User talk:Ralf Roletschek/Archive/2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Sciurus aestuans by Dario Sanches.jpg

File:Sciurus aestuans by Dario Sanches.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JuTa 03:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

File:16-12-22-Bundeskriminalamt-Anis-Amri-4.jpg

File:16-12-22-Bundeskriminalamt-Anis-Amri-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2001:A61:3287:E801:21D:60FF:FE54:B8ED 19:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Spocht

Hi, gleichzeitig mit deinem Schwimm-Meeting ist in Graz auch Dameineishockey, willst Du Dir beides antun (alle Mannschaften spielen täglich) oder sollen wir uns treffen? LG --Ailura (talk) 07:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Eishockey ist dein Metier, du bist besser als ich. Aber treffen können wir uns gerne. Und ich muß ja auch mal arbeiten , das Schwimmen ist am WE. ;) --Ralf Roleček 07:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Aeh, ja, Urlaubstage, da war noch was.. ich muss noch sehen ob ich es am Wochenende davor machen muss. --Ailura (talk) 08:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-16-Glasgow International Airport-Flugzeugaufnahme-RR2 7348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-16-Glasgow Airport-RR2 7321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 09:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-15-Glasgow Airport-RR2 6993.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 09:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-16-Glasgow Airport-RR2 7305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image is OK for me but I think it would be better to add some category related with "signs". --Basotxerri 09:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 15:20, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! --Basotxerri 19:33, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tmp.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 20:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-16-Glasgow International Airport-Flugzeugaufnahme-RR2 7327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-15-Straßenszene Glasgow-RR2 7146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus rto main part of the photo, sharp enough for Q1 under this light-conditions (early evening) --Michielverbeek 22:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-15-Glasgow Airport-RR2 6995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-15-Alexander Thomson Hotel Glasgow-RR2 7108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I like the backseides of things. --Kritzolina 16:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-15-Alexander Thomson Hotel Glasgow-RR2 7121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-15-Bahnhof Glasgow Central-RR2 7029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-16-Glasgow Airport-RR2 7320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7518-7522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 01:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 01:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7575-7583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7524-7530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentVery good photo but some gren CA, also slightly dark imo and small ccw tilt.--ArildV 08:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done you're right. --Ralf Roletschek 18:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Support --ArildV 18:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-07-22-Flughafen-Paris-CDG-RalfR-N3S 9886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Two hot pixel to be removed and needs denoising. --C messier 11:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 17:50, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
The two hot pixels are still there (see notes). --C messier 14:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC) no, there are correctet! Is the picture in your Cache? --Ralf Roletschek 21:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 Support It is OK now. --C messier 18:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-04-04-Altstadt Jerusalem-WAT 6596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please remember to properly categorize your images. --MB-one 13:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-09-25-Graz-Ostbahnhof-RR2 6385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like the composition although the colors look a bit strange --Moroder 20:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

File:2011-07-17-hechingen-by-RalfR-101.jpg

File:2011-07-17-hechingen-by-RalfR-101.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Volksgarten

Hallo Ralf Roletschek, deine jüngst hochgeladenen Fotos zum Category:Volksgarten, Vienna zeigen nicht alle den Volksgarten und manche davon zeigen Details des Volksgartens (z.B. Theseustempel). Oft ist im Hintergrund noch was anderes zu sehen (Rathaus). Commons-Kategorien sind keine Tags, die deine Foto-Touren beschreiben, sondern fassen Bilder zusammen, die z.B. den Volksgarten zeigen (hier also so etwas wie eine Objektkategorie). Dies umso mehr, als der Volksgarten als denkmalgeschütztes Objekt Bilder zu eben diesem sammelt, und von der WP:de auch in diesem Sinne verlinkt wird. Für Fototouren kannst du alternativ user-Kategorien verwenden, etwa Category:Ralf Roletschek goes Volksgarten, 2017-02-15, die können dann aber ob des heterogenene Inhalts nicht unter Category:Volksgarten, Vienna einsortiert werden. Bitte kümmere dich um eine passende Beschreibung, Kategorisierung und Umbenennung der für den Volksgarten unpassenden Bilder. Dies ist auch eine Vorraussetzung für QI und eine Empfehlung der Förderrichtlinien vom WMAT. Für die optimierte Auffindbarkeit durch ev. Nachnutzer sind diese Angaben und ihre Korrektheit natürlich auch wichtig. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Dann lasse ich die Kategorien ganz weg. Um in dem Chaos was zu finden, muß man Englisch können. Und Dateinamen sind nur ein technisches Hilfsmittel, die sind kein Ersatz für die Beschreibung. Zum Auffinden und Nachnutzen wird Google benutzt, nicht unauffindbare englische Kategorien. --Ralf Roleček 09:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Wenn im Dateinamen, in der Beschreibung und in der Kategorie Volksgarten steht, wie soll google dann die Bilder zum Parlament finden? Mit @Darkweasel94: hat sich ja wieder jemand gefunden, der hinter dir nachräumt. Alles im grünen Bereich. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Wenn du nicht alles vollständig kategorisieren magst (hab ich Verständnis dafür, wenn du dich in Wien und seinem Kategoriensystem nicht so gut auskennst), ist es am besten, du kategorisierst in irgendwas allgemeines wie Category:Vienna oder in diesem Falle eventuell Category:Innere Stadt, Vienna (falls du dich zumindest mit den Bezirken zurechtfindest). Dann finden es Leute, die in allgemeinen Kategorien aufräumen. In Category:Volksgarten, Vienna sucht aber normalerweise niemand Fotos von den Flaggen auf dem Leopoldinischen Trakt. Aber selbst das ist noch besser als gar keine Kategorien, immerhin habe ich es wegen der vorhandenen Kategorisierung bemerkt. darkweasel94 21:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Ok, das kann ich machen. Ich bekomme über die Beobachtungsliste mit, was so an meinen Fotos ständig umkategorisiert wird. Da bleibt fast nie was dort, wo ich es hingelegt habe. Ich mache das doch nicht, um jemanden zu ärgern. Mit Volksgarten dachte ich, es zumindest nahe genug dort zu kategorisieren, um ein Auffinden zu gewährleisten. Den Namen "Theseustempel" kannte ich bislang nicht, ich hätte ein Foto dieses Bauwerks in der Cat. Volksgarten gesucht. So meine Denke. --Ralf Roleček 21:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Und jetzt wollte ich was nachbessern, ihr seit schneller. Danke! --Ralf Roleček 21:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Die Beschreibungen (etwa File:17-02-15-Wien-Volksgarten-RalfR-RR2 7820.jpg, alle) sind btw. noch immer stereotyp einheitlich "Volksgarten Wien". Da bestünde noch Handlungsbedarf, die jetzt richtigen Kategorien würden helfen. Und die Beschreibungen sind Deutsch. Passende Beschreibungen in Spanisch oder Tschechisch wären echter Mehrwert. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:23, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-02-15-Wien-Volksgarten-RalfR-RR2 7858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-02-15-Wien-Volksgarten-RalfR-RR2 7835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

File:WikiPress 8 Fahrräder-1.jpg

Hallo Ralf, bin beim Nach-Kategorisieren auf File:WikiPress 8 Fahrräder-1.jpg gestoßen. Das Umschlagbild ist lt. File:WikiPress_8_Fahrräder.pdf aus mehreren Bildern zusammengesetzt, darunter File:MountainBikegrouse mtn downhill race.jpg (Cc-by-sa-2.0) von Andrew Raun, das gelöscht wurde ([1]) und auch auf Flickr nicht mehr zu finden ist ([2]). Die Umschlaggestaltung stammt von Ute Scharrer. Meiner Ansicht ist das ein abgeleitetes Werk, der Credit geht auch an Andrew Raun und Ute Scharrer. Wie die fehlerhafte Lizenz von File:MountainBikegrouse mtn downhill race.jpg hier geheilt werden kann, weiß ich nicht. Außerdem kann man CC-by-sa und GFDL mE nicht so einfach zu GFDL-only kombinieren:

  • ([3]: Unfortunately, works under CC-BY-SA and GFDL cannot directly be combined : Unglücklicherweise können Werke unter CC-BY-SA und GFDL nicht direkt miteinander kombiniert werden.) und
  • ([4],[5]): For BY-SA 2.0, all future versions of BY-SA and all ports of BY-SA 2.0 or later are automatically compatible / Für BY-SA 2.0, alle zukünftigen Versionen von BY-SA und alle Portierungen von BY-SA 2.0 oder höher sind automatisch kompatibel.
    Da steht explizit nix von GFDL.

lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Ja, das ist korrekt, wohl eine aus heutiger Sicht nicht mehr korrekte Gestaltung. Ich habe das fragliche Bild auch kürzlich gesucht und nicht gefunden. Ist wohl ein LA das Beste. Hier kommt erschwerend hinzu, daß das gedruckt erschienen ist. Allerdings wurden im gedruckten Buch die Bilder einzeln beschrieben und lizenziert. Das Cover jedoch als Gesamtwerk ist nicht sauber. --Ralf Roleček 22:48, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
machst du LA oder soll ich? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Ich habe SLA gestellt. --Ralf Roleček 10:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hallo zusammen, da ich zufällig diese Diskussion mitbekam, habe ich die Löschung mit Verweis auf diese Diskussion übernommen. Grüße in die Runde, AFBorchert (talk) 11:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Danke. --Ralf Roleček 11:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

FPC

Thanks for your adivise and your vote and thanks for File:HotelSasso-MardelPlata-1.jpg, I want to upload the sources of this photo, but the files size is more than 800Mb!!!. Regards!!!

Tu puedes subir los photos uno por uno a migo? ralf@roletsche.de --Ralf Roleček 22:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
OK Ezarateesteban 22:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
I just uplodes the RAWs in couples of two, see the links in the photo. Best Regards!! --Ezarateesteban 23:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Es mejor si tu hace las imagenes individualmente en orientación vertical. Ver a este photo. De otro manera es como una manguera ;) Antes de montaje eliminar los machas de polvo. --Ralf Roleček 08:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

File:15-01-17-erklaervideo-simpleshow-RalfR-DSCF1071-13.jpg

File:15-01-17-erklaervideo-simpleshow-RalfR-DSCF1071-13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bigbossfarin (talk) 15:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Manchmal fragt man sich wirklich... --Smial (talk) 22:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Wir haben ja sonst nix zu tun hier... oder zu löschen. --Ralf Roleček 23:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Falsche Bild-Beschriftung

Hallo Ralf! Soweit ich sehe, ist bei diesem von dir erstellten Bild eine Beschriftung falsch: bei ISO (ETRTO) sollte die Beschriftung am unteren Bildrand wohl

Breite - InnenØ

lauten anstelle von

InnenØ - Breite

oder? --91.130.39.117 17:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Verdammt, du hast Recht! Das werde ich korrigieren. Danke fürs Aufpassen! --Ralf Roleček 22:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-07-20-Plaza-de-las-tres-Culturas-RalfR-N3S 9335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-09-23-Festung Küstrin Ruinen-RalfR-N3S 1840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 13:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-09-17-WikiLovesCocktails-Diverses-Img0180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-16-Glasgow International Airport-Flugzeugaufnahme-RR2 7343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-03-09-Anke-Schwarzenberg RR26714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The reflection in the glasses could have been avoided, perhaps, but otherwise good quality. --Peulle 07:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-03-09-Diana-Bader RR26745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-03-09-Jutta-Lieske RR26622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 07:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-03-09-Raik-Nowka RR26468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-03-17-Wien-DSC 0030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-03-16-Ewa Dziedzic-RR7 8316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-03-16-marianne-hackl-RR7 8242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good sharp quality. --Peulle 14:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-02-15-Lietadlá Ministerstva vnútra slovenské republiky-RR2 7931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Needs more categories of course --A.Savin 16:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC) Schwierig. OM-BTA hat hier scheinbar keine Kat. und die anderen kann ich nicht identifizieren. Deshalb die Oberkat. --Ralf Roletschek 22:55, 15 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment What about location, airplane type. --A.Savin 02:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC) so ok? --Ralf Roletschek 21:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --A.Savin 00:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-03-17-Wien-DSC 0027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-03-09-Ralf-Holzschuher RR26790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Several dustspots, specially one even visible at low resolution (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 17:57, 16 March 2017 (UTC) right, correctet. --Ralf Roletschek 19:25, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:42, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Weister oder Meister

Hi Ralf, sollte man die File:17-03-16-Jägerweister-Miniaturen-RR7 8310.jpg nihct besser auf File:17-03-16-Jägermeister-Miniaturen-RR7 8310.jpg umzubenennen? Prost --K@rl (talk) 22:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Mach ruhig, das ist natürlich ein Tüppvehler. Das war ein Auftragswerk für den Miniaturenwettbewerb [6]. --Ralf Roleček 22:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-09-17-WikiLovesCocktails-Drink-Img0321 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-09-25-Graz-Ostbahnhof-RR2 6400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-08-31-Škoda 24Tr Irisbus Riga-RR2 4497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-03-16-Günther-Platter-RR7 8263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-09-01-Rīgas Starptautiskā Lidosta-RR2 4589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-08-30-Vakabulli Beach-Riga-RR2 3725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-08-30-Riga Daugavgrīva-RR2 3711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-09-01-Rīgas Starptautiskā Lidosta-RR2 4568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-02-15-Lietadlá Ministerstva vnútra slovenské republiky-RR2 7932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-09-02-Wahlkampfabschluß in Warnemünde-RR2 4847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 08:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-30 Cimitero Monumentale Milano RR2 7566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-02-15-Wien Erdberg Busterminal-RalfR-RR2 7866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-02-15-Wien-Volksgarten-RalfR-RR2 7831.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-12-17-Murinsel Graz-RalfR-DSCF9342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-11-16-Glasgow street scene-RR2 7263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically well done; we don't really need to worry about perspective here --Daniel Case 00:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ста́рый го́род Иерусали́ма-RalfR-DSCF7639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Did everything right --Daniel Case 00:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-03-30-Ста́рый го́род Иерусали́ма-RalfR-DSCF7654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fix dust spot in upper left corner of sky. Otherwise good quality in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 03:25, 29 March 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 08:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
I seem to have found another dust spot near the top of the picture around the middle, but it's very light and I'll leave it to you to deal with it. I'm OK with this picture now, assuming you take care of the additional dust spot I've now seen. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 20:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Diva-in-washington.jpg

File:Diva-in-washington.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A.Savin 16:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 14:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-10-27-Vista des de l'estàtua de Colom a Barcelona-WMA 2789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not totally sharp, but enough of it is. --Daniel Case 01:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-by-RalfR-124.jpg

File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-by-RalfR-124.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-by-RalfR-090.jpg

File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-by-RalfR-090.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-by-RalfR-088.jpg

File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-by-RalfR-088.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-by-RalfR-103.jpg

File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-by-RalfR-103.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

File:17-03-16-Jägermeister-Miniaturen-RR7 8310.jpg

File:17-03-16-Jägermeister-Miniaturen-RR7 8310.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-12-17-dresden-nacht-RalfR-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Alte Fotos aufräumen

Hallo Ralf, ich gehe mal davon aus, dass diese Fotos mal ursprünglich von dir auf de.wikipedia hochgeladen und dann hierher verschoben wurden. Ich würde gern source und author aufräumen. Ich würde sie so setzen wie in deinen letzten Uploads oder hast du einen anderen Wunsch? Grß, --Arnd (talk) 09:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Gerne! Geht sowas automatisch? --Ralf Roleček 09:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hallo zusammen: ja, das lässt sich halbautomatisch mit dem VisualFileChange-Werkzeug erledigen. Der kann u.a. einen Textersatz auf einer definierten Menge von Bildern durchführen. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 11:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Ich versuche es mal vorsichtig. Hoffentlich mache ich nix kaputt oder noch mehr Arbeit...--Ralf Roleček 11:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Ping

Moin Ralf. Das löppt so nich. Ein Ping wird nur gesendet, wenn in einem Abschnitt neben den Pings auch neu unterschrieben wird. Ob der Ping gesendet wurde, siehst du oben, wenn bei deiner Glocke die Hinweise in rot über gesendete Hinweise erscheinen. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Hmmm, ich habe nun neu unterschrieben, mein Glocke bleibt aber grau? --Ralf Roleček 21:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Ein Ping muss neu sein und neu unterschrieben werden, gleichzeitig und das im gleichen Abschnitt...
@Leithian: , @Ziko: , @Nightflyer: , @Der Wolf im Wald: , @Kenny McFly: , @Walter Rademacher: tragt ihr euch bitte verbindlich unter Commons:18. Fotoworkshop/Anmeldung ein? In hoffentlich erlaubter Vertretung für Ralf. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Danke! --Ralf Roleček 21:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Die fünf Pings sind raus. Ich selbst kann mich nicht anpingen, also sechs minus mich. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich war mir nicht sicher, ob es stattfindet, und mittlerweile habe ich einen anderen Termin an dem Wochenende. Sorry, und gern auf ein ander Mal. Ziko (talk) 21:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-04-17-Eberswalde Hauptbahnhof-RalfR-DSC 0041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 19:20, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-04-11-Poco-Siemensdamm-Berlin-RalfR-DSC 0157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-08-17-Infiniti Q30 RalfR-WP 20160817 10 57 49 Pro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-04-27-Eberswalde-RalfR-DSCF3010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-04-27-Radrennbahn-Forst-RalfR RR78734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-04-17-Eberswalde Hauptbahnhof-RalfR-RR7 8575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me, sun reflection does not disturb ---Zoppo59 20:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Deine Bilder vom Eberswalder Malverein

Ralf, ich würde ja gern für dich die Umbenennungen vornehmen, aber Du musst dich schon dazu äußern: Den Fehler muehla zu muehle ändern, aber wenn man schon den Dateinamen ändert, kann man ja noch weitere Änderungen durchführen (da alle Bilder in einer Kat. zu finden sind, ist es wie gesagt relativ leicht möglich):

  • Du fügst doch heutzutage eigentlich immer ein RalfR ein, das könnte man doch hier ans Ende setzen, oder? Oder lieber vor die laufende Nummer?
  • 120-mal heißt es -akt-muehla-, aber einmal -weiblicher akt-muehla-. Soll ich diese einzelne Datei an die anderen anpassen oder eher andersrum alle anderen dahingehend ändern?

Neben der potentiellen Namensänderung habe ich aber noch anderes gefunden, das unabhängig davon geändert werden müsste/sollte, hier mit Hilfe des VFC (die Zahlen weiß ich, weil ich den VFC schon mal angeworfen hatte):

  • 89-mal gibt es den Fehler Kuntverein.
  • 39-mal besteht die Beschreibung vollständig aus ktmalerei, zusätzlich 6-mal aus Aktmalerei. Das sollte zu {{de|Aktmalerei im Kunstverein [http://www.diemuehle.de/ "Die Mühle"], Eberswalde}} geändert werden wie bei den anderen Dateien.
  • Wenn man schon dabei ist, könnte die Autorenangabe und Genehmigung vereinheitlicht werden, also überall Deine Nutzervorlagen {{User:Ralf Roletschek/Autor}} und {{User:Ralf Roletschek/Autor3}} (oder doch …Autor2?). Allerdings gibt es schon einen Bereich mit weiteren Lizenzen.
  • Teilweise, aber nicht in allen Dateien, hast Du einen Text eingefügt, dass die abgebildeten Personen einer Veröffentlichung zugestimmt haben, teilweise hast Du aber (fehlerhaft) das Gegenteil eingefügt, also {{Personality rights/lang}} (richtig wäre {{Personality rights}}). Eines davon kann eigentlich nur stimmen. Übrigens gibt es, leider bisher nicht ins Deutsche übersetzt, eine Vorlage {{Consent}} für den Fall der Zustimmung. (Nachtrag: Ich hab die Vorlage übersetzt, die Doku aber noch nicht; man kann sich aber dort die Beispiele ansehen. — Speravir – 02:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC))

Also, sag mal was dazu, was ich für dich umsetzen soll/darf.

Ach so, es existiert noch eine ältere Datei File:Aktmodell - Muehle.jpg. Willst Du die auch ändern? Das dann aber individuell beantragen. — Speravir – 21:48, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Ich melde mich morgen mal, bin nur mit Telefon unterwegs --Ralf Roleček 11:57, 1 May 2017 (UTC)》
Erstmal Danke, daß du dir schon so viel Mühe gemacht hast. Ich dachte daran, die Bilder neu zu entwickeln - aber beim näheren Betrachten stellt sich raus, daß sie ja eigentlich alle unscharf sind. Und damit lohnt das doch auch alles nicht mehr? --Ralf Roleček 17:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Na ja, solange sie nicht gelöscht werden (und da sehe ich keinen Grund, so schlecht sind dann nicht), sollten die Fehler schon alle korrigiert werden, denke ich. Ich will nur wissen, wie Du es wünschst, obwohl ich mittlerweile bemerkt habe, dass Du die Bearbeitungen, von denen Du im Forum gesprochen hast, ja selbst mit VFC durchgeführt hattest. — Speravir – 18:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Ich habe da teilweise was gemacht aber so recht glücklich bin ich nicht damit, das Tool hatte bei mir lauter Aussetzer. Mit Bauklötzern wie personality rights beschäftige ich mich nicht weiter, dazu ändert sich sowas zu häufig. Ich verstehe nicht, warum Ein Baustein mal das eine und mal genau das Gegenteil aussagen kann. Gerade diese Fotos werden derart häufig editiert, daß ich schon nicht mehr nachsehe, was da eigentlich gemacht wurde. Die Hälfte verstehe ich mangels fehlendem Englisch nicht und den Rest ignoriere ich halt. Meine Anfrage war voreilig. Stepro hat Recht. Ich wollte alles neu machen aber das ist bei der Qualität Quatsch. --Ralf Roleček 09:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ralf, so hatte ich das eigentlich nicht gemeint. Ich finde, es sind ein paar dabei, die man beim Neuexport weglassen (und eigentlich auch löschen) könnte, weil sie zu unscharf sind und Du genug hast, so dass der Verlust nicht groß schadet. Die anderen sind dagegen doch nicht schlecht. Es müssen doch auch nicht immer alle Fotos knackscharf wie bei einer Blitzanlage sein, und können sie doch auch gar nicht. Aber das muss ich Dir ja nun wirklich nicht erklären. ;-) --Stepro (talk) 20:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Naja, ich bin enttäuscht. Von mir. Hab damals unbedingt niedrige ISO durchdrücken wollen, das war falsch. Man lernt aus seinen Fehlern ;) Heute würde ich das nicht mehr hochladen. --Ralf Roleček 20:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Wie du vermutlich bemerkt hast, habe ich die Fehler korrigiert. Bei den Dateinamen habe ich kein RalfR eingefügt. Die Sache mit {{Personality rights}} schaue ich mir noch an. Du kannst dir jetzt mal {{Consent}} ansehen (runterscrollen und Beispiele vergleichen), ich habe die Vorlage ins Deutsche übersetzt. — Speravir – 16:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Danke dir! Das mit Consent ist mir neu, muß ich mir notieren. Das trifft auf diese Bilder zu. Wäre ja auch komisch, ich habe keine Tarnkappe, um dort ungesehen herumzuspazieren ;) --Ralf Roleček 16:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-04-27-Radrennbahn-Forst-RalfR RR78735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-02-Quickborn-Bahnhof RR78876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-02-Quickborn RR79008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-04-27-Eberswalde-RalfR-DSCF3038-3042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment There are some dark spots in the sky, especially on left side. Is it possible to remove? --Zoppo59 17:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done you're right. --Ralf Roletschek 21:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC) QI for me Zoppo59 17:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-06-Miniaturen RR79033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some noise but IMO acceptable. Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:44, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-06-Miniaturen RR79036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-10-Pressetermin-Weissensee-RalfR RR79416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Manfred Kuzel 04:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Ralf Roletschek, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-18-Manfred Dachner RR79530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportGood quality.--Manfred Kuzel 07:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-18-Jacqueline Bernhardt RR79524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-18-Sylvia Bretschneider RR79585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportGood quality.--Manfred Kuzel 07:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-10-Pressetermin-Weissensee-RalfR RR79319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-04-17-Eberswalde Hauptbahnhof-RalfR-DSC 0227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 04:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-27-Flughafen Berlin TXL- RR71200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-27-Flughafen Berlin TXL-a RR71294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO, good quality --Rabax63 22:25, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-27-Flughafen Berlin TXL-a RR71101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 21:39, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-18-Christiane Berg-a RR79568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me--Manfred Kuzel 15:37, 27 May 2017 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-03-17-Wien-DSC 0014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 07:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-23-Fotoflug Barnim-a RR70678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 10:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-28-Stettin-b RR71418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 20:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-28-Stettin-b RR71419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 20:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-28-Stettin-b RR71398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 20:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-04-27-Eberswalde-RalfR-DSCF3009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me.--Manfred Kuzel 05:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-23-Fotoflug Barnim-a RR70814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 14:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-01-Flughafen Bratislava RR71735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 20:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-01-Flughafen Bratislava RR71732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-28-Stettin-bDSC 1774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-01-Flughafen Bratislava RR71734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-01-Flughafen Bratislava RR71733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-01-Flughafen Bratislava RR71731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-01-Flughafen Bratislava RR71727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 05:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-28-Stettin-b RR71405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 11:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-20-Paulskirche Schwerin Ausblick RR70096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-20-Landeshauptarchiv Schwerin a RR70215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-23-Fotoflug Barnim-a RR71035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May be resolution could be better, but IMO the exposure time is too long for these kind of photographs. I'd photo flights in 2014. and the images would be better with 1/2000 s or shorter. --XRay 05:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-23-Fotoflug Barnim-a RR71007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May be resolution could be better, but IMO the exposure time is too long for these kind of photographs. --XRay 05:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-27-Flughafen Berlin TXL-a RR71292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zoppo59 05:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-09-Maserati Levante-RalfR-IMG 20170609 162353 434a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy but OK for me. --Basotxerri 05:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-09-Maserati Levante-RalfR-IMG 20170609 161849 314a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-09-Maserati Levante-RalfR-IMG 20170609 161916 076a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 06:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-28-Stettin-bDSC 1798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-01-Flughafen Bratislava RR71725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. @Moroder I can't see any noise, with ISO 200 there shouldn't be noise --J. Lunau 14:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circle line train C69 at Westminster interior view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Wenn Du die Perspektive links (Tür!) korrigieren kannst, ist das für mich ein QI.--Manfred Kuzel 06:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Puh, schwierig. Der Zug steht geneigt in dieser Station, die verläuft in einer Kurve. Habs man anhand der Tür und dem Westminster-Schild versucht. --Ralf Roletschek 08:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Na passt doch!--Manfred Kuzel 09:07, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

File:15-08-12-Model-Rotkäppchen-RalfR-N3S 0778.jpg

File:15-08-12-Model-Rotkäppchen-RalfR-N3S 0778.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Petrus Adamus (talk) 19:54, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

File names

For future uploads you might like to follow the POLICY at Commons:File naming and Commons:File renaming. Excellent images, by the way, just crap names.--Petebutt (talk) 09:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Die Dateinamen sind gut. Wenn du gerne verschiebst, dann lade eigene Bilder dafür hoch. Finger weg von meinen Bildern! --Ralf Roleček 10:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
I removed the first para as I was confused with someone that has a similar username, but my comments of file naming stand!!--Petebutt (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
  1. Commons:File naming does not seem to be a POLICY: "This page is a proposed Commons guideline, policy, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. References or links to this page should not describe it as 'policy' ."
  2. Ralf's file naming is improvable, yes. But there is usually no really valid reason to rename them just for matter of taste. --Smial (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Foto File:Landtagssitzung Schwerin 19-06-2013 by Ralf Roletschek 05.JPG

Bitte bei Bildbeschreibung ergänzen wer neben Manuela Schwesig sitzt.--Falkmart (talk) 15:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Ich frag sie nächste Woche. --Ralf Roleček 18:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Permission to use an image

My name is Linda Pope and I am creating an online sustainability series of courses. I am currently working on the one about water. I would like to include the image of the fish-downspout as an example to be creative and make the rain and our neighborhoods beautiful. Thank you! Linda (LCPope@gmail.com). — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.100.198.165 (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

I don't understand you. --Ralf Roleček 19:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Sie möchte ein Foto von Dir nutzen, auf dem ein Fisch als Wasserspeier zu sehen ist. --Stepro (talk) 19:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Danke! *grübel* Helsinki? St. Pölten? Ich stehe auf dem Schlauch. Which photo? --Ralf Roleček 19:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-ß7-06-SVKE RR74965.jpg

Hallo Ralf.

bin wirklich mit Dir! Aber was soll ein solch Bildtitel?

Das nennt man heute noch so, wie es damals hieß. Die ständigen Namenswechsel nach der Wende... weiß doch keiner, wie das Werk gerade heißt. Das "ß" ist ein Ausrutscher, ich wollte die Null daneben treffen. --Ralf Roleček 19:42, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Tja die Eberswalder Klößchen, da kommen bei mir Jugenderinnerungen. Kloß schreib man ja auch mit ß ;-) Umbenennen kannst Du ja selbst. LG Hystrix (talk) 13:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Neee, umbenennen kann ich nicht. Ist ja nun auch wirklich nicht so wichtig. --Ralf Roleček 15:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Doch, Dateischubser biste seit dem 13. Juno, vergeben von User:Daphne Lantier, hat wohl nur vergessen Dich zu informieren. Hystrix (talk) 16:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Ok, hab ich mal geschuppst. --Ralf Roleček 16:29, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition. Quality high enough for Q1, but it might have been a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 20:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74377-PANORAMA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition of daily life, quality high enough for Q1 but you might reduce the contrast between light and shadow --Michielverbeek 13:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74396.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Schick, ...

... Dein Zweitwagen. :-) Stepro (talk) 20:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Ist nur was fürs Wochenende. Der Kofferraum ist zu klein. --Ralf Roleček 20:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-23-Fotoflug Barnim-a RR70424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-23-Üdersee RR70407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. A geo location would be nice. --XRay 10:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-23-Üdersee RR70402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-23-Üdersee RR70396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Courtesy notice

We edit conflicted on this QIC. PumpkinSky talk 22:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

ok, no problem. --Ralf Roleček 22:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Martinlaakso-Myyrmäki-Vantaa RR73870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-30-M R Štefánik Airport-DSC 1825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Difficult to check the verticals, but I think it's a Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Martinlaakso-Myyrmäki-Vantaa RR73867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-15-Tanvald nadrazi-IMG 20170715 130559 443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 08:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-15-Tanvald nadrazi-IMG 20170715 131053 514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Frage

Mahlzeit. Bin gerade bei den QI-Diskussion drüber gestolpert. Was verbirgt sich eigentlich hinter Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa? Habe gerade keinen Plan. Meistens nimmst du ja Ortsnamen, oder? Grüße aus Cottbus. -- DerFussi 09:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Ich benutze gern (aber überhaupt nicht durchgängig) Bezeichnungen in der Landessprache. Es bedeutet grob "hauptstädtische Straßenszene" oder "Straßenszene in der Hauptstadt". Ich nehme Datum, Ort, teilweise Objekt - und hinten den originalen Dateinamen. Letzteres, um auch RAW wiederzufunden, die bleiben nämlich prinzipiell unanmgetastet. Gruß aus Eberswalde zurück. --Ralf Roleček 09:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
OK, Danke. Dann gibt es auch keinen Grund über den Dateinamen zu meckern. Ungewöhnlich, aber ok. Würde ich auch einen Umbennungsantrag abelehnen. Aber das hatten wir ja schon mal. Hatten sich die Umbenenner eigentlich durchgesetzt? Oder heißen deine Dateien noch so?-- DerFussi
Insgesamt wurden mir geschätzt 1000 Dateien umbenannt. Ich habe das nicht genau im Blick. Die überwiegende Mehrheit sind Fotos aus dem Umfeld Flugzeuge. Deshalb lade ich eben keine Bilder von oder aus Flugzeugen hoch - bzw. nur in Ausnahmefällen. Und dabei sind diese Fotos keine Auanahme. Bevor nun Frze, Uli Elch oder andere Aktivisten wieder meine Dateien umbenennen, bleiben sie auf meiner Festplatte. Wenn ich ein Flugzeug benenne, dann ist für mich in erster Linie der Ort, dann der Typ interessant. Das Portal Luftfahrt möchte aber alles nach Zulassungsnummern sortieren, umbenennen. Wieder andere interessieren sich für das Logo am Seitenleitwerk, das Wetter oder was auch immer. Kann ja alles in Beschreibung, Kategorien und Wikidata rein, nur der Dateiname ist kein Ersatz für Description & Category. Manchmal mache ich Fotos auch einfach nur für Wikiversity oder Wikivoyage. Aber hier haben viele nur die Brille Wikipedia auf. Hier habe ich 15 Minuten im strömenden Regen stehend gewartet, um die im Text genannten zwei Buslinien gemeinsam auf einem Bild darzustellen. Dabei ist es scheißegal, welcher Bustyp da dargestellt wird, die Linien wären jedoch interessant. Der Dateiname "Helsinki-Vantaa Flughafen" ist passend. Wären das Flugzeuge, dann wären jetzt Bustyp und Nummernschild im Dateinamen. Bei Flugzeugen muß ja unbedingt das "Nummernschild" in den Dateinamen (also die Zulassungsnummer). Ihnen reicht die Kategorie nicht. Dann sollen sie doch selbst die entsprechenden Fotos machen. --Ralf Roleček 10:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-15-Tanvald nadrazi-IMG 20170715 130752 287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-15-Tanvald nadrazi-IMG 20170715 131034 745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Martinlaakso-Myyrmäki-Vantaa RR73868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Threatening but good -- Spurzem 21:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-01-Flughafen Bratislava RR71738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Metro Kiew RR74298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-21-Heiliger See Sandkrug-DSCF6052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Martinlaakso-Myyrmäki-Vantaa RR73864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-04-05-Skoda Museum Mladá Boleslav by RalfR-188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-15-Tanvald nadrazi-IMG 20170715 130850 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Martinlaakso-Myyrmäki-Vantaa RR73851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The crop is a bit tight but IMO the image is OK. However, could you add some sign-related category, please? --Basotxerri 06:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 12:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa RR73789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa RR73773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa RR73730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa RR73768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-08-17-Infiniti Q30 RalfR-WP 20160817 10 58 24 Pro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:14, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-09-Maserati Levante-RalfR-IMG 20170609 162005 152a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-27-Flughafen Berlin TXL-a RR71100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-21-Heiliger See Sandkrug-DSCF6064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Martinlaakso-Myyrmäki-Vantaa RR73847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice name in the EXIF data. ;-) May be better with geo location. -- XRay 19:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Very noisy, could you clean it up a bit?--Peulle 20:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 22:23, 24 July 2017 (UTC) Looks OK. --Peulle 13:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

File:14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-138.jpg

File:14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-138.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 18:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

File:14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-139.jpg

File:14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-139.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 18:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-28-GmoaKeller-Wien-Am-Heumarkt-25-DSC 2243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-28-GmoaKeller-Wien-Am-Heumarkt-25-DSC 2246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Wheel war

Hallo Ralf, zu Deiner Anmerkung. Der Begriff wheel war geht auf den UNIX-Bereich zurück. Unter UNIX gibt es den sogenannten Super-User, der uneingeschränkt alle Rechte (sprich Admin-Rechte) besitzt. Typischerweise arbeitet man aber nicht die gesamte Zeit als Super-User, sondern als normaler Benutzer, der dann gelegentlich Super-User-Rechte (auch Root-Rechte genannt) in Anspruch nimmt. Die Gruppe derjenigen, die das können, wird gelegentlich wheel genannt – wobei damit das Lenkrad bzw. bei Schiffen das Ruder gemeint ist. Somit ist ein wheel war keine Hin und Her mit normalen Edits, die jeder ausführen kann, sondern ein Hin und Her mit Root-Rechten (bzw. bei uns hier Adminrechten). Zusammenfassend gesagt wird H-stt in dem Desysop-Antrag vorgeworfen, Admin-Aktionen anderer ohne Rücksprache eigenmächtig revertiert zu haben. Dies wird normalerweise nicht gerne gesehen und als wheel war bezeichnet. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! War mir echt neu. Zu meiner UNIX-Zeit (bis 1992) dachte im Traum niemand daran, mit SU irgendwelchen Unfug anzustellen. Bei uns war es sogar so, daß SU als Befehl, als Login und Root noch verschiedene Berechtigungen beinhaltete. Die Disk. ist mir zu kompliziert geworden, um da was beizutragen. Ich meine, der Fehler ist in den vorschnellen Löschungen zu suchen. --Ralf Roleček 15:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Hallo Ralf, es wird hier so manches vorschnell gelöscht – das ist einfach der Masse der zu löschenden Dateien geschuldet (jeden Tag ca. 2000) und den wenigen Admins, die ein Großteil davon Tag für Tag erledigen. Dennoch wird gerne gesehen, dass Admin-Entscheidungen nicht ad-hoc aufgehoben werden. Es gibt die Möglichkeit, mit dem löschenden Admin vorher darüber zu sprechen und ggf. COM:UDEL zu bemühen. Und leider wurden auch Dateien restauriert, bei denen das überhaupt nicht in Ordnung war wie bei Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sly Mill.jpg. Die Datei hätte schon damals im Jahr 2009 nie von en:wp nach Commons transferiert werden dürfen – ohne Source-Link, Publikationsinfos, Urheber etc. Niemand kann da den urheberrechtlichen Status überprüfen. Und warum kommt H-stt auf diese Datei? Offenbar, weil Ozark-Plateau auf der Beobachtungsliste steht, wo das Bild benutzt wurde. Wenn das Bild tatsächlich um 1860 entstand, wäre wohl Gemeinfreiheit anzunehmen. Aber diese Info war nie bei der Dateibeschreibung, und auch Hinweise auf die Herkunft haben gefehlt, die hier Pflicht sind. Und statt einer Diskussion kommt dann da nur der Kommentar “Hands off!”. Von Admins wird da anderes erwartet. Probleme sehe ich bei den genannten Links durchaus, das Desysop-Verfahren kam meines Erachtens jedoch viel zu schnell. Ich hätte mir da erhofft, dass mehr auf dem Wege der Verständigung gesucht wird. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 17:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 3282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 2819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 3883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4719 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

File:2015.07.04.-06-Eilenburg Ost--Gemeiner Schwefelporling-2.jpg

File:2015.07.04.-06-Eilenburg Ost--Gemeiner Schwefelporling-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hockei (talk) 09:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-09-29-Jorsand-N3S 9248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 22:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-09-29-Sylt Jorsand-N3S 9266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 22:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4720 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Wheelwar

Hallo Ralf, ein Wheelwar ist dasselbe wie ein Editwar, weil sich die Versionen im Kreis drehen wie ein Rad (wobei ich nicht weiß, ob der Vorwurf an h-stt zutrifft). Es grüßt Agathenon (talk) 15:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4740 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4757-PANORAMA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Normally I don't like extreme short lenses and panoramas but this image looks very good -- Spurzem 16:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4772 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 3881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beutiful photo, quality just ok.--ArildV 18:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 3155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-09-29-Rømø Sylt Jorsand-N3S 9248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-27-Flughafen Berlin TXL-a RR71154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4895-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz RR70533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 09:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz RR70534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-15-Tanvald nadrazi-IMG 20170715 130812 280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4967 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 5028 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz RR70441.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz RR70447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A sphere photo, well done, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 15:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz RR70532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz RR70601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz RR70586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz RR70510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:57, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Tangufell-RalfR-DSC 2926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-27-Flughafen Berlin TXL-a RR71109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Despite the cropped wing an interesting image and good quality -- Spurzem 15:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-27-Flughafen Berlin TXL-a RR71127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Þingvellir-RalfR-DSC 2676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Geysir-RalfR-DSC 2795.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz RR70618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Gullfoss-RalfR-DSC 2912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Geysir-RalfR-DSC 2819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 16:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-09-29-Sand im Meer-N3S 9180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Þingvellir-RalfR-DSC 2668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy and unsharp in places, but good enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Gullfoss-RalfR-DSC 2883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Exciting! -- Ikan Kekek 21:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 11:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Gullfoss-RalfR-DSC 2883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I really like these misty waterfall pictures. -- Ikan Kekek 18:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Þingvellir-RalfR-DSC 2675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Foreground is unsharp, but that's a small thing, considering how spectacular this photo is. That said, if you decide to nominate it at FPC, you might want to consider cropping to the bottom of the hillock. -- Ikan Kekek 18:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-21-Schmetterlingsschnitt-329 RR71584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 20:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Tangufell-RalfR-DSC 2927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Foreground is not sharp, so please a bottom crop --Michielverbeek 06:40, 20 September 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 16:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC) A Q1 for me --Michielverbeek 06:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-06-Cafe Wildau-Schorfheide RR74804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK. --C messier 19:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Gullfoss-RalfR-DSC 2919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-21-Wiki-Loves-Mett-1010-DSC 5615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --ArildV 09:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa RR73684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-30-M R Štefánik Airport-DSC 1824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Left side is leaning inward (see the note). Image needs perspective correction --Halavar 11:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 11:49, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 19:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 02:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-29-Hotel Mercure Potsdam RalfR RR75952 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Gullfoss-RalfR-DSC 2919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-21-Wiki-Loves-Mett-1010-DSC 5615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --ArildV 09:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa RR73684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-30-M R Štefánik Airport-DSC 1824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Left side is leaning inward (see the note). Image needs perspective correction --Halavar 11:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 11:49, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 19:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-islcanus-RalfR-DSC 4123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 02:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-29-Hotel Mercure Potsdam RalfR RR75952 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ralf,

I'm contacting you about the use of your images in my website (www.dixon.es).

I've been working on the website for some months now, and I have got to admit that the different copyright and licensing agreements under which fotos are made available via Wikicommons seem a bit of a labyrinth to me, hence my contacting you directly.

If you have a look at the website you'll see that I've added some of your images ("https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=58540679"/"https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=30516296"/"https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=31844669"/"https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=15930537"/"https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10392720"/"https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=59555857") to a slider on the home page.

I'm not a programmer, and fighting with websites is a real trial for me. However, I've got this far, and I'd like to know how you'd like me to proceed with a credit (assuming that you're ok about my using the fotos in the first place, of course).

I did initially add credits to the fotos themselves, but they looked really poor in the standard slider format that I've used, so I removed them and added a "Credits" link on the main menu, with intention of listing all the fotos that I've used along with the corresponding credit and link.

So, before I go ahead, I'd like to have your feedback about the idea, and of course about the use of your fotos.

Look forward to hearing from you

--Sattamassagassa (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa RR73788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-01-Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa RR73621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, danke --Poco a poco 06:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-05-Þingvellir-Öxarárfoss-RalfR-DSC 2707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-15-Tanvald nadrazi-IMG 20170715 130923 827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 3224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-12-Sommerfest-Landtag-MV RR75507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp --Basile Morin 04:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-06-09-Maserati Levante-RalfR-IMG 20170609 162254 028a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Geysir-RalfR-DSC 2831.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments HDR is a bit overdone in the sky, but nevertheless a QI to me --Carschten 01:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-09-23-Fotoflug-Nordsee-RalfR-N3S 8948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-22-Chorin-RalfR-DSCF9014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Although this image is already promoted, you may like to eliminate two disturbing dustspots - see annotations in image --PtrQs 00:15, 5 October 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 05:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-24-Fotoflug-Barnim-DSCF6577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 19:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-24-Fotoflug-Barnim-DSCF6438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, composition and EV. --ArildV 17:19, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Þingvellir-RalfR-DSC 2674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Lovely image. --Peulle 13:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-07-24-Fotoflug-Barnim-DSCF6378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 3219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-09-24-Steyr-430-RR2 6195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. BTW: Filename OK? --XRay 18:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC) OK oops, Tippfehler - behoben. --Ralf Roletschek 19:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-09-06-Kürbisfeld-Steiermark-RalfR-IMG 20170906 145344 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Þingvellir-RalfR-DSC 2679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautful dark clouds, but it might have ben a bit sharper. IMO an improvement if you would do a bottom crop and cut a bit of the right (unsharp) part --Michielverbeek 17:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-31-Wien-Schwechat-DSC 1897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-31-Billa-Wien-Schwechat-RalfR RR71501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-31-Billa-Wien-Schwechat-RalfR-aDSC 1865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition. --Peulle 14:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich!

Hallo Ralf Roletschek!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 7.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Ort in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinem möglich war.

Die 561 besten Bilder wurden in den letzten Wochen von einer Vorjury ausgesucht, die Du dir hier anschauen kannst - vielleicht sind auch Bilder von Dir dabei! :-) Eine Jury wird nun bis Mitte November die zehn besten Bilder aussuchen, die Preisträger werden danach von uns verständigt.

Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikimedia-Projekte bebilderst! Im 2. Halbjahr 2018 wird WikiDaheim wahrscheinlich wieder stattfinden - wir würden uns freuen, wenn du dann wieder dabei wärst :-) Solltest Du Fragen haben, so kannst Du Dich gerne an wikidaheim@wikimedia.at wenden.

(Braveheart für das Team von WikiDaheim, 11:47, 2. Nov 2017 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-31-Bipa-Rennweg RR71523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:48, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-31-Wien-Schwechat-DSC 1900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK.--Famberhorst 16:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-31-Wien-Schwechat-DSC 1904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK. --C messier 10:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Makuladegeneration-2.jpg

File:Makuladegeneration-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 MaxxL - talk 15:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-05-31-Wien-Schwechat RR71507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

File:13-03-19-landtag-niedersachsen-by-RalfR-146.jpg

File:13-03-19-landtag-niedersachsen-by-RalfR-146.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 10:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Taxi-Glasgow RR70031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Sufficient quality and nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 23:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Taxi-Glasgow RR70033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:18, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Taxi-Glasgow RR79897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-15-Glasgow-Subway RR70174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:17, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-15-Glasgow-Subway RR70173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 09:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-15-Glasgow-Subway RR70167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Taxi-Glasgow RR70066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:37, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-15-Glasgow-Subway RR70163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please add personality rights warning.--Peulle 09:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 10:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC) OK. --Peulle 17:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Bus-Glasgow RR70224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 20:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Bus-Glasgow RR79878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The left crop is a little wide, but OK. --Peulle 16:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Taxi-Glasgow RR70214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Taxi-Glasgow RR79895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but I would have liked the front to be in focus as well, so maybe increase the DoF a little bit? --Peulle 23:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Bus-Glasgow RR70060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 12:51, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Bus-Glasgow RR70067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 12:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Bus-Glasgow RR70220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Bus-Glasgow RR79879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:55, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-BuFahrrad-Glasgow RR79904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-BuFahrrad-Glasgow RR70143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Fahrzeug-Glasgow RR70201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-15-Glasgow-Subway RR70137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Bus-Glasgow RR79912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Pudelek 10:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-14-Taxi-Glasgow RR70213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-15-Glasgow-Subway RR70165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little wonky with the perspective, but that appears natural. Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-11-15-Glasgow-Subway RR70199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks like an ad (in the positive sense). Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 15:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-04-BCN-TXL-RalfR-DSCF0799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Þingvellir-RalfR-DSC 2678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Right crop is improvable, but ok to me as QI --Poco a poco 12:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Gullfoss-RalfR-DSC 2885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 14:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-05-Island-Auto-RalfR-DSC 2840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-03-Hospital de Sant Pau (BCN)-RalfR-DSCF0472.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-03-Hospital de Sant Pau (BCN) Pavelló de Sant Rafael-RalfR-DSCF0553-PANORAMA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:54, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-03-Hospital de Sant Pau (BCN)-RalfR-DSCF0436-PANORAMA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, although a small perspective correction on the left would make it even better --Basile Morin 15:16, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-04-Aeropuerto de Barcelona-El Prat-RalfR-DSCF0690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I love the pile of sleeping people on the left! Picture is quite noisy though, especially when I look at the guy on his phone. Have you tried removing some noise already?--Trougnouf 09:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 09:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! --Trougnouf 12:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-04-Aeropuerto de Barcelona-El Prat-RalfR-DSCF0697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Goethe (Stieler 1828).jpg

" You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States." - so sagt {{PD-Art|PD-old-100}} - also, wenn PD-US 'ueberflussig' sei, was soll man tun? --Smerus (talk) 19:05, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Stieler ist 1858 gestorben und damit 70 Jahre tot. Was der Baustein will, weiß ich nicht. Mit dem PD-US kommt die nächste Warnmeldung und sowas verunsichert Nachnutzer, da in diesem Fall das Urheberrecht klar abgelaufen ist. --Ralf Roleček 19:10, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-13-Markus-Wallner-RalfR-DSC 0797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good shot and got quality -- Spurzem 11:51, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-13-Markus-Wallner-RalfR-DSC 0815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:51, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Bregenz-RalfR-DSCF0880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good picture, though everything appears to be leaning a tiny bit to the right, can you fix that? (something like a 1 degree rotation and -.15 vertical lens shift straightens up the buildings)-Trougnouf 13:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC) also the category should be more precise, perhaps Transport in Bregenz or something within that category--Trougnouf 14:52, 18 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 14:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! --Trougnouf 15:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Schaan-RalfR-DSCF0885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Besser, aber schon wieder kein Landtagsprojektfoto. :( --Granada 10:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Sterling Hayden, Der Attentäter und Asphalt-Dschungel

Hallo Ralf Roletschek, dürfte ich Sie bitten einen Blick auf de:Benutzerin Diskussion:Lotje#Sterling Hayden zu werfen und auch hier bei Mutter Erde bezüglich dieses themas (Copyright discussion on German Wikipedia)? Vielleicht können Sie mir beibringen was ich da falsch mache. Es handelt sich insbesondere um

  1. dieses Bild von Sterling Hayden mit der Beschreibung (Description) A search for renewal was conducted at copyright.gov. There were no listing which pertained to any magazines with "Screenland" in their title. A search for any renewals by the publisher, Affiliated Magazines, turned up no listings for the publishing company. There's no evidence of continuing copyright on the magazine
  2. dieses Bild von Sterling Hayden --> Commons:media of the day for 19 February 2016
  3. diese Bild mit Marilyn Monroe und Sterling Hayden

Wieso können diese Bilder nicht auf der de:Wikipedia, obwohl deutlich keine copyright gilt in den USA? Lotje (talk) 13:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

In Europa gibt es kein Copyright. Hier gibt es Urheberrecht und das verbietet die Benutzung. --Ralf Roleček 14:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Schade um die viele Mühe der Benützer und Benützerinnen hier, wirklich schade. Lotje (talk) 17:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-14-Madrid-RalfR-DSCF0989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-14-Flughafen-Madrid-Barajas-RalfR-DSCF0948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-14-Flughafen-Madrid-Barajas-RalfR-DSCF1008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 Comment - Great composition, near-FP level, but might need just a bit of tweaking before an FPC nomination, maybe to selectively denoise and/or sharpen - I'll leave it to you what to do if you choose to nominate it. -- Ikan Kekek 06:40, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Plaça d'Espanya-RalfR-DSCF0348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Schaan-RalfR-DSCF0895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-14-Madrid-RalfR-DSCF0988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 12:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Plaça d'Espanya-RalfR-DSCF0386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Cerdanyola-RalfR-DSCF0155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Pudelek 13:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Cerdanyola-RalfR-DSCF0161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-14-Madrid-RalfR-DSCF0973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Right front wheel on the dark side. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-04-Cerdanyola-RalfR-DSCF0652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Cerdanyola-RalfR-DSCF0156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-04-Aeropuerto de Barcelona-El Prat-RalfR-DSCF0714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ralf can you remouve dust/oil spots in the sky?--Սարո Հովհաննիսյան 12:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 13:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC) it's not total fixed, please remouve all spots --Սարո Հովհաննիսյան 22:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC) but now? --Ralf Roletschek 22:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Good quality, thank you --Սարո Հովհաննիսյան 14:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

* Happy Holidays 2018, Ralf Roletschek/Archive! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 25 December 2017 (UTC)   

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Plaça d'Espanya-RalfR-DSCF0343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality although there is not much of the square here --Poco a poco 11:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-04-BCN-TXL-RalfR-DSCF0793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment - Dust spots must be removed from the clouds atop Mont Blanc. -- Ikan Kekek 10:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 13:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 Support - Good quality now. -- Ikan Kekek 02:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-12-SXF-KEF-RalfR-DSC 2322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Others would call it a "drunken" (sic) perspective, but I like it. It needs an additional cat, though --Poco a poco 12:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-04-BCN-TXL-RalfR-DSCF0792.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality higth enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 09:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-Fahrkarte-Spanien-IMG 20171218 211138 447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-03-Cerdanyola-RalfR-DSCF0595-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good picture, needs better categorization --Trougnouf 00:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 00:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-01-Estació Montcada Bifurcació-RalfR-DSCF0171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-14-Flughafen-Madrid-Barajas-RalfR-DSCF1013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some motion blur is fine, but how about some (more?) noise reduction? -- Ikan Kekek 07:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 11:11, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 Support - Seems acceptable to me now. -- Ikan Kekek 04:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-12-SXF-KEF-RalfR-DSC 2323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-04-Arnarseturshraun-RalfR-DSC 2400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-13-Markus-Wallner-RalfR-DSC 0796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-04-Blaue-Lagune-RalfR-DSC 2406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-04-Blaue-Lagune-RalfR-DSC 2453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-04-Blaue-Lagune-RalfR-DSC 2426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-12-SXF-KEF-RalfR-DSC 2330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ralf_Roletschek/Archive/2017&oldid=279740283"