User talk:JuTa/Archive 26

restore category

Hi! Please restore the created me Category:Statue of Danylo Halytskyi in Ternopil and deleted by you on 14:54, November 1, 2014.--Mykola Vasylechko 18:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

OK, its back. --JuTa 05:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Shortology images

Hi JuTa. I'm trying to create again the page "shortology". The author of the images (Matteo Civaschi) sent his permission to the address "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" on April the 14th, but the images have been deleted. How can I upload again the images or some of them? This is the list of the images already uploaded:

File:Shortology Matteo Civaschi Fraulein Mona.jpg. File:Shortology primo maggio.jpg File:Shortology 50 sfumature di grigio.jpg File:Shortology Father's Day150.jpg File:Shortology It's Monday.jpg File:Shortology The Lord of The Rings.jpg File:Shortology The Odissey.jpg File:Shortology beatles.jpg File:Life in five seconds.jpg File:Shortology.jpg

P.S. I know that the page "Shortology" has been deleted, but I'm trying to write it again in a proper way. I'm a neophyte on wikipedia, so I need to learn and to emprove. Thanks. --Immitch (talk) 19:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, in such cases you should include the template {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page, best with {{subst:OP}}; then you get the correct (current) date paremeters. This will prevent the deletion until the so called OTRS stuff will decide the case as valid or invalid, or until a maximum number of days which refects the current backlog in OTRS (currently its 75 days as far as I know). Alternatively for the current images, you could ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for them. But anyhow please be patient as the backlog is currently many weeks. regards. --JuTa 05:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

OTRS

About this, the OTRS was rejected as there was no clear permission to release the file, and the owner didn't respond to correct the issues. I think it can be eliminated now as the other file uploaded by the user. Willy Weazley 15:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, ok, but next time try to make that clearer. I.e. remove the {{OTRS pending}} from the description page and/or use edit comment clearifying the situantion. PS: if you are a member of the OTRS team please indicate this on your user page. regards. --JuTa 19:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:The Pharaoh - Wrestler.jpg

This picture should not have been removed. Consent and validation was sent to Permissions two days ago. Please look into this matter so the picture can be added back. I have not received a valid reason for deletion is noted. There's no justification to remove it. Thank you

Hi, in such cases you should include the template {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page, best with {{subst:OP}}; then you get the correct (current) date paremeters. This will prevent the deletion until the so called OTRS stuff will decide the case as valid or invalid, or until a maximum number of days which refects the current backlog in OTRS (currently its 63 days as far as I know). Alternatively for the current images, you could ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for them. But anyhow please be patient as the backlog is currently many weeks. regards. --JuTa 19:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Bohuslav Sobotka's picture

Hey, I noticed that you deleted picture of Bohuslav Sobotka from vlada.cz but I don't think you're right because this page http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cz/deed.en says that material can be used with credit and without commercial use and derivatives. Can you explain this to me please? Thanks

Hi, every image on Commons has the reuseable even commercialy and derivatives has to be allowed. See Commons:Licensing for details. --JuTa 19:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

So why picture of for example Stephen Harper is allowed? As I can see derivatives are allowed but commercial use is not. See https://www.flickr.com/photos/worldeconomicforum/6767390293/ - The picture is used in Wikipedia's article about Stephen Harper, thanks.

You talking about File:Stephen-Harper-January-26-2012.png, correct? It looks like the flickr user changed the license after it was checked OK on commons. As these licenses are inrecoverable it is still allowed to use it commercialy. But you might like to ask User:Materialscientist, perhaps he still remebers the details, perhaps he did a mistake in 2012. --JuTa 16:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:500vc ex leg Arabic.jpg

HI JuTa;

THe file File:500vc ex leg Arabic.jpg was translated from english to arabic and , and you can find the english file in commons --Touzrimounir (talk) 11:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Then you should name and link to the exact name of the source image on commons. And use the same license as the source image please (if that is a valid license). regards. --JuTa 16:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Can u have a look at this file, is that enough? File:5500vc ex leg Arabic.jpg

Yes, thats looking better I removed the problem tag. --JuTa 17:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Germania 70 Arabic.jpg

Hi JuTa. according to the files you announce me to delete. I didnt do anything but to translate them into Arabic. and I clarified that in the note. Now I'm new here and I dont know how to get this license. teach me instead of deleting my works. I need those photos in the article "The netherlands" in Arabic. thx--Wafaashohdy (talk) 11:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Then you should name and link to the exact name of the source image on commons. And use the same license as the source image please (if that is a valid license). regards. --JuTa 16:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of images of Sophie Robert and poster of Le Mur

Hi Jufa. You recently removed the above mentioned images from Commons on the ground that there is no OTRS permission since 8 February for them. I'm assisting the person who is the owner of the copyright for these images and who wants to put them on Wikimedia Commons. She sent an email in February as per instructions confirming that she owns the rights, but to no avail. What is therefore the correct procedure to avoid such misadventure as the abrupt deletion of the images? Dessources (talk) 21:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, please ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for this case. If everything checks out OK they will undelete the image. There is a huge backlog on the OTRS procedure, currently upto 63 days (see Category:OTRS pending), but we cannot keep such images "for ever" without a confirmation from OTRS stuff. PS: I am not a member of the OTRS team and cannot see such mails. I'm just cleaning up old backlogs from time to time. regards. --JuTa 21:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia-W-bold-in-square-Clean.svg

Eigtl. wollte ich Ihnen nicht schreiben aber nun tue ich es doch, ich wollte nur meine etwas genervte Haltung über Ihr simples Revertieren zur Kenntlichkeit geben. Da es keine vernünftige rationale Erklärung für die Behauptung gibt, erwarte ich auch nachfolgend keine von Ihnen. Aber evtl. könnten Sie unter Template_talk:Duplicate die Fragen beantworten. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  22:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Nun, die beiden Bilder sin nicht exakt gleich, sehr ähnlich aber nicht gleich. Dein Antrag stan da auch über 20 Tage ohne dass ein anderer Admin es entschieden hätte. Ich geb' zu: das ist ein Grenzfall, den man auch anders entscheiden könnte. Gruß --JuTa 22:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallo JuTa, im Detail hast du Recht, allerdings muss man dafür schon beide Grafiken mit einem Grafikprogramm (farblich unterschiedlich) übereinanderlegen, ansonsten kann man in Fragen SVG mir schon einigermaßen vertrauen. Der Unterschied ist eine symmetrische Verbesserung (und Zentrierung der Grafik an die Bildschirmgröße) beide ursprünglichen W waren schon identisch (das Clean war eine minimale Code- und Knoten-Vereinfachung, die absolut keine neue Version rechtfertigte) zudem überlappten beide die Leinwandgröße, also sind an den Enden abgeschnitten. Aber ich habe nun die Grafik noch einmal im Detail angepasst. Ich gebe zu dass eine komplette Ersetzung hier nicht angemessen ist (in Anbetracht der Anzahl der Einbindungen), sonder ein Redirect zureichen müsste. Grüße ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  04:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@:File:Emblem-favorite.png‎, gebe ich dir Recht, die kleineren Pixelversionen können zuweilen noch (mit Rastergrafik-Programmen) nachbearbeitet worden sein (Kontrast). Daher können die Pixelversionen tatsächlich in ihrer nativen Größe besser aussehen als die SVG (zumal hier auch andere Vektorvorlagen zugrunde liegen können, vgl. GNOME). Jedoch sehe ich hier nicht unbedingt einen Bedarf gegeben. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  09:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Naja, das sind IMHO alles Grenzfälle, die man so oder so entscheiden kann. Ich versuch im Moment nur den Rücktau in Category:Duplicate etwas abzuarbeiten. Gruß --JuTa 09:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

1974

Please restore that page so I can put some content in it. Evrik (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Its a complete empty gallery, but its back. Please fill it with content as soon as possible. regards. --JuTa 15:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Done. Evrik (talk) 19:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Portrait of Francis F. Lee.jpg

Hi JuTa. Could I get you to restore Special:undelete/File:Portrait of Francis F. Lee.jpg, please? The OTRS ticket number is 2015020510002564. The license is {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} and the author's name is Mary Pat Waldron. Thanks. --B (talk) 12:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, its back. Please update the description page as soon as possible. regards. --JuTa 12:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. --B (talk) 12:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Igreja de São Vicente-Guarda.jpg

The author didn't claim any copyright over the picture. Doesn't it make it free?Viet-hoian1 (talk) 12:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

No, everything is per default "all rights reserved" except otherwise explicity stated, sorry. --JuTa 12:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I asked the site where it was published if there are any copyright issues about the image. Anyway, I replaced the image in the Spanish Wikipedia with another one, from another church that is available on Wikimedia Commons, while I don't get any reply from it.Viet-hoian1 (talk) 15:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Well, you could ask the copright holder, which is normaly the photographer, if he likes to publish the image under a free license ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} is recommanded). If the agrees he has to send an email to the commons support team a documented on Commons:OTRS. Once you know the email was sent, you better replace the problem tag with {{subst:OP}}. This will prevent deletion until the case will be decided by OTRS stull a vali or invalid or for a maximum of 63 days (currently). And please put in the description the license template of his choice - see Commons:Copyright tags for the lot of possibilities. regards. --JuTa 16:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Clarence

Hi! Why did you delete the svg version, although I put the duplicate template on the png version? Svg is better… --Ákos97 (talk) 19:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I missed the png<->svg types and ust noticed the higher resolution. I switched it now. regards. --JuTa 20:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

No problem, thank you very much! :-) --Ákos97 (talk) 20:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Request

Hi Juta, you deleted an image I uploaded, File:Marshalsea, early 1900s, by Francis Hopkinson Smith.jpg as a duplicate. Can you send me the blurb, please? The other one doesn't say much about it, and has a less descriptive file name. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, the description was:

== {{int:filedesc}} ==

{{Information

|Description=Painting of the Marshalsea prison in the early 1900s, after it closed down. Possibly created when the artist visited London in 1913.

|Source=[[:en:Francis Hopkinson Smith|Francis Hopkinson Smith]], [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/27340/27340-h/27340-h.htm ''Outdoor Sketching''], New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1915. Also available at [http://www.reusableart.com/v/buildings/buildings-03.jpg.html reusable art.com]

|Date= Early 1900s

|Author=[[:en:Francis Hopkinson Smith|Francis Hopkinson Smith]] (1838–1915)

|Permission=

|other_versions=

}}

[[Category:Marshalsea]]

== {{int:license-header}} ==

{{PD-US}}

regards. --JuTa 06:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 04:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Scj Gov Sa Logo.png

تحية طيبة، الصورة شعار لجهة حكومية ومشاعة للاستخدام غير التجاري، آمل توضيح وجهة نظرك قبل الحذف. وشكراً.
مكي بن أحمد (talk) 16:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, every image on Commons has to be reuseable even commercialy - see Commons:Licensing. But another user has put a {{Pd-ineligible}} to the description page. Thats a borderline case, but I think its OK now. regards. --JuTa 16:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Lee Jordan Field in the snow.jpg

File:Lee Jordan Field in the snow.jpg an email was sent to OTRS, please restore the image. Thanks. Evrik (talk) 21:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it was pending since beginning of january without any action or reaction of OTRS stuff. After about 70 days such images are eligable for deletion. Please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for this case, as I am not a member of the OTRS team an cannot access those mails. regards. --JuTa 21:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Please restore it. I will ask right now. Evrik (talk) 22:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

You ask, and they will restore it if its OK. --JuTa 23:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

What they said was the ticket was there and it should have been handled differently. Perhaps you should become a member of the OTRS team so you can check these things before deleting them. Check out Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Lee Jordan Field in the snow.jpg Evrik (talk) 18:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

OK, I undeleted the file now. An OTRS member still needs to confirm the release. regards. JuTa 16:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

"No OTRS permission"

Hi JuTa. I just had an interesting comment in an OTRS ticket that I had never considered before. The requestor found the deletion summary "No OTRS permission" confusing and misunderstood it to mean that they had to get permission from OTRS in order to upload the image. Is that deletion summary coming from a template or a semi-automated tool like Twinkle? As a possible suggestion, could it be changed to say "No permission from the copyright holder processed by OTRS" or something like that? --B (talk) 17:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thats the standard reason when an admin pressed the "paper bin" if a {{OTRS pending}} image runs "out of time". Its likely definded in that template or within one of the sub-templates of it. You better ask there for a moification a I am not very familiar with (complicated) template code. regards. --JuTa 06:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

PS: Now I see its likely definded in {{No OTRS permission since}}. --JuTa 06:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Okay, thanks, I figured it was from a template somewhere. I will ask at COM:AN. --B (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Rocket Mass Heater Inside a Tipi.jpg

Hi JuTa, could you please undelete Special:Undelete/File:Rocket Mass Heater Inside a Tipi.jpg for me? The OTRS ticket number is 2015020310003816. Thanks. --B (talk) 00:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi B, its back. As before: please update the decription page. regards. --JuTa 06:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. --B (talk) 11:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Exhibition UNDER 35 in Palace of Art Minsk 13.05.2014 Oleg Kostiuchenko Tamara Shelest.JPG

You have removed a picture, on the publication of which was obtained by permission {PermissionOTRS|2015011610013711}{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all|author=Oleg Kostyuchenko}. The photo was captured by the author against the background of his painting. Tatiana Markina 15:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, it was not that one, it was File:Tour de Minsk - Exhibition of drawings in Palace of Art, Minsk 23.10.2014 Tamara Shelest.JPG. But you as the uploader set the OTRS tag yourself, as far as I can see you are not an OTRS volounteer. So, I asumed that the tag is invalid, because that template should *only* be set by OTRS staff. Why did you set it yourself? regards. --JuTa 18:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, artist Oleg Kostyuchenko sent me his permission, in order that I published photos of his paintings. The photos I do. In the permission it is written that I can place these photos and specify the number of permission. Return You the file back? File:Exhibition UNDER 35 in Palace of Art Minsk 13.05.2014 Oleg Kostiuchenko Tamara Shelest.JPG Tatiana Markina 01:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

No, in the file you mentioned there is no trace of any OTRS activity, neither by you now by somebody else. Please ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for your case. If everything checks out OK they will undelete the file(s) for you. I am not a member of the OTRS team an cannot see those mails. regards. --JuTa 07:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

"Missing permission"

It makes no sense to state that "there is no proof that the author agreed to license the file under the given license" when the uploader didn't even choose a license. So why use NPD instead of NLD, as has always been our custom? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Because if the uploader reacts to the nld with adding a license the nld should be removed and a npd should be added, why not adding that directly? --JuTa 06:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

File:The_Ark.jpg

先前上傳有關The Ark(Band)的那張圖，是非常被廣泛用於各種公開平台，介紹該團用的。基於被大量地使用，且照片本身既非商業性質的拍攝作品，使用的目的也非商業用途。我認為即使未特別附上使用許可，在已標註使用來源和版權所有者的情形，只是為了能讓更多人看見與認識該韓國團體(The Ark)且出於善意的使用，應該是不需刻意刪除的。

Hi, every image on commons has to be published under a free license, which allows anybody in the worl to reuse for any prupose even commercialy - compare Commons:Licensing. The problem with that image was it was ust copied from facebook. Facebook images are generally not compatible with commons. Every image in the net is per default "all rights reserved" and cannot be copied elsewhere. Sorry. but your images were just copyight violations. regards. --JuTa 08:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hi I'm Len Hesper alias Sue All from Rotterdam and found a remark from you in my mailbox about "rawhide cast png" license. I know nothing about how to contribute to wikipedia, but I would like to know more. This "png"-file is a part of a frame of an episode from Rawhide, found on YouTube. How can I get this picture in wikimedia ? Please help me. Sue All (talk) 14:11, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, every image on commons has to be published under a free license - see Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright tags. On your image such a license-template is completely missing. Only the copyight holder can give uch a license. Your image looks tike a movie or TV screenshot, which makes it had to etermine the copyright holder. Its likely the director of the movie shown. You would need to find this person, and ask him/her if he/she likes to pulish that images under a free license o his/her choice. If he/she agrees he/she has to write a mail to the commons support team as documented on Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 15:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Tomás Luis de Victoria

Bonjour Pouvez vous m'expliquer pourquoi vous avez changé la photo de File:Tomás Luis de Victoria en File:Antonio gardano.jpg ? Le site http://www.uma.es/victoria/index.html donne bien comme portrait de Tomás Luis de Victoria la photo que vous avez modifiée. (Pardon de vous écrire en français...) Fagairolles 34 (talk) 08:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but about which image exactly are ou talking about? The filename you wrote has never extisted on commons. I couldn't find similar filenames in your or my (recent) contribution either. regards. --JuTa 08:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Liinavaatteita.jpg

Hi, just for checking for file:Liinavaatteita.jpg. Was there any OTRS-request in the image page? (based on Google cache there were none and also there was no any notification at uploader user:Jjanhonen's talk-page. I think that there should be OTRS-permit at somewhere and i am just wrapping things up if somebody is asking what happened. --Zache (talk) 11:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, yes there was an {{OTRS pending}} since 16. February 2015, without any reaction from OTRS staff later. After some weeks this template automacticly adds a {{No OTRS permission since}} which makes them eligle for deletion one week after. The timespan differs depending on the backlog of the OTRS staff, currently its 68 days (see Category:OTRS pending). You may like to ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for this case. If there valid ticket for this image, they will undelete it. regards. --JuTa 11:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. --Zache (talk) 11:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Antonio Gardano

Hallo JuTa. Thank you for your intervention on the File:Antonio gardano.jpg, but the picture is a portrait of the spanish musician Tomás Luis de Victoria, and not of Antonio Gardano, as suggested by the files name. I think it would be better if this file will be deleted, or renamed with the right name. Thank you very much and best regards. --Antonella (talk) 14:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, you can request a rename with the template {{Rename}}. regards. --JuTa 18:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Post Office Kimry.JPG

Hello JuTa. This is my own work. I added the license. --Yokki (talk)

Hi, fine an thx. I removed the problem tag. --JuTa 19:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

All my pics got deleted even if they had the right license, or at least I think they had.

Hi, I saw you deleted all the pics I added yesterday night I'm really wondering why.

I mean, I paied attention to every license detail taking inspiration from other pics added from the same source and then why a pic with all my same licenses and details still is here and mine got ripped off?

Benzema in action against Schalke was taken by the same source of this other pic that still is here: This one.

Both mine and his pic features the same options and license details, why then my pics got deleted? I really paid attention to every detail and I broke my a$$ off adding these damn pics. I wanna have a reply. Thanks for your attention.

--Gherdez (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, the difference is that "your" images are published with a "non commercial" license on flickr. Every image on commons ha the be reueable for anybody even commercialy - compare Commons:Licensing. regards --JuTa 21:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Blanka mapa.jpg

Hello you have recently deleted image Blanka mapa.jpg - because no source since 25 April 2015?? I guess this is a mistake, please immediately recorver image back, description on image clearly state that this is my own work. Thanks. Jirka.h23 (talk) 19:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

No, its not your own work, its a satelite image (from google maps?). You may added the yellow/orange lines yourself. But that doesn't make you the copyright holder of the satelite image. regards. --JuTa 21:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Arian Baptistry ceiling mosaic - Ravenna Edit.jpg

Hallo, ist {{own}} keine gültige Lizenz mehr? was fehlt überhaupt in der Seitenbeschreibung, um einen langjährigen Benutzer eine automatische Nachricht zu hinterlassen?. Ich bin ratlos. Mein Intention hier war eine weitere Version von einem Bild von PetarM hochzladen, um es ggf. als Alternative hier anzubieten. Poco² 19:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, {{Own}} was never a license template, but just states that it is (your) own work. This one isn't your own work, but to fix is just use the license template from the original image which is {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. regards. --JuTa 21:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

What do we mean with {{Own}}? the uploader or the specified author? Poco² 18:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Well, the {{Own}} might be OK here, but please update the license. Otherwise the file will get deleted in about one week. regards. --JuTa 07:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Deleted picture

I would also like to know what was the reason for deleting my pictrue from wiki commons. The name was File:Edyta_Nawrocka_main_pic.jpg I'm sure i got all metadata right and besides, I'm the author so i believe i have right to upload a picture and give rights for use.

Hi, there was a {{OTRS pending}} since 2. February within the description page of the file. There was no reaction from any so called OTRS volounteer. After several weeks or months such files become eligable for deletion. The image is widely visible on other pages like [1] [2] or [3]. So I assume thats not your own work. I've sou allready sent out the mail to the OTRS team, please ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for this case, if not please do so. regards. --JuTa 07:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Jobboard Finder Logo

Hi JuTa, Thank you very much for your message. I am aware that there is a copyright status problem with this logo. How can I prove that I can use this logo? Is an email a sufficient proof for that ? Thanks for your answer. Regards Kelly Lawson23 (talk) 12:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, this is a borderline case of COM:TOO. You might use {{PD-textlogo}} together with {{Trademarked}}. Otherwise ask the copyright holder if he likes to publish the image under a free license of hi choice ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} is recommended). If he agrees he has to send an email to the commons support team as documented on Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 07:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Naonobu Ajima.jpg

Hi JuTa! I will try to obtain the right permission to publish this file. If I reach, I will send it to permission board; if not, feel free to delete the file. Thanks. --Ferran Mir (talk) 17:45, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, if you have success, please ad {{OTRS pending}} to the description page, best through {{subst:OP}}. This will prevent the deletion for several weeks or until the case will be decided as vali or invalid. regards. --JuTa 07:32, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Nobel Prize certificate for Wilhelm Ostwald 1909 - Chemistry.jpg

Hallo, ich habe vom Vergeben der “richtigen” Lizenzen wenig Ahnung und habe deshalb beim Hochladen aus der Eingabemaske folgende vorgegebene Lizenz ausgewählt:

“CC BY 3:0”

Ich habe die beiden Fotos selbst aufgenommen im Wilhelm-Ostwald-Museum in Großbothen, in welchem kein Fotografierverbot bestand. Vielleicht können Sie mir ja beim Lizensieren helfen. Mit Dank und freundlichen Grüßen Je-str (talk) 14:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, ein andere User hat zwichenzeitlich den "problem-tag" entfernt, obwohl ich nicht sehr glücklich damit bin. Denn ie Urkunde hast ja nicht Du entworfen. Das wäre eigentlich ein Fall für {{PD-art}} bzw. {{PD-scan}}. Weißt Du, bzw. kannst Du herausfinden, wer diese Urkunde entworfen hat, und wie lang er/sie gelebt hat. Dann solttest Du die Lizenz gegen z.B. {{PD-scan|PD-old-auto-1923|deathyear=xxxx}} ersetzen, wobei xxxx das Todesjahr ist. Gruß --JuTa 07:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, Der Name der Gestalterin dieser Urkunde ist im Ostwald-Museum aufgeführt. Leider habe ich ihn nicht notiert - kann ich aber recherchieren. Je-str (talk) 17:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, das wäre toll. Gruß --JuTa 18:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Goodgame-Pix

Hallo JuTa,
die Files File:Goodgame Empire Screenshot Burg.jpg und File:Goodgame Studios Westend Village Campus new.jpg waren von einem auf de:wp verifizierten Account (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Goodgame) hochgeladen worden. Letzteres zeigt zudem ein Haus. Was für Permissions haben denn da gefehlt?
Viele Grüße, Grueslayer (talk) 20:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab' die Bilder wieder hergestellt und einen Hinweis auf den verifizierten Account hinterlassen. Das waren ja meist Computer-Spiel-Screenshots, und die sin zu 99% einfach auch es Web kopiert bzw. per Screenshot erstellt und damit zu 99% copyright violations. Die globalen Beiträge des Account bzw. seine Benutzerseite auf den diversen Projekten hatte ich nicht gecheckt. Gruß --JuTa 20:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hallo JuTa,

ich hab zwei Artikel, die ich auf de:WP auf der Beo hab, auf die Version mit Bild zurückgesetzt. Mehr kann ich nicht tun.

Viele Grüße, Grueslayer (talk) 20:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, ich hatte extra jeweils noch in den delinker-log (Beispiel) geschaut. Da war nix. Das Tool ist dann wohl nicht nutzbar, da es ein anderer Bot entlinkt hat. Gruß --JuTa 21:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Egal, ist ein Firmenaccount, der wird sich wohl selbst drum kümmern. ;-) Viele Grüße, Grueslayer (talk) 05:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Abhijit_Pawar.jpg

Agreement license sent. Ticket#2015051310004827 (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abhijit_Pawar.jpg). Can you possibly restore the image? Thanks in advance. imrandindore (talk) 03:07, 13 May 2015 (IST)

Hi, I see somebody else was quicker an allready undeleted the file. regards. --JuTa 04:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

File:DiscursodeRenunciaJacoboArbenz1954.ogg

Hi!, look what you 've sent me and requested have not removed the template. please could verify this. Thank you. --GuatExp (talk) 01:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, verified. Its a audio recording of a speech in 1954. You are not the speeker nor the recorder of this. The copyright likely belongs to the speeker and/or recorder of it. You cannot publish it under a free license, sorry. --JuTa 07:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

So which template you suggest I use to indicate that this file is a sound recording?--GuatExp (talk) 22:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The license of the copyright holders choice. Try to find him and ask him if the likes to publish it under a free license. If he agrees he had to send an email to the commons support team as documented under Commons:OTRS. regards. JuTa 06:32, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey, look I have already sent an email to Wikipedia, at the address where I was told, but have not removed the template, I sent about May 2, Thank you! --GuatExp (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

OK, I replaced the problem tag now with {{OTRS pending}}. regards. --JuTa 06:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Logo-pu-Aquin.png

File:Logo-pu-Aquin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Basvb (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

{cite news|title=2,000 See Launching of Submarine Chaser | access-date=February 25, 2015|publisher=Brooklyn Eagle| date=February 14, 1942}

JuTa:

Why are you marking this photo for deletion? The Brooklyn Public Library, the owner, has told me this is in the public domain. How may I have a real dialogue with you? My email address is davecary6@gmail.com. 99.101.114.247 13:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, about which image you are talking about? Please let me know the exact file name. regards. JuTa 15:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Les état-Unis - fin des années 0050.jpeg

Hallo, gibt es für diese Datei eine Löschdiskussion?--Sinuhe20 (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Nein, das war ein Schnelllöschantrag von User:Agamitsudo, dem ich stattgegeben habe. Gruß JuTa 07:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Ziarat ashoora.jpg

I saw that you have deleted the image of Ziyarat Ashura (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ziarat_ashoora.jpg) from the article. I have written that the file was my own work. Why you deleted it? user: Rastegarfar.mo

Because its likely not you own work. The complete text on it is your own work? You have "painted" the ornaments an the frame yourself? --JuTa 07:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Release of photo of Babe Curran

Agreement licence sent through as requested for Ticket#: 2015051010006036 (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Babe_Curran_on_right_at_Goulburn_Wool_Sales,_1_Dec_1954.png). Thanks MPCR (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, in this case you should put {{OTRS pending}} to the description page, best using {{subst:OP}}. I did it now for you - see here. regards. --JuTa 17:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:FC Barcelona 1984-1985.JPG

Hi JuTa. Please delete other files! --ManFromNord (talk) 18:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the note. I don't like to delete them myself, but I marked the as {{Speedy}}. regards. --JuTa 18:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Martin_Doherty_(CHVRCHES).JPG

Appropriate information regarding this photo was sent via email on May 3 and evidently completely disregarded. Please undelete.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Martin_Doherty_(CHVRCHES).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1

Hi, its back. I've used now the template {{OTRS pending}}, which indicates that the permission-mail was sent, an prevents deletion for several weeks, or until the case will be decided as vali or invalid. Next time please use that template yourself. If ou know uner which license the copyright holder likes to publish this image please use the corresponding license template on the description page - compare Commons:Copyright tags. regards. --JuTa 20:39, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Olga Havlová - portrét.jpg

Hello, I would like to ask you for restoring File:Olga Havlová - portrét.jpg which you deleted for no permission problem. The permission came to OTRS. I asked on administrator noticeboard about week ago but with no response. Thank you --Mates (talk) 12:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, please ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for this case. If there is a vali release for this image, they will undelete it. regards. --JuTa 19:19, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Mettre une image dans Commons

Bonjour, JuTa! Je ne suis pas très compétent pour mettre des images dans Commons, tout d'abord parce que je ne comprends pas très bien les instructions en anglais. Pourrais-tu voir si c'est possible d'y mettre ceci: Dialectes hongrois, et de le faire à ma place? Je t'en remercie par avance. Amator linguarum

Sorry, you cant use/upload that. The source site states (c) Média Index Egyesület 1999-2015. Everything in the internet is per default "all rights reserved" except otherwise explicity stated, so you cant just copy images out of the net to use them on commons. regards. --JuTa 07:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Restore Pvo_logo.png

[4]

You delete "Pvo_logo.png" on purpose: "No license since 3 May 2015") What needed to restore this file? Code Crusader (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Code Crusader

A valid license template was missing. You could try to reupload it an use {{PD-textlogo}} together with {{Trademarked}}. But I'm not sure it thats above Commons:Threshold of originality in Russia or not. I cannot guarantee that somebody else could raise a deletion request for it. The savest method would be to ask the copyright holder if he likes to publish it under a free license of his choise. If he agrees he has to send an email to the commons support team as documented in Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 18:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

This logo was taken from Politic Parties' homepage & used in the wiki page of the same Politic party (PVO) партиявеликоеотечество.рф (top left corner). I don't think that official logos of Coca-cola or Microsoft or etc needed any permisions by those companies to used it in there wiki Pages. Am I right or wrong? Code Crusader (talk) 19:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC) Code Crusader

Every image on commons has to be useable for anybody in the world for any purpose (including commercialy), not only on "their" wikipedia pages - see Commons:Licensing. If you upload an image you permit everybody to use it anywhere. And you can only permit that if you have to rights to do so. Only the copyright holder can to that. regards. --JuTa 19:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok, can I download this image directly to PVO wiki page? ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Инкубатор:Партия Великое Отечество By-passing "Commons".. Code Crusader (talk) 19:19, 15 May 2015 (UTC) Code Crusader

There are some countries/projects which allow so called Commons:Fair use. I dont know the situation in Russia. You may like to ask on i.e ru:Википедия:Форум/Вопросы for it. regards. --JuTa 19:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank's for your advices and cooperation. Code Crusader (talk) 19:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC) Code Crusader

My photo upload of Sigmund Freud and other photos

Hello. I am going to research the copyright issues around the photo tonight or tomorrow with my father. I think he's more knowledgeable about these areas than I am, and he's helped me with editing wikinews, his wiki account is Dr.PaulBustion. I will let you know if I found that it is allowed what my evidence is. Best regards, Paul F. Bustion III PaulBustion88 (talk) 20:27, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, the Sigmund Freud image is looking likely as {{PD-old}} because its likely made in the 1860s an the photografer should have died before 1945 (70 years ago). The other images looking just like copyright violations, I'm afraid. --JuTa 20:33, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

There was one other image of Sigmund Freud I uploaded. Since he died in 1939, I highly doubt there is still copyright on that one either. You might be right about the other ones though. PaulBustion88 (talk) 21:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I guess you are talking about File:Sigmund-Freuds-daughter-Anna-1920.1.jpg, correct. Well, the {{PD-US}} license would only be valid if this image was made or first published within the USA. As far as I can see Freu never lived in the USA. If it was made i.e. in Austria it would be protected until 70 years past the death of the photografer (not the model). So I would like to ask you to find out the photografers name an his life-dates. regards. --JuTa 04:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll try later today, I'm not doing it now though. My father has agreed to help me find it. He also has an account here called Dr.PaulBustion. He's Paul Bustion, Jr. I'm Paul III. He'd probably be better at finding the information than I am. We'll be working on it later. Best regards,

Paul Bustion III. PaulBustion88 (talk) 07:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok, the Freud Museum holds the copyright to the photos, and said via e-mail they would sell it to me if I pay a fee.

"Paul Futrall Bustion,

Thank you for your email. The Freud Museum holds the copyright for these two images and we can grant permission for publication by a third party. In order to calculate the copyright fee I would need to know a few details about your publication: One edition or further editions World rights or one language rights Print run Image use (cover or inside) Once I have this information I can quote you a fee. Many thanks Bryony Bryony Davies Curator Freud Museum London 20 Maresfield Gardens London, NW3 5SX PaulBustion88 (talk) 11:27, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, that realy does not soun like a free license. They wanna know how you like to use the image to calculate the value of the bill for you, but they have to allow every body in the world to use it for any purpose without any fee. regards. --JuTa 18:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Actually, something was clarified due to a following email exchange between the Freud Museum and myself.

"Dear Paul

Thanks for getting back to me. Apologies, I misunderstood and thought you were publishing a hard-copy. This is fine; since they are lo-res and in the public domain there is no need for official copyright status. Though could you please include the caption ©Freud Museum London or Courtesy of the Freud Museum London – whichever you prefer.

Many thanks Bryony

Bryony Davies Curator

Freud Museum London 20 Maresfield Gardens London, NW3 5SX Tel: 020 7435 2002" So all I have to do for copyright is write, "Courtesy of the Freud Museum". If you need to see the email for confirmation of the permission, I can forward it to you also. PaulBustion88 (talk) 19:23, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, please forward it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org as documented at Commons:OTRS --JuTa 19:27, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, I just emailed it to them. I also emailed them a response I got from the owners of the photo of President Bush I, David Rockefeller, and Happy Rockefeller, the owners asked me to link their specific photo to see if they would give me the copyright. So I should be able to find out soon whether I can publish it. PaulBustion88 (talk) 19:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Concerning Deletion of Trapa Rossica Photographs

Hi, is there any way to fix the licenses for the Trapa rossica photos and save them from being deleted? The photographer gave me explicit permission to post and use them in Wikipedia.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:03, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, ask the copright holder if he likes to publish the images under a free license of his choice which allows anyone in the world to use them for any purpose (the license {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} is recommanded (Use for Wikipedia only is not enough). If he agrees he has to send an email to the commons support team as documented in Commons:OTRS. Once you know the email has been sent you better put the themplate {{OTRS pending}} to the description page, best using {{subst:OP}}. This will prevent the deletion of the file for several weeks or until the case will be decided as valid or invalid. regards. --JuTa 05:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the advice.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:53, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Uploads by CBA11

Hi JuTa, I've noticed that you've turned two 'no source' tags in uploads by CBA11 into regular DR. No problem with that. However, please keep them in your watch list. Other files by CBA11 have been deleted on the same grounds ('no source') and I guess they should be reviewed if the community decide to keep the files you've nominated for deletion. Best regards --Discasto _talk 14:34, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Bush_Karl.jpg

Hi JuTa, could you please undelete File:File:Bush_Karl.jpg for me? I believe it was a license for this file {[PD-old-70}} or I am wrong? He was born in 1872 and the picture was made between 1900 and 1912. So, more than 100 years gone from the moment he was pictured. Leolevtov (talk) 14:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, its back. I fixed the description page - see here. --JuTa 18:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Cote des Bar.jpg

Ce fichier est une partie de celui-ci déjà créé par Utilisateur:DalGobboM sous Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International, 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license. Il doit donc être donc réutilisable probablement sous la même license mais dans le doute, j'ai préféré m'abstenir et en avertir DalGobboM sur sa PdD, sans réponse à cette date. Dans un tel cas, quelle license utiliser ?

I will try to translate in my very poor English

This file is only a part of this one drawn by Utilisateur:DalGobboM under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International, 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license. It may be use again under the same license ? But I am not sure and I had better to write DalGobboM on its PdD : no answer to day. In this case, what license ? Thank you very much for your answer.--Claude PIARD (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

I imported again this file under the true licence. Thank for your advertissement.--Claude PIARD (talk) 22:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, you should edit the description page of File:Cote des Bar.jpg and use the same license templates as on File:Vignobles champagne.svg which are {{GFDL}} and {{Cc-by-sa-all}}. regards. --JuTa 07:31, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

remove restriction on photo

Hi! recently you deleted a photo i uploaded (Yuval_Diskin_.jpg). Sorry about that. I obtained permission and uploaded it to the hebrew wikipedia server. But I can't move it to wikicommons, since you deleted it. Could you please remove the restriction? Thank you. Goony663 (talk) 09:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, there was an {{OTRS pending}} since 2. Feb. without any reaction of some OTRS staff. After several weeks such files become eligable for deletion and automatcly sorted into Category:Media missing permission. Please ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for this case if there was a valid release from the copyright holder. If everything checks out OK they will undelete the image. regards. --JuTa 18:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

File:MazdaSceneTreffen2004.jpg

File:MazdaSceneTreffen2004.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

OSX II (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

File:MazdaSceneTreffen2006.jpg

File:MazdaSceneTreffen2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OSX II (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Mazdatreffen2005 2.jpg

File:Mazdatreffen2005 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OSX II (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

File:MazdaSceneTreffen2004 2.jpg

File:MazdaSceneTreffen2004 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OSX II (talk) 02:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Hunnan-1.jpg and File:Agro.jpg

Hello, the school has sent a copyright email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, could you please restore especially File:Hunnan-1.jpg and File:Agro.jpg? Thank you--Neyc.alumni.france (talk) 11:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, please ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for this case. If there is a valid release by the copyright holder, they will undelete the image. But please be patient there is normaly a huge backlog within OTRS. regards. --JuTa 05:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

File:MazdaSceneTreffen2004.jpg

File:MazdaSceneTreffen2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

?

This media file has been nominated for deletion since 18 May 2015. To discuss it, please visit the nomination page.

Do not remove this tag until the deletion nomination is closed.

Reason for the nomination: This file was initially tagged by Dman41689 as no permission, but I cant find an external source to doubt own work as claimed.

This file is my own work; Thank you. Nancy Wong aka Edmunddantes

Dim Sum photos

Hello. You've been captioning the Dim Sum photos over at Wikipedia as "A [deleted] scene from the film", but the images on Commons are credited as "Photo by Nancy Wong". Are these on-set photos that you took yourself, or stills from the film that you've just accidentally applied boilerplate credits to at Commons? Wikipedia has to be a little more careful with the usage rights of film stills, so it'd be good to know which they are. --McGeddon (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

   See above post. This account is by Nancy Wong. --Túrelio (talk) 22:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

       Yes, I just wanted to check that she hadn't accidentally copy-and-pasted "Photo by Nancy Wong" onto some uploaded film stills from Dim Sum, given that she's been captioning them as simply "A scene from the film" over at Wikipedia. --McGeddon (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying, and thanks for releasing a lot of great, iconic photos under a CC licence. Feel free to add as much detail as you can about the photos when uploading them - I noticed a few of your Dim Sum photos were just described as being from "an indie film" without naming it. The more context you can give to the photos, even if it seems unrelated to the Wikipedia article you're intending to add them to, the more use other people can get out of them in the future. --McGeddon (talk) 10:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, but what exactly ou trying to tell me? --JuTa 18:13, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Point Reflection.jpg

Hallo JuTa, der file ist auf enwiki und dort zum Transfer auf commons getaggt, aber noch nicht transferiert. Autor hat ihn freigegeben. Ich habe transfer versucht, war mir aber zu kompliziert. M.E. gut geeignet, einfacher und besser als die Grafiken , die in der Kategorie "Symmetry" versammelt sind. Ob du den file von enwiki rüberschieben kannst? Kann ihn auf swwiki gut gebrauchen Kipala (talk) 09:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I fixed the description page now - see here. Next time please try that yourself. regards. --JuTa 18:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Supercell final fr.jpg

Salut,

J'avais oublié de mettre la licence lors du téléchargement. Je viens de le faire. Est-ce que j'ai une autre action à prendre?

---

Thanks for the reminder, I forgot to put the license on download. Now that I have put a license on the file, do I have any other action to take?

Pierre cb (talk) 13:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Fine, thx :) --JuTa 18:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Logo de la Facultad de Musica de la UNAM.jpg

Hola JuTa!!. Creo que el archivo que borraste del Logo de la Facultad de Música de la UNAM no es una violación de derechos de autor. Considero que son formas geométricas simples similares a este: archivo. Esperó puedas volver a subir mi archivo. Saludos!!

Hi, the file was marked as copyright violation by User:Ellin Beltz with the reasoning: at source: Hecho en México, todos los derechos reservados 2009. Esta página puede ser reproducida con fines no lucrativos, siempre y cuando no se mutile, se cite la fuente completa y su dirección electrónica. De otra forma requiere permiso previo por escrito de la institución.Hecho en México, todos los derechos reservados 2009. Esta página puede ser reproducida con fines no lucrativos, siempre y cuando no se mutile, se cite la fuente completa y su dirección electrónica. De otra forma requiere permiso previo por escrito de la institución. Its a borderline case, please raise an Commons:Undeletion request to get more opinions. regards. --JuTa 03:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

borrar por favor / delete

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stephanie.jpg

No, its in use. I dont see why. regards. --JuTa 03:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

crat candidature

Dear JuTa. Your name has been mentioned at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard. Please let me know if you are available for a crat candidature. Thank you. --Krd 07:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I now thought a while about it and resulted: Yes, I would be available. best regards. --JuTa 05:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Jee 10:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Please see: Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/JuTa --Krd 00:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

My Photos

Hello, the photos I uploaded, is taken by me. I add permission tag as soon as possible. Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk)‍ 10:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I saw aou allready added license templates to some of your recent uploads. Thats good. But there are still some missing. Please do so for the rest of your uploads, otherwise they will get deleted in about one week. Look for "your" images within Category:Media without a license as of 24 May 2015. regards. --JuTa 18:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done now ;-) Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk)‍ 20:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)