User talk:Wilson44691

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wilson44691!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}}
  • For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Sdrtirs (talk) 04:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"File:GabbroRockCreek2.jpg"

[edit]

Hi Wilson, I removed the cat Igneous rocks from the file:GabbroRockCreek2.jpg, as it already is in the cat Gabbro samples, which is an undercat of Gabbro, which is an undercat of Igneous rocks. I noticed you changed it back again, but as I found it is best to place files only in very specific subcats and leave the main cats empty, I request you to undo this again. Greetings, --Satrughna (talk) 12:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geological Monuments of India

[edit]

Dear Mr Wilson,

I have seen some nice photos of Geology of Chennai posted by you. I am now writing articles in Wikipedia on Geological Monuments of India. The offically declared (by GSI) monuments are 26 numbers spread all over India; ten of them in Rajasthan alone, four in Karnataka and three each Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.I have already posted articles in wikipedia on St. Mary's Islands, Karnataka on Columnar Basalts, Borra Caves, Bugle Rock, Natural Arch, Tirumala hills, and Lonar Lake. I am in the process of finalising the article on Charnockite, St. Thomas Mount in Chennai, and Peninsular Gneiss in Bangalore, Karnataka. In case you have some photos of these geological formations taken at the locations mentioned, would it be possible for you to upload them on Wikicommons for use in articles. If you have covered the Geology of Rajasthan, some photos of the same would also be useful.The web address where you can see the list of National Geological Monumnets of India is at http://www.gsi.gov.in/geotour/geofrm2.htm, Geological Monuments of India. It would be nice if you give me a reply. Thank you.--Nvvchar (talk) 06:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified cat

[edit]

Hello Wilson,
File:GorgonianHoldfastMiocene.JPG and File:Syringoporid.jpg cannot stay directly under Category:Cnidaria. That would mean that they represent all the Cnidaria group (See the schema File:Cnidaria medusa n polyp.png that does). Your pictures should be in a species category (or in none if they are referenced in an article: see article/category war) or in an "Unidentified XX" category. Don't take it badly (I also have plenty of files in those cat ;-)), Unidentified only means that the species is unknown. Which is really the case for your 2 pictures. Some contributors look inside those categories and try to identify those pictures.

By the way, I moved File:GorgonianHoldfastMiocene.JPG to Category:Unidentified Gorgonacea but could you help me with File:Syringoporid.jpg ? What is a Syringoporid ? Is it a taxon ?
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 06:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Liné1 -- I would think that images inside Cnidaria would not "represent all the Cnidaria group" but simply be examples. Nevertheless, I have few opinions about categories so please do what you need to do for your classification system. Syringoporid corals are in the Family Syringoporidae of the Order Tabulata. Good luck with your work! Wilson44691 (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Wilson Liné1 (talk) 14:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wilson44691, would you have time to look at Brachiopod. I've done the first pass through the main content, and will look again in a week to see if I see errors, poor phrasing, etc. Then I'll use a couple of tools to check URLs and DABs. Finally I'd write the lead - that way it is sure to match the main text. ---- Philcha (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, Philcha -- I'll look over it this evening. I've been watching it over the past few weeks and have had no problems at all with most changes. Wilson44691 (talk) 23:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I went over the first half and made several small copy-edits. Minor issues I didn't touch you can think about: (1) The objection by some paleontologists and biologists to the "dorsal" and "ventral" terms for the valves is usually because in life the pedunculate brachiopods can have either valve "up"; (2) I wouldn't say, "The fossil brachiopod genera have great diversity but only a few skeletal characteristics ..."; the brachiopod Treatise volumes have many, many pages of skeletal term definitions. I'll get to the second half later. I think it is a good article that is much better than it was a few months ago.Wilson44691 (talk) 01:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:TallinnWarMemorial2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Hluup (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FOP problems

[edit]

Professor Wilson:
I just posted  Delete at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TallinnWarMemorial2009.JPG. When I see a problem file nominated for deletion, I often look at the uploader's other work to see if there are problems -- while this certainly doesn't feel good to you, it is a way to root out systematic issues. Could I suggest that you take a hard look at your images of recent buildings and sculpture from Argentina, the UK (only the murals), Estonia, Lithuania, and Russia? I think you will want to tag a number of them with {{Copyvio}}. If it's any small comfort, a side benefit of doing this was that I had to research FOP in the Bahamas and add that section to the Commons article on FOP. As you will see, you're OK there. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 14:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jim. I will do so after I return from travels -- or get another online chance at it. Thank you for being thorough.Wilson44691 (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, for a positive response -- I always dread giving users a list of problems -- and for all your good images. There's no rush. Any questions, you know where to find help. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 15:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Lubianka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fernrohr (talk) 19:32, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SaltCrystalCasts.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.155.241 13:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skerry

[edit]

Do you have a specific geotag for this skerry in Åland? Heyzeuss (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. Wilson44691 (talk) 13:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Wilson44691!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note - I had looked at the pic closely; the foliage at the top right is clearly attached to the branch of the "dead" tree (so it still has living wood round the rear side), and for confirmation, the front side of the trunk and the top left branch still have some bark remaining, which is clearly juniper bark from its 'stringy' character, quite unlike Pinus flexilis bark. I'm familiar with both species, have studied them in the Sierra Nevada. Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 09:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that is convincing, especially that bit of bark. Thanks for the correction! Wilson44691 (talk) 09:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I use one of your photos

[edit]

Hi Mark!

I have use a photo of Camelus dromedarius in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directy in the follow link and in the tree nexts:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=32770

If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Mark%20A.%20Wilson

This is my "contributor card", for example: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn


In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón --Fernando.lison (talk)

Glad you find my photo useful, Fernando! Wilson44691 (talk)
Thanks again, Mark. Can I use your profile in your user page for your "contributor card" in Animalandia? ¿Any photo of you, please? --Fernando.lison (talk)
Sure you can use the info. No photo, though. Wilson44691 (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Mark. --Fernando.lison (talk)

Thanks for uploading your geology photos

[edit]

I have enjoyed looking at your geological photos. They are a very nice collection and Wikipedia is much richer for having them. As a contributor to Wikipedia geology articles, I know that I shall regularly check them to see if I can include them in any articles. Thanks for the wonderful resource. I have added various categories to some of the geology photos, which I hope will help to widen their accessibility. GeoWriter (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for all your work in return! It is a fun process. Best Wishes Wilson44691 (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kurgans in Staraya Ladoga

[edit]

i would like to ask you about the burial mound of Oleg of Novgorod. Was it excavated and opened? how do we know he is buried there. and who is the oldest russian leader that is burial place is known? do we have clue where Rurik is buried? thank you, Rakoon (talk) 13:14, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. That burial mound photographed was excavated many years ago. I had heard that a body and various implements were found, but no confirmation that it was actually Oleg. All I know! Wilson44691 (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Statue

[edit]

Hi. Per the note I left on the relevant talk page, I think there is some confusion about which of the (several) Aodh Ó Domhnaill's is represented in that statue. You've added it to various articles about Aodh Rua Ó Dónaill (1572-1602). But the base of the statue states "1427-1505". Either Donegal County Council, and the Flight of the Earls commemoration people, and the artist all get it very (very) wrong, or you've misascribed this image to the wrong man. I believe the man depicted in the statue is an ancestor. Names (and personal traits like red hair) are commonly handed down. Dates and years of birth are less flexible. Guliolopez (talk) 20:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes. Thanks! I'm very certain the error comes from my jet-lagged mind. I'm on it! Wilson44691 (talk) 21:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:SakharovUnivStPetersburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rd232 (talk) 23:54, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 22:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Wilson44691 (talk) 22:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

For these gorgeous fossil and geology photos -- I was reading up on some topics related to my job as a librarian (newly responsible for geology) and came across your work. Thank you! -- Phoebe (talk) 21:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Phoebe, for taking the time to send me this kind note! Cheers, Wilson44691 (talk) 21:51, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nominations

[edit]

Amongst your pictures, the following have been nominated for deletion because of copyviolation:

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bronze Soldier of Tallinn for details.

My condolences, --Pildirüüstaja (talk) 21:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and a cross-ref

[edit]

I've seen your images, but never bothered to go to the source. Wow, lots! High-quality, too. Thanks for contributing.

In case you haven't seen them, or met him, here are James St. John's free-licensed geology/paleo photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jsjgeology/sets/

He's a colleague, fairly nearby at OSU's Newark campus. If you two haven't met, you should....

Best wishes, Pete Tillman (talk) 21:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC), a Western mining geologist[reply]

Thanks, Pete! I appreciate your compliment. As for James St. John, I know him well -- I was his undergraduate advisor! He's a good man with excellent images. Cheers, Wilson44691 (talk) 23:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Heh -- small world. JSJ does have a sharp eye, steady hand & amazing energy -- ah, youth! Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 20:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your "Chionodoxa" image

[edit]

Hi, I suspect the very nice photo you added to the Chionodoxa article is actually Crocus tommasinianus – see Category:Crocus tommasinianus. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Peter! My error. Thanks for quickly cleaning up after me. Wilson44691 (talk) 23:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 10:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boxelder bug or Small Milkweed bug?

[edit]

I have requested that File:Mating Small Milkweed bugs Lygaeus kalmii.jpg be renamed. According to this discussion and this IP editor they are Small Milkweed bugs. Hope I'm not making a mistake. SpinningSpark 17:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certainly OK with this renaming. Wilson44691 (talk) 23:22, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dino track near St. George -- thanks

[edit]

Added your fine footprint foto, File:Gigandipus.JPG to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._George_Dinosaur_Discovery_Site. Which is on my life-list now.

We even considered St. George when we were looking for a retirement place, years ago. Long before this place opened. Time for another visit. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 17:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! St. George is a beautiful place, especially for the geology. Wilson44691 (talk) 01:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]
File:File-Kitten in a helmet.jpg

I stumbled on one of your pictures from Svalbard, and looking at your whole collection of what you've contributed is impressive!

Thrawn 21 (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Wilson44691 (talk) 22:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Museum of Occupations071011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Erodium cicutarium?

[edit]

Hi Wilson, I wondered if this is really Erodium cicutarium (see here: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redaktion_Biologie/Bestimmung#Erodium_cicutarium_? ). There they came to the conclusion that it more likely is Erodium crassifolium. So how sure are you that it is Erodium cicutarium? Maybe you have more pictures of that plant?

Best regards --Bruder Vio (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bruder Vio. I'll leave it to you to correct this identification as you think best! Thanks, Wilson44691 (talk) 23:19, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 00:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LingulaanatinaAA.JPG

[edit]

Hi Wilson44691, on the picture https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dd/LingulaanatinaAA.JPG is there only lingulata or is there other thing on the right like a sea worm, a sea cucumber https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_cucumber holothurie ? If it is sure it should be good to specify this here https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingulata in the subtitle of the photo, isn't it ? Greatings. (Sorry for my bad english ! I'm french) --92.94.110.191 16:58, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. That image shows an entire lingulid, from pedicle to shell, and nothing else.Wilson44691 (talk) 18:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you.--92.94.110.191 22:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:City of Rocks NR view 072617.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: It is available in another site which is this one source=
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Yitbe.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect. I took this photo myself. The other site is using it FROM Wikimedia. Wilson44691 (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution

[edit]

You have an impressive collection of photos. Thank you your your time and effort. Philkon (talk) 00:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Phil Konstantin[reply]

Thank you very much, Phil. Very kind of you! Wilson44691 (talk) 12:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree; It was your Silurian crinoid photo that first drew me in. 24.78.190.118 01:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 05:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]