Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/09
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_-_Orange_Oakleaf_Image_page_2024-04-10_at_10.54.32_am.jpg){kind=link}
_without_head_IMG-20240412-WA0025.jpg){kind=link}
October 9
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Part of post-processed images with low resolution and missing EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Part of post-processed images with low resolution and missing EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Part of post-processed images with low resolution and missing EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Part of post-processed images with low resolution and missing EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
White logo, pretty much unusable given the white standard background of all Wikipedia projects. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep I don't think so. Please see Category:White logos. --Tmv (talk) 08:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Tmv: But here, in this specific case, we're talking about an exclusively white logo, not a white + other color logo or a mainly/essentially white logo. 😕🤷♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 08:47, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Εὐθυμένης There are many logos with only the white color (and the transparent background) like File:ACE logo.png, File:Logo of Lynn Family Stadium.png, File:AmeriCorps Logo 2020 Stacked White.svg etc.
There are also black versions, so these logos I mentioned to are completely the same cases.Tmv (talk) 09:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Sorry the black version for File:Image d55b2730.png is only on the frwiki. But that doesn't change what I mean. --Tmv (talk) 09:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Εὐθυμένης There are many logos with only the white color (and the transparent background) like File:ACE logo.png, File:Logo of Lynn Family Stadium.png, File:AmeriCorps Logo 2020 Stacked White.svg etc.
- @Tmv: But here, in this specific case, we're talking about an exclusively white logo, not a white + other color logo or a mainly/essentially white logo. 😕🤷♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 08:47, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm not really sure if the text that is present on this leaflet could be considered as being copyrights free or not, especially since it's not one of your "usual" short political slogans, but more like a whole (party) statement regarding internal-external politicy matters. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
File:President Biden and President Luis Abinader of the Dominican Republic before the first Americas Partnership Leaders' Summit.jpg
[edit]
Duplicate of File:P20231102AS-0398.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The file is unused. As we have better images about that, in my opinion the file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Potentially useful. INUSE. Not accepted as dupe until you point a better image. I reduced the bloat by factor 4.5, problem solved. Delete Commons:Deletion requests/File:World jpg.jpg instead. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Probably wrong license: author's name is identical to the name of the person shown, but the photo does not look like a selfie. Wikisaurus (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation Saya χαῖρε 12:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Outdated information Coolmaster69 (talk) 13:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Speedy keep Blatantly invalid deletion request. File has ca 2'000 globas uses. Rename to File:Emblem of West Bengal (Banglarmukh) before 2018.png instead. Bad history: his log log Taylor 49 (talk) 17:51, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment After ca 10 attempts with wild errors I succeeded to rename the file. -- Special:GlobalUsage/..West_Bengal_Flag(INDIA).png -- en:Emblem_of_West_Bengal -- en:File:Emblem_of_West_Bengal_(2018-present).svg deleted here Commons:Deletion requests/Emblem of West Bengal -- Taylor 49 (talk) 18:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment All over 2000 uses switched over to the new name. The redirect can be safely deleted, the file must not. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
_before_2018.png){kind=link}
_before_2018.png&action=history){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by User:Rikieboy1
[edit]
These are both copyright violations. The uploader incorrectly uses the Template:PD-US-1978-89 but both files were published with copyright notice. See here (detail) and here (detail). I nominated another of his uploads separately here for the same reason before realizing this was a pattern. --Denniscabrams (talk) 13:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Likely a copyrighted statue. The memorial park where it is located was opened in 2017, so it is unlikely that the sculptor has been dead for more than 50 years. Nepal does not provide Freedom of Panorama, so we cannot host this image here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- The statue is certainly modern so if your understanding of Nepali law is correct it may be it has to be deleted. MarkTemple (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article VojtaaZ (talk) 15:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
extremely bad quality, wobbly, not in use. MeAmME (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The only uploader's file, survived Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Umberto Cascone. Probably not own work also, but taken from Vittoria's Instagram: [1] Quick1984 (talk) 15:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
![[1]](https://static2.amica.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/IMG_8330.jpg?v=1052850_1608720802){kind=link}
- @RoyZuo and P199: as involved users. --Quick1984 (talk) 16:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Of course. i saw no reason why that could be kept, but mileage varies. RoyZuo (talk) 19:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Als Lizenz wird hier gemeinfrei genannt. Laut genannter Quelle ist die Lizenz Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic also NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes . AxelHH (talk) 16:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- It would be expired in the EU no matter what license it was released under. For instance I may release an image here under a CC license but once it passes into the public domain (95 years after publication or 70 years pma), there is no longer a legal requirement to adhere to the terms of the CC license. --RAN (talk) 19:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- 1932+95= 2027. --AxelHH (talk) 20:33, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wings position of Kallima inachus (Doyère, 1840) - Orange Oakleaf Image page 2024-04-10 at 10.54.32 am.jpg
[edit]_-_Orange_Oakleaf_Image_page_2024-04-10_at_10.54.32_am.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Orange_Oakleaf_Image_page_2024-04-10_at_10.54.32_am.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Rimi Butterfly (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
_without_head_IMG-20240412-WA0025.jpg){kind=link}
_without_head_IMG-20240412-WA0025.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Rimi Butterfly (talk) 16:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
_without_head_IMG-20240412-WA0025.jpg){kind=link}
If this logo is not supposed to reach a level of creativity, then presumably nothing has any level of creativity at all. Stepro (talk) 16:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep kann sein, kann nicht sein. Die Quelle hat überhaupt keine Lizenz und keinen Urheber. Aber sicher kein Löschgrund. Ralf Roletschek 13:59, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Dupe, unused, BAD JPG, there is File:World img.png with same size and better quality. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ələmdar Cəfərov
[edit]Two copies of the same image uploaded in the same week, the first very clearly a photograph of a printed image, and the second looking like a scan of it where the paper isn't flat. The source of the original photograph is not given.
Belbury (talk) 18:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
non-free image, copied from enwp (where it is tagged non-free), dubious own work claim Fastily 19:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The license has been changed to {{PD-India}}. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Previously published at https://friars.com/facilities/chapey-field-at-anderson-stadium/14. The .webp file format suggests this fiile is a web download, not an original photo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi Adeletron 3030. I work at providence college and have permission to use the image. We do not have the original file anymore so we don't know who took it, thus I claimed as my own as I have nobody to attribute it to. Thank you for your efforts to protect copyrighted material but there is no issue from the college's point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nateplanes (talk • contribs) 12:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Nateplanes Thank you for your response and explaining the situation. Previously published photos require license verification via COM:VRT. Please have someone who can act as a representative at the college provide the copyright release statement by email or using the form at COM:VRT/CONSENT. Thank you! Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:41, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jlwoodwa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://beaconchurchpheasey.com/ Probably PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 19:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The resolution is too high and not adapted to the size of the text. The map is not readable as is. I have a valid export of this map to upload with a more reasonable resolution. Aetsibb (talk) 19:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ariadnaroca1995 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files were uploaded as "own work" but have Exif metadata with two different names, suggesting that they're a copyright violation, or at least non-free. File:FREE Andy Scott Giant Bear Sculpture Dunbar MED RES 01.jpg and File:Andy Scott Giant Bear Sculpture Dunbar .jpg have an Exif author of "Colin Hattersley", while File:Visitors at the opening of LOVE Gorgie Farm on February 2020.jpg has an Exif author of "Ian Georgeson". Maybe these are both names used by Ariadnaroca1995, but it seems unlikely. File:FREE Andy Scott Giant Bear Sculpture Dunbar MED RES 01.jpg has an Exif image title that ends "**FREE Picture - FIRST USE ONLY** - within 30 days of origination of photography; all other publications to be paid for - please contact photographer for details.", which isn't an adequately free licence for Commons. File:Visitors at the opening of LOVE Gorgie Farm on February 2020.jpg has Exif usage terms saying "Editorial Free First Use, Further permission for future use must be agreed with Ian Georgeson Photography", which is similarly not adequately free. File:Andy Scott Giant Bear Sculpture Dunbar .jpg has no licensing information in Exif.
- File:FREE Andy Scott Giant Bear Sculpture Dunbar MED RES 01.jpg
- File:Andy Scott Giant Bear Sculpture Dunbar .jpg
- File:Visitors at the opening of LOVE Gorgie Farm on February 2020.jpg
bjh21 (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
1906 postcard from French photographer and editor Francis Barnaud of Laon. I cannot find a death date for Barnaud, and 1906 is too young to assume Barnaud died before 1954. Abzeronow (talk) 22:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Wstawię nowy i lepszy Lech Darski 22:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
A 2024 image is most certainly not {{PD-Italy}}. MKFI (talk) 12:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination on further investigation it looks like another user had changed the license: Revision #934956810. MKFI (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept, Nomination withdrawn. MKFI (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Not own work but from Facebook 181.203.28.41 23:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide a link to the facebook page where the image was? Or were you basing this on the metadata having the "FBMD" information? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)