User talk:Moroder/Archives 2014-1

Feliz año nuevo --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Crëusc de Secëda d inviern-edit.jpg

Bonjour et meilleurs voeux Wolgang, je me suis permis de téléchargé une version que j'ai édité (crop, WB, highlights), si elle te plais tu peux la nominer comme version alternative ou pas. Bien amicalement. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

merci mon ami, mais je prefere la mien plus grande. Je suis tres content si tu la nomine pour FPC (pourqoi pas?), merci encore pour ton intérêt --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church of St. Ulrich in Gröden. Facade at night in winter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church of Ortisei, eastern aspect and steeple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cappella Laghel cronologia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Ulrich in Gröden nachts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What happened to the sky ? Is it raining ?--Jebulon 17:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC) Comment No, snowing ;-) --Moroder 17:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC) Support OK. We had only rain in Paris for Xmas... (please see annotations, but good for QI)--Jebulon 18:23, 29 December 2013 (UTC) Done Corrected horizontal lines hte gost is probably someone moving, the place was very crowded. Thanks for the hint. --Moroder 17:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela di tumei de nuet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fis Ski World Cup Val Gardena Ciampinoi start hut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's tilted on left, you can take for reference the skier's door --Christian Ferrer 12:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 14:06, 28 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Interesting image --Christian Ferrer 15:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fis Ski World Cup Val Gardena Ciampinoi start.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dustspots (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 05:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks!--Moroder 14:06, 28 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Mezdi Seiser Alm SO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Prudence

You contributed a photo of Prudence

File:Prudenza Gaetano Fusali.jpg

However, a reader suggests that the sculptor is en:Gaetano Susali, not Gaetano Fusali. My cursory review supports this, but you may well be in a better position to check.

If so, we should change the image name, and edit the caption on this page.

I'll do either or both if you confirm the name.--Sphilbrick (talk) 00:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

I will have checked it by the end of the week, thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L crep de Seceda d inviern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Martin Kraft 01:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schipiste Seceda.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice --Iifar 19:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Pinturicchio, tight crop, Santa Maria del Popolo, your comment and other stuff

Bonjour Wolfgang et très bonne année à toi et aux tiens.

J'espère que tu continueras à nous régaler avec les images de ton cher Sud-Tyrol et de ses merveilles.

I hope we will enjoy pictures of other works from your ancestors too, they all are very nice.

I thank you for your comment about my "della Rovere" chapel in Sta Maria del Popolo in Rome. Alas, I'm already a bit "tricky" with this image in the corners, and I did my maximum. As you imagine (or know by yourself), no tripod are allowed in such touristical and religious places of Rome. Therefore I had to play with chairs, columns etc in order to have an immobile camera... and I obtained a very rotated picture.

Then came the question: keep the tight cropped altar, or crop. I voted (pro=1, contra=0, abst.=0), and decided to keep, because it shows (entirely) in foreground the CoA of Cardinal della Rovere, "owner" of the chapel, named after him. (As Italian, you surely may know that "della Rovere" is the name of a very powerful family, which most representative members are popes Sixtus IV and Julius II), and I like the tree Quercus Robur (meaning "della Rovere") on the CoA. So it is an interesting encyclopedic information to me.

BtW, did you notice that, on the famous portrait of Julius II by Raphaël, on can see two nice oak tree (della Rovere) acorns as decoration of his chair ?

But, on the other hand, yes, the crop is very tight at bottom, so I don't know what to do, because at the end, the main subject of the photograph is the fresco. Furthermore, The oak tree CoAs are visible on both sides too. Well, I think I'll crop, but I'll keep the first version too.

That's the story of this picture in my meaning, and you can see that I'm full of doubt... Anyway, what a marvel !! I did not have the time to rework this picture before Xmas, and with regret I was not ready for send it to you as a reply to your kind Xmas message !...

Happy new year again, dear Dottore. --Jebulon (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

• Mon ami, thanks so much for your encouraging appreciations and your nice words for the Christmas greetings which I return wholeheartedly. Thanks also for the information on the symbols of the Della Rovere family which I never was aware of and actually I can see such a wealth of symbols all over your picture. Certainly the whole picture acquired under difficult circumstances, which I easily recognize from my own experience, must be kept and I do not hesitate to promote it as QI. I believe you are also entitled to nominate for QI a narrower crop to put more emphasis on the retable of Pinturicchio which it deserves as I originally suggested. I am striked also by the phallic-power meaning of the glands on the popes chair. Good idea to analize very thouroghly every piece of art. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Third station of the cross Arco Laghel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kornkasten beim Breitner Villanders 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Crëusc de Secëda d inviern.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crëusc de Secëda d inviern.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groomed skirun from Seceda Val Gardena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Twelfth station of the Cross Laghel detail Saint Magdalena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --P e z i 16:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! First station of the cross Josef Moroder Lusenberg in Laghel Arco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good.--Jebulon 20:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Using of file

Dear Dr. Moroder, I use your very interesting file "Fetus plain ..." to illustrate possibility of modern ultrasound diagnosis i Ukrainian Wikipedia. I write your name as the author. Best wishes Victor Grinchenko vgrinchenko@yahoo.com

• It's my pleasure--93.33.243.179 22:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rabensteiner Hof Villanders 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:18, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Mezdi Seiser Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Groomed skirun from Seceda Val Gardena.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Groomed skirun from Seceda Val Gardena.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
War memorial chapel in Urtijëi at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I think term "at night while snowing" is not necessary and it's more a description than a scope. Halavar (talk) 20:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good scope and useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Missale romanum MDCLI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bona pictura, sicut erat in principio, et nunc et semper et in saecula saeculorum amen.--Jebulon 16:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)  Comment Gratias tibi ago permagnas --Moroder 17:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter Widum Villanders SW.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, however I think the sharpening radius is a bit too high --DXR 20:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Comment I havn't done any sharpenig. Thanks for the review --Moroder 17:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC) Oh, then my eyes must have deceived me, never mind ;) --DXR 14:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winteransicht Plattkofel vom Zallinger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Keymeulen 08:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fis Ski World Cup Val Gardena Ciampinoi arrival.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacred heart of Jesus in Arco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You messed up the crop at the top - the document edge is intruding. Mattbuck 21:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC) fixed Thanks --Moroder 23:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 12:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Mezdi Seiser Alm Schigebiet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Persönlichkeitsrechte

Hallo! Vielen Dank für deine Ergänzung bei meinem Bild File:San Diego (California, USA), Embarcadero -- 2012 -- 4.jpg. Allerdings teile ich die Ansicht nicht. Personen sind immer einmal zu sehen, aber auf dem Bild ist ein Fahrzeug abgebildet. Die Personen sind nur Beiwerk. Das reicht für die Persönlichkeitsrechte nicht aus. Im Umkehrschluss wäre so gut wie jede Aufnahme mit Personen von dieser Problematik betroffen. Wenn's recht ist, entferne ich den Hinweis wieder. --XRay ^talk 06:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Ich glaube die Warnung steht hauptsächlich zum Schutz des Urhebers der Datei, ist aber sicher ein Optional und deshalb kannst du sie gerne entfernen. Es liesse sich sicher diskutieren in deinem Fall, aber man sprcht ja von "identifiable people und nicht vom "Gewicht" der Personen im Bild. Wünsch dir einen schönen Tag und...viele schöne Bilder! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church of La Val, statue of John of Nepomuk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:17, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The "Lech Sant" lake, view with the Odles mountain range.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:57, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Fis downhill race run "Saslong", first tract of the piste.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 21:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberfinserhof Lajener Ried Alter Eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sorà y Zecca da Ruatsch a Calfosch da pert de mesdi.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sorà y Zecca da Ruatsch a Calfosch da pert de mesdi.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mill "Rudiferia de sura" in Badia, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 13:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael church in Villnöß, internal view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 14:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Duomo vecchio (Brescia) - Outside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 21:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metal plough in France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Creusc de Piz Ciaulonch.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is strange lines in the sky (see note) and is the crux tilted in reality or is it the image? --Christian Ferrer 06:39, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Done Fixed the lines, the cross is tilted as you can see here. Thanks for the hint--Moroder 09:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)  Support ok, I trust you for the tilt but why a link to the same image? --Christian Ferrer 11:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC) oops--Moroder 11:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cablecar Seceda over Mareufer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 22:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dlieja Sacun Santa Barbara.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dlieja Sacun Santa Barbara.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Navajo Generating Station from the south.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Navajo Generating Station from the south.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sa la Cresc sun Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now --DXR 13:28, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Nikon D800

Hallo Wolfgang,

ich weiß nicht, ob Du dich noch an mich erinnerst. Wir hatten vor längerer Zeit mal miteinander zu tun. Ich hatte dir mal ein Bild mit HDR entsprechend bearbeitet; es handelte sich seinerzeit um ein Bild einer Häusertüre.

Ich möchte mir dieses Jahr eine Vollformat von Nikon holen und liebäugele tatsächlich mit dem "Dickschiff", der D4 weil die nun mal unstrittig den besten Dynamikumfang hat und es mir eigentlich auch darauf ankommt. Allerdings gibt es auch ein paar Gründe, die durchaus für die D800 bzw. D800 E sprechen. Nun weiß ich, dass Du seit geraumer Zeit mit der D800 fotografierst. Ich hätte mal zwei Fragen an Dich.

(1) Wie ist deine Erfahrung mit der Kamera. Was findest Du gut, was eventuell nicht so gut? Kannst Du sie weiterempfehlen? Gibt es sonst noch was zu beachten?

(2) Du machst motivisch tolle Bilder. Allerdings stelle ich öfter fest, dass Du teilweise ein Schärfeproblem mit den Bildern hast. Ich habe gelesen, dass es bei der D800 sehr darauf ankommt, nur die besten Objektive zu verwenden sonst würden die Abbildungsleistung nämlich eher zu wünschen lassen. Nun weiß ich nicht, welches Objektiv Du benutzt und ob deine partiellen Schärfeprobleme daher rühren oder ob es ganz andere Ursachen hat. Vielleicht kannst Du zu dem Punkt speziell auch etwas ausführen. Immerhin ist astreine Schärfe einer der wichtigsten Punkte.

Viele Grüße nach Südtirol --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Wladyslaw, Ich glaube ich kann mich an die barocke Haustür erinnern, es war eines meiner ersten Bilder mit der D800 Kamera, etwa April 2012. Nun zur Sache: ich glaube die D800 ist immer noch die beste Kamera was Auflösung betrifft ( D800E ist anscheinend noch besser!). Das brauche ich weil ich hauptsächlich Gebäude, Kunst und Landschaften fotografiere (meistens auch bei voller Sonne mit Stativ, Selstauslöser nach 5s und Spiegelverzögerung 2s).

Mein meistbenütztes Obiektiv ist Nikkor 24-70/2,8 von Nikon (zu 98%) dann hab ich noch das 70/200 mm 2.8 und ganz neu das Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm 1:4G ED VR (habs noch kaum benützt). Also an Objektiven dürfte es bei mir nicht fehlen. Ich glaube bei Bildern in der Größe und Auflösung der D800 ist man viel Anspruchsvoller und man glaubt (auch viele Reviewer) oft zu Unrecht es sei unscharf und man müsse mehr sehen als drinn ist. Es kann aber schon sein, dass die D800 manchmal mit der Schärfe (Fokusierung) schlimme Tricks spielt und andere Kameras in dieser Hinsicht besser sind. Ein Freund von mir, der viel Events fotografiert, ist mit grosser Genugtuung auf die Nikon Df umgestiegen. Mir gefällt besonders an der Df die Möglichkeit der analogen Einstellungen wie bei den alten Kameras!

Ich dachte auch an die D4 bevor die D800 erschien. Kann auch sein, dass der Dynamikumfang höher ist - ich kann das nicht beurteilen aber ich muss schon sagen dass ich vom Dynamikumfang der D800 oft sehr begeistert bin. Wenn du damit meinst dass die Belichtung meistens stimmt dann kann ich mich nicht beklagen. Zulezt ist die D4 ganz schön teuer und du kannst mit dem Geld in gute Objektive investieren. Wünsch dir eine gute Wahl! Lass mir wissen. LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

wenn ich darf? Ich hab die D800E der Unterschied zur 800 ist eigentlich nur, dass der Tiefpassfilter fehlt. Dafür macht sie "noch schärfere" Bilder. Das Problem ist nur, dass eine Vollformat durch ihre Auflösung nichts verzeiht was die Schärfe betrifft. Ich habe Bilder von meiner alten D300S die mindestens so scharf sind, wie meine Neue. Ich hab auch die selben Objektive wie Moroder. Bei meinem 105er Macro hatte ich jedoch einen "Backfocus", den ich nachstellen musste. Seither ist auch dieser Scherben scharf. lg. --Böhringer (talk) 11:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, willkommen ;-) Bei manchen Bildern von mir mit der D800 wie hier ist mir die Unschärfe schon ein Rätsel --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

so ein schönes Bild! Du hast der Belichtung viel zu wenig Zeit gegeben. 1/1.600 und das bei einer rel. offener Blende von 6,3. An der Brennweite lag es auf keinen Fall, die ist gut. Also wenn du schon auf Stativ bist und mit Selbstauslöser und Spiegelvorauslösung arbeitest, hätte ich mindestens bei Blende 10 oder 16 fotografiert. D.h. Blendenvorwahl mit Zeitautomatik. Es könnte aber auch sein, das der Bildstabilisator (VR2) eingeschalten war. Dieser muss bei Stativaufnamen auf alle Fälle ausgeschaltet sein. Hoffe ich konnte dir weiterhelfen. lg --Böhringer (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Jetzt möchte ich auch mal (auch wenn ich keine D800 besitze): Was die angeblichen Anforderungen an die Objektive angeht gehört dies, zumindest z.T., in den Bereich der "Märchen". Die D800 hat in etwa die identische Pixeldichte wie die D7000. Die D7100 stellt sogar deutlich höhere Anforderungen an das Auflösungsvermögen der Objektive (bezogen auf den DX-Bildkreis) als die D800. Richtig ist, dass die D800 gerade in den Randbereichen eine Diva ist. Ich habe auch schon mit einer D800 von einem guten Bekannten fotografiert und da war sogar bei dem Ultra-Weitwinkel-Referenzobjektiv Nikon 14-24 eine geringe Randunschärfe zu erkennen.
Was die Bilder von Wolfgang angeht, so habe ich eher den Verdacht, dass die "Unschärfe" mit der fehlenden Nachbearbeitung zusammenhängt. Meines Wissens belässt du die Fotos so wie sie aus der Kamera kommen, oder? Ggf. könntest du probieren in den PictureControl-Einstellungen deiner Kamera die Schärfe anzuheben. Insbesondere beim 70-200 f/2.8 VR II dürfte kaum Unschärfe erkennbar sein - das Objektiv ist ja schärfer als die Reviewer auf QIC erlauben :) Mit dem 70-200 habe ich selbst an einer D800 einige Fotos machen können und die Schärfe ist selbst in der 100%-Ansicht über jeden Zweifel erhaben. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldungen an alle.

Wolfgang: möglicherweise hängt das Unschärfeproblem, wie Tuxyso gesagt hat, mit der fehlenden Nachbearbeitung zusammen. Ein anderer Grund könnte auch der sein, dass Du recht viel im Zeitautomatik-Modus fotografierst und nicht im Vollmanuellen. Das nimmt nach meiner Erfahrung auch einige deutliche Quäntchen an Schärfekapazität weg. Denn generell sollen normale Bilder (Sonne im Rücken, Standardsituation) auch ohne Nachbearbeitung hinreichend scharf sein. Das ist sicher kein D800-Problem. Maximal eines der D800E wegen des fehlenden Tiefpassfilters. --Wladyslaw (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Liebe Freunde. Es ist für mich eine große Freude und Ehre einige der besten und begeistertstes Wikifotografen in einer Diskussion auf meiner Seite beherbergen zu können.

Nun, man spricht hier von Märchen und einige Sachen hier klingen wirklich wie Märchen

• eine kurze Belichtung führt zu Unschärfe
• auch eine Zeitautomatik
• D7000 hat gleichviel Pixel wie D800
• Unschärfe wegen fehlender Nachschärfung

Ich weiß dass eine hohe Blende wegen der Refraktion eine Unschärfe zur Folge hat. Oder eine niedere Blende chromatische ab. Verursacht. Da gibt es aber klare physikalische Beweise. Gibt es auch Beweise für die "Märchen".

Verzeiht mir bitte! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Ich weiß zwar nicht was genau an der oberen Aufzählung Märchen sein soll und vor allem warum. Ein Märchen ist es jedoch ganz gewiss nicht, dass Du im M-Modus im allgemeinen die besseren Bilder erzeugst als in allen anderen Modi. Letztlich kann dein eigenes Auge nämlich die Lichtsituation besser einschätzen als alle noch so ausgeklügelte Nikon-Sensorik, mal ganz davon abgesehen dass es in vielen Fällen auch besser ist, selbst zu entscheiden ob man lieber etwas über- oder unterbelichtet. Überlässt man die Wahl der Automatik, so erhält man oft Ergebnisse, die weniger befriedigen. Diese Erfahrung macht jeder Fotograf im Laufe seiner Laufbahn. Auch ich habe mich anfangs vor dem M-Modus gesträubt. Externer Lesetipp dazu

D7000 hat gleichviel Pixel wie D800? Wieso sind 16 Megalpixel gleich viel wie 36 Megapixel? Das halte ich wiederum für ein Märchen. ;-) Oben war ja auch nicht vom Vergleich der Pixel der beiden Kameras die Rede sondern der Pixeldichte und das ist ja nicht falsch, da es sich hier ja um zwei verschiedene Sensorgrößen handelt und das Verhältnis von Pixel/Sensorgröße (oder der Pixelpitch genannt, D800 4,8µm, D7000: 4,7 µm) durchaus vergleichbar ist. Tuxyso hat also kein Märchen erzählt.

Generell hat niemand hier behauptet, deine Bilder seien wegen fehlender Nachschärfung unschaf. Vielmehr war die Aussage, dass man häufig bessere Schärfeergebnisse erhält wenn man nachbearbeitet, das kann (muss aber nicht) einen Nachschärfungsprozess zur Folge haben.

Alles in allem: bitte fass die Vermutungen von uns nicht als Mäkeln auf. Zumindest ich von meiner Seite wollte nicht besserwisserisch rüber kommen. Sollte das der Fall gewesen sein, dann entschuldige. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Naaa auf keinem Fall. Ich freu mich ja sehr für die Diskussion, man lernt ja vieles. Nun zum ersten Absatz: wir sprechen ja von Schärfe du sprichst ja jetz von Belichtung. Da bin ich ganz deiner Meinung. Ich arbeite auch meistens mit Aperture Priority und benütze dann viel die unter- und Überbelichtungsschraube und mach dann womöglich 2-3 Bilder. Hat das aber mit der Schärfe was zu tun? LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Ja, da gibt es in der Tat einen Zusammenhang. Denn die Entscheidung, ob die Kamera die Belichtung selbst wählt oder du sie vorgibst hat unmittelbaren Einfluss auf die Schärfe. Grundsätzlich versucht zwar die Automatik natürlich ein optimales Schärfeergebnis hinzubekommen, aber das gelingt eben nicht immer. Und wenn du die Parameter Blende, ISO und Belichtung eben manuell vorgibst wirst Du mit etwas Übung schnell feststellen, dass deine Bilder an Schärfe gewinnen. Probier es einfach aus! --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Verzeih mir, aber hier gehts schon wieder ins märchenhafte... Ich stelle natürlich ISO und Blende manuell ein. Also bleibt nur die Zeit. Nun angenommen ich habe alle Wackelfaktoren ausgeschaltet, wie kann denn die automatische Zeiteinstellung auf die Schärfe einwirken?--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Der Lichtmesser jeder Kamera misst einen Lichtwert, übergibt ihn der Elektronik und nimmt einen mathematischen Mittelwert an, um die Belichtungszeit zu bestimmen. Dieser so ermittelte Wert für die Belichtungszeit nimmt keine Rücksicht darauf, ob Du das Bild aus der freien Hand oder mit Stativ schießt, Umgebungslicht welches anders ausfällt als das Licht mit dem das Objekt beschienen wird führt ebenfalls zu fragwürdigen Belichtungswerten. Das sind nur einige klassische Beispiele dafür, dass die Belichtungsautomatik nach dem programmierten Parametern zwar korrekte aber für die natürlichen Gegebenheiten völlig ungeeignete Belichtungswerte annimmt. Das kann aber ein geschultes Auge sehr schnell erkennen und durch die manuelle Vorwahl einen deutlich geeigneteren Belichtungswert einsetzen, was zwangsläufig zu einer besseren Schärfe führt. Die Zeitautomatik hat auch ihre Berechtigung, genau dann wenn Schärfe unwichtig wird bzw. die Hintergrundunschärfe erreicht werden soll, z.B. bei Portraitaufnahmen. Bei Architekturaufnahmen ist allerdings Schärfe das A und O, daher ist bei diesem Genre fast immer der vollmanuelle Modus zu empfehlen. Du siehst: keine Märchen, nur Physik. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Wladyslaw! Mir ist alles ganz klar bis auf "einen deutlich geeigneteren Belichtungswert einsetzen, was zwangsläufig zu einer besseren Schärfe führt". Für das "zwangsläufig" bräuchte ich noch eine Physikalische Erklärung ;-)) Vielen Dank für deine Bemühungen --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Ich verstehe ehrlich gesagt nicht, was ich dir begreiflich machen soll. Wenn eine Kamera aufgrund des Lichtmessers z.B. feststellt, dass viel Licht vorhanden weil die Kamera selbst in einer lichtstarken Umgebung gehalten wird, das eigentliche Objekt aber eher lichtschwach beleuchtet wird unterstellt die Kamera einen Belichtungswert, der zwangsläufig ungeeignet ist. Ebenso verhält es sich im umgekehrten Fall. D.h. die Belichtungswerte werden zu hoch oder zu tief für die jeweilige Situation gewählt. Und falsche Belichtungswerte können schnell verwackelt werden, was wiederum konsekutiv meist unerwünschte Unschärfe herbeiführt. Würde die Kamera ihren Lichtsensor nicht in der Kamera haben sondern am Objekt, würde das nicht passieren. Nicht umsonst verwenden Profifotografen externe Lichtmesser, um das Problem nicht zu haben. Davon abgesehen: selbst wenn du den perfekten Lichtsensor an der perfekten Stelle hättest: auch dann fotografiert man besser im M-Modus. Weil der Fotograf vielleicht die Freiheit haben will, durch die Lichtmenge den Bildeindruck selbst in die Hand zu nehmen. Hoffe, ich konnte mich nun verständlich machen. Weiterhin gut Licht! --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

OK, also um abzuschliessen: der "physikalische" Zusammenhang zwischen Belichtung und Schärfe besteht darin dass, je niederer die Belichtungszeit desto geringer die Möglichkeit des Verwackelns und desto grösser die Schärfe und umgekehrt. Alles klar. Gut Licht --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Ich weiß nicht on Ihr diese Seite schon kennt: Beispiel:Nikkor 24-70/2,8. Hier hole ich mir zumindest die Informationen über die Objektive und deren physikalischen Eigenschaften her. Der Rest, die Phototechnik, ist natürlich eine fundamentale Erfahrungsache eines jeden Photographen. Wichtig ist ferner noch: auch ein noch so gutes Objektiv kann womöglich "fehlerhaft (dejustiert)" ausgeliefert worden sein. Ich z.B. habe von meinen Objektiven zwei wieder, wegen technischer Mängel, zur Reparatur bzw. zum Austausch zurückgegeben. Auf allzeit gut Licht, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC) P.S: ok, die philosophische photosophische ;-) Frage Canon oder Nikon bleibt unberücksichtigt ;-)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seceda y Odles dal purtoi de Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Also good WB - the snow shadows are not magenta :) --Cccefalon 17:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Giacomo dell Orio facciata ovest con campanile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment please remove dust spots. --P e z i 22:54, 5 February 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 16:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --P e z i 13:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pfarrkirche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfarrkirche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Using your photo

Hello,

I am writing to ask your permission to include your photo of "The Four Tetrarchs in Venice" (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_four_tetrachs_in_Venice_-_Porphyr_stone_sculpture_general_view.JPG) in the following publication:

Book Title: David’s Sling Author: Victoria Coates Publisher: Encounter Books Publication Date: August 19th, 2014

The book will appear in both print and digital formats. If you require any additional information, please let me know.

PLEASE REPLY TO: michael.sobolik@gmail.com.

Many thanks,

Michael Sobolik

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla ciases a San Ciascian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support maybe a bird to clone out, anyway QI --Christian Ferrer 15:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Comment I've seen that birdie, didn't want to kill t, but now that you ask for it. I can't fin it anymore...--Moroder 22:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St Ulrich in Gröden Ostansicht Morgendämmerung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)  Neutral subject partly coverd, but great view on environment --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geisler and Secëda from Resciesa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Longia sota Nudrei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 11:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenbildchen Heilige Dorothea Klosterarbeit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Badia dl vieres de Gardenazza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Royal Saltworks of Arc-et-Senans, entrance building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

use of image

Thank you for the use of your ultrasound image--I have used it for a powerpoint presentation.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seceda Odles y cuecenes da Resciesa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 14:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

I used your sonogram image, Thank you!

I used the image to illustrate my bubble

http://www.bubblews.com/news/2359098-ultrasoundsonogram-results-are-in-it-is-a-girl

wish you all the best --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 04:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leben der Heiligen Katherina in Völs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iron grating in Ronda Spain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Du hast eine E-Mail. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Katharina in Breien Völs am Schlern Erzengel Kreuzigung Eingangstür.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leben der Heiligen Katherina in Völs pan.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maryrium der Heiligen Katherina in Völs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

show video form echo

Dear Mr. Moroder,

thank you for sharing this video with us. I used the video for my lecture at the HAN university in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. in this lecture I inform the students from speechtherapy, occupational therapy and dieticians about spina bifida. they are all in second last or last year of their study and learn about multidisciplinairy treatment.

your sincere, Pamela Kreeuseler speech therapist and lecture at the HAN university of applied science Nijmegen, the Neterlands pamela.kreeuseler@han.nl

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bildstock Ried Völs am Schlern Fresko rechts gerade.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Your decline of my nominations

Would you please reconsider your decline of my nominations on today's Quality image candidates ?

Those pictures do have a description (which is not the same on all of them), consisting in The event - the place - the date - the rider and the horse. It is right that 4 of them do represent the same rider (on two different horses).

What is missing according to you ?

Pleclown (talk) 15:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, it has become customary, it happened also to me, that pictures uploaded with the same description are declined by reviewers since it makes the task difficult to differentiate them in an edit outlay. Please rename the pictures, even a different number could help and I will cancel my decline - cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

I've numbered my nominations. Pleclown (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Christopher in Saint Catherine in Völser Aicha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However this is for sure not 16th century, but 1410! --Uoaei1 22:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leben der Heiligen Katherina in Völs 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, however for sure not 16th century, but 1410! --Uoaei1 22:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konsole St. Vigil Kirche in Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better. --Mattbuck 21:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans entry building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective not done. IMO large sky area too dominant. --Cccefalon 11:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 13:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Lots of sky, I suggest a crop. Mattbuck 22:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Done New crop, thanks --Moroder 07:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 21:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prossliner Schwaige Wetterkreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi imo, nice composition.--ArildV 00:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archives 2014-1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! First station of the cross Josef Moroder Lusenberg detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stevia Gröden-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lasties Meisules.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Mezdi input.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chedul y Gherdeina da Mont de Seura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Chedul y Gherdeina da Mont de Seura.jpg

Hallo Wolfgang,

ich weiß nicht, ob es dir aufgefallen ist. Aber im oberen Bild hat die Vorschaufunktion versagt. Das passiert immer dann, wenn du beim Abspeichern (möglicherweise ungewollt) die progressive Speichermethode auswählst. Ich habe das abgewählt und jetzt funktioniert auch die Vorschau wieder. Viele Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Wlad, ich sagte doch, hier brauchts einen wiki-nerd. Besten Dank --01:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech Sant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Dolomiten aus Villanders.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:59, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lasties exit 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good - would like to be there! --Uoaei1 15:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lasties start.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 09:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lasties exit.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Would even be better if the trees would not be cropped at the bottom. --Uoaei1 19:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks, but it is the only crop I have--Moroder 12:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

to use an ultrasound

Hello,

I am a student of pharmacy in France. I work on a thesis (epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs on pregnancy) and i would like to use an ultrasound of spina bifida to illustrate my thesis. Can I ? with your name in my biography (author).

Sorry for my english speaking :S

thank you

tiotezul@live.fr

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lasties bottom.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dantersasc Saslonch.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmolata Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image. IMO there are CAs.--XRay 09:49, 28 February 2014 (UTC) Nice. --Arctic Kangaroo 16:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmolada and NW canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. --Mattbuck 00:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella Ostflanke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 17:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stevia y furcela dla Piza.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lasties and Meisules .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Grand Canal Photo

Just wanted to advise you I was using your photo of the Grand Canal in Venice. It is a lovely photo. I am a Travel Consultant and will be using it on my Facebook page at

https://www.facebook.com/SunshineTravelCruise?ref=hl

and on my travel blog

http://travelwiththesun.blogspot.com

It is an amazing photo of a beautiful city! Thank you for sharing.

Sincerely

Linda Thomas Sunshine Travel & Cruise 503-780-5819 linda760@yahoo.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sassongher and Sas dla Santa Crusc Val Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cablecar Seceda 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ vinazer var.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 11:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crep de Boe da Calfosch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella South face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Rialto Bridge photo.

I enjoy promoting Wikimedia's photos on my facebook page. A few moments ago I posted your beautiful snap of the Rialto Bridge:

https://www.facebook.com/robert.berryman.73?ref=tn_tnmn

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cablecar Seceda Urtijëi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crep de Boe Pisciadu da Calfosch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The trees of the left are a bit tilted CW, but good quality IMO--Lmbuga 22:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC) fixed Thanks for the review --Moroder 22:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cable car Piz Sella.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama from Belvedere Dolomites.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice! --Sputniktilt 19:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sas de Forcia Sella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokomotive und Sellatürme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciampani dl Sela Sellatürme Sas Pordoi Sellajoch Schutzhütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Staub

Hallo Moroder, du hast in allen drei Kandidaten mit Himmel vom 19.3. - mich wundert´s, daß der Poco das übersehen hat - einen Staubfleck am Sensor, kaum der Rede wert (aber wemma schon hacklich san...). Der Fleck ist je nach Monitorgröße ca. 2-3 cm unter dem oberen Rand und etwas rechts der Mitte. Bitte wegstempeln. Ansonsten kann ich nur sagen: wenn ich die Pisten sehe frißt mich der Neid. Beste Grüße --Isiwal (talk) 21:09, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Dann musst du einfach gleich vorbeikommen! Danke. LG--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top station Dantercepies.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor vignetting but overall good --Poco a poco 18:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

your picture

Dear Dr Moroder,

We would like to inform you that we will use your picture of fetal nuchal translucency as a cover picture for our scientific report.

Many thanks and kind regards,

Gudrun Briat

Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre Gudrun BRIAT Verantwoordelijke communicatie en P&O Responsable de la communication et P&O Doorbuilding (10e verdieping) Kruidtuinlaan 55 – 1000 Brussel T +32 2 287 33 54 gudrun.briat@kce.fgov.be - www.kce.fgov.be Follow us on Twitter: @KCEfgov

It's my pleasure to contribute to the advancement of science and medical knowledge --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella Group from Porta Vescovo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 13:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilone cabinovia Arabba Porta Vescovo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountain hut Ciadinat Sëlva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 23:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergstazion Boè Alta Badia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Fodoma run in Arabba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:43, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Clear dust spot (see note)--Lmbuga 17:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Done Those nasty dustspots, seem to replicate while I kill them. Thanks --Moroder 23:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerial Tramway Porta Vescovo Arabba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good IMO, but dust spots. There are not easy to see (see notes), so I decided to promote the image  Support--Lmbuga 18:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Done, thanks --Moroder 23:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Barbara and Saint Dorothea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC) French translation provided.--Jebulon 20:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks Isiwal, thanks Jebulon --Moroder 17:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella Ostflanke 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Stagn Sella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition may be better, but image definitely conforms to all QI standards. --Nino Verde 07:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Stagn y pas Ciaulong.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamsblut Sankt Christina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. One light dustspot. --Iifar 13:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 13:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sasc dl lech de Boè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel Piz Sella connection Ciampinoi Plan de Gralba.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vallon sas dles diesc sas dles nuef.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I really like the image, but please have a look to the sky. There are several dust spots.--XRay 16:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Done Cleaned 6 DSs, thanks --Moroder 22:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vallon peaks Sella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Dust spots on the sky, right crop needs a fix, left crop is not very good (cropped person). --Iifar 15:31, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Done I really don't understand what you don't like of the right crop, could you please specify. Thanks --Moroder 16:08, 15 March 2014 (UTC)  Comment Right side has a crop error, notes added. --Iifar 16:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Done thanks for the hint --Moroder 19:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC) IMO Good quality. --Isiwal 21:40, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Moroder,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Cedla Sella Dolomites.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 12:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella and chairlift Fodom.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella group with Piz Boè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 00:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vallon chairlift.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 00:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vallon del Foss Col Turond Col Alton Sella.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 22:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col Turond Col Alton.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 22:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Permission for use!

Hey! Just sending you a message to request permission to use this in a powerpoint! It needs to be in APA format so whom may I write as the author? Thanks!

use what ?

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserkraftwerk Kardaun from above.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 14:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserkraftwerk Kardaun.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urtijei Furnes Gondola lift.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:22, 31 March 2014 (UTC)