User talk:INeverCry/Archive 6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 →

Image undeletion request for San Miguel de Horcasitas COA

I would like you to please restore the picture that was deleted from the Shield of Arms of San Miguel de Horcasitas: File:Escudosanmigueldehorcasitas.jpg acording to COA Mexico there is no problem with the copyrights of these shield. Thanks!--Sergiozaragoza (talk) 19:27, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done. Make sure you tag these with this pd tag in future, and give the proper source/author info. INeverCry 20:37, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


Template March 19, 2013

Hello this [template] is true or invented by this user. --Veronidae (talk) 20:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Deleted INeverCry 20:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

BSicon request

Hello,
Could you please move File:BSicon STRrf green.svg to File:BSicon fSTRrf.svg over redirect (in line with File:BSicon fSTRlf.svg, File:BSicon fSTRlg.svg & File:BSicon fSTRrg.svg? I guess if just place a {{Rename}}, some non-admin will once again just revert it and propose to choose another name. YLSS (talk) 22:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 22:17, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! YLSS (talk) 22:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Question

INeverCry Could you please cancel your delete request for the files bellow as there nothing wrong with them, please: File:Journalist Marcio Delgado and actor Will-Swenson.jpg File:Marcio Delgado Set.jpg File:Marcio Cecarelli, Vitoria Nabas and presenter Marcio Delgado.JPG File:Marcio Delgado Tom Aggar London 2012.jpg File:Marcio Delgado - Rede Record.jpg File:Jornalista Marcio Delgado e Luiza Rabello.jpg File:Marcio Delgado Gilberto Gil Barbican 2004.JPG File:Marcio Delgado Studios East London.jpg

Thank you for your help. user:anamariasmith

There is something wrong with them. They don't meet the requirements of COM:SCOPE. This is why I nominated them for deletion. I have nothing against you personally. INeverCry 18:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

deleted and problematic files

Dear Sir,

Can I ask you for restoring 3 and confirming 3 pictures? They are pictures owned by our football tournament and they have been deleted or marked as problematic.

Deleted:

Problematic:


Thank you very much for your help

Best Regards

Filip Olšok — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheCeeCup (talk • contribs) 03:24, March 20, 2013‎ (UTC)

The deleted ones were deleted because they came from other websites/internet sources. The problematic ones have no source, and are very small with no EXIF, and one of them looks like an interview screenshot. If you feel you are the copyright holder of these images, then please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the deleted files for you and deal with the problematic ones. INeverCry 18:58, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Question about a deleted picture

Hi INevercry, I work for Gan Assurances's Company and I would like to present it in Wikipedia. Few monthes ago, you delete a picture (Gan-assurances.jpg): the logo of the company and I can't ulpload it anymore... How can I upload again my picture ?

Thanks for you response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delfdi (talk • contribs) 07:24, March 20, 2013‎ (UTC)

That particular logo is complex enough to be copyrighted, and so COM:OTRS permission from the company would be needed to restore it and host it on Commons. There are three less complex logos of this company already here on Commons that could be used though: see here. INeverCry 18:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Yes but it's the oldest logos for the history of the company. It miss the last one. In this way, it's possible to canceled the old logo : Gan-assurances87.jpg and upload the last please ?

I don't know what you're asking me to do? The deleted logo is copyrighted because of its complexity. If you want it on Commons, COM:OTRS permission from the company is needed. INeverCry 18:11, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks! Texasprofessionalpowerlifting (talk) 00:56, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
Thanks. Texasprofessionalpowerlifting (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, but I'm not sure I even deserved the first 1. In any event, 4 is more than enough. INeverCry 01:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Needs detailed description!

As I spend long time in reading and watching Wikpedia/Commons articles/images, I think this is an important tag we need, specially for Common images "This image needs a detailed description". Do we have any such tag? --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 09:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Tito. We do have one: {{Description insufficient}}. Here's a file that's been tagged with it, so you can see how it looks in use: File:Pietro Perugino - Ceiling decoration - WGA17226.jpg. INeverCry 18:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tharakaromesh

Please take care about rest of files mentioned in request. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 18:23, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Image undeletion request

Hello.

I've added a permission tag to several articles, including http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Minkowski_plane

That permission references: http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~ehartmann/circlegeom.pdf

I see several images were deleted, which I believe came from that set of lecture notes. These include:

Before today, I had not seen a permission statement that covers both text and images, but I have checked, and it is acceptable.

If you can undelete these, I will add {{PermissionOTRS}}

to each image.

One of us ought to confirm that the image is in the paper. I will be happy to, but if you do, please mention it.

There may be more images, but these are the ones I have found so far.--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Restored. I'll leave the confirmations to you. INeverCry 18:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
I confirmed all four were in the paper, and have added the permission tag. Thanks.--Sphilbrick (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
No problem. Hopefully you'll get a [Restore] button of your own some time soon. INeverCry 20:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello and thanks for the undeletion of the images above. Please, could You undelete the following images too:

They are contained in the same lecture notes. Thank You ! Ag2gaeh (talk) 08:50, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I've asked Sphilbrick to confirm. INeverCry 18:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
I have added above the page numbers (of the lecture note), where the images appear. Ag2gaeh (talk) 09:04, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay, I've been out of town, and just got home.
I've confirmed that all five of those images are contained in the document which is covered by OTRS permission, so they can be restored.--Sphilbrick (talk) 11:33, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I've restored these five files. INeverCry 18:33, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File:India-Against-Corruption-logo.svg

Does this image come under PD-Text? We have a bunch of derivatives at Commons! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 15:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

That logo is iffy. The stylized people shapes are very simple and common, but the arrangement as a whole might be an issue. There's no entry at COM:TOO for India, so it's hard to say. When in doubt, you can always file a DR.

As for the ammount of time I spend here and on en.wiki, I guess "way too much" would sum it up pretty good. We all have our addictions, and since I don't drink, do drugs, smoke, gamble, or even eat junk food, I had to find a good one of my own. I'll find a way to cut down sooner or later. INeverCry 18:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Deleted images restored

Hi, just letting you know that all the four Ahmed Abukhater images deleted yesterday per previous DRs [1] [2], have been re-uploaded by the same user. --ELEKHHT 21:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

I restored those images per uploader req. The Flickr source has been updated to a CC license. INeverCry 22:15, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Ah, but you're aware that the uploader is proven to have operated multiple sock accounts, engaged in vandalism, and that the images have been uploaded previously [3] [4] withouth copyright evidence, and the newly created flickr account appears to be flickrwashing? --ELEKHHT 05:56, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
I've asked for advice on how to deal with this case. We'll get it figured out asap. INeverCry 19:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done. Accounts blocked, files deleted. INeverCry 22:41, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Email

Morning ☼ (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Morning Sunshine. Let me give that a bit of thought. I'll put together a response as soon as I can. INeverCry 19:27, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
I've responded. Hope that helps. INeverCry 23:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm jealous of that cat.

Wish I could stretch out like that, looks rather lovely.

Would you please delete all except my last version of File:Sailors of Minas Geraes 2.jpg please, I uploaded some interim stages in case I gave up along the way. Thank you. Penyulap ☏ 18:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 19:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Penyulap ☏ 19:19, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File:LG 옵티머스 Q2 광고 사진 - JYJ(3) - cropped(2).jpg

Hi INeverCry, I think I made a mistake when I tagged this one as a speedy; the Flickr source is apparently an official LG stream, so it isn't Flickr washing. Could you restore it? (I can too; I just wanted to run it by you first.) Эlcobbola talk 19:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 20:22, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

comment by new user

(note from penyulap, the following untitled unsigned comment deleted some other parts of the page, restoring)

why did you delete my photo? The OWNER Gave me this Photo, they personally EMAILED it to me to use! (unsigned comment by) Subtitlemeplease (talk) 06:47, 23 March 2013

We would have to have proof that the copyright holder has given permission for the image to be hosted on Commons under a free license. Please have the copyright holder send an email to COM:OTRS. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you. INeverCry 21:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

RE:Autopatrol given

Hi. Thank you :). Regards, Bernard (talk) 12:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 21:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Help needed: User wants a photo, you deleted on my request, to be undeleted. What to do?

Hi, would you please have a look on my talk page and contribute some help: User talk:Miss-Sophie#Re: File:JamesMylne.jpg deletion. Thanks! --Miss-Sophie (talk) 16:36, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

I've commented there. INeverCry 18:36, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Reason for deletion?

I was away for a few days. Logged in today to find all my uploads deleted. Were the images removed because they are of low resolution? Need a detailed explanation (I'm new to the Commons, so not exactly sure where to post this question). Dee03 (talk) 16:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

These were deleted per COM:PRP. INeverCry 21:31, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
So you mean to say these images are not my own work? I'm one of the logistics managers (the ones taking care of the equipment and baggages of players) for domestic cricket tournaments in India, and these images were clicked by "myself" during different times of my tenure. Yes, of course, they are of low-resolution as I don't always carry a professional camera with me during work. But deleting the files just because someone suspects the uploads are not my own work sounds ridiculous. All the images are my own work and free for use over different wikis. Dee03 (talk) 08:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
It might sound ridiculous in an isolated case, but when you consider that thousands of images are uploaded each day, and that hundreds of them are taken from the internet, you end up with far too many to look at carefully one by one, hence PRP. A large number of the small/no EXIF images we see are definitely copyvios, but now and then good images get caught up. I'm willing to assume good faith in this case, and so I've restored your uploads. In future, you may want to upload these in original resolution and with EXIF. Even camera phones use EXIF. INeverCry 18:24, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. Dee03 (talk) 12:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

File:PeruPrimeMinister-Lima-1995c.jpg

Dear INeverCry, you just deleted File:PeruPrimeMinister-Lima-1995c.jpg, but its an edited copy of File:PeruPrimeMinister-Lima-1995b.jpg. Are you sure that it violated copyright? Regards, Moncasi (talk) 19:43, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

I've tagged that for permission, as the actual photographer isn't listed, and we don't have any proof that this account is who it claims to be. If permission is provided, the other file can be restored. INeverCry 19:56, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Deleted image

Hello !

I work for the company Gan Assurances in France and I would like to upload the new logo. Can you delete all the pictures about Gan Assurances (3 in all) because I can't upload the new logo !

Thanks for your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delfdi (talk • contribs) 07:50, March 25, 2013‎ (UTC)

You can upload anything you want as long as it's not a copyright violation and complies with COM:SCOPE. Just make sure you choose a unique filename. Looking at the 3 logos here, you should probably use a name like File:Gan-assurances13.jpg or whatever the proper year is. Just make sure the logo is simple enough to not be copyrighted, or if it's complex, you contact COM:OTRS to give permission for it before uploading it. INeverCry 16:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyvio

Rather than tag the ones that haven't been tagged, I'm pretty sure everything he has uploaded needs to be nuked as a copyvio. [5] Claims to be the author of photos that obviously aren't his. Dennis Brown (talk) 23:29, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 23:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, and thanks for the new toys, although for my latest find [6], I still had to do it the old fashioned way, find the thumb then monkey with the url to find the large version this is a copy from. But that is still a good tool for quickly finding the low hanging fruit. I have to do this stuff at work, people steal our images all the time, so in some sick way, I enjoy the hunt when I know it is a copyvio. Dennis Brown (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Remains of Buddhist sites in Baltistan.jpg

If you can, please consider filing a DR on this image that this uploader uploaded and filing a form of sanctions on the uploader for mass copyright violations (see my comment in the image talkpage). I reverted my flickrpass here but the image is probably another copyvio. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:07, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done Copyvios nuked, user blocked. INeverCry 00:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Also placed http://www.flickr.com/people/norbakshia/ on blacklist. INeverCry 00:40, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Thank You. He/She uploaded so many copyvios that...I just lost track sadly. This must be one of the worst cases of mass copyright violations that I've seen. The flickr account had to be blacklisted. Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you !

I hope this suits your page a lot better than the last ! Penyulap ☏ 09:40, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо Пени! This is certainly well-deserved! INeverCry 19:06, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Приветствуем Вас, and you've never been any good at escaping my attention with your great efforts. Penyulap ☏ 19:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
One of the first things I learned in life is that there is no escape. INeverCry 20:09, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

RE: Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Thanks. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 20:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 20:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Temp-undeleted

Hi INeverCry, I've temp-undeleted File:Marina Kunarova.JPG, as the uploader said that a permission has been sent to OTRS. Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 13:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Question

Hello INeverCry, I'm rather new to this and had many files deleted (list follows). THey are all ok to be put as I have been requested to do so by the copyright holders. Essentially the images are photos of works by Alfred Latour (1888-1964). The type of copyright should state "The copyright holder of this image hereby irrevocably releases all rights to it, allowing it to be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, used, modified, built upon, or otherwise exploited in any way by anyone for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. However, as a courtesy, a link back to © Copyright Fondation Alfred Latour. All Rights Reserved. would be appreciated." How can I put this type of copyright back on the images? Thanks very much in advance. Here are the list of images: File:"Paysage"_1938_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg ; File:"Camargue"_1941_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg ; File:"Rizière"_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg ; File:"Paysage"_1938_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg ; File:"Barque"_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg ; File:"Paysage"_1962_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg ; File:"Baudelaire,_Les_fleurs_du_Mal"_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg ; File:"Paul_Claudel,_Partage_de_Midi"_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg ; File:"Autoportrait"_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg ; File:"Reportage"_par_Alfred_Latour.jpg Josephineemilie (talk) 23:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Proof of permission from all involved copyright holders should be sent to COM:OTRS. If/when everything checks out, they can restore these files for you. INeverCry 23:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi INeverCry,

You seem to enjoy destroying peoples work deleting stuff all day (too)long. I figure you'd know about this but wouldn't frequent that noticeboard because you're kept in the Dungeons busy elsewhere. If you could take a look I would appreciate it because I could stop crossing things out. Penyulap ☏ 17:28, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

That looks like a boring an interesting question.Thankfully Unfortunately, someone beat me to it. Now go bug someone else I'm glad you asked me though. I'm here way to much always available to help. INeverCry 20:57, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Oh good you have managed to dig your way out of the trashpile are here ! I was looking for someone to dump more trash on ask for help, would you please delete the first and third versions of File:乌达木2.png. That should bury you again leave the current version and the one marked with the really long comment. Thank you. Penyulap ☏ 21:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
I've destroyed your work deleted them. INeverCry 21:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. :) Penyulap ☏ 21:28, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

appeall

Dear Never CRY You have deleted File:Capa 3 AGROTEC.jpg, but this magazin cover is free, no copy right, and even so I have them, as main director. Adding, the time magazin, as example, as too a cover on wikipedia commons to illustrate it in wikipedia, I dont understand this dual criteria.

Thank you for revision — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbcspm (talk • contribs) 13:46, March 31, 2013‎ (UTC) --Jbcspm (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

A magazine cover with a photograph is usually copyrighted. If you own the copyright, please contact COM:OTRS and provide permission for the cover image to be hosted on Commons. INeverCry 21:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Also, the covers in Category:Time Magazine covers are free because of their age. INeverCry 21:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Panoramio

Hi, INeverCry. I've tagged {{Copyvio}} with evidences to these files. But the uploader (the sock of User:Sefer ibrahim) removed tags. When you have time, could you control them ? Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

I've deleted all the Panoramio images and blocked him for a week. I've asked Jim to check into the sock angle and I've mentioned the concerns over the fake OTRS tagging, so the block may become indef. We'll see. INeverCry 19:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. Takabeg (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Takabeg -- how do you know he is a sock of User:Sefer ibrahim? I cannot check that because Sefer ibrahim was blocked indef more than two years ago and CU checks can only go back 90 days, so I have nothing to compare to. I see your note on his talk page and Google translate gave me the gist of what he was doing on WP:AZ, but I don't see where you made the connection? .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Jim. It's not so difficult. az:İstifadəçi:Sefer azeri (Azerbaijani Wikipedia, see also File:Sefer2.jpg) is the one of the accounts of User:Sefer ibrahim (Commons). az:İstifadəçi:Sefer azeri confessed here. He said "Bir iki gündü panoramiodan Azərbaycan abidələri, təbiəti və mədəniyyəti ilə bağlı bir neçə şəkil transfer etmişəm commonsa." (I've transferred some pictures on monuments, nature and culture of Azerbaijan from panoramio to Commons in these one or two days.) We understand that he thought me of an Armenian user. He said "erməni olduğunu dəqiq bilirəm, rus və türk vikilərində də onun Azərbaycana qarşı fəaliyyəti yaxşı məlumdu." (I exactly know he/she is an Armenian, his/her actions against Azerbaijan were very clear even in Russian and Turkish wikipedias.) And then User:Legends never dies nominated File:Yerevan Opera House.jpg to take revenge on the imagined Armenian. Takabeg (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
OK, I see that he is probably a sock -- but as a CU I can't block him as a sock because I can't CU him. Easiest is probably just to warn him on Commons that if he uploads any more copyvios after the one week block is done, you will give him a much longer block (maybe indef) at once, without further warning. I'd support that. If anyone objects, then you enlist an AZ Checkuser -- or a steward (User:Trijnstel) if AZ doesn't have CUs and work it from that end. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
The admin whose name was attached to the OTRS ticket on the image I mentioned at your talk has deleted the image and indicated that the ticket didn't cover that image. This user added that OTRS ticket to several copyvio uploads in an attempt to hide copyvios under a fake OTRS tag. This along with the sock issue and numerous other copyvio uploads tells me that this user is a danger to Commons. I've gone ahead and blocked him indef to prevent further copyvio problems. INeverCry 17:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

That's OK with me. Thanks. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

A funny edit...

Hello.

You'll have a lot of fun seeing these diffs: [7][8] A deletion nominator adds {{Vd}} to the community verdicts!

This looks like cheating (e.g. like voting twice) but I'm not much worried. I don't think the closing admin would care.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 09:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

not a good job of cheating, as it only tries to grab bad admins in the web, the nominator may be adding a deletion discussion for other reasons than just wanting it deleted, such as adding it for someone else when they are in fact neutral on the matter. Also, people like me would add a DR on something that should be deleted and then vote keep, simply because I can see the difference between my own opinion and my computation of the community opinion and do what is good for the majority whilst at the same time opposing them. If someone is purely vote counting contrary to the purpose of the DR, well good luck to em, it's not how it is meant to be done. One vk is not double voting imho. Penyulap ☏ 09:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I would basically count that as a comment rather than a vote. INeverCry 17:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Alexander Ipatov Photo

Hi. Would you please tell me why the Alexander Ipatov photo was deleted? It was published on Flickr under the 2.0 license, and that is the license I chose when I uploaded it to Wiki Commons. So I do not understand how there could be a copyright violation. Please explain. Commonplace Book (talk) 01:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

The problem is that the source, http://www.flickr.com/photos/suspeeters/8418347642/in/set-72157632619605240, uses a CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 license which doesn't allow commercial use or derivatives. This license is unacceptable on Commons. See COM:L. We only accept licenses that allow commercial use and derivatives. INeverCry 17:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Inviting to discuss

Hi Dear. Please Reading this topic and participate in the discussion. I thinks this is a renaming fighting and I can not rename this image.--MehdiTalk 15:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

I've commented there. INeverCry 18:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. @};- --MehdiTalk 19:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

maxxl2 Vs Fry

this may disappoint you. Penyulap ☏ 20:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

What is it about logos, flags, and COAs that makes people so argumentative? INeverCry 23:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
They haven't heard of eng:var yet. Penyulap ☏ 00:08, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Fictional Papal Arms

I've seen you've cleaned up the mess earlier. File:Pope Francis Coat of Arms.jpg is an obvious copyright violation, and File:Herb papieża Franciszka I.png is low quality and uses files which are not attributed. Perhaps you can delete them, so we have even less files to debate about. :) Oh, and another thing. File:Insigne Francisci.svg is practically identical to the official version, and File:Coat of arms of Franciscus.svg is pretty close. Fry thinks it's practically redundant, and I personally agree, but I'm not sure if that warrants a deletion. Perhaps you could clear this up? Lemmens, Tom (talk) 20:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

I've deleted the 2 simple cases above. I don't know much about COAs, so I'll wait until there's consensus on what else to keep or delete. INeverCry 21:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm mostly asking about the policy. Commons:Project scope and Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view in particular. It being a COA doesn't really matter. There are some redundant yet not identical files. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

talkback

Hello, INeverCry. You have new messages at Fry1989#Posting_the_text_from_my_talk_page_for_your_perusal's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 15:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC).

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rasierte genital einer frau.jpg

You might want to look at Special:Contributions/Bobbylee187, given your closure here. Nice cat btw. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bobbylee187. INeverCry 00:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Arms of Flanders.svg, an oversight

Could you revision delete both revisions from 16 June 2011? It seems to have been an oversight in the purge of that copyrighted lion. :-) Lemmens, Tom (talk) 11:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 17:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 18:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Khursheed Khan

I have found two new socks of Khursheed Khan: User:Khursheed khanActorsdfsd and User:Khursheed Khan Actor1. Jespinos (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done. Accts blocked, files nuked. INeverCry 19:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

File:'13 Infiniti JX35 -- Rear (SDLDQ '13).jpg

I've nominated this file for deletion. I'm not used to be on this website and I'm not sure if I've followed the procedure correctly to nominate this file for deletion. Can you verify if everything is alright with the way I did it.

Also, please note that I've left to the uploader of this file a warning on his talk page. This user has uploaded dozens of images that are of very low quality and of no use to any of the Wikimedia Foundation projects. His Wikipedia account is already indefinitely blocked due to persistent disruption.

Thank you.

I've fixed it. INeverCry 16:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Why you delete Commons:Deletion requests/File:AntiRus.jpeg?

Why you delete thise file: Commons:Deletion requests/File:AntiRus.jpeg? - Корінь (talk) 14:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I've restored it. INeverCry 16:51, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank You. - Корінь (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for file deletion on Dar Williams page

Hi INeverCry, Recently we requested that file http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dar-Williams-2004-07-18.jpg#filehistory be deleted from Dar Williams' Wikipedia page. We are a music management company who personally represent her, and it would be very much appreciated if you could reconsider your decision to keep the file, and delete it for us. If you could help us with any other way we could replace the file, that would be wonderful-- we have many other photos ready that we would happily switch for this particular one. We find that photo to be outdated, unflattering, unhelpful (in terms of visually recognizing the artist) and of low quality. Please let us know what can be done, and if we can replace it. Thank you for your time! -Justina — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinaHeckard (talk • contribs) 10:46, April 8, 2013‎ (UTC)

The decision actually came by consensus - I just carried out the keep. The image is used in several articles, and so is in COM:SCOPE. You can certainly upload newer, higher-quality images of her, and replace the above image in the articles on en.wiki, de.wiki, and fi.wiki. Once you've done so, you can re-nominate this one for deletion. INeverCry 17:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

A special thank-you message

Thank you for carrying out the deletion of many unauthorized files from Wikimedia Commons, which were recently requested for deletion by users such as myself for using copyrighted content without permission of the applicable rightsholders. Cheers to you for your participation in Wikimedia's "war" on unauthorized copyrighted content! —Seth Allen (discussion/contributions, Monday, April 8, 2013, 21:07 U.T.C.

Yeah, I guess I've done a bit of that now and then. Thanks for the message. INeverCry 22:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Gülşen konser 17.JPG

Hi. Can you delete this one too. Thanks.--Rapsar (talk) 10:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 14:14, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I agree with the file deleteing

The images of the recent stamps that are issued in Taiwan are not right to be uploaded. I agree with that.

I may find the older first day covers instead.--竹筍弟弟 (talk) 10:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Alfred Romer.jpg

Hello! Why the file is removed? After I received the prevention of removal, I found other source of the file and specified it: http://kirillvelimirov.livejournal.com/23549.html Tatiana Matlina (talk) 07:25, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

It was deleted per the reasons given at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tatiana Matlina. INeverCry 18:22, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

photos deleted...

hello, several photos uploaded for over a month were suddenly deleted today.

  1. including File:MasterLi Lecture UN Hall Geneva 1998.jpg、File:Awards Mr. Li Hongzhi Beijing Oriental Health Expos 1992 1993.jpg、File:1999 ten thousand FALUNGONG practitioners CHINA Wuhan.jpg、File:1999 Oct26 FalunGong Beijing Press.jpg, and uploaded these days File:Torture(Bed of the Dead) in China Labor Camp 2012.jpg、File:Torture(Bed of the Dead) in China Labor Camp 2012.jpg、File:Masanjia Female Labor Camp 2010Map.jpg. However, the photos were licensed " As prominently displayed on photo library home page "欢迎转载传阅本网所有内容，但请注明出处" , English translation: you are free to carry and transmit all content, provided use is attributed."
  2. I asked user "Shizhao"(the user asking for deleting) for three times in Chinese Wikipedia, but Shizhao did not reply.
  3. So, Could you help me to know How to improve? Thank you!! Wetrace (talk) 10:26, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
It was indicated that these were taken from website sources. Have you tried asking User:Shizhao on his talkpage here on Commons? INeverCry 18:25, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Boris Teterev (Rundale).jpg and File:Inara Tetereva Valdis Zatlers.jpg

File:Boris Teterev (Rundale).jpg File:Inara Tetereva Valdis Zatlers.jpg Hey! Two photos were deleted with description "copyvio". Both photos are from family archive of Teterev family, both photos belong to them. Can you please undelete it. If needed, I can upload photos to Flickr and attribute creative commons licence.

It would be better if you emailed COM:OTRS giving permission for these images. INeverCry 18:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Fictional Papal Arms

This has been going on for quite a while now. Not sure how the propose to close template works, so I'll do it this way.

The original reason for the deletion request isn't valid anymore (we have official sources now). Copyright violations have been deleted. A merger of File:Insigne Francisci.svg + File:Coat of arms of Franciscus.svg is contested, and such a discussion could probably continue elsewhere. A merger of File:Blason fictif du Pape François.svg + File:COA Franciscus.svg + File:Fictional Coat of arms of Pope Francis.svg + File:Pope Francis CoA.svg was not contested. It's of course up to you or another admin to do this. File:Pope Francis CoA.svg would take precedence in the merger. It would be an image of the Pope's coat of arms before the revision, and I will make a rename request to clarify it after the merger. File:Fictional depiction of a coat of arms for Pope Francis.svg was voted for deletion by UV and Kathisma, agreed to keep by NikNaks, Fry and myself. My proposal to keep it was uncontested by Perhelion, SajoR and Maxxl2.

So, a short summary:

That seems to be the conclusion of the DR. :-) Lemmens, Tom (talk) 13:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Hopefully a few of my less-busy colleagues can handle this one at some point. I already spend way too much time on here. INeverCry 18:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorting out a deletion

Could you please look in on Commons:Help_desk#Picture_deleted.3F? You were the deleting admin; the uploader is asserting that he/she is indeed the photographer & I see no reason to doubt that except for your assertion of copyvio. I'm not at all sure I understand the basis of that assertion, and the matter is made more complex by the fact that an earlier image uploaded to the same filename, File:Tue Byskov Bøtkjær.jpg, does indeed appear to have been a copvio. - Jmabel ! talk 15:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

The image's EXIF shows a named author and copyright. I've explained at the above help desk post. INeverCry 18:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Deleted image

Hi, you've closed this request as deleted, but the image has not been deleted. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 18:47, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Eyesight test

Hi INeverCry, I have an eyesight test for you, can you tell me if File:Hot_air_balloon_sans_darth_vader.jpg looks like this image the same / a crop / different ?

It had been brought up in another DR which looks like a keep on FOP Mexico *possibly*. I figured if it is the same rationale to delete the current one as for the older one, then it's obviously the same reason to keep the old same as the new. If it is the same photo though, there is also maybe minimus to discuss and so on.

Oh, and it would be an opportunity for me to talk **** too, I don't want to miss that.

I asked Tom about the pic in the old DR and he pointed me to that image and answered my question about the location of the picture, which is same as the others it seems, so I figure to maybe ask for an UD at UDR if it all checks out. Unless you see any immediate pressing problem, like it is balloon porn, or that it should be balloon porn, but it's not :o Penyulap ☏ 03:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

It's the same image. INeverCry 17:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Penyulap ☏ 21:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
(grumble) I just had a look at the image myself, now it's undeleted, and I'm afraid you need glasses !!
<oh wait, then you could find the block button>
<Penyulap RUNS!!!>
Penyulap ☏ 05:34, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
I resorted to asking Tom, something I should have done from the start, this one was the one I was after, (I think) but you know, my eyesight) HEY !!! maybe there is a 2 for one deal on gl {I won't dare finish that sentence}
Off to the dr undelete board. Penyulap ☏ 05:40, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Delete image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jaime_Bedia.jpg

Please, can you delete this image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jaime_Bedia.jpg. We need it because our client "Jaime Bedia" doesn't want to be in Wikipedia Commons. I've nominated this file for deletion but I can't get it. Can you help us, please? Thank you very very much.

You should've said that right off the bat. I'll see about this when I get a chance. INeverCry 18:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much. It's really important for our company. It would be great if you helped us, when you get a minute. We are very grateful for your help. Greetings Negofeed 21:00, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
I've nominated the 3 images for deletion with the new rationale. It's up to the community now whether or not to delete them. INeverCry 19:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File:FIFA World Cup Trophy, 2010.jpg

Dear Admin INeverCry,

If you think the actual FIFA trophy is copyrighted, please feel free to file a DR. If not, please feel free to pass it. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't know much about trophies. I'd suggest posting this at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. INeverCry 23:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Declan Donnelly (2009).jpg

Can we revert only the new uploads on this file? The original was correctly imported from Flickr, but Emily-blink182 imported a version taken from some site like this one. I assume the original is from

Thanks! --SamuelFreli (talk) 00:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done. I've deleted the new revisions and warned the user. I've also temporarily full-protected uploading on this file just in case. INeverCry 00:28, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Mistaken deletion

File:Brixton street party celebrating the death of Margaret Thatcher (Taken by Flickr user) 001.jpg

The deletion of this page on licensing grounds was unjustified. The original license prohibited commercial use, however it had been relicesed to allow for such after I made contact with it's author. see [9]

Could you please rectify this. Mtaylor848 (talk) 10:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

The license underneath the image is a free one, but in the license field it says All Rights Reserved. We can't have a conflict like this. The author needs to change the license in the license field. INeverCry 14:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Katherine Ryan, Scoundrels, 2012.jpg

Thanks :-). Nikthestunned (talk) 15:44, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 18:59, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Files

Hi , i want my files all to be deleted , thank you .GhiathArodaki (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Since you've filed deletion requests for these files, those will have to take their course. The Levant image is in use, so will probably be kept. The flag image use is questionable, so maybe that will get deleted, but we'll have to wait and see. INeverCry 18:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Robot revolution

All the robots went on strike ? argh ! will you take a well-earned rest ? or look for particularly naughty users to block instead (Pen runs and hides) what shall you do now ? Penyulap ☏ 01:13, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

I guess I've worn out poor old DelReqHandler... There's plenty of deletion work to be done on en.wiki though. Maybe I'll give FFD a try. As for you, I'll pretend I can't see the [Block] button next to your name. INeverCry 01:24, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Excellent ! Good to know you're spirits are holding out.
Now I'll redouble my efforts to look as if I'm doing anything useful. Penyulap ☏ 01:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
You may have to retriple or even requadruple your efforts to pull that off. INeverCry 02:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Can I ask you to assassinate two lovely sea otters holding hands for me ?

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Sea otters holding hands.jpg

hang on, that's a keep discussion, I want you to destroy the little rats, not adopt them, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sea otters holding hands.jpg here is the real assasination plot.

Penyulap ☏ 09:12, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Foiled again ! some do-gooder is rescuing the sea-otters. (sigh) I've just never been the same since leaving S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Penyulap ☏ 11:48, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Have I called you a genius lately ? I needs a genius with references, a nice chap is having trouble grouping references together, and I can't see where it's going wrong, even though I've done it before many times myself. The first set of references work ok, but any other sets don't seem to want to act as expected. Шуйская is using their userpage as the sandbox, it's here at User:Шуйская. I thought I'd ask someone online and brainy before convincing Шуйская to just make stuff up and sound really convincing. Penyulap ☏ 00:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't know why that material would be here on Commons. She'd be better off starting a sandbox on Wikipedia, though she'd probably run into COI issues in the end. The ref tags don't respond here as they would over there. Nothing like that does. My navboxes perform quite differently here, as do other things I've tried working with. Alot of these templates and tags won't work on ru.wiki and others either. INeverCry 02:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Ahh, that explains why refn wouldn't work either. I'll make sure they know, thank you for the time spent looking it over. Penyulap ☏ 02:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rovi Corporation logo.jpg

Did you decide to keep the raster version? --McZusatz (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Deleted. INeverCry 18:52, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Thx. --McZusatz (talk) 21:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Railway Icons

Hi there. Obviously you have deleted the railway icon files. But any information about that would have been helpful. Look, how our article look like right now. here..... They were used with a template that uses their special naming structure. So everything is broken right now... -- DerFussi 14:19, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

I would suggest you talk to User:Tuvalkin or User:YLSS. I only carry out deletions of BSicons per their request. Other than that, I know nothing at all about them. INeverCry 17:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Ensayo de I Musicisti.jpg

Hi INeverCry, just FYI: I've undeleted this file, after I was notified by the uploader that it credibly falls under PD-Argentina. The uploader herself had initially mislabeled it as CC-BY-SA, which led to the copyvio-tagging. --Túrelio (talk) 22:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Bhavana Mal Actress.jpg

Please take appropriate action based on the two discussions, Commons:Valued image candidates/Bhavana Mal Actress.jpg and User_talk:Rojypala#File:Bhavana_Mal_Actress.jpg. I don't know what is the correct procedure here. JKadavoor Jee 18:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is the same image but improved by the new uploader, perhaps it's fine. I would suggest posting this at COM:VP to get more opinions. INeverCry 18:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of the Louis William Graux files

See : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LW_Graux-côte_du_Morbihan.jpg, and several others by same painter. I know that the painter LW Graux (1889-1962), is not yet in the public domain but what if the paintings represented belong to the person who donated them to wikicommons because that person is heir, right-owner of LW Graux and owner of the paintings represented ? --Dmmtvg (talk) 13:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

If that's the case, a permission email to COM:OTRS saying who they are and etc would be the thing to do. INeverCry 16:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I will try that.--Dmmtvg (talk) 21:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

File:MarkIVFemaleTankAshfordKent.jpg

Here I overrighted with a high resolution provided by Peter Trimming on request per the discussion at w:Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Mark_IV_female_tank. Original file and the license (CC BY 2.0) is available at http://www.geograph.org.uk/more.php?id=3376211 (login required) and http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3376211 (click more sizes). But I wonder whether another verification is required since the source has changed. If so; can you do it, please. JKadavoor Jee 06:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

I would suggest that you indicate that the first revision is from the Flickr source, and that the new revision is from the new source. I can't log in to geograph.org myself, so you'll have to do this. If you need someone to check or verify it, you'll need someone from the Geograph British Isles project who can log in and check that bigger size. INeverCry 16:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. Yes; when I requested the author for a more generous version on his Flickr page, he replied with the geograph link. That page required to be logged in; so I created a login, downloaded, and transferred to Commons. My only doubt is that whether any chance that the file get deleted if the source has missed in future (like Flickr links). JKadavoor Jee 16:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Photo deleted

Hi INeverCry,

You've deleted one my photos published on Dominique Ouattara wikipedi profile page.

I'm her IT administrator and I just want to understand why you've deleted it. We are opened to all your explanations and we want to know how publishing photos without be deleted each time.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredd225 (talk • contribs) 06:49, April 14, 2013‎ (UTC)

What file are you referring to? I need the exact file name. INeverCry 16:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, it's about this picture :http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dominique_Ouattara_22-11-2011.jpg

Thx

The image's EXIF indicates that the author is Alain Herman. We need COM:OTRS permission from this person in order to host the image on Commons. INeverCry 16:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I can't agree with that copyright. Dominique Ouattara is the First Lady of Côte d'Ivoire and her photos are our exclusive property. In most cases, we take ourselves all our photos, so in this case, how can we publish without be deleted ? We don't use photos from any kind of internet database, we choose them directly from the camera. Thx Can we get a model of permission courrier that Mr Alain Hermann can give us ; or Can we have an email adress to which he could send this permission ?

Have Mr Herman send permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The directions on how to do this are given at COM:OTRS. INeverCry 17:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

THX

My mistake

Hello! I made many mistakes in File:CoA Cardinal Giuseppe Siri.svg, sorry. Please delete it, and I will make a new image afresh. Thank you!!--Vanzanten (talk) 00:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

This is in use on it.wiki. I can only delete unused images per user request. INeverCry 00:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Now it's unused. I had replace the jpg version with the svg version, but now I put the jpg again. When you delete the svg, I'll make a better version of it. Thank you again and sorry for the trouble!--Vanzanten (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done INeverCry 00:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

WonkyWikiLove

The Donut of DOOM
You have been presented with The Donut of DOOM

Arggh! you delete lots of (I think) useful pics. I have to go and write another wiki now, to save the pics of all the worlds peoples, so that peoples know what they look like in different parts of the world. (grumble) I don't mind though, but I'll let you nibble the donut of DOOM, DOOOOOM, DOoOOooOOOOOM I tell you. You know, instead of a crappy cupcake or a yukky beer. Penyulap ☏ 01:42, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

We're all doomed, but I guess it's better to be doomed and have a donut than be doomed and not have one. As for "pics of all the worlds peoples", you should start looking thru Category:Media needing categories. With 400000 images, I'm sure you'd find some that would trump those dingy little unused profile pics. INeverCry 01:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh oh! I know that category ! most of my work falls into that one. Yep, I make big big BIG contributions around here. (Penyulap senses danger and runs off fast) I'll have to chat later, bit busy right now ! Penyulap ☏ 01:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Muniryal.ogg

See File:Muniryal.ogg please. Ruan123 (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 21:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks ! Ruan123 (talk) 21:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

File:MThM Na Sedmicke.jpg

You have deleted the photo of my grandfather and I question why. I am the copyright owner of the photo (heir after my mother) and the photo was scanned by me from mother's personal photo album.

I would appreciate a reply and a procedure to undelete / re-publish the picture.

Thank you,

Mvanco (talk) 01:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

It was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:MThM Na Sedmicke.jpg. Who was the photographer? Owning a photo doesn't necessarily make you the copyright owner. INeverCry 02:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

The photo was taken before my birth. I published is as the heir at the request of my mother, before she passed away in 2008

The photographer was probably my father Ph.Dr. Bohumil Vančo in 1941-42

Mvanco (talk) 03:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm signing off for the night, so I would suggest you post an undeletion request. Otherwise, I can look at this again tomorrow. INeverCry 03:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
This image still leaves me with questions. It obviously showed him painting and has been cropped. Why? Milan Thomka Mitrovský was a famous painter, and so I think there's a good chance this photograph was taken by a photographer rather than a family member. It doesn't look like a family snap-shot to me, especially because it shows him painting, which would've been a subject of public interest. Do you have any other photographs of him, preferably with a more personal feel? Something that would be recognizable as a family photo? Him sitting in a chair and not looking posed? I personally wouldn't feel comfortable restoring this image. As I say above, you can post an undeletion request and see what others think about it if you like.

In regard to the use of your image on a website that you mention, see Commons:Enforcing license terms.

The file File:Hana M Herodes a Herodias.jpg was tagged because it has no license. This photograph is another that looks to me like a posed photograph done by a professional photographer. If you have permission for its use, I would suggest you contact OTRS with the details, or that you have the editor send a permission email. Otherwise that may end up being deleted as well. INeverCry 15:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, the photograph was posed in his studio and the likelihood of my father being the photographer lies in the fact that among other things, my father was a photographer and a film maker. http://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohumil_Van%C4%8Do.

I have other photos/negatives that I have donated to the archives of the SNK (Slovak National Library), some (most) of them obviously posed. The photo I posted was most likely printed in the 1950's along with others used in mother's album and unfortunately I haven't been able to find most of the original negatives.

I will try to do a followup on the other photo. It was an "official" advertizing photo and judging from the year of the play, it was about the time mother met father.

Thanks for the reply.Mvanco (talk) 16:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Are you Happy now ?

I've done this only to make you and the staff happy

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/GhiathArodaki

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:GhiathArodaki GhiathArodaki (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

A little question

Hi. Have I made everything correct with this file's license?--Rapsar (talk) 08:00, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

It looks fine to me. INeverCry 17:24, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Reasons for deletion of copyvios

Hi INeverCry! Would it be possible to rewrite whatever you use to delete copyvios to include the reason for deletion? Including the reason could prevent unnecessary URs and questions such as User talk:Moogsi#Robert Ross monument. I assume you go through and mark them and then mass delete them with something. Thanks, –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:46, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm actually using DelteLinks now. I go thru and delete the obvious stuff, and anything questionable I open in a new window and inspect. Unfortunately it only allows a single copy & paste rationale for mass deletions. I wish DelteLinks could mass delete using the rationale each file is tagged with. I have no technical expertise though, so I'm at the mercy of other people's tools. Anyways, if you get a question about a deletion I did, feel free to direct the questioner my way. INeverCry 17:23, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Tsarnaev Brothers deletion

Hello there - I noticed you just deleted the Tsarnaev brothers image as I was in the process of removing the speedy delete tag. I explained why on the talk page. It seems we were functionally edit conflicting each other. The work was in the public domain as described. The original image was cropped, sharpened, and otherwise edited and then published as a derivative work by the FBI and as such is in the public domain. I don't have the image but it should be restored. CoolMike (talk) 17:36, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

If the original image isn't free, then I don't see why an alteration by the FBI would make it free. I'm not going to restore it. I would suggest you post an undeletion request to see what others think of restoring it. INeverCry 17:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

(Editconflict): Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Dzhokar_Tsarnaev_with_brother.jpeg --Itu (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

I've responded there. INeverCry 18:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Request

As an admin, you should be able to 'see' deleted pages, right? Could you check if there is a source mentioned for these deleted coat of arms: Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Katepanomegas#files_created_by_vectorisation_of_a_still_copyrighted_artwork_2. (except the 10 provinces version and Lesser coat of arms of the kingdom of Belgium, which aren't personal coats of arms). I'd assume they refer to a certain law or royal arrest that details all the external ornaments and charges, but I have trouble finding such a law myself. Could you help me? It shouldn't take much time. Thanks in advance. :-) Lemmens, Tom (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

The source info states "{{own}}, some elements by Sodacan {{Created with Adobe Illustrator}}". INeverCry 17:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
There is no law mentioned at all? And in the description? Lemmens, Tom (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
The descriptions look like they give the kind of info you want, but it's in French, and one in Russian. INeverCry 17:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
My French is well enough to comprehend it. I have found a reference from the French wiki now.

arrêtés royaux du 13 juillet 1880, du 19 juin 1910 et du 21 juillet 1921 cités par Jannsens et Duerloo, Armorial de la noblesse belge du XVe au XXe siècle, Bruxelles, Crédit Communal, 1992, t.I.

I'd assume that these things are the texts in French. I'll try to find the royal arrests myself. I'll only bother you again with this if I can't find anything (I hope the archives go back long enough!). Thanks for your help. :-) Lemmens, Tom (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion question

Dont understand I give some picture from a friend, and ecemaml who is he ??? to delete mine ??? User talk:Gind2005.

You'll have to address the issue he raised. These are works of art. Who is the artist that created the paintings themselves, and when did he/she die? Is this a notable artist? COM:OTRS permission from the creator/copyright holder of these works will most likely be needed, assuming the artist is notable. INeverCry 18:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

License issue

A bot left me a license warning on an image I transferred from Flickr, but I'm too dumb to understand the problem. It is licensed under CCby2.0, which I know isn't a default license here but should be fully compatible. Little help? Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 01:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Dennis. It looks like Sreejithk2000 already fixed the problem. I don't use the upload bot myself. I don't upload much from Flickr, but when I do, I upload the image by hand and copy & paste the file info using Flinfo. INeverCry 03:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I was guessing it was something simple like that. I don't move much from Flickr, although I do upload a lot of my own photography. Every now and then, I find an article that needs a photo that I can't just go shoot myself, however. I'm slowly learning the system over here, it is a bit different. I can't ever get the "new" upload script to work, I have to always use the old form. It never gives me an "upload" or "submit" button. Thanks for looking at it. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 03:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Us technical plodders have to stick together. INeverCry 03:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Pictures

Hi

I am Andres Barrios and you deleted the pictures of the article Ignacio Barrios, my father. I am the copyright holder, why did you do that? Could we discuss that? Dont you mind if we chat by email? Please abm_7@hotmail.com

Greetings

Hi there,

You have deleted a few pictures which I uploaded: File:Freddy-Ivo-2011.jpg, File:Pepijn L.jpg and File:Ollie-Ivo-2011.jpg. But I am for the full 100% copyright holder. Can you undo this please?

Kind regards,

Jelmer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelmer18 (talk • contribs) 02:36, April 26, 2013‎ (UTC)

Please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the files for you. INeverCry 15:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

This DR

Perhaps this DR can be closed and the image deleted as the uploader agrees with the deletion. Just a suggestion. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 00:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Schmitt_juergen.jpg

Why did you delete this file even though it had received an OTRS permission? Regards Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Why would an experienced user with 250k edits slap a CSD tag on an image with an OTRS tag? Anyways, thanks for fixing my mistake. INeverCry 17:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

User:Vahalla

Hi, I noticed you deleted File:Amanda-todd.jpg. Thanks for doing that! I wonder how you'd feel about possibly blocking the editor who uploaded the image, as I'm certain some kind of block-worthy rule was broken, and they're evidently not here to do anything constructive if they're falsely claiming copyright ownership of files. Thanks! Evanh2008 (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I can't block the acct on the basis of 1 edit. If the acct name actually matched the girl's name in the image, I would've blocked the acct outright. This is probably a driveby acct, and that's all we'll see out of them. If they come back though, they'll probably end up blocked. INeverCry 17:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Robert Varkonyi.jpg

Hello INeverCry, sorry but I'm here again to ask your opinion. File:Robert Varkonyi.jpg has been deleted due to "No license since 17 April 2013". That image was taken from lasvegasvegas.com, a website now offline. This website released all the images under CC-BY-SA 3.0, as you can read here. It's the same of File:Ben Lamb.jpg or File:2011 November Nine.jpg. Do you think it's possible to restore the file? Thank you very much ;) --Delfort (talk) 18:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

I've restored it, added the license, and added the archive.org link. You may want to add the archive link to any other similar files. INeverCry 19:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Ok! Thank you very much; BTW there are a lot of file uploaded from LasVegasVegas.com ;) --Delfort (talk) 15:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

User Fadesga

Hi INeverCry, thank you for granting me autopatrol rights! Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 22:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 17:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Katepanomegas' "troll" seems to be at it again

user:198.245.50.171 + user:86.195.198.48 + user:90.61.231.219 The same pattern (different ips) as the supposed troll who 'attacked' Katepanomegas. That troll seemed to be Katepanomegas himself trying to get his file deleted in the end. This troll mostly targets files that have elements derived from Katepanomegas' files, and considering that the last things Katepanomegas did before his account got 'compromised' was getting angry at me for not following in his 'delete-everything' behaviour, I fear that it is indeed Katepanomegas again. In any case, the troll removes attributions and replaced them with incomplete attribution templates, in what may be an attempt to later cause the files to get deleted for copyright infringement. A later false tagging of a copyright violation seems to point in that direction. Attempts to communicate through the talk page twice resulted in the generation of a new IP. Is there anything that can be done against this? Lemmens, Tom (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I hope this vandal, whoever it is, will let it rest now. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 17:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Jim had indicated per CU that the vandals were unrelated to the Katepanomegas account back when I blocked it as compromised. Anyways, I doubt that this will be the last we see of this troll or trolls, so let me know of any further problems. With these dynamic IPs, there's not a lot that can be done by way of prevention. INeverCry 17:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

RE - Licenciamento imagem Nenê Felão e Filho.Jpg

Peguei a imagem do álbum de fotos de Nenê Felão no facebook que é público para todos. Gostaria de saber se eu entrar em contato com ele por e-mail quais são as procedências corretas que deverei tomar para ter a sua permissão para usá-las. As explicações da Wikipédia são complicadíssimas.--177.106.31.33 22:10, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I took the picture from the photo album on facebook Nene Felão that is public for all. I wonder if I get in touch with him via email which are the correct origins What should I take to have your permission to use them. The explanations of Wikipedia are very complicated.--Adilson dos Santos Ferreira (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed before the file can be restored. INeverCry 23:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

User:Nejebad

Hi Dear,
If it's possible, Please open user Nejebad's permissions. He is remorseful and expressing regrets about past. --MehdiTalk 06:27, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Mehdi. The regret that you are talking about hardly concerns this issue. He says he is sorry to have not assumed good faith in you, which not the cause of being blocked. However, the block log reports Nejabad is blocked for uploading non-free images after warnings. I do not mean to speak for INeverCry but admins usually unblock such users when they exhibit their ability to tell what is free and what is not and promise not to upload non-free images again.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 06:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, This comment was about this request.Hi, Please open My user permissions in commons, Thanks, He said! We have many discussions about his photos in commons (in my talk page and him) and He didn't have enough information about commons and licenses last week. But He understood something about Wikipedia and commons scopes now. :) I think we can use this user abilities in commons now. He need a help and guides for improve him-self behaviors in Wikimedia projects. --MehdiTalk 08:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Too many admins ask for far far too much, things that have nothing to do with future disruption and everything to do with the admin's emotional retardation (where applicable, present company excluded).
Unblocks are cheap.
Let me say that again, unblocks are cheap.
If Mehdi is going to keep an eye on the user then that's fantastic, one less job for the admin to do. If Mehdi gets a reputation for asking for users to be unblocked when they shouldn't then admins wouldn't answer such requests on the cry wolf principle. I think Mehdi should be assisted wherever possible to help the project. A look over Mehdi's contributions indicates they are a contributor in good standing with the appropriate language skills and interest in the case, based upon that alone, I support Mehdi's request for an unblock. If the world explodes of course, the editor can be re-blocked and BONUS, the opponents get boasting rights. Penyulap ☏ 09:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
✓ Unblocked. If you're willing to vouch for him Mehdi, and give him guidance, I'm willing to give him a shot. As I've told him though, any more copyvios and he'll be given a longer block. INeverCry 16:49, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hopefully, Mehdi can keep a very close watch over Nejebad and be the first to raise the alarm and ask for a re-block if it is required, that way, it would be a shorter block than if someone else had to raise the alarm, and Mehdi keeps their good reputation in order even if a re-block is needed. Penyulap ☏ 17:05, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
@Penyulap:Thanks for Your supporting. I would like helping and supporting all weak users in Wikimedia without any expectation. For example this user.
@INeverCry:Thank you for your generosity. <3 Ok. I'll say commons policies to this user and I think He is useful for commons community.--MehdiTalk 18:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Did you read the talk page before you deleted the file Snoopy walking.jpg? I would like some explanation about that.--SirWalter (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I saw that the Donald Duck image was from an unrenewed film, but I'm not clear on why the Snoopy image is free. I've restored the image for now and opened a DR to make sure we get this figured out. INeverCry 18:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Ok, that is reasonable, thank you.--SirWalter (talk) 19:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Please consider flickr passing this image and closing the DR (that I launched) or deleting the image and closing the DR. Its been in human flickr review for 10 days now. You are a neutral third party here. Just read the DR and decide what is best for Commons as the uploader is an honourable and good uploader here too. I just thought the image was poor quality--but I have no opinions either way if it is kept or not. Thank You and Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I've commented there, but a close will have to be done by another admin. INeverCry 00:00, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ernst von Salomon - Der Fragebogen, 157. - 181. Tausend, Juli 1952.jpg

Hi INeverCry. Just to let you know. --Leyo 18:56, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Levitt photo

A - why didn't your inform me you'd deleted File:Tom Levitt (MP 1997 - 2010).jpg?

B - [10] why have you deleted it? The Flickr uploader has released it under the Creative Commons license, so... What's the problem? Rcsprinter123 (talk) 22:11, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

The file is under a non-commercial license (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0), which is unacceptable for Commons. We don't accept NC or ND licenses. See COM:L. As for the notification, that should be done when the image is tagged for speedy deletion. I didn't tag it, I just deleted it. INeverCry 23:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

wrongful deletions

You wrongfully deleted 2 of my photos (File:Kwasman.jpg and File:DeRose.jpg) that are MY property. You also didn't let me know you were taking such actions. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treyterry (talk • contribs) 00:16, May 4, 2013‎ (UTC)

You were notified on your talkpage. These were deleted as copyright violations. File:Kwasman.jpg was previously published on http://explorernews.com/news/article_2330638c-2928-11e2-8d62-0019bb2963f4.html. File:DeRose.jpg was previously published at several sources. If these are in fact your images, please either upload original, hi-resolution copies with EXIF or contact COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. INeverCry 07:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Through a request that was made to me today, I stumbled upon a few files that are based on the same drawing as Katepanomegas' infracting lions, the drawing linked to in this deletion request.

The second file was already deleted once, but restored by Multichill, but no reason was given. Can any clarity be given in these? Either the PNG file and the Katepanomegas files should be restored, or the arms by Arch (who has left Wikipedia) should be deleted. I guess, as a third option, Piet Bultsma could be contacted in the hopes of getting permission to reuse his original design. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2013 (UTC) And another file here: File:Coat of Arms of the Netherlands.svg. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 11:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi, if I may give my two cents, as I have had deleted much of this uploader's derivative files. The design of arch and katepanomegas lions is not similar. They obviously have different sources:

File:Tmp file for copyvio comparaison to be deleted after debate.png

(to be deleted after decision, sorry for the admins)

katepanomags on the left, as can been seen from a website that used it when it was online (http://www.lionalert.org/images/upload/Gallery%20images%20-%20lions/Netherlands%20Coat%20of%20Arms.jpg) and the one used by arch http://creativeroots.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Netherlands.png . posture, color, shape, too many differences to be considered similar.

I have already pushed arch's design several times on the french wiki as being superior in every way. I think it should be kept. An otrs request would indeed be the best option. Kathisma (talk) 13:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

There are some differences, and I attributed them as Katepanomegas' personal touch, but you are right. Have a look at these files and all its derivatives: File:Nl-arms.gif & File:Nederlands Rijkswapen van 1907.jpg. Stylistically quite similar to Bultsma, but not identical. I can trace it to the 1970s (http://www.geheugenvannederland.nl/?/en/items/NAGO02xxCOLONxxMVC-29679 (link)]. It is also the version used on the royal website.
In any case, the Arch version can be traced to Bultsma, and unless permission is obatained, it can't be used here. I can't find the author of the seemingly official version, on which Katepanomegas based his lions. It's safe to assume that the author hasn't been dead for 70 years either. It's a real mess. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 14:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
heraldry of the world ( http://www.ngw.nl/heraldrywiki/index.php?title=File:Netherlands.gif ) seems to have got an otrs, m. Bultsma may accept another for commons. And if this cannot be obtained, I'm afraid the best option will be to use the raster 1907 design (File:Nederlands Rijkswapen van 1907.jpg) or to draw a totally new version from scratch as you did for the flag of sint-truiden (maybe sodacan would accept). Kathisma (talk) 14:24, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
The 1907 is the design that I was talking about, and linked to. It is the seemingly official version, and not properly attributed. Neither option is acceptable. The best options would be one of the inspired vector files, the ones that aren't direct traces. File:Great Coat of Arms of the Netherlands.svg (Inspired by the Bultsma version), File:Grandes armes Pays-Bas.svg (Inspired by the 'official' version), File:Greater Coat of arms of the Netherlands.svg (Inspired by the 'official' version). Or of course something drawn from scratch. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 14:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Duplicate

Hello INeverCry. There are a duplicate of this image, The reason is here. You can resolve this issue. Best regards. MyCanon (✉) 20:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

It looks like someone disagrees with you. INeverCry 21:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
It was my understanding that all persons involved in a discussion were supposed to be notified rather than being furtive like this. Regardless, my rationale is simply a tweaking to loosen the crop so that hair is not cropped from top and sides, and my crop is made from the original tiff file so there is no generation loss. I liken this to tweaking a sentence on an article by changing a single word, let's say. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 21:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Wrong deletion

Vou are fast on the trigger! The work of the painter Rebry is mine. I took the photo with my own camera in my house. What does it more? I can not ask permission from the artist who died ... I put the photo and your defeated vandalism. I hope you read the comments next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Declic (talk • contribs) 14:23, May 5, 2013‎ (UTC)

What image are you referring to? INeverCry 23:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Never mind, I've commented on your talkpage. INeverCry 23:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

I have been this artwork since 30 years, the heirs are found. Photo and work are my property. The heirs do not even know that I have this work. Please, please do not vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Declic (talk • contribs) 16:56, May 5, 2013‎ (UTC)

It's not vandalism. It doesn't matter how long you've owned the painting. You're not the author or the copyright holder. The copyright belongs to the artist's heirs whether they know you have the painting or not. INeverCry 00:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion question

why did you delete Kaveri-lakshmi-kannan.jpg .it is in the common platform only...Kaveri-lakshmi-kannan.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ma.kayalkanni (talk • contribs) 03:12, May 6, 2013‎ (UTC)

This was deleted as a copyright violation. The reason was: Source shows that the image is non-free ("Copyright 2009 tamilauthors.com All rights reserved." at the bottom of the source page). INeverCry 15:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Three files involving the painter Bruno Montpied

Hello,

It seems you deleted three files involving a painter, Bruno Montpied. There is a mystery here because an authorization was sent by Bruno Montpied on the 23th of April to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org for these files; as there was not any change concerning the status of the files, another authorization was sent on 28th of April. THere was not any answer or change of status of the files.

The files were the following : ’'Reine des Feuilles Mortes Bruno Montpied.jpg’’ ’'Bruno Montpied Photomontage José Guirao.jpg’’ ‘’Bruno Montpied, Sans Titre, 1977.jpg’’

Of course, Bruno Montpied is able to send the files again but it is the first time this problem occurs. Can you help me for the future ? Was the address not convenient ?

I hope I do not bother you. Thanks for your help. Best regards, --Joiesoudaine (talk) 11:11, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Sometimes OTRS can take a while, as they're often backed up. As soon as your email is processed, the files will be restored, so there's no need to re-upload them. If you'd like to ask about the progress of your email, you can do so at COM:OTRS/N. INeverCry 16:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer. Best regards, --Joiesoudaine (talk) 16:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Wrong deletions

Two of my files, have been marked for deletion and deleted, without considering my request. File:Shiva and Parvathi Carved into coconut kernel.JPG and File:Mandali's portrait at 4th Prapancha Telugu mahasabhalu.JPG. I need them to be shown on te.wikipedia.org, please restore. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

These are derivatives, one of an artwork, and the other of a gentleman's portrait, and so they violate the copyright of those works. INeverCry 15:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Heido Vitsur 2005.jpg

Please restore File:Heido Vitsur 2005.jpg. I forwarded the permission emails to orts email, also image was marked as orts pending. --WikedKentaur (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Now that it's been deleted, we'll have to wait for the OTRS permission to be processed to restore it. INeverCry 14:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok, I uploaded it to local Wikipedia. --WikedKentaur (talk) 05:51, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Re:Autopatrol given

Thank you!--Ivan T. (talk) 00:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 00:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

All of my Image files were deleted by you on my wikipedia article, but all of the paintings in the photos are my own work and were photographed by myself.

Hello, the following Files were all deleted by you yesterday off of my wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Michaelcavayero/Michael_Cavayero and I do not understand why. The deleted files are as follows:


File:Cavayero Michael Kyoto Japan 10.jpg File:Cavayero Michael Kyoto Japan 7.jpg File:Cavayero Michael Kyoto Japan 5.jpg File:CavayeroMichael12.jpg File:14Cavayero M 06-.jpg File:Cavayero M 01.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 35.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 34.JPG File:CavayeroMichael 33.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 32.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 30.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 31.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 29.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 26.jpeg File:CavayeroMichael 28.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 27.gif File:CavayeroMichael23.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 19.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 21.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 20.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 14.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 13.JPG File:CavayeroMichael 10.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 12.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 11.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 7.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 8.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 9.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 6.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 5.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 4.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 3.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 1.jpg File:CavayeroMichael 2.jpg File:Cavayero Michael 1.jpg

Each photo is my own work, they are paintings I made in 2008 as well as prints made in 2010 and current paintings. Every single work is mine own and was photographed by me. Each image file was also labeled as OWN and has my name attached to it. That being the case I do not understand why they were deleted and I would like them put back immediately. This is very fustrating as all the work is was already labeled using Wikipedia's OWN marking system. Sincerely, Michael Cavayero (the artist of the images and author of the wikipedia page) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelcavayero (talk • contribs) 09:35, May 8, 2013‎ (UTC)

These were deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Michaelcavayero. You'll have to contact COM:OTRS and confirm that you're the copyright holder, and that give permission for these images to be free and hosted on Commons. Your declined AFC on Wikipedia is a concern though. If there's not a live article on an artist on any wiki, then images of their works may be deleted for lack of notability. INeverCry 17:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Also, I don't know if you're aware, but writing an autobiography on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged. INeverCry 17:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

organizing my images

Hi,

I uploaded This photo, which afterward Rabanus Flavus rotated and cropped (here's the edited image). So now there are two very similar files on commons. Would it be possible to switch my file with his (So the edited file will be under the name of "Knesset Menorah Shema Inscription") and delete the redundant photo?

Thanks, --SuperJew (talk) 18:38, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I don't do much with duplicates. I would suggest asking User:Didym who has much more experience in that area. INeverCry 21:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok thanks, I asked him. --SuperJew (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Clashbgd.jpg

I had received permission for File:Clashbgd.jpg from the photo owner who selected a license for this file's publication and have sent the OTRS an e-mail of the permission given by the photo owner. What is the procedure for this file to be restored? Zastavafan76 (talk) 00:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

All you have to do now is wait for the OTRS email to be processed. Once that's done, the file will be restored. You can ask about progress at COM:OTRS/N. INeverCry 01:10, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:MS-Project icons

Hi. How do you do?

I thought it'd be more convenient for you if I reported this directly: All icons included in Category:MS-Project icons are copyright violations because they are copyright-protected icons of Microsoft Project (a computer program). You can delete the category too.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 16:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 19:31, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Wrong deletion of a photograph

Hi there,

I've noticed that one of my pictures has been deleted by you, although those pictures are my own work so i gave the permision to publice them.

I would like more information about this happening.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicolas Willemyns (talk • contribs) 11:41, May 10, 2013‎ (UTC)

It was deleted as a COM:DW screenshot. To be honest, now that I see exactly what it is, I'm not sure if a virus screenshot would be covered by any copyright. I restored it and sent it to DR to be discussed. INeverCry 19:46, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Plakat jubileuszowego 15. Festiwalu Simcha.jpg

Hello. The image returns –> [11]. pjahr @ 10:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

✓ Deleted INeverCry 16:17, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Mistaken keep

You declined to delete File:Colin Capture.PNG on the grounds that it was "a recent upload and is in use on the user's sandbox". However, the page in which it was used was an attack page (which I have since deleted off enwiki). There is no other reason for the image to exist; as well, I strongly doubt its provenance. DS (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

✓ Deleted INeverCry 16:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

¿Porque has eliminado mis imágenes?

¿Tienen algo mal? Son estas: "Lbdpvsestudianteslp2009.jpg" y "Telon18.jpg", no se porque las has borrado, no se si tienen algo malo, o si violan alguna regla de Wikimedia, solo dime porque, quiero saber que hice mal, porque había hecho un gran artículo, y hoy lo fui a revisar, a ver si lo habían editado, o a ver si tenía alguna valoración nueva, y vi que le faltaban dos imágenes, fui al historial, y pude ver que habías borrado la imagen, y solo quería preguntarte, porqué lo hiciste, para no volver a cometer el error. --187.4.26.240 03:24, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

These were deleted because you took them from the internet: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sebastian Leivas Muslera. You can only upload images that you photographed, or that are otherwise free. See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter. INeverCry 03:32, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

DR question

Full message text
Are the deletions going to affect the pictures in the link below? Those pictures can be enlarged to see the detail. Thanks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignacio_Ch%C3%A1vez_%28President_of_Nicaragua%29

Dear Osloboso,

The Wikimedia Commons page User talk:Osloboso has been changed on 12 May 2013 by INeverCry, see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Osloboso for the current revision.

See http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Osloboso&diff=next&oldid=72794500 to view this change.

See http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Osloboso&diff=0&oldid=72794500 for all changes since your last visit.

Editor's summary: Some of your [[Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Osloboso|uploads have been nominated for deletion]].

Contact the editor: mail: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/INeverCry wiki: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:INeverCry

There will be no other notifications in case of further activity unless you visit this page. You could also reset the notification flags for all your watched pages on your watchlist. 

                        Your friendly Wikimedia Commons notification system

-- To change your email notification settings, visit http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences

To change your watchlist settings, visit http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:EditWatchlist

To delete the page from your watchlist, visit http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Osloboso&action=unwatch

Feedback and further assistance: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osloboso (talk • contribs) 11:17, May 12, 2013‎ (UTC)

This deletion request only affects the tiny versions. INeverCry 18:25, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Request ignored

Please do it earlier: Commons:Deletion requests/User:Cezarika1. Thx. Cezarika1 (talk) 04:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 05:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Thx. I wanted to hide the page history. Cezarika1 (talk) 05:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

deletions

hi;

respectfully, this action [12] was a mistake, in at least 2 ways:

1. there is in fact an article about en:Vanessa Harding & you deleted the only file we had of her at the time. the same user has since uploaded 1 other image [File:TexasChamp.jpg] but it's not a very good one.

2. whether the article on wikipedia en was deleted or not IS C0OMPLETELY SEPARATE from whether an image @ commons is "within-scope" @ commons.

obviously an "in-use" file falls wirhin scope, BUT a file that is not "in-use", or that is no longer "in-use" DOES NOT automatically become "out of scope" @ commons.

we have categories for professional wrestling (in the united states), we have categories for american woman, for athletes, for chonology, locations, etc. the file you deleted could probably have qualified in multiple categories. if you check the categorization on the more-recently uploaded image cited above, you will find eĉamples of suitable categorization within commons' scope.

in this case, the file should have been kept BOTH because there is a wp article about one of the persons & because the subject fits well within commons' scope (in a plurality of cats). please use more consideration before deleting files based on this rationale.

Lx 121 (talk) 10:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

actually, this one was probably a mistake as well, same reason (re:scope):

[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tight-tall.JPG]

Lx 121 (talk) 10:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

I've restored File:Nighthawk with Vanessa Harding.jpg. As for the other, if there's no longer a wiki article on this Nighthawk person, than scope for the image is questionable. You'll have to file an undeletion request for that one. INeverCry 17:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Heido Vitsur 2005.jpg

I received an OTRS permission for this image. Could it be restored. Kruusamägi (talk) 10:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 17:39, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! :) Kruusamägi (talk) 19:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Undeletion requests

Hi INeverCry, I saw that you processed the DR for the following four files

These are indeed scan, but they are taken by the uploader (30 years ago, so no digital version apparently) as well. I verified their permission on-wiki (sorry, it's in Chinese) in late 2012 and restored them once. If it's all right, I'd like to have them restored. Haven't been very active on commons anymore, so not sure what the drill is. --Bencmq (talk) 10:50, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

I would suggest asking User:Shizhao. He speaks Chinese, and can check the link you provided to zh.wiki. He's also an admin here, and can restore the images if everything checks out. INeverCry 17:32, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Rehabilitation of two files and the questions

Hello!

I don't deny that I was doing scans, but some of them were my personal work given at Photoshop and using some chemical editors Symyx, Chem-4D. Can the quality and look like they scan, for example File:Обезвреживание бензантрацена в организме.gif and File:Синтез кофеина из мочевой кислоты.gif, but I assure you, they're personally made ​​by me in the program Symyx. If you look closely you can see that the formulas are not located in a water line scans. I would be very grateful if you rehabilitate these 2 files.

I have another question for you. Can I take the initiative to create a chemical formulas and graphs in the above programs and download them to Wikipedia? And what quality should be the graphs and formulas?

With respect --Djem92 (talk) 17:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

I would suggest filing an undeletion request. As for the question, you'd probably get a more informed answer at COM:VP. INeverCry 17:35, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Armenian Presidential Palace.jpg

For your information, this image was restored because Armenia now has full Freedom of Panorama due to a recent change in this country's laws. It is the only former Soviet state now to have FOP. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Unused banners I made

You may recall I made File:Inevercry.png and File:INeverCry cropped.png a long time ago, I figure to ask you to delete them if you won't use them, I can make better ones if you like :D but I think you like the less political cat. Some people do love my banners though, and they ARE good editors, brilliant in fact, and did I mention they have impeccable taste ? well, it helps when I have a theme to work with, I think the one I had back then was library furniture... (hmm, maybe too boring was the problem)

If you like a banner or any art, please make suggestion. Penyulap ☏ 09:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll have to put in a delete vote on those old things. I'm a bit more utilitarian-minded nowadays. INeverCry 17:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Syria uprising 2013-03-08.png ‎

File:Syria uprising 2013-03-08.png ‎was deleted by you. as far as i remember the file was licensed by cc sa 2.0 or 3.0. how is that copyright violation?-- Iñfẽstør  T• C• U 18:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

This was deleted because the license at http://www.polgeonow.com/p/using-my-maps.html is non-commercial, which isn't acceptable on Commons. INeverCry 18:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol

Thanks, best regards, --Roferbia (talk) 19:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:INeverCry/Archive_6&oldid=175842756"