User talk:Powerek38/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1

Flickr images

Sorry for the slightly late note, but you may now begin reviewing Flickr images. — Giggy 05:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flickreviewing

Hello Powerek38. I've noticed that you did not upload the original resolution of Image:Olafur Eliasson's Waterfalls under the Brooklyn Bridge.jpg when Flickreviewing it. Please check your previous edits and make sure that the original high resolutions are uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr.com. Thank you, and keep up the good work! --Kimse (talk) 00:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Powerek. As a sysop of Polish Wikipedia, you should know how high resolution images are valuable to Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Therefore, why not upload the original resolution of images when they're freely available? Please see Quality and description and FAQ for reference. I will mention the instructions template that you gave me at the discussion page of Flickr images/reviewers as you mentioned it doesn't say anything about the image resolution. Thanks, Kimse (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Tonyburke.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tonyburke.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tonyburke.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 03:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Gerald Ford (portrait).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gerald Ford (portrait).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--feydey (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's always good to have others re-checking. Best, feydey (talk) 12:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Statue_IKBrunel_PaddingtonStn_DMS_05122005-003-1.jpg

File:Statue_IKBrunel_PaddingtonStn_DMS_05122005-003-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cirt (talk) 08:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Powerek38, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping out! Patrícia msg 23:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

[1] przejmiesz paleczke? Jak sie cos pojawi etc? Dzieki Masur (talk) 14:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ray & Minister of ND.jpg

File:Ray & Minister of ND.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--J Milburn (talk) 23:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions

Just to inform you. I believe the images are tagged with nld wrongfully. If you look at the template on them and compare it with the date should there not have been made a ordenary deletion request? --MGA73 (talk) 22:13, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can read more here Commons_talk:Licensing#Deprecated_licenses and here Commons:Undeletion_requests#Speedy.27ed_files_with_.7Bmilitary_insignia.7D. It is possible to make a DR with several files so it is not needed to have thousands of DR. I hope that a DR could make more people help checking licenses and maybe help finding free images. DR's are seen by more than a nld is. --MGA73 (talk) 23:03, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Powerek38. You have new messages at MGA73's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

About deletion of IT-Airforce-OF-8.png

From the deletion log I found that you have deleted this image. I would like to know why you did it... and why I you did not inform the creator (i.e. me). --F l a n k e r (talk) 08:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, F l a n k e r (talk) 18:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska zaprasza Cię na warsztaty fotograficzne, które odbędą się w Łodzi, 1-3 maja 2010. Twój wkład do Wikimedia Commons wskazuje, że możesz wiele skorzystać z udziału w warsztatach i podzielić się swoim doświadczeniem fotograficznym z innymi. Warsztaty są skierowane do:

  • osób już wgrywających mniejsze czy większe ilości zdjęć do Wikimedia

Commons - niezależnie od ich jakości

  • fototoamatorów - nie związanych dotąd z projektami Wikimedia
  • zawodowych fotografów - w charakterze doradców i wykładowców

Nie ma znaczenia jaki typ fotografii preferujesz - w Wikimedia Commons jest miejsce zarówno dla portrecistów, dokumentalistów, jak i fotografów pejzażu miejskiego i przyrody. Wikiwarsztaty będą miały charakter kameralny (max. 40-50 osób) i trwały przez weekend 1-3 maja 2010 <sobota-poniedziałek>, Zajęcia będą się odbywały w Łódzkim Domu Kultury oraz w plenerze. Organizatorzy zapewniają w ramach opłaty konferencyjnej (50 zł od osoby) - nocleg( PTSM na ul. Zamenhoffa), wyżywienie (obiady) i bezpłatny dostęp do Internetu w trakcie obrad.

E-mail: wikifoto@wikimedia.pl WWW: http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiwarsztaty_fotograficzne Tel: 0-22 219 56 94 Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska, ul. Tuwima 95, p. 15, Łódź.

Zobacz też: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/pl/6/66/Zaproszenie_wiki_foto_2010.pdf

Pozdrowienia,

Organizatorzy Warsztatów Wikifoto 2010

File:Upr CE.jpg

I see you speak Polish and English. Could you have a look at the description of File:Upr CE.jpg? The English doesn't make much sense; I'm guessing that "pattern" was meant to be "patent", but even that seems a bit unlikely and archaic. Should it just be "certificate"? (The Polish Certyfikatora seems awfully close to that.) Anyway, if you can improve the English description here & maybe the categories, I'd appreciate it. Category:Architecture is not really very useful. Thanks in advance. - Jmabel ! talk 07:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Cześć, Concerning this File:Zsoldos Márton.jpg, I don't know why did you mark the message "was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file". Do you need more e-mail from the author? Help me pls. Regards Andrew69. (talk) 08:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Files still awaiting OTRS confirmation

Hello, Powerek38. The file(s) listed below have been marked with {{OTRS received}}, but there has been no complete confirmation of its permission status in the last 30 days. From what I'm able to tell, you were the person who added this template. Would you mind taking a look at this again? If confirmation cannot be found, this file should probably be marked for deletion. This should be the only notification you will receive regarding this image, so long as the comment I added to the image description page is not altered. Thanks! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 00:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not an OTRS volunteer or did not add the "received" template to this file, it's possible I made a mistake identifying the correct user. I look for the most recent diff where the template was added, so if you reverted an edit where this template was removed, I can't tell the difference. If this is the case, please let my operator know at w:en:User talk:Hersfold. Sorry for the inconvenience!

The file(s) in question are:

This one was left on my talk page but it looks like you know it?


Hello, Powerek38. You have new messages at MGA73's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

De-adminship warning

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Powerek38/Archive 1. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Huib talk Abigor @ meta 08:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charing_X_Renamed.png

File:Charing_X_Renamed.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 01:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2242A (4).jpg

Hej. Jak już jest wypełniony szablon zabytek, to można ściągnąć kategorię ogólną, bo kat. gminna dodawana jest automatycznie wtedy z szablonu. Huh, co do fot Nelly - są fajne, ale jeszcze z wykazu trzeba opis zrobić. Wiem, wiem - sporo roboty, ale przy okazji da się coś fajnego do haseł wrzucić :) Przykuta → [edit] 18:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A jasne - to było uogólnienie, co by nie mącić w głowach uczestników nie znających w ogóle naszej kategoryzacji. Sam zresztą dla zabytków Wałbrzycha zrobiłem kategorię ;) Przykuta → [edit] 19:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DominicanGate.JPG

File:DominicanGate.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

CarrieSfuller (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:North head.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:North head.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:North head.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Head (talk) 00:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Managua_Landscape.jpg

File:Managua_Landscape.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 16:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stlucia.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Stlucia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 15:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Okopisko at Jagiellońska Street in Sanok, rewerty i wandalizmy 46.174.26.245 (Silar)

Cześć. Czy mógłbyś wyrazić swoje zdanie i być może zdecydować w sprawie tej kategorii Category:Okopisko at Jagiellońska Street in Sanok. Pokrótce sprawa wygląda tak, że jest to zwyczajowa, ugruntowana i bez żadnych problemów używana nazwa tego miejsca w Sanoku. Wcześniej był to teren cmentarza żydowskiego (Art. wiki pl). Zaś po wojnie cmentarz zlikwidowano i powstał taki skwer nazywany Okopisko (patrz określenie Okopisko w wiki pl - w stronach płd-wsch. Polski nie ma ono konotacji negatywnych). Dodać należy, że wśród mieszkańców Sanoka jest to ugruntowana nazwa na to miejsce i nie występuje inna, po prostu "jedzie się przez Okopisko", "sklep jest pod Okopiskiem" itd). Jak podałem, nazwa występuje w źródłach, publikacjach, wypowiedziach i nikt nie uważa nazwy za noszącą przejawy antysemityzmu itp (określenie pojawia się nawet na stronie Sztetl). Użytkownik 46.174.26.245 (znany też zapewne Tobie) zgłosił tę nazwę pod dyskusję i stworzył dodatkowo nową kategorię pod nazwą "Category:Square at Jagiellońska Street in Sanok", co było zupełnym nieporozumieniem, jako że "square" to plac (kwadratowy), a nie teren zieleni, mały park czy ogród, a tym jest właśnie obecnie Okopisko w Sanoku, co widać na zdjęciach. Poza tym drugą nieścisłością jego nazwy był domysł, jakoby było to jedno jedyne tego typu miejsce przy tej ulicy, przecież są też ewentualne inne ogrody tego typu przy tej ulicy i też mogą otrzymać kategorię.

Użytkownik który stworza w tym przypadku problemy to 46.174.26.245 i jest to ta sama osoba co Silar w wiki pl i commons, 46.174.24.10 oraz pojawia się pod innymi nazwami i IP. Jest już znany z tworzenia edycji kwalifikujących się na wandalizmy, wypisywania wymysłów, nieuzasadnionych teorii. Wielokrotnie otrzymywał ostrzeżenia, blokady. Wszystko można sprawdzić:

Proszę o interwencję. --Lowdown (talk) 10:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nie ma sprawy:-) Napisałem do kilku adminów w tej sprawie, więc nie czuj się zobowiązany. Udanych wakacji!;-) --Lowdown (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcie Joan Sims

Dzięki, że to sprawdziłeś. Mój błąd. Zmarnowałem czas mój i Twój. Dobrze, że to zdjęcie usunąłeś. Grzegorznadolski (talk) 23:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Powerek38/Archive 1. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 07:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:WilliamAdamson.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:WilliamAdamson.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:WilliamAdamson.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Party logo: File:Logo-twoj-ruch2013.png

Dear Administrator! Please, delete this file: File:Logo-twoj-ruch2013.png. Designer, who created this logo for party Twój Ruch, after I published file made by me self (with CorelDraw - actually version), started concerns about it. Now he declared, he and party Twój Ruch does not wish, this logo remains in public domain. Please, do it for me to avoid further problems, court trials included! Thank you for help in advance! Zboralski (talk) 10:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję za wiadomość. Napisałem prośbę do kilku adminów, bo prosiłem o to od tygodonia angielskojęzycznych i nic się nie działo. I trochę byłem w panice. Ale w końcu ktoś zadziałał. Zboralski (talk) 22:43, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

Nie wiem o co dokładnie powienienem poprosić w zgodzie właścicieli praw do grafiki ze strony www, którą chciałbym załadować na commons. Nie wiem też co ja potem powiniem dokładnie zrobić w razie ich zgody by było wszystko tip top. Przepraszam że zawracam tym głowę, ale to dla mnie ważne a nie mam o tym zielonego pojęcia. Pozdrawiam Grzegorznadolski (talk) 08:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nieaktualne Grzegorznadolski (talk) 12:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays!
G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:47, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re; Locator maps vs. location maps

Witaj. Przeczenie "moich" mapek jest dokładnie takie samo (służą do określania położenia określonych obiektów na terenie miasta), zatem jedyną niedokładnością może być nazwa - ale to chyba szczegół, prawda? Pozdrawiam, pjahr @ 18:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ale swoją drogą nie rozumiem, o co Ci chodzi. Tworzę mapki "X location map.svg", które potem dodaję na PL Wiki do szablonów, które można wykorzystać do lokalizacji dowolnych obiektów. Czyli problemem jest umieszczenie w kategorii Category:Location maps of cities of Masovian Voivodeship zamiast Category:Locator maps of cities of Masovian Voivodeship, tak? O to chodzi? Pozdrawiam, pjahr @ 19:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Usunięte plakaty

Cześć, wygląda na to, że pospieszyłem się z EK-em plików File:Projekt plakatu do filmu "Seksmisja" Juliusza Machulskiego. Akryl, tektura. Oryginał. Kolekcja prywatna - Warszawa..jpg i File:Jan Pawel II - Wieslaw Walkuski.jpg. Wikipedysta Bank01 na pl:Dyskusja wikipedysty:Bank01 podał, że ma prawa do tych prac. IMHO należy je odtworzyć, tylko autora w opisie trzeba skorygować (autor plakatu: Wiesław Wałkuski, autor zdjęcia plakatu: Bank01). Pozdrawiam, Michał Sobkowski (talk) 20:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki za "Seksmisję", mógłbyś też przywrócić ten drugi (File:Jan Pawel II - Wieslaw Walkuski.jpg)? Pozdrawiam, Michał Sobkowski (talk) 06:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba

Witam, czy jako admin mógłbyś zmienić nazwę pliku [[2]] z Karol-Durski-Trzaska na Stanisław Puchalski, bo to ten ostatni jest na zdjęciu. Jeśli się nie mylę, to teraz można na commons zmieniać nazwy plików, bez kasowania i łądowania od nowa? Cała sprawa opisana jest tu: [3] (i posty poprzednie). Po zmianie nazwy, możesz ozważyć czy nie skasować tego zdjęcia [4] - to jest to samo ujęcie, tyle że słabsze jakościowo. Nie wiem jakie są na commons zwyczaje do kasacji, jeśli kasacja wymaga długich dyskusji, to można sobie odpuścić, w końcu na dwóch kopiach nikt nie cierpi, poza serwerem:) Pozdrawiam --Piotr967 (talk) 15:55, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję. --Piotr967 (talk) 21:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passiflora coccinea

Witaj, zauważyłem, że na tym pliku nie znajduje się Passiflora coccinea. Passiflora coccinea ma czerwone kwiaty. Pozdrawiam. Tournasol7 (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Powerek38, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2015 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charing X Renamed.png

File:Charing X Renamed.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 11:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Tonyburke.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tonyburke.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tonyburke.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

—LX (talk, contribs) 13:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chełm location map

dzięki za info, by tej kwestii zbytnio nie komplikować, tylko upraszczać, po krótkiej wymianie zdań z @Jdx opracowałem przez weekend 3 proste schematy lokalizacyjne SVG ([5], [6], [7] - nie wiem jak obsługiwać wiki, ani czy są odpowiedniej jakości, więc jeśli coś jest nie tak, to ew. usuń je jeśli możesz, albo je poprawię), bo wydaje mi się, że takie proste schematy byłyby w zupełności wystarczające jako location maps na stronach linkujących, a jeśli ktoś potrzebowałby location map z mapą, to o niebo lepsza od mapy OSM wydaje mi się zwykła mapa topograficzna, jak np. tutaj [8], bo ona przynajmniej nie zniekształca aż tak obrazu miasta jak inne mapy robione dla kierowców tirów, które wyolbrzymiają wybrane drogi tranzytowe, ignorują najważniejsze elementy miasta, a strukturę miasta czynią zupełnie nieczytelną - w przypadku Chełma dominującym, najważniejszym elementem wokół którego rozwinęło się całe miasto była i nadal jest Górka Katedralna, która stała się symbolem i główne osie kompozycji, które nadały kształt strukturze miasta, natomiast mapy opracowywane od lat 80-tych przez komunikantów zupełnie tą czytelność miasta rozmywają (wcześniej tak nie było, bo wcześniejsze mapy zawsze takie elementy uwzględniały) - zerknij w wolnej chwili, jak będziesz mógł czy któraś z tych grafik wystarczyłaby do wymiany location map OSM na stronach linkujących, czy też powinienem coś poprawić, pozdr., --wkaczura (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • eh, no znam krańcowe współrzędne tych trzech map o tyle, o ile ręcznie sprawdziłem je w geoportalu i w google i one wynoszą N: 51.177972, 51°10'40.28"N; E: 23.576176, 23°34'34.32"E; S: 51.092950, 51°05'34.71"N; W: 23.398819, 23°23'56.06"E, ale niestety nie wiem jaką metodą należy wprowadzić je do opisu, bo w twojej mapie użyłeś ramki OSM, natomiast ja wykorzystałem wektoryzacje, które sam tworzyłem przez lata z różnych map kartograficznych, a te location map, które służyły mi za przykłady, np. z Warszawy i inne, niestety nie mają żadnych współrzędnych, więc nie bardzo wiem jakim narzędziem lub kodem należy dopisać je prawidłowo, a chyba nie chodzi tylko o samo podanie zaokrąglonych współrzędnych jak w tym opisie, który próbowałem zmodyfikować [9] ? gdybyś mógł mi podesłać jakiś przykład, jak te współrzędne wprowadzić w przypadku prac własnych, to już je skoryguję i pousuwam "lokalizację fotografia", --wkaczura (talk) 03:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • dzięki za przykład, bo wszędzie szukałem, ale tych modułów lokalizacyjnych jakoś nie znalazłem - to współrzędne tych 4 propozycji map lokalizacyjnych są takie jak podałem już wyżej, ale nie wiem czy to chodzi o to, aby do tego modułu [Chełma] wprowadzić takie zmiany:
mapa = "Chełm location map topo.png",
top = 51.177972,
bottom = 51.092950,
left = 23.398819,
right = 23.576176,
a nie bardzo chcę robić eksperymenty metodą prób i błędów, by czegoś nie popsuć na większą skalę, bo się na tym nie znam, pozdr. --wkaczura (talk) 00:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC) @Powerek38 na wakacjach jesteś, czy po prostu zbyt zajęty ? :D --wkaczura (talk) 08:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
wielkie dzięki, sprawdziłem wszystkie linkujące, wyglądają perfekcyjnie, nie widzę błędów, super ! --wkaczura (talk) 11:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Powerek38, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ryłko.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ryłko.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ryłko.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Upload/pl

Cześć. Nie wiem komu zgłosić usterkę w starym formularzu przesyłania plików? Po otworzeniu polskojęzycznego uploadu, w liście „Skąd pochodzi ta praca? (Kliknij we właściwy link)” nie działa link: „Jest pracą pochodną w stosunku do pliku z Wikimedia Commons” Jacek555 (talk) 07:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Jasne. Jacek555 (talk) 10:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dorset beaminster ch sunset 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship

Hi Powerek38,
I'm very sorry to let you know that following your prolonged period of inactivity as an administrator and under criterion #3 of our admin inactivity policy, I requested the removal of your admin privileges on this project, and the request has now been fulfilled by a Wikimedia steward through Meta. As you are an experienced editor and per our custom, I have added you to the "autopatrolled" user group instead. I would like to use this opportunity to thank you for your service to our community, and I hope that you will continue editing Commons as a regular contributor, too. Of course, please do feel free to re-apply for adminship when you get more active.

P.S. Wielka szkoda, że tracimy kolejnego polskojęzycznego administratora :-( Widzę, że od sierpnia 2016 wykonałeś na Commons tylko 7 edycji, ale mam nadzieję, że jeszcze do nas wrócisz. Do zobaczenia wkrótce! odder (talk) 01:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jeremy Hunt Farnham 2010.JPG

File:Jeremy Hunt Farnham 2010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 16:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Harold Alexander 026065.jpg

File:Sir Harold Alexander 026065.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 16:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sydney Technical College.jpg

File:Sydney Technical College.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Defaultsort

Greetings! I'm curious about this edit. I see that the article still sorts correctly in its categories; is this achieved through the Wikidata infobox? If so, what functionality of Wikidata achieves the defaultsort? No need for a ping as I've added your talk page to my watchlist. Schwede66 08:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: Hello! Yes, this is achieved by Wikidata infobox, but I'm just a humble user of this template, I havent't designed it or coded it. Could you please ask your question again on the template's talk page, which is watched by its main author and other contributors? I'm sure the answer you'll get there will be far more competent. Thank you! Powerek38 (talk) 09:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I've had a look on the template's talk page (archive) and I can see how it works. All is good. Keep up your good work. Schwede66 18:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-protected file

Cześć. Chciałbym rozjaśnić zdjęcie File:Fringe-eared_Oryx_5.jpg, które dzisiaj stanowi ilustrację do CzW na pl:wiki, ale plik jest chroniony w ramach Commons:Auto-protected files/wikipedia/pl. Możesz mi w tym pomóc? Jacek555 (talk) 04:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia

Mam do Ciebie pytanie: czy można w WCommons publikować zdjęcia portretowe, które widnieją na świadectwach dojrzałości maturzystów polskich szkół sprzed 1939 roku? Dla uściślenia dodam, że mam na myśli zdjęcia portretowe, które widnieją na odpisach świadectw świadectw dojrzałości, które są udostępniane w polskich archiwach państwowych. Czy to byłoby dozwolone? Jeśli tak to jaką licencją należałoby to opatrzyć? Lowdown (talk) 05:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:BMU1 Command Crest.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BMU1 Command Crest.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:BMU1 Command Crest.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 11:13, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Didur

Hej! Zastanawia mnie to przeniesienie kategorii pod nazwę "Adamo Didur". Jaka jest tego podstawa? O ile znam jego biografię, to był obywatel polski, więc imię, które otrzymał po urodzeniu i chrzcie na polskiej ziemi, powinno pozostać w wersji polskiej. Pewien okres życia zagranicą nie powinien tego zmienić, gdyż formalnie u kresu życia w Polsce był określany nadal jako "Adam". Nie dostrzegam w WCommons analogicznych przypadków zmiany tożsamości polskich obywateli na obcojęzyczne wersje (za wyjątkiem osób, które np. wyemigrowały, zmieniły obywatelstwo i zerwały kontakt z ojczyzną). Lowdown (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, dzięki za odpowiedź i Twoje zdanie. Myślę, że to było nieuzasadnione przeniesienie. Pozdrawiam!! Lowdown (talk) 08:17, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fraser1956.jpg

File:Fraser1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 12:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kasimir (given name)

Proszę mi wytłumaczyć dlaczego wg kategoryzacji infoboksowych z "Kazimierzy" powstają "Kasimiry" ? Czy w dalszej kolejności będze tak z "Janami-Johnami vel Johannami", "Henrykami-Heinrichami", "Jerzymi-Georgami", "Bogumiłami-Gottliebami" itd ? Jeżeli dobrze to zrozumiałem to jest to projekt multilingualny a nie tylko angielski czy też niemiecki. Dzięki z góry za ew. odpowiedź ? 95.112.163.157 16:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. dzięki. To dla mnie ciemna magia. Myślałem że istnieje jakiś bot który poprawi to z automatu. Spróbuję coś tam zmienić. 95.112.163.157 16:40, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zmiana nazw tradycyjnych polskich pułków ułańskich z okresu II RP

Witaj kategoryzuję od miesięcy kategorie dotyczące II RP, biografie itd. User z UKR Микола Василечко bez jakiejkolwiek dyskusji lub próby podjęcia dyskusji z innymi użytkownikami zlikwidował w projekcie multilingualnym commons tradycyjne nazwy polskie i wprowadził hybrydy angielsko-austrowęgierskie (uhlan z niemieckiego to po angielsku lancer} Category:1st Krechowce Uhlan Regiment, Category:2nd Grochow Uhlan Regiment, Category:3rd Silesian Uhlan Regiment, Category:5th Zaslaw Uhlan Regiment, Category:7th Lublin Uhlan Regiment, Category:8th Uhlan Regiment of Duke Jozef Poniatowski, Category:9th Lesser Poland Uhlan Regiment, Category:10th Lithuanian Uhlan Regiment, Category:11th Legions Uhlan Regiment, Category:12th Podolian Uhlan Regiment, Category:14th Jazlowiec Uhlan Regiment, Category:19th Volhynian Uhlan Regiment, Category:23rd Grodno Uhlan Regiment, Category:24th Uhlan Regiment, Category:25th Greater Poland Uhlan Regiment, Category:26th Greater Poland Uhlan Regiment po prostu zadecydował że tak będzie i już. Pułki te były pułkami polskimi i nie należały do żadnych formacji międzynarodowych czy wielokulturowych bądź wieloetnicznych. Jako kontrprzykład uszanowania tradycji narodowych, kultury i dowodu na projekt multilingualny podaję kategorię Category:Cavalry regiments of the Army of the German Empire gdzie nazewnictwo tradycyjnych pułków jest po niemiecku ... i logicznie nikomu nie przeszkadza. Zgłosiłem sprawę do administracji projektu i gdyby doszło do dyskusji na ten temat to proszę o wzięcie udziału w takowej. Dzięki z góry i pozdrawiam. 77.6.172.89 05:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria Sobocińska.jpg

File:Maria Sobocińska.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fryta73 (talk) 12:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiki0086.jpg

File:Wiki0086.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sardaka (talk) 08:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 5ee8c9cbe8cf74c9542934ebd896a234

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Template:Architects from Poland by century

Czy mógłbyś wstawić poniższy tekst (oczywiście bez cudzysłowia) do powyższego a tym samym utworzyć ten szablon ? Dzięki z góry. 77.10.120.212 23:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zrobione :) Pozdrawiam! Powerek38 (talk) 14:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dzięki. 77.1.33.237 22:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zdzisław Karpiński

Przy kilkukrotnych próbach wtawienia kategorii "Ofiary zbrodni katyńskiej wg nazwiska" włącza się Filtr nadużyć / abuse coś tam. Osoba figuruje na Ukraińskiej Liście Katyńskiej, czy mógłbyś sprawdzić co z tą blokadą ? Dzięki z góry. 77.8.168.162 04:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ja już od wielu lat nie jestem adminem na Commons, więc nie mam uprawnień do zbyt dokładnego oglądania ustawień filtrów nadużyć. Oczywiście pierwsze, co przychodzi do głowy, to kwestia edytowania bez zalogowania - w wielu przypadkach filtry mają mocniejsze ustawienia na IP niż na zalogowanych, poza tym admini mają możliwość nadawania kontom uprawnienia, które ograniczają wpływ filtrów na edycje tych osób. Powerek38 (talk) 07:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karol Walter

Jak wyżej. Abuse wskakuje od razu gdy pojawia się "Ofiary zbrodni katyńskiej wg nazwiska" po angielsku. 77.8.168.162 04:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karol Józef Stromenger / wikidata

Dotyczy powyższego, występuje dwukrotnie jako "Q96748598" i "Q112326690". Nie wiem jak tego "Q112326690" skasować. Dzięki z góry za ewentualną pomoc. 95.112.152.92 04:33, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Połączyłem te dwa elementy WD, jak zwykle przy łączeniu zachowany został niższy numer, czyli ten zaczynający się od Q96... Powerek38 (talk) 07:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Powerek38/Archive_1&oldid=809532995"