User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores 12

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela do Hospital. Cangas. Galiza-38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot. --High Contrast 20:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:54, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comunicación entre as insuas de Gres. Vila de Cruces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:26, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariscando en Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 21:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virxe na igrexa parroquial de Gres. Vila de Cruces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Christian Ferrer 04:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral e parte traseira do Pazo de Raxoi. Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura no exterior da Aula de Cultura de Caixanova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need perspective correction --Nino Verde 08:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks, it was tilted and, therefore, needed perspective correction. Better now?--Lmbuga 21:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Ok now --Nino Verde 13:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overexpose on main boats. Check notes. --Nino Verde 08:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Done but with lightroom 4 it not was overexposed. Good now? Thanks for the review--Lmbuga 21:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Ok now. --Nino Verde 13:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo. --ArildV 21:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura en Cangas. Galiza. Galicia. 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura a F. Soage Villarino de Francisco Asorey en Cangas. 1925. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de benvida ao pelegrino en Padrón. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A tensión superficial da auga sobre unha rosa. Oroso. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful shot, but DOF too small. --Dirtsc 20:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Support I like this kind --Christian Ferrer 21:08, 01 July 2013 (UTC)

QI promotion

Hi, Lmbuga. Ithink you forgot to sign when you nominated this photo. I promoted it and received it this morning... but it's not mine ! So, I "give back to Caesar what is Caesar's":). Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 07:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A pementeira de Padrón (Galiza). Ramón Conde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks JLPC--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 08:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Turn any existing comments into bullet points

Sorry, but you are a bit overdramatizing. I have done this several times before, according to the rule (perhaps you have not read it on the QI page): Turn any existing comments into bullet points — add  Support and  Oppose if necessary. Best regards, --Ivar (talk) 06:45, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Guys, please calm down. I can understand that unconventional edit from iIfar got Miguel confused, but a revert should have been the solution for the problem.

Iifar, IMO you shouldn't change the status of nomination if nobody is asking for that (in this case moving it to CR). I don't know if you did it because you are very strict or formal with your own nominations. The step of changing comments to votes that you mention does only apply if a user does not agree with the promotion/decline and on his own goes for CR. So, in this case, it is a reviewer's choice to decide whether the status of the nomination should be changed.

Miguel, please, take back the claim in the admins noticeboard, and if you like I can mediate for you here, or somebody else if Iifar doesn't like the idea. Poco² 07:34, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Problem is imho already solved, because Miguel changed his comment to a neutral vote. A comment like not QI to me sounds very much like a  Oppose to me. That's why I added it. To avoid any misunderstanding in the future, I shall step aside from QI page. Best regards, --Ivar (talk) 09:07, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

I have not changed my comment: For me it's not a QI and I vote neutral, sorry: RESPECT--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 07:47, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

I don't wanted to vote, but I have been forced to do so because my words were changed by Iifar--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 07:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Withdrawn: I take back the claim as you've requested. I'm not the problem--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 08:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Guys, please, let's drop it, it is not worth it. You are two of the best users in QI, and actually in the project, and it would be a big loss for all of us if you refrain from contribuiting due to something like this. Take a break (like I did, by the way), if you like, but come back revitalize sooner, or later, everything else wouldn't just be reasonable. Misunderstandlings like this one just happen. Take care, Poco² 20:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura en Cangas. Galiza-73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 23:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela do Hospital en Cangas. Galiza-71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mar de Ons e VI-4-4887. Cangas. Galiza-65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Good quality --Iifar 10:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mar de Ons e VI-4-4887. Cangas. Galiza-64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vamps 11:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat in Cangas. Galiza-53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 15:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Cangas. Galiza-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Cangas. Galiza-49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:21, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:56 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unsure - composition feels a bit off on the left, I think it's the moped spoiling it. Mattbuck 22:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)  Done New version, but if you don't like it, no problem--Lmbuga 23:43, 2 July 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok for me --Christian Ferrer 05:25, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de benvida ao pelegrino en Padrón. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you do anything about the overexposure? Mattbuck 21:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC) I'll try tomorrow--Lmbuga 00:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC)  Done--Lmbuga 19:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok for me --Christian Ferrer 05:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura en Cangas. Galiza-70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --A.Savin 12:34, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanario da capela do Hospital en Cangas. Galiza-74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ás peixeiras. Cangas. Galiza-67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 18:00, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Prunella_vulgaris_-_harilik_käbihein.jpg

Your comments at QIC regarding the author of this picture were completely inappropriate. It's unfortunate if someone turned a comment into a vote, but that's what can happen at consensual review - people don't always add a little {{Comment}} tag and so we do the best we can. I would ask you to apologise to Iifar, as you have done them a complete disservice. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Are we talking about the same thing? I'll ask User:Poco a poco to translate my words. Impossible to say them in English. Start to write something. Wait you the answer.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 14:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Español:

No entiendo completamente sus palabras, pero si entiendo la primera oración y el espíritu de las mismas: ¿Estamos hablando de lo mismo?

La situación ha sido la siguiente: Yo reviso una imagen, pero no me convence plenamente. Pienso que no tengo motivos para oponerme, pero no es perfecta. Quiero transmitirlo, pero con las muchas dificultades que tengo para expresarme en inglés... me aguanto y posteriormente o anteriormente a que alguien promueva la imagen, me decido a comentar, aceptando la promoción o sin poner pegas a una posible futura promoción ({{comment}}). Comento, al menos dos veces (creo que tres), usando siempre {{comment}} y sin ánimo de cambiar el color verde ("promote") por el amarillo o rojo.

Pasados unos días, me encuentro con el hecho de que alguien ha votado por mí y que por ese motivo la imagen está en discusión. Me pregunto dos cosas: ¿Quien?, y ¿por que motivo?

Mientras lo pienso y lo busco, voy dándome cuenta de que mi indignación está más que justificada: No hay ningún país democrático en el que lo que se me ha hecho no sea delito, y es delito independientemente de la motivación o de la intención. No es justificable. Ninguna sociedad o comunidad democrática permite bajo ningún concepto la suplantación de identidades. En caso de que todo sea un error, lo que desde luego no se hace es lo que hace usted: llamar la atención al suplantado. Pero no es un error, es un hecho.

Dice usted que es normal o habitual. Habitual también es la violencia de género, el robo, la injusticia en todas sus formas. "Habitual, común o frecuente" son bonitas palabras para aceptar y no mejorar el mundo en que vivimos.

Pero yo le digo más: De habitual, nada: No es habitual que un usuario, teniendo su imagen promovida (en color verde), teniendo la opción de promoverla, transforme las palabras de otro, votando por el, para que su imagen torne en color amarillo y entre en discusión.

¿Me dice usted que eso pasa casi todos los días o habitualmente? Si dice tal cosa, le aseguro que no me lo podría decir mirándome a los ojos.

Piénselo usted un poco. Hay ahí alguna confusión posible? Puede haber alguna confusión posible cuando el usuario que vota por mí, tras yo quejarme amargamente, dice que él no ha cambiado nada y que... el no ha votado por mí, que solamente ha escrito "puntitos o algo así". Le recuerdo que no es necesario que haya intención en esos actos para que, en cualquier país democrático del mundo, un acto como ese sea delito grave (claro que yo no sé de donde es ese usuario, ni me interesa). El caso es que, en mi mundo, demostrado como está el hecho, estaría imputado.

Intención:

Es evidente que la foto a ese usuario no le importa. Está dispuesto a prescindir de ella con tal de que yo me calle. El problema no es la foto. El problema venía de una crítica recurrente que yo había hecho en las últimas tres o cuatro imágenes. Él no podía acallarme, no podía porque yo deseaba dialogar. Para callarme, necesitaba del apoyo de otros. Yo no tenía motivos, motivos objetivos, para oponerme y no me opuse porque mis motivos eran bastante subjetivos: "La foto puede ser mejor, tú las haces mejores, para mí no es QI". Molesto, decidió votar suplantándome, para así sentir el apoyo de la comunidad cuando su foto fuese aprobada y callarme definitivamente. Curiosamente yo nunca me he manifestado en contra de su foto.

Última y única pregunta refiriéndome a sus palabras: ¿Es normal o habitual que un usuario, sin dialogar absolutamente nada, decida votar en vez de otro, para declinar una imagen suya y así poner al otro contra las cuerdas, y así exponer al otro a las críticas de los demás (cuando en realidad piensa lo mismo que otros y solamente está comentando)?

(Ironía) Que el usuario que promueva una imagen, cambie un voto de otra persona y ponga la imagen en discusión el mismo gracias a ese voto que él ha realizado por otro, debe de ser, como usted dice, habitual: Ocurre, como usted dice, todos los días o, al menos, habitualmente: No me venga con cuentos. Respeto, derechos y democracia, por favor. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Sea como sea, para mi queja, da igual que haya o no haya intención, pero yo creo que la hay.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 16:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

English:

I am not really sure about what you wrote, but I do understand the first sentence and the spirit of your message: are we talking about the same matter?

The situation was the following: I review a picture, which does not convince me. Still, I think that I don't have enough arguments to decline it, but it is not perfect. I want to express my opinion, but due to my limitations with the English language, I wait up and keep the opinion for myself... later on, before the picture is promoted I add a comment while I accept that it is in its way to a promotion ({{comment}}). I comment the picture at least twice (or maybe 3 times), using always {{comment}} without any intention to change the green color ("promote") for a yellow or red one.

A few days later I figured out that somebody had voted for me and therefore the image is in the CR section. I wonder 2 things: who and why?

While I start to investigate it I start realizing that my indignation is more than justified: there is no democratic country where this action is not considered a crime, independently of the motivation or intention. There is no justification for that. No democratic society or community allows by any means the identity suppression. In the case that all this is a misunderstanding, what is for sure not correct is to call the attention to the person who has been suppressed. But it wsa not a misunderstanding, it is a fact.

You are saying that it is normal or usual. Usual is also the domeestic violence, the theft, the injustice in all its forms. "Usuaio, common or frequent" are nice words to accept and don't immprove the world in which we live.

But I tell you something else: By no means usual: it is not usual that a user, having a picture promoted (with green frame), with the possibility to get it promoted, changes the words of another user, voting for him, in order to get the picture yellow motivating a discussion.

Are you telling me that this is happening frequently? If you are suggesting that, I ensure you that you couldn't tell me that looking at my eyes.

Think about it. Is there room for confusion? It could be so if the user that voted for me, after my complain, affirms that he didn't change anything and...that he didn't vote for me, that he just wrote "period or something like that". I remind you that there is no necessity that it has been done intentionally to be considered a crime in any democtratic country in the world (of course I don't know where this user comes from, and I don't really care). Fact is that in my world, with a proven fact, he would be inculpated.

Intention:

It is evident that the user does not care much about the picture. He is willing to renounce it with the target that I shut up. The problems is not the picture. The problem was coming from my criticism from the last 3 or 4 pictures. He couldn't shut my mouth because I was willing to talk. To silence my voice he needed the help of others. I didn't have arguments, objective arguments to decline and I didn't do so because my arguments where pretty subjective : "The picture could be better, your pictures usually are, not a QI to me". Anoyed, he decided to supplant me with that vote, in order to feel the confirmation of the community when his picture was promoted and so silencing me for good. The funny part is that I have never voted against his pictures.

My last und unique question to your words: is it normal or usual that a user, without any previous dialogue, decides to vote for somebody else, in order to decline his own picture and so grill the other one, and expose him to other's criticism (although atually he thinks the same like the others and just limits to make a comment)?

(Irony) That a user changes the vote of another user moving the picture to discussion through a vote that he emitted suplanting somebody else for sure is something, as you say, normal: it happens, as you say, everyday, or at least very often: please, don't tell me a tale. Respect, rights and democracy, please. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC) (Text traslated by Poco² 20:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC))

Whatever it was, regading to my complain, it doesn't matter whether there was intention, but I believe there was .--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 16:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC) (Text traslated by Poco² 20:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC))

Insecto Bastavales Galicia 044b.jpg

Hi my friend. There is an identification error in this picture it is Syromastes rhombeus and it is a female. Good day. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Now it's in Syromastus rhombeus. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 17:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peirao en Cangas. Galiza-40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polución. Porto do Grove cunha gran mancha de gasoil na auga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 07:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/All files in Category:Joge Perianes

Tes moita razón. Graciñas. --. HombreDHojalata.^talk 19:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manuel Antonio por Ramón Conde. Rianxo. Galiza 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 01:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. Galiza 2013-Lmbuga-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 01:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. Galiza 2013-Lmbuga-Embarcación pesqueira.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 00:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013. Xosé María Brea Segade por Bert Gerresheim. Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though DOF is very tight --Smial 00:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Lata de Scweppes

Hola, ahi subi otra versión de la lata, abrazos!!! Ezarateesteban 22:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

En vez de subir otra versión, en mi opinión, podrías intentar hacer otra foto con un fondo más favorable; pero es mi opinión. Para ser una foto "de estudio" o con condiciones semejantes, la composición de la escena es mala... y continúa habiendo distorsión vertical por causa de la perspectiva--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Bueno lo intentare. Gracias!!!! Ezarateesteban 13:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Dankov_-_15_Tikhvin_Cathedral.jpg

Yesterday I've contributed new version. Please consider re-reviewing, thanks! --A.Savin 09:45, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done ok for me--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guindastre no porto de Rianxo. Galiza-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. Galiza-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 22:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busto de Castelao. José Escudero Couceiro. Rianxo. Galiza 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 20:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro da capela de San Bartolomeu. Porto de Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 20:22, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanario da capela de San Bartolomeu. Porto de Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muro da capela de San Bartolomeu. Porto de Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality photo -- George Chernilevsky 20:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rianxo. Galiza 2013-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Phb dt 7964 HTC.jpg

Hello Lmbuga! Thank you for the comments. I feared you would like "straight" verticals in the image. ;-) But it is a wide angle image from a high position, so I think it is OK to have perspective effects. Such images that have both horizontals and verticals straight look clearly unnatural to me. I prefer to set the horizontals straight, because the human vision tends to orientate at the real horizon when it is visible. --Dirtsc (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

I have promoted the image for that reason. My doubt here was whether it was possible, and better, a complete perspective correction. Good picture, no problem.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry and thanks for your picture--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:10, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't speak too much: It's very difficult to me to speak English--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

What Do you apologize for? ;-) English is neither your nor mine mothers language, but we are able to communicate in this language, what would otherwise not be possible. So everything is great. And as I pointed out during some review before: it's a review and I want honest opinions. If an image is not good enough, I can try better next time. Have a nice weekend, see you again in QI discussions! --Dirtsc (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rianxo. 2013. Galiza. España-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 09:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rianxo. 2013. Galiza. España-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 09:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. 2013. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Visión dous. 5ª VILL-4-1-96. Porto do Grove.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. Galiza-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiestras. A Ferradura. Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. Galiza-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and nice colors -- Alvesgaspar 22:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Alpirsbach-2492. Retouched.jpg

Hi Lmbuga,
I dont' know what you have done to the image - but IMO your version is much better than mine. Thank you very much for your efforts! I would be really grateful if you could tell me some day how you managed it :-)
Kind reagards from Lake Constance
Dietrich --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 20:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Letreiro con erro. Rianxo. 2013. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 21:46, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camiñando polo porto de Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:16, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acceso ó porto de Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Ajepbah 22:16, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013. Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 11:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rianxo. Galiza. Escultura a Manuela. Camilo Seira.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 11:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ás xentes do mar. Obra de Francisco Escudero deseñada por Issac Díaz Pardo. Rianxo. Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rúa X. Frieiro e A Romero. Autores da Rianxeira. Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento á xente do mar que o mar levou. Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good quality, but an appropriate geocode would be helpful (0,0 isn't an appropriate geocode...) --A.Savin 12:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)  Done approximate geolocation, and manual, but I think that it's good. Thanks--Lmbuga 15:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ás xentes do mar. Obra de Francisco Escudero deseñada por Issac Díaz Pardo. Rianxo. Galiza. F6.3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please decide for one photo. Every photo shows the object frome the very same perspective. QI has not the function to pre-select your images or is there a reason why all photos should become QI? --Tuxyso 21:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)  Done--Lmbuga 21:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Good quality. But the main motive could be better framed by the background by a slightly different perspective. I had stepped backwards a bit to match the stone from the foreground with the two gray areas in the background and the sculpture if people with the window. --Tuxyso 04:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balconada do pazo de Martelo na praza de Rafael Dieste de Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:36, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa museo de Manuel Antonio. Rianxo. Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pantocrátor. Igrexa de Santa Comba de Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 03:19, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013. Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp, perspektive ok, good quality. --Superbass 18:09, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

COM:QIC#July 27, 2013

For File:Rhodes Kremasti 06-13 Beach3.jpg, a new version is waiting for your re-review. Thanks --A.Savin 20:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for the warning--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Placas na casa museo de Manuel Antonio. Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but there is a problem with geolocalisation --Christian Ferrer 11:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)  Done, thanks--Lmbuga 19:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Good quality  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Hola

Hola, Miguel tendrá arreglo la tome dentro de una iglesia con espacio reducido, un abrazo!!!! --Ezarateesteban 22:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Muy difícil el arreglo, pero intentaré algo después de responderte. Te comento los problemas:

• La bandera de la derecha me parece irrecuperable porque está quemada, por lo que hay que recortarla y retirarla de la imagen.
• Pienso que la cara y la capa de la estatua tienen zonas quemadas por sobreexposición. Si están quemadas, no solamente sobreexpuestas, el color no se puede recuperar. Ya veremos, pero estoy seguro de que va a ser así.
• La distorsión es muy fuerte. Las líneas verticales deben ser rectas. La óptica de la imagen las distorsiona. Para evitar en lo posible esa distorsión, cuando hagas una foto, no inclines la cámara hacia abajo o hacia arriba. Con un programa se puede mejorar una distorsión media, pero tan fuerte es imposible. Es imposible porque la imagen, en este caso la imagen de la estatua, se estira y se sale de los límites de la foto. La distorsión es mayor con el gran angular y menor con el zoom.
• Hay graves aberraciones cromáticas. He colocado una nota en la imagen para que veas donde se perciben más. Son líneas que tienen un halo o lila, o verde, o amarillo, o rojo. Con Adobe lightroom se retiran pulsando un botón, pero hay que tener el archivo raw, si tienes el archivo jpg puede no funcionar.

Voy a intentar mejorar la imagen, pero conseguir que sea QI me parece imposible ya que no creo que sea corregible tanto defecto. Cuando tenga la versión, te envío otro aviso--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:55, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Por cierto, no todo son críticas a la imagen. Si decido trabajarla es porque la nitidez es buena.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:59, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Aquí tienes (File:LeonFedericoAneiros6-retocada.jpg) todo lo que yo soy capaz de hacer con esa imagen. Yo nunca la propondría a QI (hay zonas quemadas, el color no es naural...). Un saludo--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Gracias!!! Voy a tratar de ir a esa iglesia de vuelta, como me recomiendas tomarla?, es un area con poco espacio para colocar tripodes y con luz dificil Ezarateesteban 11:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Fíjate en la foto de User:Barcex. Tiene demasiado ruido, pero el color es aceptable. Su cámara es muy buena y tú no puedes subir el ISO tanto, pero quizás sí un poco, aunque después hay que retirar ese ruido con el ordenador.

Yo buscaría detalles de la estatua: Expresión faccial, manos, cara+manos, cuerpo entero... En esas fotos sí puedes usar un trípode y jugar con la velocidad sin cambiar el ISO. Sea como sea, la distorsión vertical va a existir, y puede ser grande porque te verás obligado a inclinar la cámara, tienes que buscar un programa que te permita enderezar las líneas. Yo te recomiendo Lightroom. Es un poco caro (130 euros), pero es bueno. Si lo consigues, te podría explicar el funcionamiento para que te iniciases.

Yo no creo que fuese capaz de hacer imágenes excepcionales habiendo esas condiciones ambientales.

Un saludo--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:35, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de Rianxo - Galiza-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de Rianxo - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Bob Collowân 09:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fonte na alameda de Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rúa en Rianxo. Galiza. 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful! Great quality. --High Contrast 17:50, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xogo popular. O Grove. Galiza -5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:40, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro barroco na praza de Rafael Dieste de Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rianxo. 2013. Galiza. España.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It would be better with geolocalisation, anyway QI for me  Support --Christian Ferrer 13:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)  Done --Lmbuga 16:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embarcación Brigantium. 3ªVILL-5-660. Cambados. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It would be better with geolocalisation, anyway QI for me  Support --Christian Ferrer 13:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)  Done --Lmbuga 16:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura no Grove de Maribel Mouriño P-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It would be better with geolocalisation, anyway QI for me  Support --Christian Ferrer 13:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)  Done --Lmbuga 16:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de Rafael Dieste. Rianxo. Galicia (Spain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro barroco na praza de Rafael Dieste de Rianxo. Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rúa de Rianxo. 2013. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homenaxe á muller mariscadora. Rianxo. Galicia (Spain)-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --A.Savin 10:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obras en Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments one dust spot --Rolf H. 06:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Lmbuga 16:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)  Support --Rolf H. 17:00, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de Rafael Dieste. Rianxo. Galicia (Spain)-2-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please remove the dust spots in the sky --Rolf H. 06:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks and sorry--Lmbuga 16:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)  Support --Rolf H. 17:00, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo do mar de Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments one dust spot --Rolf H. 06:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Lmbuga 16:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)  Support --Rolf H. 17:00, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosalía de Castro. Rianxo. Galiza-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento á xente do mar que o mar levou. Rianxo. Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Tuxyso 20:43, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela de San Bartolomeu. Rianxo. Galicia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! --NorbertNagel 21:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barco de xoguete. Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro en Laraño-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 15:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosalía de Castro. Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:25, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela de San Bartolomeu. Rianxo. Galicia-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rúa de Rianxo. 2013. Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 21:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanario da igrexa de Santa Comba de Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality --Christian Ferrer 17:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro barroco na praza de Rafael Dieste de Rianxo. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality --Christian Ferrer 17:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Portosín. Porto do Son. Galiza-Galicia-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but it looks a bit washed out. --QICbot (talk)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farola en Laraño.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:31, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro en Laraño-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me --Rjcastillo 03:08, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Oversaturation

I saw your comments about oversaturation on File:Neos Marmaras Bay 02.jpg and File:Neos Marmaras Bay 01.jpg. These comments are absolutely correct. The same issue is true for File:Kelyfos sunset boat 01.jpg and File:Kelyfos sunset.jpg which have been promoted already by other users. -- Smial (talk) 08:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi you two! Sorry for the interruption. ;-) Take a look at my question on Heuschreckes disk: User talk:Heuschrecke#Two images of greek islands on QIC --Dirtsc (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Above all, thank you both for talking to me. And thanks for the support here with your words. I'm going to see the images that say--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 09:10, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Portosín. Porto do Son. Galiza-Galicia-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualiy. --Tuxyso 06:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melibea 7ª-CO-2-2-03. Portosín.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 01:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Portosín. Porto do Son. Galiza-Galicia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. Galiza 2013-Lmbuga-Chalana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro Laraño Santiago Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:52, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta da igrexa de Santa Comba de Rianxo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although it would have been even better without a shadow. Heuschrecke 20:06, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio de Turismo e Xuventude do concello de Rianxo. Praza Castelao. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --Dirtsc 17:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Cam Paradise Reserve.jpg

Hi Lmbuga,

I've uploaded a new version of one of the images you declined at QIC. Can you have another look? Thanks, Heuschrecke (talk) 10:05, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Paris - Accordion Player - 0956.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris - Accordion Player - 0956.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 16:35, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice! --Moroder 20:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnela. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. Mattbuck 06:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnela. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-2b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 03:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnela. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. Mattbuck 06:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambados-2013-Embarcacións-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rianxo. Galicia-Galiza-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rianxo. Galicia-Galiza-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Super photograph! Clear pro! --High Contrast 19:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rianxo. Galicia-Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot! Good quality! --High Contrast 19:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rianxo. Galicia-Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 19:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinzas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Mattbuck 07:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guindastre do porto de Rianxo - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a very slight tilt of the horizon, but good crop and QI anyway. --JLPC 17:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorámica de Rianxo Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 05:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pescando en Portosín Porto do Son Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Guadalupe. Galiza-Galicia-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Guadalupe. Galiza-Galicia-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 08:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guindastre do porto de Rianxo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the two cables at left should be vertical. --Dirtsc 17:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Lmbuga 19:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Looks OK to me now. --Dirtsc 20:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conxunto de edificios estreitos. Rianxo. 2013. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, though a bit of CA in bottom right window. --Mattbuck 20:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Peace

Sometimes we do or say things in a rush and do not think about the influence or the consequences... That goes for me too. Ivar (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Rjcastillo 20:51, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality --Christian Ferrer 05:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality --Christian Ferrer 05:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 14:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 22:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aguiño. Ribeira. Galiza. 2013-30-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 11:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aguiño. Ribeira. Galiza. 2013-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 09:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is a bit too noisy, and there are some dustspots --A.Savin 21:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks. More than three dust spots were fixed. Blues are less dark... is that enough?--Lmbuga 19:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)  Support enough for QI --A.Savin 08:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Sky seems over-sharpend. Can you correct? --NorbertNagel 10:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Thank you. It was an oversight. I denoised the sky and there is a bit less noise in all the picture--Lmbuga 20:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Featured Picture.

Hello. I've sen you've promoted one of my photos to Feature Picture. I thank you immensely for this gesture. I consider it a deep honor. All the best. Jorge Royan

Nome de usuario

Boas, Miguel. Teño idea de que es administrador de Commons. Se é así quería comentar contigo un problema co meu nome de usuario aquí e en Galipedia, a ver se ten boa solución. Grazas. Pedro --P.Lameiro (talk) 00:48, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Non, creo lembrar que, cando deixei de ser burócrata na Galipedia, deixei de ser tamén burócrata en Commons.

Por certo, para cambios de nomes, tes que localizar un burócrata. A non ser que cambiasen as cousas, un administrador non ten competencia para cambiar nomes, non pode facer nada. Eu non estou en contacto con ningún actualmente, pero podo buscar a lista en que se relacionan os burócratas

Apertas e sinto non servir de maior axuda--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

En conclusión, non teño ningún cargo nin quero telo. Perdín miles de horas gratuitamente nese chollo para unicamente sentirme só--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:08, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Entón, se fose posible que me dixeras onde atopar a eses burócratas a quen dirixirme, agradeceríacho. Eu estiven buscando nas páxinas de portada, taberna, etc e non os din atopado. A cousa vai de saber se é posible que, agora que "Lameiro" parece xa non existir (é/era un brasileiro que podes coñecer nesta foto) (non existe user:lameiro pero si a súa páxina de conversa, cunha última edición en 2008), quería saber se eu podo ocupar o seu nome e así poder darme de alta na conta global como Lameiro que son. Mentres tanto, o problema que teño é que teño que editar na galipedia como Lameiro (a través de Explorer) e en Commons como P.Lameiro (e en Mozilla). E non será a primeira vez que abro a sesión de Commons en Explorer e logo resulta que estou editando na Galipedia como P. Lameiro. Logo vanme dicir que teño dúas contas na galipedia. Non sei se me explico. Bueno, se me dis como atopar eses contactos intentarei resolvelo. Como xa sabes, non teño idea de idiomas, polo que debería ser alguén con quen poder entenderme en galego ou en castelán. Moitas grazas e ata sempre. Pedro --P.Lameiro (talk) 19:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Onte estaba canso e deixei para hoxe darche máis información. Tras recorrer a min, penso que de nada che vale a lista de burócratas ou falar cun burócrata, pois dos oito que hai ningún fala español, galego ou portugués. Vouche ir respondendo pouco e pouco e explicándoche o que podes facer e o que eu entendo, pois paréceme que non vas poder conseguir o que pretendes xa que:

• non está permitido cambiar o teu nome usurpando o nome doutro usuario se este último ten edicións útiles. Ese usuario só ten unha edición, pero esa edición é unha captura de pantalla que subiu e que se está a usar en catro wikipedias.
• Por outra banda, se queres trocar o teu nome de usuario en Commons por outro, ou ben o novo nome de usuario non se emprega en ningunha wikipedia ou tes que demostrar que es ti a persoa que detenta eses usuarios das wikipedias en que estea presente ese nome.

En conclusión

Entendo que non vas poder facer o que queres, pero podes facer outra cousa: Cambiar as dúas contas a un novo nome. Ollo: Cambia primeiro a de Commons. Eu propóñoche que a cambies a un nome que ninguén empregue, por exemplo PdrLameiro ou "Pedro-Lameiro". Na conta global podes comprobar se os nomes están en desuso (non lembro onde, pero podo buscarcho)

Se te decides a facelo así, dimo e axúdoche co procedemento para cambiar o nome. A páxina para solicitar o cambio de nome é esta Commons:Changing username (non a leas en español ou en galego, acabo de observar que está incompleto o apartado sobre cómo proceder para solicitar o cambio e, se non fas ben o procedemento, non se fai o cambio).

Sinceramente, polo que explicas, creo que che vai compensar facer o que che digo, especialmente se

· despois de cambiar o nome, creas, pois desaparece, o usuario co nome vello,

· redireccionas a páxina de usuario e de discusión do usuario vello á do usuario novo,

· cambias a sinatura do usuario novo para que sexa igual á do usuario vello.

Espero que che sirva, non se me ocorre outra cousa. Apertas--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 08:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Acabo de darme conta de que hai outra pequena dificultade, pero salvable. Non actúes sen falar comigo, por favor--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 08:26, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Case que me tenta deixalo estar e non complicarme nin complicarte a vida, pero a verdade é que debo insistir, a ver se resolvo o ¿problema? dunha vez por todas. Pero seguindo o teu razonamento, se non podo chamarme Lameiro en Commons, ocórreseme que sería todo máis sinxelo cambiar o nome de usuario na Galipedia polo de P. Lameiro, e asunto resolto ¿non? Así sería o mesmo en todas partes e evitamos a complicación do cambio en Commons, que semella máis complicada. Total, a min dáme o mesmo chamarme unha cousa ou outra. Quédanme dúas dúbidas: a primeira é que se dis que Commons "esixe" que un nome de usuario non estea ocupado noutras wikipedias, ¿por que eu puiden rexistrarme -na galipedia- cun nome xa "rexistrado"? Quizais sexa que esa cautela se dea desde Commons ás outras wikis e non desde as outras a Commons. Segunda, ¿todo o meu historial na Galipedia desaparecerá ó desaparecer Lameiro ou se trasladará co cambio de nome a P. Lameiro? Supoño que isto xa está previsto e que non terei que empezar de cero. Bueno, dime se esta miña proposta facilitaría as cousas. E grazas polo teu tempo e a túa preocupación. Saúdos, Pedro --P.Lameiro (talk) 20:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Pois tes razón, non se me ocorrera, se pasas o teu nome a P.Lameiro na Galipedia acábase o problema. Espero que non haxa en ningunha wikipedia un P.Lameiro, pois non poderías ter unha conta global. Para facelo, eu diríache que falases con Alberte. Se tes algún problema, coméntamo pois eu podo ser testemuña de que ti detentas esas dúas contas, pero non creo que teñas problema pois con poñer na páxina de usuario que solicitas o cambio demostras que es ti.

Non perdes nada. Non perdes ningunha edición. Todas as edicións do usuario anterior pasan a ser edicións do novo usuario. En wikimedia o historial é sagrado, por iso tantos problemas para cambiar de nome. Non me gusta dicilo, pero ás veces a burocracia o que fai é respectar os nosos dereitos e a nosa identidade.

Se o fas e necesitas axuda para cambiar a sinatura ou calquera outra cousa, aquí estou. O único certo é que non podes seguir editando estando incómodo por un motivo tan absurdo.

Se non podes facer o que dis, volve contactar comigo e intentamos o que che propuxen--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Non che podo responder con seguridade ás outras dúbidas que tes. Estimo que a aparición da conta global é posterior a seres ti usuario, xa que o da conta global é relativamente novo. Eu tiven sorte co meu nome, pero tiven que demostrar que detentaba 8 ou 12 contas en diferentes wikipedias. Debería ocorrer que actualmente ninguén se puidese rexistrar en ningunha wikipedia co nome "Lameiro", pero algo me di que non é así, é só unha intuición motivada pola independencia das wikipedias. Para poderes estar tranquilo necesitas unha conta global. Fala con Alberte e, se el non che dá unha solución completa (espero que si o faga), fala comigo, veremos o que podemos facer.

Non hai dúbida de que esta túa nova proposta facilita as cousas: Vas solicitar axuda para estar cómodo a un compañeiro burócrata e na túa lingua. Simplificar máis é imposible. Boa idea--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:39, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa en Canillo. Andorra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 16:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Joan de Caselles-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Joan de Caselles-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 23:01, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Escultura en Canillo.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura en Canillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Joan de Caselles-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Tamaño das imaxes

Boas, Miguel. [Non me expico por que esta mensaxe se escribe nun tamaño de letra moito maior có habitual, mentres que o resto dos caracteres da páxina son de tamaño normal] Sempre crin que as miñas imaxes, ultimamente, tiñan tamaños superiores con creces a 1200x1600. Polo que vin nas feitas mais recentemente, son de 2056x3088 (que supoño que serán equivalentes a 6 megapixeles e pico). De todas formas, teño fotografías feitas coa cámara anterior que aínda subo agora, e esas si que eran máis pequenas. E logo están as recortadas para quedarme co motivo que me interesa, que efectivamente poden ser pequenas. Terei máis en conta o que me dis dos tamaños no futuro pero o importante é que algunha delas che parteza merecedora de Calidade. Esas cousas alimentan o ego e son de agradecer, por máis que me repita a min mesmo que, a estas alturas da miña vida, non me importen xa os recoñecementos. Canto ó do nome de usuario, sigo dándolle voltas na cabeza. Saúdos e ata sempre. Pedro --P.Lameiro (talk) 19:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

• Claro que, comparado co tamaño das túas imaxes de calidade... nin punto de comparación. Nas próximas cambiarei o selector da cámara. Grazas, Pedro --P.Lameiro (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagoa de Vixán. Ribeira. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Valira de Canillo. Canillo. Andorra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanario da capela de Santa Creu en Canillo. Andorra-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canillo. Andorra 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura a Carlemany en Canillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embarcacións. Portosín. Porto do Son.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Serni de Canillo. Andorra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Serni de Canillo. Andorra-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:38, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Serni de Canillo. Andorra-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:38, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa e camioneta en Canillo. Andorra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entre Coll d'Ordino e Canillo. Andorra 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entre Coll d'Ordino e Canillo. Andorra 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition.--ArildV 10:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino e estrada a La Massana. Andorra 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 11:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista subindo a Coll d'Ordino. Andorra 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Serní de Canillo. Andorra -7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Serní de Canillo. Andorra -5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 10:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Accedendo a Sant Serní de Canillo. Andorra 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canillo. Andorra 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Serní de Canillo. Andorra 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Joan de Caselles-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit blurry in the top corners but in the other hand, details in the shadows -> OK to me. --Myrabella 09:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galiza is not Spain. Santiago de Compostela. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 08:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 71.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 72.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escudo de Escaldes Engordany na praza de Lalín. Andorra 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro na praza de Lalín. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura na praza de Lalín. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Valira. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:45, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura ante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 56.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura ante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 62.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza-34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Martí de La Cortinada. Andorra 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Martí de La Cortinada. Andorra 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entre Coll d'Ordino e Canillo. Andorra 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista subindo a Coll d'Ordino. Andorra 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 4 dustspots (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 18:03, 9 September 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks--Lmbuga 19:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:10, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Image resizing

Hi! There are two reasons for resizing. First is simple: If images must be perspective corrected there is always a loss in real resolution. This leads to unsharpness in those areas of the image, that were "stretched", mostly in the upper half of the picture. With careful resizing this can be compensated.
The second reason is more complicated to explain. In the past several images with high resolution were declined at QIC because of minimal unsharpness. This is esp. true for some photos from cameras like the Nikon D800 or some minimal blurred shots of people (sports, portraits, stage photography). My opinion is: A high resolution image with slight unsharpness is better than a scaled down version of the same image that "looks" perfectly sharp. But in those QIC discussions other people said: "No, this is not perfecly sharp, it must be declined! Please upload a scaled down version with better sharpness, this can be QI!". So my opinion is obviously wrong and the conclusion is: "Scale it down to hide slight unsharpness from those jurors.". -- Smial (talk) 09:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I understand and I agree with what you say, you're right.

I think it's recommended -I'm telling you as a friend- that the size of the images were always different (3019x... pixels, 3125x... pixels, not 3000x... pixels always), because, that way, size does not seem to infringe the "rule" of not resize images. Greetings--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 12:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I have chosen 3000px for the longer edge of the images because in most cases the resulting size will be 6 MPixels or more. That is far above the 2 MPixel minimum requirement of QIC and I believe, this is a good compromise. Choosing always different sizes would be extremely unhandy, because this is the last step in image processing by me and I do that per automatic batch processing. The problem with that "rule" not to resize is: Other contributors demand the opposite.... -- Smial (talk) 14:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Now, with the aid of your words, I am opposed to this rule also. I think it is not necessary: The rule causes more harm than good. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 14:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Forno no Pazo do Allo en Zas (Coruña).jpg

File:Forno no Pazo do Allo en Zas (Coruña).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

It's not a coyvio, there were only a problem with the metadata. It could have been solved. Dismal performance and abusive--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:42, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igrexa de Sant Serní de Llorts. Ordino. Andorra 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door of the church of Sant Serní de Llorts. Ordino. Andorra 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virxe no exterior da igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Martir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral e parte traseira do Pazo de Raxoi. Santiago de Compostela. Galiza 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza-35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:28, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Pregunta

Hola Miguel, no estoy seguro si hay algo así. En la wiki en inglés si que tienen una página para ese propósito, pero lo único que se me ocurre a vote pronto es esto: COM:AN/U. Si encuentro alguna otra cosa, te aviso. Saludos, Poco² 21:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, no he contestado a todos tus mensajes más que nada porque pensé que en ese momento de calentura era mejor no contestar. Espero que las cosas se hayan calmado y que "pases" del asunto. Un abrazo, Poco² 08:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

No tenías que contestar, no esperaba mayor contestación. A veces, necesitas un amigo para comentar lo que pasa, no para que te conteste. Gracias por estar ahí--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 04:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Original handrails and fountain. Escaldes. Andorra 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 103.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 04:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 04:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Valira. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Building of Caldea Spa (detail). Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 96.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of Caldea Spa (detail). Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 96.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buildings in Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Torre de Caldea. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 93.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Caldea. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiestra da igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Martir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiestras da igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Martir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 73.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plantación de tabaco. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotonda en Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Geocoding would be very useful with such street photos. --Smial 07:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Llorts. Ordino. Andorra 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better --Poco a poco 21:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre da igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Martir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muro lateral da igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Martir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Torre do balneario Caldea. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 42.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre do balneario Caldea. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Forno no Pazo do Allo en Zas (Coruña).jpg

Hola Lmbuga, hace unos días Stromare me pidió si podía ayudar con el tema de la imagen borrada, pero no he visto su mensaje hasta hoy, y no sé si llego muy tarde. También he leído la conversación que mantuviste con Poco a Poco. Sin haber visto todavía la fotografía, creo entender que lo que te faltó fue indicar claramente que no eras el autor de la obra original, sino el autor de la obra derivada, y al dejar de atribuir al autor original sí que se viola una licencia CC. En cualquier caso, las formas en que se te trató borrando directamente la imagen no fueron desde luego las mejores, lamento que te llevaras un disgusto. Para la próxima vez que subas una imagen derivada intenta al menos indicar claramente en el apartado de autoría tanto al autor original como al autor (o autores) de las modificaciones posteriores. No quiero tocar nada para no meterme por medio en todo esto sin haberlo pedido nadie de los implicados, pero si necesitas algo estaré por aquí, un saludo. Lobo (howl?) 08:48, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Muchas gracias.

No es exactamente lo que dices. La imagen era derivada y procedente de Flickr, y Cc-by-2.0. Yo atribuí al autor perfectamente la imagen en los datos de la misma. El problema es que el programa Lightroom con el que trabajo las fotos, por defecto, incorpora mi nombre en los metadatos y coloca "todos los derechos reservados". El problema estaba en los metadatos, no en los datos de la foto.

Si se me hubiese comunicado antes de borrarla, pues ya había borrado la foto de mi ordenador, habría hecho una copia y la habría, tras solucionar el problema de los metadatos, subido con otro nombre. De esa manera yo mismo solicitaría el borrado de la primera imagen por ser duplicada y con metadatos conflictivos o erróneos.

Sea como sea, si los datos de la imagen son correctos, lo de los metadatos es cuestionable que sea copyvio, especialmente si la licencia Cc no es "sa" (compartir igual). Yo subo mis imágenes poniendo en los metadatos "todos los derechos reservados" y es despues de verlas así cuando decido compartirlas con Cc-by-sa-3.0.

Hacer lo que hago me permite asegurar que si no se cumple la licencia de los datos, la imagen no se puede usar. Quizás la use una primera persona sin atribuírla correctamente, pero una segunda persona va a ver que tiene todos los derechos reservados.

La verdad, estoy en total desacuerdo. Si recordase en su momento la página para abusos de admnistradores, lo habría denunciado. Siempre tuve en estima el trabajo de Túrelio, creo que ya estaba activo cuando yo era burócrata en Commons. Y no entiendo que un administrador con experiencia menosprecie a un usuario que podría tener en el conjunto de Wikimedia más ediciones que él.

No pienso volver a trabajar la imagen, una imagen que estaba en uso en una votación a imagen de la semana en la Wikipedia gallega. Y es que las cosas que se hacen aquí tienen repercusiones en otros sitios y en la imagen que tienes en otros sitios.

En gallego, para decir que no se quiere saber más del tema se dice "morra o conto" (muera el cuento). Pues "morra o conto", pero muchas gracias.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:59, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

La verdad es que se borren fotos, mediante el sistema de borrado rápido, que yo haya subido después del 2006 (año en el que creo que ya era administrador aquí) me produce vergüenza--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 12:23, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Nada, a mandar. Nos conocemos de una vida anterior en la que yo también fui administrador :-) --Stromare (talk) 19:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa do concello do Grove. Galiza 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:07, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relevo da fachada da igrexa de Castiñeiriño. Santiago de Compostela-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 17:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura ao pelegrino. Padrón. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 17:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fonte con escultura de peixe en Padrón. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support cool --A.Savin 16:19, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 16:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro. Praza de Lalín. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 13:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oliveira. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 101.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture of Mn. Jacint Verdaguer. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Azulexos das paredes da Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Please re-review

Hi Lmbuga! Could you take another look on Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#September_24.2C_2013 - I've uploaded a new version. Thanks. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Good work. Nice image--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:40, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I like this image too. It is somehow very minimalistic. --Tuxyso (talk) 00:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Alternative version FPC

Hi Lmbuga! I've uploaded an alternative of my FPC, see. Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panoramic Overview from Glacier Point over Yosemite Valley 2013.jpg because the previous one had some perspective issues. I would be glad if you would also the new (improved) version. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Done It's better--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 16:24, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat in Cangas. Galiza-54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. Galiza 2013-Chalana-Lmbuga-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Image du jour

Parabéns para a imaxe do día na Francia do Wikipedia --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peza de central hidroeléctrica. Andorra 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality! --NorbertNagel 19:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa do Concello do Grove. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura no acceso á Casa do Concello do Grove. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:08, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xogo popular. O Grove. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque do Restollal. Galiza. 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza. 2013-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:41, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. Galiza-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 12:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro da capela de San Bartolomeu. Porto de Rianxo. Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit dark around the head of the statue but still QI imo. --P e z i 13:55, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiestra da praza de abastos de Cangas. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:05, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela do Hospital. Cangas. Galiza-39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me but I'd suggest crop (foreground) --P e z i 00:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paseo de Les Pardines. Encamp. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista desde o paseo de Les Pardines. Encamp. Andorra 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 19:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Escultura en Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 135.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura en Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rúa peonil en Andorra 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:46, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Homenatge a l'immigrant. Antonio Tenreiro. Andorra 134.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homenatge a l'immigrant. Antonio Tenreiro. Andorra 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:06, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Sant Esteve. Andorra 129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura en Andorra 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 13:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 127.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 13:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 126.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013. Cidade da Cultura. Santiago de Compostela - Galiza-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 13:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busto de Castelao. José Escudero Couceiro. Rianxo. Galiza 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 16:22, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013. Xosé María Brea Segade por Bert Gerresheim. Rianxo. Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 16:22, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:7º centenary de la signatura dels Pareatges. Andorra 146.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7º centenary de la signatura dels Pareatges. Andorra 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centenari de La Nova Reforma. Casa de La Vall. Andorra 145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fonte. Andorra 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia de Peralta. O Grove. Galiza-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 18:18, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your note on File:Panoramic Overview from Glacier Point over Yosemite Valley 2013 Alternative.jpg

Let me first say that it is imho no good style to add an image note to a foreign image without further clarification or information on the talk page (notably if it is neither on QIC or FPC). I cannot really see your point from the brief comment Strange clear area IMO. I would appreciate if you clarify your problem with the photo. You find the original single-shot photo (the part where you added the note) under [1]. I see no difference between the original photo and the part (despite color and noise adjustments) where you added the note to on the stitching. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:19, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

(Poor English, automatic translator) I'm not sure I understand you fully. I had to use the automatic translator of google. Sorry, I've only seen a small clear area, strange IMO. I have not even clear that this is a defect.

It saddens me to have committed a lack of style or education: I just wanted to be helpful. Because I believe that, for the quality of the image, this will be proposed in FP, I said what I said. I've said in order to make the image promoted in FP (=I've said to enable the image to be FP).

My difficulty with English forces me to express myself with notes. Do not be obtuse and understand then please--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem with difficulties in English. But please compare the link to the original file on the Dropbox with the complete panorama. Do you still see the problem? I think both look the same. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Now I understand better your words. I don't see the clear area in Dropbox, but the image of Dropbox is in my opinion too much clear. Sorry, I see a little clear area, but it's not important.

Next time I will not say anything. Sorry--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:51, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

The image had seemed so good (to me or for me) that I came to say this tiny detail--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

It is only a communication problem. I encourage you to say something! That's good! Have you downloaded the fullsize image from the dropbox (not only the preview)? I don't understand what you mean with "clear area". Do you mean "clarity" in Lightroom? Probably you can ask a French speaking person for help and translation to formulate your problem in English. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok, no problem. Thanks.

Images do not have the same exposure IMO. I downloaded the image. I don't see the tiny problem in dropbox. Sorry. I deleted the note and strikethrough text in the proposal. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

I only can speak and understand perfectly galician language, spanish and portugal language. User:Poco a Poco can aids me--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de la Vall. 1580. Andorra 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Edificio do goberno de Andorra 147.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio do goberno de Andorra 147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escudo de 1530. Casa de la Vall. Andorra 150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia de Peralta. O Grove. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Schmausenschloss (Mogeldorf).jpg

Dear colleague!

Concerning your criticism of my file :Schmausenschloss.jpg I can tell the following: 1 . Architectural details from sandstone are exposed over the years to aeration that clearly is visible in a picture. 2 . The walls of this building deviate a vertical that is visible on a tower wall on the top floor. 3 . Spots on a wall of a tower are apparently result of different composition of plaster. 4 . My lens, really, possesses a considerable CA. Therefore I hate to shot naked branches.

But c'est la vie. Alas!

I thank you for attention.--Витольд Муратов (обс, вклад) 10:20, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Moved the proposal for discussion. Delete the text and the note about of the spot--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

sculptures in Andorra

Hi, this discussion Commons:La_taverna#Fotografies_d.27art_p.C3.BAblic_a_Andorra might interest you, as it concerns several of your uploads. (Background: Andorra has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright.) --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok. There were so many sculptures in Commons of sculptures in ANdorra that I thought I had freedom of panorama. Delete the ones that you see fit (all if you want). I can not speak to the authors. Thanks --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem if you use speedy deletion--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

It is not necessary to inform the deletion of each picture to me. Thanks and sorry--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:04, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

I can make a list of the photos uploaded in order to facilitate the deletion--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:19, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

As you might see from the above linked thread on La_taverna, in this case — as initiated by Jordiferrer — we will try to get permission from the sculptors, instead of simply deleting them. Of course, this requires to know who is the sculptor. It does not require that the photographer himself contacts the artists. So, you should take a look at section "b) Images of likely modern sculptures for which so far no sculptor name was provided" whether it contains files from you and try to identify the sculptor. --Túrelio (talk) 05:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Images from you, with missing sculptor-information are:

• File:Escultura en Canillo.jpg
• File:Escultura en Canillo-2.jpg
• File:Escultura en Andorra 132.jpg

--Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

I've been trying to locate the sculptors. I've only found the sculptors of three sculptures. I can not find the sculptors of these three and other sculptors. You can delete them. Sorry.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

O.k., I've added that information to the thread. May be somebody else has success. --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

copyrighted sculpture

Hi, when uploading images of still copyrighted sculptures, such as File:Praia de Peralta. O Grove. Galiza-6.jpg, always add the appropriate FOP-template to warn re-users about possible restrictions for use. --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks. I already knew that, but I forget it too often--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:05, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanela da Casa de la Vall. Andorra 162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Príncep Benlloch. Andorra 165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments little CA at the top of the sceptre --Christian Ferrer 19:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)  Done New version, but CAs correction was activated in Lightroom. I tried to correct the problem as halos. Better now?--Lmbuga 21:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura e fonte. Andorra 167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 170.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:31, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 169.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 18:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiestras na Casa de la Vall. Andorra 159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relevo e escudo. Casa de la Vall. Andorra 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura inaugurada tras a sinatura da Constitución de Andorra 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 07:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I can't. I can not recognize the streets on the map. I've been to Andorra only ten days. I think that the sculpture is between Andorra la Vella and Escaldes-Engordany, but surprisingly, no boundary (or borders) between one city and another--Lmbuga 18:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Sorry, mistake, the sculpture is in Andorra la Vella--Lmbuga 18:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura inaugurada tras a sinatura da Constitución de Andorra 153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 07:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura inaugurada tras a sinatura da Constitución de Andorra 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Casa de la Vall. Andorra 155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Casa de la Vall. Andorra 156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montañas en Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montañas en Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains in Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanela da Casa de la Vall. Andorra 162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Príncep Benlloch. Andorra 165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments little CA at the top of the sceptre --Christian Ferrer 19:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)  Done New version, but CAs correction was activated in Lightroom. I tried to correct the problem as halos. Better now?--Lmbuga 21:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura e fonte. Andorra 167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 170.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:31, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 169.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 18:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiestras na Casa de la Vall. Andorra 159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relevo e escudo. Casa de la Vall. Andorra 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura inaugurada tras a sinatura da Constitución de Andorra 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 07:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I can't. I can not recognize the streets on the map. I've been to Andorra only ten days. I think that the sculpture is between Andorra la Vella and Escaldes-Engordany, but surprisingly, no boundary (or borders) between one city and another--Lmbuga 18:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Sorry, mistake, the sculpture is in Andorra la Vella--Lmbuga 18:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura inaugurada tras a sinatura da Constitución de Andorra 153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 07:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura inaugurada tras a sinatura da Constitución de Andorra 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Casa de la Vall. Andorra 155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Casa de la Vall. Andorra 156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 18:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 13:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura a F. Soage Villarino de Francisco Asorey en Cangas. 1925. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rúa en Ordino. Andorra 190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relevo da fachada da igrexa de Castiñeiriño. Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lonxa de Cangas. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:45, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruceiro da capela de San Bartolomeu. Porto de Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montañas en Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia en Baroña ao sur da praia nudista de Baroña. Galiza 302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! O curuto do Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 22:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013. Xosé María Brea Segade por Bert Gerresheim. Rianxo. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Towers of stones in the hill fort of Baroña Hi Lmbuga, these "towers of stones" are cairns. For more cairns in Spain see Category:Cairns in Spain. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 11:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.  Done Category:Cairns in the hill fort of Baroña--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:30, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apilamentos de pedras realizado polos visitantes ao Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apilamentos de pedras realizado polos visitantes ao Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:02, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apilamentos de pedras realizado polos visitantes ao Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Agreed, however I would like to see geocoding. --Kreuzschnabel 16:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apilamentos de pedras realizado polos visitantes ao Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:35, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Agreed, however I would like to see geocoding. --Kreuzschnabel 16:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apilamento de pedras realizado polos visitantes ao Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:23, 20 October 2013 (UTC) Agreed, however I would like to see geocoding. --Kreuzschnabel 16:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apilamento de pedras realizado polos visitantes ao Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:35, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Agreed, however I would like to see geocoding. --Kreuzschnabel 16:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Percebeira nas augas de Baroña. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A geotag would be appreciated. --Cayambe 08:55, 18 October 2013 (UTC)  Done--Lmbuga 19:46, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI

Dear Lmbuga! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos time to time accumulates on this page... --Bff (talk) 10:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I've been categorizing some images--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 16:47, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro de Baroña. Camiño de acceso visto no sentido contrario. Porto do Son. Galiza 326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia nudista de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:21, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detalle do muro do Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son. Galiza 307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Kal David (Lindenbrauerei Unna) IMGP1216 smial wp.jpg

Hi! You should not have striked out your critics. My comment was not meant offensive. I really did not understand "artifacts" alone. I could not find something special in the marked area except of the rather strong noise and noise reducing artifacts, but this noise is everywhere in the image. Is it the green shadow? -- Smial (talk) 18:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Ps: It is completely ok to decline the image because of noise, the lighting situation was really bad. I'm happy enough I was able to provide the first and until now only image of Kal in the wikipedia world ;-)

The area of the note was only an example of what was happening in the picture. If you want to understand, it is understood, you understood. Noise?, artifacts?... I don't know, but bad quality. I only can say here (not there) bad quality--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:14, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm sick of meeting you, sorry--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate you do not move threads to my personal talk page. If you disagree: "Discuss"--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:21, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

What did I do wrong? You wrote "artifacts". And I asked "I don't understand. What kind of artifacts?". This was not meant offensive. -- Smial (talk) 20:33, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

...--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, me paso por aquí porque Smial comenta aquí (en alemán) que su intención no fue en ningún caso ofenderte y que él no está seguro del problema que comentaste en su foto. Dice que la foto en sí es bastante ruidosa y no sabe si al hablar de artefactos te refieres a algún área en concreto. Smial comenta también que son las barreras idiomáticas las que os están jugando una mala pasada. Saludos, Poco² 21:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

A propósito, si puedo expresar mi opinión sobre la imagen: no es QI por varias razones, la silueta, el ruido, falta de enfoque y la zona que marcaste, Miguel, es de escasa calidad como el resto. Creo que eso puede que sea lo que confundió a Smial.

Übrigens, wenn ich meine Meinung zum Bild äußern kann: für mich ist es kein QI aus mehreren Gründen, die Silhouette wirkt unnatürlich, es ist zum Teil unscharf and der ausgewählte Bereich hat so viel Rauschen wie der Rest. Das ist vielleicht der Grund, dass Smial verwirrt hat. Poco² 21:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem, Smial (and Poco). It's only a image. I'd rather have good relationship with you to be right. Sorry. Anyway, I consider abusive the fact to moving these issues to the personal talk pages: The scope of discussion is set, and it's QI candidates--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 00:56, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, thank you for clarification on QIC and thanks to Poco for mediation and translation. -- Smial (talk) 09:55, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangas. Galiza-57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:00, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Do concello ás peixeiras. Cangas. Galiza-66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:00, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia das Furnas no devalo. Porto do Son. Galiza 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia das Furnas con marea baixa. Porto do Son. Galiza 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia do río Sieira no devalo. Porto do Son. Galiza 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A volta do mar. Xoán Piñeiro Nogueira. Cangas - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:07, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embarcación Arroios. Cangas. Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 11:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto. Cangas. Galiza-62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veleiro e outros. Cangas. Galiza-63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe better with a little less NR but very nice --Christian Ferrer 17:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks--Lmbuga 18:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carrer Major. Ordino. Andorra 212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia do río Sieira no devalo. Porto do Son. Galiza 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 06:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia das Furnas no devalo. Porto do Son. Galiza 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 06:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tellados de Ordino. Andorra 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia do río Sieira con marea baixa. Porto do Son. Galiza 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia das Furnas. Porto do Son. Galiza 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino and bell tower of Saint Corneli and Saint Cebrià. Andorra 222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte sobre o río Valira. Andorra 172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Corneli i Sant Cebrià d'Ordino. Andorra 208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though it would have been nice to see the stained glass window completely. --Smial 11:23, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Thanks. I'm agree with you, Smial. I do not remember the cause of that perspective. Chances are that people were praying and I did not want to annoy them--Lmbuga 12:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building in Ordino. Andorra 215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building in Ordino. Andorra 216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buildings in Ordino. Andorra 214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:16, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Ordino. Andorra 220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino and bell tower of Saint Corneli and Saint Cebrià. Andorra 221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:16, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosalía de Castro. Rianxo. Galiza-Lmbuga-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you paint out the wire? Mattbuck 21:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC) You're right, thanks  Done--Lmbuga 19:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 19:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains in Ordino. Andorra 224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains in Ordino. Andorra 225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains in Ordino. Andorra 226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Tu revista en QIC

Hola Miguel,
Gracias por tu revista de la imagen que he propuesto en QIC, File:Corse_tour_genoise_Capu_di_Muru.jpg. Tu crítica es la oportunidad para mi de usar mi español (¡muy oxidado, discúlpame!) Esta torre tiene varios siglos pero no fue bien mantenida. Está situada en una punta marítima, y sus piedras ahora son erosionadas por el viento y la sal. Pero si se examina la escalera de hierro en el lado de la torre, se verá que esta nítido en la foto, incluidos los cables metálicos. Saludos, saúdos --Myrabella (talk) 14:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Nueva revisión. Tu español me parece perfecto.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in La Seu d'Urgell. Catalonia C13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal of the Cathedral of La Seu d'Urgell. Catalonia C12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief. Carthedral of La Seu d'Urgell. Catalonia C14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balcón. La Seu d'Urgell. Cataluña C06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamo. Naturlandia. Sant Julià de Lòira. Andorra 234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:44, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino. Andorra 230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. There could be "more image" at the bottom :-) --NorbertNagel 11:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment You're right, but the bottom of the image was out of focus (I don't know why it's out of focus. Perhaps a problem with the objective)--Lmbuga 19:10, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant Corneli i Sant Cebrià d'Ordino. Andorra 202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains in Ordino. Andorra 228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains in Ordino. Andorra 227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ordino and bell tower of Saint Corneli and Saint Cebrià. Andorra 223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oso. Naturlandia. Sant Julià de Lòira. Andorra 239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oso. Naturlandia. Sant Julià de Lòira. Andorra 238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamo. Naturlandia. Sant Julià de Lòira. Andorra 237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 126.jpg

File:Escultura de Salvador Dalí. Andorra 126.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dama dama. Naturlandia. Sant Julià de Lòria. Andorra 255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dama dama (femia). Naturlandia. Sant Julià de Lòira. Andorra 240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturlandia. Sant Julià de Lòria. Andorra 260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Cccefalon 11:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estanque. Naturlandia. Sant Julià de Lòria. Andorra 256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus mugo. Les Pardines. Andorra 250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Pardines. Encamp. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igrexa de Santo Agostiño de Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadow is slightly disturbing, otherwise very good technical quality and clearly QI imo.--ArildV 19:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabalo no alto da Coma. Andorra 293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabalo no alto da Coma. Andorra 282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabalos no alto da Coma. Andorra 292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabalo no alto da Coma. Andorra 294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:07, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabalo no alto da Coma. Andorra 284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Construción tradicional no alto da Coma. Andorra 290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 08:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa tradicional no alto da Coma. Andorra 288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa tradicional no alto da Coma. Andorra 287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 08:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa tradicional no alto da Coma. Andorra 285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa tradicional no alto da Coma. Andorra 296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --P e z i 23:53, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa tradicional no alto da Coma. Andorra 297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. The girl in the window and the camera is slightly disturbing.--ArildV 08:42, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabalo no alto da Coma. Andorra 295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013. Església romànica de Sant Miquel d'Engolasters. Andorra 304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --ArildV 08:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escudo de armas da capela do Hospital en Cangas. Galiza-68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura de Manuel Rodríguez no Grove. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escultura en Cangas. Galiza-69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto de Rianxo. Galiza-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 00:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peirao en Cangas. Galiza-41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Perhaps some crop at the bottom would enhance the composition, but not really necessary. --Smial 21:32, 19 December 2013 (UTC)