User talk:Sailko/Archive 5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[edit]

Sailko, do you know the copyright status of the works of Musei Capitolini? Thank you. Векочел (talk) 12:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Векочел they belong to the city administration of Rome. --Sailko (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They release it to the public domain? Векочел (talk) 03:54, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Like any museum in italy I don't think they made any special release. --Sailko (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Mentre puoi mettere questo
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.

This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.
The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain".
This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details.

quando è un lavoro artistico,ciao --Paris Orlando (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

QI

[edit]

Ciao,quando qualcuno in QI non fà quello che gli è stato richiesto puoi scrivere  Not done così non devi motivare troppo,grazie e buon lavoro --Paris Orlando (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charles VI of France

[edit]

Hi Sailko, this is a small question regarding your imports of the Dialogues de Pierre Salmon (it was in 2009). These files are of exceptional importance because they are the very rare representations of King Charles VI of France during his lifetime. In addition, your cropping is used later in a considerable number of books and documentaries dedicated to this sovereign. To be able to upload these drawings, you had probably had access to the works located in the Bibliothèque de Genève and the Bibliothèque nationale de France. Knowing that the cropped version has a dimension of 848 × 1048 pixels, is it possible that the day you go back to these establishments (if you have the possibility), you can download a more complete version (this for example) with a much better resolution? If this materializes, it would be a great advance on the iconography of one of our most controversial kings (because I'm myself French, and it shows on my mediocre level in English). In any case, good continuation and I really like your work here and on the Wikipedia in Italian. --Ellicrum {bablute [...]} 23:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi User:Ellicrum! Thanks for your nice words. I just uploaded the image scanning from my text book, and I have no better image to upload. Good continuation to you too!! --Sailko (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articolo

[edit]

L'articolo in inglese non si mette sui sostantivi che entrano da un'altra lingua, Sailko. Lo metti solo in inglese e solo dove l'istituzione ha nel suo nome ufficiale "The" oppure ha il sostantivo come qualificatore dell'istituzione e non è il suo nome proprio (per esempio, Alumni of Yale University, Yale è nome proprio; Alumni of the University of California, California è il qualificatore dell'università). -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pure qui, guarda: la categoria è Museo civico archeologico (Bologna), ma poi le sottocategorie sono Collections of the Archeological Museum of Bologna‎ (che per carità è giusto, in questo caso il the ci vuole, ma è incoerente con la categoria madre, o è tutto Museo civico archeologico o è tutto Archeological (a parte che è Archaeological :-) ) Museum of Bologna :-) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzo Piccolomini Bellanti in Pian e de' Mantellini, Siena

[edit]

Buona sera. Vengo a scusarmi con Lei, per quanto concerne il palazzo in oggetto, perché come si ricorderà se ne parlò a suo tempo. Le dissi che la famiglia Incontri non era una famiglia senese, e che tutti qui conoscono detto palazzo come Piccolomini Bellanti... La seconda parte è vera, la prima un po' meno. Ho scoperto che a Siena è esistita una famiglia nobile di nome Incontri, per cui ero, in buona fede in errore. Non so quali fossero le Sue fonti, ma potevano esser corrette. Le auguro una buona serata è scusi ancora. Guido Fineschi Sergardi (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caricamento foto

[edit]

Buona sera, ho caricato un file estratto da una Sua foto: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stemma_di_Domenico_Fineschi_da_Lamole.jpg. La userò per una pagina che creerò prossimamente. Grazie e buona serata. Guido Fineschi Sergardi (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Guido Fineschi Sergardi, va benissimo, licenza e citazione dell'autore sono a posto. Grazie --Sailko (talk) 14:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sailko: Buon mattino, Le riporto il link della pagina ove ho caricato l'immagine: https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fineschi_(famiglia) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guido Fineschi Sergardi (talk • contribs) 05:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clotilde, regina dei Franchi

[edit]

Ciao, Sailko. Ti disturbo per segnalarti che ho chiesto aiuto al Bar italiano come segue:

Salve. Ho notato che questo file è usato in molte pagine di wikipedia nella voce dedicata a Clotilde (regina dei Franchi). Leggendo però la descrizione, non pare proprio che si tratti dello stesso personaggio: «Statue de la reine de Saba (précédemment identifiée à sainte Clotilde, reine des Francs, épouse de Clovis Ier[1]). Notre-Dame de Corbeil. XIIème siècle». Si può verificare e eventualmente sistemare? La stessa immagine è nelle voci in molte altre lingue; peccato, se è sbagliata. Grazie dell'attenzione e un cordiale saluto. --Antonella (talk) 14:57, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Puoi darmi una mano, per favore? Grazie in ogni caso. --Antonella (talk) 22:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, non l'ho caricato io, non saprei. --Sailko (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry

[edit]

Hi, I saw one of your photos of a bust of Democritus File:Filosofo detto democrito, da villa dei papiri, peristilio quadrato.JPG. Because it was to dark, I made a new image changing the lighting on Photoshop. But when I was uploading it, I chose the original by mistake and now I can't change it. It was't my intention doing that, I'm really sorry. --Alvaro Marques Hijazo (talk) 00:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alvaro Marques Hijazo No problem, we can restore the original file, but I think you improved the image so I will not. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Medals and coins

[edit]

Hi ! Sorry for my mistake. The category tree of Commons is not good, with lot of categories with medals listed as subcategories from coins, such as Category:Medals by century or Category:Ancient Roman medals. I created the petscan request if you want to clean this up. Léna (talk) 17:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Léna, thank you for understanding and fixing! --Sailko (talk) 17:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Foto di Boboli

[edit]

Ciao, grazie per il riordino. Quelle sono foto che avevo scattato in una visita frettolosa in cui mi mettevano premura, quindi la qualità è persino inferiore al mio solito. Vedo che molte se non tutte servono veramente a poco a fianco alle tue, quindi se lo ritieni opportuno mettiamole pure in cancellazione. Mi rimetto a te. Nemo 16:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nemo ho soltanto sistemato un'attribuzione. Non preoccuparti, una statua, tanto più se esposta all'aperto, è bene documentarla anche in anni diversi. --Sailko (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Va bene! Se però trovi foto davvero troppo sfocate o sovraesposte che pensi non si possano vedere, mettile pure in immediata, non mi offendo. :) Nemo 20:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Non ne ho trovate, tranquillo ;) --Sailko (talk) 20:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - left nave - The Martyrdom of St Lawrence - Titian.jpg vs Tiziano, martirio di san lorenzo, 1588, 03.jpg

[edit]

Replacing a file labeled with a more unsafe file with false colors may be considered vandal. I hope we will not get angry for that. If you want you can come in VI to support your point of view. Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Archaeodontosaurus I love your files, but this one has really a bad coulour rendering, and it is burned in the lower part. Mine is less reatuched, and the colour more realistic. There is just too much blue in your file, and you can easily cheack that from the other professional images of the painting in the category (WGA and Yorck). Titian in that part of his life used warm colours, that doesn't match with your file. I do not understand when you say "unsafe file". I just thought my file was better, once in a while, I think you should not be so impulsive to immediately revert everything. This can also be considered vandalism. You should have discussed first and maybe ask for somebody else's neutral opinion before. --Sailko (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
About the Valued images: you uploaded about 7000 nice images, and you found the time to make galleries all around and request Quality status for each of them. I uploaded 230000, and I barely have the time to retouch and upload them, but this does not mean all my images are worse than yours, just because I decided to use my time to do something else than proposing each of them. If I propose 10 per day I would probably finish in more than 60 years. So please do not use your "VI status" like a licence to overcome any other new image. --Sailko (talk) 18:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, We have the same ideal with some differences on how to apprehend it, we are not enemies at all. You asked me one day how we could progress, I am convinced that we must do less, but better. If I propose to come in VI is because it is a discipline that imposes a control with a vote of the community. It's time that is not lost.

The only thing: avoid potential conflicts by talking. We know each other by our work and we have a common problem: time management. Let's avoid losing it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uso errato della cancellazione immediata

[edit]

‎Secondo la legge italiana, tutti i diritti di copyright appartenenti alla pubblica amministrazione italiana hanno una durata massima di solo venti anni. Questo è riportato proprio nel COM:FOP Italy che hai erroneamente utilizzato per giustificare la cancellazione immediata di diversi file. Io ho notato la cosa poiché avevo tra gli osservati i file nella Category:Fontana La Nave, alcuni dei quali sono già stati erroneamente cancellati. In passato, il tuo stesso dubbio ha portato altri utenti a proporre la cancellazione di file rappresentati l'opera; sottolineo, hanno proposto la cancellazione tramite discussione (non in immediata) la quale ha poi chiarito i dubbi (vedi Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Nave di Cascella, Pescara (2).jpg). Ti invito, pertanto, a rimuovere i tag per la cancellazione immediata laddove inseriti erroneamente. Saluti, --Earthh (talk) 21:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Specifico, la nave di Cascella fu commissionata dal Comune di Pescara e costruita nel 1987. Essendo di proprietà della pubblica amministrazione, i diritti di copyright hanno una durata di venti anni. Questo ci permette di caricare immagini rappresentati suddetta opera qui su commons, in regola con quanto dice COM:FOP Italy.--Earthh (talk) 22:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In più, quando si candidano file per la cancellazione immediata, i loro autori dovrebbero essere notificati. Io, personalmente, non sono stato notificato e se non avessi controllato gli osservati molti file sarebbero stati erroneamente cancellati.--Earthh (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Avvisare gli utenti

[edit]

Ti ricordo che se segnali una pagina per la cancellazione, devi avvisare l'utente. Nel caso di File:Teatro della Germinazione ad Avezzano.jpg e degli altri, meglio aprire una DR regolare, così poi si recuperano. Ti lascio avviare, mentre faccio il resto. --Ruthven (msg) 13:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS: alla fine ho fatto io. Ricordati che per il FoP non si segnala la cancellazione immediata, ma va aperta una regolare procedura. --Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Santo spirito, cappella petrini arrighi, il passignano, martirio di san lorenzo (1602).JPG

[edit]

è il martirio di Stefano protomartire; errore di etichettatura probabilmente. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Archaeodontosaurus, giusta osservazione, ho corretto :) --Sailko (talk) 15:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caricamento foto in Commons

[edit]

Ciao, ti chiedo se puoi risolvermi questo quesito, proposto al Bar ma senza risposta: il Decreto Legge 31 maggio 2014 n. 83 ("decreto cultura") consente liberamente, se non erro, "la riproduzione di beni culturali" nei musei pubblici e privati italiani e "la divulgazione delle immagini legittimamente acquisite con qualsiasi mezzo". Chiedo cortesemente se le immagini da me acquisite direttamente nei musei possono essere pubblicate in Wikimedia Commons e con quale licenza. Grazie. --Teseo (✉) 07:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Utente:Teseo se si tratta di un museo statale puoi caricarle aggiungendo in ciascuna immagine questo template: {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}}. Per gli altri musei puoi chiedere un'autorizzazione, oppure caricarli a tuo rischio. Ciao --Sailko (talk) 18:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Augustinus (painter)

[edit]

Hello.The name is not clear so please write the full name or create the category yourself.Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan hendrick weissembruch, bassa marea a zeeland, scheveningen, 1900 ca.jpg and recent photos

[edit]

Dear Sailko,

Thank you for your photographs! I notice that you put only your own name in the Author field, not the artist (which you put in the file name, without capitals I think). * Could you please for the sake of the database and lookup ease mention the artist in the author field? (For instance using the {{Creator:..}} template? A photographer of an existing work of art is not a creator, if the representation has no original properties.) Thank you, greetings from the Netherlands, Hansmuller (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hansmuller hello. I am sorry, I upload thousands of images and if the upload wizards deosn't allow me to do that directly, I cannot make it manual for each image. This is a problem I already know, that many users noticed, and that nobody seems able to fix. It would be enough if the Wizard would fill the field "Photographer" instead of "Author" for self-published works. I tried to request some modifcation in phabricator, but it was just a frustrating experience, so I am not going to make any other request there, sorry. If you want to try you have all my support. I neverthless think that it's quite obvious from the category and the filename that I'm not a painter or a sculptor, I am just the photographer. Cheers. --Sailko (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Sailko, thanks for your answer. I use the elegant Pattypan (or formerly GlamWikiToolset) and uploaded some 280.000 images where i could differentiate between for example artist and photographer (as in the fields in Template Artwork that you used for Jan Hendrik Weissenbruch, for instance) and more. (When we nevertheless use UploadWizard, we can still easily indicate explicitly description, artist (in Author) and photographer (in Source, say {{own}}).) By the way, titles in Italian will not be understood by many readers. Please give it a try as you are a prolific user, thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 11:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:Hansmuller, I already tried Pattypan and it is not good for me. It is a lot of extra copy and paste, and it is not versatile enough when I upload at the same time cityscapes, architecture or artworks. But most important I mostly upload from my job, and here I cannot download, I can only use online resources. Writing filenames already takes me hours and hours (plus many hours to shot, many many many many hours to manually retouch each image and finally upload), I think I do enough. Maybe one day upload wizard will be smart enought to understand automatically all the infos I already provide. I see there are many users who improve my files with templates and extra categories, I appreciate but it's not the job I like to do. About the Italian language, as I arrived to Commons the only available art photos were from the Yorck Project, with captation in German only. So If Commons accepted that, I thought they should also accept my Italian filenames, and that's it. As I can see from the stats there is no other people in the world, besides me, who uploaded more that 200k self-made and self-retouched images here, and whenever I asked for some help, making the Wizard more efficient and useful for what I do, nobody ever cared, and it was very frustrating as I had to discuss with people who maybe uploaded 200 files in their life. So I'm sorry but I am not going to do more because of faults in the uploading system. I just had some extra time I'd rather make better use of the images into the Wikimedia projects, and possibly get more valued/quality image status. --Sailko (talk) 11:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Giovan Battista Paggi

[edit]

Hello Sailko, are you sure that "your" paintings are from Giovan? - They are "2 Giovan(ni) Battista Paggi": 1. un pittore manierista italiano: Category:Giovanni Battista Paggi - e un architetto barocco italiano: [Category:Giovan Battista Paggi]. - I think the paintings are from Giovanni, not Giovan. - P.S. Can you begin in your private files with your private category:Photographs by User:Sailko ??? [I know you love it, but I hate it to find category:Photographs by User:Sailko between the others]. I think worldwide we write (and add categories) from top to bottom. Adelfrank (talk) 14:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adelfrank! Thanks for all the fixes you are doing on files! Please remeber that before 1800s there was no registry office for names, so a LOT of graphic variation were possible and very common. The name Giovanni Battista (from John the Baptist) could be written "Giovan Battista", "Giambattista", "Gianbattista", "Gian Battista", "Battista", "Gio Batta" and many many more, but it is always the same name. In books and captations I can show you many examples of graphic variation on the same person's name. As regards Commons I think we have a standard to mostly use the fully extended names, like "Giovanni Battista", in categories, but we have to be a little flexible, as files can use one of the possible variants. By the way, about "Paggi" I have to be mnore careful in which category it ends. Maybe those categories need a further check, we may decide to divinde into "Giovanni Battista Paggi (architect)" and "Giovanni Battista Paggi (painter)". Thank you 👍 --Sailko (talk) 14:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As regards the cats position it does not depend on me, but from Upload Wizard and HotCat. It is not my fault sorry! You can see if a bot can help you to move it to the end. I think you shopuld try to use HotCat too, it makes averything simple when you work with categories! --Sailko (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Giovan Battista Paggi (time: 1659-1684) and Category:Giovanni Battista Paggi (1554-1627) are one man??? And this is only a joke?: Giovan Battista Paggi (Roma, notizie fra il 1659 e il 1684) è stato un architetto barocco italiano. Non va confuso con il pittore manierista Giovanni Battista Paggi (Genova, 1554-1627). - And here is this triptychon not a painting, only a fresco? [[1]] - I have no other questions, thanks a lot. Adelfrank (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed both, thank you --Sailko (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, you have the time to delete all my works, it's o.k. - But what do you think about your own works? - In Category:Madonna dell'Umiltà (Pistoia) - Interior are some old pics, what do you think if you see this e.g.: File:Pistoia, madonna dell'umiltà, cupola 03.JPG or File:Pistoia, madonna dell'umiltà, cappella 02.JPG? Do you do'nt like to delete they too? Adelfrank (talk) 16:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adelfrank I didn't delete any image of yours, I just replaced the Frescos category inside the paintings, because this is where they are normally in any commons category tree. I made a new set of images about Basilica dell'Umiltà (Pistoia), so if you want to delete old blurry pictures you have my total support. --Sailko (talk) 17:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to speedy delete both.. hope they will accept ;) --Sailko (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Birth house of Lorenzo Viani

[edit]

Good morning Sailko. Is this right that Lorenzo Viani was burn in Viareggio? So I think that cannot be the birth house, only the House of Lorenzo Viani. (?) - Best regards Adelfrank (talk) 06:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Adelfrank. You could be right, I cannot remeber now. I think I based myself on the plate, but I could be wrong. --Sailko (talk) 06:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chiusure a richiesta

[edit]

Ciao, non che ci sia un regolamento qui come CAMPAGNA su it.wiki, però evitiamo di chiamare admin "compiacenti" per chiedere la DR. È più corretto scrivere che: "Il caso è simile ad un altro e che per coerenza va chiuso in modo simile". Ovviamente non interverrò in quella DR... --Ruthven (msg) 06:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Ruthven, non mi fraintendere, sono solo due casi simili che sono aperti da mesi e di cui tenevo il link a portata di mano in talk, io non ti conosco e non ti ritengo "compiacente", ho solo visto che ti sei occupato di un argomento e che potresti chiudere anche l'altro caso simile. Mi è già capitato di sollecitare una chiusura, ma io faccio tutto alla luce del sole, non prendo accordi sottobanco. Non so come mai su Commons alcune procedure semplici richiedano mesi e anni per la chiusura, mentre altre si risolvono nel giro di una, due settimane. Ad esempio con Adelfrank abbiamo chiesto di cancellare alcune immagini blurry dopo che ho rifatto il set di una chiesa. Metà sono state cancellate in "speedy delete", una dopo un mese, un'altra è ancora aperta. Mi sono sempre chiesto se a voi admin le procedure appaiono random, tipo il feed di Facebook, o c'è qualche criterio se a volte andate a spulciare le cose vecchie. Lo dico solo per curiosità senza alcuna vena polemica. Ciao --Sailko (talk) 06:58, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Il fatto è che c'è tanto lavoro arretrato da impazzire. Pensa che sto chiudendo in questi giorni della DR di febbraio-marzo. Sono i casi controversi ad essere lunghi da chiudere, perché non si vuole essere immischiati in lamentele infinite o dover giustificare le proprie azioni come in un tribunale. Uno chiude le DR con le quali si sente comodi, insomma. Per esempio, io non tocco loghi, ma volentieri vado a cercare se un file è effettivamente PD old.
Se ti accorgi che delle foto tue vanno cancellate, e te ne accorgi a pochi giorni dall'upload, inserisci nelle pagine {{SD|G7}} e vedrai che saranno cancellate al volo! --Ruthven (msg) 07:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category Name

[edit]

Hello.This category needs to be created but I found that the Wikipedia article is called "Domenico Tojetti"؟Is the name wrong or is it the name of another artist? ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It should be the same person. I/J is just a variant. I created the category, thank you --Sailko (talk) 12:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Duomo di Castelnuovo di Garfagnana - Paintings

[edit]

Hello Sailko, me again. Do you know more to/about the painting madonna col bambino e santi & madonna in trono tra i ss. andrea e jacopo in this category? 1. creator: Giuseppe Porta and 2. creator: Giovanni Antonio Sogliani, both pics from you? Two creators for one painting, I think it's one too much. Adelfrank (talk) 19:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Adelfrank It's 2 attributions, one was the main thing in 2008 the other arouse after 2014. You can read something about it here: [2] --Sailko (talk) 19:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, very interesting! - I think Giovanni Antonio Sogliani is the right creator (You can see the paintings in his category with sildeshow and you see one painting before your pic the sister-project of this painting) but it's not my profession. Good night. Adelfrank (talk) 19:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Federica Moro

[edit]

Hi Sailko,
Are you positive these photos are of Federica Moro: 1, 2, 3? The person depicted is highly unlikely the same one as on File:Quintana di foligno, giostra, vittoria croce bianca 07 federica moro.JPG (neither dress nor face match). Sealle (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sealle, 1 and 2 is Federica Moro, yes, n.3 is somebody else. I cant' remeber who exactly after so many years... --Sailko (talk) 11:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wounded Cuirassier Leaving the Field of Battle (Géricault)

[edit]

@Sailko: please take a look at this and this painting, obviously not the same. That is why I removed some of the files from that category. Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 12:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lotje Yeah that wasn't me adding those cats. --Sailko (talk) 13:06, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, Sailko sorry for the confusion, it was Shakko as a result of moving the category. Never mind, all clear now. Lotje (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Correzioni codice WLM

[edit]

Scusami per il flood di notifiche negli OS, ma sto correggendo i codici di Ravenna per WLM (alcuni monumenti hanno un doppio codice, quindi li sto normalizzando). Ciao. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 13:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana - nuovi beni aderenti

[edit]

Gentili fotografi, un ultimo aggiornamento in vista dei prossimi week end. Segnaliamo che dal primo settembre si sono aggiunti per WLM2019 nuovi beni a Pescia, Cascina, Careggine, Pomarance, Vinci e Castelfiorentino. Sono inoltre state trascritte delibere provenienti per la prima volta anche dai comuni di Massa, Carrara, Rufina, Follonica e San Vincenzo. Date un'occhiata perché non è escluso che arrivino ancora altre adesioni integrative all'ultimo minuto.
Messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--12:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vecchietta

[edit]

Ciao, ho visto che hai aggiunto la categoria Vecchietta ad alcune foto che ho caricato, ma visto che hai anche inserito nella cat sul Vecchietta direttamente la categoria Palazzo Branda - Loggia rinascimentale, di cui quelle foto fanno parte, adesso non è ridondante? Se sono già nella categoria della loggia che senso ha metterle in quella generale dell'artista? Affolliamo solo la categoria principale rimettendoci in navigabilità. :-) --Phyrexian ɸ 02:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phyrexian Ho tolto la sottocategoria perché non tutto nella loggia è attribuito al Vecchietta, mi ero un po' confuso. Ciao! --Sailko (talk) 07:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, grazie. :-) --Phyrexian ɸ 10:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ostensorio di Pietro Vannini

[edit]

Ciao, avrei bisogno di un chiarimento. Nella Category:Museo Diocesano (Ariano Irpino) da te creata hai inserito alcune immagini relative a un ostensorio del Vannini che effettivamente risulta essere custodito nel museo diocesano di Ariano Irpino, tuttavia le foto risultano essere state scattate nel palazzo Lanfranchi di Matera. Mi sembra di intuire che l'ostensorio si trovasse a Matera in esposizione temporanea; è così, puoi confermare? -- 3knolls (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

3knolls esattamente così ;) --Sailko (talk) 16:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

file Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld

[edit]

Hi, there is a typo in the name of your file: You wrote "Caroesfeld" (stanza dell'ariosto (orlando furioso), 1822-27, angelica, ferraù e rinaldo 01.jpg) instead of "Carolsfeld". Could you possibly rename it? Best regards, --Hodsha (talk) 16:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Hodsha --Sailko (talk) 18:13, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dipinti nella chiesa di San Martino

[edit]

Ciao Sailko. Vedo che i titoli che hai dato ai due dipinti relativi a San Martino nella cappella di San Martino (Certosa di San Martino, Napoli) sono invertiti rispetto al soggetto rappresentato.

Puoi sanare questa cosa? Grazie mille. Un caro abbraccio. --DenghiùComm (talk) 17:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DenghiùComm Grazie della segnalazione, ho sistemato ;) --Sailko (talk) 17:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Grazie mille ! Sei stato velocissimo ! --DenghiùComm (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

[edit]

English ∙ español ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ∙ Türkçe  ∙ +/−

Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Sailko,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

-- ~riley (talk) 16:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alexiad

[edit]

Hi, if this is a photo of an Alexiad manuscript I’d like to use it in the English Wikipedia Alexiad article. However, the description parameter only gives the name of the museum. Would you mind updating it to make it clear what it is. Many thanks. DeCausa (talk) 11:06, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeCausa I descript the images in the filename :) --Sailko (talk) 11:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I’ve added in a link to the Biblioteca Laurenzia online catalogue entry for the item just to make it clear on the source for en.wp users. Hope you don’t mind. DeCausa (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strameritatissimo

[edit]
Wikilovers Puglia - Premio fotografo più prolifico

link a sorpresa :) Per aver caricato una tonnellata di foto--Pierpao.lo (listening) 19:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie, bellissimo!! :D Pierpao --Sailko (talk) 21:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ringraziamo user:Luigib25 per questo. --Pierpao.lo (listening) 22:18, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Premiazione ed inaugurazione mostra di Wiki Loves Puglia 2019

[edit]

Caro partecipante a Wiki Loves Puglia 2019,
ti ricordo che oggi alle 17 presso la Sala del Colonnato del Palazzo della Città Metropolitana di Bari si terrà la premiazione di Wiki Loves Puglia 2019 e l'inaugurazione della relativa mostra (che includerà le foto premiate di Wiki Loves Puglia 2019 e quelle di Wiki Loves Monuments 2018). Ti aspetto! Troverai poi la lista dei premiati su questa pagina.
Grazie per aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Puglia 2019, se vuoi continuare a seguire le attività qui in Puglia aggiungi il tuo nome qui.
Un caro saluto, --Ferdi2005[Posta] 12:46, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sailko/Archive_5&oldid=387182432"