User talk:Dwaipayanc

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Image deletion warning Image:Vidyasagar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.
Image deletion warning Image:Vidyasagar2.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 08:19, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Missing information

[edit]

Hi, please add your sources for the following images: Image:Rammohan.jpg and Image:Mchadblock.jpg. Thuresson 16:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't upload files that don't allow unrestricted modifications. See Commons:Licensing for details. These files will be deleted. --EugeneZelenko 15:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded many images with incorrect license information. Version of Creative Commons licenses on flickr.com is 2.0. You also remove important non-derivatives/non-commercial restrictions (incompatible with Commons:Licensing, so you violates terms of use. You may contact authors of images and ask them to re-license images under CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. --EugeneZelenko 16:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hi

[edit]

Hi! Thanks for notifying me my fault. Basically I often fail to understand the signicance of each licensing, as I am rather infrequent in wikimedia commons. I see that FlickR uses several types of licemsing, version 2.0. make commercial use of the work" are two basic requirements to upload images in commons. Am I right? And that is irrespective of versions. in FlickR, mostly they use version 2.0, however some are licensed under no derivatives or no commercial use or both. Such images cannot be uploaded in commons. Right? I ask you because this clarification would be very helpful, and I shall not upload images that are not acceptable in commons henceforth. Please help.--Dwaipayanc 14:02, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, non commercial/non derivative works are not acceptable on Commons (policy is files could be used by anybody for any purpose). Only files under Creative Commons Atribution (by) and Attribution ShareAlike (by-sa) licenses could be uploaded on Commons.
Of course, you could try to contact authors and ask them to re-license their work under these licenses.
EugeneZelenko 14:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As a matter of fact, right now I am writting letters to the authors! The omages relating to Darjeeling are very important as those have been used in wikipedia in the article Darjeeling. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darjeeling). That article is going some major edits, and have plans to run for FAC. Could the deletion be at least postponed for some days, by the time I am hopeful to fet permission from respective authors. Thanks a lot. Regards.--Dwaipayanc 14:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You could do it yourself. Please write in images descriptions something like Please don't delete this image until XXX. I'm contacting author to re-license image under YYY license. Thank you for understanding. --EugeneZelenko 14:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Again disturbing you! The author of Image:CoffehouseKolkata12.jpg gave me the permission to use the image in Kolkata aticle of Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolkata) - which is a featured article and contains the image. I guess that is not acceptable here in commons, right? In that case, should I upload it in wikipedia and use the email permission? What do you think? I have appealed in the image's talk page also. help, again :( --Dwaipayanc 14:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Same thing applies to Image:Flowermarket.jpg where I have even supplied the link to the email by the author!--Dwaipayanc 14:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think better solution - to upload these images locally on English Wikipedia. English Wikipedia have less restrictive images policies then Commons. May be Creative Commons nc/nd licenses are accepted there too.
E-mail only is not good solution. License change should be visible and accessible for everybody for avoiding legal loopholes: one license in Wikipedia, other - on flickr.com.
EugeneZelenko 14:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Babasteve

[edit]

Unfortunately, I am not the talented photographer Steve Evans, just someone who likes his photos. However, you can contact him through his Flickr homepage -- it seems you'll have to sign up for an account first, though. -- Ranveig 13:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:CoffehouseKolkata12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-Nard 16:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have received an e-mail from the author in which (s)he gives you permission to upload the image under a free license, please forward it to the OTRS. --Boricuæddie 16:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cropped first indian independence day red fort.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 01:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bob biswas cartoon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:31, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kolkatacentral.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kolkatacentral.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Kolkatacentral.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 12:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:All wilds in a slot machine.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:01, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

deletion discussion of files you uploaded

[edit]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peripitus (talk) 00:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cropped first indian independence day red fort.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Harshanh (talk) 01:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:Mosaicpeopleindiafromflickr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Motopark (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radha and Krishna courtship painting photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redtigerxyz (talk) 11:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:PIA01844 modest rotated.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Independence Day India red fort 2008 panorama1.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Independence Day India red fort 2008 panorama1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:07, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tiven2240: File is duplicate, tagged. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 09:41, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]