User talk:Wefo
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 07:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Please link images
[edit]
Hello!
Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. EugeneZelenko 15:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- My English is very poor, and I'm not determined to look up the spelling. I appreciate any visuable correction whithout looking up for changes (nobody would be better in doing almost nothing than me).
- Actually there are two related notices on my page concerning two groops of pictures:
- One groop concerns the topic “Signalabtastung” (not meaning “sampling”, but meaning “continuous reading”) in analog TV. The artikel in the german Wiki had been deleted. Somebody moved these pictures to commons.
- The other concerns the dictionary of 1910. As far as I am concerned, it seems to me that this dictionary is a valuable document of pronounciation and thinking, also about the definition of terms. I'm not able to decide the question of rights for the whole work.
- But there are another two groops: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Wefo/Taschen-Lexikon_des_allgemeinen_Wissens_von_Daniel_Sanders and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GesNat000Titel.jpg?uselang=de%7C15px%7C, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GesNat000Titel.jpg?uselang=de%7C15px%7C#cite_note-GesNat-0 (this shorter link was red, one of the problems that worked in the german version). Every groop contains about 500 pictures.
- Discussions in the german Wiki did not lead to any possibility for creating an artikel as there is an example for the first groop. The second groop was moved but there is no solution anywhere. I created a construction using refs for having the text in an electronic format. I rejected the moving because it seems, that the german Text is somehow difficult for English speaking people. This may be an error. Possible I can get the needed help in commons or in the English version. -- Wefo (talk) 13:04, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Muret-Sanders000.jpg was uncategorized on 16 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Muret-Sanders000VII.jpg was uncategorized on 16 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Muret-Sanders000III.jpg was uncategorized on 16 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Muret-Sanders000I.jpg was uncategorized on 16 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Gluehlanpe doppelt matt.JPG was uncategorized on 6 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:SowjetischerChampagner.JPG was uncategorized on 26 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Ein ähnliches Bild ist http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Cobemckoe_Ulaunahckoe.JPG. Das hat keine Kategorie und einen für meine Begriffe erstaunlichen Titel. Category:Champagne advertisements passt eigentlich nicht, aber so sei es. -- Wefo (talk) 14:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Neue Allotria
[edit]Hallo Wefo, bitte trage in der Information-box unter "date" das Datum der ersten Veröffentlichung des Buches ein, nicht wann Du die Datei hochgeladen hast. Das Originaldatum entscheidet schließlich über das Urheberrecht. Gruß, De728631 (talk) 23:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- So schlau bin ich nicht, denn — wie Du den Abbildungen entnehmen kannst - ist das Erscheinungsjahr nicht angegeben. Weil sich die Lizenz auf den Tod des Autors bezieht, scheint mir das Erscheinungsjahr nicht wirklich relevant. Das Buch wurde zu Weihnachten 1914 verschenkt, aber das scheint mir ebenfalls unerheblich. Die Links in der dt. WP scheinen mir nicht hilfreich zu sein, vielleicht bin ich nicht fähig, sie zu nutzen. Wäre ich fähiger, könnte ich mir vielleicht die ganze Reproduktion sparen. Ich habe leider auch vergessen, wie man die Kat anlegt, obwohl mir das schon einmal gelungen ist. Gruß -- Wefo (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Und um die verschiedenen Seiten zusammenzufassen, gibt es auch eine Vorlage: {{BookNaviBar}}. So kann man dann das ganze Buch durchblättern. De728631 (talk) 23:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Gibt es ein Muster der Anwendung? Vielleicht ist es besser, als meine Methode hier und bei GesNat. -- Wefo (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:AngelikaKaufmann.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:AngelikaKaufmann.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Answered on User talk:Jarekt -- Wefo (talk) 00:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Wefo. You have new messages at Jarekt#Angelika_Kaufmann's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
--Jarekt (talk) 04:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Stamp Albert Einstein 2005br.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |