User talk:Vanzanten
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 20:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Popebenxvi.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Dantadd✉ 17:44, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Tenerifeimpact.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Frame from Seconds From Disaster (season 1, episode 12, "Tenerife disaster") uploaded as "self work". -Rojelio (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Bilder-Verbesserungen
[edit]Hallo Vanzanten, ganz herzlichen Dank für Deine zahlreichen Verbesserungen von Bildern im Bereich Orgel! Das ist ein echter Gewinn und ich freue mich über die schönen Resultate. Merci für Deine Mühe und Dein Engagement. Alles Gute, --Wikiwal (talk) 12:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ist File:Bamberg Obere Pfarre Orgel.jpg hier noch was zu retten, was die Schärfe betrifft? Gruß, --Wikiwal (talk) 13:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- And could you look at File:Büren, St Nikolaus 009.JPG, please? thx, --Wikiwal (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Bilder-Verbesserungen???
[edit]Hallo Vanzanten, bitte nimm bei Verbesserungsversuchen an Bildern die von mir eingestellt wurden vorher mit mir Kontakt auf. Zum einen habe ich die Originale bei mir vorliegen zum anderen bin ich mit deiner Auffassung von besser in den meisten Fällen nicht einverstanden. Du hast eine deutliche Tendenz von einem einigermassen neutralen Farbton die Bilder ins rötliche zu verscheiben, was nicht der Realität entspricht. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Jörgens.Mi Talk 11:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Vanzanten,
sorry for writing in german, but the last text was in german to, therefore I used my mother tongue.
Please inform me before you make an attempt to improve images uploaded by me. First, I have the originals, second in most cases I have a different opinion of better as you. Your idea of colors is to reddish, which does not correspond to reality.
Sincerely yours --Jörgens.Mi Talk 23:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Sede vacante.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 00:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Additional question: How can be or is Cronholm144 the author of File:Sede vacante.jpg ? Has you any evidence (reference) for this? Thanks. -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ ℗ 16:07, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for answer. It seams your retouching was only a cleaning and stretching!? I found (in google) a concrete version of this from 2009, but not a really source. PS. I'm sorry to said insinuate you have " willful false" given information. -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ ℗ 13:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Vanzanten, did you colorize the original b/w photo or did you upload a native color photo? --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
SAme question for File:Giuseppe Siri, 1944.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Medico peste.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Medico peste.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Masur (talk) 18:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Chiesa di San Salvador (Orgue).jpg
[edit]If you have any corrections to images start by asking their author. Thank you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Could you help here, please? It's a little bit dark... --Wikiwal (talk) 12:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- And also this one :File:Evangelische Kirche Villingen (Hungen) 08.JPG. The author Cherubino does agree with reworking it. Thanx, --Wikiwal (talk) 15:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Filiberto di Savoia-Genova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 17:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Miracolo Eucaristico di Lanciano - foto dal vivo.JPG
[edit]I would like to use this picture on the back cover of a book I am writing. My Publisher requires at least an email indicating that you are the owner and give permission to use the image for a book. This is required in spite of the permissions given at Wikimedia commons. Can you send me an email stating such? email is wayward51@outlook.com.
Thanks
Dave
Oybin
[edit]Hallo Vanzanten, could you look at this one? File:Oybin 0005.jpg A litte bit dark. Thanx, --Wikiwal (talk) 12:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Audrey Hepburn black and white.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kaldari (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kaldari (talk) 21:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Nave organ and stained glass windows of Strasbourg Cathedral - 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
95.130.162.196 14:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ziffernblatt astronomische uhr marienkirche rostock.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Ziffernblatt astronomische uhr marienkirche rostock.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
File:RoskildeDomkirke-MindreOrgel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
KDLarsen (talk) 11:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano - public documentation - commissione medica OMS-ONU.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |