User talk:J o
 ファースト・ステップ チュートリアルファースト・ステップは、アカウント作成後にすると良い事などがわかりやすく記載されています。このページでは、あなたのアカウントのインターフェースをちょっぴり使いやすくカスタマイズしたり、ファイルをアップロードする方法や、ファイルに必要なライセンスの基本的な部分を説明しています。ちょっとした質問がございましたらよくある質問へどうぞ。ここでの活動に必要なスキルは全くありません。ここでの編集は大胆に、他のユーザーに対する善意を持って投稿してくださるようお願いします。これはwikiでできています -- 本当に簡単ですよ。  助けを借りてみるウィキメディア・コモンズで何をすれば良いか探している際には、コミュニティ・ポータルをご覧下さい。質問がございましたら井戸端で聞く事も出来ますし、IRCに接続できる環境があれば、チャンネル#wikimedia-commons（日本語でも可ですが、英語推奨）につないでリアルタイムの会話による問題解決も試みる事が出来ます。コモンズの管理者の会話ページで聞く事も可能です。 お急ぎの際、もしくは英語に自信の無い方は、日本語のウィキペディア・チャンネル#wikipedia-jaもご利用いただけます。 |
 ちょっと役立つヒントとコツ
 間違ってしまったときに | |
| (P.S. もしよろしければ、このページに対するフィードバックをお願いします。) | ||
DVD R W 07:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Nice work!
[edit]I really like your work! It is very useful. Arthena 21:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Categorize of Image:Nishitokyocityhanabus.JPG
[edit]
How do you do, I am 103momo. Although you were categorized into Category:Nishi Tokyo Bus in Image:Nishitokyocityhanabus.JPG ,This car is not the vehicle of the Nishitokyo bus but a vehicle of the community bus "Hana Bus (ja:はなバス) " in Nishi-Tokyo City, and since it was indicated as the "Seibu bus" into the car body, I have changed a category into Category:Seibu Bus. In addition, as for the category about the Nishi-Tokyo bus, I created Category:Nishitokyo Bus. I would appreciate your favor from now on. (in Japanese, please see ja:利用者‐会話:J o#コモンズにおけるImage:Nishitokyocityhanabus.JPGのカテゴライズについて)--103momo 03:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC) Partly modified. --103momo 03:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Category:University of Science and Technology Beijing
[edit]Dear J o,
You miscategoried several images in Category:University of Science and Technology Beijing, so I'll help you correctting them. But thank you for your nice work in editting the description page of the category!
Best regards, --KeepOpera (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know Beijing in detail since I've never been there. If you find mistakes in my edit, please revise them. Thanks. --J o (talk) 12:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
北海道庁旧庁舎Category名の件ほか
[edit]はじめまして（Joさんの御名前は大阪関連の画像でよく拝見していますので、はじめましてという気がしないのですが^^）。当件、小生のノートで丁寧に説明していただき、ありがとうございます。私、Formerへの移動に異論は全く無いという意思を表明いたします。このような命名に関する経緯があるとは存ぜず、既にCategoryがあったことを調べず新規Categoryを作成したことで、Joさんには余計なお手数をおかけすることになって申し訳ございませんでした。先ほど当該画像のFormerへの移動等をCategory作成者の責任において実施いたしました。ご連絡いたします。
さて、別件でのお知らせをさせてください。小生Category:Kobe by decadeのページを作成いたしました。もしPlaces by decadeのTemplateにOsakaの名が無いことに違和感を覚えられましたら、気が向いたときにでもご修正いただければ幸いです（＾＾）。ありがとうございました。--663h (talk) 09:54, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- お返事が遅れ失礼しました。ご理解いただき幸いです。私自身は無名の投稿者のつもりでおりましたので、恐縮しています。Places by decadeの件は、建築学・史の体系的なバックグラウンドを有していないこともあり、意識していませんでした。月並みではありますが、コミュニティにはもっと詳しい方々がおられるようですから、徐々に整理・拡充が進めばいいと思います。--J o (talk) 15:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Aviation Wikiproject on Commons?
[edit]Hey mate, I've had an idea of starting an Aviation WikiProject on Commons. I have created a page at User talk:Russavia/Proposal where I hope that if other editors think this is a good idea, we can all come up with ideas, etc. Please keep all comments on that page for time being, and if you know of other editors on Commons or on other language projects who might be interested in commenting, coming up with ideas, etc, please let them know of the discussion. Perhaps you could let jawiki project and editors know? Let's see if this could be a workable project. russavia (talk) 23:58, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
|
Media companies by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Pvdkerk (talk) 13:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Copyright inspector Barnstar | |
| I just wanted to give you a quick thanks for the time you spent tagging all of these files. INeverCry 19:56, 14 October 2012 (UTC) |
こんにちは。Category:Commons-jaからCategory:Japanへいくつかの画像を移動なさったのを拝見しました。たしかにCommons-jaというカテゴリに入るべきではない画像だったと思いますが、Japan もまた人物や建築物の画像には適していないように思います。今後はたとえば建築物でしたらCategory:Buildings in Japan、できればその下の細分化されたカテゴリなどをご検討くださるとありがたいです。どうぞよろしくお願いいたします--whym (talk) 14:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- はじめまして。もちろん、おっしゃることに異論はありません。ただ今回は一点ずつ吟味する時間がなく、かといってremoveだけして万が一にも迷子状態にしてはいけないと思い、いったんJapanへ入れてあとで振り分けようとした次第です。お手数をおかけしたのであれば申し訳ございません。--J o (talk) 17:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- お返事ありがとうございます。ご承知の上で一時的な処置だったのでしたら、余計なお願いをしてしまったようで、申し訳ございません。Commons-ja は私も以前問題に気づきながら、いくつか直しただけで放置してしまっておりました。今回整理してくださって助かりました。また、申し遅れましたが、J oさんの長年に渡るカテゴリ付与の活動は大変貴重でありがたく思っております。今後ともどうぞよろしくお願いいたします。 --whym (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Copy not move
[edit]In [1], the category should've only been moved. The buses are still unidentified w/ regards to their model. Please restore the old cat. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ansan_057.JPG&curid=26955015&diff=115353129&oldid=104427311){kind=link}
Categorization
[edit]Hi, J o, I noticed that you have been classifying a lot of photos related with aircraft. Maybe you can express your opinion in my talk page or ask experienced editors (namely aviation related) to help me in this matter. I'm not having problems with anyone, just I have really great doubts about what I am doing, related with aircraft classification, and all help is welcome. Best regards --JotaCartas (talk) 04:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Pentax lenses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
--El Grafo (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:39, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Osaka Marubiru Building has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Estopedist1 (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Tokyu Hands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |