User talk:Digon3/Archive2

Going on discussions

You might want to participate in the discussions going on here and here - Alvesgaspar 14:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gimp

How do I fix geometric distortion caused by the wide-angle lens in Gimp? --Digon3 15:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I have no idea. My editing application is Corel PhotoPaint. Alvesgaspar 16:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a menu entry under Filters -> Distorts -> Lens Distorts... (I'm using Gimp 2.3). Try the 'main' setting first. It is a bit of trial and error, but once you figure out the settings they should be applicable to all pictures taken with that lens. --Dschwen 16:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vine

The vine on your oak tree is most probably Parthenocissus quinquefolia or Virginia creeper. Lycaon 23:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San Marcos Fort Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape Arch in Arches National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountains in Zion National Park, Utah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image:NYC Public Library Research

I uploaded an edited version of Diliff's picture, trying to suppress the stitching errors.Would you please have a glance? Vassil 25 May 2007

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Cliff in Zion National Park2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ridge View in Arches National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Giraffe Ithala KZN South Africa Luca Galuzzi 2004.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Giraffe Ithala KZN South Africa Luca Galuzzi 2004.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 08:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Digon3, thank you for nominating picture as a FP candidate and for your support. --LucaG 10:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Schloss Cecilienhof Panorama 2.jpg

hello Digon and thank you first of all, I am blown away as usual. I uploaded the missing overlap Image:Schloss Cecilienhof 017a.jpg and re-requested the stitch. I didn't upload the missing one because for some reason the brightness is quite different from one shot to the next, I figured maybe just with four images it would've been enough but obviously that was not good. If the brightness could be consistent to the main part of the building (which came out best I think), that would be great. Question about the Image:Wien Flughafen Schechat outside Panorama.jpg, did the last image Image:Wien Flughafen Schechat May 2007 016.jpg get combined as well? and thank you again for the other panoramas. Gryffindor 05:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You rock. Do you do this professionaly as well, like job-wise? gorgeous. thanks alot. Gryffindor 15:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Colors of Altiplano Boliviano 4340m Bolivia Luca Galuzzi 2006.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Colors of Altiplano Boliviano 4340m Bolivia Luca Galuzzi 2006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 08:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Sossusvlei Dune Namib Desert Namibia Luca Galuzzi 2004.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Sossusvlei Dune Namib Desert Namibia Luca Galuzzi 2004.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 14:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP candidate

New information available on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mamiya 645 Super system.svg Yug (talk) 20:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Green version

I've added a green version of my iris nomination. Let me know what you think. -- Ram-Man 23:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Meet_our_photographers

Hello Digon, sorry for my late answer and thank you to invite me to see MeetOurPhotographers page. Now I understand the recent self-nom boom!
I think it's a good idea to bring pro-photographers to share some of their pictures on Commons.
I'm going to try a self-portrait, sorry for M.o.p. page visitors ;) --LucaG 16:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK Digon, I've just added my profile to M.o.p. If you find something wrong please tell me. Thanx again. --LucaG 21:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Perito Moreno Glacier Patagonia Argentina Luca Galuzzi 2005.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Perito Moreno Glacier Patagonia Argentina Luca Galuzzi 2005.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 12:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Unidentified_Blue_Flower.JPG

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 17:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Digon3 ^talk 20:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wild Petunia Blue Flower 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiderwort Blue Flower 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Discussion

Hi Digon. I have written a few comments about one of your QI candidates here, which you may be interested in. Slaunger 05:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Admin?

Hi Digon3!

I was wondering whether you would accept a nomination for Admin? --ALE! ¿…? 22:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flower 378.jpg

Thank you for identification but I photographed that flower in the Czech Republic, Central Europe. Does it appear also in this area? - Darwinek 09:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiderwort Blue Flower 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pickerelweed Flowers 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wild Petunia Blue Flower 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wild Petunias.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Congrats...

... with your adminship. Lycaon 14:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Digon3, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references....
Cary Bass ^demandez 14:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks deletion

This Image:Barra Ondina Beach of Salvador.jpg is for deletion, realy. (sorry, I don't talk in English). I had made new version, in .png. Thanks. André Koehne^{TALK TO ME} 19:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gordes_2_By_JM_Rosier.JPG

Hi ! I reverted your change because this is clearly a badname case : as original uploader states in the deletion request, he misspelled the extension when he updated (re-uploaded) the image. Compare Gordes_2_By_JM_Rosier.JPG with original version of Gordes 2 By JM Rosier.jpg, not the current version. The deletion request has lasted too long, please speedy delete this image. Thanks. — Xavier, 21:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Robert Campin - L' Annonciation - 1425.jpg

Hi, would you please explain how you came to the conclusion (demonstrated by this edit) that Image:Robert Campin - L' Annonciation - 1425.jpg is not a duplicate of Image:Robert Campin 010.jpg? It is clear to me that they are photos of the same work of art, and that Image:Robert Campin 010.jpg is better because is 1600×812 pixels vs. the 1045×534 pixels of Image:Robert Campin - L' Annonciation - 1425.jpg, although it is not as colorful. Here they are side by side, for comparison:

Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I untagged it as a {{Badname}} because it was not an exact duplicate and uploaded by two different people. I think that for something like this it should be a deletion request as the file is redundant through a better but not identical one. 12:57, 22 July 2007 (UTC) —The preceding incompletely signed comment was added by Digon3 (talk • contribs)[1]

Thank you. I have converted my request to a deletion request. Also, please reply to interactive messages at the location of the original topic to not scatter talk all around, fracturing the discussion. I do have nearly all pages I have posted to recently on my Watchlist. If I missed a comment of yours, please drop me a short reminder with a link. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:La guerre de Trente Ans.svg

Hi,

I don't see what is the point about that change: there are several typography mistakes and presentation issues which are corrected in the new version map, with a more accurate name. So is there any good reason to keep a draft orphan file? Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 21:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for your answer. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 05:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid things ;)

Dear Digon, can you do me another favour? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Syrphus_torvus_on_jeans.jpg is now Eupeodes_lapponicus_on_jeans.jpg

Thank you in advance. Regards, Richard --Makro Freak ^talk 19:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again. Regards --Makro Freak ^talk 10:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dsc05562.jpg

Sorry, but why have you removed the "bad name" template? I want that the image let be renamed: Image:Helium dilution cryostat.jpg. Thanks --Wiso 19:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Wiso 12:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2 questions

Hello, Jon, I'd like to ask you 2 questions please. My first question is how to dispute the image relevance at the page. My second question is, if you as administrator could edit the summary of thatimage.Please respond right here, not on my talk page. I'll check on your respose later. Thank you for your time. --Mbz1 16:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by disputing the image relevance. Also, anyone can edit this image. It is a mirror copy of the commons description page, whatever changes you make to the commons description will also appear on the wikipedia page. --Digon3 ^talk 17:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the response, but I'm still not sure how to edit that image. There's no word "edit" on any of them. I also wonder, if I could somehow protect my talk page from a harassing user. Thanks.--Mbz1 18:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
  - Strange, the edit button should be right next time the file and discussion tabs on the top. I will edit it for you if you want. Also, who is the harassing user? --Digon3 ^talk 18:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - - Yes, if you could please change name "Mila Zinkova" to Mbz1 or better yet to Keta. I do not consider that picture to be mine any more and I do not want to have anything to do with it. About harassment, could you please tell me, if there are any rulls that prevent me from deleting the contest of my talk page. If there are, could you, please point me to where it is written. Thanks again for your time.--Mbz1 19:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Done Changed it to Mbz1. About deleting your talk page, I don't know of any rules, but I think it is alway a good idea to wait a week or so before deleting a discussion. --Digon3 ^talk 21:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even then, you should archive, rather than delete. Please see Template:Dont remove warnings for more info. Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Click on the blue triangle on the right"

Hi, the subject quote appears multiple times on your excellent user page, but I can't find any blue triangles to click on. What do the blue triangles do for you, and how might I get them to show up? Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The blue triangles are suppose to hide the section and when you click on it, it make the section appear. See my wikipedia user page (the show buttons) for what it is suppose to do. However, something about the way the Commons handles Javascript differently than wikipedia does not make it work. I have only seen it work on one user account on my computer, and nowhere else. --Digon3 ^talk 01:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wikimedia-commons/Username

IRC cloak request

I am Digon3 on freenode and I would like the cloak wikimedia-commons/Digon3. Thanks. ----Digon3 ^talk 17:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get a diff. link for this by clicking history after your edit and then '[c]ompare selected versions'. Please do not use any other method to get the diff or this system will probably refuse it.

Vignetting in panoramas

After a panorama stitch one could to a handwaving vignetting correction in drawing some freehand masks. But that is only as good as your mask-drawing capabilities.

The proper way is to correct the original photos. Either do this before you stitch, some general photomanipulation software can do some correction, there are also small specialist programs. The software hugin I use can do it on the go, the most recent betas even determine the correction parameters from the image overlaps themselves. This is what I recommend for panoramas. -- Klaus with K 20:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

Hello,

Would you be so kind to explain why you tagged Image:Bandeira da Bahia.svg as a duplicate of a more recent upload, Image:Flag of Bahia.svg, just to change the name from Portuguese to English, after I had reverted that same tagging some weeks ago?

Commons is a multilingual project; the filenames are in a conventional fashion, being named "flag of xxx" in Portuguese. Changing the names of such flags to another language will affect thousands of pages in dozens of projects, making CommonsDelinker flood RC for days in a row. I know this because it has hapenned already, when user João Felipe CS did the same duplicate tagging.

Please think carefully about such actions before tagging such images. Personally, I am not willing to accept a Portuguese name as a "bad filename" in a multilingual project. Regards, PatríciaR ^msg 23:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for your reply. I am aware that you only did that change and yes I will talk with Alkab in order to clear this up. However, one must use good judgement in doing such tagging. If you would have evaluated the image's history, you would have seen that the image had been tagged before as a duplicate and that tagging had been reverted. This means something strange is going on and in those cases, personally, I prefer to check what's going on before redoing what could have been (and was) a mistake.

I am also a newbie admin in Commons and I am also not comfortable in doing certain actions here yet. But good judgement is not an administrative action. Don't interpret my previous message as a critic, but rather as a call for being observant of the pages histories.

Once again, thanks for the reply, cheers, PatríciaR ^msg 11:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bummer

Hi. I fear you will have a similar problem with this image of a rather rare melanistic Zebra? Lycaon 16:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unknown Quartz crystal 67.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Request for critique

Hi Digon, I admire your panoramics done with an almost similar camera as mine and using Hugin to bring it all together. I have tried making my first panoramic myself, but would like some feedback. If you can spare the time I would be very gratefull if you could have a look at my Upernavik fish-eye panoramic on Photography critiques and give me some hints for improvements. Best wishes, -- Slaunger 04:34, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I had an editing conflict with you because I was in the proces of replying to Klaus. I've uploaded a new ver, but it still has the blurred spots you mention, probably due to not using a tripod. -- Slaunger 16:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania awards

Have you notice this? Extraordinary! - Alvesgaspar 10:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coloso

Hi, I'm not an expert in english language, so forgive my mistakes.

I'm the owner and maker of "Image:Ubicación Coloso.jpg". I have made the map first in autocad for a university project a couple of years ago, and now I have used it to show where the stadium is.

I'm the only and complete owner of the image, and if I have to write something else in the image article fot ir not to be erased, please tell me what to write.

--The Edge 15:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. I have already made the changes. Please check the article and if there's something left to do, please tell me.

I hope this is enough to end the deletion.

--The Edge 03:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amethyst Quartz Macro 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malachite Macro 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silurian Orthoceras Fossil Macro 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Image:Thymelicus_01.JPG

After your and Beyond Silents comments on my picture i added a brighter and noise reduces version. Would you be so kind and take another look on it? --Simonizer 22:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I denoised the original too --Simonizer 07:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture edit

I don't know if this is what you were looking for, but here is an edit: Image:Yellow Lantana Camara 1 Edit.jpg. -- Ram-Man 23:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania Awards

Did you see this? Finally an explanation. --Digon3 ^talk 16:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better than nothing. Still the guy is talking as if he were an outsider with no responsabilities in the process. And no apologies. Alvesgaspar 17:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Unknown Mineral Macro 1.JPG

I'll bet you your mineral is Tourmaline :-) Lycaon 21:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

was Bryce_Canyon_Amphitheater_Hoodoos_Panorama.jpg ever properly QI promoted?

As far as I can see from the archives Image:Bryce_Canyon_Amphitheater_Hoodoos_Panorama.jpg was not promoted (nor was it declined), but I see user:Thermos posted the promoted tag here [[2]]. So although the other versions of this image were properly promoted I don't think this one was. What do you think? (have I asked about this before?) --Tony Wills 09:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that CR was all I could find, do you want to submit it to QI again, and we'll see if we can push it through to tidy things up :-) --Tony Wills 12:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That green tint...

...do you know where it is coming from? I just noticed the (now already promoted) Image:Unknown_Quartz_crystal_67.JPG has it too. Would you still care to reshoot it, or should we try a color correction? I suppose it should not affect the QI status if an image gets further improvements :-) --Dschwen 10:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that ones persons "improvements" are another's "degradations" so a new version really needs to go to QIC, and it may then be judged as to whether the QI tag should be moved to the new version (although it is possible for both to be QI). --Tony Wills 11:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Sossusvlei south view.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Sossusvlei south view.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Rhonegletscher.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rhonegletscher.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Fountains Abbey view crop1 2005-08-27.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Fountains Abbey view crop1 2005-08-27.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 12:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP signature

Hi Jonathan, you forgot to sign here. Lycaon 20:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pyrite Fools Gold Macro 3.JPG

Why don't you shot more closer? Maybe then in full size looks better. --Beyond silence 01:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seahorse Skeleton Macro 8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slate Macro 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow Lantana Camara 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow Lantana Camara 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quartz with Rulite Macro.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rose Quartz Macro 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scoria Macro.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

RE:Meteor picture

Thank you. I do have original image, but why did you ask?--Mbz1 01:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]

- Thank you. It is a great picture. It is hard to capture a meteor. The picture is very noisy. I've used ISO 1600. I would not have problems with capturing Milky Way, but meteor was too delicate and too fast. I captured few of them two nights ago. Have you seen any?--Mbz1 01:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
  - We drove more than 100 miles to get out of fog and out of light pollution and spent all night watching the sky in the company of wild pigs, bats, coyotes and raccoons--Mbz1 01:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural Copper Ore Macro 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aragonite Mineral Macro.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bryce Canyon Amphitheater Hoodoos Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrite Fools Gold Macro 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Coloso

Hi Digon, please give me a hand here Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ubicación Coloso.jpg. I have explained carefully the origin of my image and send it be email to the other user, but he wont believe me!!! How can he?? I have worked 7 months in the map and now he wants it for free!!!

Please help me!

The Edge 14:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fluorite Macro 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grossular Garnet Macro 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unknown white rock Macro 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Sizes

I started to change inches to cm, and realised I did it differently than Vsmith on English Wikipedia. When you wrote about 1 ½ inches, is it so exact that it can be made to 3.8 cm, or is 4 cm better? I will fix them according to your answer. :) Best regards Rhanyeia 14:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the answer on my talk page. Rhanyeia 08:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And for your pictures...

Rhanyeia has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding Smile to their talk page with a friendly message.

Rhanyeia 08:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrolusite Mineral with Dendrite Macro.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Delete Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Serbia1918.png

Because I am new on commons and do not know how things are working can you please explain what is happening with this deletion request. Will this map be deleted, when and if not why not ? Vote has been 17:5 for deleting. Rjecina 02:15, 22 August 2007

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Multi-colored Wild Lantana Camara 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrite Fools Gold Macro 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your Attribution Page

Hi Digon, can I copy your attribution page? Your page seems good for me too and I'm a poor en-2 naive on legal matters. Is it consistent with the crazy debate about "'user-specific templates" ? Thanks --LucaG 17:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Digon, I happy with you using my (now defunct) attribution page, just try to point other askers to it There are some things that I have learned about the license that I want to impart to people before they go using it as a legal release and have their pictures deleted, blah, blah. Oh and I see that Klaus with K told you the problems with fixing the vignetting, anyway, take another look at the FPC, I think the PDX night pano is better then alot of current FPs. Cheers -Fcb981 16:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, if I were you I'd take out the clause about "the only way I can prevent commercial use is with strict attribution requirements", this got me in trouble because I was breaching the "spirit" of the commons. Otherwise looks Ok. I'd also be more specific with the word "near". Example:

The photo credit must be in the immediate vicinity of the picture. (Immediate vicinity can be determined as follows: 1. If in a book or magazine, on the same page as the photograph. 2. Taking the length of the longest side of the picture and halving it ((ie. 6mm/2=3mm)) gives the maximum distance the credit can lye from the edge of the picture. 3. the photo credit must fit both criterion 1 and 2.)

Hope this helps, Later --Fcb981 17:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gulf Fritillary Butterfly on a Lantana 18 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Vignetting in panoramas

On my talk page user Fcb981 asked me for help in tackling vignetting in his panorama. Unfortunately he has the ingredients stored elsewhere, I would be happy to help him with a restitch, but do not see much of a point of me trying to correct vignetting in the stitched image. Of course one might juggle around with gradient masks. -- Klaus with K 14:18, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Commons FP

Thank you, Jon.--Mbz1 16:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]

unknown rock

Hi, Jon, I believe your unknown rock File:Unknown rock 80.jpg is so called Gypsum Rose.--Mbz1 17:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Large Glass Fishing Float with Net 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

How to ask deletion

Hi Digon, I would like to ask the deletion for this terrible edit: Image:Piles of Salt Salar de Uyuni Bolivia Luca Galuzzi 2006 a bloom.jpg but I find Deletion_guidelines too much complicate for me. Can you help me? --LucaG 23:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done via the following. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 15:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Piles of Salt Salar de Uyuni Bolivia Luca Galuzzi 2006 a bloom.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Piles of Salt Salar de Uyuni Bolivia Luca Galuzzi 2006 a bloom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 15:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delistings

Thank you Jon. I posted a comment on the delisting page and I voted on the absurd delisting request of Daniel's cow image.
I joined the project 9 months ago with enthusiasm because I found here a lot of very good contributors but now I'm a little less enthusiast finding people who like to wreck others' work like almost happened against Fir0002. --LucaG 08:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I've noticed images deletion stay open for a while can you please close this? I replaced the licenses with valid ones thank you, [3]. Also close this? [4] the image was found in US archives before 1923 published cited in a site also the license is fixed there thank you. --ArmeniGen 00:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed your vote on the page accidentally you said delete, [5] --ArmeniGen 17:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-stating license requirements

If someone isn't going to read the CC-By-SA licensing requirements, then they're not going to read your simplification. What's more, you're adding new language, which is almost certain to do one of two things: restrict the usage of the images more than you'd intended or give the licensee and unintended loophole to avoid one or more restrictions in the license. It's usually best to let lawyers worry about licensing terms. If you want to stress it, I'd just make your disclaimer: Attribution is required with this image. Please see the Creative Commons CC-By-SA-2.5 license for details on attribution requirements. -Harmil 03:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Digon3/Archive2

Going on discussions

Gimp

Vine

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Image:NYC Public Library Research

Quality Image Promotion

FP promotion

FP Promotion

FP Promotion

FP candidate

Green version

Commons:Meet_our_photographers

FP Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Discussion

Admin?

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Congrats...

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

Thanks deletion

Stupid things ;)

2 questions

"Click on the blue triangle on the right"

IRC cloak request

Vignetting in panoramas

Flags

Bummer

Quality Image Promotion

Request for critique

Wikimania awards

Coloso

Quality Image Promotion

Picture edit

Wikimania Awards

was Bryce_Canyon_Amphitheater_Hoodoos_Panorama.jpg ever properly QI promoted?

That green tint...

FP Promotion

FP signature

Image:Pyrite Fools Gold Macro 3.JPG

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

RE:Meteor picture

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Coloso

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Sizes

Quality Image Promotion

Delete Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Serbia1918.png

Quality Image Promotion

Your Attribution Page

Quality Image Promotion

Vignetting in panoramas

Re:Commons FP

unknown rock

Quality Image Promotion

How to ask deletion

Delistings

Hi

Re-stating license requirements

Navigation menu

Search