User talk:Ima learner
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Hello - thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects - this is possible only if the images can be found by other people. To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate category and optionally place the images on topic pages (galleries) , or do both (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help. You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files here: Gallery
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do! Thank you.--Panther 06:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm assuming you know nothing about this. Commons images cannot be deleted by English Wikipedia admins, so it was never in any danger from that tag. - BanyanTree 02:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Deletion request
[edit]It's a chocking pornographic animation --Spy-jones 13:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
For me it's only useable for education purposes. i'd suggest NOT to delete this!
- Comment : this deletion request has been actually started on fr.wikipedia following a long debate on whether this animated image should stay on the associated article. A majority proposed to delete it, but it has to be done on Commons anyway. See this discussion. le Korrigan →bla 17:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete outside project scope Madmax32 17:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- It’s surely copied from one of these „funny“ sites on the web. --Polarlys 20:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep : If the deletion debate on this animation started on the French wikipedia article, and they have a consensus to remove it, then they need to remove it from that article. If you delete it from the Commons, then nobody can use it on any wiki project anywhere. Evidently the person who nominated this animated gif for deletion from the Commons never went to the image page of this animation and clicked on the tab that says "Check Usage". As of my post now, this animation is being used on 13 pages in 10 different international wiki projects. I am convinced by it's usage across these 10 wikis that it evidently meets the project scope. Can you please define the term "pornographic" and tell me what qualifies this animation as "pornographic" ? Speculation has no place here in this deletion discussion. This animation didn't come from some "funny" site. It was made from a "public domain" ogg video (uploaded on July 27 2006) that has been on the Commons for almost a year and is currently being used on 9 pages in 3 wiki projects and has survived 2 separate deletion requests. If the French don't want to use this animation on their wiki article, then remove it from the article, but don't deprive the other 9 international wikis that do want to use it from doing so by deleting it from the Commons. One of the steps that is supposed to be taken before nominating an image for deletion is to check it's usage across other wiki projects. You need to do your research first. 67.35.41.237 04:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- what is so educational about this? Is this something you want to show to children as a sex education guide? Is it really 'educational' or is it just pornography? Usage means nothing, wikipedia is not a democracy. The popularity of pornographic websites proves many like this sort of material, unfortunately hosting it here will just mean commons and various wikipedias get blocked as adult websites worldwide. Madmax32 05:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Where is the "sexual activity" in this animation that makes it "pornographic" ? All I see in this animation is a demonstration of the proper functioning of the male sex organ for procreation, no different than watching an animation of a beating heart pumping blood to support life. 67.35.41.237 05:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Do not attempt to be disingenuous with us, obviously its graphic footage of a sexual or obscene act and it qualifies as pornographic in nature in most if not all jurisdictions. Also I kind of find it funny you call sex 'procreation' yet you don't think this is pornographic because it's not 'sexual activity (?) but pornography isn't just copulation, it can be any number of obscene acts, masturbation, ejaculation, copulation etc etc etc. It is still pornography, marking it is 'educational' is disingenuous just like your attempt to defend it, where is this being shown to children to 'educate' them? obviously not anywhere since it is so graphic, and obscenely pornographic. Madmax32 05:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Commons talk:Deletion requests/Image:Ejaculation Educational Demonstration.OGG 68.219.180.155 06:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing pornographic about this, shocking only to those who wish to be shocked by normal bodily functions. Rama 12:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- But this photography hasn't any educative value, it's just a provocating photo. We could accept if this photo wasn't animated (showed only the penis). It's obscene to show the ejaculation in an animated image. Commons accept only educative and informative images, so it's normal to delete this obscenious photo. Spy Jones hder m'âya 17:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Animated images are not educative ? That's news to me. Rama 17:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I am closing this. It seems to me that leaving it open will only lead to a flamewar. The image is kept. Please see Commons:Project scope: This also means that files uploaded to the Commons have to be useful for some Wikimedia project. Media files that are not useful for any Wikimedia project are beyond the scope of Wikimedia Commons. [...] # The Commons may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive. Like Wikipedia, the Commons is not censored. The Wikipedia:Content disclaimer also applies here. As CheckUsage indicates, this image is used in multiple Wikimedia projects. This means per the statement above that the image is within Commons' scope. And as above, Commons contains content that readers consider objectionable or offensive. But Commons is not censored.
If an administrator feels that it is inappropriate for me to close this discussion, reopen it. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations. Is a very strong image.
[edit]Congratulations. Your animation is a very strong image that we can not stay indifferente. It is the same quality that the great works of art have. Since the 19 th century, when Courbet painted "the Origin of the World", a vagina that shocked the entire bourgeois society, which an image with sexual origin does not have such visual impact. Believe it, even without knowing it its art. Beyond to be a contribution to various important educational projects , it is also an image beautiful and very powerful. The courage to do and put in common is the same attitude that the French Impressionists had to propose an alternative, scandalous, to the art of his time. If you have other great ideas like this do not be afraid to place it on commons. If the puritan dominant mentality disturb you, just remember that the moral sexual is a cynical invention and completely false. What shocked the 19 th century society and led to proceedings in court is now being considered culture in the museums of the world.
I would like to have more information about you on your personal page.A view of the pool with a body swiming is not enough. Loose the imagination but it would be more pleasant more pictures and some information. Azoiensis - Professor of Art History.
- I agree with Professor Azoiensis. If this world wants to move on, we have first to accept our realty, and human ejaculation is as normal as digestion or brain functions. Cheers. --Fluence 03:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, now the image is ok. Bye, --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 09:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
A quick question
[edit]How did you get yourself to ejaculate without any manual stimulation?
Very simply.
Great ejaculation video! Thanks for sharing it! :) RorschachsPi (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Sunbathing.GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
ShakataGaNai ^_^ 19:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Sunbathing.GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
- ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 20:34, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Male_Tan-Thru_Thong_SummitBalcony_PCB_Florida.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |