User talk:Williamsongate~commonswiki
 First steps tutorialOur first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
Filnik 19:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Munilla_con_el_Papa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Martin H. (talk) 01:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, you answered on my userpage - please use the discussionpage of my request for comments. I transfered your comment there. --Martin H. (talk) 11:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:General Queipo.jpg
[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:General Queipo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 00:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:JAPdR.jpg
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:JAPdR.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rastrojo (D•ES) 20:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Dale a español, y deja de subir imágenes con origen incierto, por favor. Saludos Rastrojo (D•ES) 21:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
RE: Falange
[edit]If you are refering to File:Bandera FE JONS.svg, I changed it because the old one was inaccurate, as can be seen by the example at Flags of the World. Mnmazur (talk)
- Hmm, I see the version you posted has a darker red, but it still has several different details missing from the dark red version here on Wikimedia. I'll see what I can do. Mnmazur (talk)
- Fixed color according to http://imagenes.solostocks.com/z11799648/bandera-de-la-falange.jpg but maintained details such as the black "holes" in the center insignia that were not included in the old version. Mnmazur (talk)
Foto cuadro JAPdR
[edit]La saqué del Google, pero si te molesta pues la quitas y dejamos el tema sin fotos, sería la octava foto q me quitan. --Willyvice (talk) 18:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Heraldica Española
[edit]Gracias por el mensaje, tienes razón con lo del escudo de Navarra pero el usuario Adelbrecht ya ha creado los escudos históricos de la Navarra integrada en España (borbónico, II República y Franquismo) con el estilo que estoy utilizando (también están disponibles con el estilo del Taller de heráldica). Como ya existen no debo duplicarlos e incluirlos en mi galería personal pero sí que voy a incluirlos en la galería correspondiente [1].
En cuanto al escudo de Borbón-Parma sí que pensé en hacerlo, pero como verás hay muchos ficheros que cargar con las Reales Academias, variantes institucionales y las FF.AA. El problema es que si realizo ese escudo también tendría que hacer los de Borbón-Dos Sicilias y Ducado de Módena borbónico. También hay que tener en cuenta que como reinaron casi dos siglos no hay un único escudo por rama (creo que sólo en Parma hay por lo menos dos). Como verás es mucho trabajo y no puedo dedicarme a todo. Decidí hacer las variantes italianas cuando reinaban los reyes de España allí y las de Carlos III porque, aunque reinó separadamente en Italia, al final también lo hizo en España. Un saludo --Heralder (talk) 12:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Ornamented Royal Coat of Arms of Portugal (Philip I).svg was uncategorized on 10 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Le blason des Ducs de Parme
[edit]Which coat of arms Borbón-Parma do you need? They have quite a few different arms. Adelbrecht (talk) 09:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
I can't see clearly what the third order is. Do you know which order it is? Adelbrecht (talk) 12:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Sur Parma-Busset
[edit]Monsieur, je sais un peu de français, excusez-moi. Je sais que la source de ce blason, 
. Vous ne dites rien sur l'origine ou le lieu où est le blason. Pouvez-vous informer-moi sur la histoire? Merci beaucoup --Williamsongate (talk) 21:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ces blasons sont sur le faire-part de leur mariage. J'ai vu ce faire part dans une vitrine de librairie pour livres anciens, à Paris, dans le Palais-Royal. Bien cordialement. --Aubisse (talk) 14:07, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
RE:Two Americans kingdoms
[edit]These seem to be rather ornamental, and also out of my usual scopes. When university starts again, I'll see if I can find something about the heraldic evolution of these countries in the library. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Rey Católico y Camoens
[edit]Muchas gracias por su mensaje y por la cita, que no conocía. Ando liado con el conjunto militar que parece no tener fin, pero le agradezco su ofrecimiento porque me interesan mucho las variantes de los escudos reales, le avisaré cuando encuentre hueco. Miraré también lo del adjetivo de mi página, pensé que lo menos polémico sería tener un criterio geográfico, pero como dice también es discutible. Saludos--Heralder (talk) 13:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Williamsongate. Please fix your errors. --Leyo 23:22, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, no problem.--Williamsongate (talk) 23:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Don't you check your edits? This made it even worse. --Leyo 23:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Williamsongate. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Williamsongate~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
06:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Francia Catolica.JPG
[edit]
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Francia Catolica.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Francia Catolica.JPG]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
—Odysseus1479 (talk) 19:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
|
File:Obispo Munilla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Macucal (talk) 00:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Iceta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Macucal (talk) 00:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 |
File:Iceta.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|