User talk:Ricce
Image Tagging Image:Copia_colt.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Copia_colt.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. __ ABF __ ϑ 15:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
THE OBJECT IS MY PROPERTY AND THE PHOTO ARE MADE BY MYSELF. I DONT KNOW EXACTLY WHAT TO DO NOW--Ricce 17:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
categorie
[edit]Ciao Ricce, ma che belle foto hai caricato! Solo un suggerimento: su commons le categorie vanno scritte in inglese, per cui le forbici vanno sotto "scissors", ecc. Se nonm sai come categorizzare una foto scrivimi pure o chiedi al Bar italiano. Ciao! --Sailko (talk) 14:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- Prova a chiedere a un amministratore: Trixt parla italiano. --Sailko (talk) 06:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
English tranlsation for TEM image
[edit]I have used your TEM image [1] on the english wikipedia, but I was wondering if you can translate the annotations into english? Hat'nCoat (talk) 04:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Ciao, non ho capito una cosa: come fai a sapere che l'autore della copertina è morto da 70 anni? In ogni caso perché anche gli altri possano verificare è bene indicare l'edizione da cui è tratta. --Nemo 23:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ottimo. :-) --Nemo 00:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Mafalda 2.jpg is uncategorized since 8 May 2009.
- Image:450px-Colonne de Vendôme.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
File:Defense arco sotto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Yaroslav Blanter (talk) 09:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
FORBICI
[edit]Ciao Ricce, sono anch'io un'appassionata di arte e storia e sto facendo una ricerca sulle forbici. Ho trovato una stretta somiglianza tra queste che compaiono in un trattato scientifico del XVI secolo
http://pieroland.net/temp/forbici.html
e le forbici del '500 strepitose che hai messo on line. Mi chiedevo se le forbici della tua foto sono in un museo o in qualche collezione italiana. Che tu sappia sono destinate a qualche uso in particolare? tipo da carta, sartoria o altro?
saluti, Elicriso
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
File:Uovo dino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
乌拉跨氪 (talk) 11:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected File:Ponte d'jena a parigi1.jpg
Yours sincerely, Myrabella (talk) 10:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Abbaino
[edit]Salve, avrei da fare una domanda. Questa foto è stata scattata in Italia? Saluti.--Carnby (talk) 13:35, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Come ho scritto anche nella tua PU: si. è stata scattata a Firenze, da me. Ciao --150.217.45.98 09:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC) (Scusa sono Ricce sloggato!)
File:Mafalda 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 01:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Statue del trocadero.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 13:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Ricce,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Ciao
[edit]Sto facendo un censimento di alcun utenze toscane per organizzare qualche attività. Tu sei inattivo da un po' ma vivi ancora in zona? Mi par di ricordare che fossi legato a Firenze? Per "attività" si intendo incontri, iniziative o gite. Insomma non è importante tornare a essere attivi sulle piattaforme wiki, solo condividere qualche esperienza assieme.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected File:Defense5.JPG
Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Dessì.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Túrelio (talk) 13:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Floriano Papi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Alberto Monroy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Angelo senna.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Angelo senna.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 14:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
This is hardly your own work. Reproducing an existing 2-dimensional work does not create a new copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 14:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Chiarugi.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Chiarugi.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 14:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
This is hardly your own work. Reproducing an existing 2-dimensional work does not create a new copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 14:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Colosi.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Colosi.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Pardi.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pardi.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
date of photography
[edit]Hi Ricce, for most of your recent uploads you have not provided any information about when these photos have been shot. This is information is rather critical with portrait shots. Teh erelavnt date is NOT the date of the reproduction, but of the original photography.
- File:Alberto Ugolini.jpg
- File:Ercolini.jpg
- File:Baccetti.jpg
- File:Valdo Mazzi.jpg
- File:Floriano Papi.jpg
- File:Alberto Monroy.jpg
- File:Pardi.jpg
- File:Chiarugi.jpg
--Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Colosi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Randykitty (talk) 11:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Valdo Mazzi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Randykitty (talk) 11:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Ercolini.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Randykitty (talk) 11:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Baccetti.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Randykitty (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Angelo senna.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Randykitty (talk) 11:57, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Pardi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Randykitty (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Alberto Monroy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Randykitty (talk) 12:12, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
- File:Pardi.jpg
- File:Colosi.jpg
- File:Alberto Ugolini.jpg
- File:Ercolini.jpg
- File:Baccetti.jpg
- File:Valdo Mazzi.jpg
Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 06:50, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Triceratops ricce 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Caricare su commons
[edit]Devi inserire dei template specifici quando carichi foto scansionate da vecchi libri. Per esempio quelle riportate in Category:PD-old license tags. Solo che ognuna dipende da molti dettagli (tipo di pubblicazione, paese, originalità). poi che ci sia gente che a parità di tempo invece di stare a cancellare robaccia recente si incaponisce con file dubbiosi che magari vanno sicuramente in pubblico dominio entro pochi anni, concordo che soprattutto con centinaia di migliaia file in violazione di copyright palese più inutili o duplicati da cancellare non abbia un grosso senso pratico, ma amen.
Al massimo se mi dai un dettaglio chiaro un caso alla volta posso aiutarti (ma non sono espertissimo). In generale comunque se hai dubbi chiedi direttamente a commons:bar italiano.
Prima esempio: immagine da chi e cosa?--Alexmar983 (talk) 15:58, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana - preparazione
[edit]Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana
Stiamo organizzando Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2019. Il concorso si tiene a settembre ma ci muoviamo con largo anticipo. Puoi consultare in questa pagina il lavoro in corso. Ci sono monumenti (o intere amministrazioni) che mancano vicino alla tua zona di interesse? Fallo presente e vedremo di fare il possibile! per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista |
Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana sta per iniziare
[edit]Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana
L'organizzazione di Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2019 ha proseguito e qua potete consultare il lavoro dei volontari. Qui potete valutare quanto è stato liberato finora. Nuove liberatorie arriveranno nei prossimi giorni. Il primo settembre inizia il concorso, ti preghiamo di informare le persone interessate vicino a te e, se puoi, anche di condividere i post sui vari canali sociali. Qui e qui e qui è possibile scaricare il volantino di promozione regionale in alcune delle lingue più comuni per i turisti. messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista |
Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--23:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Toscana sta per finire
[edit]Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana
Fra poco si chiuderà l'edizione 2021 di Wiki Loves Monuments. Ci teniamo a segnalare a chi avesse scorso le liste in precedenza, che negli ultimi giorni sono stati concessi a tempo indefinito nuovi beni da fotografare a Pontremoli, Volterra e San Giovanni Valdarno. Se hai delle foto di archivio da condividere, il bottone blu di caricamento su ogni riga in tabella sarà attivo fino alla mezzanotte di oggi. per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista Per informazioni: Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2021 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2021 #WLM2021 |
Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)