User talk:Sums
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image deletion warning | Image:Nofels.2004.panorama.gegen_schweizer_berge.2.reduziert.738x300.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Sums (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- I am Sums, I have made and uploaded the images and I have asked for deletion. I recommend to delete / clean.
- Ich bin Sums, habe die Bilder gemacht und raufgeladen und selbst Löschung beantragt. Ich empfehle Entfernung / Aufräumaktion.
- Der Löschkasten wurde für ein und dasselbe Bild insgesamt 4x automatisch generiert (vermutlich durch "zurück" im IE Browser). In Summe geht's aktuell nur um total 2 Bilder. --Sums (talk) 19:23, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- 3 von total 4 automatisch generierten, identischen Löschinfoboxen entfernt. --Sums (talk) 12:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Nofels.2006.von_daetzen.gegen_osten.panorama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Sums (talk) 16:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- Same as for for other image above. Gleiches wie für Bild oben. --Sums (talk) 19:28, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Deletion requests
[edit]I have made the images and I have asked for deletion. Please delete. --62.47.230.241 18:56, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- Das war ich selbst! That was me! --Sums (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry - Missing licence added, solved --Sums (talk) 01:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Nofels.ehem._Bad_Nofels.Postkarte.um_1900.scan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Lupo 08:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- {{PD-self}} was wrong per misunderstanding, sorry. Replaced with correct license {{PD-old}}. See also its entry. --Sums (talk) 12:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Nofels.Postkarte.Ansicht_um_1900.vor_1.Weltkrieg.scan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Lupo 08:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- {{PD-self}} was wrong per misunderstanding, sorry. Replaced with correct license {{Anonymous-EU}}. See also its entry. --Sums (talk) 12:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Veitskapf
[edit]Nachdem die Schlacht immer nach Tosters lokalisiert wird - was logisch ist, weil die Ill wohl ein großes Hindernis darstellte - habe ich das Denkmal nach Tosters verbunden. Ich hatte schon versucht, die exakten Grenzen der Fraktionen auf dem Ardetzenberg zu erkunden, wäre auch möglich, dass das (der?) Veitskapf zu Feldkirch gehört. Gruß (brunosimonsara) --Welleschik (talk) 17:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hallo Brunosimonsara, ich finde auch, es passt in jedem Fall zu Tosters. Siehe aber auch meine Ergänzung in de:Diskussion:Tosters. LG --Sums (talk) 11:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)