Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/06

5 November 2024

7 November 2024

Deletion requests on 6 November 2024

November 6

File:Cloudflare Logo.svg

®ownership 223.231.148.226 03:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

logo is simple geometric shape and text. Andrew nyrtalkcontribs 06:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, valid file, insufficient rationale. ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm skeptical that this logo is really PD even in the U.S., per COM:TOO US. Show me any PD logo that's of comparable complexity to the stylized clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I do see that we haven't really seen stylized clouds before, but I personally don't think TOO is met here as it still is fairly simple. Takipoint123 (💬) 03:31, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Info To closing admin: If this file is to be deleted, this one should be as well. File:Cloudflare Logo.png Takipoint123 (💬) 03:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Капличка поряд.jpg

Also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built in the 2013. No Permission from the sculptor / architect Ihor Hordiy. See also discussion Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Work_of_Ihor_Hordiy Микола Василечко (talk) 06:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eelke Kleijn Press Picture 1.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sahaib as no permission (No permission) Krd 06:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:愛犬のYolkaと.png

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 06:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Franz Höllriegel.png

Kein "eigenes Werk", Quelle unklar. Könnte gemeinfrei sein, was aber zu belegen wäre. GerritR (talk) 06:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tenghua Jiuguan 02 2015-04.JPG

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel 我对删除这些图像没有意见，凡是有条件的，我都会自己画一张取代它（CAD、SKP、Adobe AI、PS这些我也都会用），即使删掉了，我也还会用该文件名再次上传。--猫猫的日记本 (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daffy The Commando.jpg

Because the file has Daffy Duck and the Commons:Character copyrights for Daffy Duck doesn't expire until 2033. Andrek02 (talk) 12:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it is my understanding that under Title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States, copyright protection applies to the entirety of the work in question and cannot be available for designs released to the public that are no longer subject to those protections. Though the character Daffy Duck is admittedly subject to these protections until 2033, all protections provided by law to a work in the public domain would no longer apply when the copyright for the film has expired. In the case of this film, its copyright was not renewed by its copyright holder, United Artists, and expired in 1971. Derivative works featuring the character Daffy Duck would still violate U.S. copyright law, but excerpts of public domain material that are not derivative are not protected by copyright. Paper Luigi (talk) 06:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The video is in the public domain, and therefore all of its stills are also in the public domain. The Supreme Court rejected the above-pressed type of claim in the Dastar case. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:06, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caraça - MG (5236694044).jpg

Visited a museum in my vacations, I'm an intellectual. 186.174.96.77 13:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:বানু শাহ আগার দুর্গের ধ্বংসাবশেষ.jpg

This is not the ruins of Banu Shah Agar Fort. This is an image of the Castle of Montearagón. ফারদিন (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The important issue is copyrights, though. 200.39.139.20 15:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ART-building-15th.jpg

COM:FoP The main subject of this photo is mural, as per "Artists Repertory Theatre's new mural painted by Toma Villa and Blaine Fontana." in description. This is in the US. No Freedom of Panorama for mural. The uploader has no right to release copyright to the mural. Graywalls (talk) 15:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We do have Freedom of Panorama. I am not clear what the issue it since Freedom of Panorama exists in the US. This was a mural that we commissioned to be painted on our building. 50.109.250.73 18:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's incorrect. The main subject of this photo is the mural. You can't take a picture of art someone else created, take picture of it, then claim it as yours. See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Freedom_of_panorama Graywalls (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Прапор хотина Монтажная область 1.svg

Зробив нову версію прапора Potemkovskiy_Vladislav (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fluxograma dos antigos clã's.JPG

If necessary there is a large version. 186.174.114.23 16:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winner Prestasi.jpg

No Freedom of Paronama in Indonesia Baqotun0023 (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Les Privat Winner Prestasi.jpg

No Freedom of Paronama in Indonesia Baqotun0023 (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There is nothing copyrightable here. Whether this is within scope though is another question. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Microsoft Edge Screenshot.png

This file was initially tagged by S99 as Copyvio (copyvio), doesn't appear to include significant coverage of copyrightable parts of the interface Sadads (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, probably OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicolas Matthews.jpg

copyvio: already attributed to someone else: https://www.agenturwindhuis.de/nicolas-matthews/ Känguru1890 (talk) 16:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazembek.webp

Potential copyvio: the Alternate History wiki is certainly not the original source of this photo. As Kazembek was alive until 1977 and it's unclear who took this photo (or when, or even in what country!), we can't be sure of its copyright status. Omphalographer (talk) 17:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Messtischblatt-Ausschnitt Neuötting 1945.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Thgoiter as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not all maps from that source have the right license for Commons. This one is under "CC BY-ND 3.0 DE", see Terms of use (German), section 3.4 |source=https://geoportal.bayern.de/bayernatlas/ Probably PD in Germany. Yann (talk) 18:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Oxwin (talk · contribs)

I initially tagged these as "no source" since almost all of the user's uploads marked as "own work" were obvious web copyvios and these did not appear to be any different (relatively low res, no EXIF data, same license and source info as others). The uploader claims these are their own work.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low res just proves my point further, the other pictures which I stolen (which I apologise for) had high resolution and clear cut evidence that they are from the web. A simple reverse search proves that. However, this is not the case here. I find Mr. Adeletron's evidence to be nothing but just a form of a cognitive bias. Oxwin (talk) 18:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Overwatch Twitter logo.webp

Licensed {{PD-simple}} but I believe the glowing element at the top of the logo and in the text raises this image above the threshold of originality. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a similar concern about File:Overwatch logo icon.webp, though it's less obvious to me. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThis is pretty much just a simple symbol with a glowing effect on top, so it's below the TOO in the United States. Trade (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete symbol is simple geometry; depiction clearly isn’t Dronebogus (talk) 12:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Challenge (2016-.n.v.).png

Copyrighted logo uploader claimed as own work Duke of New Gwynedd (talk) 20:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Meteocat.jpg

logo must be in SVG and logos from Generalitat are not in CC0: https://web.gencat.cat/en/ajuda/avis_legal/index.html Docosong (talk) 20:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danielmoreno4774 (talk · contribs)

I can't find a confirmation that these are PD. The ones from the Agr Ministry are copyright see https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/Paginas/Terminos-y-condiciones-de-uso.aspx#Autorizacion

Gbawden (talk) 14:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Danielmoreno4774 (talk · contribs)

logo must be in SVG & logos from Generalitat de Catalunya are not in CC0: https://web.gencat.cat/en/ajuda/avis_legal/index.html (These elements of corporate identity are the exclusive property of the Generalitat of Catalonia and are protected by the applicable legislation in force.)

Docosong (talk) 20:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Nobel Prize medals

As the header on the category page suggests, the medal is still copyrighted in its home country of Sweden until 2036 inclusive. The only way it could be PD in Sweden is if it counted as a work of applied art, which in my opinion is doubtful for a medal. File:Nobel prize medal for medicine, Sweden, 1945, to Sir Alexander Fleming (1881-1955) who discovered Penicillin. On display at the National Museum of Scotland.jpg was taken in Scotland, but even if generally applicable I doubt British FoP would allow us to display a copyrighted Swedish work.

Felix QW (talk) 20:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the medal itself may be copyrighted but people can still take photos of it if they have access to it. So keep those that are photos of that kind. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would think that photos featuring the Nobel medal too prominently are derivative works of the copyrighted medal, and therefore we require a license for both the medal and the photo. Felix QW (talk) 16:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree. This is just a unicolor medal of simple shapes and simple text. It's debatable whether the medal itself can be copyrighted at all. I think people are also allowed to 3D print it or create exact replicas. In any case, the photo of the medal can be CCBY or PD if the photographer specifies it so. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Felix QW's reasoning would mean that large parts of the content of the Category:Medals tree would have to be deleted, which would of course be absurd. -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 15:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted before, see Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2006/07#Nobel_Prize_and_all_medal_photos_within. Ainali (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid reason for deletion. Prototyperspective (talk) 17:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am afraid Felix QW is correct. This medal is copyrighted in Sweden unless Erik Lindberg waivered his rights to the Nobel Prize Committee, but there is nothing indicating that. /ℇsquilo 10:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The medal yes, but even if they try they can't copyright all photos of it. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:City of Mobile, Alabama logo.jpg

Dubious unsupported license claim, looks to be over TOO. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's unclear to me whether it's over COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Despite how complicated it looks, the symbol at the bottom of the logo is fairly common (although it is usually directed with the point upwards). (It is, among other places, used on the seal of Mobile.) Turning a common design upside-down and putting a letter on top is not sufficiently creative. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So what do you think the proper license would be? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Infrogmation of New Orleans: I’m more active on English Wikisource, so I’m not fully aware of Wikimedia Commons’ specific licenses, but I believe that PD-textlogo would be appropriate. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:34, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:HillJenn.png

The reason stated for it being public domain is clearly false. It was not made before 1929. Furthermore, it is her official government portrait. Hill is a state representative for Michigan, and Michigan does not release government works into the public domain. RoundSquare (talk) 20:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ohemaa Mercy.jpg

Description says that this file was sent to the uploader by this person's publicist. So we need the name and authorization of the real photographer (uploader can't be the author as mentioned).

Furthermore, description says the file must be used "on Wikipedia only". This isn't compatible with the type of licences accepted on Commons (doesn't allow for commercial use for instance). Titlutin (talk) 21:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is why we recommend uploaders go through VRT for works they didn't create themselves. A grant of permission "on Wikipedia only" is grossly insufficient; it doesn't even permit us to use the image on Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 00:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1933 Indian Motoplane bochure.jpg

Also affected: File:1933 Indian Motoplane leaflet.jpg and File:1933 Indian Scout Pony and Motoplane.jpg and File:1933 Indian Scout Pony.jpg Part of a 1933 brochure. If American, it would be public domain if there's no copyright notice in the document itself (I don't see one on page but don't have access to whole document). Abzeronow (talk) 21:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are three other photos of the brochure in the same user's stream on Flickr: 1, 2, 3. The first page confirms that it was "Printed in U.S.A.", and I don't see anything resembling a copyright notice anywhere. Omphalographer (talk) 00:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some good evidence in favor of keeping, if that comprises all of the brochure, it should be kept. Abzeronow (talk) 23:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:9.Moustapha Bey (1835-1837).jpg

This file was initially tagged by R Prazeres as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: User re-uploaded literally the same thing just two hours after the file was speedily deleted, with no explanation or change. Per previous SD nomination: "Clearly not uploader's own work. Seems to be extracted from a low-quality internet source and then possibly manipulated after. No evidence provided of Commons-compatible license. This shows the file to be an older work, but source of this particular file is unclear. Possibly old enough. Yann (talk) 22:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:UraeReKukesit.jpg

how come that the cloud over the mountain and the moon are exactly the same as in this video published by a minister? https://www.instagram.com/pandelimajko/reel/C8q0YtUth_I/ Albinfo (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maanpuolustuksen paasi Sysmä.jpg

Derivative work of Veterans' Memorial, sculpture by Finnish architect unto Ojonen (Wikidata:Q18720067), died in 1997. Not in PD. No Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptures, only buildings. Htm (talk) 23:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Two crude stone slabs with simple writing. This is likely below the threshold of originality. There are more complex plaques on the one of the stone slabs, but they are a very small part of the image at this distance and the detail is obscured, leading this portion to be de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thought this is a border case; I found out much later there is a designer. The plaques are quite common, one kind of logos mostly (as far as I can see).-- Htm (talk) 17:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User WPQC

Originally tagged db-t2 with reason "2=10 years since event happened". Transcluded 27 times. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove transclusions and

Delete. While this is transcluded on some user pages, it's a page of instructions telling the user how to upload photos for a 2012 contest (Commons:Wikipédia prend Québec) - it's not content which ever belonged on a user page. Many, if not all, of the inclusions appear to all have been added by User:Brochon99, not by the owners of the pages, e.g. Special:Diff/71826093, Special:Diff/71826182, Special:Diff/71826225, Special:Diff/71826301, etc. Omphalographer (talk) 00:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I support such treatment. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 01:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danielmoreno4774 (talk · contribs)

I can't find a confirmation that these are PD. The ones from the Agr Ministry are copyright see https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/Paginas/Terminos-y-condiciones-de-uso.aspx#Autorizacion

Gbawden (talk) 14:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Danielmoreno4774 (talk · contribs)

logo must be in SVG & logos from Generalitat de Catalunya are not in CC0: https://web.gencat.cat/en/ajuda/avis_legal/index.html (These elements of corporate identity are the exclusive property of the Generalitat of Catalonia and are protected by the applicable legislation in force.)

Docosong (talk) 20:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/06

November 6

Files uploaded by Oxwin (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Danielmoreno4774 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Danielmoreno4774 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Nobel Prize medals

Files uploaded by Danielmoreno4774 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Danielmoreno4774 (talk · contribs)

Navigation menu

Search