User talk:EACC80/Archive 2023
Copyright status: File:Berteroda Bild391 Eiche.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Berteroda Bild391 Eiche.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Berteroda Bild391 Eiche.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mihla Tafel E.C.Homburg.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Mihla Tafel E.C.Homburg.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mihla Tafel E.C.Homburg.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kupfersuhl Bild09.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Kupfersuhl Bild09.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kupfersuhl Bild09.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gumpelstadt Wanderwege Bild17.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Gumpelstadt Wanderwege Bild17.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gumpelstadt Wanderwege Bild17.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gumpelstadt Wanderwege Bild20.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Gumpelstadt Wanderwege Bild20.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gumpelstadt Wanderwege Bild20.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Wanderwege Witzelroda Bild14.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Wanderwege Witzelroda Bild14.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Wanderwege Witzelroda Bild14.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gerstungen23 Bild14.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Gerstungen23 Bild14.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gerstungen23 Bild14.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild13.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild12.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild11.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild10.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild09.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild08.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild07.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild06.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild05.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild04.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild03.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild02.JPG
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild01.JPG
Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 12:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gerstungen23 Bild11.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Gerstungen23 Bild11.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gerstungen23 Bild11.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Didym.
And also:
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild09.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild12.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild02.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild02.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild07.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild03.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild14.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild01.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild10.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild05.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild06.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild08.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
- File:Gerstungen23 Bild11.JPG ( Nominator : Didym | Reason : This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. If you have created this file yourself, or the file is in the public domain, you can edit the file description page to license it under one of the allowed licenses. )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 12:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo, der Versuch meine Dateien mit dem VICUNIA-Upload-Tool hochzuladen ist derzeit nicht möglich. Meine WINDOWS-Schutzmechanismen mögen JAVA basierende Tools nicht !!!
- Momentan kann ich also nur per Hand hochladen. Mein Bildschirm ist recht klein und das Uploadformular träge. Manchmal schaltet es den Lizenzbaustein nicht ein, und schon kommt der Löschprozess ins Rollen.
- Obwohl ich unverzüglich reagiert hatte, wurden auch die ergänzten Dateien schon wieder als Löschkandidaten gelistet. Ihr ÜBERTREIBT das ganze maßlos. Was sind das für Dateien - Kunstwerke? Portraits von bedeutenden Leuten? Es sind Ansichten von Gebäuden, Plätzen, Straßen, Parks, die jeder jeden Tag macht und niemand wird damit einen Euro Geld verdienen. !!!!
- Fazit: Ich habe in einem anderen SOCIA-MEDIA-Projekt mehrere Tausend Fotos und Grafiken hochgeladen, auch mit Namensnennung usw. Und kommerzielle Nutzer sollten sich bei mir melden: In zehn Jahren ganze VIER Rückfragen und das bei Tausenden von Bildern. Man sollte mal drüber nachdenken, was die Zukunft noch bringt. EACC80 (talk) 14:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Creuzburg23 Grundschule Bild3.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Creuzburg23 Grundschule Bild3.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Creuzburg23 Grundschule Bild3.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Hi EACC80. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: omitting transclusion and the subpage. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- I started an immediate deletion request, because:
- wrong spelling for just
LandkreisWartburgkreis, see Category:Objects in Wartburgkreis. - Category:Objects in Landkreis Wartburgkreis is not necessary as redirect.
- empty Cat
- wrong spelling for just
- Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 09:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Eisenach23 streetfuniture 040.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:Eisenach23 streetfuniture 040.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Eisenach23 streetfuniture 040.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC) -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 09:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank - sehr gut ... - das ging aber schnell :-) EACC80 (talk) 09:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove warnings
[edit]
{{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}}
or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}}
at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details).
If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @EACC80: Bitte keine Warnhinweise löschen, wie von User:Jeff G. erwähnt. Jeder kann mal einen Fehler machen. Wichtig ist nur, es nicht wieder zu machen.
- Die gelöschten Diskussionsbeiträge könntest du ja wieder herstellen. Wenn Diskussionsbeiträge aus deiner Sicht erledigt sind, kannst du sie in ein Archiv verschieben. Dann sind sie nicht gelöscht und immer noch auffindbar. Z.B. nach Jahren angelegt, etwa User talk:EACC80/Archive 2023, siehe analog mein Archiv User talk:Triplec85/Archive 2023.
- @EACC80: Falls du dabei Hilfe benötigst (?), könnte ich dir ein Archiv erstellen und die gelöschten Diskussionen dort archivieren. Gruß -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 07:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Triplec85 - Danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte die Hinweise von unserem ukrainischen Kollegen schon befolgt, aber irgendwas ist schief gelaufen, das Archivieren wird mittels Bot bewerkstelligt und das ist folglich ein Hintergrundprozess der meist unbemerkt bleibt. Ich wäre Dir dankbar, wenn Du dieses (mein) Archiv anlegen würdest, die Anleitung in der Wikipedia-Hilfe war konfus beschrieben. Parameter der Archivsuchläufe und Anzahl der präsenten Nachrichten auf der Diskussionsseite bitte zeitlich und umfänglich minimal gestalten. Im Regelfall stehen da nur Hinweise, das ein Bot irgendeinen Fehler festgestellt hat ... . Dann habe ich das zeitnah behoben und kein Hahn kräht mehr danach. Danke. Und nochmals «ganz großen Respekt» vor Deiner Vorarbeit bzgl. der «mustergültigen» Verzeichnisstrukturen. Das ist ein offenes Buch für mich und gestern habe ich auch selbst mal einen Shoptyp dazu erfunden: bei uns gibt es einen Spezialisten für Hörgeräte mit Filialen in jedem größeren Ort - das Thema betrifft halt oft alte Leute. Seltsam, diesen Ladentyp gab es bis dato nicht in Germany. Nochmals Danke - damit will ich mich nun weiter auf die Überarbeitung der zahllosen Rubriken und Lückenfüllung kümmern. - Beste Grüße EACC80 (talk) 08:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G. and EACC80: I have created an archive (user request, see discussion above) and restored the discussions there. See User talk:EACC80/Archive 2023.
- Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 09:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Triplec85: Thank you, Danke. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Triplec85 - Danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte die Hinweise von unserem ukrainischen Kollegen schon befolgt, aber irgendwas ist schief gelaufen, das Archivieren wird mittels Bot bewerkstelligt und das ist folglich ein Hintergrundprozess der meist unbemerkt bleibt. Ich wäre Dir dankbar, wenn Du dieses (mein) Archiv anlegen würdest, die Anleitung in der Wikipedia-Hilfe war konfus beschrieben. Parameter der Archivsuchläufe und Anzahl der präsenten Nachrichten auf der Diskussionsseite bitte zeitlich und umfänglich minimal gestalten. Im Regelfall stehen da nur Hinweise, das ein Bot irgendeinen Fehler festgestellt hat ... . Dann habe ich das zeitnah behoben und kein Hahn kräht mehr danach. Danke. Und nochmals «ganz großen Respekt» vor Deiner Vorarbeit bzgl. der «mustergültigen» Verzeichnisstrukturen. Das ist ein offenes Buch für mich und gestern habe ich auch selbst mal einen Shoptyp dazu erfunden: bei uns gibt es einen Spezialisten für Hörgeräte mit Filialen in jedem größeren Ort - das Thema betrifft halt oft alte Leute. Seltsam, diesen Ladentyp gab es bis dato nicht in Germany. Nochmals Danke - damit will ich mich nun weiter auf die Überarbeitung der zahllosen Rubriken und Lückenfüllung kümmern. - Beste Grüße EACC80 (talk) 08:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
"OSM-Belegmotiv"
[edit]Hallo EACC80, was ist eigentlich mit "OSM-Belegmotiv" in deinen Bildbeschreibungen wie diesem z. B. File:Eisenach23 TEGUT Marienstraße.JPG genau gemeint? gruß, --Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 11:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Die Abkürzung OSM steht für Open Street Map - ich bin dort auch seit Jahren im Dauereinsatz. Dort werden gerne auch Belege in Form von Bildern (Quelle: Wiki Commons) oder zweitbeste Lösung "Verlinkungen auf Webseiten" gewünscht. Ich habe seit Oktober 2023 auf OSM bereits etwa 1000 Motive aus dem Bilderpool zu Heritage ... eingearbeitet, aber überall klaffen gewaltige Lücken, die ich in den nächsten Monaten noch durch gezielte Touren Ort für Ort verringere. Ansonsten wäre es vollkommen sinnfrei bestimmte triviale Objekte wie Bänke, Fahrradständer, Antennenmasten zu knipsen. Alles hat eben einen Hintergrund. EACC80 (talk) 12:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Danke für die Aufklärung. Und vor allem Danke für deine Arbeit hier. --Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 14:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Auch von mir vielen Dank. Ich habe vor drei Wochen begonnen, mal ein bisschen Systematik in die Verzeichnisse einzubauen. Das große Glück ist, das TriplC85 schon vor zwei..drei Jahren die selbe Idee hatte und so habe ich (fast) bei jedem Thema ein erprobtes Beispiel. Und so pflanzt sich das System dann weiter fort, aber die meisten Bundesländer blenden das noch vollkommen aus. Es geht ja auch mit der "hot & dirty" Strategie. Ansonsten ist es eine sinnvolle und erfolgreiche Methode sich die Wartezeit aufs Christkind zu verkürzen ;-) ...
- EACC80 (talk) 15:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Wutha23 Mosbacher Sportverein 1911 eV.JPG
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wutha23 Mosbacher Sportverein 1911 eV.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |