User talk:UgoEmme
 First steps tutorialOur first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi UgoEmme,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi UgoEmme,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi UgoEmme,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Obvious error
[edit]Please don't add the Czech town Pardubice to Crimea-related categories. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Categories about Lublin
[edit]Hello. May I ask why you are choosing a random month of a random year and then create categories like Category:July 2014 in Lublin, Category:October 2014 in Lublin, Category:June 2016 in Lublin and Category:December 2016 in Lublin, with 1 (in words: one!) file in each of those? That just complicates the category tree, wastes time of a person trying to find photos from a selected year and simply makes a mess. It could make sense to split years into months (all of them, not just some totally random ones) if we had more than a dozen dozen files each year, but in case of Lublin – we do not. Regards, PiotrekD (talk) 10:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Can you answer the question? PiotrekD (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Inizialmente ho privilegiato le immagini sui trasporti (Category: buses, trolleybuses)! Ciao.
Immagini di Genova categorizzate per mese e anno
[edit]Ciao, su modello di quanto accade per altre città ho creato un template per le categorie di Genova per mese e anno. L'uso in queste categorie è visibile qui.--Arbalete (talk) 07:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Category:Buses_routes_numbered_28 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 12:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Errata-corrige:
UgoEmme (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Piazza ed edifici sulla piazza
[edit]Ciao, non devi aggiungere la categoria di una piazza a foto di edifici che sono già categorizzati per edificio e la cui categoria di edificio è contenuta in quella della piazza. Per fare un esempio più semplice se una foto è nella categoria "Italia" non va messa anche la categoria "Europa", perché la categoria Italia è già contenuta in quella dell'Europa. Chiaro? Grazie --Sailko (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 | Category:Bus line 445 (Seattle) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Palosirkka (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
| Category:Buses in the United State built in 1959 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Palosirkka (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
| Category:Buses in United States by year of manufacture is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Palosirkka (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
| Category:Campo San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Palosirkka (talk) 09:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
| Category:Buses routes numbered 28 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Palosirkka (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Too-small categories
[edit]Please do not create categories that have only one file, as categories so very small are not helpful. The Category:2018 in trolleybus transport in Rimini, and the same ones for Cagliari and Roma each contain just 1 file. Even your parent category for the entire country, Category:2018 in trolleybus transport in Italy, has a total of only 3 files – for a country that had about 15 trolleybus systems in 2018. "By year" categories containing just 1–3 files are generally not helpful, and they force the user to look at several tiny categories separately, when the user more likely wants to see all 2018 trolleybus-related images from Italy on a single page (when there are fewer than, say, 20 or 30 images), so that the images can be easily compared. It is better to wait until there are many images for a specific city before creating a sub-category for that city that is also very narrow in other ways (covering only trolleybus transport, and only 2018). Steve Morgan (talk) 08:27, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- Troverò altri files da aggiungere appena possibile! Ti saluto cordialmente. UgoEmme (talk) 13:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Citybus_Route_82P has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
ThirdThink (talk) 13:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Be careful what you remove
[edit][1], [2]: if you want to add to a description, that's fine, but please do not remove reasonable descriptions written by active editors. - Jmabel ! talk 15:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Chinese_New_Year_Seattle_2009_-_04.jpg&diff=708397044&oldid=332306378){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Chinese_New_Year_Seattle_2009_-_08.jpg&diff=708397748&oldid=470589406){kind=link}
| Category:Number 9418 on signs is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Prototyperspective (talk) 11:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Please stop adding bus pictures to Category:Automobiles in Hong Kong
[edit]That category is specifically for cars only. There is another category specifically for buses, see Category:Buses in Hong Kong. Thank you. User3204 17:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
| Category:Buses in Catalonia photographed in the 1900s is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |