User talk:Paracelsus.magazine
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
use of File:Nelumno nucifera open flower - botanic garden adelaide2.jpg in a magazine etc.
[edit]Per the licence conditions of the image you are free to use this in your magazine with a very few conditions. You have to attribute the author (myself) of the image and you must accept that, should you modify the image for publication, that the modified image is also a free image that others can use and publish it under the same terms as I have published the original. There are basically no other conditions for its use - publish away ! - Peripitus (talk) 23:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Publication
[edit]I've responded to your request at User talk:80.218.7.152. Basically, as long as you abide to all terms of the GFDL, feel free to whatever you wish with it. Thegreenj (talk) 17:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Use of my pictures
[edit]Hi,
If you want to use the pictures mentioned here, remember that they are licensed under CC-BY-SA, so (as far as I get it) you need to provide a link/URL to the license. I think something like
"Pulsatilla pratensis subsp. bohemica, photo taken at the Ecological-Botanical Gardens in Bayreuth, Germany. Photo taken by El Grafo/Wikimedia Commons, licensed under CC-BY-SA (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)"
would be OK. You might want to put that URL in a footnote. Since the files are also licensed under GNU Free Documentation License, you could of course use this license instead, but that would mean you'd have to reprint the full license text. --El Grafo (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)