User talk:Pudelek/Archive5

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starý znak města Jeseník.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A geotag would be helpful. -- H005 00:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)  Info done --Pudelek 20:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC) Thanks. A bit too much shadow in the top end but acceptable iMHO. -- H005 21:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galeria Sztuki Polskiej XIX wieku w Sukiennicach - sala Chełmońskiego 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice annotations. --Andrei Stroe 12:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeseník - Katovna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 12:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KWK Bolesław Śmiały 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, ok quality.--Ankara 18:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galeria Sztuki Polskiej XIX wieku w Sukiennicach - sala Siemiradzkiego 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The ceiling might be overblown but I think it is hard to avoid in this case. I'd say it's a QI. --Ximonic 09:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galeria Sztuki Polskiej XIX wieku w Sukiennicach sala Michałkowskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent --Ximonic 09:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galeria Sztuki Polskiej XIX wieku w Sukiennicach - sala Siemiradzkiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight motion blur of person in green shirt, but otherwise good. --Jovianeye 12:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kotor and Boka kotorska - view from city wall.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kotor and Boka kotorska - view from city wall.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gród na górze Birów 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me. Perhaps chromatic aberrations, but very little important to me (I add notes, you can delete the notes. New version) --Lmbuga 23:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Krakau - Fort 52 Borek - brama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ianare 23:27, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Wättrisch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 13:06, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trains in České Budějovice (Budweis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Added night category. --Ikar.us 16:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DK 81 - Ober Lazisk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinkreuz neben Mellendorf (Schlesien).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. But what do you mean with "conciliation" cross ?--Jebulon 15:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Versöhnungs Kreuz? ;-) --Berthold Werner 14:46, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gród na górze Birów 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The vertical lines of the door aren't straight. chromatic aberrations (see notes, you can delete the notes). The stones of the floor are overexposed. Sorry --Lmbuga 22:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC) Sorry, new revision and I'm not sure: perhaps the vertical lines of the door are straights, I'm not sure. Sorry--Lmbuga 23:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC) New version --Pudelek 07:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC) Good to me--Lmbuga 10:05, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfgangturm - Herrleinberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok--Ankara 11:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christian Dierig AG - Langenbielau 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Proskau - Proskowski CoA.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel in Oleszna (Langenöls).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight CA and a bit grainy but a good composition. A horizontal framing with more of the cemetery might have been interesting too. --Elekhh 03:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obří skály by Pudelek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--Ankara 08:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanová dráha Ramzová - Šerák - II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsdorf (Lower Silesia), Train Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good winter mood. --Ikar.us 22:14, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Very nice indeed! -- MJJR 20:00, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Proskau - St. Georg Kirche.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The right lines aren't stright. There are little green and violet chromatic aberrations (I can work it if you want)--Lmbuga 23:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC) New version with less chromatic aberrations and with correction of perspective. You can revert the version if you want--Lmbuga 23:11, 30 June 2011 (UTC) New version is OK, but in my opinion perspective was good --Pudelek 09:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC)  Support Small issue with sharpness at the tower top, but overall good quality. --H005 10:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sosnowiec Jęzor - dworzec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Geocoding would be helpful. There seem to be many railway installations there. --Ikar.us 23:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Śląskie Kamienie / Dívči Kameny.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Neutral Best available, but lacks a scale. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope and useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokomotiva 182 v Polsku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 17:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chata Jiřího na Šeraku - panorama.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I love this picture, but it's got too aggressive denoising and sharpening. Don't you think the ground, dirty and gravel look very odd? The far buildings are also very weird by they are just tiny specks we can ignore them. Fred Hsu 01:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)  Comment I know, that isn't perfect, but I think that quality is sufficient --Pudelek 09:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC) Acceptable IMHO. --H005 22:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurace Rejvíz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments some CA, but QI IMO --Carschten 15:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taraxacum officinale from Silesia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 15:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Proskau - Friedhof.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Třebíč - Karlovo náměstí - dům z hodinami.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Warfieldian 21:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Use of Rustkammer, Dresden Armor

Hello,

On the page for one of your pictures (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:R%C3%BCstkammer,_Dresden_-_armour.jpg), according to the license it says that the picture is available for commercial use (under the Sharealike 3.0 Unported license), though you do ask for credit (which I am more than happy to give), and also to send you a message about the use.

I'm currently writing a short, supplemental rulebook for the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, tentatively entitled "The Ebon Vault: Adamant Armors," which will detail a number of magical armors for players to use. I would like to use this piece as one of the artworks in the book. I would provide your name in a caption below the image, as well as making the image and caption a link to the wikipedia page (or, if you have another, related page it could link to, that would also be great). Finally, if you'd be interested, I'd be happy to give you a free copy of the finished product.

Thank you and have a great day, Alex Riggs ariggs@necromancers-online.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bazilika svatého Prokopa - Portal Paradisi - část.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Gzzz 14:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Přípojný vůz 010 u stanice Černý Kříž (Schwarzes Kreutz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Krakau - Fort Bielany 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice composition --Carschten 09:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Krakau - Fort Bielany 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice composition --Carschten 09:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Třebíčská židovská čtvrť - Tiché náměstí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really sharp, but ok. --H005 21:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zámek Třebíč - nová brána.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --H005 21:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreisesselberg (Třístoličník) - Hochstein 3 - Kapelle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreisesselberg (Třístoličník) - Hochstein 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreisesselberg (Třístoličník) - Hochstein 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trojmezí GER-CZE-AUT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 09:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Berlin Gate (Kostrzyn nad Odrą).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreisesselberg (Třístoličník) - Hochstein 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA but good QI.--Jebulon 18:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreisesselberg (Třístoličník) - Hochstein - panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support a little underexposed, but interesting picture --Archaeodontosaurus 05:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Šumava (Böhmerwald) - hraničník.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trojmezí GER-CZE-AUT 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality and high encyclopedic value, but needs geocoding! -- MJJR 08:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC) Geocode is easy to find in this case, and if it is always recommended, it is not a mandatory. IMO, this picture is a QI.--Jebulon 09:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nová Pec (Neuofen) - železniční stanice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 18:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zvonková (Glöckelberg) - hřbitov.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK - A.Savin 16:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Paul Church in Passau - interior.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 10:15, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regiotrans train in Dumbrăveni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice scene. --Ikar.us 07:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veste Niederhaus by Pudelek 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 08:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veste Niederhaus by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 08:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitalkirche in Passau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus in Hauzenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 08:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: Korekcja perspektywy

Faktycznie, kolejny wpis tylko przedłużyłby głosowanie. W każdym razie dziękuję za Twoją uwagę. Uczę się dopiero poprawiać zdjęcia i trochę się dzięki niej nauczyłem. Pozdrawiam -- Jakubhal 11:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passau - three rivers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 17:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krummau - Apotheke, altes Schild.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krummau - Apotheke, altes Schild.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! River Beatrice ship, Passau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a crop until the bollard could help ?--Jebulon 10:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Ok, I cropped image --Pudelek 20:30, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Good enough now--Someone35 13:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Český Krumlov (Krummau) - red house.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The house looks like a 2 dimensional decor rather than a real building (and I guess it IS a real building) and has a strong perspective distortion.--Someone35 13:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC) It seems a decor piece indeed! The perspective is no problem, as the vertical lines are really vertical. Good image of a historical facade. -- MJJR 21:38, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Český Krumlov (Krummau) - zámecká věž.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--Jebulon 13:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaiblingsturm Passau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Qiqritiq 13:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passau - three rivers 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residenzplatz, Passau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostel sv. Jošta v Českém Krumlově.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:50, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Český Krumlov (Krummau) - 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Marie-Claire 21:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelhřimov (Pilgrams) - Jihlavská brána.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Troki (Trakai) - old wooden house.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 06:13, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Narodowy Ujście Warty - tablica w wodzie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fajne, dla mnie to jest QI. (QI for me) --Jakubhal 06:31, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Český Krumlov (Krummau) - panorama - old city.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. --Mattbuck 11:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Český Krumlov (Krummau) - panorama.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 11:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Český Krumlov (Krummau) - I. nádvoří zámku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 11:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelhřimov (Pilgrams) - Masarykovo náměstí s kašnou.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. And I like stormy skies.--Jebulon 08:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilgrams - alte Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Jebulon 14:43, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Troki (Trakai) - old wooden house 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Küstrin (Altstadt) - Berliner Tor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Jebulon 15:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelhřimov (Pilgrams) - Rynárecká brána.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sfu 06:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
EML Kalev ship (minesweeper).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Perhaps add in the scope that it's a minesweeper? --Ikar.us (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • If you want... --Pudelek (talk) 21:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Yes I want - especially since there were also minelayers with the same name!?!  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 21:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Küstrin (Altstadt) - Berliner Tor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Jebulon 15:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumšiškės (Rumszyszki) - Open air ethnographic museum 6 - mill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments To dark IMO, otherwise good and QI.--ArildV 09:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC) I uploaded new version --Pudelek 14:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC) Ok now IMO.--ArildV 15:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trakai (Troki) - Church of Visitation of Holy Virgin Mary - interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:02, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ER9M multiple unit in Vilnius.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 22:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Wilno

Jak Ci się podobało? Ja za fotę katedry dostałem po łbie. Zawsze coś płynie :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 21:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

W żadnym wypadku nie porównuję moich wypocin do Twojej sztuki :-) Podziwiam Twoją niezmordowaność. Albertus teolog (talk) 22:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

To prawda. Marzy mi się nowy aparat. Jakaś lustrzanka byłby fajna, ale wciąż są wazniejsze wydatki. Pzdr. Albertus teolog (talk) 07:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trakai Peninsula Castle and balloon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The dark parts were too dark IMO, I've tried something. If wrong or bad, please revert ! --Jebulon 23:33, 4 October 2011 (UTC) For me always is now OK :) --Pudelek 23:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC) Good quality. --Sfu 12:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trains in Vilnius (Wilno).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 18:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumšiškės (Rumszyszki) - Open air ethnographic museum 2 - shrine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit underexposed. (You can correct this easily.) --Johannes Robalotoff 14:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC) Now is better version --Pudelek 14:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC) Not perfect, but better now.--Jebulon 14:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Sugestia

Na Litwie mają takie samo prawo jak we Francji, dlatego wiele moich fotek z jednego i drugiego wyleciało :-) Na QI są narażone :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 11:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot air balloon - Trakai, LTU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 01:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumšiškės (Rumszyszki) - Open air ethnographic museum 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Mindaugas in Vilnius.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mindaugas in Vilnius.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Achim Raschka 13:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Pudelek, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Anne's Church in Vilnius (Wilno).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 19:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Casimir in Vilnius (Wilno) - crown.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, QI to me--Lmbuga 14:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vilnius (Wilno) - cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Harrison49 16:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rundāle Palace - the Marble Hall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 17:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauska Castle by Pudelek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:54, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rundāle Palace - porcelain room.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Definitely not my taste, but QI nevertheless.--Jebulon 16:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Pinned your photo

Hello Marcin, I pinned your photo of the Sedlec Ossuary, Kutná Hora, on Pinterest. Thanks for the use of it!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rundāle Palace - old sink.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 14:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boundary marker of Latvia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:07, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaunas Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope and only one that shows the general view of the castle --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:21, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neļķu klints (Carnation cliff), Salaca river.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden church in Lipnica Dolna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult light but good.--Jebulon 00:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salacgrīva - port 3 - lighthouse.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rundāle Palace - dropped ceiling.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Are you sure about the White Balance ? I tried to ajust it with the reflection on the chandelier and I got something different. --Vassil 17:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC)I uploaded my edit, let's wait and see... --Vassil 20:08, 2 November 2011 (UTC) Yes Vassil, far much better IMO. Good job for QI--Jebulon 18:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miasteczko Galicyjskie - Nowy Sącz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 21:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skansen in Sanok - oil drilling rig.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * CommentNot a very good composition IMO, dark background.--ArildV 00:26, 13 November 2011 (UTC)*  Support No technical problem --Archaeodontosaurus 06:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC) I don't see dark background 01:09, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miasteczko Galicyjskie - Nowy Sącz - szersza.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Jebulon 16:22, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miasteczko Galicyjskie - Sanok 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, QI for me -- Achim Raschka 10:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miasteczko Galicyjskie - Sanok 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Léna 17:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miasteczko Galicyjskie - Sanok 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Léna 17:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanok - old town hall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Sfu 08:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Masyw Śnieżnika.

Pozwoliliśmy sobie użyć Twoje zdjęcie: http://stk.ue.poznan.pl/rajd-grudniowy-2011 Dzięki! :) Marcin

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach in Pärnu - tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 15:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace in Łańcut.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 15:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pärnu - Punane torn (Red tower).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 17:12, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tallinn - Town Hall Square (Raekoja plats).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments W sumie w porządku. Ładne miejsce. Dlaczego jednak przeskalowane? --Sfu 08:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Co masz na myśli z tym przeskalowaniem? --Pudelek 13:04, 20 November 2011 (UTC) Wydaje mi się, że zdjęcie ma zmniejszoną rozdzielczość. --Sfu 19:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC) Faktycznie, zdjęcie musiałem to nieco zmniejszyć - ciężko złożyć panoramę z takiego ujęcia przy takiej bliskości budynków, trzeba było czasem coś naprostować, widoczne było CA po bokach. Nie miało sensu wrzucać rozdzielczości oryginalnej, bo zdjęcie nie byłoby już tak ładne przy zbliżeniu - a obecna rozdzielczość nie wydaje mi się zła --Pudelek 12:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC) Dzięki za odpowiedź. --Sfu 10:12, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old house in Tallinn (elamu Rüütli 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 06:30, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of Tallinn city hall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 15:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirita harbour (Tallinn Olympic Yachting Centre) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaindlo M416, ship.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 14:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PVL 105 Torm, ship.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps a bit dark in my monitor (I see all the pictures a bit dark), but good quality and, to me, good composition--Lmbuga 18:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikołów (Nikolei) - MDK.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linnahall (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:36, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EML Kalev (M414), ship.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 22:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oppeln - Mühlgraben 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame of the cars, especially the red, but nice light, nice view, nice mood and nice place.--Jebulon 00:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Nevsky Cathedral in Tallinn - interior.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI, in my opinion--Jebulon 15:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden houses in Pärnu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the colors--Lmbuga 04:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel "Mercure", Opole.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --ArildV 22:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vana Juri Kivi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 15:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

* * * Happy New 2012 Year! * * *

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harmaja island near Helsinki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 10:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suomenlinnan kirkko 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suomenlinna, submarine Vesikko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice view to Vesikko! --Ralf Roletschek 14:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
PVL 105 Torm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Only image within scope.--Jetstreamer (talk) 21:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:25, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flags of countries of the Baltic Sea in Helsinki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Maybe the black strip in foreground could be cropped a bit.--Jebulon 16:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keisarinnankivi (Helsinki) - part.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Gabriella in Helsinki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnish soldier in the front of Main Guard Post, Helsinki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view and good quality. --Haeferl 12:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartburg 353 W, Helsinki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DHL semi-trailer - unloaded from ferry.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't know, it's not really got anything wrong with it, but I just don't like the angle. Mattbuck 21:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Tallinn (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Is not the scope too broad and thus inaccurate? Looking at other pictures in the category it appears that the picture is capturing in full only the iconostasis than the whole interior of the cathedral.--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 20:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. พ.s. 22:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ice cream van, Helsinki (Helsingfors).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sfu 13:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keisarinnankivi (Helsinki).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 14:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinki - panorama from Uspenski Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The foreground shadow's a bit disturbing, but overall I approve. --Mattbuck 14:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Enso headquarters and Uspensky Cathedral, Helsinki (Helsingfors).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 15:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building from 1901 in Helsinki (Helsingfors).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 16:02, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinki Central Railway Station - statues.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Statues not are free, in Finland not are FOP. --Ralf Roletschek 14:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC) Info Artist Emil Wikström died September 26, 1942. So wait a little longer. Makele-90 17:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC) but this is a part of building, in public place [1], in my opinion FOP --Pudelek 18:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uspenski Cathedral, Helsinki (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments hey, thats my Cathedral Motiv ;) --Ralf Roletschek 16:12, 19 January 2012 (UTC) This is nice building, so and nice motiv :) --Pudelek 17:16, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keisarinnankivi (Helsinki) - 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit more to right with more Enso is better but this ist QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek 22:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutheran Cathedral in Helsinki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why no EXIF data? I see some noise in the sky. What is the ISO value? --NorbertNagel 19:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC) ISO is 80 --Pudelek 18:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Yann 08:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinki City Martathon 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 07:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutheran Cathedral in Helsinki - dome.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wartburg 353 W, Helsinki (front).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 14:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Helsinki_Central_Railway_Station_-_statues.JPG

File:Helsinki_Central_Railway_Station_-_statues.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apalsola ^{t • c} 19:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VAZ-2101 (ВАЗ-2101 Жигули) , Tallinn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turaida Castle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 17:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigulda New Castle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors, but the shade is disturbing. Yann 11:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --Sfu 11:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turaida Castle (Treyden Burg) - ruins.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 11:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riga - city gate by night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 17:21, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Market square, Helsinki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It all seems very slightly blurred to me - maybe needs sharpening? Mattbuck 17:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)for me its good enouth for QI. --Ralf Roletschek 20:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome square in Riga - old building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft but otherwise very encyclopedic - informative and valuable as a whole.--MrPanyGoff 18:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome square in Riga - Art Nouveau building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Car of Latvian Security Service of Parliament and State President.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brīvības piemineklis (by Pudelek) - part.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 20:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Brīvības piemineklis (by Pudelek).JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brīvības piemineklis (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Too dark bottom part of a photo --Aleks G 16:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC) (The file is updated) ;) --Aleks G 22:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shack from Gulag - Museum of the Occupation of Latvia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI. --Ralf Roletschek 12:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imperial Russian soldier with phone.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mayabe you should try it at FPC. --Tomer T 20:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latvian Ethnographic Open-Air Museum - bathouse (banya).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 11:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town Hall Square (Vilnius).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 04:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shack from Gulag - Museum of the Occupation of Latvia (2 photo).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit odd, but ok. --Mattbuck 11:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daugava (Düna) in Riga - bridges.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough. --Mattbuck 15:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latvian soldier in front of Riga Castle 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments underexposed IMO--Jebulon 14:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC) It's not too bad. Mattbuck 11:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC).  Support OK to me. --Iifar 17:18, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latvian Ethnographic Open-Air Museum - windmill.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jelgava Castle (Jelgavas pils).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 01:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kryžių kalnas (Góra Krzyży).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 12:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GAZ-12 ZIM.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Imo meets the criteria. --Iifar 17:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RAF-2907 (2203) for Moscow 1980.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 01:07, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaunas Castle in 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little perspective distorstion by good enough for QI. --Moonik 13:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kėdainiai (Kiejdany) - new synagogue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 03:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaunas Castle in 2011 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me.. -- Jkadavoor 05:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Michael the Archangel in Kaunas - dome.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice QI for me.--Jebulon 22:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Kėdainiai (Kiejdany) - market square.JPG

File:Kėdainiai (Kiejdany) - market square.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 23:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sedlo Ploskej a Čierny kameň.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 20:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Góry Wałbrzyskie

Hej. Udało mi się to skleić Huginem - w końcu się zdecydowałem go zainstalować. File:Wałbrzych panorama Gór Wałbrzyskich 2011 p.jpg, tak że przy panoramkach nie będę już 4 liter zawracać ;) Ale tif ważył ponad 750mb. Pozdrówka. Przykuta → [edit] 13:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ploská - hrob.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 18:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banhow Katowicy-Pjotrowicy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:40, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaunas Castle - panorama.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Óðinn 16:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)  Comment Looks ok, but there is a "fifth wheel" on the upper left corner. --Iifar 18:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Corrected! --Pudelek 12:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schimischow (Heuerstein O.S., Szymiszów) - Kirche.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Červená Skala - stanica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, nice foggy background.--ArildV 23:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ľubochnianska dolina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please add an English file description!. --NorbertNagel 06:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche in Niesnaschin (Scheinau, Nieznaszyn).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 08:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche in Przewos (Fährendorf).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 16:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle in Roschowitzdorf (Gräfenstein, Roszowice).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty little church. Too bad about the wires. --Saffron Blaze 19:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SA137-04, Komprachcice (Comprachtschütz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Droga wojewódzka nr 422 na Odrze.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ;-) "River" --Ralf Roletschek 13:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC) --Ralf Roletschek 13:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przewos - crucifix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old silesian chapel - Kalinow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolster Groß Rauden in 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but denoising maybe a bit too strong.--Jebulon 17:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferry - Oder (Silesia)- Grzegorzowice - Ciechowice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slawenburg Raddusch (Raduš) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere & OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 18:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slawenburg Raddusch (Raduš) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 17:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)