User talk:Shizhao/2005

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello and welcome to the commons!

Would it be possible that you don´t use non-specific names as Image:02a.jpg, please have a look at Commons:Language policy. Much better is a good and specific name for every picture, for example Japanese_Monk_01.jpg etc. But I don´t know if it is a monk of course ... ;-)

Greetings from :Bdk: 17:51, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)


Hello, two of my images were nominated at Template:Featured_pictures_candidates,_list and you tagged them "oppose". While this is perfectly OK for me (I did not nominated the images ;-) ) I would like to know the reason to make my images better in future. Would you be able to add a short remark? Many thanks Tillea 14:32, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I added source and copyright/public domain information for the image Image:Watershed.png you recently edited. The image comes from a public report released by the Sloughhouse Resource Conservation District hosted on the Cosumnes River Task Force's website. Will this image, and the other image I uploaded Image:Cosumnes.png which I would like to use in an article I am writing about the Cosumnes_River be deleted? Any info on this will be appreciated. Thank you. --Scupper 13:22, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Image:Angola flag large.png

[edit]

FYI: ... has been deleted since it was redundant with Image:Angola flag 300.png -- Chris 73 14:17, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Image:World War I-TANK.jpg, Image:World War I-d.jpg

[edit]

Hi, could you have a look if there are any additional information on these images (i.e. image cedits)? That would be very helpful, thanks. --Mayhem 00:28, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

关于Image:Flower of Japanese pagoda tree.jpg

[edit]
File:Flower of Japanese pagoda tree.jpg

不是槐树，是刺槐（洋槐），英语叫 locust tree，（很奇怪，和蝗虫的名字一样），花是白色芳香，春季开花，叶子半透明，小枝上有刺。槐花是淡黄色，没有香味，叶子厚不透明，没有刺，现在还没有开花。我把图片挪到它正确的拉丁种名页，图片名称你只能自己改。--Fanghong 07:50, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

谢谢！--Shizhao 11:39, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Image:George-orwell.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:George-orwell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Thuresson 07:10, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

George Orwell

[edit]

You claim that this photo, Image:George-orwell.jpg, is more than 100 years old, although George Orwell was born in 1903. Please explain. Thuresson 3 July 2005 02:48 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi,

Thank you for helping to organize the Featured Pictures Candidates. I would ask if you could remember to move the old pictures to Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Log when you are finished counting the votes. Just place the picture under the right month. Thank you very much for your help,

Peregrine981 11:50, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Area San Francisco picture better

[edit]

You said:
Oppose to San Francisco Bay Area Shizhao 12:36, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
Can you, give me one Bay Area San Francisco picture better of this?
Well, here you can see the San Francisco airport, airterminal, airplain by airplain, you can see Berkeley University Campus building by buliding, you can see Alcatraz building, Golden Gate pilon, from 290 Kilometers altitude, I would like to see better, if you can.
You are wrong about cut south and north bay.
You can see the Sierra Nevada and its lake from here.
Give me another Bay Area photos from Ocean to Alta Sierra better of this.
Thank you.
--Roger (Messages) 19:43, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree! For the photograph Image:Nord_america.jpg, http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Featured_pictures_candidates&oldid=712196 

They is 6 and not 5 nominate

you forgets the vote Support - MPF 22:36, 22 http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Featured_pictures_candidates&oldid=712196 you corrects?

Template:Featured pictures candidates/Image:Nord america.jpg

[edit]

Hey there! Someone at Template talk:Featured pictures candidates had pointed out that on Template:Featured pictures candidates/Image:Nord america.jpg you miscounted because one of the votes wasn't aligned properly, I thought I better let you know why it's now been featured :) Regards, Joolz 21:30, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:China old map.jpg

[edit]

Please add some informations what is shown on the map (f.e. year). --Saperaud 11:53, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Merida Roman Theatre1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for doing all the work in Featured pictures, also for voting for my picture of the church. You did count all votes for and against this picture of the theatre, also those from the users who opposed only because of the noise. Since I removed the noise just yesterday I'd like to ask if they will change their oppinion. Do I get that time? Thanks --Ikiwaner 19:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So the users in question gave another statement on the picture. Maybe you recount again. Thanks --Ikiwaner 06:24, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

[edit]

A vandal named shizhao has deleted for the 2d time my pages. Are you the vandal? Oui 21:40, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

?--Shizhao 00:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
http://zh.wikibooks.org/wiki/C%C3%ADdi%C4%83n (6 deleted entries: if you would know what difficulty we have in west europe to prepare computer texts in chinese, you would understand my rage and be ashamed) Oui 20:53, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
hi Shizhao, if you not answer, I will begin to do the same as you: delete your different pages again and again and again... (::) Oui 20:08, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
hi Shizhao, thank you for your answer 是中文版的，因此应该使用中文书写 but I'm not experimented any more in reading chinese characters, I was never realy good in that but I didn't do that in the last 15 years! more I have vision's problems now and I cann't recognise the different strikes of the characters to search it in the dictionaries... can you explain me the same on englisch (or on pinyin if you have difficulties and better like to do so...). thank you very much Oui 22:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

[edit]

Image:Royal Standard.gif

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Royal Standard.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

For your information. --Voyager 17:17, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

re: Image:Hashish-shop-Kathmandu-1973.jpg

[edit]

Hi Shizhao. I'm at university at the moment and can't read some of the characters you wrote in your message to me. I'll respond properly later today when I am at home. pfctdayelise 03:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

你觉得“At least 5 supporting votes"的意思是，需要支持票比反支持票5多，是不是？ 我不同意。我觉得意思是支持票的最低限度是5。7比5多，就特色.

因为那个第二条件是：“Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority, that means at least 67% supporting)“ 这个意思是支持：反支持需要最低限度2：1。 7：3 = 2。33333333：1，就特色。

怎么样？

罗碧琴/pfctdayelise 10:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

我跟你同意--所有的条件需要满足就成为特色的。不好意思，我刚才说的话不太清楚。我以为这两个条件都满足。我们有共识吗？ ：）pfctdayelise 11:48, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
没关系！请你把你的新理解翻译成中文：Commons:特色图片候选. pfctdayelise 13:29, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

COM:FPC

[edit]

Could you add an English description for Image:Mjmhg009-renxiong.jpg? Many thanks LoopZilla 09:39, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shizhao/2005&oldid=7711748"