Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Črni Kal viaduct

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Črni Kal viaduct

[edit]

1998 work by Janez Koželj and Marjan Pippenbaher. Nominated due to COM:FOP#Slovenia.

Eleassar (t/p) 13:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per an expert article,[1] (pg. 64, 2nd section) according to the Article 6 of the relevant act (ZASP 2007), all composing parts are equally protected. Therefore, if the image shows a composing part of the architectural work, like a column of a viaduct, per the currently valid Slovenian legislation (ZASP, Article 55, item 2) it can't be used for non-commercial purposes, which means (per COM:FOP and COM:SCOPE) that it doesn't belong to Commons. Per the same article (pg. 68, first section), the construction is a form of reproduction of the original plan. A spiritual creation is the original protected work, the plan is its material expression and the building is a derived work. Therefore  Delete. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:29, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why should be deleted this file? File:Crnikalviaduct.jpg This is my own work.--Jarba (talk) 23:36, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can't see any elements on this photo, that would contain threshold of originality. --Sporti (talk) 05:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think this image can be kept. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:19, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And there is at least one more like that - File:SORS-CrniKal.jpg. --Sporti (talk) 07:26, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I agree about keeping these two images. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How about File:Crni Kal viaduct construction.jpg? It shows the construction, not the finished work itself. --Miha (talk) 11:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See above. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: In Slovenia, "architecture" includes bridges (in many countries, including the USA, it does not). Copyright covers the whole of a work and all its parts -- the entire book and each paragraph. While we know that in France there is case law defining a TOO for architecture, there does not appear to be a TOO elsewhere. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

:Three restored: not enough originality. Yann (talk) 16:00, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Out of process - please wait for the UnDR. I tend to agree with you on File:Črni Kal gradnja 2002.JPG, but Eleassar and I agree that the other two are creative and he cites a source at the UnDR. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Črni_Kal_viaduct&oldid=178077298"