User talk:Hard/archives 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:JLIR 2.jpg

File:JLIR 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedro rodriguez.png

File:Pedro rodriguez.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miguel lluch.jpg

File:Miguel lluch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albareda.tif

File:Albareda.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montsegrases 1958.jpg

File:Montsegrases 1958.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jesus urteaga.jpg

File:Jesus urteaga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Escudo Universidad de Navarra.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Escudo Universidad de Navarra.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Escudo Universidad de Navarra.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, el escudo de la Universidad de Navarra, que utilice lo saque de Instagram. Según tengo entendido, las imaganes que aparecen en Instagram son de dominio público, salvo que se especique lo contrario. Por ello lo utilique en Wikipedia. De todas formas, pienso que si fuera necesario podría solicitar un permiso mas formal a la propia Universidad de Navarra, que es, al fin y al cabo el primer interesado en que su escudo se pueda utilizra cunado sea necesario en Wikipedia. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda. Un saludo --Hard (talk) 08:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado, disculpa la intervención pero quería hacer un comentario sobre el tema de los escudos. Según puedes leer en Commons:Coats of arms: "Do not upload coats of arms or their derivatives directly from the web or official registries. Coats of arms drawn by users based solely on the definition (blazon) without any reference to the original drawing (representation) are usually safe for upload.". En español: "No publique escudos de armas u obras derivadas obtenidas directamente de la web o registros oficiales. Los escudos de armas dibujados por los usuarios basándose exclusivamente en la definición (blasón) sin ninguna referencia al dibujo original (representación) suelen ser seguros para subir.". Resalté dos frases que indican qué tipo de escudos son aceptables y cuáles no. Los detalles se encuentran en la página correspondiente. Saludos, Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 17:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado Metrónomo, te agradezco tu comentario. Haré las gestiones pertinentes para conseguir el permiso para poder utilizar el escudo que nos ocupa en Wikipedia. Cordialmente --Hard (talk) 08:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008-04-26 Maria Elvira.jpg

File:2008-04-26 Maria Elvira.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:José Luis Illanes del Río.tif

File:José Luis Illanes del Río.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miguel Angel Martinez Gonzalez.jpg

File:Miguel Angel Martinez Gonzalez.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedrorodriguez2016.png

File:Pedrorodriguez2016.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomas Alvira.jpg

File:Tomas Alvira.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeonardoPolo.jpg

File:LeonardoPolo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:JoseOrlandis19920311.jpg

File:JoseOrlandis19920311.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prelado del Opus Dei.jpg

File:Prelado del Opus Dei.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:José Sánchez González.jpg

File:José Sánchez González.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hello Hard.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miguel Angel Martinez Gonzalez.jpg

File:Miguel Angel Martinez Gonzalez.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Ks ^{[在这里找到答案]} 10:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Por favor, no cree páginas con esas entradas en el espacio de nombres "File:" en todo caso, primero deberías cargar la imagen en ese espacio de nombre, y si quieres discutirlo, utiliza el espacio de nombres "File talk:" y no habrá este tipo de problemas. Ks ^{[在这里找到答案]} 10:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Ks-M9 te agardezco tu mensaje, pero no consigo entenderlo. Disculpa por mi desconocimiento del tema. A que te refieres exactamente con "no cree páginas con esas entradas en el espacio de nombres "File:". ¿te refieres a nombrar la imagen subida con el mismo nombre del artículo?. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda y tu comprensión. Saludos --Hard (talk) 11:34, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeonardoP1996.jpg

File:LeonardoP1996.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ks ^{[在这里找到答案]} 11:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tus fotos

Hola. Si realmente dices que las fotos son tuyas, debes indicar el permiso de las fotos en COM:OTRS enviando un e-mail a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Fíjate si las fotos están publicadas bajo una licencia libre (CC-BY-SA 2.0/3.0/4.0 o en el dominio público) y si es así, las imágenes podrán mantenerse sin problemas. (Mira también Template:No permission since/es). --サンティ ^[talk] 10:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Muchas gracias Ks-M9. Asi lo haré la próxima semana. Si tengo alguna duda al respecto, te escribiré. Gracias por tu ayuda. --Hard (talk) 17:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Una pregunta Ks-M9, en el documento donde doy sl permiso, ¿puedo incluir varias fotografías? ¿cuantas como ma´zximo? Gracias. Un saludo. --Hard (talk) 15:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yo no soy agente de OTRS, recomendaría preguntárselo a uno de los agentes de OTRS como Jcb, y las fotos necesitan licencia libre como te lo indiqué arriba. Saludos. --サンティ ^[talk] 18:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Hola de nuevo Ks-M9. Gracias por tu mensaje. Lo único, no encuentro al agente de OTRS Jcb. ¿Me podrias mandar un enlace para encontrarlo con facilidad? Muchas garcias. Un saludo.--Hard (talk) 07:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jcb. --サンティ ^[talk] 07:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Muchas gracias!--Hard (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Con permiso, no soy usuario autorizado OTRS, pero sí puedo responder tu duda. En el mismo e-mail puedes autorizar todas las imagenes que quieras, siempre que sean tuyas, y si están en la red enviar la url de cada una o de la galería donde estén. No es necesario enviar un permiso para cada imagen. --Jcfidy (talk) 10:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias Jcfidy. Aprovechandome de tu ayuda, ¿te podría enviar el documento con todas las fotos para que lo revisaras antes de enviarlo?. No se si es una práctica común en Wiki, pero a mi me sería de gran ayuda porque nunca he enviado ninguna y es posible que me falte algo. Ya me dirás. De cualquier manera, muchas gracias por todo. Un saludo.--Hard (talk) 10:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Hard, Jcb te ha respondido en su discusión. --サンティ ^[talk] 19:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Buenos días Ks-M9, muchas gracias. Lo leeré ahora mismo. Un saludo cordial.--Hard (talk) 08:21, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lo siento

Revertí tu edición por error, quería marlarla como verificada pero lo estoy haciendo desde el móvil y justo al pulsar se me movió. Un saludo y gracias por tu edición. --Jcfidy (talk) 10:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No te preocupes. Acabo de revertir tu reversión. La verdad es que me extrañó. Gracias por el mensaje, me quedo mas tranquilo. Un cordial saludo.--Hard (talk) 10:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Taivo, acabo de contestarte sobre el origen de todas y cada una de las imágenes que has listado de las que he subido. Estoy a tu disposiicón para aclarar mas el origen de las que quieras y de conseguir los permisos correspondientes para que no sean borradas de Wikipedia. Vuelvo a pedirte disculpas por haber echo las cosas mal, y espero aprender la lección. Lo único, si que me gustaría que me dijeras si el modelo de cesión de derechos es correcto. Gracias por todo. Un saludo cordial --Hard (discusión) 09:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hard (talk • contribs) 09:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

¿Enviaste los permisos?

Hola Hard ¿Enviaste los permisos de las imágenes a OTRS? Pueden ser borradas después de tiempo si no los envías. --サンティ ^[talk] 12:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Hola Ks-M9, si, ya lo he comprobado. El caso es que estoy de viaje y no podre enviarlos hasta la próxima semana. Sabes si se pueden revertir los cambios y volver a lanzar las imágenes, una vez que haya mandado los permisos? Has enviado tu algún permiso? Tengo un par de dudas y me gustaría contar con alguna ayuda antes de enviarlo. Gracias por tu tiempo. Un saludo — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.10.31.228 (talk) 18:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)--Hard (talk) 07:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC) Esta mañana he enviado los tres primeros permisos. Esperaré la respuesta de OTRS para enviar los restantes, porque quiero asegurarme que los permisos están bien. Un saludo.--Hard (talk) 11:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tendrás que esperar ahora, puede ser que tarden un poco en contestar. Y no, nunca envié permisos a OTRS porque nunca tuve problemas con los derechos de autor, y tampoco he violado los derechos de autor. Nunca publiqué una foto como trabajo propio. --サンティ ^[talk] 08:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Muchas gracias, Ks-M9. Esperaré, que remedio. Un cordial saludo.--Hard (talk) 08:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Si no han respondido a tu correo de OTRS en el día de hoy, puedes dirigirte a COM:ON para alertar a los asistentes de OTRS, pero debes hacerlo en inglés. O a caso ¿No hablas inglés? --サンティ ^[talk] 18:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Ya me han respondido. Gracias de nuevo Ks-M9. Mi nivel de inglés es básico. Un cordial saludo.--159.237.12.82 07:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Miguel lluch.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Miguel lluch.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Miguel lluch.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas tardes Elisfkc, ese archivo tiene licencia libre en Flickr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/66383702@N06/29202641713/in/dateposted-public/). Hoy mismo he enviado la solicitud de permiso a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. No borrar, gracias. Un saludo.--159.237.12.82 16:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

La herramienta Gallery no funciona. ¿Podrías comprobar ese enlace? Muchas gracias. Un saludo.--Hard (talk) 16:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Miguel lluch.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Miguel lluch.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 15:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas tardes, Ww2censor la foto en Flickr ha sido cambiada a Licencia libre, como se puede comprobar. Se puede dejar. Por favor no borrar. Gracias. Un saludo.--159.237.12.32 15:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tu licencia en Flickr

Hola, solo te aviso que tu licencia en Flickr es incorrecta. ¿Por qué? Porque tu licencia es Public Domain Mark, lo cual no es una licencia adecuada para Commons. Te sugiero que la cambies (p.e., poniendo que está en dominio público pero sin "Mark" o poniéndole licencia CC-BY-SA 2.0) y no habrá problemas. --サンティ ^[talk] 10:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Hola, Hard. Más o menos eso. La Public Domain Mark significa algo así como que aseguras que algo está en dominio público (por viejo, normalmente), pero no vale como licencia libre. Debes usar la otra opción de dominio público de Flickr, que viene a ser una auténtica licencia que afirma que tú liberas la imagen al dominio público. Creo que es CC0 1.0 Universal. CC Zero. CC zero public domain... O algo así, no sé cómo vendrá exactamente. Saludos. Strakhov (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias a ambos, User:Ks-M9 y Strakhov, por vuestra ayuda. Nunca había subido una foto a Flickr que cumpliera con los requisitos de Wikimedia Commons. Ya he cambiado el tipo de licencia. Si el tipo de licencia es correcta ahora, ¿se supone que el permiso no tardará en ser concedido, no?. Gracias de nuevo. Quisiera conocer bien el proceso de solicitud y concesión de las licencias de imágenes porque voy a tratar de regular todas las imagenes que han sido borradas por diversos motivos. Buen fin de semana a ambos!.--159.237.12.65 12:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons for for a month.. The reason for the block is recreation of content deleted by community consensus and Flickrwashing (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Taivo (talk) 14:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Acabo de ver que he sido bloqueado durante un mes. Sinceramente, no entiendo nada. Trato de hacer las cosas según me dicen desde OTRS. Cuelgo las fotos en Flickr, y me encuentro con esto. ¿Alguién me puede decir que está pasando? Gracias.--Hard (talk) 15:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parece que la foto de Miguel Lluch te la borraron después de una consulta en la que la encontraron publicada en 2015 en otro sitio. Esa imagen está, digamos, en un limbo un tanto feo, porque sospecho es difícil probar que es tuya estando publicada por ahí antes. Han visto que la has subido repetidas veces a Commons y han interpretado que estás haciendo flickrwashing (que viene a ser algo así como hacer colar fotos de otra persona como tuyas en Flickr cambiándoles la licencia). No sé, intentaré preguntar a alguien más puesto en bloqueos en Commons (yo nunca me he visto en esta tesitura y no sé muy bien cómo se tratan estos temas acá). Tú tranquilo, que al final todo se acabará resolviendo... aunque haya entrado en esa espiral descendente en la que todo sale mal... Te aconsejo tener las fotos tuyas colgadas en Flickr con licencia adecuada. Un cordial saludo. Strakhov (talk) 03:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias de nuevo Strakhov, por tu aclaración y tu tiempo. Este tema me sorprende porque desde Flickr, se puede ver la información de esa fotografía, y si se compara con las otras dos se ve que son muy parecidas. Además en la información de la fotografía aparece el nombre del autor, el tipo de cámara. Vamos, que todos los datos apuntan a que las tres imágenes son del mismo autor, y son mías. Tengo otras tantas que también colgué, y fueron borradas, pero como te decía, espero normalizar su situación para que una vez aprobadas, puedan regresar a Wikipedia. Hace unos días envié la autorización de esta foto y de otras dos. Quizás, lo que está vez he hecho mal ha sido no esperar a tener la confirmación del permiso por parte de W Commons. En fin, ya se ve que la vida es un continuo aprendizaje a base de estas sorpresas. Un cordial saludo y gracias por tu ayuda.--Hard (talk) 12:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) Straknov, ¿tienes alguna noticia? Gracias por tu tiempo. Un saludo.--Hard (talk) 16:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perdona, se me había pasado. Uhhmmm... pregunté y no saqué nada en claro, así que lo he pedido aquí, a ver si hay suerte. Un cordial saludo. Strakhov (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC) (Si te desbloquearan por favor no subas ninguna foto de las borradas, por el momento. Poco a poco se gestionará el asunto.)[reply]

(talk) Straknov, muchisimas gracias por tu ayuda, que como se ve ha sido "mano de santo", porque tras tu intervención me han desbloqueado. Espero haber aprendido la lección. No subiré ninguna imagen hasta ver que pasa con la solicitud que envié el mes pasado. Ya me he puesto en contacto con un administrador de Wikimedia Commons. Y espero que lo mas pronto posible pueda normalizar la situación de las fotos borradas. Un saludo muy cordial.--Hard (talk) 08:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No hay de qué. Para eso estamos. :) Strakhov (talk) 16:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, perdonad que me entrometa. Strakhov me contactó... y no fui de demasiada ayuda :-(

No sé si os puedo ser de alguna ayuda. La cola OTRS va con muchísimo retraso y pueden pasar semanas (sugiero contactar directamente con un usuario OTRS como @Ezarate: , a ver si puede verificar el permiso). Por otra parte, @Strakhov: , ¿por qué no te unes a los sobrecargados usuarios que gestionan la cola OTRS :-)? Lo dicho, a vuestra disposición. --Discasto _talk 22:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias por tus palabras, Discasto. ya he contactado con Ezarate. El único problema, que por el momento tengo es que cuando envíe la solicitud revisada, ni siquiera me enviaron un nº de ticket, que me pide Ezarate para agilizar este tema. Pero bueno, habrá que ejercitarse en la paciencia, que nunca viene mal. Lo dicho, gracias, y buen fin de semana.--Hard (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tu licencia en Flickr (2)

Hola (Strakhov), espero no molestarte. Me vuelvo a poner en contacto contigo para preguntarte si sería posible dar otro paso encaminado a solucionar este tema de las fotos que colgué en Wikimedia Commons. Me dice Ks-M9, que mi DNI del flick ha sido listado en la lista de los malos autores por Taivo cuando me bloqueó en Commons, por lo tanto, si subo imágenes desde mi cuenta en flickr, no va a ser válido y las imágenes de los malos autores serán borradas. El caso es que, ya que me desbloqueó, sería importante que me borrara de la lista de malos autores, o me dijera alguna solución alternativa para poder colgar las fotos con los permisos pertinentes. Gracias, una vez mas por tu tiempo. Un cordial saludo,--Hard (talk) 16:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Hard. Cuando saque un rato intento pedir que te saquen de ese sitio tan feo. En tu cuenta de flickr publica el material que quieras, obviamente. Eso sí, cuando quieras subir fotos desde allí a Commons: 1) obviamente que sean tuyas (no tengo la menor duda de que lo serán) 2) que no sean ninguna de las borradas (habría que abrir algún proceso "burocrático" para desborrarlas, creo) y 3) que sean "vírgenes" (no publicadas en internet u otro lugar antes, que Flickr sea el primer lugar donde se han publicado: no facebook, no páginas web, no nada). Así se minimizará el riesgo de posibles contratiempos a prácticamente "cero". Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 19:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, muchas gracias, de nuevo, por tu ayuda. Tendré en cuenta tus consejos, pero mas adelante intentaré hacer lo posible para que se reviertan las fotos borradas. En ocasiones, esas personas han fallecido, las fotos son mías y me resulta imposible conseguir otras. Pero, para tratar de simplificar las cosas, iré poco a poco. Mi primer objetivo es desatascar la cuenta de Flickr. Un cordial saludo, Hard.--Hard (talk) 07:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Hard. Solicitado. Te entiendo perfectamente. Yo haría lo mismo. Ese tipo de fotografías cedidas con licencia libre tienen un valor incalculable. Pero ya te he comentado que en Commons todo gira alrededor de la confianza y hay que ganarla de nuevo. Antes de abrir los respectivos procesos para restaurar esas fotos te aconsejaría subir alguna foto chula, ex novo, por ejemplo, que tomes a partir de este momento de la Universidad y las instalaciones (los edificios también importan! :) no solo las personas!) y Commons (o flickr, si te lo sanean) sea el primer lugar donde se publican. Si están tomadas con tu cámara usual, mejor que mejor. Y después, según te desennegrezcan la cuenta de flickr, abrir las respectivas peticiones para restaurar las borradas hechas por ti. Sin prisas, con tranquilidad. No tenemos fecha de entrega. Pregunto a @Discasto: si cree que la estrategia de subir fotos nuevas con la misma cámara puede ser buena idea. Yo creo que sí. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 09:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ya te han sacado de allí. :) Strakhov (talk) 09:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, muchas gracias de nuevo por todo. Procuraré ir colgando alguna foto ex novo, cuando pueda de edificios. Me dejas sorprendido de tu eficacia. Así da gusto. Un saludo muy cordial.--Hard (talk) 10:00, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias a ti. He visto tu flickr y hay algunas que están allí que pertenecerían al archivo de la Universidad de Navarra (no puedo ver cómo eran las fotos borradas). Independientemente de que sea más o menos correcto publicarlas allí con tal o cual licencia si has obtenido permiso verbal (al fin y al cabo Flickr no es Wikimedia...) si hay fotos de distintas autorías mezcladas allí te pediría por favor que separases las tuyas de las que no lo son, en álbumes distintos. Un saludo!. Strakhov (talk) 10:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, lo haré. Como veo que ahora mismo me va a ser imposible. Si te parece, te vuelvo a escribir cuando lo haya hecho. Gracias de nuevo por tu ayuda. Un cordial saludo.--Hard (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cuando puedas, con calma. Commons no se va a ir a ninguna parte. En las fotos que no sean tuyas, además de un álbum separado, intenta (cuando puedas... (...)) poner explícitamente en cada una "Foto perteneciente al Archivo de la Universidad de Navarra". Cuanto más claro todo mejor... Por cierto, para más adelante, no es necesaria la licencia de dominio público para Commons, también vale cualquier otra que permita modificaciones y uso comercial (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA,...). Saludos. Strakhov (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ooootra cosa. A las del Archivo de la Universidad de Navarra, para que tu cuenta de Flickr sea bien vista desde Commons, además de señalar que son del Archivo, tenerlas separaditas de las tuyas y todo eso, convendría que les pusieras allí una licencia no compatible con Commons (p. ej. todos los derechos reservados) para después liberar sus derechos explícitamente con el permiso OTRS (ya sea con "CC-0", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA",... eso lo decide la Universidad).

Sí, ya lo sé, ni Kafka lo hubiera imaginado mejor, pero con fotos en Flickr que no has hecho tú publicadas con licencia libre: aunque mientras no las subas a Commons nadie te va a bloquear, tu ID de flickr es susceptible de volver a los bad-users. Básicamente porque tú no eres la única persona que puede subir fotos desde allí, tu Flickr es público y cualquier ser humano sentiente puede traerse fotos acá publicadas en tu cuenta de Flickr. No sé si entiendes el quid de la cuestión... Un saludo y perdona la odisea! Strakhov (talk) 12:27, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias de nuevo, por la información que me das, que desconocía por completo. A este paso habrá que hacer una tesis doctoral para poder subir imágenes a Wikimedia Commons. :) Un cordial saludo,--Hard (talk) 16:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno, la Fundación lo pinta muy sencillito, véase si no el diagrama de la derecha :-) aunque hay que reconocer que cuando la foto no es de quien la sube ...las complicaciones se disparan exponencialmente. Dicho esto, a efectos prácticos, si una institución como la Universidad de Navarra quiere poner material del que posee los derechos de autor bajo licencia libre, lo más sencillo es que la institución se abriera una cuenta oficial en Flickr ("UNAV_flickr" p. ej., no sé si existirá) y allí suba lo que estime oportuno. Si la licencia es correcta allí, el traslado acá es trivial. Un cordial saludo y gracias por tus ediciones y gestiones. Strakhov (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poco puedo añadir a lo dicho por Strakhov. Creo que ha hecho todo lo necesario para que, en lugar de perder, ganemos otro usuario. Lo dicho, tengo poco que añadir pero no dudéis en pedirme ayuda si fuese necesario. Un cordial saludo --Discasto _talk 20:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, Discasto, muchisimas gracias por todo. No se que hubiera hecho sin vosotros, nada de nada. Espero ponerme en contacto con quien gestione en la Universidad la cuenta de Flickr (si es que la tienen), para subir todas las fotos del Archivo de la Universidad que subí a Wiki Commons, y dejar las mías, que son pocas, en mi cuenta. Cuando tenga noticias, os vuelvo a escribir. Un cordial saludo.---Hard (talk) 07:31, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, acabo de escribir al Departamento de Comunicación de la Universidad de Navarra, y en cuanto tenga noticias al respecto, te volveré a escribir. En el caso de que tengan una cuenta oficial en Flickr, les pediré que cuelguen las fotos del Archivo de la UN allí, borrándolas yo de mi cuenta. Buen fin de semana. Un cordial saludo.--Hard (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, me confirman que la UN tiene una cuenta de Flickr, pero con una licencia Creative Commons que no es libre de derechos. ¿Sabes si una cuenta asi puede tener un álbum de fotos con licencia libre para poder utilizarlas en wikipedia?. Gracias por tu ayuda. Un cordial saludo.--Hard (talk) 17:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Hard. Hace mucho que no uso flickr como usuario interno (loguearme con nombre de usuario), pero me atrevería a afirmar que, en teoría, se puede asignar una licencia diferente a cada foto sin demasiados problemas. Ellos dicen que tienen "una cuenta con una licencia no libre de derechos"... me suena un poco marciano que al crearte la cuenta elijas una licencia y tengas que apechugar con ella en todas y cada una de las fotos el resto-de-tu-existencia-flickr. Yo les diría que investiguen a subir fotos y prueben a cambiar la licencia que tengan predefinida a las que quieren compartir. Seguro que tú sabes más que yo a estas alturas de cacharrear con estas opciones de flickr. :) Y a ver si hay suerte. Un saludo! Strakhov (talk) 23:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, gracias de nuevo. Si, yo al menos por lo que he visto, las fotos que he subido se pueden individualizar los permisos. Lo que no tenía claro es si con una licencia genérica, no había mas remedio que pasar todas las fotos "por el haro", pero lo que dices me parece de un sentido común aplastante. A ver que pasa. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 10:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tu licencia en Flickr (3)

Strakhov, acabo de hablar con la persona que se encarga de gestionar la cuenta de Flickr de la UN. Me dice que podría modificar los permisos para las fotos que yo utilice, o vaya a utilizar en Wikipedia. Sin embargo, al hacerlo, ha visto que esas fotos, podrían ser descargadas por cualquiera. Y este es un asunto que quiere evitar. Me pregunta si sería posible que la UN las dejara en "Privado" y que yo las pudiera usar igual, obteniendo el visto bueno de Wikimedia. Te traslado su pregunta, para ver si me puedes ayudar. De nuevo, gracias por tu tiempo. Un cordial saludo,--Hard (talk) 14:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No tiene sentido. Una vez subidas a Commons... cualquiera las podrá descargar desde Commons y cualquiera podrá usarlas para ...cualquier cosa, incluso con fines comerciales, satíricos, educativos o... con el único requisito de atribuir al autor original (¿Universidad de Navarra?) y compartir la imagen (o la imagen derivada de esta) con la misma licencia. Cuando cedes algo "a Wikipedia" se lo cedes a Wikipedia y a cualquier otra persona que quiera usarlo, y no un hipotético "uso exclusivo de Wikipedia". Es la historia de siempre de las licencias libres... En fin, recomiendo al gestor de la cuenta de Flickr (o a la Universidad de Navarra en general) que se lea por ejemplo es:Contenido libre y que medite si la Universidad de Navarra quiere liberar sus fotos bajo esas condiciones. Da completamente igual que lo haga desde Flickr a que lo haga dando un permiso OTRS a Wikimedia Commons, el resultado será el mismo, cualquiera se podrá bajar la foto (ya sea desde Commons, ya sea desde Flickr) y usarla para lo que estime conveniente, incluso modificándla, ya sea warholianamente, haciendo un collage, realizando una caricatura a partir de ella o coloreándola con el Paint. Y esto es, insisto, irrevocable. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Te explico el procedimiento Flickr->Commons es: 1) se sube la imagen allí con licencia adecuada, por ejemplo CC BY-SA o CC BY 2) con una herramienta como esta se importa/transfiere semiautomáticamente la imagen a Commons 3) a los pocos minutos un bot hace una pasada y comprueba que a fecha de 17 de octubre de 2016 la licencia era esa. Esto sella el asunto. Si el bot no logra "sellar" esto (porque la imagen acá es de diferente tamaño a la de Flickr (por ejemplo, si no se ha usado herramienta semiautomática, sino que se ha subido a mano y entre medias la hemos recortado un poco) la marca como "Category:Flickr images needing human review". Entonces en algún momento algún miembro de la comunidad confiable y con mucha experiencia acá (un license reviewer, por ejemplo este servidor) la "revisa" y comprueba si está en Flickr con esa licencia, haciendo lo mismo que haría el bot y dejando el sellito.

A partir de ahí la Universidad de Navarra puede cambiar la licencia, borrar la foto en Flickr... cualquier cosa, que seguirá en Wikimedia Commons colgada con esta licencia, pues la Universidad de Navarra ha cedido de forma irrevocable todos sus derechos (excepto los de "atribución" BY, y "compartir con la misma licencia" SA, share alike). Y cualquiera podrá... Bueno, eso. Strakhov (talk) 15:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ni cabe decir que si está en un álbum privado no podrán acceder a él los license reviewers de Commons ni seguramente tampoco el bot. Lo principal es que la objeción de que "cualquiera podrá descárgarsela" no se sostiene, en mi opinión, por lo que te he explicado. Strakhov (talk) 15:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, muchas gracias por tu completa información. La trasladaré a los de la UN, y espero que al final consigamos que las esas imágenes puedan ser utilizadas en Wiki. Te volveré a escribir con cualquier novedad. Un saludo muy cordial, --Hard (talk) 15:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas tardes, Strakhov, te acabo de enviar un correo directo, porque el sistema no me deja que en el mensaje que envío, y que quería escribirte aqui se incluya un enlace a Flickr, que corresponde a una subida que han hecho desde la UN. Ya me dirás, que te parece. Muchas gracias. Un cordial saludo,--Hard (talk) 15:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola de nuevo, Strakhov, muchas gracias por tu correo. Pienso que en lugar de tener ascendencia rusa, debes de tener ascendencia germánica, por lo resolutivo... --) Sinceramente, no sé el motivo de que quieran borrar las fotos una vez aprobadas. Quizás sea debido a que si son fotos de profesores no pegan mucho con el resto de fotos que, por lo que he visto, son mas eventos con gente variada, que fotos personales, mas del tipo de un estudio fotográfico. Pero vamos, que no puedo responderte sobre el particular, porque desconozco el motivo. Aunque les puedo preguntar.

Respecto a las cuentas personales en lugar de las corporativas, pienso que tampoco puedo hacer mucho, mas que trasladarles tus comentarios a ellos. Mi objetivo tras todos estas semanas de multiples correos, -que te voy a contar al respecto, si te debo a ti, poder llegar a buen puerto con este tema-, era conocer y llevar a cabo los pasos sucesivos para subir las fotos a Wiki Commons de manera "legal". Y si he encontrado un camino, gracias a ti, no me gustaría tener que complicarme mas las cosas, tratando de que pasaran las fotos desde la cuenta general a una particular que abra el fotografo. Espero que no te parezca mal. Ya me dirás, en cualquier caso.

Por mi parte, acabo de subir la foto desde Wikimedia Commons. Espero que la subida haya sido buena, y esté todo en orden. De ser así, y abusando de tu ayuda, si no te importa, les pediré que suban las fotos de me pasaron y subí como propias, para que una vez que ellos las suban,... y aquí mi primera duda: una vez que ellos las suban, ¿las vuelvo a subir a Commons desde mi cuenta como tal cosa, o al haber sido eliminadas, debo de seguir otro proceso...? Ya me dirás. Gracias por todo. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 16:41, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poco más te puedo decir. A mí no me parece ni bien ni mal... Está en manos de la UNAV lo que terminen haciendo y en función de la decisión que tomen... pues recogerán unos frutos: más verdes, más maduros, más pochitos... (lo del quemar después de leer/borrar después de transferir ya te digo que mucha seguridad y confianza en la institución, en mi opinión, no va a generar, pero bueno, podría preguntar cómo de mal están vistas esas prácticas a un tercero). Para subir imágenes que se hayan eliminado en el pasado, mejor pedir una undeletion request (Commons:Undeletion requests) y no actuar muy a las bravas. Saludos. Strakhov (talk) 21:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, acabo de enviarles un correo para preguntarles por la causa del borrado. Les he pedido que suban a Flickr un par de fotos. Si finalmente se suben, iniciaré los trámites a través de undeletion request. Entiendo que no hace falta que vuelva a lanzar en Commons las fotos que han sido borradas, tan solo solicitar su "rehabilitación", señalando la dirección de Flickr donde deben aparecer con los permisos correspondientes. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda, que es como siempre, muy valiosa para "navegar" por estos mares de Wiki y de Commons, que en ocasiones me siguen resultando desconocidos. Buen fin de semana. Un cordial saludo,--Hard (talk) 11:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola de nuevo,Strakhov, me acaban de contestar desde la UN: "es un motivo tan simple como que el Flickr de la universidad lo utilizamos solo para publicar eventos concretos de la UNAV, no fotos sueltas que no tienen nada que ver con eventos. De todas formas, si el hecho de que se borren las fotos va a suponer un problema, pues las dejamos y ya está." Parece que dejarán las fotos. Han hecho un álbum dentro de su Flickr para colgar las fotos que utilizaremos en Wiki.

Dicho esto, tengo un par de dudas:

1. Hace tiempo subí una foto del Archivo de UN, atribuyéndomela. No se borró porque la tenía en el taller. El caso es que la quiero volver a subir ahora, pero necesito borrar la antigua. Acabo de subir una segunda versión de la misma foto, pero el sistema no me permite cambiar la atribución de la foto. ¿Sabes que puedo hacer?.

2. Han subido dos fotos ques e boraron. Al utilizar la herramienta que me indicaste undeletion request (Commons:Undeletion requests), ¿puedo explicar en castellano que las fotos fueron borradas porque me la había atribuido a mi, cuando en realidad no eran mías yu que ahora ya dismponen de los correspondientes permisos en Flickr como se puede comprobar a través de los enlaces a las fotos?

Strakhov, reitero mis gracias por el tiempo que te estás tomando en ayudarme. Te lo agradezco muy sinceramente. Espero que pases un buen fin de semana. Un saludo muy cordial.--Hard (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1) Si ya está en el flickr de la UNAV con licencia adecuada, cámbiale la autoría en Commons (quita el {{OWN}} o lo que sea tengas puesto y pon "Universidad de Navarra", y coloca una plantilla de {{Flickr review}} para que alguien se pase y lo confirme. Si no está en el Flickr de la UNAV y/o no se la espera allí en muy corto plazo dime cuál es y la mando a borrado acá. Si me das enlaces a las imágenes concreta me entero mejor qué es lo que pasa. Menos en abstracto. :)

2) No te había entendido. En cuanto al castellano... por poder puedes, pero te aconsejo muy mucho el inglés. Sí, una explicación así podría servir. Un saludo y no hay de qué. Strakhov (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, la foto a la que me refiero es esta: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MCGarciaGainza.jpg. Pero no se donde hay que cambiarla la plantilla...¿La puedes borrar y la subo bien? Gracias. Respecto a las que me borarron, no las pongo en sus respectivos artículos hasta que me contesten que todo esta bien, o puedo subirlas ya? Gracias por todo.--Hard (talk) 17:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He preferido hacer esto. Insisto, no hay de qué, Hard. Un cordial saludo. Strakhov (talk) 18:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Con las otras fotos entiendo que no estarán en Commons disponibles hasta que te acepten la petición de "undeletion" que has formulado. A ver si hay suerte... Si te aceptan la undeletion request, pues entiendo que se podrán usar en artículos. Strakhov (talk) 19:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tu licencia en Flickr (4)

Strakhov, muchas gracias por todo. Esperaré a que acepten mi petición. Un saludo muy cordial. Seguimos en contacto.--Hard (talk) 10:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leonardo Polo.jpg

File:Miguel Lluch.jpg

Ahí las tienes. Con el resto... pues a pesar de lo que pueda parecer ...en Commons el papeleo gratuito no es bienvenido, así que te recomendaría pedir una "undeletion" del resto de las de la Universidad de Navarra de una tacada (citando esta como precedente). Ir de dos en dos cansa un poco. En tu flickr, si queda alguna foto que no sea tuya, mucho mejor que la elimines. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 22:28, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, gracias de nuevo por tu ayuda. Acabo de pedir a la UN que procedan a subir a Flickr las fotos borradas para solicitar la "undeletion" de todas a la vez. Al principio, pensé en solicitar unas pocas para ver como se hacía todo el proceso. Una vez que se restauren, te volveré a escribir para preguntarte por como hacer con otras fotos, pero prefiero ir poco a poco. De mi Flickr ya he borrado las que eran de la UN. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 07:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, acabo de solicitar el revertido de las fotos. Me parece que no me falta ninguna. Te dejo el enlace https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2016-10#Multiple_photos Muchas gracias por tu ayuda. Parece que llegamos a la resolución de la mayor parte de las fotos. Nada de esto hubiera sido posible sin tu ayuda. Muchas gracias por todo. Un saludo muy cordial. --Hard (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Hard. Has escrito la petición en el "archivo". Debes hacerlo en la página principal. Por otra parte, intenta cambiar un poco el texto porque ha quedado un poco rara la parte de "after User:Hard acknowledged I did not take them", que viene a decir algo así como que "después de que User:Hard reconoció que yo no las tomé". Cuando formules la propuesta en su sitio y si me das permiso arreglo el mensaje. Un saludo y no hay de qué. Strakhov (talk) 18:10, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tu licencia en Flickr (5)

Hola Stakhov, Gracias por avisarme. Ya ves que sigo un poco perdido. He borrado el texto de ahí, y lo he puesto, solo en castellano donde me dices (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Multiple_photos) Tambien voy a hacer otra petición por separado respecto a otra foto, que no es del Archivo Fotográfico de la Universidad, sino de la Oficina de Información del Opus Dei, sobre un escritor, cuya foto también fue borrada (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Josemiguelcejas.jpg). Muchas gracias por tu ayuda!--Hard (talk) 09:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno, el problema está en lo que te dije de que en el paso "persona individual"->"institución" siempre hay un pequeño salto en cuanto a lo que presumir buena fe respecta (más grande cuanto más viejas van siendo las fotos, diría yo). La petición aún no se ha cerrado negativamente, aunque bueno, a decir verdad ...no tiene buena pinta, para qué engañarnos. En mi opinión se suele asumir buena fe y dar por bueno cuando una institución "reconocida" libera fotos, presumiendo que saben lo que están haciendo, al menos hasta que te encuentras casos en los que no pueden estar diciendo la verdad. Esta vez... pues parece que se va a optar por ser exigentes. Si al final sale rana este intento, me disculpo por no haberte ofrecido la mejor opción y el tiempo que te habría hecho perder, y solo podría desearte suerte con el OTRS, de eso yo no entiendo mucho y poco te puedo ayudar. Si quisieras proseguir con OTRS al menos el subirlas al flickr de la Universidad podría servir como lugar desde donde licenciar las fotos. Han dicho también que si se llevara a cabo por OTRS se requeriría en él una explicación clara de por qué la Universidad de Navarra piensa que posee el copyright de las fotografías. Vamos, que comenten, aparte de pertenecer "físicamente" a su archivo, por qué afirman poseer el derecho de autor sobre ellas (el/los fotógrafo/s de todas ellas debería/n haberlas sacado trabajando para la universidad y tendría/n que haber cedido sus derechos a esta, por contrato, supongo). Un saludo y siento todo esto. Strakhov (talk) 09:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, gracias por tu ayuda. No hay nada que perdonar, ni que sentir en el sentido de que tu has hecho lo que pensaste que sería lo mejor. Lo que no acabo de entender es como no son capaces de ver que la cuenta de Fickr de la UN, es su cuenta "oficial", por la cámara empleada en las fotos se ve que son de la misma persona. Es posible que, efectivamente en todo el grupo de fotos haya dos, o como mucho tres cámaras distintas, pero no sé. Al menos podían dar por buenas las mas recientes, que tienen la misma cámara. Ya hay otras que están "bendecidas" y son iguales, igual cámara. Yo pensaba ir mas poco a poco, por aquello de "divide y vencerás". ¿Ahora habrá una votación entre agentes OTRS sobre si las fotos se dan definitivamente por borradas o no? En ese caso, pienso que podemos convencer a alguno de los agentes que tengan opción a votar, sobre todo porque en este caso, estamos diciendo la verdad, y esta al final se abre camino. ¿Te parece que escriba a algún agente OTRS para explicarle este tema? Gracias por tu tiempo y ayuda. Un cordial saludo,--Hard (talk) 09:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, vuelvo a escribirte para preguntarte por los pasos que hay que dar para iniciar el trámite con OTRS. Gracias. Un cordial saludo,--Hard (talk) 12:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perdona de nuevo, Strakhov, sobre la foto de José Miguel Cejas, no han dicho nada, ¿no?.--Hard (talk) 11:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Las undeletion request no son "votaciones", sino que se cierran por argumentación y consenso. Y no participan agentes OTRS, sino usuarios, con un administrador cerrando una vez el consenso se haya alcanzado en uno u otro sentido. Espero al menos convencer al personal de que la cuenta de Flickr es "oficial". Sin embargo, sea oficial o no, hemos tenido casos en los que el que un empleado de una determinada empresa ha actuado un poco "carefree" y de forma negligente y luego la institución se ha quejado y pedido borrar las imágenes. En este caso ciertamente algunas de las imágenes antiguas tienen más pinta de "tenemos esta foto en nuestro archivo y es propiedad nuestra" que de "tenemos esta foto en nuestro archivo, es propiedad nuestra y su autor, además, nos cedió legalmente sus derechos de autor". Es por ello que piden que se autorice por OTRS. En lo que a esto respecta, si deseas seguir con el tema (yo me habría hartado hace varias semanas y tirado la toalla) pues tendrás que seguir el procedimiento OTRS. Es decir, la institución deberá rellenar una especie de contrato vinculante para ceder estas imágenes. Nunca he empleado ese método para licenciar nada y no sé cómo funciona. Sé que es un petardo burocrático que termina espantando al personal. Puedes preguntar a voluntarios hispanos que se manejen en aquellos lares. Las instrucciones están aquí y acá. Recuerda que es necesario que se haga énfasis en la razón por la que poserían los derechos de autor. Y si de algunas imágenes no los tienen... pues no se podrán subir. En cuanto a la de Cejas... pues por ahora no hay oposición, qué puedo decirte... debe parecer más razonable que posean los derechos de esa fotografía. Un saludo y siento de nuevo todo este embrollo, yo ya me retiro del tema. Suerte. Strakhov (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por todo. Un cordial saludo. --159.237.12.32 14:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, diculpa que te vuelva a escribir. No entiendo muy bien que pasa con la foto de File:Josemiguelcejas.jpg Aparece "a favor", pero sigue en rojo. Efectivamente, yo me la atribuí como trabajo propio, pero ahora al señalar la dirección de Flickr con los permisos necesarios, debería ser suficiente, ¿no?. Gracias de nuevo. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

La petición no se ha cerrado aún. Sigue en fase de debate/argumentación. Las que están cerradas aparecen con el fondo azul, date una vuelta por la página y lo ves. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 16:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC) Muchas gracias! --Hard (talk) 16:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

Hola, Hard, no soy agente OTRS (denegaron mi solicitud por mi mal comportamiento :-O) y ahora mismo estoy con poco tiempo. Luego trataré de responder algo más coherente. Sin embargo, lo de las fotos antiguas es muy sencillo (ya las vi ayer, de hecho, y pensé en subirlas lo antes posible). Lo puede hacer cualquiera y, si no te importa, lo voy a hacer yo mismo. Existe una herramienta muy útil denominada flickr2commons con la que podrás hacer tú mismo la subida masiva desde flickr en caso de lo que necesites. Adicionalmente, he creado un "contenedor" para tener agrupadas las fotografías. Se trata de Category:Photographs by Universidad de Navarra. Esta noche más... Un cordial saludo --Discasto _talk 17:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He sido más optimista de lo que creí. No he podido subirlas. Investigaré a ver cómo puedo resolver esto. Un saludo --Discasto _talk 17:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: Las fotos antiguas fueron borradas, se ha solicitado una petición de "desborrado" y parece que pinta marrón oscuro. Se está dudando de que el copyright de las imágenes realmente pertenezca a la Universidad de Navarra (vamos, que se piensa que solo son fotos almacenadas en su archivo y que "acuerdos con fotógrafos trabajando para la universidad y cediendo estos sus derechos de autor a la entidad" son al parecer poco plausibles para mediados del siglo XX), por lo que el único camino tiene pinta de ser el OTRS y que la Universidad de Navarra se curre unas razones convincentes para justificar la propiedad de los derechos de autor. Quizás si hay alguna foto nueva (he ido pinchando por encima y la mayor parte están en blanco y negro, aunque alguna puede que fuera blanco y negro modelno) y "la cámara con la que fue tomada..." (no tengo tiempo de mirar EXIF) se puede indicar en la petición (esto va por Hard), a ver si pasa como legítima y creíble. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 17:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: @Strakhov: Muchas gracias por todo el tiempo que os habéis tomado en tratar de solucionar este tema. Sinceramente os lo agradezco mucho. Aún confío en que, al menos las fotos recientes, acaben aprobándose. Y las otras, quizás dentro después.

Dicasto, gracias por la información de la subida masiva, que tendré en cuenta por si un futuro lo necesito. Y por tu ayuda tan rápida. Strakhov, aunque trato de entender lo que dicen sobre el copyright, me parece que el tema es, a mi modo de ver, mucho más sencillo. La Universidad ha tenido una serie de fotógrafos cuyo trabajo (léase fotografías de profesores y edificios de la UN) -relacionado con las labores docentes e institucionales de la UN-, se conservado en el Archivo Fotográfico de la UN. No sé a ellos, pero el sentido común (por llamarlo de alguna manera) me dice que esas fotos son propiedad de la propia universidad, que entre otras cosas, pagó en su día al fotógrafo respectivo por su trabajo y ha conseguido de esta manera la propiedad sobre estas imágenes. Con todo el respecto a la decisión que se tome finalmente, me parece que en este caso se está "rizando el rizo". Con todo, reitero mi más profundo agradecimiento.--Hard (talk) 07:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: Esta tarde he incluido en Wikipedia las imágenes de Federico Suárez Verdeguer y de Valentín Vázquez de Prada, que incluiste en https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photographs_by_Universidad_de_Navarra Si se incluye alguna otra imagen en ese apartado que esté en la cuenta oficial en Flickr de la UN, ¿se podrían utilizar, como he utilizado estas dos últimas? Gracias por tu ayuda. Un cordial saludo,--Hard (talk) 16:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: De momento, dejaré todo como está, a la espera de que, desde Wikimedia me indiquen que pasos seguir para conseguir el desborrado de las fotografías del Archivo Fotográfico de la UN. Un cordial saludo y gracias por tu tiempo.--Hard (talk) 09:36, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obispos

Hola Hard, no sigas subiendo imágenes de obispos porque... ya las he subido yo todas (aquí). Por alguna razón desconocida el sistema no detecta que ya han sido subidas y ahora tenemos un montón de imágenes duplicadas. Un saludo --Discasto _talk 18:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC) PS: tengo una pregunta pendiente tuya. Perdona, lo reviso y te digo.[reply]

Discasto, muchas gracias por las subidas de las fotos. No me acordé que se podían subir todas. Aunque me interesaba ir subiéndolas porque según veia las que estaban en Flickr, comprobaba cada obispo tenia su artículo en Wikipedia, y si no lo tenía, lo hacia, o lo traducía de otra wiki. Una pregunta al respecto. Luego, ¿vas a poner tu las fotos de cada obispo que no tenga foto, o quieres que lo haga yo? Ya me dirás. Siento la duplicidad. Un cordial saludo.--Hard (talk) 19:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr, OTRS, stop

Verás, Hard. El resultado de la última undeletion request de fotografías antiguas de la Universidad de Navarra fue: OTRS permission required. Aunque se aplicara a las imágenes de entonces, es de sentido común (al menos para mí) que la idea es extensible a cualquier fotografía de hace 30, 40 o 50 años que la Universidad de Navarra publique en su flickr (como la del señor Albareda). Que necesitamos que un "authorized official" de la institución se comunique por correo electrónico con la fundación, ceda su permiso de forma expresa y, además, de una razón clara por la que tendrían el derecho de licenciar estas fotografías (haber establecido un contrato con el fotógrafo en tal sentido, obviamente no vale mentir ni decir que "porque están almacenadas en nuestro archivo"). La burocracia no me gusta, pero las resoluciones están, en principio, para cumplirlas. Si no han cumplimentado el permiso OTRS con las que solicitamos en su momento, no veo ninguna razón para subir más material antiguo desde allí. Si no me das una razón convincente, marcaré para borrado las últimas subidas desde el Flickr de la UNAV. Un saludo! Strakhov (talk) 12:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strakhov, gracias por tu mensaje. Tienes toda la razón. Le he pedido ayuda a Platonides, para que, si puede, me diga si el borrador de la solicitud que he hecho es adecuado. Una vez que me de el visto bueno, enviaré dicho borrador a un "authorized official" de la UN para que, tras revisarlo, pueda enviar dicha solicitud a la Fundación. Incluiré esa foto de José Mª Albareda, que puedes borrar cuando lo desees, en la relación de fotos sobre la que se solicitará su "desborrado", una vez que se hayan aclarado estos permisos.

Por lo demás, no subiré ninguna foto que tenga mas de 40 años de la UN, puedes estar tranquilo. Por supuesto que no voy a mentir, ya que las fotos, como te dije hace bastante tiempo, se encuentran en el Archivo de Fotográfico de la UN, y fueron realizadas por los distintos fotógrafos de la propia Universidad, cuyos sueldos corrian a cargo de la misma. Por tanto, quedate tranquilo porque no hay nada que esconder, ocultar o tergiversar. Entiendo que cuando te refieres a que marcarás "para borrado las últimas subidas", te refieres a "las últimas subidas de fotos antiguas", ya que las modernas, que aparecen en color han sido realizadas por el fotografo de la UN, que tiene varias imágenes colgadas en Wiki con todos los permisos en regla. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, exactamente eso. Lo que se concluyó para la tanda de fotos históricas de la UNAV borradas que habían sido colgadas en flickr es aplicable a... cualquier-otra-foto-de-la-UNAV-histórica-colgada-en-flickr. Vaya, que se ha requerido que un individuo con autoridad dentro de la institución explique explícitamente la razón por la que tendrían estos derechos de autor, porque "la comunidad" no se ha fiado de que se estén haciendo bien las cosas (no se presume mala fe, sino simplemente un posible desconocimiento de la materia). Las fotos modernas en principio no están en peligro. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perfecto. Gracias.--Hard (talk) 08:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:MJAsurmendi2016.jpg

File:MJAsurmendi2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cryf2002.jpg

File:Cryf2002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Hard,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

File:FMArocena2014.jpg

File:FMArocena2014.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Esendagorta.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Esendagorta.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Miguel Urabayen.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Miguel Urabayen.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Ww2censor (talk) 17:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first"). Elisfkc (talk) 17:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Maria Vallejo Nagera.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Maria Vallejo Nagera.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ju Ta 14:47, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria Vallejo Nagera.jpg

Please take care when providing the source urls for images because this one pointed to the wrong image, so could easily have been deleted. I found the correct source and have fixed it, so now I've given it a good review. Also you should always use the highest resolution available, known on Flickr as the "original" and i have uploaded that too. Ww2censor (talk) 15:17, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ww2censor, Thank you very much for your help. I will try to be more careful in the next few occasions. a cordial greeting.--Hard (talk) 08:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hard: For File:Pedroroncal.jpg you again uploaded a low resolution image so the review robot could not find it meaning a human had to review it again. In future, from Flickr, please only upload the highest resolution version. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Lorenzo Luis Garcia.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lorenzo Luis Garcia.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lorenzo Luis Garcia.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avalero.jpg

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ മലയാളം ∙ +/−

Hello! Thank you for uploading File:Avalero.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I have noticed that the version you uploaded is a thumbnail, while a larger version is available. Please upload the full version of the image. Thank you,

--Animalparty (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr

File:Logo OMP.jpg

Either use a tool to upload (~~UploadWizard Flickr import,~~ Flickr2Commons) or enter the correct source link. This can't be reviewed. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:PremioLukaBrajnovic.jpg

File:PremioLukaBrajnovic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roy17 (talk) 12:52, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:ManuelMarchena2020.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ManuelMarchena2020.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:ManuelMarchena2020.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Cohn (talk) 17:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CMbelagua2010.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Hello Hard,

I noticed you've uploaded multiple images that differ only in size, and I thought I should draw your attention to a certain feature of our software. MediaWiki, the software which drives Commons and other projects like Wikipedia, is able to handle reducing the size of the images automatically. For example, even though File:Red Apple.jpg is a very large picture (2418 × 2192 pixel), MediaWiki can automatically generate thumbnails in all sizes (example: 50-pixel thumbnail).

You can include a resized thumbnail of any image in a Wikipedia article using [[File:Red Apple.jpg|thumb|Description here]]

For a narrower image – those in upright or portrait aspect ratio – use [[File:Red Apple.jpg|thumb|upright|Description here]]

Thanks to this feature, you only need to upload the highest-resolution image you have available. That's why File:CMbelagua2010.jpg will be deleted soon, while your larger image will remain available for use and resizing. I also recommend reading the picture tutorial, you will find answer for nearly all your questions regarding use of images there. Thank you and happy uploading.

-Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABenito.jpg

File:ABenito.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Juan botas.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Juan botas.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Juan botas.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariscadas.jpg

File:Mariscadas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alex Cohn (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:JMdelaRosa.jpg

File:JMdelaRosa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

219.78.190.68 06:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:ISEM taller.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:ISEM taller.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Thuresson (talk) 22:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Logo OMP.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Logo OMP.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Logo OMP.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Thuresson (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:JoseRamonIglesias.jpg

File:JoseRamonIglesias.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yeeno (talk) 19:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:ISEM taller.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:ISEM taller.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Wdwd (talk) 13:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MJUlla.jpg

File:MJUlla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Strakhov (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Mialmare2022.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Mialmare2022.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mialmare2022.jpg

File:Mialmare2022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Strakhov (talk) 19:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ptijan.jpg

File:Ptijan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:BibliotecaUN2006.gif

File:BibliotecaUN2006.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:JuanSBotas.jpg

File:JuanSBotas.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Image uploaded to Commons and Flickr after it was published in at least one blogpost. Also thumbnail size without exif-data, making it unlikely to be the work of the person who published it on Flickr

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TommyG (talk) 08:54, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:JMR2018.jpg

File:JMR2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:LogoIECO.jpg

File:LogoIECO.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:LogoIECO.jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Hard!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Elisfkc (talk) 03:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:JMRosa2022.jpg

File:JMRosa2022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph was posted by the author of the image on Flickr with a license to be used in Commons: https://flickr.com/photos/193480381@N05/53038879396. The photo complies with Commons rules to stay where it is and not be deleted. Cordially, Hard (talk) 16:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:JornadaFamilia.jpg

File:JornadaFamilia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:LuisGRojas.jpg

File:LuisGRojas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel ME.jpg

File:Manuel ME.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:JulioH1.png

File:JulioH1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:JPhilippeVitoria.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:JPhilippeVitoria.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Genji.jpg

File:Genji.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 00:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MJU69.jpg

File:MJU69.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gperez24.jpg

File:Gperez24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lariz20220624.jpg

File:Lariz20220624.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GabrielP2024.jpg

File:GabrielP2024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centre de Sante 019.jpg

Template:Idw/layout Günther Frager (talk) 21:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hard/archives 1

File source is not properly indicated: File:Escudo Universidad de Navarra.jpg

Copyright violations

Tus fotos

Lo siento

Notification about possible deletion

¿Enviaste los permisos?

File source is not properly indicated: File:Miguel lluch.jpg

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Miguel lluch.jpg

Tu licencia en Flickr

Your account has been blocked

Tu licencia en Flickr (2)

Tu licencia en Flickr (3)

Tu licencia en Flickr (4)

Tu licencia en Flickr (5)

Hola

Obispos

Flickr, OTRS, stop

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Esendagorta.jpg

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Miguel Urabayen.jpg

Flickr2Commons

File source is not properly indicated: File:Maria Vallejo Nagera.jpg

File tagging File:Lorenzo Luis Garcia.jpg

Flickr

File source is not properly indicated: File:ManuelMarchena2020.jpg

File tagging File:Juan botas.jpg

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:ISEM taller.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Logo OMP.jpg

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:ISEM taller.jpg

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Mialmare2022.jpg

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:JPhilippeVitoria.jpg

Navigation menu

Search