User talk:Martin Falbisoner/Archive 2 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Munich U-Bahnhof Candidplatz: platform.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Munich U-Bahnhof Wettersteinplatz: platform.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Munich U-Bahnhof Mangfallplatz: platform.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Munich subway station Mangfallplatz.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Mangfallplatz.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munich subway station St.-Quirin-Platz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 14:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munich subway station Candidplatz - exit.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Munich subway station Candidplatz.JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Munich subway station Candidplatz.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Candidplatz.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:28, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Thomas Jefferson's Monticello.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 08:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

(copy from en:wikipedia talk page)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuscan Landscape 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Maybe a bit too denoised but nice mood. --JLPC 17:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tuscan Landscape 7.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tuscan Landscape 7.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
i feel you are the one who deserve this star because of your awesome photos. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord March 2014 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord March 2014 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord March 2014 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord March 2014 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord March 2014 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Martin Falbisoner,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Night in Shinjuku 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Night in Shinjuku 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Night in Shinjuku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Night in Shinjuku 3.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Night in Shinjuku 3.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eisbach Surfer3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Baresi franco 21:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eisbach Surfer1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:56, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shinjuku O-gard, Tokyo, Japan, as seen from the west at blue Hour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Eisbach Surfer3.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eisbach Surfer3.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 06:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munich subway station Westfriedhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great, good quality and more. --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)--Villy Fink Isaksen 17:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Munich subway station Georg-Brauchle-Ring.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munich subway station Georg-Brauchle-Ring.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munich subway station Olympia-Einkaufszentrum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
U-Bahnhof Westfriedhof: platform.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
U-Bahnhof Olympia-Einkaufszentrum: platform.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
U-Bahnhof Georg-Brauchle-Ring: platform.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Munich subway station Westfriedhof.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Westfriedhof.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eisbach surfing in Munich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

File:Munich subway station Georg-Brauchle-Ring.JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Munich subway station Georg-Brauchle-Ring.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich subway station Georg-Brauchle-Ring.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bald Eagle Fuerstenfeldbruck 2014 -2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Brandhorst June 2014 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Brandhorst June 2014 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, but why is the sky so dark? --Kadellar 14:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
* Hmm, I did not use a polarizer... I also didn't boost the colors much. I guess the afternoon sun is to blame. And maybe my metering on the building ;-) --Martin Falbisoner 19:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
* Update: I've adjusted the sky a bit --Martin Falbisoner 20:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Fotografie in Island

Hallo Martin! ich werde in etwa 2 Wochen in Island mit meiner Kamera 4 Tage unterwegs sein. Ich werde die westliche Seite vom Land besuchen, vielleicht schaffe ich es bis zum Godafoss Wasserfall im Norden und ganz sicher bis zum Skógafoss Wasserfall und Sólheimajökull Gletscher, inkl. Golden Circle und Westlands. Hast du eine Empfehlung bzw. einen Tip was ich tun bzw. nicht tun sollte? Viele Grüsse, Poco2 19:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Diego! Du und Deine Kamera werdet sicherlich viel Spaß haben, nicht zuletzt, wenn Ihr Herr Eurer eigenen Zeiteinteilung sein solltet. Ich war mit einer Gruppe unterwegs, was fotografisch nicht immer ideal ist... Vorab: Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, daß es gelegentlich/zwischendurch/immer regnet, wird eher groß sein. Für Kamera wie Fotografen empfiehlt sich daher auf jedem Fall ein geeigneter Wasserschutz; überdies gibt's zumindest an einigen der Wasserfällen eine sehr starke Gischt. Obwohl ich da in einer unerwarteten Minute lernen durfte, daß die 5D III unglaublich viel mehr aushält, als ich ihr zugetraut hätte... Was Motivempfehlungen angeht: Rein fotografisch betrachtet ist Reykjavik nicht so der Brüller. Unter den Wasserfällen war der Gullfoss jetzt nicht mein Favorit. Es ist schwierig, da eine gute Position zu finden, die einerseits dem Motiv gerecht wird, und anderseits einigermaßen touristenfrei bleibt. Auch vom Geysir solltest Du Dir nicht zuviel versprechen. Er spuckt zwar brav alle paar Minuten, aber dann jeweils auch nur für ganz wenige Sekunden. Ansonsten ist alles von den Umständen abhängig. Ein Traum wäre etwa der Seljalandsfoss bei tiefstehender Sonne (s. z.B. hier oder hier.) Auch der Skógafoss gibt einiges her. Wie auch der Godafoss. Viele Grüße --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für die prompte Antwort Martin, ich hatte es bisher verpasst, vorbeizuschauen. Ich bin mit einem Auto unterwegs und nur von meiner Kamera begleitet :) Bis auf Godafoss werde ich die anderen Stellen schon besuchen, auch Seljalandsfoss. Ich wollte es von unten fotografieren aber werden nun auch darauf aufpassen, dass es beim Sonnenuntergang passiert. Mal gucken wieviel ist da los. Ich fliege mit dem Ziel in 4,5 Tage die westliche Hälfte (inkl. Westlands) zu besuchen. Viele Grüsse, Poco2 20:34, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hverfjall July 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Icelandic Landscape near Neskaupstaður July 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Skaftafell National Park July 2014 -2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 17:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skógafoss July 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seljalandsfoss July 2014 -1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seljalandsfoss July 2014 -2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selfoss July 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dettifoss July 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --undefined 08:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gullfoss July 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Generic1139 15:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hverarönd July 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --undefined 08:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svartifoss July 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 14:17, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goðafoss July 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow. --Mattbuck 20:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Goðafoss July 2014.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Goðafoss July 2014.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:View from Skaftafell National Park July 2014 -2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Skaftafell National Park July 2014 -2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hverfjall July 2014.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hverfjall July 2014.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Goðafoss, Iceland: long exposure in summer (N-NE view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selfoss July 2014-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Generic1139 22:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Selfoss July 2014.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Selfoss July 2014.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Skógafoss July 2014.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skógafoss July 2014.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White Storks in Poing September 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 15:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality. Yet one disturbance in the sky and the building is leaning to the left. --Cccefalon 17:32, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Should be Fixed --Martin Falbisoner 09:29, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacred Heart Church in Munich: exterior, as seen from the SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacred Heart Church in Munich: nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Munich September 2014 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:33, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Selfoss July 2014.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 23:37, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

(copy from en:wikipedia talk page)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bundeskanzleramt at Night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The lights in the lower range are indeed outshines anything, but overall very good quality. I also think it's good that the wind has moved the leaves and twigs in the foreground and these are thus less disturbing. --Steindy 22:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paul-Löbe-Haus at Night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Subway Station Bundestag.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! S-Bahn at Hauptbahnhof Berlin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Problem mit deiner Stimme

Hallo Martin! Schau doch noch mal auf Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weißstorch Walsrode 2014 02.jpg vorbei. Ich meine mich zu erinnern, dass du mit  Support gevotet hast. Irgendwie scheint deine Stimme verloren gegangen zu sein. Wenn ich das korrigiere hat das sicher so ein komischer "Geschmäckl" :) --Tuxyso (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AFIAP Certificate.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AFIAP Certificate.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

The own work of this file seems unlikely to me. Basvb (talk) 11:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:S-Bahn at Hauptbahnhof Berlin.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:S-Bahn at Hauptbahnhof Berlin.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Berlin Hauptbahnhof: S-Bahn in motion. Hall seen from the E side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul-Löbe-Haus Berlin, at night, as seen from the W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
U-Bahnhof Bundestag, Berlin, with train in motion..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bundeskanzleramt, Berlin, at night, as seen from the E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP

Hello. I just wanted to let you know I've nominated one of your photos on WP. You can see the nomination here. Thank you. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 15:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)