User talk:Yeagvr
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 22:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
File:EmisKilla2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ErikvanB (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:DORAEMON il film.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:DORAEMON il film.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:DORAEMON il film.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 18:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Verhekst logo
[edit]Hi JackLantern. You also put this image on nl-wiki without a proper license. The file has been deleted because of copyright violation. Would you please read the FAQ before uploading any files next time? Thank you. ErikvanB (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Alberto Di Chiara.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Målfarlig! (talk) 22:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Sam&Cat logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Castillo blanco (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Touchwiz 6.0.1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Larryasou (talk) 06:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Windows Contacts Logo.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Windows Contacts Logo.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Windows Contacts Logo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Collage George Floyd protests.png
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Collage George Floyd protests.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
BevinKacon (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Rai 4 HD Logo 2016.png has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed.
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Please provides a source or sources for the date used for this. It's in danger of being removed from the "Right-wing populism" article on en.wiki. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Supranational European Bodies-it2.svg requires updating
[edit]Hi Yeagvr,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Supranational European Bodies-it2.svg is out of date. Russia is no longer a member of Council of Europe Could you update it? Thanks again. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
File:Right-wing populist parties in European national parliaments (October 2019).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Remains of WTC3 after 9-11.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Remains of WTC3 after 9-11.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Remains of WTC3 after 9-11.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ringerfan23 (talk) 01:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
File:WTC 21-632.TIFF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Inomyabcs (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Renames of Forts
[edit]Hi. Thanks for taking on updating category names. I'm not sure I agree with removing old Fort names from description and titles though. Obama did not visit Fort Liberty, he visited Fort Bragg. My opinion is that titles and descriptions should remain unchanged. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 20:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Richardkiwi: and @Poudou99: since they've renamed some files. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I reverted a few renames, but one failed. The title was so short that I (accidentally) copied both titles.. So please request the files that should have the old name, if there are still files left I didn't rename all of them. I saw that changes were made to the category by very experienced users and other things, so I thought the requests were good. Thanks, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'm following up with a topic on the Village Pump to get more opinions on this: Commons:Village pump#Fort Bragg → Fort Liberty. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I reverted a few renames, but one failed. The title was so short that I (accidentally) copied both titles.. So please request the files that should have the old name, if there are still files left I didn't rename all of them. I saw that changes were made to the category by very experienced users and other things, so I thought the requests were good. Thanks, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Nastya by Jorit.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nastya by Jorit.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nastya by Jorit.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jaqen (talk) 07:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz portrait.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz portrait.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz portrait.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz portrait.jpg
[edit]
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Map of Russia - North Caucasus economic region (2018, Crimea included).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vital1708 (talk) 08:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Firema T67 linea 6 Napoli.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GaeC86 (talk) 17:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stazione Università L1 Napoli.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Stazione Università L1 Napoli.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stazione Università L1 Napoli.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Sign advertising 'Maradona Spritz' for upcoming F.C. Napoli match in Naples, Italy (53571852687).jpg
[edit]File:Sign advertising 'Maradona Spritz' for upcoming F.C. Napoli match in Naples, Italy (53571852687).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Napoli Airport logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glrx (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
deletion
[edit]hi, raster files should not be deleted, they should be kept as source, there are millions of doubles (raster+svg-pairs) - this is common sense --Mrmw (talk) 07:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)