaded to illustrate a biography that was deleted at pt.wiki for lack of notability. Solon 26.125 12:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

too rough for usage in mainspace as it stands Coeusin (talk) 12:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Coeusin I will remove it from mainspace but you can't nominate a file when its quit own work and no license issue Edasf (talk) 12:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest to please withdraw this nomination keep this file so I will improve it if you had such issue you should have conulted me on my talk page.@Coeusin Edasf (talk) 12:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: no realistic educational value. Porr quality image. Very low resolution. Dark. Much better images of subject matter "Men" on Wikimeadi Commons Headlock0225 (talk) 12:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unclear photo EX Centre from Star Avenue 2018 (talk) 12:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake Andreslence20 (talk) 12:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Andreslence20 (talk) 12:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lo subí por error Andreslence20 (talk) 12:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete user req (only 12 days later). Taylor 49 (talk) 18:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I uploaded it by mistake Andreslence20 (talk) 12:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake Andreslence20 (talk) 12:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake Andreslence20 (talk) 12:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded today, no EXIF, unknown author, not clear what Inside Nigeria Network is. I can find it on Instagram here: https://www.instagram.com/pageant.poll_/p/DCctAEnIelf/ with no free license. I think we need more proof that it is under a free license than ... nothing. GRuban (talk) 12:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete because I think it is also a fair use image that was published from the original photographer or author which is I really don't know that if real name who it is, same as File:Miss Univers 2024.jpg. Apipattana (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also same as File:Victoria Kjær Theilvig.tif; the cropped image of File:Miss Univers 2024.jpg which is also deleted due to a same reasons (CSD F1). Apipattana (talk) 15:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not pd in italy, it is pd in the us due to it being recorded in 1923 but the actual performer (giovanni martineli) died in 1969, therefore can only be transferred to commons in 2039) Noob282 (talk) 12:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

might retract if eu copyright law applies to recordings with base 50/70 years only and doesnt calculate from performer death and 50/70 years Noob282 (talk) 13:05, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © jiri.ryszawy - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

non-free 3D work in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 13:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This logo does not look too simple to be considered {{PD-textlogo}} WindEwriX (talk) 13:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


see EXIF: copyright holder and photographer is "Dominik Butzmann", no permission via COM:VRT DCB (talk) 13:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 13:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]



This logo does not look enough simple to be considered {{PD-textlogo}} WindEwriX (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see EXIF: photographer is "Stefan Trocha | Photography", no permission via COM:VRT DCB (talk) 13:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original research by wiki user. We have a file with a logo from film: file:Skynet Terminator logo.png. MBH 13:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protected logo, not under public domain מקף־עברי (talk) 14:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by DesiBoy101 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not original work of the user Yann (talk) 14:23, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Muskan9600 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Famous tourist places from the 4 corners of India, small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No source, wrong license. Yann (talk) 14:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing on this

James Worthy Singer, Songwriter

2601:201:8300:8E30:9485:53D2:A5B1:A29F 15:04, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not like own work UltimoGrimm (talk) 15:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's my first work and My image. I think it's wrong copywright. So remove it Delwar17:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use, and I don't see the "wrong copywright". Please be more specific than that. --Rosenzweig τ 16:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's my first uploaded picture and not mention proper author-name. So delete it as requested by the author. Delwar15:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can edit that, can't you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's my first work and My image. I think it's wrong copywright. So remove it Delwar17:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use, and I don't see the "wrong copywright". Please be more specific than that. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's my first uploaded picture and not mention proper author-name. So delete it as requested by the author. Delwar15:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused AI-generated image, out of scope. There is also probably an issue with the character copyright. Yann (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Duplicate of File:Flag of Spain (civil).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thixpro is not mentioned in en.wiki and in my opinion the company and its logo are non-notable. Taivo (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly a placeholder or temporary logo… VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality duplicate of File:Charles Meynier - Androcles and the lion.jpg Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:TOYS Nutshinou Talk! 17:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-KPGov}} is simply not working with this image. The basic requirements for using this licensing are not met. Msb (talk) 18:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This footage is part of an image set published by the North Korean state media. --Msb (talk) 18:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-KPGov}} is simply not working with this image. The basic requirements for using this licensing are not met. This footage is part of an image set published by the North Korean state media. Msb (talk) 18:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot 186.173.233.253 18:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Distorted TSE images

[edit]

These files where uploaded by myself as a part of batch of images available on TSE's open data portal. Unfortunately, these images are quite distorted, probably stretched or squished to fit the 161 × 225 pixels resolution. I belive the distortion leads these images to not accuratly represent their subjects and therefore don't fulfill an educational pourpuse. --Pfcab (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-KPGov}} is simply not working with this image. The basic requirements for using this licensing are not met. Msb (talk) 18:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, self promotional logo; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:06, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Tanyo CRM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Aeiourt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artist from Italy that died in 1972; Undelete works before 1948 in 2043.

Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Odisha News (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I can't comprehend the CC licensing. Isn't this an obvious copyvio? JD {æ} 19:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unauthenticated portrait speculated to be Walt Whitman sourced to an unidentified private collection. It doesn't look much like him, particularly not the eyes and eyebrows. No other usage online except for an msn.com article from a few months ago which credits it to Commons. Belbury (talk) 19:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation; found on web at https://www.hoyesarte.com/sin-categoria/bardasano-en-guerra_97052/ with a 2011 publish date. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is very blurry. Taivo (talk) 19:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


wrong move while editing File:The Dome from Rooftop 58 - 18 novembre 2024 - 10.jpg Stratoswift (talk) 19:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work according to this post on Mehreen's facebook page LaffyTaffer (talk) 19:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not more a user than some people claiming to be musicians 186.172.216.232 20:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the 1996 logo of TV Globo and given that fandom doesn't own the rights to the logos it hosts, the question is whether this is sufficiently simple for copyright not to apply. I'd say this isn't simple enough and hence, it should be deleted. Schwede66 20:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see a restaurant here, but as I'm not an admin some people may say keep. 186.172.216.232 20:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I was there, sitting with a friend after a mountain bike tour. Eating the kebab in front of the restaurant. You can see the kebab and the building behind. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 20:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And please log in. An IP starting several deletion requests as first edits should be blocked in my opinion. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 21:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should also whip them. 186.172.216.232 21:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is provoking and trolling. No inexperienced IP starts immediately with deletion requests. Unfortunately, you lack a real, serious desire to contribute usefully to wikimedia commons. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 21:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And you decided that because I consider a file of yours out of scope?! That is really interesting. Please don't lose more of my time. 186.172.216.232 21:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep A photo of a kebab sandwich is in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The use of Wikipedia Commons also provides supporting photos for otherwise banal image motifs. These photos are required for Wiki Voyage or Openstreetmap, for example. It is then unimportant whether an image shows the entire object or just a section. Traffic signs, hiking trail signs, a practice sign on the front door or, here, a table with food and guests. -- EACC80 (talk) 09:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Karl Gruber as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: 1 Gleiches Bild wie "File:Franz Gratzers Poststellwagen vor dem Stiftsgasthaus Heiligenkreuz (NÖ) 1887.jpg" Larger resolution, and uploader is someone else. Yann (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created erroneously. Not used on any wiki. File:Montreal public transit icons - Transport adapté.svg is the canonical version. One of Many Tims (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Identical to File: David Ben-Gurion visit to Ashdod-Yam, 12 February 1959 05.jpg מקף־עברי (talk) 21:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Identical to File: David Ben-Gurion visit to Ashdod-Yam, 12 February 1959 04.jpg מקף־עברי (talk) 21:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Identical to File: David Ben-Gurion visit to Ashdod-Yam, 12 February 1959 06.jpg מקף־עברי (talk) 21:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Identical to File: David Ben-Gurion visit to Ashdod-Yam, 12 February 1959 02.jpg מקף־עברי (talk) 22:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wasif98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


press photo: This file was initially tagged by GiovanniPen as no permission (No permission since) GioviPen GP msg 22:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo press photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 22:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Composer died in 2004, we'd need VRT permission from the composer's estate. Undelete in 2075. Abzeronow (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1971 published photo from Turkey, would need VRT permission from the photography studio. Abzeronow (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no source, no info, unclear author info GioviPen GP msg 22:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

probably not self GioviPen GP msg 23:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims this as their own work, but copies from diverse sources on the web are known from many years prior to upload here.[1][2]

The photo also appers in Thomas P. Grazulis' definitive Significant Tornadoes 1680-1991: A Chronology and Analysis of Events, page 549, credited to Donald Mayden.

The only reason I'm not speedying this is, as a US image taken prior to 1989, there's a possibility it entered the public domain via non-compliance with the required formalities of the day, so I want to give anyone who wants to keep it a chance to determine that. Rlandmann (talk) 23:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

low quality, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 23:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


low quality, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 23:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


promo, no source/information (prob not self); out of scope GioviPen GP msg 23:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


out of scope, no real source or valid description. unused GioviPen GP msg 23:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


possible copyvio © Peter Drechsler - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of Bust of Kustaa Hiekka, unveiled in 1939, sculpture by Finnish sculptor Yrjö Liipola (Wikidata:Q11903032), died in 1971. Not in PD. No Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptures, only buildings. Htm (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The uploader claims this image as their own work, but this is almost certainly untrue.

This is a still from film footage of this tornado shot by Bob Dundas. Dundas was an early storm chaser, and worked for KCKT-TV. It is not clear whether this footage belonged to him or his employer. At least one of many transfers of this film to video to digital attributes a copyright to him.[3]; see also other transfers -- [4][5]

Given the formalities required for pre-1989 copyright in the US, it's likely that copyright was lost somewhere along the way for 1974 footage like this which has evidently been widely copied and re-copied.

Nevertheless, "likely" isn't evidence that this is a free image, so I leave it to the uploader or anyone who wants to keep this image here to provide that evidence under COM:ONUS. Rlandmann (talk) 23:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article, totally blurry, nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Elprofesordelengua (talk) 02:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 23.237.216.49 as no permission ( Keep: Public Domain (California Government)) Xeror (talk) 10:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]