User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2020/June

Yura Dashevsky

Hi Jeff - is it about the images of the Freedom FM Radio's geographic coverage? These are official and publicly available images. Can't make it up. Would you prefer links? Thanks Yura Dashevsky (talk) 01:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

@Yura Dashevsky: Please comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yura Dashevsky instead.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Reply regards speedy deletion

Hello @Jeff G.: I agree that Hande Ercel images are a copyright violation. It happens by a mistake. I uploaded it from youtube cc. But it turns out to be non verified channel. And some images of Turkish actor are also copyright which DR is currently going on. I know and I admit I made up a big mistake. And my deletion count is not geniune at all. Thanks for making the community copyright violation free and sorry for messing up thing. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 01:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@C1K98V: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:55, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Should I have to tagged the rest DR to speedy. Please reply. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 01:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@C1K98V: You may tg anything with good reason.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 02:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Jeff G.: I have to be a license reviewer to tag file for CSD. Please reply. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@C1K98V: Partially right. You are not a license reviewer and are thus not allowed to use COM:CSD#F4, so I undid your tags.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Which CSD tag should I use. And do have a look of my today's contribution. Please guide me. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@C1K98V: I haven't seen any good reasons for speedy deletion from you yet. Please read COM:CSD closely and think about what reasons you have that fit, then explain how they fit below.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I have gone through and read the COM:CSD policy closely. I understand that I have to used the F1. And using this F1 tag I would get blocked due to copyright violation. And I'm not afraid of getting blocked. I feel bad that I tried to contribute but I messed up. Thanks, alot. I'm going to tag F1 to my upload tomorrow. As I don't to engage in edit war. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 04:16, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

User images

Hi, Jeff G., could you take a look at the images from Hamsterianax. Imo they are out of scope. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@Lotje: I tagged the files and warned the user.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you every so much Lotje (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@Lotje: You're ever so welcome!   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

answer to who snapped the photo re deletion request

sorry i missed that Jeff. it's not a single photo. Its a composite of several Manhattan street shots that I have taken over a period of time and put together in Elastic Reality. All of the "photo digitals" are composites. I keep a database of images, some abstract to merge with perhaps other realities.Janvermont (talk) 14:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Janvermont (talk) 14:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

response to your question Jeff about my the nomination for deletion of my file:presenting norman mailer.

except for the first of twelve images which is a "welcome" to the subject of Sinclair Lewis' last interview, all the images have two parts. all the graphics were created by me including the text graphics, but of course the words themselves are those of Sinclair Lewis. They come verbatim from his last interview which was in 1948. I created the twelve composites about three months ago and they will be shown second semester 2020 at Tufts University to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the issue of IBM's first patent. I created them in my studio. I want to put them in a gallery on wikimedia commons. all my work and my sources are documented. at this point i want to check if i have answered all your questions so i have to go back to them. I need to publish here to save this response. if i missed something i'll be back. when i received the nominated for deletion i thought it was an underworld euphemism for getting a hitman to rub someone out. two smileys. so i focused on thisJanvermont (talk) 13:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC) image but its part of the whole. thank you, JanJanvermont (talk) 13:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

It is a composite of several images taken over a period of years on the sidewalks of New York city. one of the shapes in that image is of mall area on the sidewalk sculpture of Tony Rosenthal outside the 58th branch of the New york public library. Several of my shots have been printed on metal and hang inside on the library walls above the main bookcases;;Janvermont (talk) 14

44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

@Janvermont: Thanks, that helped me make up my mind about Commons:Deletion requests/File:Presenting norman mailer.tif.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

talk to meJanvermont here. I’m prepared for bad news. I am legally entitled to use that imagery, I checked that. If I did something wrong, please tell me.Janvermont (talk) 18:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

talk to me You said to talk to you with respect to your notification on a giant page with Brianne and J Mabel. I do believe that the words I concur we’re not US but I’m not sure. I know that this image is a component in an educational piece. If you saw the various remarks from Norman Mailer and Sinclair Lewis you would understand what has happened. But I cannot do more until I have guidance. Please tell me if I should remove all the images from my uploads.Janvermont (talk) 20:33, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

[User:Jeff G./talk|talk to me]]my sequence of twelve images including “presenting Norman Mailer” is not “art for art's sake” If viewed as an entity the sequence of images is clearly an educational tool. Res ipsa.Janvermont (talk) 20:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

talk to meI just remembered, I uploaded several images to wikimedia some years ago which had the same imagery sources and same compositing tools and techniques and they are viewable. At first they were nominated for deletion because I had been given,by a nice Wikipedia editor, the Category - Janice Lourie. When I used it I just declared my “user Id”Janvermont (talk) 19:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC) to be Janvermont, like I do for most websites and they thought the work was not my own. In any case it can’t be the photography or the compositing software or technique that is a problem this time. The images about which I speak are in Category:Janice Lourie. Artworks by Janice LourieJanvermont (talk) 19:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

talk to meJanvermont here. responding about all source material used in the composite image "presenting norman mailer". reviewing: structural source is a segment of the sculpture Rondo by Tony Rosenthal. He was alive and had a studio in Central Park when I first took some photos of his sculpture and he told me that photographs were authorized. To provide, or mix with the strength of Sinclair Lewis' interview, I used a photo of a relection. As I walk in Manhattan I see images in puddles , windows, fire hydrants, doorknobs etc. I use them in composites but i do not save them. In a simple composite like the one in question I make a filter shape to blend the images together. I saw strong and gentle qualities in Norman Mailer.The upper left of the image uses the soft reflection.Janvermont (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Indentation

w:WP:THREAD says:

Generally colons and asterisks should not be mixed; if you see asterisks are being used in a page, use them as well.

The discussion where you complained had an asterisk before you joined. You did not remove this asterisk, nor did you remove the asterisks from my later comment (which resulted in a silly horizontal line of bullet points). Be consistent. Brianjd (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

@Brianjd: When I made my initial edit to that section, you had added a convenience link which was not a reply. I added a reply with a single colon. Then the OP added a reply with no punctuation. I think you should have just added two colons to the OP's reply and then replied with three colons. Alternatively, you could have just replied to the OP's reply with one colon. Asking you not to mess with my punctuation while simultaneously messing with yours would have been hypocritical of me.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

@Brianjd: Also, in this edit, you deliberately changed the format of the punctuation for replies by both me and De728631. That is not ok.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Not Advertising

Hi Jeff, Received your message. We only want to do right by Wiki Commons. Third Chapter Wikipedia page is almost ready for the review which will be linked to this logo, we're not using Third Chapter logo as promotional/advertising purposes on Wiki Common, we want to educate young adults of our label/works/achievements/collaboration's. How do we do this the right way in short. If you feel this violates your policy please let me know. Cheers, Willl Kendalll (talk) 11:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Willl KendalllWilll Kendalll (talk) 11:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC) (25/06/2020)

@Willl Kendalll: Please read en:WP:MFA and en:WP:COI.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

User:Marcelonettorodrigues

Hi Jeff, I don't understand why I could not update the new version of the logo for "Public Services International"? the one being shown on Wikipedia now is from 2018. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcelonettorodrigues (talk • contribs) 13:31, 26 June 2020‎ (UTC)

@Marcelonettorodrigues: Please see COM:FILTERT#Another Report by Marcelonettorodrigues.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

ok! got it! thanks. I will try to upload a .SVG file then - if it does not work, then I will try to do the whole process you mentioned, thanks again ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcelonettorodrigues (talk • contribs) 16:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC) it worked! thanks again @Jeff G. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcelonettorodrigues (talk • contribs) 17:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

@Marcelonettorodrigues: You're welcome. Wouldn't it work better if the logo touched all four sides of the frame?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

File:OV-10A Bronco of VMO-1 takes off from USS Nassau (LHA-4), in 1983 (6429213).jpg

Just a comment. The caption for this picture may not be accurate. The aircraft involved is stated as being from VMO-1. I was a member of VMO-1 at the time of the photo. The orange paint scheme is a distinctive marking of aircraft that belong to the Navy’s Flight Test program conducted out of NAS Patuxent River, MD. The aircraft may have once belonged to VMO-1 but if the paint scheme is any indicator the aircraft was transferred to the flight test program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zetta2492 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Pinging @Cobatfor as uploader.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 17:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi. thank you for your information. Concerning the old U.S. Defenseimagery files that are now on NARA, often the information given is problematic. One of the best examples is this photo File:F-4J Phantom II of VF-92 in flight in 1973.jpg which was taken some 22 years ealier than stated in the caption. There is a series about OV-10 Broncos aboard USS Nassau. The date given is an indicator that something might not be correct. I found out that when the date is "1 January", often it is an indicator that the person who put it online did not know when it was taken. The original file name "330-CFD-DN-SC-88-00799" can be an indication that the photo was taken actually much later, as most files were filed in the same year or the following year. In the other photos, the tail code of VMO-1 "ER" is visible. But this my be a completely different aicraft. I loaded this up twelve years ago and at that time I probably assumed that the plane was from VMO-1 as much as I assumed that the photo was taken in 1983. Therefore, any additional information is always welcome! Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 05:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)