User talk:Mikhail1990
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
[edit]Ja Mikhail Benette Ucat 16:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC) |
File tagging File:Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
4ing (talk) 15:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Please do not recreate deleted content
[edit]
If you have questions, you may ask them at the Village Pump in any of 42 languages or on my talk page. I will also watch for questions here on your talk page for at least a week.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Mikhail Benette Rånedo Ucat.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Please experiment in the sandbox
[edit]—LX (talk, contribs) 11:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please do not add Category:Oslo Voksenopplæring Skullerud to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mikhail Benette Rånedo Ucat.jpeg again. There are two reasons for this.
- First, it is not a valid category name -- Commons category names are in English. Second, Deletion Requests take only a special group of categories that are directly related to them -- they do not take general categories. If you do this a third time, you will be blocked from editing on Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:38, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- The same warning applies to adding the category to your user page. -- It is not a valid category name and User pages do not go in general categories. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Once again, do not add your user page to content categories like you did here. It does not belong there. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Oslo Voksenopplæring Skullerud.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikbenu1990.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikhail Benette Ranedo Ucat.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:57, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Ariel foto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Høvedya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Oslo VO Skullerud.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikhail Benette Ranedo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikhail Benette 1990.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikhail1990.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikhail Benette Ranedo Ucat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not recreate deleted content
[edit]
((qs)) . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not recreate deleted content
[edit]
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not recreate deleted content
[edit]
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
So far, you have contributed nothing of value to Commons. Please take the three days and decide whether you want to be a nuisance or a useful contributor. After the block is over, if you violate Commons rules again, you will blocked for a much longer period, perhaps forever. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Editing comments and notifications made by others
[edit]Please stop distorting talk page notices left by other users as you did here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. If you continue to edit other people's comments to misrepresent what they've said, there is a significant risk that your existing block may be extended in duration and that you may lose the privilege of being able to edit your talk page while you are blocked. The primary purpose of retaining that privilege is so that you can ask for the block to be lifted if you decide that you are ready to start contributing constructively – not so that you can use it for sandbox edits. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked
[edit]. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mailand vgs10.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mailand vgs10.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mailand vgs10.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
4ing (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikhail Benette Ranedo Ucat og Sara Monique 2.jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blue Elf (talk) 18:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikhail Benette Ranedo Ucat 9.jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blue Elf (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Mikhail Benette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Blue Elf (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Fernanda Nissens skole1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Chameleon222 (talk) 18:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Lillo1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 13:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Ragnhildtun 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ies (talk) 17:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Oslo VO Skullerud 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.
|