User talk:Glabb/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont suspendu d'Ingrandes-sur-Loire (5).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont suspendu d'Ingrandes-sur-Loire (6).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont suspendu d'Ingrandes-sur-Loire (1).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont haubané de Saint-Florent-le-Vieil (4).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont suspendu d'Ingrandes-sur-Loire (7).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont suspendu d'Ingrandes-sur-Loire (8).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont suspendu d'Ingrandes-sur-Loire (2).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont suspendu d'Ingrandes-sur-Loire (3).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont haubané de Saint-Florent-le-Vieil.jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont haubané de Saint-Florent-le-Vieil (3).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont haubané de Saint-Florent-le-Vieil (2).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont haubané de Saint-Florent-le-Vieil (1).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont suspendu d'Ingrandes-sur-Loire (4).jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont suspendu de Montjean-sur-Loire (16).jpg was uncategorized on 6 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Pont-cadre.svg was uncategorized on 13 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Cruisin' Down The Yangtze, Baidicheng Wind and Rain Bridge.jpg was uncategorized on 29 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Viaduc de la Maine (7).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Croquant (talk) 09:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Viaduc de la Maine (7).jpg
Bonjour,
Pour l'instant, l'utilisation de cette image est soumise à des restrictions explicites : « Pour la publication (imprimée, en-ligne ou autre méthode) et/ou l'exploitation commerciale de cette image, par exemple sur un site Internet non-personnel, il faut obtenir la permission du détenteur du copyright et/ou du photographe », ce qui n'est pas compatible avec la licence indiquée, qui permet le réutilisation de l'image, même à des fins commerciales, sans qu'il soit nécessaire d'en demander l'autorisation. Il faudrait donc que l'auteur fournisse une autorisation conforme à la licence ; la procédure à suivre est expliquée dans la page Commons:OTRS/fr. Cordialement. Croquant (talk) 08:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Oresundsbroen_HCS(2).jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Oresundsbroen_HCS(2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Oresundsbroen_HCS(2).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 16:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello there, you uploaded a couple of pictures from Flickr. Could you be so kind as to upload the original Flickr file, wait for the clearance by the bot and than overload your improved version? This would save us a lot of work as we have to check each photo which is not byte for byte identical with the one on Flickr manually. Thanks for your consideration and keep the good work up, --Mirko Junge (talk) 07:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
BigHandking
Please do not contact me about the pictures which you uploaded from Bighandking's panoramio account...as I have No panoramio account. He licensed them as CC BY ND which is not usually permitted here since images with NC and ND restrictions are not allowed.
Big Hand King did not say that he allows this images to be used outside wikipedia or wikimedia which is why they have not been marked. That is the problem. I had posted a Message to an Admin here about them some days ago. Perhaps you should contact Admin MGA73 (who talked about them here) about the problem as I see he sent a message to Bighandking on the link you gave...but since Bighandking has refused to reply to his message, I predict your images of Chinese bridges will one day be failed by someone else. I cannot solve your problem and I have no intention in getting a panoramio account when I have one account at flickr. The best solution is to send a message to Bighandking asking if he will allow the images to be used outside wikipedia at the panoramio link you mentioned. So, either contact MGA73 or Bighandking. Maybe Bighandking could say "Yes I do" to mga73's message to him here on the 'cc by sa 3.0' license or use outside Wikimedia projects. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:27, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
- Bighandking has to say that he allows his images which he allowed to be used on wikipedia to also be used on other web sites on the same license ie (without derivative use restrictions as he specifies). That is the problem. Wikipedia/Wikicommons is a collection of free images and I have seen some of my images also used on other web sites. If he says: "I allow my images of bridges which are already used on wikipedia to be used on other web sites on the same license as above," then his photos would all be passed here. You can also contact Admin MGA73 if you want and he would likely say the same thing. Right now, he doesn't and the images can't be passed. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- I will pass the 14 images based on Admin MGA's message to me here. Please give me some time to pass them as I have to give a clear reason why I am passing them in the image talk page. This would apply only to the images current uploaded here. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hi! I copied the full permission to User talk:Glabb/BigHandking so we have a copy if the page should be deleted some day. Hope it is ok I "messed" your name space :-) --MGA73 (talk) 20:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: The existing images from Bighandking's account uploaded by July 1, 2010 have now been passed by me with a reason given in the image talk page. If you have any futher questions, pls ask Admin MGA73. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I have to give a very clear reason because this is not a typical case and in the hierarchy of Wikicommons, an Admin is more important than a trusted user. But no one has complained about my reasons or my work in passing images because I give all the long details. Thank you for taking the time to contact the author but please note that future images from Bighandking cannot be hosted here as he prohibits derivative use. Regards from Vancouver, Canada on July 1 (Canada Day--which explains why I have a bit more free time today) Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Jintang_Bridge_Zhejiang-edit.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
–Tryphon☂ 14:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
The copyright owner never said he allowed this image to be used for commercial uses on the panoramio link. So, someone will likely tag it for deletion one day in the future. Just to let you know. Please contact Admin MGA73 if you have any questions on WikiCommon's licensing policies. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Lianxiang_bridge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MGA73 (talk) 17:35, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:00, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
|
File:Verrazano-Narrows Bridge-1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.
|
- Sadly, the flickr user is not the photographer, see EXIF. Trycatch (talk) 09:23, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Glabb, please provide a valid source for this image File:Taishun Bai Hefei Bridge-2.jpg, otherwise the image will be eliminated. Truu (talk) 19:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Now it's all right, I corrected the source that was wrong. Truu (talk) 19:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment
I must ask Admin MGA73 here on your question. He would know the situation better. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:39, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: MGA73 made a reply to me here He has an account on panoramio unlike me. Next time you have a problem, you should contact him. I have no panoramio or picasa account. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Your Flickr uploads
Hello Glabb/Archive 1!
Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:
- Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
- You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the hole procedure much easier and faster for you!
Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 08:58, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Renommer un fichier
Bonjour. Pour renommer un fichier, utiliser ce modèle : {{Rename}}. Consulter cette page pour connaitre les règles d'utilisation de ce modèle. En vous remerciant. Crochet.david (talk) 15:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Category names should generally be in English
Hola
Category names should generally be in English, as in Commons:Categories#Category_names. Names of towns should be in the local languages, but the names you give to categories of bridges, unless there is a recognised local name, should be in English. Greetings --Javier ME (talk) 18:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC) Los nombres de las categorías deben estar generalmente en idioma inglés, según Commons:Categories#Category_names. Los nombres de las localidades deben ir en el idioma locla, pero los nombres que dés a las categorías de puentes, a no ser que haya un nombre propio local reconocido, deben ir en inglés. Salud --Javier ME (talk) 18:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Panoramio
Why are you able to upload the full resolution image from panoramio while a non-panoramio member only gets 500 X 350/375 pixels (or thereabouts)? Must one be a member to get the full resolution image....unlike flickr? Just curious. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: Yes, I suppose one must be a member of Panoramio or ipernity to access the full resolution image. I marked this image below but when I copied the image on the panoramio link (to see the resolution), it was only 500 X 375 pixels...which wasn't comparable in size to the picture you uploaded below. I am only a member of flickr but even non-members can upload the highest resolution image there via the magnifying glass. I generally avoid marking ipernity images...its too foreign for my tastes. But at least there is a picasa web bot that marks most picasa images. (though I don't know their rules for uploading high resolution images as I only upload images from flickr). But I do mark picasa images that have been cropped.
- File:Ottoman bridge- Nahr al-Kalb.jpg
Thanks for your kind reply, Regards from BC, Canada where its 12:36 AM, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Pont_de_Verdun_(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sémhur (talk) 14:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jingsaojiang Rongzhou bridge in Yibin.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jingsaojiang Rongzhou bridge in Yibin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ehuang Changjiang Bridge.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ehuang Changjiang Bridge.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ehuang Changjiang Bridge.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Junshan Bridge.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Junshan Bridge.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Junshan Bridge.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Junshan_Bridge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 05:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Ehuang_Changjiang_Bridge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MGA73 (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Jingsaojiang_Rongzhou_bridge_in_Yibin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MGA73 (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
Dear Glabb,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Band aid, Puente de la muerte.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Band aid, Puente de la muerte.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Band aid, Puente de la muerte.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
mabdul 12:45, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Pont_suspendu_de_Montjean-sur-Loire_(16).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JeanBono (talk) 10:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:24, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I add licences for the photo of french bridge (I'm sorry, I upload too fast !), all of them are in Category:Pont de Bohardy, thanks !--Glabb (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Glabb, I have moved your answer to here. The bot owner is hardly active and too busy.
- I have removed the "no license" warning at four files. You could do so by yourself if that happens the next time - of course only if you really have added a correct license. :-) If you like to respond, do it here, I watch. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 22:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you ! --Glabb (talk) 15:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Twin of mine (Bosphorus Bridge and Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Takabeg (talk) 07:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Zmajski most.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eleassar (t/p) 12:51, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 12:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 13:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 18:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Morning ☼ (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 15:37, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
File tagging File:Liuguanghe Bridge-1.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Liuguanghe Bridge-1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 14:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Liuguanghe Bridge-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 14:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Faulty upload from here? --Leoboudv (talk) 02:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Panoramio images
Hello!
Please upload images from panoramio in the highest resolution available there.
Thank you!
Regards, High Contrast (talk) 10:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 01:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Pedonale, arco centrale, Reggio Emilia, Italia 9237.jpg
- File:Pedonale, arco centrale, Reggio Emilia, Italia 9251.jpg
- File:Pedonale, arco centrale, Reggio Emilia, Italia1 9247.jpg
- File:Ponte di Calatrava sull'A1 Catatrava bridge over A1 motorway.jpg
- File:Ponte di Calatrava sull'A1 Catatrava bridge over A1 motorway1.jpg
- File:Ponte Nord, Reggio Emilia-ponte sospeso.jpg
Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 01:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Since this is a derivative of an image which passed flickr review, you can type in a link to the original image (as you did here), type in the correct commons license and remove the npd tag. That is all you need to do here. Unless, its a new image where you should type in a {{Flickrreview}} and the license. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 14:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Gefyra Riou 2- Antirriou 7-1-2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veggies (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Patras bridge, Rion-Antirion-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veggies (talk) 12:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Patras bridge, Rion-Antirion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veggies (talk) 12:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Rio bridge - wave 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veggies (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Rio Patras - GREECE - April 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veggies (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Rio-Antirio bridge EDIT.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veggies (talk) 12:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File:The Rio-Antirio bridge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veggies (talk) 12:22, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Rio-Antirrio Bridge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veggies (talk) 12:22, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Gefyra Riou 2- Antirriou 7-1-2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Rio Patras - GREECE - April 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Ueno Skybridge4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vantey ([[User talk:Vantey
|talk]]) 11:04, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Send a message to an Admin about copyvios
Maybe you can send the message you sent me to Admin Lymantria He is usually around. Maybe you can give an example. I am not an Admin ufortunately. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:28, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Would you care to comment on this mass DR of Bru216's images? Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
File:River and road bridge, Slovenia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 19:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Your transfer of Flickr photos to Commons
every knows and can see it: the Flickr-standard is very often far from Commons standard. Please delete the ones you did to "Gokteik Viaduct", they are bad. For that photos I did not write the german version. Thanks in advance! --- Haubi (talk) 13:46, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Nova Gorica 0720069 71-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Ayub bridge.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 11:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Considering copyvio via cropped from (as indicated) File:Sukkur Graves.jpg = Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sukkur Graves.jpg = https://www.flickr.com/photos/rajaislam/3268786225/ (01.2009, all rights reserved by Raja Islam). Gunnex (talk) 11:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Pasajul Basarab.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pasajul Basarab.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Leyo 18:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Ponts...
Salut Glabb.
Je n'en ai pas encore fini avec les catégorisations des ponts sur la Loire. Peux-tu me laisser quelques jours encore ? Ensuite, je reprendrai cette page en tableaux plus complets, sur le modèle de la section "Ponts principaux" (qui est d'ailleurs assez arbitraire à mon avis). À moins que ça ne te dise de le faire ?
Je compte faire pareil avec les ponts sur la Seine puis le Rhône, etc, alors, si tu t'ennuies, si il n'y aurait pas des cat's à créer .
Thank you. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Salut, désolé, je fais mes petites choses dans mon petit coin, j'ai publié la liste des ponts sur la Loire en tableau (qui va évoluer ces prochains jours). Les catégories, je les publies au besoin dès lors qu'il y a plus de 2 photos d'un ouvrage. Je me charge des photos pour les ponts de Loire (jusqu'à la Nièvre au moins!), il y aurait les articles à créer (c'était dans mon objectif mais plus tard) ou les photos à prendre pour la Seine et la Garonne mais c'est du boulot. Si tu as des remarques pour la liste des ponts de la Loire, n'hésite pas!
- Ce n'est pas bien de faire ses petites choses dans mon petit coin... Bon, j'ai fini avec les ponts de Loire ; ceux qui restent sans cat précise ne el sont que parce que je ne sais pas comment ils s'appellent ou que je n'ai pas trouvé à les ranger ; si tu peux faire mieux, tant mieux. Bonne semaine. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 23:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
File:KokonoeOtsurihashiSpec.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 20:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:NORTH EAST INDIA (73).jpg
- File:Pithoragarh to Dharchulha on Nepal border in Uttarakhand, India (126).jpg
- File:Pithoragarh to Dharchulha on Nepal border in Uttarakhand, India (128).jpg
- File:Pithoragarh to Dharchulha on Nepal border in Uttarakhand, India (128)2.jpg
- File:Pithoragarh to Dharchulha on Nepal border in Uttarakhand, India (130).jpg Martin H. (talk) 13:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Yellow River Bridge.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 15:46, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Da Nang Panorama 7 (18767400435).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Da Nang Panorama 7 (18767400435).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 16:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Thuan Phuoc Bridge (18146773833).jpg
#invoke:Autotranslate JuTa 05:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
#invoke:Autotranslate — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Gunnex (talk) 10:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2016 в Україні
Вітаємо!
Триває міжнародний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи.
Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінації: «Цивільні споруди доби Гетьманщини» та «Національний заповідник "Софія Київська"».
Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки», 10:24, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Запрошення на церемонію нагородження переможців фотоконкурсів ВЛП та ВЛЗ 3 грудня 2016
Доброї пори доби! Дякуємо за участь у фотоконкурсі/ах, що проходили за підтримки «Вікімедіа Україна», та запрошуємо на церемонію нагородження переможців «Вікі любить пам'ятки» та «Вікі любить Землю» 2016 року, що відбудеться 3 грудня (субота) у Національному музеї історії України (м. Київ, вул. Володимирська, 2), початок об 11:00. Подія у Facebook.
З повагою, оргкомітети конкурсів.--20:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JuTa 17:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JuTa 17:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JuTa 17:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Dear Glabb,
Any image from a US Federal government site is Public Domain. The category Virins gives the license for US military sites. I will mark your images. This image is from the USGS and is also public domain. Best, --Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- I had a bit of free time today but I will be busy soon. Best, --Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Daphne Lantier 07:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2017 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Ukraine
Вітаємо!
Запрошуємо взяти участь у міжнародному фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Звертаємо увагу, що завантажені матеріали будуть враховуватися у тій версії файлу, що був на час завершення конкурсу, тож якщо у Вас гарне фото, вантажте його одразу у високій роздільності. З регламентом конкурсу можна ознайомитися тут.
Якщо у Вас дуже багато фото, скористайтеся масовими завантажувачами або зверніться до нас.
Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінація для Ваших відеоматеріалів про пам'ятки. Якщо у Вас розмір відеофайлу завеликий для конкурсного завантажувача, спробуйте скористатися стандартним завантажувачем, але не забудьте поставити ідентифікатор пам'ятки. Якщо виникатимуть будь-які труднощі — пишіть нам на wlmTemplate:@wikimediaukraine.org.ua
Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 21:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Gunnex ([[User talk:Gunnex|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 84.250.17.211 15:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2018 в Україні
Вітаємо!
1 вересня вже традиційно стартувала українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Цього року є трохи змін у правилах конкурсу:
- фотографії пам'яток, для яких на момент початку конкурсу (відповідно до відомої Організаційному комітету інформації) не було жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт рівний 7 (для кожної пам'ятки);
- фотографії автоматично вантажаться у категорію, яка бере учать у номінації за найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації за найкраще фото потрібно вибрати необхідні налаштування у завантажувачі.
Також у конкурсі є спецномінація банерів для статей у Вікімандрах, детальніше за посиланням.
Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmTemplate:@wikimedia.org.ua – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 22:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JWilz12345 ([[User talk:JWilz12345|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JWilz12345 ([[User talk:JWilz12345|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Ще 4 дні до завершення «Вікі любить пам'ятки»
Привіт!
Наш цьогорічний конкурс добігає свого кінця — залишилося ще 4 дні. Проміжні підсумки конкурсу опубліковано на сайті. У нас зараз понад 13500 світлин, і це значить, що Україна посідає четверте місце, поступаючись Росії (23 тисячі), Німеччині (21 тисяча) та Італії (19 тисяч). Загалом, понад 200 учасників цього року уже. Дякуємо, що вантажили фото у попередні роки, якщо б Вам захотілося ще взяти участь цього року, то може бути корисно переглянути цей пост із покроковою інструкцією як вантажити світлини: «Як подати свою роботу на конкурс». Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Цього року у конкурсі також є ще одна спеціальні номінація — «Єврейська спадщина». Детальніше про неї можна прочитати за посиланням.
Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmTemplate:@wikimedia.org.ua – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».21:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)