Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, JJ Georges!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

File:Woody-woodpecker-title-card.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

File:Woody-woodpecker-title-card.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, JJ Georges!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:53, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gammamilice.gif is uncategorized since 7 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:53, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bannieremilice.png is uncategorized since 19 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Zhude.jpg is uncategorized since 11 July 2009.
Image:Sun Yat-sen and Sung Qing-ling 1911 (Cropped).jpg is uncategorized since 25 July 2009.
Image:WWII-Mediterranean-v1.PNG was uncategorized on 7 October 2009.
Image:Burt Young.jpg was uncategorized on 23 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Une vie meilleure 2012.jpg was uncategorized on 4 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Daniel Craig Millenium Paris 2012.jpg was uncategorized on 4 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Céline Sallette 2012.jpg was uncategorized on 15 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bannieremilice.png

File:Bannieremilice.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Motopark (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gammamilice.gif

File:Gammamilice.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Motopark (talk) 18:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Question

Hi JJ Georges,

I am not sure what led you to ask me your question, but I will try and answer it.

There are certain fundamental, foundational rules that any community has, and anyone who wishes to contribute to that community must respect them. One of Wikimedia Commons' such rules (and a general Wikimedia rule) is that readers must be allowed to re-use all the materials here more or less freely, including for commercial purposes. It is actually part of our identity, that we create free-content resources. This is set out (in a not very readable way) at Commons:Licensing. For further reading you may want to look at Commons talk:Licensing/Explaining why Derivative Work and Commercial Use must be allowed and <http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/NC>.

Hope this helps. cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 13:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

See also http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy and the Definition of Free Cultural Works. Part of the Wikimedia Foundation's mission says it is about collecting and developing information "under a free content license". So while it ends up that what we are doing does happen to be non-commercial, that is not the purpose of why we do it. The purpose is wider than that. cheers -- pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arilang say Hi

Hi, it is very unfortunate that Time/Life refuse to let commons use those beautiful pictures. Well, since there is nothing we can do, I have come across this website:http://www.asu.edu/lib/archives/smedforeign.htm#top

an photo archives of Arizona State University, which contain many rarely seen Chinese Yan'an communist photos. Could you help me to find out if these images are in public domain or not? Arilang Arilang ^talk 20:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jose_Antonio_Primo_de_Rivera.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jose_Antonio_Primo_de_Rivera.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jose_Antonio_Primo_de_Rivera.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rastrojo _(D•ES) 20:48, 13 Septembejesto ba estar editado tarados para que no se buelban ameter con justin beiber porque soy su fan numer one ok bai mil besos a justin beiber

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mao_and_Chiang1945.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mao_and_Chiang1945.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mao_and_Chiang1945.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 22:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese soviet flag

Hi, sorry for the late reply! The Chinese Soviet Republic had only one official flag as prescribed by its Constitution. Originally stipulated as a result of the First National Congress of the Soviets in the «Outline to the Constitution of the Chinese Soviet Republic» (中华苏维埃共和国宪法大纲), 7-20 November 1931. This is the "First Theoretical Flag"; It underwent minor changes during the Second National Congress of the Soviets where it was formally adopted through an amendment to the Constitution: «Decision regarding the National Emblem, National Flag, and War Flag» (关于国徽、国旗、军旗的决定), 21-31 January 1934. This is the "Second Theoretical Flag". The "First Theoretical Flag" was described in Article 4, Chapter 8 Articles 76-78 of the «Outline to the Constitution», the National Emblem shall be the shape of the Earth as escutcheon, superimposed on top are the hammer and sickle crossing, ears of millet dexter and sinister to the bottom and sides of the Earth, a five-pointed star is located above the Earth, above which is written "中華蘇維埃共和國" (the Chinese Soviet Republic in Traditional Chinese characters), and on top of that, "全世界無產階級聯合起來啊！" (O, Proletariats of the World, Unite!); The National Flag shall be a crimson field with the Emblem superimposed. The "Second Theoretical Flag" was described as a crossed hammer and sickle superimposed on the Earth, ears of wheat dexter, ears of millet sinister, supporting the Earth to the bottom and sides, a five-pointed star above the Earth, above which are written "中華蘇維埃共和國" and on top of that, "全世界無產階級和被壓迫民族聯合起來！" (Proletariats and Oppressed Nations of the World, Unite!). The Earth sits on a plate of argent, Its outlines, features and longitudinal/latitudinal lines in azure, the hammer and sickle sable, the five-pointed star or. The National Flag is a rectangular field of crimson of ratio 3.6:5, with the Emblem superimposed. The War Flag (Second War Flag) is a rectangular field of crimson of ratio 3.6:5 with the hammer and sickle in or superimposed and centered, with a five-pointed star or and hoist. In reality, these flags were probably never manufactured as the designs were too elaborate for the poor textile manufacturing ability of those rural Soviet-controlled areas. Mao Zedong said during the First Congress that the Flag of the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army could be used as a substitute (just as the Internationale was originally used as a provisional anthem which was only later officially adopted). The Flag of the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army was a crimson field with a five-pointed star (the type with the more obtuse rays) in argent or light or ([1],Fourth Army). On the star is drawn in black paint with a traditional calligraphy brush (or sometimes sewn) either the hammer and sickle or the sickle and axe (orientation could be upright, left leaning, straight downwards, to the upper fly, et cetera; officially from the general decree of April 1930 Regarding Red Army Miliary Flag Protocols《关于红军各级军旗的规定的通令》, the First War Flag is to be the sickle and axe, this was later changed to hammer and sickle for the Second War Flag). Near its hoist is sewn a vertical white stripe, on which words could be written in black paint with a calligraphy brush (in cursive font), or spray painted with the help of paper cutouts (in serif font). Known examples are "中國工農紅軍第一方面軍" (the Chinese Workers' and Peasants' Red Army First Army, a War Flag) or "中華蘇維埃共和國中央軍事委員會" ("the Chinese Soviet Republic Central Military Committee", a state flag, Written on a Second War Flag). It was easy to manufacture, and in this way the flag needs of all departments could be satisfied. This was the First War Flag, also the substitute national flag and for everything else. The Second War Flag/substitute national flag is as described the amendment, a crimson flag, hoist white, hammer and sickle in or (upright, left leaning, right leaning, and other orientations), and a five-pointed star top left. (Location where the First Congress was held, Second War Flag seen, Second War Flag) [2] and [3] were taken at the hall where the Second Congress was held, the Second War Flag and official National Flag could be seen, in its center is the national emblem. Hammer and axe example for a propaganda opera corps. These two are seals for the Central Executive Committee and the Central Military Committee, the left one appears on this flag for the Central Executive Committee. The Second set of national and war flags were in use until the dissolution of the Chinese Soviet Republic and the reorganization of the Chinese Workers' and Peasants' Red Army into the National Revolutionary Army 22 September 1937 as part of the terms for the Second Nationalist-Communist Cooperation. Second National Flag (top), notice the new wheat sinister millet dexter arrangement; Second War Flag bottom (when assigned to specific departments for civil and state or divisions for the army, a white stripe would be sewn on near the hoist). I have never seen this flag anywhere else other than from the Flags of the World website (the words 中共 means the Chinese Communists not the Chinese Soviets 中蘇 or Soviet areas 蘇區 which would be the common way to refer to these areas). Well I hope that helps a bit, sorry that I wrote so much cluttering your talk page! --Shibo77 09:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, so basically there were four flags. First War, Second War, First State, Second State.

These three are roughly the same, according to law, «General Decree Regarding Red Army Miliary Flag Protocols», it should be the sickle&axe rather than the hammer&sickle. The unofficial First War Flag was simply a red banner used from the Army's founding in August 1927 until September 1927. Its orientation wasn't codified, (or was, but disregarded). The white stripe identifies its exact use. "the Chinese Soviet Republic" (left), apparently for the government of a township subdivision (centre), "the Chinese Workers' and Peasants' Red Army" (right). These were used well into the Long March (revolutionary art depicting the Long March would feature this flag), so I'd assume they were in use at least to Yan'an, October 1936, probably even until the Red Army's formal reorganisation in 22 September 1937. They were probably quite varied in design, which could account for the star with the outline in black in the centre picture.

First War Flag (also substitute State Flag) Designed September 1927; first used during the Autumn Harvest Uprising, 11 September 1927 ref; codified April 1930; used until dissolution 22 September 1937??

First War Flag (also substitute State Flag) Designed September 1927; first used during the Autumn Harvest Uprising, 11 September 1927 ^ref; codified April 1930; used until dissolution 22 September 1937??
First War Flag (also substitute State Flag)

First War Flag (also substitute State Flag)
First War Flag (also substitute State Flag)

These two are the same, orientation of the hammer&sickle and their exact shapes were not codified. Codified March 1931, per «Styles and Credentials for the Crimson Banner of the Soviets and Organisations of the Masses» (苏维埃和群众团体红军旗帜印信式样). Apparently still used February 1934 in the Second Congress, probably coexisted with the First War Flag, not sure when it stopped being used but I'd guess around the time of the Long March, October 1934:

Second War Flag (also substitute State Flag) Codified March 1931; coexisted with the First War Flag??, used until October 1934??
Second War Flag (also substitute State Flag)

The one on the left is correct except the Earth should be outlined in blue. The right flag's Earth on the left would be correct:

Second State Flag (per «Decision regarding the National Emblem, National Flag, and War Flag», 21-31 January 1934 until dissolution 22 September 1937)
Second State Flag (per «Decision regarding the National Emblem, National Flag, and War Flag», 21-31 January 1934 until dissolution 22 September 1937)

The First State Flag (per «Outline to the Constitution of the Chinese Soviet Republic» (中华苏维埃共和国宪法大纲), 7-20 November 1931 until «Decision», 21-31 January 1934) is just the Second State Flag above left with the ears of wheat on the right replaced with millet, and the motto changed to "全世界無產階級聯合起來啊！" (O, Proletariats of the World, Unite!).

The Communist Party of China's flag only came into its current form 11 October 1949 per 《关于入党仪式所用党旗尺寸的规定》. Before that it was the similar but replaced with the sickle&axe, codified 28 April 1942. And before that it was not standardised and on many occasions they would simply copy the CPSU-Bolsheviks' or the Soviet Union's flags. This looks like a direct copy from the Soviet flag, so I suppose it could be from the pre-1942 era (contemporaneous with the Chinese Soviet Republic). Cheers! --Shibo77 00:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georges Marchais.JPG

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ русский ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ +/−

--feydey ^(talk) 08:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Georges_Marchais.JPG

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Georges_Marchais.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

feydey ^(talk) 08:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marchais, Poher et Monnerville

Bonjour,

même si je comprends les problèmes légaux, c'est assez désespérant. Je ne sais pas si les ayant-droits/auteurs que j'ai sollicités vont accepter que les emm... à nouveau avec ce formulaire (d'autant que les réponses que j'avais eues étaient on ne peut plus claires et sans ambiguïtés !). Avec ça, j'ignore à quelle vitesse on va parvenir à résoudre les problèmes d'iconographie de wikipédia. Pour ma part, cela me refroidit un peu. Cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 15:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Si vous ne vouliez pas avoir ce genre de problèmes (des autorisations ambigües et inaceptables pour une utilisation sur Wikimedia Commons), il fallait préalablement demander d'autres avis par exemple sur Commons:Bistro ou encore prendre la peine de lire Commons:OTRS/fr.

Faute d'autorisation, ces images seront supprimées, mais elles pourront être immédiatement restaurées à réception d'une autorisation correcte.

Cordialement.--Bapti ✉ 15:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Le souci, c'est que les autorisations n'ont rien d'"ambigu", la réponse étant tout à fait claire (je vous demanderai donc de bien vouloir laisser ces images tranquilles en l'attente de la réponse des intéressés). Je me dis que je n'aurais même pas du vous forwarder le message concernant les photos de Monnerville et Poher, attendu qu'elles sont là depuis plusieurs semaines et que personne n'y a vu malice. Ca m'apprendra à faire preuve de transparence... J'ai juste peur que les ayant-droits ne soient terrifiés par ce laborieux formulaire et/ou que le Sénat ne daigne pas me répondre une deuxième fois. Je viens d'avoir un accord d'ayant-droit pour les photos de 5 personnalités (dont Jacques Chaban-Delmas) mais je craint que l'ayant-droit ne comprenne pas le formulaire. Comprenez le découragement qui peut vous prendre quand vous avez laborieusement cherché durant plusieurs jours des images pour le bien de la "communauté", que vous avez reçu un accord explicite, et que vous vous heurtez à ce genre d'argument bureaucratique... Cela induit une certaine fatigue morale. cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 16:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Un courriel qui n'est pas ambigüe, c'est un message qu'on ne peut comprendre que d'une seule manière. Les autorisations que vous avez obtenues, outre qu'elles ne sont pas acceptables pour Wikimedia Commons (pas de travaux dérivés, pas d'utilisation commerciale), se comprennent de plusieurs façons, plus ou moins restrictives.

Quant aux photos de Monnerville et Poher, quelqu'un aurait bien fini par voir qu'il y avait un problème. Ce n'est guère respectueux de l'esprit du projet d'importer des contenus dont vous n'êtes pas l'auteur en espérant masquer cela le plus longtemps possible.

Encore une fois, si vous ne vouliez pas avoir "une certaine fatigue morale", il aurait été judicieux de demander AVANT tout contact quel type d'accord est nécessaire pour utiliser une image sur Wikimedia Commons. Ça n'a rien de bureaucratique : des centaines de personnes ont déjà été capables de remplir cette formalité du premier coup.--Bapti ✉ 07:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'avais aucune intention de "masquer" quoi que ce soit, puisque j'ignorais qu'il y avait un quelconque problème. Avant de me taper sur les doigts, tenez compte du fait que je me suis donné la peine d'aller péniblement chercher des photos, de déranger les ayants-droits, et que ceux-ci m'ont aimablement donné leur permission. Dire que je ne respecte pas l'éthique du projet alors que je me donne justement du mal pour celui-ci, c'est quelque peu exagéré. Par contre, attendu qu'il existe une licence Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported, il serait nécessaire que j'ai un formulaire adapté à celle-ci et excluant les usages commerciaux, plutôt que celui qui m'a été envoyé (à moins que ce ne soit pas adapté à commons ? Les réponses sur le bistro ne sont justement pas très claires). Cela permettrait de ne pas effrayer les auteurs ou les ayant-droits. JJ Georges (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ma réponse rebondissait sur le "Ca m'apprendra à faire preuve de transparence..." qui laisse entendre qu'il serait préférable d'importer ce qu'on veut dans son coin en espérant que personne ne le remarque.

Oui, je peux comprendre qu'il est pénible de se rendre compte que les autorisations obtenues ne servent à rien car elles ne sont pas adaptées sur Wikimedia Commons. Mais ce n'est pas de ma faute si vous n'avez pas demandé conseil avant d'entreprendre quoi que ce soit dans ce domaine très très compliqué.

Contrairement à ce que vous semblez avoir compris, il n'est pas possible d'avoir sur Commons une image placée sous une licence excluant les usages commerciaux. Il est néanmoins possible d'avoir une image sous double licence (voire triple licence et plus si affinités) dont certaines sont restrictives (comme la licence Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported) pour peu que l'une au moins autorise les usages commerciaux. Donc ça ne résout en rien votre problème : si l'ayant-droit ne donne pas une autorisation claire et précise pour utiliser son image sous une licence acceptable sur Wikimedia Commons, l'image sera supprimée.--Bapti ✉ 16:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, mais c'est particulièrement emmerdatoire. Pour ma part, je ne m'en serais même pas occupé si je n'avais eu soudain l'étrange lubie de mettre des photos de Georges Marchais et Jacques Chaban-Delmas. Je suis en train de voir avec les ayant-droits (j'espère ne pas avoir trop saoûlé l'auteur de la photo sur Marchais, qui était pourtant bien disposé au départ : j'essaie de résoudre la question avec une version en très basse résolution de la photo, impossible à reproduire dans un cadre commercial). Pour le Sénat, je n'aurais pas de réponse, à mon avis, avant la fin de la semaine prochaine (la bureaucratie est ce qu'elle est, et l'expression "train de sénateur" a un sens bien connu). Pour les photos qui viennent du château de machin-chose, la propriétaire est d'accord, mais il faut d'une part que je fasse en échange un article sur wikipédia sur son château (c'est un monument classé, donc pas de souci) d'autre part que je lui apprenne à faire un copié-collé sur internet pour qu'elle renvoie elle-même le formulaire. Bref, je ne suis pas prêt de retenter des trucs pareils. JJ Georges (talk) 16:48, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, toutes ces questions sont « emmerdatoire(s) », mais Wikimedia Commons et plus généralement les projets Wikimedia entendent respecter scrupuleusement les droits d'auteurs.

Si une autorisation est envoyée sur OTRS, merci de mettre le modèle {{OTRS pending}} plutôt qu'un blabla fait-main : cela facilite le suivi pour tout le monde. Cordialement--Bapti ✉ 11:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

heu, je crois que vous avez fait une gaffe sur Georges Marchais. Si j'avais mis une version de moins bonne qualité, c'est précisément suite à une négociation avec l'auteur (et suite justement à des conseils sur le bistro). La mise en ligne d'une version basse résolution est tout à fait volontaire, et destinée à ne pas léser les droits de l'auteur, qui demeure propriétaire de la version de bonne qualité et cède la version basse qualité (impossible à réutiliser commercialement). Je ne voudrais pas qu'il estime que j'ai été déloyal avec lui. Il faudrait donc que vous restauriez la version basse résolution. Pour le côté "emmerdatoire", je comprends tout à fait la nécessité de protéger les droits d'auteur : ce qui m'a un peu agacé, c'est de me faire enguirlander alors que j'ai passé un temps appréciable à chercher des images, en toute bonne foi (j'aurais certes du prendre le temps de tout lire en détail mais le temps de chacun n'est pas forcément extensible, et la recherche des images, à laquelle je me livrais pour la première fois, est déjà très chronophage en soi; errare humanum est). Cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 12:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Le photographe n'a pas jugé utile (pour le moment) de préciser que son autorisation ne portait que sur la version timbre-poste de File:Georges Marchais.JPG. En attendant une précision de sa part (puisque la porte a été laissée ouverte pour préciser son autorisation), il est normal de mettre en ligne la version de meilleure qualité du fichier. Si l'autorisation ne porte effectivement que sur une version, il faudra purger les précédentes versions de l'historique, et non se contenter d'importer une version de moins bonne qualité--Bapti ✉ 15:22, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Je laisse le photographe voir avec vous. En attendant, je vais forwarder notre échange à l'adresse mail. Pour les deux dernières photos que j'ai uploadées (ainsi que celles de Devos, Chaban-Delmas, Eve Ruggieri, Roland Dumas, Nadine de Rothschild), leur propriétaire m'a envoyé le formulaire rempli sur un fichier word en pièce jointe, que je vous ai fait suivre tout à l'heure (avec l'adresse email de ma correspondante, pour que vous puissiez la contacter directement si vous le souhaitez) JJ Georges (talk) 08:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

L'adresse email de votre correspondante n'est pas indispensable pour que nous puissions la contacter, mais bien pour que nous puissions l'authentifier. Un courriel d'autorisation de photo du Sénat ne saurait venir d'une adresse du type toto [at] hotmail.com par exemple.

Sinon, il est inutile de m'envoyer une message à chaque fois que vous envoyez un courriel : si l'autorisation est correcte, elle sera validée, sinon vous recevrez une réponse expliquant les problèmes à résoudre. Et si vous importez correctement l'image avec {{OTRS pending}}, personne ne supprimera l'image, sauf si évidemment, elle n'a pas été validée quelques semaines plus tard (mais chaque image peut être restaurée : vous n'aurez en aucun cas à les réimporter).--Bapti ✉ 16:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autorisations - "Photographe du château de Mongenan"

Bonjour, est-ce que vous pouvez me confirmer que les autorisations correspondantes à ces photographies ont été envoyées à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (ou permissions-commons-fr) ? Merci d'avance. --Eusebius (talk) 13:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaston Monnerville en 1947.JPG

Bonjour,

Le crédit « Please take note that, although the image can be modified, the French Senate would like the "Archives du Sénat" mention to remain visible » n'a aucune raison d'être sur Wikimedia Commons. Indépendamment des souhaits de l'auteur ou ayant-droit, il n'est pas judicieux de vouloir décourager ceux qui voudraient améliorer cette image en retirant cette horreur.

Merci d'avance.--Bapti ✉ 21:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

je n'ajoute pas cette mention pour le plaisir (ce serait du masochisme), c'est simplement quelque chose qui m'a été demandé par les archives du Sénat (voir leur premier message). Ils ne sont pas contre les modifications (sinon ils n'auraient pas renvoyé l'autorisation) mais ils souhaitent que la mention reste visible. Je ne cherche pas à comprendre, simplement à respecter le souhait de cette respectable institution, qui fait à commons l'honneur de lui confier toutes ces images. Au plan personnel, je suis évidemment d'accord pour dire que la mention de l'origine induite par la licence suffit amplement. cordialement, JJ Georges (talk)

Bonjour,

Qu'ils souhaitent que chaque personne qui ré-utilisent ces images leur offre une glace à la fraise, c'est leur droit, mais ça n'a pas à figurer sur Commons. On se contente (et c'est déjà beaucoup) de donner toutes les indications possibles pour ré-utiliser l'image (légende, auteur, licence, éventuellement confirmation de la licence via OTRS).

Bonne continuation.--Bapti ✉ 07:30, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kim_Jong_il.jpg

File:Kim_Jong_il.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maurice Arreckx.jpg

Bonjour,

Comme expliqué précédemment, merci d'ajouter {{OTRS pending}} sur la page de description des images quand une autorisation est en attente de traitement sur le système OTRS. Cela facilite le boulot de tout le monde.

Cordialement--Bapti ✉ 17:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juliette Binoche 1985.jpg et File:Céline Dion 1986.jpg

Bonjour,

Tu vas encore dire que je t'embêtes, mais à quoi rime ce type d'edits. Pourrais-tu commenter tes modifications (en français, en anglais ou autre, peu importe) dans ce genre de cas non trivials en particulier ? Merci d'avance.--Bapti ✉ 20:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

C'est tout simplement pour que ça soit lisible dans toutes les langues, puisqu'il y a un modèle. JJ Georges (talk) 08:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Visiblement, tu as mal compris : le fait de ne mettre qu'un modèle (en l'occurrence {{Own}}) dans le champ "Source" du modèle {{Information}} ne rend pas la ligne plus lisible dans toutes les langues que si tu mets du texte avec un modèle. En l'occurrence, sur File:Juliette Binoche 1985.jpg, s'affiche à cet endroit « http://www.mandor.fr/ (Own work) » en anglais, « http://www.mandor.fr/ (Travail personnel) » en français ou encore « http://www.mandor.fr/ (Eigene Arbeit) » en allemand. Donc supprimer l'url en source retire une précision sans améliorer la lisibilité de l'ensemble ;)--Bapti ✉ 09:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chiara Mastroianni.jpg, File:Line Renaud Loulou Gasté.jpg & File:Gérard Oury Michèle Morgan.jpg

Bonjour,

On suppose qu'une autorisation via OTRS porte sur l'image telle qu'elle est au moment de l'envoi du courriel. Donc l'autorisation pour ces trois images portent sur la version en timbre-poste : si tu importes une version de meilleure qualité, il faut une autorisation spécifique. Le photographe peut tout à fait accepter de placer ces petites photos sous licence libre mais toujours garder les versions grand format pour les vendre.

Cordialement--Bapti ✉ 12:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

J'ai malheureusement le sentiment de pisser dans un violon, mais pourrais-tu respecter les usages pour remplir la page de description ? Dans le formulaire de base, il suffit de copier la syntaxe d'une des images que tu as déjà importé et de l'adapter...

Dans le même ordre d'idée, pourrais-tu stp ajouter une date précise aussi souvent que possible. « années 2000 », c'est très vague, alors qu'il y a sûrement moyen d'avoir l'année exacte du cliché sans que cela ne nécessite un surplus de travail inaceptable.

Merci d'avance.--Bapti ✉ 14:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis peut-être totalement ignare ou bouché, mais j'avoue ne pas voir où est le problème ou, du moins, ne pas comprendre comment je pourrais faire autrement. J'ai fait un essai : est-ce que c'est bon comme ça ? Quant à l'imprécision des dates, je la regrette, mais elle correspond à ce qui est indiqué à la source où je les trouve. A savoir, en grande partie, la page facebook du photographe qui m'a autorisé - et même encouragé - à y puiser. Si je peux avoir une indication de date plus précise, je la mettrai, mais c'est un peu difficile de demander audit photographe de se souvenir de l'année précise où chaque photo a été prise. Pour certaines, je peux faire une recherche -par exemple, chercher quelle année Alain Chabat a présenté les césars avec Monica Bellucci- mais ce sera en fonction de mon temps. JJ Georges (talk) 15:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Et bien j'avoue ne pas comprendre ce que tu ne comprends pas. Certes, File:Anne Brochet Cannes.jpg est mieux que les précédentes, mais ce serait parfait d'appliquer directement la syntaxe précédemment indiquée.

Concernant les dates, d'autres contributeurs se tapent ce fastidieux boulot. Certes, Wikimedia Commons est un wiki collaboratif, mais c'est un peu surprenant de ne faire le travail qu'à moitié. Et je suppose que le photographe en question serait tout à fait disposé à te donner les dates précises des clichés. Ça ne coûte rien de lui demandé en tout cas.--Bapti ✉ 14:31, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Avoue que c'est quand même franchement décourageant. Je me casse le c** à te laisser des messages d'explications pour que tu importes correctement tes images et non seulement tu les importes par centaine (merci pour le boulot...) sans tenir compte des remarques précédemment faites. Il n'y a rien d'urgent : mieux vaut importer correctement les photos que de vouloir griller la moitié des étapes. Merci d'avance pour ta considération à l'égard des autres contributions.--Bapti ✉ 21:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vu que je viens de me taper ces 200 images, je te signale qu'il manque une autorisation concernant File:Olivier Gourmet Cannes.jpg et File:Charlotte Gainsbourg Césars.jpg.--Bapti ✉ 23:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hé bien désolé; je pensais avoir fait des efforts assez considérables pour mettre en forme toutes ces présentations après l'upload massif via commonist. Pour les liens vers les articles, j'avoue avoir tout simplement manqué de patience et j'ai fini par abandonner ce détail en me disant que je le ferai plus tard. A mon humble avis, c'est tout de même relativement secondaire comparé au très gros apport que représentent toutes ces photos. JJ Georges (talk) 07:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai pas dit que tu ne faisais pas d'efforts, mais je constate que mes messages et les multiples corrections effectuées par plusieurs contributeurs n'y font rien : tu répètes systématiquement les mêmes erreurs. Par exemple, pour une description en français, on ajoute {{fr|La description en français.}} ou encore on met == {{int:filedesc}} == avant le modèle {{Information}}. Et je ne te parle même pas des « 2000s » au lieu de {{other date|s|2000}}, et encore moins d'ajouter les dates précises. Importer correctement 200 images n'a rien de secondaire : certes, ça prend plus de temps sur le moment (et encore, il suffirait que tu copies une bonne foi pour toute la syntaxe idéale, par exemple ici et ça irait presque tout aussi vite) mais les images n'en seront que plus utilisables à la fois sur Wikipédia et hors des projets Wikimedia. Merci d'avance.--Bapti ✉ 10:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mass upload

I just want to point out to you (in case you don't know) that there are tools to enable you to do mass uploads to Commons, such as Commonist. Tabercil (talk) 16:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a great tool. Helps me immensely when I need to upload a lot of pics at once. Tabercil (talk) 16:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've used one of these mass upload tools already, given the presense of File:Virginie Ledoyen Cannes 2000.jpg. But do you have all the fields properly filled in? That Ledoyen upload is missing description and author information. Tabercil (talk) 13:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to, but don't have the time... just doing a quick check online with my morning caffeine in hand before heading off to work. If there's anything left by the time I get back home 10 hours later, I'll cheerfully tackle it. <G> Tabercil (talk) 13:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll probably do just that - if anything to try and see what celebs aren't in their own category, then make one for them (e.g., Category:Annie Girardot). Tabercil (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Une bonne fois pour toute...

Bonjour,

Au risque de me répéter (mais tu as déjà fait quelques efforts donc ne désespérons pas...) et sans remettre en cause ton travail, pourrais-tu une bonne fois pour toi importer correctement les images de GB ?

Ce photographe n'a jamais placé ces documents sous double licence CC-BY-SA / GFDL : il n'est pas normal qu'il faille systématiquement corriger le tir (et remettre les infos au bon endroit). Il suffirait pourtant de copier/coller un modèle correct dans le formulaire de téléchargement.

De même, cela t'a déjà été demandé : il faudrait légender correctement les images (en précisant par exemple la manifestation et l'année dans le champ description). Enfin, afin d'assurer la traçabilité de l'image, il serait bon d'ajouter l'url où tu as prises l'image dans le champ source.

Encore une fois, faire tout ça ne te prend absolument aucun temps supplémentaire si tu t'organises correctement. Mais ça rendra encore plus utile ton travail sur Commons sans obliger d'autres contributeurs à réparer tes erreurs.

Merci d'avance--Bapti ✉ 14:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS : Merci d'insérer la mention "[Ticket#2010010910017329]" en objet des autorisations que tu lui demandes de faire suivre.

Bonjour,

ok, pour la licence, je ferai plus attention. Je les ai tout simplement confondues par manque de familiarité avec les sigles. J'avoue avoir du mal à m'y repérer entre cc-by-3.0 et cc-by-sa-3.0. Pour les légendes, c'est une question de temps, et je pensais repasser après pour compléter (de même que je mets progressivement à jour les dates pour les photos où elles manquent, en interrogeant le photographe).

Par contre, quel est le problème pour http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Georges_Lautner.jpg ? Il n'a pas inclus cette url dans le formulaire ? Ca fait deux fois que j'essaie de mettre celle-là. cordialement JJ Georges (talk) 17:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concernant File:Georges Lautner.jpg, la personne a indiqué ne pas être l'auteur de ce fichier. Il ne sert de toute façon strictement à rien de ré-importer une image précédemment supprimée : le cliché peut être remis en ligne directement par un administrateur si cela est justifié.--Bapti ✉ 14:02, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georges Lautner.jpg

Bonjour,

Le photographe a envoyé le formulaire et il lui a été répondu ceci : "Nous ne pouvons valider cette autorisation puisque rien ne permet en l'état de confirmer que vous êtes l'auteur de ce fichier. Où cette image aurait-elle été publiée auparavant ?" Du coup, il est franchement refroidi, y compris pour confier d'autres photos... Que veut dire ce message ? Il s'agit d'un photographe qui confie un cliché personnel, donc à quoi rime le fait de lui demander où l'image a été publiée ? (en l'occurrence, c'était sur son profil facebook). cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Il n'y a aucun message subliminal : ce courriel se termine par une question auquel il suffirait que le photographe réponde car il n'est pas possible de valider une image sans savoir d'où elle vient.--Bapti ✉ 17:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ca n'a aucun sens, à mon avis. S'il confirme par la présente être l'auteur du cliché, je ne vois pas pourquoi le lui demander à nouveau, d'autant qu'il ne me semble pas que cela ait été fait avec les autres auteurs de clichés que j'ai pu trouver. La question, et surtout le ton très maladroit sur lequel elle était formulée ("Où cette image aurait-elle été publiée auparavant ?"), laissent entendre que le gars était soupçonné de vouloir indûment s'attribuer la paternité d'un cliché. Je ne m'étonne pas qu'il l'ait mal pris. C'est franchement bête, car il a plusieurs clichés (nettement meilleurs que celui de Lautner, d'ailleurs) qui valaient le coup d'être utilisés. Je vais voir si je peux rattraper le coup. JJ Georges (talk) 17:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ce qui est franchement bête, c'est le temps systématiquement perdu avec les autorisations que tu envoies pour rectifier le tir, comprendre qu'est-ce qui est concerné, d'où viennent ces dossiers mal-ficelés, etc. Ce qui est maladroit et n'a aucun sens, c'est de faire compléter une autorisation quand ça n'est pas nécessaire : nous n'avons rien d'autre à faire que de demander des précisions quand nous n'avons aucun élément pour valider ou non une autorisation. Si une image n'a jamais été publiée auparavant, il n'y a normalement pas besoin de passer par une autorisation via OTRS : il suffit que le photographe se crée un compte et importe lui-même la photo sur Wikimedia Commons (ou que tu le fasses pour lui s'il préfère). Il déclare en important l'image qu'il s'agit de son travail et on suppose sa bonne foi jusqu'à preuve du contraire. Quand l'image a été publiée auparavant (comme c'est le cas des autres photos que tu importes quoique dans le cas de GB, malgré des demandes répétées, tu n'as que rarement indiqué la source originelle) ou qu'il y a un doute sur l'identité du photographe (par exemple pour les clichés du Sénat), il faut passer par une autorisation via OTRS.--Bapti ✉ 17:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

S'il fallait que je demande aux photographes de se créer des comptes et de faire le travail eux-mêmes, ils ne l'auraient jamais fait, et on n'aurait pas les 300 et quelques photos de Georges Biard que je suis allé pêcher. En outre, j'ai toujours indiqué la source (travail personnel). Bref, là, le gars a reçu un message insultant disant que son autorisation était refusée car on le soupçonnait d'être un menteur. C'est brillant. De toutes manières, j'ai encore une quinzaine de photos de GB à mettre et puis j'arrête les frais pour le moment car j'en ai un peu marre de bosser pour me faire engueuler. JJ Georges (talk) 18:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Par définition, toutes les photos sont du travail personnel : quand l'image a été publiée auparavant, la source est l'url (par exemple) de cette première publication.

Je n'ai jamais écrit que tu devais demander au photographe de faire le travail eux-mêmes : « il suffit que le photographe se crée un compte et importe lui-même la photo sur Wikimedia Commons (ou que tu le fasses pour lui s'il préfère) ». Quand à dire que le message est insultant, je comprends mieux pourquoi tu prends la moindre critique de ton travail comme une attaque personnelle : le courriel ne fait qu'indiquer qu'il n'est pas possible de valider l'autorisation et demande des précisions.

Désolé si tu as l'impression de te faire « engueulé » sur Wikimedia Commons, mais il y a de quoi trouver décourageant de te voir répéter plusieurs fois les mêmes erreurs, pourtant simples à éviter (même si tu as dernièrement fait des efforts sur plusieurs points, ce que je salue une nouvelle fois). Bonne continuation quand même.--Bapti ✉ 20:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lionel Jospin 2001.jpg

File:Lionel Jospin 2001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Martin H. (talk) 12:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Piel que habito Cannes 2011.jpg

I'm guessing the answer is probably not, but do you have a higher resolution version of this pic available? I'd like to crop it down to focus on just the key people at the front but working from the current pic would result in an end image not much bigger than a kernel of corn... Tabercil (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not looking for any specific person - I just want to crop the top half of it plus everything to the right of Jean Paul Gaultier, as well as straighten it. The problem is if I do that with the current image, I end up with a pic that's 523x292 which is about too small to be really useful. Tabercil (talk) 23:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:Zhang Ziyi Cannes 2011.jpg

It would seem that you have mislabeled this image. Any chance you can have it moved? It's actually an actress named Li Bingbing. See this, this, this, etc. Nymf (talk) 10:47, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. Looks like an administrator just fixed it :-) Nymf (talk) 18:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Courriels de Georges BIARD

Bonjour,

J'imagine que c'est vous qui préparez les autorisations que Georges BIARD envoie ensuite sur OTRS. Serait-il possible, comme cela a été demandé à maintes reprises, d'insérer la mention "[Ticket#2011030110017945]" dans l'objet du courriel, de sorte à en faciliter grandement le traitement ?

Merci d'avance.--Bapti ✉ 15:04, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

pas de souci, puisque c'est effectivement moi qui lui prépare tout. Mais il faudrait juste que sache quel numéro insérer dans l'objet ? Je veux bien que vous m'indiquiez comment faire. Pour Olivier Strecker, il a l'air ~~un peu~~ totalement dépassé par l'interface, donc pour cette fois je pense qu'il faudra procéder via formulaire. Je vais essayer de l'aider un peu pour les prochaines fois (il a uploadé deux photos lui-même, je ne comprends pas pourquoi il n'y arrive plus, mais j'essaierai de voir). cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, il faut insérer la mention "[Ticket#2011030110017945]" dans l'objet du courriel, comme indiqué ci-dessus.--Bapti ✉ 15:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Avec toujours le même numéro ? (pardon, mais je ne connais pas le système de numérotation des tickets). JJ Georges (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oui. Vous noterez que le numéro de ticket est toujours le même depuis le début de cette année.--Bapti ✉ 15:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C'est bon, il me file les clés de son compte pour que je fasse la manip à sa place. En vérifiant les IP sur le bistro (où il a posté lui-même un message) on peut facilement vérifier que nous sommes deux personnes différentes. Alors, je fais comment ? JJ Georges (talk) 16:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personne n'ira vérifier les IPs de ce compte s'il ne s'agit pas d'un vandale. Et cela n'a de toute façon rien de problématique que vous soyez sur la même IP du moment que vous vous connectez avec ses identifiants avec son accord.--Bapti ✉ 16:14, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS : Un dummy edit est une édition mineure (par exemple retirer le modèle {{OTRS pending}})

Je me permets de vous relancer puisque ce n'est toujours pas le cas : serait-il possible d'insérer la mention "[Ticket#2012010510013998]" (le numéro de ticket a changé pour l'année 2012) dans l'objet du courriel, de sorte à en faciliter grandement le traitement ? Merci d'avance.--Bapti ✉ 15:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS : Les titres de films ou d'émissions se mettent en italiques et non entre guillemets.

Pour information, je vous ai ajouté le statut "patrouilleur automatique" pour que vos modifications soient désormais automatiquement marquées comme surveillées (et non à relire). Bonne continuation.--Bapti ✉ 16:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belle photo

Votre File:Jean_Dujardin_Cannes_2011.jpg est une des plus belles photos prises par un utilisateurs de Wikipedia d'une personne vivante que j'ai jamais vu. La plupart des photographes seulement vendre leurs photos à des magazines. Merci pour l'ajouter à Wikipédia. (S'il vous plaît pardonnez mon mauvais français.) 65.9.234.126 21:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment : I'll inform the picture's author. (I didn't take it, just selected it and uploaded it with the photographer's permission). JJ Georges (talk) 22:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Khieu Samphan 1978.jpg

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erich Honecker 1981 cropped.jpg

File:Erich Honecker 1981 cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

178.2.59.234 15:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erich Honecker 1981 cropped.jpg

Hi JJ Georges, cropping or retouching an image from somebody else, does not make you the author. I have therefore corrected your wrong authorship entry. --Túrelio (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, my bad, I worked too quickly. JJ Georges (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice!

I love the photo you uploaded of Julien Doré. Just beautiful. Thank you! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 04:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mika NRJ Music Awards 2012.jpg

File:Mika NRJ Music Awards 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

187.158.249.72 01:53, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rossy de Palma Cannes 2009 1.jpg

File:Rossy de Palma Cannes 2009 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:51, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vanessa Hudgens 2012 Paris.jpg

File:Vanessa Hudgens 2012 Paris.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kürschner (talk) 07:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

	Hello, JJ Georges. You have new messages at INeverCry's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Watch those Vanessa Hudgens images, and let me know if User:Ro Cachins does anything like this again. It looks like he may have had some idea to switch the image of Vanessa he had taken from the internet with yours. INeverCry 23:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tintin and Haddock mural (cropped).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Tintin and Haddock mural (cropped).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 13:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norodom Sihanouk.JPG

File:Norodom Sihanouk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Odessey (talk) 11:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bien le bonjour, Etes vous sur que la photo de Johnny signant des authogaphes sur l'emission Champs Elysée est bien la votre ??

File:Sylvie Vartan Cabourg 2011.jpg

File:Sylvie Vartan Cabourg 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mytsie (talk) 09:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parlement européen Strasbourg 2012.jpg

File:Parlement européen Strasbourg 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.61.133.39 17:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NRJ Music Awards 2013

Please, upload pictures of One Direction, Alicia Keys and Taylor Swift on the NRJ Music Awards 2013 :)! They will be really helpful 201.211.9.13 22:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inna 2011.jpg

File:Inna 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 00:42, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

suppression d'une photographie

Bonjour,

Serait-il possible de supprimer la photographie de Mr Biard prise au festival de Cabourg que vous avez publié et qui est associée à l'acteur Jérémie Elkaïm dans wikipedia. Cordialement,

Bonjour,

Non, il n'est pas possible de supprimer cette photographie qui a été gracieusement offerte par son auteur, attendu qu'elle ne viole aucun droit à l'image. Bien cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 06:27, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jérémie Elkaim.jpg

File:Jérémie Elkaim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dereckson (talk) 10:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour

Avez vous une photo de moi lors des derniers césars. Cyril Mennegun césras du premier film. Si c'est le cas pourriez vous l'ajouter à la page de la 38ème cérémonie? Bien à vous Merci Cyril Mennegun

File:Alain Delon 2012.jpg

File:Alain Delon 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

81.164.33.102 21:33, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gérard Majax.jpg

File:Gérard Majax.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 22:34, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you consider going through the COM:OTRS process, I have hope that if what you've said on the deletion discussion is true they should restore it. I have attempted to file undeletion request here but it was declined (I think that it was done wrongly, but it's easier to go through OTRS in this case). If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is idiotic. What should I do, forward the email exchange to the otrs mail address, or copy/paste it on the link you gave me ? JJ Georges (talk) 10:45, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Also please reply here, otherwise it's difficult to follow. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 10:52, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just found those old mails (the exchange was more than 3-years old, but luckily I had kept the messages) and forwarded them to OTRS. Hope it helps... JJ Georges (talk) 15:42, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:HsinchuCity.png

File:HsinchuCity.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Akira123 (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mehdi Sadoun.jpg

File:Mehdi Sadoun.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

109.208.209.139 16:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catalina Denis.jpg

File:Catalina Denis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

81.57.5.103 13:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mylene Jampanoi 2011.png

File:Mylene Jampanoi 2011.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.97.253.5 10:24, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Aishwarya Rai Cannes 2013.jpg

And also:

File:Aishwarya Rai Cannes.jpg

Yours sincerely, —SpacemanSpiff 07:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this, I don't know how these two files crept into that category, some error on my part when I was tagging files for speedy and categorizing them for later deletion I think. I'll fix it. —SpacemanSpiff 07:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinault Hayek.jpg

File:Pinault Hayek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

91.134.65.79 05:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ola Rapace 2012.jpg

File:Ola Rapace 2012.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—SpacemanSpiff 03:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

photo salon du chocolat 2013 Hapsatou Sy

Bonjour, J'ai constaté que les 2 photos ci-après ont pour descriptif : "Hapsatou Sy au défilé de mode du salon du chocolat", or il ne s'agit pas d'Hapsatou Sy, Cordialement.

Oups, au temps pour moi !

En plus, Hapsatou Sy est noire... L'auteur de la photo avait commis une erreur de nommage et moi ensuite j'ai uploadé sans vérifier. Ca m'apprendra ! Merci JJ Georges (talk) 17:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jacquet aux César 2014

Salut. Dis-moi, tu n'aurais pas pris en photo Luc Jacquet lors des César 2014, par hasard ? Parce qu'on n'a aucune photo de lui sur Commons... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, tant pis. Merci pour la réponse - même si je n'ai pas compris pourquoi tu avais écrit « aucun des deux » ;-) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Expendables 2 Paris Poster.jpg

File:Expendables 2 Paris Poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Flickrworker (talk) 21:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elodie FONTAN

Bonjour monsieur JJ Georges

Je suis jean Claude Fontan, papa d'elodie Fontan et chargé de la communication de ma fille, de ses photos officielles et gestionnaire de cette page depuis plusieurs années,

Ma fille et moi avons, constaté que vous avez ajouté une photo d'elle prise à l'occasion d'une avant première d'Enghien dont l'auteur est mr Georges Biard

En bas, vous avez constaté la présence de sa photo officielle, ainsi que d'autres sur les sites https://www.facebook.com/elodiefontanofficiel , .http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0284869/ et http://www.actricesdefrance.org/filmos/F/Elodie_Fontan.html ces éléments sont joint pour authentifier notre demande.

Ma fille souhaiterai donc son retrait.

merci par avance de me contacter.

JcFontan jcfontan@free.fr

Bonjour. Je ne vois pas de raison particulière pour retirer ces photos, qui ne font aucun tort à l'image d'Elodie Fontan - qui est au contraire plutôt à son avantage - et qui ont été prises dans un cadre public. Bien cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour et merci pour votre réponse. Sur cette présentation d'avant première Elodie ne se trouvait pas au mieux et aurai souhaité conserver uniquement la précédente de novembre 2013. Il s'agissait là simplement d'un souhait. Toujours est il n'hésitez pas à aller voir le film qui est cet Instant est à 1 300 000 visiteurs. Bien cordialement. JC Fontan.

Bonsoir. Il ne faut pas en faire un drame : plus sa notoriété ira croissant, plus elle aura des chances de se faire photographier dans des lieux publics, donc il faut en prendre son parti. Mais ne vous inquiétez pas outre mesure, votre fille est tout à fait charmante sur ces photos, qui devraient vous rassurer sur sa photogénie. Si elle appelle cela ne pas être "au mieux", je me demande à quoi cela peut ressembler quand elle est au pire. JJ Georges (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A nouveau bonjour Serait il possible de l'inverser avec celle de 2013 afin de la voir en haut de page et 2014 en bas..Ah les femmes… Merci par avance pour cette dernière réponse. Bonne journée.

Est-ce vraiment nécessaire ? C'est vraiment une affaire de point de vue, parce que j'ai tendance à la trouver plus à son avantage sur la photo de 2014 que sur celle de 2013, où elle a un peu l'air d'avoir le cafard... En comparant les deux photos, il m'a semblé naturel de mettre plus en avant celle où elle sourit, et qui me semblait mieux la mettre en valeur (je précise que je ne suis pas le photographe) JJ Georges (talk) 06:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elsa Pataky cropped

Hey, I hope you don't mind...I should have asked you first before cropping her image, I apologize and you can delete mine if it violates your rights. Thanks. (Monkelese (talk) 14:28, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A nouveau bonjour: je sous joins une lettre de ma fille :

C'est très gentil votre part de me trouver mieux sur cette photo. Mais les goûts et les couleurs ça ne se discute pas c'est sur. Je ne comprends pas le soucis que ça pose de la retirer, elle ne me ressemble pas du tout cette photo, c'est ça le problème. Et là en photo principale sur un site si regardé, je trouve ça un peu dommage, alors peut être que je parais chiante, mais c'est mon image aussi donc... J'aimerai au moins me retrouver dans cette photo. (Ps: j'ai aussi l'impression d'avoir une tête de grosse sur celle ci ^

je vous propose donc celle-ci

File:Elodie FONTAN à la première de QU’EST CE QU’ON A FAIT AU BON DIEU 10 avril 2014

Elodie FONTAN à la première de QU’EST CE QU’ON A FAIT AU BON DIEU 10 avril 2014

Merci par avance

Suppression

Hello JJG. Serait-il possible de savoir où se font les demandes de suppression de catégorie ici ? J'ai créé [4] alors qu'il y avait déjà [5]. J'aimerais donc proposer ma catégorie en SI. Cordialement, Celette (talk) 17:57, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Gad Moi moche et méchant.jpg

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 07:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antonio de Oliveira Salazar.jpg

File:Antonio de Oliveira Salazar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 07:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What happened here?

Hello JJ Georges. I assume this was a mistake? LeeGer (talk) 13:21, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Novak demande respectueusement que vous supprimez l'image Kim Novak Festival de Cannes 2013.jpg

I am Kim Novak's web designer, and I apologize to the users of this file from other countries for using English to write this. I will include Google translations below.

Ever since I began working with Kim nearly a year ago, she has told me that this is not a good picture of her and it upsets her daily that she sees it on the Google search results page, which draws from Wikipedia. She has chosen a picture she likes better with which to replace it, and we will make this request on each Wikipedia page where this image is found.

We would appreciate it if "Kim Novak Cannes Festival 2013.jpg" could be deleted so it will not be used elsewhere in the future and hope you would be so kind as to honor Ms. Novak's request. Thank you, Hannah West

Je suis le concepteur de sites Web de Kim Novak, et je présente mes excuses aux utilisateurs de ce fichier à partir d'autres pays pour utiliser l'anglais pour écrire cela. Je vais inclure les traductions de Google ci-dessous.

Depuis que je commencé à travailler avec Kim il ya près d'un an, elle m'a dit que ce ne sont pas une bonne image d'elle et il lui bouleverse tous les jours qu'elle voit sur la page de résultats de Google de recherche, qui puise dans Wikipedia. Elle a choisi une image qu'elle aime mieux avec qui pour le remplacer, et nous allons en faire la demande sur chaque page Wikipedia où cette image se trouve.

Nous vous serions reconnaissants si "Kim Novak Cannes Festival 2013.jpg" pourrait être supprimé de sorte qu'il ne sera pas utilisé ailleurs dans l'avenir et espérons que vous seriez assez aimable pour honorer la demande de Mme Novak. Merci, Hannah West Hanasazi (talk) 18:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ms Ouest. Indeed the picture is not particularly flattering. I have just replaced it with this one on the German wikipedia so it will not appear again in the google image searches. JJ Georges (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merci JJ. Je l'ai ajouté le modèle consentement de requête pour le fichier image pour faire avancer l'espoir de Mme Novak qu'il sera supprimé de Wikimedia Commons. Je l'ai enlevé de nouveau à partir de la page italienne qui avait utilisé puis restauré ce matin aussi. Merci, Hannah West Hanasazi (talk) 18:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste of my answer on the image's talk page :

Take note that this picture was taken in France and that if I am not mistaken, under French law, a person making a public appearance in a professional context where she could expect to be photographed - and that was undoubtedly the case of Ms Novak at the Cannes film festival - cannot object to being photographed, unless the picture is actually defamatory. So I don't think the "query" tag is actually justified. Take note, also, that there are many much more unflattering pictures of Ms Novak on the internet and on google searches : so I don't think that this picture can be considered detrimental to her public image, and I don't think either that deleting this picture will actually benefit her in any way. In short, if the administrators think that there is a valid reason to delete this picture from commons, they may do it, I won't oppose it. If not, so be it. I don't want to interfere more than I already did. Also take note that since the picture has been removed from the wikipedia articles, it is probably bound to slowly disappear from google searches, so removing it may not be necessary. JJ Georges (talk) 20:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mylene Jampanoi 2011.png

File:Mylene Jampanoi 2011.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

CyberGhostface (talk) 21:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've rescinded my deletion request as it's been almost a week and I've had no response for her yet. Sorry for the trouble, feel free to add the images back. I'll try doing the same.--CyberGhostface (talk) 20:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out she left another message that I've posted in the discussion.--73.17.178.92 15:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sock?

BTW, I wondered, is this you too or is it someone else: User talk:Jean-Jacques Georges? Trijnstel_talk 13:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, wait, never mind. (I feel stupid.

) Trijnstel_talk 14:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Trijnstel : 'tis me, indeed. "JJ Georges" was created because of some error in commons when I created my global account. I am actually considering abandoning this ID to use the "Jean-Jacques Georges" account, now that I've found out it's working here. Not quite sure yet... JJ Georges (talk) 17:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then I would like to advise you to wait until the global merge tool is deployed. Soon you can request merges on m:SRUC and then all your edits are all under the same name. :) I could keep you up to date if you want, but I expect it to be activated very soon (maybe this month or in March). Trijnstel_talk 19:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Trijnstel thanks for the advice. I knew nothing about this tool, so I'll appreciate to be informed.

Now that I have your attention, I'd like to ask you one other thing : do you know if we received otrs authorization for these two photos of one of the Charlie Hebdo victims ? 1, 2. I am quite nervous about them since I was involved in the uploading of these photos and I'd very much like to be sure that we can keep them. I explain everything here (in French) JJ Georges (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've found your email (ticket:2015012210012808), but my French isn't good enough to handle it. Ping @Yann. Trijnstel_talk 20:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Trijnstel Ok, here's the deal : the guy on the picture is Philippe Honoré, one of the cartoonists killed in the Charlie Hebdo attack. Unlike the other four, we had no picture of him, which was especially sad as he was forgotten in many of the homages which were published immediately after the attacks (for two reasons : he was less known than the other four, and his death was only announced late in the evening, so most people didn't know he was dead when the first homages were published). Anyway, someone stole a picture from this article and it was deleted for copyvio. Since it was really a pity, Euterpia and I contacted Marianne Payot, the journalist who wrote the article and took the photos. She immediately created an account on commons and uploaded the two pictures. I can testify that the account Mpayot is the real Marianne Payot and that there is no copyvio whatsoever. I tried to explain her that she should send an otrs authorization to avoid the pictures being deleted, but I have no idea if she did. So I sent a screen capture of our exchange to prove that we had been in contact. I don't have her email but she can be contacted on twitter if necessary. Hope it can help... JJ Georges (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Cannes Film Festival

Hi, I like your photos of the 2014 Cannes Film Festival, but I was wondering if you happened to have taken any of the cast of Goodbye to Language that you haven't uploaded? I've been expanding the article on the film and it would be great to add such photos if this exist.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Deoliveirafan : hi, thanks, but I didn't take the pictures myself, I just got the authorization from the photographer after making a selection from his pictures. I'll ask him if he has anything related to that film. JJ Georges (talk) 10:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you. I just figured I'd check and see if anything was available. Thanks again.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:48, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Deoliveirafan : nope, unfortunately, nothing... JJ Georges (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, thanks anyway.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Missing permission

Hi JJ Georges. I processed the OTRS permission lately, but one file was missing: File:Césars 2015 2.jpg. Since he send the permission for all other files from 1 to 14, I decided to accept this permission too. I did ask, though, if he could send in the permission for this one missing file too. He didn't do that yet though. Could you please ask him to send the permission for this one too? Then everything's properly stored again. :-) Thanks! With regards, Trijnstel_talk 13:29, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Trijnstel : oh, darn. It's entirely my fault, as I prepare the emails for him. I'll try to fix that ASAP. Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 14:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Trijnstel : check the latest emails, it has probably been sent by now. (take note that I don't know if the photographer really understand english ; I know, however, that the peculiarities and rules of wikipedia mystify him completely, so it's better to message me if there is any kind of problem) JJ Georges (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Found and processed. Thank you. Will approach you directly next time! Trijnstel_talk 12:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edith Scob.jpg

File:Edith Scob.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Francinesan (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio Coluche

Bonjour, Sauf erreur, la photo de Coluche en noir et blanc fait partie d'un fonds d'agence de presse. Son auteur que je n'ai pas pu identifier n'est absolument pas celui qui en revendique la paternité.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coluche.jpg

Bonne journée !

Bonjour. J'avoue ne pas comprendre pourquoi ce message m'est adressé, car je crois n'avoir aucun lien avec cette photo. Je ne l'ai pas mise sur commons, et il me semble n'avoir rien fait avec. JJ Georges (talk) 13:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Véronique Genest.JPG

File:Véronique Genest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

193.48.4.6 08:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edith Scob.jpg

File:Edith Scob.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Francinesan (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gilbert Melki 2012.jpg

File:Gilbert Melki 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Intertalent (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gilbert Melki 2012.jpg

File:Gilbert Melki 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

109.190.188.196 09:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Work

Nice work. What a shame you release only low resolution images. Take it from me: you will get far more satisfaction from your work by releasing it full resolution into the MBs then you will holding back into the KBs. These images of film festivals, etc., will never make you any money--there are professionals alongside you who take the same shots with better equipment--so there is very little reason to upload the low resolution files you've been uploading.

File:Sarah Stern Cabourg 2013.jpg

File:Sarah Stern Cabourg 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

109.29.129.178 10:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guillaume de Tonquédec 2013.jpg

File:Guillaume de Tonquédec 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Guillaume de Tonquédec (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salon marjolaine 2015 8.jpg

File:Salon marjolaine 2015 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mini.fb (talk) 15:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

File:Claude Miller Cannes.jpg is during this week on main page of Estonian Vikipeedia in "Did you know, that ...?" Thank you for nice photo! Taivo (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: you're welcome. I'll let the photographer know. Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 22:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:René de Ceccatty 2013 2.jpg

File:René de Ceccatty 2013 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rozmador (talk) 01:30, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

File:Ary Abittan avp 2014.jpg

File:Ary Abittan avp 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

37.70.20.18 16:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mao and Chiang1945.jpg

File:Mao and Chiang1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wcam (talk) 13:00, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Graziella Diamond.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Graziella Diamond.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Graziella Diamond.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Graziella Diamond.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Francesco Malcom Ludivine1.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Francesco Malcom Ludivine1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Asian Shan Kim Serena.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Asian Shan Kim Serena.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JJ Georges: we need the exact url of the image. Not the base one, like flickr.com, but the exact one like https://www.flickr.com/photos/usnavy/34624216924/in/feed. Elisfkc (talk) 20:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: hi. I am currently fixing that. These images will all be validated by an OTRS authorization. I am currently dealing with a film director/producer who has agreed to donate the images and will send an email after I'm finished. I have about 150 to upload. Thanks ! JJ Georges (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JJ Georges: Ok, then add {{subst:OP}} to the files.Elisfkc (talk) 20:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: I'll be doing that to the 150 files when I'm done uploading them. In the meantime, the site's full url must remain as a source. JJ Georges (talk) 20:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Graziella Diamond.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Graziella Diamond.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Arthur Crbz: hi, please read my discussion with Elisfkc above. :) JJ Georges (talk) 20:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for using an image of Catherine Deneuve as an example in a scientific paper

Dear JJ Georges,

thank you for the fast response. I know how I may use the photograph, but sadly the Journal the paper will be puplished does not have the same license as the image. I would be very grateful, if you could sent me the contact of the author.

Sincerely,

Johannes Persch

Archives

Hello again. I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you mean by "the Journal the paper will be puplished does not have the same license as the image" : if the image is published here under a free license, that means you can publish it anywhere for any purpose, as long as you respect what is written in the license text and credit Georges Biard as the original author. Or at least that's how I understand what the license means. However, I will contact the author this evening. If he's OK - and I guess he will - I will send you his email adress by private message. JJ Georges (talk) 07:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the licence of the image is the CC-BY-SA, as the Journal is CC-BY I am not allowed to use the image there. Or do I miss something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPersch (talk • contribs) 08:21, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel Gélin 2014.jpg

File:Manuel Gélin 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Manuelgelin (talk) 18:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raphaël Ferret.jpg

File:Raphaël Ferret.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Zädhir (talk) 10:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:JJ Georges/archives

Tip: Categorizing images

Re: Question

Arilang say Hi

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jose_Antonio_Primo_de_Rivera.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mao_and_Chiang1945.jpg

Chinese soviet flag

File tagging File:Georges_Marchais.JPG

Marchais, Poher et Monnerville

Autorisations - "Photographe du château de Mongenan"

File:Juliette Binoche 1985.jpg et File:Céline Dion 1986.jpg

File:Chiara Mastroianni.jpg, File:Line Renaud Loulou Gasté.jpg & File:Gérard Oury Michèle Morgan.jpg

Mass upload

Une bonne fois pour toute...

Regarding File:Zhang Ziyi Cannes 2011.jpg

Courriels de Georges BIARD

Belle photo

Notification about possible deletion

Nice!

Talkback

NRJ Music Awards 2013

suppression d'une photographie

Bonjour

Notification about possible deletion

photo salon du chocolat 2013 Hapsatou Sy

Jacquet aux César 2014

Elodie FONTAN

Elsa Pataky cropped

Suppression

Notification about possible deletion

What happened here?

Kim Novak demande respectueusement que vous supprimez l'image Kim Novak Festival de Cannes 2013.jpg

Sock?

2014 Cannes Film Festival

Missing permission

Copyvio Coluche

Nice Work

Thank you

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

File source is not properly indicated: File:Graziella Diamond.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Graziella Diamond.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Francesco Malcom Ludivine1.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Asian Shan Kim Serena.jpg

File tagging File:Graziella Diamond.jpg

Permission for using an image of Catherine Deneuve as an example in a scientific paper

Navigation menu

Search