User talk:Ephraim33

Image:Image-Barfus, Hans Albrecht von (1635-1704) oil painting2.jpg

Hallo, mir ist aufgefallen, dass du für dieses Bild eine Genehmigung eingeholt hast, andererseits aber den "Public Domain"-Baustein verwendet hast. Das Bild ist nicht PD wegen dem Rahmen, der kein zweidimensionales Bildelement darstellt. Es wäre wünschenswert, wenn du den Lizenzbaustein gemäß der per E-Mail erteilten Erlaubnis ändern könntest. --Phrood 21:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gemacht. Hättest du aber auch gleich selbst berichtigen können ;-) --Ephraim33 14:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Papyrus Westcar

Hello there!

Yes, the original image I posted to the Wikimedia Commons was a merger of two photos that were stitched together using PhotoShop. I also have it as a single image, standing slightly further back in order to get a decent reference image, so that is also available as well.

Judging by your User Page I am guessing that you are interested in further tweaking the image. If so, please be my guest!

In order to not further clutter up the Commons with duplicate files, I have uploaded the unprocessed files to http://www.captmondo.com/Ephraim33/.

Cheers from a snowy Toronto!

Thank you very much! --Ephraim33 16:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Friedel,_Ernst1.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Friedel,_Ernst1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ALE! ¿…? 16:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Image:OCR-A sample.svg and Image:OCR-B sample.svg

Correct. Bye.GJo 19:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gerardus Mercator2.jpg

Hallo, you've uploaded a picture of Gerardus Mercator in 2005. While scanning old books during an Project of German Wikipedia, I found this picture in an German book from 1936. You have given "Frans Hogenberg" as author whether in my book there is Hendrik Goltzius given as author. Could you please check the book where you've been scanning the picture from? -- MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 13:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ich muss das Buch aber erst bestellen, dauert also eine Weile. --Ephraim33 (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gut - woher haste den das Buch? (reine Neugier) MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 15:22, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Das Buch habe ich jetzt bestellt. Leider habe ich es nicht persönlich, sondern nur meine Bibliothek (aber im Magazin - deshalb muss ich es bestellen). Und auch nur den Nachdruck von 1968, nicht das Original. Auf bildindex.de gibt es auch das Mercator-Bild (dort nach "mercator" suchen: einmal von "Goltzius, Hendrick" und einmal von "Hogenberg, Franz (Zuschreibung)". Uni Frankfurt bietet ein nachgemachtes Bild:

http://edocs.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2001/8000282/

und die Deutsche Fotothek:

Goltzius, Hendrick + Karte
und Goltzius, Hubert + Karte.

--Ephraim33 (talk) 17:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also: In dem Buch steht als Bildunterschrift "I. Portrait of Mercator at the age of 62, engraved by Frans Hogenberg, 1574". Ob diese Angabe den wirklichen Stecher nennt, kann ich allerdings auch nicht sagen. Vielleicht würde es helfen lateinisch zu können: In der Bildunterschrift im Bild selbst steht "Franc. Hog.". Aus dem Zusammenhang könnte man vielleicht deuten, ob dies der Künstlername oder etwas anderes ist. Immerhin nennen ja viele andere Quellen Goltzius. --Ephraim33 (talk) 16:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brandt,_Willy_(1913-1992).jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Brandt,_Willy_(1913-1992).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Polarlys (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beckett, Samuel (1906-1989).jpg

You've uploaded a derivative work

We're sorry, but File:Beckett, Samuel (1906-1989).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Please note that Freedom of Panorama in the UK does not apply to 2D murals. --dave pape (talk) 04:55, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedman, Milton (1912-2006).jpg

File deletion warning

File:Friedman, Milton (1912-2006).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Infrogmation (talk) 04:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 1e58d2bc147f3a582fe1c0969c1e0cf3

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Ephraim33!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:50, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gallandi, Johannes (1843-1917).jpg is uncategorized since 15 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:50, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Contessa, Karl Wilhelm Salice (1777-1825).jpg is uncategorized since 25 May 2009.
Image:Puttkamer, Georg Ludwig von (1715-1759).jpg is uncategorized since 26 July 2009.
Image:Puttkamer, Georg-Henning von (1721-1814).jpg is uncategorized since 26 July 2009.
Image:Leichhardt Falls1.jpg was uncategorized on 26 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Map of Bohemia in 1791 by Reilly 100.jpg was uncategorized on 19 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:39, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grassi,_Josef_Maria_-_Auguste_Charlotte_Gräfin_von_Kielmannsegge.jpg

File:Grassi,_Josef_Maria_-_Auguste_Charlotte_Gräfin_von_Kielmannsegge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 16:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you redirecting pages to categories?

Why? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I won't ask why, I've just revoked your actions. First, I can see no good reason for cross-namespace redirections (but I could be proved wrong on this one). More important, your edits just blanked the work of other contributors. This loss of information is just plain vandalism, so if it was a mistake, please pay attention, and if it wasn't, please don't do that again. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 10:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For example pages like Potsdam Conference, Charles Louis Alphonse Laveran, Robert Bárány or Karl Landsteiner have absolutely no real value above the category. And a lot of people taking care of categories, but almost no one takes care of these pages. So categories are usually in good shape, whereas pages often are not. Only when there are more than a few files, these pages make sence, since you can sort the files in different order, use captions and so on (example Albert Einstein). By the why, I find it kind of rude, to don't give me the time to answer your first question, but revert everything. --Ephraim33 (talk) 10:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I revert because it is vandalism. You're pushing your own personal opinion about galleries and categories (in spite of the existing polls about galleries and categories, none of them asking for the suppression of existing galleries) by introducing non-standard redirects and blanking other people's work. This is just an obvious motive for reversion. --Eusebius (talk) 10:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show me such polls about galleries and categories?

Sure. Commons:Galleries, Commons:Images on normal pages or categories:Vote, Commons:Categories vs Galleries. There may be a lot more, this is a hot issue and has always been so.

I don't thing these redirects are non-standard. At least I have seen them from time to time, for eample Jitzchak Rabin, Milton Friedman and Albert Schweitzer.

An object of a given nature "replaced" (through symbolic linking) by an object of another nature is somewhat unnatural, and very uncommon on this project. "There are some already" is not a very strong argument, I'm sure you understand it ("category redirections" exist, but please don't create any, they're only left behind after category deletions). However, to the best of my knowledge, there is no clear policy about it (hence my disclaimer in my first message), so you're really welcome if you want to start a debate about it on the village pump in order to clarify the situation.

I don't think I have destroyed other people's work, because there was basically no work in Karl Landsteiner et al.

Before your edit, a gallery was there, and after your edit, the gallery had disappeared: you cause harm to people working with galleries preferentially to categories. This is often the case for content reusers, since galleries are (normally) collections of selected and organized content, by opposition to the unsorted bunch of c... categories can be sometimes.

For people who are searching for images, these redirects are more helpful than the previous pages (only in these cases I have replaced the page by a redirect. If the page was ok, I haven't done anything). I can not imagine anyone who thinks Karl Landsteiner is more helpful for the users than Category:Karl Landsteiner. So why keeping unuseful stuff? Only because it was there?

--Ephraim33 (talk) 11:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, some people find galleries more useful. It's not your case, it's not mine either if you want to know, but it's apparently the case of many people who have expressed strong views in historical polls and have given a place to galleries in the organization of Commons. If you think a gallery should be deleted for some reason, it must go through a deletion request. You can't decide to blank stub galleries because they are not good/pretty/whatever are your own criteria. Instead, you are very much welcome to improve them by selecting better pictures or organizing them in thematic sections. And if you think galleries as a whole are useless, please just ignore them, but please be aware that the latest significant poll asked for a technical merge of the notions of gallery and category. Mediawiki is obviously far from that, but reading the discussions I've pointed to you can be instructive, I've myself learned a lot about how people consider galleries and categories, and taught myself to respect their point of view and the way they use Commons. --Eusebius (talk) 12:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was soll das?

File:Reilly_360.jpg wo soll diese Karte verwendet werden? Erkennst du was auf der Karte? --Devilm25 (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Die Karte muss noch nicht verwendet werden. Und: nein ich erkenne auch kaum etwas auf der Karte. Mir geht es zunächst darum, ein möglichst vollständiges Werkverzeichnis von Reilly zusammenzustellen. Sobald ich bessere Versionen finde, werden die Minibilder natürlich ersetzt, so wie File:Reilly 391.jpg. --Ephraim33 (talk) 14:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warum dann die Karte als "Platzhalter" hochladen. Bringt doch nix. Außer das man sagen kann: Jap ich hab alle. But sorry leider könnt ihr mit den meisten nix anfangen. --Devilm25 (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Selbst aus den kleinen Bildern kann der Kartenkundige Nutzen ziehen. Man kann die Titelkartuschen untersuchen (die scheinbar für jede Karte individuell angefertigt wurde; was sich aber erst beweisen lässt, wenn man alle Karten vor Augen hat - und sei es nur durch solch kleine Bilder), die Kolorierung, den Blattaufbau und als Ortskundiger auch ungefähr das dargestellte Gebiet. Die Karte ist also mehr als bloßer Platzhalter und hat ein Recht für sich selbst. Außerdem erleichtert sie mir die Arbeit, da ich bei diesen Karten schon den Titel und die Nummer mit Bibliothekskatalogen verglichen habe und dies nicht mehr tun muss, wenn sich die Gelegenheit bietet, eine größere Version hochzuladen. Zudem nimmt sie ja nicht gerade viel Speicherplatz weg ;-) --Ephraim33 (talk) 16:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exkursion der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte 1885(2).jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Doppellipidschicht.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Doppellipidschicht.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Doppellipidschicht.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Suhadi Sadono (talk) 12:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucas, Robert Emerson Jr. (1937).jpg

File:Lucas, Robert Emerson Jr. (1937).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Leoboudv (talk) 04:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Hodgkin image

Thanks for your message about the Alan Hodgkin image. Yes, I could easily remove that image from the videos, however, copyright law was designed to promote progress in science, not promote copyright paranoia. My videos are obviously educational in nature. If the Wikimedia Foundation is unable to exercise common sense then just delete the files. --JWSchmidt (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Prince-Ghazi-no-2-Shmagh-23-12-03.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Prince-Ghazi-no-2-Shmagh-23-12-03.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Prince-Ghazi-no-2-Shmagh-23-12-03.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ephraims Blume der Woche

THANK YOU so much for presenting me with your prestigous 'Ephraims Blume der Woche" Flower Award! And it's an honor to be your first Internationl recepiant. I'm glad you enjoy my photos - I try to capture and present everyone at their best. I'm adding this Award to my profile. -Glenn Toglenn (talk) 08:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People kissing objects

Wer kommt nur auf so was?--Symposiarch (talk) 14:08, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cairngaan

Hi Ephraim33, Category:Cairngaan is one of a number of bot created categories of places in the United Kingdom, the main reason for this was in relation to the bot transfer of properly licensed files from the geograph project. in this case [1] either the bot hasn't gotten around to them yet or they're here waiting to be sorted. There are a large number of these empty categories, which on the surface may seem superfulous but are useful. Having categorised geograph images myself, its great to be able to find the exact category you need without having to create the branch for it.

I've temporarily removed the speedy template you added to the category. If you feel strongly enough about it please feel free to reinstate it. KTo288 (talk) 09:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I see an empty category, I try to fill it (here, here, here, here, here). If there is no file, neither here nor (tranferable files) in any other wikipedia, I think there is no point in keeping this empty category. And in fact it would make my life easier, if empty categories without the possibility to fill them, would simply not exist. Since I look for empty categories using google, I would not have to check them over and over again. And since they are bot-created no work is lost. They can be recreated easily by any admin. But I will not fight for this. --Ephraim33 (talk) 09:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Railway line 039 (Czech Republic)

Stellst du bitte den von dir gelöschten Inhalt der Kat wieder her? Sie ist nicht "leer", wie von dir angegeben. --91.14.165.43 20:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiederherstellen kann ichs zwar nicht (können nur Admins), aber den Inhalt habe ich wieder rekonstruiert. --Ephraim33 (talk) 07:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedel,_Ernst2.jpg

File:Friedel,_Ernst2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Masur (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedel,_Ernst1.jpg

File:Friedel,_Ernst1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Masur (talk) 15:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cat 19xx Deutsche Bundespost stamps

Hallo Ephraim, gute Idee, das mit dem Anlegen der neuen cats "19xx Deutsche Bundespost stamps". Bis zu welchem Jahr, dachtest du denn, dass diese umbenannten cats laufen sollen? Bis 1990 J.d.d.Einheit? bis 1995 DBP->DPAG? 2001 DM->€? Ich frage, weil ich noch'n paar 1993 und 1994 (vllt. noch heute) hochladen möchte und dann kann man sich doppelte Arbeit sparen und gleich in eine neue cat stellen. Sonst, mach gerne so weiter ;-) Gruß NobbiP talk 12:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich weiß auch nicht so genau, hatte aber eher an 1995 gedacht, aber 1990 ist vielleicht logischer (danach gab's ja nur noch ein Deutschland). Was meinst du denn? --Ephraim33 (talk) 12:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tja, 2001 eher nicht, soweit klar. Würde sonst auch eher sagen 1990 und dann ggf. die Jahre 1991..1994 "renamen" auf die neuen Namen ? und ab 1995 stimmts dann ja wieder. Gruß NobbiP talk 13:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe jetzt die Kategorien bis "1990 Deutsche Bundespost stamps" angelegt. Was wir mit den anderen machen, können wir ja immer noch entscheiden. Umbenennen ist ja sehr einfach machbar. --Ephraim33 (talk) 14:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...schon gesehen, super Fleißarbeit, Danke. Ja, und das Umbenennen stossen wir gelegentlich an. Schönes WE, Gruß NobbiP talk 14:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe gesehen, dass du schon die restlichen Jahrgänge der Bundespost vorbereitest (1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994). Wann gehen die denn online? (Wahrscheinlich musst du noch viele selbst einscannen. Die Qualität der bisherigen Bilder ist ja sehr unterschiedlich, zum Teil gestempelt, oft sehr klein. Da lobe ich mir doch deine Bilder, die immer postfrisch sind und so, dass man alle Details erkennen kann.) Und gibt es eigentlich ein Bundespost-Pendent zu de:Briefmarkenblocks der Deutschen Post der DDR? --Ephraim33 (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, die Marken von Bund_93 habe ich fertig, muss ich nur noch hochladen, vielleicht schaffe ich das heute noch. 94 ist gescanned muss ich aber noch aufarbeiten, 90-92 stelle ich dann erst zusammen mit 94 in den ANR, die werde ich dann im nachhinein noch ein wenig "aufhübschen". DDR, ja da ist Kollege nightflyer dran, dass sind aber so viele Marken, dass dauert wohl noch was (ein paar fertige Jahrgänge gibts aber schon). Danke auch fürs sortieren in den cats ;-) NobbiP talk 16:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perelman, Grigori (1966).jpg

File:Perelman, Grigori (1966).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hekerui (talk) 08:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's no copyvio. Please see Category:Pictures from Oberwolfach Photo Collection (Bergman). --Ephraim33 (talk) 08:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see File talk:Perelman, Grigori (1966).jpg. Are there other GFDL images that you uploaded as "relicense" even though they were uploaded after August 2009? Hekerui (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how people should find the category on their own, it's hidden. Hekerui (talk) 08:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I copied the licence from another Bergman picture, which was maybe uploaded before August 2009. (I did not know that licences can have a best before date ;-) I have no idea if I have done the same in any other picture. Most files I upload are already in public domain. Is there any possibility to find all my GFDL images? Bay the way, you can make hidden categories visible in your "preferences" -> "Appearance" -> "Show hidden categories". --Ephraim33 (talk) 08:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! The criteria are in the migration guide. However, I don't really get why the MGA73bot2 marked File:Young theodore kaczynski.jpeg as ineligible, unlike the Perelman pic it was uploaded prior to the migration deadline. As for your images, I went over your uploads up to August 2009 with Special:ListFiles and couldn't find another image from the Oberwolfach Photo Collection that was problematic. However, you used flickr to upload for example File:Whale tail.jpg. Flickr image licenses have to be checked by a bot or a "trusted" user and be marked as such. Normally, if you use an assist to upload a flickr image, you are automatically given the Template:flickrreview. Best Hekerui (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmpf, du sprichst deutsch, warum hab ich das nicht gleich gesehen! Hekerui (talk) 08:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging empty NoUploads categories

Hi Ephrami33, I noticed you tagged the empty Category:William Logsdail for deletion. However, this category exists in order to remind people that this artist's works are not in the public domain, and to help detect uploads that need to be deleted. Please don't tag categories for deletion that have the {{NoUploads}} tag on the category description page. Thank you! Dcoetzee (talk) 20:17, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

from User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_0000.jpg with File:Schauplatz der fünf Theile der Welt - Reilly 0000.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_0001.jpg with File:Schauplatz der fünf Theile der Welt first section title page - Reilly 0001.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_0005.jpg with File:Schauplatz der fünf Theile der Welt second section title page - Reilly 0005.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_013.jpg with File:Map of Wallachia in 1791 by Reilly 013.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_014.jpg with File:Map of Bulgaria in 1791 by Reilly 014.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_015.jpg with File:Map of Bulgaria in 1791 by Reilly 015.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_016.jpg with File:Map of Romania in 1791 by Reilly 016.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_017.jpg with File:Map of Macedonia in 1791 by Reilly 017.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_018.jpg with File:Map of the Aegean Sea in 1791 by Reilly 018.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_021.jpg with File:Map of Albania in 1791 by Reilly 021.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_022.jpg with File:Map of Albania in 1791 by Reilly 022.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_023.jpg with File:Map of Boeotia in 1791 by Reilly 023.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_024.jpg with File:Map of Dalmatia in 1791 by Reilly 024.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_024b.jpg with File:Map of Dalmatia in 1791 by Reilly 024b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_025.jpg with File:Map of Dalmatia in 1791 by Reilly 025.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_026.jpg with File:Map of Dalmatia in 1791 by Reilly 026.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_026b.jpg with File:Map of Dalmatia in 1791 by Reilly 026b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_028.jpg with File:Map of Hungary in 1791 by Reilly 028.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_028b.jpg with File:Map of Hungary in 1791 by Reilly 028b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_030.jpg with File:Map of Hungary in 1791 by Reilly 030.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_031b.jpg with File:Map of Hungary in 1791 by Reilly 031b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_032.jpg with File:Map of Hungary in 1791 by Reilly 032.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_032b.jpg with File:Map of Hungary in 1791 by Reilly 032b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_033.jpg with File:Map of Hungary in 1791 by Reilly 033.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_035.jpg with File:Map of Galicia in 1791 by Reilly 035.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_037.jpg with File:Map of Galicia in 1791 by Reilly 037.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_038.jpg with File:Map of Poland and Lithuania in 1791 by Reilly 038.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_040.jpg with File:Map of Poland in 1791 by Reilly 040.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_041.jpg with File:Map of Poland in 1791 by Reilly 041.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_042.jpg with File:Map of Poland in 1791 by Reilly 042.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_043.jpg with File:Map of Poland in 1791 by Reilly 043.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_044.jpg with File:Map of Poland in 1791 by Reilly 044.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_045.jpg with File:Map of Poland in 1791 by Reilly 045.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_046.jpg with File:Map of Poland in 1791 by Reilly 046.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_047.jpg with File:Map of Lithuania in 1791 by Reilly 047.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_048.jpg with File:Map of Lithuania in 1791 by Reilly 048.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_049.jpg with File:Map of Lithuania in 1791 by Reilly 049.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_050.jpg with File:Map of Lithuania in 1791 by Reilly 050.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_051.jpg with File:Map of Prussia in 1791 by Reilly 051.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_054.jpg with File:Map of Prussia in 1791 by Reilly 054.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_053.jpg with File:Map of Prussia in 1791 by Reilly 053.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_055.jpg with File:Map of Prussia in 1791 by Reilly 055.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_058.jpg with File:Map of Pomerania in 1791 by Reilly 058.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_059.jpg with File:Map of Courland in 1791 by Reilly 059.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_062.jpg with File:Map of Novorossiya in 1791 by Reilly 062.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_064.jpg with File:Map of European Russia in 1791 by Reilly 064.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_066.jpg with File:Map of European Russia in 1791 by Reilly 066.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_067.jpg with File:Map of Northern Europe in 1791 by Reilly 067.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless names

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_068.jpg with File:Map of Sweden in 1791 by Reilly 068.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_069.jpg with File:Map of Sweden in 1791 by Reilly 069.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_070.jpg with File:Map of Sweden in 1791 by Reilly 070.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_071.jpg with File:Map of Denmark in 1791 by Reilly 071.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_072.jpg with File:Map of Denmark in 1791 by Reilly 072.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_074.jpg with File:Map of Denmark in 1791 by Reilly 074.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_076.jpg with File:Map of Iceland in 1791 by Reilly 076.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_077.jpg with File:Map of Greenland in 1791 by Reilly 077.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_078.jpg with File:Map of the United Kingdom in 1791 by Reilly 078.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_079.jpg with File:Map of England in 1791 by Reilly 079.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_080.jpg with File:Map of England in 1791 by Reilly 080.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_081.jpg with File:Map of England in 1791 by Reilly 081.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_082.jpg with File:Map of England in 1791 by Reilly 082.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_084.jpg with File:Map of England in 1791 by Reilly 084.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_085.jpg with File:Map of Wales in 1791 by Reilly 085.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_086.jpg with File:Map of Scotland in 1791 by Reilly 086.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_088.jpg with File:Map of Scotland in 1791 by Reilly 088.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_088b.jpg with File:Map of Scotland in 1791 by Reilly 088b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_089.jpg with File:Map of Ireland in 1791 by Reilly 089.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_091.jpg with File:Map of Ireland in 1791 by Reilly 091.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_092.jpg with File:Map of Germany and Switzerland in 1791 by Reilly 092.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_092b.jpg with File:Map of Germany and Switzerland in 1791 by Reilly 092b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_093.jpg with File:Map of the Holy Roman Empire‎ by Reilly 093.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_093b.jpg with File:Map of the Holy Roman Empire‎ by Reilly 093b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_094.jpg with File:Map of Central Europe in 1791 by Reilly 094.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_095.jpg with File:Map of Bohemia in 1791 by Reilly 095.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_096.jpg with File:Map of Bohemia in 1791 by Reilly 096.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_099b.jpg with File:Map of Bohemia in 1791 by Reilly 099b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_101.jpg with File:Map of Bohemia in 1791 by Reilly 101.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_101b.jpg with File:Map of Bohemia in 1791 by Reilly 101b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_102.jpg with File:Map of Bohemia in 1791 by Reilly 102.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_102b.jpg with File:Map of Bohemia in 1791 by Reilly 102b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_105.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 105.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_107.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 107.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_108.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 108.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_108b.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 108b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_109.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 109.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_109b.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 109b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_110.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 110.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_111.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 111.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_112.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 112.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_113.jpg with File:Map of Silesia in 1791 by Reilly 113.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_114.jpg with File:Map of Moravia in 1791 by Reilly 114.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_115.jpg with File:Map of Moravia in 1791 by Reilly 115.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_116.jpg with File:Map of Moravia in 1791 by Reilly 116.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_117.jpg with File:Map of Moravia in 1791 by Reilly 117.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_118.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791 by Reilly 118.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_119.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791 by Reilly 119.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_120.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791 by Reilly 120.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_121.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791-1792 by Reilly 121.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_122.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791-1792 by Reilly 122.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_123.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791-1792 by Reilly 123.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_124.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791-1792 by Reilly 124.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_125.jpg with File:Map of Vienna in 1791-1792 by Reilly 125.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_126.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791-1792 by Reilly 126.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_127.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791-1792 by Reilly 127.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_128.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791-1792 by Reilly 128.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_129.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791-1792 by Reilly 129.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

CommonsDelinker: Replace File:Reilly_129b.jpg with File:Map of Austria in 1791-1792 by Reilly 129b.jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: File renamed: meaningless name

--Ephraim33 (talk) 19:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reilly's maps

Hi Ephraim33 !

I renamed these files according to the renaming guidelines, which express that a "change from completely meaningless names into suitable names, according to what the image displays" should be made (# 2).

If you don't agree with the way I renamed these files, please request new names and do so til the bottom of the category.

Best, Papatt (talk) 22:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that you consider only your point of view. OK, you know that Reilly was a cartographer who made a lot of maps but what about others ?

Maybe you didn't notice that Reilly is the name of many people and some places too. So if these names weren't "completely meaningless" in your mind, they were at least misleading, another undisputed reason to rename a file (i. e. # 3). Of course this still applies to the not yet renamed Reilly files.

However, I'll let you some time to find someone relevant to approve your point of view and deny mine before going on what I began.

Please also notice that renaming back isn't this easy. The redirection has to be deleted before a renaming can be done, that means three operations and at least two persons are needed to proceed (1 : ask for deletion - 2 : deletion - 3 : renaming).

With this in mind, you'll understand that the shortest way to an homogenous status isn't the way back.

Best, Papatt (talk) 10:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please agree that I couldn't assume my renamings would be disputed since I had at least one undisputed reason (according to the renaming guidelines) to do so. My choices can be disputed, I can agree too.

OK, I can agree with your choice, but I'd like to suggest "File:Reilly's map Nr <number>.jpg" and, for the "<number>X" maps, something more meaningful like "File:Reilly's map Nr <number> coloured.jpg" (to be checked since I noticed some differences).

I'd be glad you ask for some more help by formally requesting renaming by means of the template {{rename|Reilly's map Nr <number>.jpg|Uploader requested}} (where <number> will be explicited), especially for the "<number>X" files and relatives.

According to that, I'll follow your guideline (with the "harmonize" reason) while other filemovers will deal with your formal requests. Please let me know if (and how) you agree by pointing to your first requests.

Best, Papatt (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind, it's up to you. Papatt (talk) 21:22, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raymond Davis 1978.jpg

File:Raymond Davis 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bomazi (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sakharov, Andrei (1921-1989).jpg

File:Sakharov, Andrei (1921-1989).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ephraim33 Self Portrait.jpg

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 22:25, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ephraims Blume der Woche

Herzlichen Dank für die Blume der Woche, die, wenn ich es richtig gesehen haben, zum ersten Mal in der Geschichte eine Schnecke war, also genau genommen eine Schnecke der Woche. So ein Lob spornt natürlich an, und ich habe noch eine ganze Reihe weiterer Schneckenschalen "auf Lager", die darauf warten, fotografiert zu werden. Es wird also weiterhin neue Schneckenbilder geben. --Llez (talk) 13:52, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Juchu! Weitere Schnecken! Ja du hast recht, es war die erste "Schnecke der Woche" ;-) Einen Schmetterling gab es schon einmal (Woche 30), und ein verstecktes Tierchen (Woche 34), sonst gibt es eigentlich immer pure Blumen. Aber wenn es passt, versuche ich mit dem Bild irgendeine Beziehung zum Blumenempfänger herzustellen - und da hat "Schnecke mit Blume" bei dir natürlich gepasst. Und die hast du redlich verdient. Ich bin zwar kein Fotograf, aber ich kann mir vorstellen, wie viel Arbeit, Mühe und Liebe zum Detail in den Bildern steckt. --Ephraim33 (talk) 15:42, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jerome Karle.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jerome Karle.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 08:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:DR 1930 IX Bauwerke Burg Rheinstein (Fälschung).jpg

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 12:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russian Empire-World War I-Banknote-0.02-Obverse.png and other

Please note that banknotes could be in fraction of currencies. I stated this in file names, so it's not necessary to know language. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you are right. But on the banknote it's written 2 kopecks (and not 0.02 rubles) so the category is Banknotes with a face value of 2 (and not Category:Banknotes with a face value of 0.02). --Ephraim33 (talk) 14:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But 1 kopeck = 0.01 ruble. Currency is ruble. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The value (the number on the banknote) is 2. The unit (kopeks or rubles or cent or dollars) does not matter. It's the similar to the 2 kopek coins like File:2 копейки СССР 1988 г.jpg, which can be found in Category:Coins with a face value of 2. --Ephraim33 (talk) 14:39, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

fyi Geo Swan (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Holevo, Alexander2.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Holevo, Alexander2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Wdwd (talk) 19:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

centuries

Thanks! --DPC (talk) 08:44, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Human scrotum

Human scrotum has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ 01:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramelow, Bodo (1956).jpg

File:Ramelow, Bodo (1956).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martina talk 06:04, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suttinger, Karl Benedikt (1746-1830).jpg

Hello! You uploaded the above file of Karl Benedikt Suttinger (my ancestor, thanks for the upload!) and I would like to see the rest of the book it was from, or at least the page that the picture comes (hoping that it includes more information). I was wondering if you knew where I could find the book. I can't seem to find it online; do you have a copy I could purchase or would you be willing to send me pictures by any chance?

Thanks for any information, Adam — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.12.205.35 (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Souvenirblatt

Hallo, die von dir bereits vor längerer Zeit gebildete Kategorie enspricht nicht den Gepflogenheiten auf Commons. Da es sich hier nicht um einen Eigennamen handelt, muss der Name internatioanl verwendbar, also englisch sein. Finde die englische Entsprechung heraus und bilde die Kategorie neu. Außerdem muss der Name im Plural formuliert sein. Falls du dies nicht in absehbarer Zeit tust, wird die Kategorie gelöscht. --Mewa767 (talk) 00:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Es gibt keinen englischen Begriff: https://dict.leo.org/englisch-deutsch/Souvenirblatt --Ephraim33 (talk) 16:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn es ein Wort bei Leo nicht gibt, heißt es noch lange nicht, dass es keinen englischen Begriff gibt. Du hast das Wort Souvenirblatt nicht gefunden, aber das Wort existiert ja doch. Souvenierblatt ist ein sehr spezielles Wort und es überrascht nicht, Leo ist kein Fachwörterbuch. Solche Souvenierblätter waren nicht nur im deutschsprachigen Raum verbreitet und in England wurden sie sicher nicht mit dem deutschen Wort bezeichnet. Du müsstest also in Commons unter den entsprechenden Bildern aus dem englischsprachigen Raum oder in der einschlägigen englischsprachigen Literatur danach suchen. Also ich lasse dir noch etwas Zeit. Gruß --Mewa767 (talk) 23:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Banknotes_of_North_Korea

Banknotes of North Korea has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ox1997cow (talk) 04:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Circumcised_and_uncircumcised_human_penises_in_comparison

Circumcised and uncircumcised human penises in comparison has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 11:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stamps of the Faroe Islands

We need images for Jens Christian Svabo (2010) and 2017 onward. Can you help with this? Please ping me. -- Valjean (talk) 14:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can get the stamps from en.stamps.fo. For example for the list of Faroese stamps 2008: FO 639-648. The stamps of Jens Christian Svabo you can find here and here. --Ephraim33 (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I didn't communicate well. We need help with getting them uploaded. I'm not very good at it. We are specifically in need of those with images of people for this list: List of people on the postage stamps of the Faroe Islands. -- Valjean (talk) 15:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Erfurter Dom.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ephraim33

Re: Papyrus Westcar

Re:Image:OCR-A sample.svg and Image:OCR-B sample.svg

TUSC token 1e58d2bc147f3a582fe1c0969c1e0cf3

Tip: Categorizing images

Why are you redirecting pages to categories?

Was soll das?

File tagging File:Doppellipidschicht.jpg

Alan Hodgkin image

File source is not properly indicated: File:Prince-Ghazi-no-2-Shmagh-23-12-03.jpg

Ephraims Blume der Woche

Category:People kissing objects

Cairngaan

cat 19xx Deutsche Bundespost stamps

Tagging empty NoUploads categories

from User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands

Reilly's maps

Notification about possible deletion

Ephraims Blume der Woche

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jerome Karle.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

File:Russian Empire-World War I-Banknote-0.02-Obverse.png and other

fyi

File tagging File:Holevo, Alexander2.jpg

centuries

File:Suttinger, Karl Benedikt (1746-1830).jpg

Stamps of the Faroe Islands

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search