User talk:Onelocke
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator (find an active one) on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
|
ALE! ¿…? 15:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Sturla.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sturla.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --jynus (talk) 02:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Orgullomoore 07:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --
Etiquetando imagen Image:BirmiGardner.jpg
[edit]
Gracias por subir Image:BirmiGardner.jpg. Me he dado cuenta de que la página de la imagen actualmente no especifica quien creó el contenido, así que el estatus de derecho de autor no está claro. Si no has creado tu mismo esta imagen entonces es necesario que argumentes porqué la imagen se puede usar en Wikimedia Commons (ver el enlace de etiquetas de derecho de autor abajo). Si no has creado tú mismo la imagen entonces debes también especificar donde la encontraste, por ejemplo, en la mayoría de los casos un enlace a la web donde la tomaste y los términos de uso del contenido de esa web.
Si la imagen no tiene una etiqueta de derecho de autor debes también añadírselo. Si creaste la imagen entonces puedes usar {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} para licenciarla con Creative Commons o {{PD-self}} para ponerla en dominio público. Puedes mirar Marcas de derechos de autor para la lista completa de etiquetas que se pueden usar.
Ten en cuenta que cualquier imagen sin fuente o sin etiqueta será borrada una semana después de que haya sido subida, como se describe en criterios para borrado rápido. Si has subido otras imágenes, por favor comprueba que has especificado también a éstas su origen y la etiqueta de derecho de autor. Puedes encontrar todas los archivos que has subido usando la herramienta Gallery. Gracias. Barcex 05:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Bauru001.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Bauru001.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Loco085 06:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Sentinel.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sentinel.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE! ¿…? 15:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Image:RPB.JPG is uncategorized since 22 June 2009.
- Image:Mirlangamapa.jpg is uncategorized since 28 July 2009.
- Image:Birminghamgardner10.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Clausuramidland02.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Midlandtapiales.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Trendelevante2.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Birminghamgardner.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Clausuramidland04.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Midlandsansebastian.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Comienzaelmidland04.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Comienzamidland02.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Werkspoormidland.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Estacionhenderson01.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Birminghamgardner05.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Midlandhoy01.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Birminghamgardner06.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Birminghamgardner02.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Alsinasentinel.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Birminghamgardner09.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Clausuramidland01.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Birminghamgardner11.JPG is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
- Image:Sansebastianhoy.jpg is uncategorized since 5 August 2009.
- Image:Herrerahoy.jpg is uncategorized since 5 August 2009.
- Image:Hortenciahoy.jpg is uncategorized since 5 August 2009.
- Image:Icasanova.jpg is uncategorized since 5 August 2009.
- Image:Libertadhoy.jpg is uncategorized since 5 August 2009.
- Image:Estaciones varias 006.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2009.
- Image:Coronelsuarez22.svg was uncategorized on 12 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:ClaseEB11CentralNorte.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:ClaseEB11CentralNorte.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ClaseEB11CentralNorte.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Eusebius (talk) 18:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Midlandhoy02.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Midlandhoy02.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Midlandhoy02.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Eusebius (talk) 18:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mendevillehoy.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mendevillehoy.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mendevillehoy.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Wutsje (talk) 01:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Icasanova.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
ALE! ¿…? 12:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Villegashoy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
ALE! ¿…? 12:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Budgeactual.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Budgeactual.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Budgeactual.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
ALE! ¿…? 12:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Fioritohoy.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Fioritohoy.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fioritohoy.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
ALE! ¿…? 12:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Villadiamante.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Villadiamante.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Villadiamante.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
ALE! ¿…? 12:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
File:2-6-2T_KerrStuart.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ALE! ¿…? 12:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mirlangamapa.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mirlangamapa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
ALE! ¿…? 12:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:RPB.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:RPB.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
ALE! ¿…? 12:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Midlandmapa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ALE! ¿…? 12:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Do not insult me, read the rules
[edit]Please do not insult me and first read the rules and then respect them. I have put the welcome template on top so you can read the relevenat stuff.
regards --ALE! ¿…? 15:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Clausuramidland03.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Clausuramidland03.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
ALE! ¿…? 11:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Midlandhoy01.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Midlandhoy01.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Midlandhoy01.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
ALE! ¿…? 12:48, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Lasaladahoy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Andarin2 (talk) 22:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Libertadayer.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Libertadayer.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Libertadayer.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Deletion notification
[edit]I delete all your images stolen from other websites. You toke them from various sources and uploaded the image here with {{Pd-self}} saying:
- , the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain.
- (Yo, el autor de esta obra, la cedo aquí al dominio público. )
I, the copyright holder??? No, you are neither the author, not copyright holder, nor do you have any rights to claim this photographs into the public domain. Thats a lot of images you uploaded here this way, and you have a lot of notifiations and warnings above, therefore I block you from editing Commons to prevent future copyright violations from you. --Martin H. (talk) 11:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Additional the images
- Missing sources. Only a small part of the maps is your own work, the rest is someone else work. Provide sources for the base maps. --Martin H. (talk) 12:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently uploading media that is in violation of Commons' licensing policy, despite our warnings not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See block log.
(toolbox: contributions • page moves)
|
Martin H. (talk) 11:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Carhueayerga.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Carhueayerga.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Carhueayerga.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
shizhao (talk) 03:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Unblock request
[edit]I was talking offline with Onelocke. It appears that he contributes pictures along with other people to the Web site Plataforma 14 about trains. Since he is a major contributor there he thought that he could upload some of these pictures to Wikimedia Commons without permission of his fellow contributors. There was no bad faith in his actions, the problem was that he did not know the rules. If he is unlocked, I will help him to write e-mails to the OTRS team with the proper permission of the Plataforma 14 team. Best regards, Alpertron (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is not an answer to the unblock request, but the only way Onelocke could ignore the rules is by deliberatly not taking into accounts the various messages issued to him since 2006 (as far as I can see from his talk page). Has this block made him read the policies and guidelines more efficiently than the warnings? --Eusebius (talk) 21:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Most of the files were not erased by copyright violations but because of formal reasons, like missing source. Notice for example that even a picture of himself was erased. Best regards, Alpertron (talk) 21:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sourcing is a key element of copyright policy and apparently the first one to have been pointed out to Onelocke in 2006. --Eusebius (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- I mean that these railroad pictures were not taken from random websites, but from one that he is an active contributor. There is a lot of useful images for Wikipedia in Spanish about trains in Argentina that can be uploaded by him. He has access to many of the original pictures as taken from the photo cameras. I also received a mail from the Plataforma 14 site administrator, Gonzalo Yebra, author of some of the pictures who Onelocke uploaded and he has no problem to license not only the pictures from his site, but even the original pictures he took with the Creative Commons license. That's why I wanted to offer help to Onelocke and to help write the e-mails to OTRS as needed. Best regards, Alpertron (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK. I have said what I had to say, I guess. I prefer when the blocker is the unblocker, but since Martin hasn't shown up I will lift the block myself. It is useless to say that we expect Onelocke to be extra careful. --Eusebius (talk) 21:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will also be watching Onelocke's actions. Best regards, Alpertron (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK. I have said what I had to say, I guess. I prefer when the blocker is the unblocker, but since Martin hasn't shown up I will lift the block myself. It is useless to say that we expect Onelocke to be extra careful. --Eusebius (talk) 21:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- I mean that these railroad pictures were not taken from random websites, but from one that he is an active contributor. There is a lot of useful images for Wikipedia in Spanish about trains in Argentina that can be uploaded by him. He has access to many of the original pictures as taken from the photo cameras. I also received a mail from the Plataforma 14 site administrator, Gonzalo Yebra, author of some of the pictures who Onelocke uploaded and he has no problem to license not only the pictures from his site, but even the original pictures he took with the Creative Commons license. That's why I wanted to offer help to Onelocke and to help write the e-mails to OTRS as needed. Best regards, Alpertron (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sourcing is a key element of copyright policy and apparently the first one to have been pointed out to Onelocke in 2006. --Eusebius (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Most of the files were not erased by copyright violations but because of formal reasons, like missing source. Notice for example that even a picture of himself was erased. Best regards, Alpertron (talk) 21:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Pub Peron C14.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ALE! ¿…? 08:06, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Midlandsansebastian.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fma12 (talk) 13:19, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Clausuramidland01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fma12 (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Clausuramidland02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fma12 (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Mj-mid-levante.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fma12 (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Trendelevante2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fma12 (talk) 13:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Escudo del Club Atlético Rosario Central.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
1989 (talk) 17:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Escudo de Colchester United.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Glorious 93 (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bandera del Partido de Coronel Suárez.svg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bandera del Partido de Coronel Suárez.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bandera del Partido de Coronel Suárez.svg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Fma12 (talk) 01:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hurlingham.svg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hurlingham.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hurlingham.svg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Fma12 (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)