User talk:Espencat
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Filnik 22:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Vandalisme?
[edit]En Esta edició vas revertir un vandalisme? 12:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Image:Carrer-manca.gif i llicències
[edit]Has posat a Image:Carrer-manca.gif dues llicències diferents. És el que volies? Si li poses la PD ja no cal que n'hi posis cap altra com la GFDL, més restrictiva, perquè no s'aplicaria.--Pere prlpz (talk) 14:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- No calia posar-la dos cops, però si són iguals no hi ha problema. Si deixes en blanc el camp permission, hi apareix automàticament el text see below.
- Sobre les llicències, la PD és la menys restrictiva perquè es reutilitzi la foto fora de les viquipèdies, i les més restrictives són la {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} i la {{GFDL-self}}.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Consensus?
[edit]Dear Espencat: I would be delighted if you explained this[1] edition. I have another question. Is there a consensus in Wikimedia about the demomination País Valencià instead of Comunitat Valenciana? Where can I find the page of the discussion in which that consensus was reached? Thank you very much and good editions!--Balbo (talk) 09:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your explanations. Then I can see that there is not a clear consensus and that officiality, common use in English, Catalan and Spanish diverge and there is not a unique correct solution to the problems. So, wouldn´t it be easier to open that discussion somewhere in this Wikimedia to reach a consensus and then change all the pages better than being edit-warring once and again (I don´t say this for you)? I say it because there are some points that are constantly being changed and quarrelled, often using only the tool "revert" without an explanation, and they are widely known as controversial subjects, specially in the dichotomy Nationalism-No Nationalism?
- I would be delighted to participate in that open discussion, but I don´t konw the proceedings. Thank you very much for your kindness.
- Yours sincerely,
CategoryValencia
[edit]No te sentit, si la pàgina principal es anomena "Espanya", que els enllaços interns diguin "Estat espanyol". És una pèrdua de temps, i contrari a l'esperit de Wikipedia. Si hi ha consens per a que la pàgina principal sigui "Espanya", no hi ha motius per a que els textos diguin qualsevol altra cosa.
Si hi ha debat sobre si la denominació ha de ser "Espanya" o "Estat espanyol", en principi, és una afirmació seva, i no te fonts. De tota manera, ha de recordar que a la Wikipedia no hi ha polítiques per a no ofendre sensibilitats; en tot cas, la política que existeix és la que regula la utilització de fonts.
Sobre si és "País valencià" o "Comunitat valenciana", és lo mateix. Estem a un projecte multicultural, on és necesari no confondre al personal. Un allemany, un paquistani, un senegalés que mai no va pisar en la seva vida ni Espanya ni València ni, fins i tot, els malnomenats "països catalans" no te moltes possibilitats de saber que és això del "Pais valencià", però si que en te de conèixer que és la "Comunitat valenciana": només ha de consultar una enciclopèdia, un atlas...
Finalment, jo crec que utilitzar eufemismes com "estat espanyol" o "pais valencià" serveix per acontentar les sensibilitats dels nacionalismes perifèrics, i com tal ferramenta per a contentar eixes sensibilitats, són una violació a punt de vista neutral. Dir Espanya és lo mateix que dir Argentina, dir Brasil, dir França, etc., no te cap càrrega més (per al 99.99% de la humanitat, en tot cas...). Dir Comunitat valenciana és lo mateix que dir Província de Buenos Aires, Lima, etc., i tampoc no te cap càrrega més (per al 99.99% de la humanitat, també, en tot cas).
Salutacions cordials. Ferbr1 (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Si podem parlar en català o (fins i tot!) en castellà, no te molt sentit parlar en anglès. De tota manera, si et sents més feliç, endavant, pots respondre-m en aglès.
No vas respondre-m els meus arguments. Perquè, si la pàgina original és "Espanya", cal utilitzar el eufemisme (eufemismo no perquè sigui incorrecta l'expresió, que evidentment no ho és, sino perquè s'utilitza per evitar un altra expresió, dir directament "Espanya" com el 99.99% de la humanitat) només per a evitar agreir sentiments? Home..., amés de no respectar el nom de la pàgina original, és una violació de punt de vista neutral.
Quan parles de l'ús habitual a català, que fonts tens per a fer eixa afirmació? A València, els catalanoparlants normalment diuen "Comunitat valenciana" sense problemes, i només els independentistes i alguns socialistes i tal fan ús del terme "pais valencià". Realment, hui, no són molts... Per altra banda, dir que parlar d'Espanya o de "Comunitat valenciana" és tan sols una transcripció sin fonament, una coincidència artificial..., en fi..., vas llegir l'Estatut de la Comunitat valenciana?
De tota manera, els teus arguments no són ho que realment penses. Al cap i a la fi, el únic que t'importa és invisibilitzar Espanya i Comunitat valenciana, oi, perquè argumentar amb coses amb les quals no et creus res? Ferbr1 (talk) 13:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
De tota manera, deixem-lo estar. És una discussió interminable. Fes el que vulguis. Saluts. Ferbr1 (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Del-req
[edit]Please first read how to do deletion-requests correctly before doing them. abf /talk to me/ 14:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Pancràtor_de_taüll.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Espencat (talk) 23:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Template:Bad name
[edit]Crec que pel que vols fer amb el "Pancràtor" et pot fer més servei la plantilla {{Bad name}}.--Pere prlpz (talk) 00:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Imatge del mes
[edit]Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Riu serpis a vilallonga.jpg is uncategorized since 23 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Móbilis_darrere.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 13:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Móbilis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 13:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Espencat,
Your picture Flors alpines al cim de la muntanya de Parcent is not a Colchicum (as it was first classified) but a Crocus serotinus subsp. salzmannii. I have reclassified it accordingly.
This is the first picture on Commons of this subspecies, which is growing on Spain and Morocco. I have put it on the Crocus pages of the French, Dutch and English wikipedia.
Botanically yours, --Réginald (To reply) 16:41, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Bressola (prada).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
File:L10-VAL.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 08:22, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
File:L1-VAL.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Víctor (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:L2-VAL.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Víctor (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:L3-VAL.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Víctor (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:L4-VAL.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Víctor (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:L5-VAL.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Víctor (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:L6-VAL.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Víctor (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:L7-VAL.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Víctor (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:L8-VAL.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Víctor (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
File:MetroValencia-logo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |