User talk:M0tty/archives 2013-2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1, Archive 2 Archive 2013-2014

Your assistance please

[edit]

You recently deleted, then redirected, File:Off-duty GIs tour Guantanamo's border gates.png to File:Off duty GIs, on a tour of the Guantanamo base, mingle just inside the gate to Cuba -a.jpg.

I recently did some maintenance on Category:Border gates at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. While I remember that there were similar images, I don't remember seeing any that were actually identical.

Could you please confirm that that the two images were identical, not merely similar?

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 20:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exact or scaled-down duplicate ......

[edit]

Hi M0tty, duplicate of what? You seem to have lost that in your deletion summary, see for example File:ISMG 3558 (3105218301).jpg. Can you please fix your script? Multichill (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Exact or scaled-down duplicate?

[edit]

I recall closely examining both versions of the images linked here and determining there were very slight processing differences. It probably does not matter in this case, but I am usually careful in these matters, checking the histograms and sometimes the jpeg artefacts, and I may have made a mistake. Was one clearly reduced in scale from the other? The remaining image is File:Nova et Accuratissima Terrarum Orbis Tabula (J.Blaeu, 1664).jpg. -84user (talk) 00:13, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lapin compris...

[edit]

Salut M0tty,

J'ai pas pigé ceci ! Quelles sous pages ? (Je ne trouve que des archives dans les sous pages, où vont les discussions en cours ? Quelle(s) page(s) dois-je mettre en suivi pour que les dernières modifs passent dans ma lds ?)

Cordialement. Musicaline (talk) 07:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup ! Ce qui est dommage, c'est que sur la sous page, on ne voir plus l'image et la vidéo du jour... @ plus ! Musicaline (talk) 06:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red brick wall texture.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivoire Phénicien - Louvre - AO11478.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good (an english description would be welcome). --Selbymay 08:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clair-obscur

[edit]

Your image of the Pala di San Giobbe is perfect. I am very glad to use it for the page Clair-obscur, on Wikipédia.fr. Thank you very much. Ismoon (talk) 12:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Schacontia

[edit]

Merci de supprimer ces fichiers. Cependant, j'ai enlevé Category:Crambidae, puisqu'elle contient Category:Schacontia et puis celle-ci ceux des espèces. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renommage Dijon Place Saint Bernard Hugues le pacifique detail statue.jpg

[edit]

Bonsoir. Je vous remercie d'avoir renommer ce fichier. Cordialement.François de Dijon (talk)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Labret phallic coddling.jpg

[edit]

Given this image was kept a month ago, your deletion was out of line. I have restored it, if you wish to have it deleted please send it to a deletion request. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, apparently I haven't restored it... let's take this to COM:AN. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:8K UHD resolution chart 3.svg

[edit]
File:8K UHD resolution chart 3.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Libron (talk) 06:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A little surprised

[edit]

I had put an {{On hold}} at this rename request, however, it seems to have been done by you. I will let you do the follow up.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavo cristatus (female) in Holland park, London (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavo cristatus (female) in Holland park, London (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granite paving tileable 2048x2048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Kadellar 00:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jan Verhas - La revue des écoles en 1878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎

[edit]

You are invited to join Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎. Useddenim (talk) 19:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JuTa 17:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rotatebot

[edit]

Thanks for notification, I'm looking for. Greetings,--Luxo 14:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason liège.svg

[edit]
File:Blason liège.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lemmens, Tom (talk) 14:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

localisation

[edit]

Cette photo File:Table de division et de conversion des fractions - Louvre - AO 6456.JPG : c'est un objet pris au louvre ou à louvres ? --Chatsam (talk) 19:00, 21 October 2013 (UTC)a+[reply]

ok j'ai changé la catégorie en ce sens (même si c'est pas la plus précise). a+ --Chatsam (talk) 06:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your feedback on this discussion

[edit]

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Variation among admins in application of duplicate policy with relation to different file types  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vue vers le bout du monde et chalet de Prazon.jpg

[edit]
File:Vue vers le bout du monde et chalet de Prazon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 21:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci avec beaucoup de retard

[edit]

Merci pour la réponse, vu que j'ai toujours la mauvaise habitude de commencer quelque chose sans jamais le terminer avant d'en commencer une autre, j'oublie parfois les premières. :) Merci pour le conseil je tâcherais de m'en souvenir. V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 02:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Triumph of History over Time - Anton Raphael Mengs

[edit]
The Triumph of History over Time - Anton Raphael Mengs has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Danny lost (talk) 18:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 !

[edit]
* * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:17, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angorakatze1903.jpg

[edit]

Would you mind re-uploading your version of File:Angorakatze1903.jpg into a separate file? I really appreciate the color, but the monochrome version appears to have better details to my eyes (at some parts I mean). To highlight, you would notice the difference in the shade of the right hand. I think the two versions both worth having separate file pages. --whym (talk) 06:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Whym ! It's done. The B/W file is now located at File:Angorakatze1903 (NB).jpg. Greetings. --M0tty (talk) 11:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! :) --whym (talk) 12:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Utilisation d'image

[edit]

Bonjour,

Je viens de lire que vous souhaitez être contacté lorsque l'on utilise vos images. C'est donc ce que je fais ici: j'ai utilisé quelques photos montrant les pompiers de Bruxelles en intervention afin d'illustrer certains articles de wikipédia, notamment celui à propos des pompiers en Beglique.

J'espere que vous n'y verrez pas d'inconvenients, si oui, faites le moi savoir! :)

A bientôt,

Hombre del rio (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Bonjour, je vois que vous avez taggé beaucoup d'images avec cette catégorie, mais un grand nombre de ces images ne sont pas des Featured pictures. Est-ce que vous ne vous seriez pas seulement fondé sur la présence de {{Assessments}} ? --Eusebius (talk) 06:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS Je n'ai eu le temps de reprendre que vos 50 dernières contribs. --Eusebius (talk) 06:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Eusebius, effectivement, je me suis basé sur la présence de {{Assessments}}. Dans quel cas ce modèle peut-il être apposé sur une image qui n'est pas remarquable ? Merci pour votre aide ! --M0tty (talk) 11:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Suivant les paramètres du template (doc), il peut être utilisé pour des images de qualité, des images qui sont des FP sur d'autres wiki, des images étiquetées comme ayant des bonnes proportions pour un fond d'écran... Pour avoir juste les FP de Commons, il faudrait vérifier qu'il y a le paramètre "featured=1". --Eusebius (talk) 14:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Action of soap on oil.ogv, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 02:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sciurus carolinensis in St James's Park 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe too much contrast, but still ok --Poco a poco 18:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosaïc in the Ben Youssef Madrasa, Morocco (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Bgag 19:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stucco of Saadian Tombs, Morocco (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bench and stuccos in the Villa Majorelle, Morocco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 17:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression de réverbération et amélioration de couleur

[edit]

Salut M0tty, le fichier suivant présente un défaut de réverbération. Pouvez-vous, s'il te plait, et dans la mesure du possible, le corriger en enlevant cette réflexion.

Peux-tu, également, apporter une légère amélioration de couleur à cette image :

Un grand merci d'avance. Amicalement, --Passionné d'architecture 19:54 15 September (UTC)

Mis à jour de votre presentation

[edit]

Bonsoir !

Merci pour la présentation que tu a fais, elle est très bien ! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pr%C3%A9sentation_des_Projets_Wikimedia_-_Ao%C3%BBt_2012_-_M0tty.pdf

Est ce que tu peux la mettre à jour car ce mercredi j'ai une formation (dans le cadre des activités de TN User Group) et je veux en servir ? https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Mois_de_la_contribution/Tunis

Merci infiniment,--Vivaystn (talk) 22:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Comestible rose in the Laquenexy orchard garden, Moselle, France (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Question A little bit too much with the aerosol can? Less is sometimes better... --Hubertl 18:56, 2 November 2014 (UTC) I have not used an aerosol. The flower was actually in this state.--M0tty 08:56, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality and real sharp! --Hubertl 14:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Schéma animé ?

[edit]

Bonjour M0tty, je découvre ton profil avec des compétences graphiques. Pourrais-tu trouver un contributeur qui pourrait réaliser une animation (genre .GIF) du schéma des positions des troupes lors de la bataille de Waterloo. ce serait tellement plus intelligible d'avoir une (ou plusieurs) animations [On approche du bicentenaire en 2015] plutôt que de longues et obscures explications en mode texte. Merci ! Olnnu (talk) 21:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Olnnu, si tu disposes déjà des cartes, c'est quelque chose que je peux faire, sinon, je te recommande de faire appel à Sémhur qui est un excellent wikicartographe. S'il n'est pas disponible pour le faire, il pourra t'orienter vers quelqu'un de compétent Clin. Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2015!

[edit]
* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)  [reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M0tty/archives_2013-2014&oldid=146580767"