User talk:Nard the Bard/archive3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
User talk:Nard the Bard/archive1
User talk:Nard the Bard/archive2
User talk:Nard the Bard/archive3
User talk:Nard the Bard/archive4
User talk:Nard the Bard/archive5

DUDE COME ON!!!

[edit]

The halo3: recon logo, having it on wikipedia isn't violating any copyright notices as I have even asked Bungie if I could put it on wikipedia and I got a yes ¬¬ now ok I may have listed it wrong (new to wikipedia editing) so please remove the speedy deletion. ¬¬

Image:Joseph wolf titel.jpg

[edit]

Hi Nard the Bard, I wonder why you tagged this image as it carried a {{PD-ineligible}} template. This image is obviously a derived work on base of a painting by Joseph Wolf 1820-1899 which is in the PD due to its age. The derivation itself does not hit the threshold of originality such that the use of {{PD-ineligible}} is justified. I am not the uploader of that image — I just got aware of that edit and I am inclined to revert it. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Filipino_dwarfs_floro.jpg

[edit]

Hi Nard. With all due respect, I got this image from a foreign Forum which uploaded the original image. Now, so that I would not violate copyright laws, I did take a photo by myself of the image, developed it into physical 4R picture, using photo paper. Then I scanned it to the PC. I leave the legal discretion to you, on the matter, if this should be deleted or not. Cheers.--Judgefloro (talk) 08:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Czeslawa-Kwoka2.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Czeslawa-Kwoka2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

NYScholar (talk) 14:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:68.165.208.42

[edit]

This user has been blocked on English Wikipedia for this very behaviour. The user claims that Image:OSS seal.jpg and Image:OSS logo.jpg are owned by "The OSS Society". I called the United States Patent and Trademark Office and confirmed with them that those images are trademark of the United States Government.

I also took the liberty of calling "The OSS Society" and spoke with a Mr. Pinck, who is in charge of trademarks for that orginization, and he said that they do not own the images, they use them with permission.

Finally, the IP being used is registered to "TD International" in Washington, DC. I also contacted them and informed them of the vandalism going on via their IP address. The person I spoke to was none too happy to hear about it.

Oh, and there is also a checkuser for a registered user and this IP for the vandalism of these images, along with page protection. I suggest the same happen here. Take Care...NeutralHomer T:C 21:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome. Take Care...NeutralHomer T:C 21:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eugène Gigout 1910.jpg

[edit]

"you cannot end-run around it with another tag." -- well sorry but yes, I can. This image does not have an author, it is a recent work, so it must be properly documented; and as any other image, if it is undocumented, it must have a nsd tag. A deletion request where people vote not to answer mandatory questions is completely irrelevant. Rama (talk) 20:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Guitaro99 on English Wikipedia

[edit]

Hi Nard. For Guitaro99, please see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Guitaro99. -- Suntag ☼ 19:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nike Shoes2.jpg

[edit]

Hola, Nard, aprovecho que hablas español para hacerte una consulta. He visto que has dado tu opinión sobre la consulta de borrado de la Image:Nike Shoes2.jpg que subí a Commons, pero no entiendo las razones que se aducen para eliminarla. Me lo podrías aclarar? Un saludo, --Goldorak (talk) 12:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias por tu aclaración, la mayoría de las condiciones de Commons vienen en inglés y me resulta difícil comprender algunos borrados. Te seguiré consultando, thank you. --Goldorak (talk) 12:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:VTRPcpr.jpg

[edit]

Dear Nard

I request to decide on this image.

Thank you Auvir (talk) 22:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

I'll try to be a bit quicker next time :-) Giggy (talk) 00:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Palin

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you put a big red "X" on the Palin pic, here. However, that image is not relying on Flickr permission. It is relying on OTRS permission. Can you please double-check?Ferrylodge (talk) 02:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikipe-tan-ritzman.png DR

[edit]

Apology accepted. Sorry for my comment on the DR, I was a bit miffed... :) Iceflow (talk) 03:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

[edit]

Hi! Can you delete immediately all these pictures? Thanks. --Nyo (talk) 17:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image Tagging Image:Lhasatrainstation_shu.jpg

[edit]

I had checked the flickr image page before transfering the image. Since we noted the lincense was no longer compatible with commons, currently I have no objection to the deletion request. It will be great if someone would upload similar images for subsituation. Baycrest(Talk) 19:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Museo_Botero_Bogotá_by_Turista_Perene.png

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Museo_Botero_Bogotá_by_Turista_Perene.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

24.128.49.25 12:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:GAZ 21 Hood Ornament.jpg

[edit]

Hello you are delited this image http://www.flickr.com/photos/wgrabar/2456612220/sizes/o/in/photostream/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/wgrabar/2456612086/sizes/o/ but I see down a link to creativecommons. Can I upload this file? Thanks!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaro.p (talk • contribs)

Celine Dion images

[edit]

First, you need to familiarize yourself with something called Fair Use Policy and The Internet before you start talking out the side of your neck. Images did not and does violate any copyright. They are being re-uploaded. Dancefloor royalty (talk) 07:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slapping bullshit on my page will not make you appear smarter. I've seen piles of shit that have more intelligence and common sense then you have Dancefloor royalty (talk) 07:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hate repeating myself so re-read the above statement. Dancefloor royalty (talk) 06:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sonia_Silvestre_(2).JPG

[edit]

Outside project scope, potential copyvio -Nard the Bard 23:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi.

This is not a copyvio because I take the original foto miself with a tradicional camera in 2002.

The outscope image is because I take a digital photo to the foto with my digital camera , and this camera is not so good. This was the second intent to get a better quality picture.I tried to improve the background with a paint edition program.

Thanks for your time--Juan 15:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

P.D. You can answer me in Spanish im my talk page--Juan 15:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Hola Nard, un placer.

Obviamente, si algo tengo en cuenta es que esas fotos sean usadas en un proyecto wiki.

Simplemente fue tratar de subir un archivo para mejorar uno que esta siendo usado en una pagina wikipedia.es.

Especificamente, este era para ser usado en sustitucion del que esta en la pagina Sonia Silvestre de wikipedia , que es un articulo en que colaboré.

Mi intencion principal era mejorar la imagen de la que estaba ahi Sonia_Silvestre2.jpg‎ (la misma sin el fondo). Lamentablemente,uno no siempre logra sus propositos.

No se si es un desproposito someter a tu consideracion las dos images y solo mantener la que sea de mejor calidad en la pagina.

Mientras, tratare de encontrar una imagen de mejor calidad.-- Un placer conocerle y saludarle--Juan 18:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Argentina stamps

[edit]

I noted your comments on Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Estampillas-Argentina-Encotel.jpg but think this needs further discussion. Because most stamp designers can be identified from some of the specialised stamp catalogues, I doubt the {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} template is proper to use for Argentina stamps at all, irrespective of whether 50 or 70 years is the most appropriate time frame. If stamps were truly anonymously designed then 50-years would be a proper time period but someone did design them and they can usually be identified, even if it takes some extra effort. This particular image has stamps that are less than even 50 years old, though I need to verify how new they are but one is from 1963 (row 2, stamp 4, left of tweesers). This Argentina stamp is obviously not PD by any stretch of the imagination. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 01:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks

[edit]
Dear Nard the Bard,
Thanks for your support of my Request for Adminship. I’m honored by your trust.


Cheers, SterkeBak


Image:NardGeek.png

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:NardGeek.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

abf /talk to me/ 18:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests

[edit]

I noticed you made this comment on Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. I'd just like to clarify that the PD-Art policy is not an official resolution by the Wikimedia Foundation, but rather a local community decision that was based on the general opinions of at least two WMF employees, and that it was not (in my personal opinion) been thoroughly thought through. Please don't make the mistake of thinking we have the support of WMF on this, because as far as I can interpret it, they are not willing to make any sort of position on this matter (I can search for the relevant foundation-l threads if you wish more information about this). Patrícia msg 13:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

[edit]

Hi Nard, see here for the "translation" you've asked for. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bustillos

[edit]

Dear Sir You say that no way your own work, indeed Bustillos is dead, i am alive 2008, but I mean I take the picture of this canvas in Colegio Químico Farmcéutico, where I am member --190.20.120.157 22:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC) penarc[reply]

Woohoo

[edit]

Cloak. -Nard the Bard 02:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sears Roebuck Building - Spokane.jpg

[edit]

Why would an image in the public domain need a "permission" tag? Murderbike (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Overreactions

[edit]

Hello there. I've been watching the deletion requests of the Anti Israel flags and now the Anti Poland flag. I agree if people doubt the images being within the scope of Wikipedia projects. This is no problem to me. I'm having difficulties seeing the necessity of this trend on Wikipedia. What MUST NOT be an argument is racism. Regarding a crossed out Israel flag as anti semitism is naïve and over-sensitive. This is an aspect of satire and everyday journalism, do you want censorship on most of the world's press? A crossed out Israel flag is against the way the state, founded in the midst of the 20th century when the anti semitic wave was already cooling down, is being run. Nothing against Jews. And I for myself would find a crossed out German flag funny, for I regard the German politicians as dull elitist bastards produly wearing blinders... does that make me racist? No. I still like some regions here, I'm even proud half-Frisian.
The reason I am writing to you is:

  • I criticize your seriosity.
  • I am really angry about the way this whole thing is developing on Commons. And you kindled that unreflected behaviour with your activity, least starting that deletion request with the flag of Poland and showing major activity on the first Anti Israel debate.


And to maybe solve this without the additional bad feelings I have when strolling around in one of these strange deletion requests, I write you. And maybe for the sake of getting rid of images in bad quality which nobody needs - without these arguments.
Please take a while, reconsider your arguments on deletion reqeusts and if you like, you may answer on this. • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) wtf? • 01:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi. I'm not the one who said anything about the Jews. I said the files were making a bad POINT. Please re-read the nominations and direct the above comments at the person they deserve to go to, not me. -Nard the Bard 02:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo_Arelerland.jpeg

[edit]

Moien, Pourquoi supprimé un Autocollant qui est partout dans notre zone ???? le symbol de notre region !!!! --Bernard Piette (talk) 11:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sans un mot ! No comment : L'Inquisition ...Nard the Bard L'Inquisition ... --Bernard Piette (talk) 14:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Courrier_-_Ville_d_Arlon_signe_par_Biren_-_Histoire_du_Blason_par_Jean-Marie_Triffaux.jpg

[edit]

Moien, Mon courrier ! le mien ... a moi ! que dire d'autres ! le desternataire .. c'est MOI ! alors que faire !? comme ma lettre en en francais .. alors je cause en francais ! --Bernard Piette (talk) 15:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No comment : L'Inquisition ...Nard the Bard L'Inquisition ...

Ayuda

[edit]

Hola, Nard, me dirijo a ti a ver si me puedes ayudar. Subí a commons la imagen Image:Diario de Lisboa 15-08-1936.jpg pero no aparece la vista previa y no la puedo utilizar para los artículos que la necesito, a ver si me puedes echar una mano. Un saludo y gracias, --Goldorak (talk) 18:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por tu ayuda, fue un error mío. Subí la imagen Image:Diario de Lisboa.jpg y no se veía, así que luego subí Image:Diario de Lisboa 15-08-1936.jpg, y ahora están duplicadas, así que he solicitado el borrado de la primera. Saludos --Goldorak (talk) 21:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Filbot

[edit]

Really thanks! :-) Now the bot will automatically skip the <pre> sections and the <nowiki> sections! :-) I've tested it right now, and works really fine ;-) Thanks again, --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 13:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not-PD-US-URAA

[edit]

Hi Nard. Thanks for the answer in Commons:Deletion requests/Image:KingswayHaifa.JPG, but I didn't really understood it, and since it's not very relevant to that image, I'll ask you here - lets say I want to upload a photograph that had been taken and published in 1950 in Israel. It's in the public domain in Israel according to {{PD-Israel}}, but it's copyrights had been restored in the US, since it wasn't PD in 1996. Can I upload it with both {{PD-Israel}} and {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}, or it can't be uploaded to commons? Alonr (talk) 17:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship

[edit]

Hey,

I know about that “Commons is not censored” thing, and I really don't have a problem with most of the nude images everywhere right here. But I really don't get the point to keep such images like Image:Can you lick it ! (Klashorst).jpg. I mean, serious, did you read the description of that image? “Woman rubbing ice-cream on her shaved genitalia.” If someone wants to see that, he can go to Youporn or XNXX, but Wikimedia? Come on... --DerAndre (talk) 12:33, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Papua New Guinea statues at Stanford

[edit]

Here are some more US statues. Do you think this is an obvious case requiring quick deletion or do you prefer to wait ?

This was made in 1994, ("Project Duration: 5/1/94 - 9/16/94" according to this page). Teofilo (talk) 16:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • These appear to be replicas of much older public domain statues. I'd argue there's nothing newly creative about them, and thus are PD per L Batlin and son v. Snyder[1]. If they are copyrightable though they are definitely copyrighted. Anything after 1989 is. -Nard the Bard 19:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I answered there : Commons:Deletion requests/1994 Papua New Guinean sculptures at Stanford. Teofilo (talk) 09:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sculptures in New York

[edit]

Same sort of problem for these : what do you suggest ?

Teofilo (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teofilo (talk) 10:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Imágenes duplicadas

[edit]

Gracias tío... soy un poco novato aún con los procedimientos... aprovecho para preguntarte una duda... tú sabes porque se ve mal el thumbanail de estas dos imagenes SVG?, fijate que los escudos son inclompletos... Saludetes Valdavia (talk) 12:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Nard... fijate que el escudo de la bandera, se ve incompleto... pero solo a partir de cierto tamaño..., sin embargo se está dejando trozos del escudo por renderizar... te lo pongo un poco más grande para que veas la diferencia... , fijate como en un caso en el que el tamaño es de 100px se corresponde con este escudo... mientras que en el caso de 80px no. Por cierto, donde has aprendido castellano tan bien?... Hablas perfectamente... Saludos Valdavia (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYWTS photos

[edit]

Thanks for the note. I was aware of that already, but it is always good to make sure people do know that. I guess we've both read this, and know that the important bits are points 3 and 4. Point 3 being "NYWT&S staff photographs are in the public domain per the instrument of gift. These photos can be recognized by such stamps as "World-Telegram photo" or "World-Telegram photo by Ed Palumbo."" The Muhammad Ali one, for example, says here: "No copyright restriction known. Staff photographer reproduction rights transferred to Library of Congress through Instrument of Gift." That seems pretty clear, even though there is no hi-res picture directly linked. I never got round to creating a template like the one seen at Template:PD-USNWR. Would you have time to do that? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 19:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image check request

[edit]

Copying the request over here from the VP: "Is there a place here to ask for image checks? en:List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry is being reviewed at en:Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry, and I tried to review the images, but got bogged down. I asked at en:Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, but was told that they were "Commons" images. Anyone here able to help?"

Thanks for the offer to help with this. I'm going to drop a note back at the en-wikipedia review page. Do you have an account there? If you really feel up to it, there were some pictures removed from an earlier version of the page, some of which might actually only need a bit more paperwork, though some might need to go. If some would be OK on Wikipedia but not here, please let me know. One thing I wanted to ask is whether there is anyway to leave a note on each picture as it is reviewed, as one of the things that really annoys me about image reviews in general is that if someone thinks an image is OK, there is rarely any incentive to leave a note saying that (to save time for the next person looking at the image). Are there ways to do that? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 20:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The review is in progress. I guess you're right, the ones that seem ok rarely get tagged as such. Yes, a few would be better on Wikipedia than here. If you want I can compile a better list than the one I've got now, which is just the bad ones. My en.wiki name is the same as this name, but I am usually over here if you want to talk to me :) Cheers. -Nard the Bard 20:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. No time to say more, but will check back in a few days. Re: marking images as OK to save time for others, image patrolling would be great if trusted people could be identified and a backlog could be avoided. Is there such a thing? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 23:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Villagepump

[edit]

Hi,

I just read your message in the villagepump. It makes me sad to hear you think i must stop as a admin.

I know about FOP and stuff but when i am not sure of something i will nominate for deletion. That way i can read what others say, and use that next time it happen.

Cheers, Sterkebaktalk 05:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC) Btw did ment the stateu of David Beckham? Two years ago i visited that place.. But i can remember that there was a sign that you may not take photo's. So than the image isn't oké? Or am i wrong?[reply]

Image:Cyrillic letter Ukrainian Ie.png

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Cyrillic letter Ukrainian Ie.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 01:45, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nard_the_Bard/archive3&oldid=36655758"