User talk:Kani
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:29, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Kongreslibro2013.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
BrightRaven (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
The only copyrighted thing in this cover is the photograph below. Without the consent of the photographer, it is impossible to publish this cover under a free licence. If the photographer gives his/her consent, please use the procedure described here. BrightRaven (talk) 14:03, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Kani⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Kani,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Vortoj.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Pregxo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pregxo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Pregxo.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Sanktapetro.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sanktapetro.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Sanktapetro.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Krucumo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Krucumo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Krucumo.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Hieronimo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hieronimo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Hieronimo.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Sankta sebastiano.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sankta sebastiano.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Sankta sebastiano.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Kani, who is the painter? Creating a true reproduction of a painting does not make you the author. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi. I beg your pardon, Wikimedia works in English, but English is not my language, bur Spanish or Esperanto. I can read and write in English, but basicaly with mistakes or misunderstanding, mainly for technical affairs. The pictures are from painter El Greco (1541-1614) and I made photos in museums of Toledo (also for monuments in article Toledo in Esperanto version) during some excursions in Toledo two or three years ago.--Kani (talk) 09:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Florenco-2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2003:45:5C77:9B01:E48B:6C57:D9CF:9BE3 06:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
File:DoñaBárbara.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 17:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Kapitalo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kamolan (talk) 20:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Statuolibereco2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ww2censor (talk) 09:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Poemo de utnoa.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Poemo de utnoa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Poemo de utnoa.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- I can contact with the autor, which I know. I will answer.--Kani (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Portada0010001.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Portada0010001.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Portada0010001.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- I can contact with the autor, which I know. I will answer.--Kani (talk) 12:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Pri Azorín.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ies (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kovrilpaĝoj de Beletra Almanako, numeroj 28 al 30.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kovrilpaĝoj de Beletra Almanako, numeroj 28 al 30.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kovrilpaĝoj de Beletra Almanako, numeroj 22 al 24.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kovrilpaĝoj de Beletra Almanako, numeroj 22 al 24.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kovrilpaĝoj de Beletra Almanako, numeroj 16 al 23.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kovrilpaĝoj de Beletra Almanako, numeroj 16 al 23.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Beletra-Almanako-10-15.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Beletra-Almanako-10-15.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Beletra-Almanako-10-15.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 15:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
[edit]Dear Kani,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Katalin Kováts en Hannover en 2009.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi. Following your message and since this photo has appeared under an unfree license prior of being uploader here Katalin Kováts must send a permission via COM:OTRS. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:16, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will try.--Kani (talk) 11:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- HI. I received via email answer from Katalin Kováts, unfortunately in Esperanto. Mi, aŭtoro de tiuj ĉi fotografioj: KatiHannover2009.jpg, konsentas kun tio, por ke tiuj ĉi mia fotografio estu publikigita pere de Wikimedia Commons (https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katalin_Kov%C3%A1ts) sub licenco Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 Unported. Mi konscias, ke tiu ĉi verko povas esti libere reguligata kaj transprenata de pluaj flankoj al kia ajn celo inkluzive de komercaj. She gives permission. Is this enough?--Kani (talk) 12:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Done La permeso pri la uzo de la verko estas konfirmita kaj arkivita je 2019-05-19 / The permission for the use of the work is confirmed and filed / L'autorisation d'utilisation de l'œuvre est confirmée et déposée / El permiso para el uso de la obra se confirma y archiva.
- HI. I received via email answer from Katalin Kováts, unfortunately in Esperanto. Mi, aŭtoro de tiuj ĉi fotografioj: KatiHannover2009.jpg, konsentas kun tio, por ke tiuj ĉi mia fotografio estu publikigita pere de Wikimedia Commons (https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katalin_Kov%C3%A1ts) sub licenco Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 Unported. Mi konscias, ke tiu ĉi verko povas esti libere reguligata kaj transprenata de pluaj flankoj al kia ajn celo inkluzive de komercaj. She gives permission. Is this enough?--Kani (talk) 12:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will try.--Kani (talk) 11:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Moderna teatrejo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Posxtkartoj.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Posxtkartoj.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Duncan Charters.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Duncan Charters.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Duncan Charters.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
I received permission with the proper photograph, unfortunately in Esperanto, but Duncan Charters may send permission in English, since he is English. Kara amiko, Koran dankon pro via prezentado en la Kongreso de AEA-NZEA kaj respondo al miaj demandoj. Unu el la spertaj kontribuantoj helpis min, kaj mi registriĝis kaj faris unu redakteton (Charter al Charters sub la bildo). Mi tamen deziris ŝanĝi la bildon, sed tio montriĝis malfacila. Mi devos atendi 4 tagojn, esti farinta 10 modifojn, kaj eĉ tiam ne estas klare kiel fari tien. Ĉu vi facile povus interŝanĝi la bildon kaj anstataŭigi la alkroĉitan? Se estas eble por vi, mi dankos. Ĝi estas mia foto, sen kopirajta problemo. (This is my photograph without copyright problem). Kore salutas kaj bondeziras Duncan Duncan Charters lingvo@aol.com (Prezidanto de UEA). So, please don't erase the photo.--Kani (talk) 13:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Kani: Hi. Michael R. Weaver has to send a permission via COM:OTRS or Duncan Charters may do the same thing in explaining how he became copyright holder of the image. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
File:VojagxodeOnia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ƏXPLICIT 03:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Ww2censor (talk) 22:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
ƏXPLICIT 13:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Cheonggye Plaza en 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ox1997cow (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Helvetia-sidita.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Helvetia-sidita.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Discostu (talk) 20:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Busan-123.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Alkoholismo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Günther Frager (talk) 18:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
@Kani: En la esperanta vikipedio, je 5 nov. 2023 CommonsDelinker simple forigis la dosieron Alkoholismo.jpg el la paĝo Alkoholismo, kaj ekde tiam ĝi mankas tie. Kial vi ne konsideris lokan alŝuton? ThomasPusch (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sed Alkoholismo.jpg jam ne plu ekzistas. Mi ne scias fari lokan alsxuton. Tiu estis afisxo de cxirkaux 1936 fare de CNT, kies membro nun mi estas kaj kiu rajtigas min ties uzadon. Plej versxajne mi tiam argumentis aux povis argumenti, sed en tiuj medioj tio ne utilas kaj tiuj policanoj strikte agas nekonsiderinte la aferon. Foje mi ricevis fotojn de biografiitoj por esti alsxutita al respektivaj artikoloj, anstataux alia aux foresto, kaj denove tiuj policanoj prifajfis ecx se la propra koncernato rajtigas min tion fari, ekzemple Duncan Charters. Kani (talk) 18:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Thumbnail Rocio de Frutos-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Günther Frager (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Rocio de Frutos-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Günther Frager (talk) 18:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Verkoj de Miguel Delibes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Günther Frager (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
links category:Miguel Delibes eo:Miguel Delibes
File:El bandido adolescente.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
185.172.241.184 14:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sed estas nur simplaj linioj kaj literoj. Tial
This image of simple geometry is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. |
..... Evidente tiel estas ĝenerala opinio, ĉar krom tiu ĉi persona noto estas nenia signo ie ajn ke povus esti minaco pri forigo. ThomasPusch (talk) 21:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Alia statuo de Olavi Lanu en arbaro Lanupuisto sur monto Kartano.jpg
- File:Statuo de Lanu.jpg
- File:Statuo de geknaboj.jpg
- File:Grupa statuo en parko.jpg
- File:Statuo de flugantaj birdoj.jpg
- File:Statuo apud cxefa strato.jpg
- File:Statuo en parko.jpg
- File:Statuo de Paaskivi en parko.jpg
- File:Statuo de alko.jpg
- File:Mannerheim en Lahti.jpg
Yours sincerely, –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 06:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Jerónimo de Córdoba, 1920.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
–TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 06:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
File:222Simplajversajxojporkomencantoj.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
–TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 07:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Hm, la verkaĵo estas de 1995, ne sufiĉe aĝa por vere esti en publika havaĵo, tamen la kovrilbildo ne estas granda grafika artaĵo, kaj la eldonejo, se kontaktita kaj oni lasus al la homoj du monatojn da tempo ĉar ne ĉiu spertas pri forlasado de kopirajto se oni neniam faris iom ajn en la komunejo, certe konsentus pri liberigo por vikipedio. Sed ĉu vere oni bezonas VRTS-tikedon por ĉiu kovrilbildo en la komunejo?? Ekzemple file:10th Anniversary Cover Recipes Remembered.jpg estas kovrilbildo de libro el 2021 - ĉu ĝin kaj pli-malpli ĉiun enhavon el Category:Front covers of books kaj Category:Book covers ankaŭ necesas buĉi, se mankas aparta VRTS-tikedo? - file:10th Anniversary Cover Recipes Remembered.jpg evidente ne havas VRTS-tikedon. ThomasPusch (talk) 21:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
@Kani: Evidente, mi intertempe trovis la multajn librokovrilojn proponitajn por forigo. Mia demando pri tio do jam estas respondita. Sed mi tamen demandas al mi, kio estas pri la multaj kovrilbildoj kaj fotoj jam forigitaj. Ĉar multaj el ili unuavice interesas en la e-lingva vikio, nepre bonus alŝuto tie. La komuneje forigitan bildon File:Rocio de Frutos-1.jpg mi ne trovis tie, sed eble eĉ vanas simple serĉi per la komunumaj dosieronomoj, ĉar en la e-lingva vikio povas esti aliaj nomoj. Ĉiukaze, klaras ke la forigoj en la komunejo jam okazas pli longe, ekestis pro diversaj uzantoj, do ne ĉiuj estis venĝo pro aliloka malkontento pri via ago, kaj sendube klaras ke la e-lingva vikio estas multe pli taŭga stokejo por komuneje dubindaj dosieroj - tie (samkiel en la angla, itala kaj aliaj branĉoj) eĉ senprobleme eblas konservo baze de justa uzo. Cetere: Mi tre volus peti vin elekti belajn nomojn de dosieroj. "222 Simplaj Versaĵoj por Komencantoj.jpg" multe malpli konfuzigas ol "222Simplajversajxojporkomencantoj.jpg"... ThomasPusch (talk) 21:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:TierrayLibertad.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:TierrayLibertad.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |