User talk:Efcuse
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
New messages !
[edit]
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:30, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Image:Abbaye du Bec-Hellouin - Monastère Ste Françoise Romaine.jpg
[edit]I checked the categories; to me they seem to be all right (except, perhaps, about "Religious buildings in Eure" as it's not historic; it has been built on 1949).Efcuse (talk) 16:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Catégorisation des images
[edit]Salut Efcuse,
C'est sympa de trouver un francophone avec qui discuter sur Commons. Il y a effectivement énormément d'images mal catégorisées, et pas uniquement les tiennes... Pour ma part, je n'ai jamais réussi à trouver une méthode systématique de catégorisation, ni avec les outils automatiques peu efficaces, ni à partir de l'arborescence des catégories plutôt inextricable ; en général, je m'inspire de la catégorisation d'images correspondant au même sujet ou à un sujet proche, et j'affine en examinant l'arborescence des catégories voisines, et en créant éventuellement des catégories supplémentaires ad hoc ; je me sers aussi de l'onglet "utilisation" de la page image lorsqu'aucune catégorie n'a été définie. En fait, c'est plus l'expérience de l'utilisation des catégories qui me guide qu'une approche bien formalisée. En espérant que mon expérience pourra t'être utile.
Croquant (talk) 12:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Formes d'ondes
[edit]Bonjour,
Je n'ai jamais rencontré ce problème jusqu'à présent. La seule idée qui me vienne, c'est que ta nouvelle image n'est peut-être pas au format PNG comme l'image originale, mais par exemple en JPEG. Croquant (talk) 16:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Acquigny_-_Vitrail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 21:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- L'autre jour j'ai fait une vérification des vitraux photographiés en France, et j'en ai proposé une dizaine à la suppression. C'est un problème auquel les gens ne pensent pas toujours, tant on est habitué à trouver surtout des vitraux anciens dans les églises. Teofilo (talk) 10:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ecran_radar_Xpondeur.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ecran_radar_Xpondeur.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |